All Activity

Well, aside from AGE being a factor.....because you do have elderly people in prison who aren't strong enough to fight off some of these young bucks..... The fact is, some men....straight men....for whatever reason....ALLOW themselves to get poked.

Unless a straight dude is over-powered by several people or drugged, he should be able *fight* well enough to maintain his manhood. If a man cannot defend himself against being taken advantage of by another man...he's already compromised.

ProfD We already are! Lol...when was the last time you watched ESPN? You can't turn on your television without seeing rich Black men in loud pin-stripped suits grinning and running their mouths. Sitting at desks. Giving the news. On stage telling jokes and running their mouths. Rich niggaz on national television wearing suits and SLAPPING the shit out of eachother..... And more rich niggaz in the audience watching it and grinning.... WE GOT MONEY! Look at Congress and all the Black folks you see in red dresses and bald heads, pointing fingers and walking fast with stacks of papers in their hands. I was at Starbucks today and saw so many niggaz in Audis and Benzes roll up and hop out their rides... it made me proud, lol. This wasn't Chicago or Atlanta either....this is in a relatively small town in western Michigan, but plenty of Black folks obviously doing VERY well. The struggle comes when we try to rise COLLECTIVELY. So many of us think at an individual level and can't get along with other Black folks.

Yep. They have divided themselves into the Progressive Far Left and Moderate/Centrist. Neither has much power over real Republicans.

Yep. They piggybacked on Civil Rights Movement. White men got tired of them complaining and lumped that sh8t together. Gotcha. Understand your perspective. Hopefully, I'll still be around whenever Black men use their power to redistribute wealth.

It appears that Democrats are nothing more than Republican lite. What I've been noticing for years....decades now...is how they play the game. Republicans will come along and introduce some right-wing policy. Usually it doesn't get passed and the Democrats will PRETEND to fight against it. They'll wait a few years or wait until we change Presidents a couple times and then the Republicans will introduce an EVEN MORE extreme and asinine right-wing policy 10 times worse than the one they originally pushed for. The Democrats will them come through with THAT same policy that was originally pushed by Republicans but offer it as a milder and tamer alternative that the public will find more palatable. They did this with Health Care. They did this with Welfare Reform. They did this with Affirmative Action. The Democrats pushed more Republican policies through than Republicans themselves.

Right. Those same Democrats could have codified Roe v Wade. Nope. Two sides of the same coin or two wings on the same bird.

ProdD I still believe it is a cultural thing with those dudes treating their women like 2nd class citizens. Absolutely. It's part of their cultures and religions itself! Their very religions regulate women to 2nd class status and that below man so they don't even see it as wrong. They see it as being "right" and the moral thing to do. Just like many of them see STONING women to death for being disrespectful the right and moral thing to do. The main reason those same dudes treat their women *better* here in the US is because of the laws. They don't wanna end up in the penalty box. Well that's obvious. However the change in the laws and policies to protect women were HEAVILY influenced by Black men. Remember the Women's Movement didn't really pick up steam and get anywhere until the CIVIL RIGHTS Movement took off in the 50s. White women had been complaining about mistreatment, wanting to vote, and suffrage decades, starting way back in the 1800s. Susan B. Anthony and 'em. But it didn't get anywhere UNTIL the 60s when Black men ran up to the door and kept White men so busy fighting and trying to keep US out that White women were able to squeeze past and get in. I don't believe the number of FBA men in those other countries is significant enough to make a difference to the white men there. The difference is made PSYCHOLOGICALLY. If push really came to shove....places like Australia and France don't have enough FBA to really turn up. England does. Canada...probably...probably not...lol. ....but those nations are so heavily INFLUENCED by FBA sub-culture that they have enough PSEUDO-NIGGAZ to influence the culture and norms of society. Hiphop other aspects of Black American sub-culture...both positive and negative.....is so embraced by Africans, West Indians, and even Arabs and Asians in those nations, they pretty much ALL act like niggaz when ain't no REAL niggaz around, lol. Go to some parts of France or Australia and you'll see a Chinese girl bouncing down the street Crip Walking better than you ever saw Snoop doing it....lol. White countries seem to be less restrictive than other countries where they keep women covered up and won't let them learn or drive Well like I said, that's ONLY because of the presence of men of color. Where do you think the oppressive anti-female culture that you find in places like Arabia and Pakistan COME from? It originally came from the Caucasians who invaded and imposed it on these regions. Arabs are pretty much the descendants of Caucasian men who stole the region and forced themselves on women of color killing off and enslaving the rest of the population. Same with much of India. Ofcourse THEY are mixed race and many of them are Black, but the racist and sexist mentality REMAINS through out the region. It was passed down from father to child.

I've said it before and I'll continue to say it, if a man can get an erection for another man...especially one strong enough to penetrate his anus....his ass is ALREADY gay/bisexual. He didn't "turn" that way in prison....lol. Now if he's RECEIVING...that's a different story. You don't need to be "stimulated" or "turned on" to receive....all you need is a hole. A straight dude can "get it" either voluntarily or by force. But an erection means you were stimulated and turned on.....and turned up....to turn somebody out! The Romans and Greeks didn't stop at homosexuality and p----ilia, they also engaged in sex with animals too. As the late great Neely Fuller Jr. reminded us from time to time, when you see statues like this around Europe: Half man....half horse. That MEANS something. They didn't just dream that up to be "artistic". That means they actually tried to PRODUCE creatures like that....by fucking horses. ...and goats, and sheep, and chickens, and camels, etc.

They should have been fighting for Universal Healthcare instead of some disastrous and confusing Obama Care that makes the insurance companies richer than they already are. At one point during Obama's Presidency....both the House of Representatives AND the Senate was majority Democrat and I think the S-Court more Left leaning than they are today. They not only could have passed Universal Healthcare but they probably could have CONSTITUTIONALIZED it and made it a Constitutional Right of every citizen.

If you look at it in isolation, it's not so obvious. But when you look at that location AND the number of long walls and fortresses that have been built AROUND that location that encircles it. Great Wall of China Wall of Gorgan Wall of Bukhara ....walls and fortresses that have been built at different periods of history, all support some sort of effort to CONTAIN people and PROTECT one's territory from being overran by outsiders. Infact, much of the history of Caucasians being "contained" in this region is actually buried in mythology. The "Watchers" you read about in non-canon Christian and Jewish literature like the Book of Enoch actually is based on these Black guards who were sent to that central Asia region to "watch" over the White people who were driven up there.

Democratic House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries is still selling tickets to a fight against Republicans that doesn't exist. Rep. Jeffries is vowing that Democrats will continue fighting for Affordable Care Act (ACA) tax credits. There's no path to Democrats winning a fight when Republicans are majority in House and Senate. Rep . Jeffries House seat may be safe for now. However, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer's political future is in jeopardy as Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez may primary him. Regardless, the Democrats are as stable as a 3 leg chair in Congress. They are powerless. Somebody needs to tell Rep. Jeffries to sat down somewhere...else.

the continued adventure from 'To Love and To Hold' by Richard Murray Love is a beautiful thing, seen everywhere plus everywhere not seen. Sometimes, it has challenges. The biggest being the lies we tell ourselves or the truths that can't be changed. Eme and Henshaw dealt with this before, when Henshaw was nearly denied to marry because of a possibility in his past, and when Eme was nearly denied because of a possbility Henshaw didn't want to see. What if, two others, not so large of body, and far older in time, have a similar problem. "To Love and to Hold" was directed by Ndubuisi Okoh. It starred Kate Henshaw-Nuttal, Michael Okon, Fred Essien, Joke Silva, Mariatherese Rogers, Karian Abasimfon URL https://www.kobo.com/ebook/the-janidogo Join the calendar for more news The calendar entry https://aalbc.com/tc/events/event/293-the-janidogo-11112013/

It has never been normal. IMO, just because people have been engaging in abnormal activities for a long time doesn't normalize it.

Was it normal ? Is it normal ?

@ProfD yeah The senate have confirmed so it is up to the house and the republican was made in the house so case closed. I do think the focus should be schumer's leadership. Regardless of what one thinks of the donkey's or elephants, schumer is supposed to be the leader of the donkeys in the senate and some broke ranks, technically only seven broke ranks. Angus King is an independent from maine, not a donkey. but Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., and Maggie Hassan, D-N.H. ,Dick Durbin of Illinois; John Fetterman of Pennsylvania are all northeasters while Catherine Cortez Masto and Jacky Rosen of Nevada are not. https://aalbc.com/tc/events/event/584-the-shutdown-ends-potentially/

I still believe it is a cultural thing with those dudes treating their women like 2nd class citizens. The main reason those same dudes treat their women *better* here in the US is because of the laws. They don't wanna end up in the penalty box. I don't believe the number of FBA men in those other countries is significant enough to make a difference to the white men there. White countries seem to be less restrictive than other countries where they keep women covered up and won't let them learn or drive. White men are willing to sacrifice women especially if 1) they don't really want for themselves and 2) use them to weaken Black men. Surely, white men don't care about giving up those less than attractive white women Black men seem to bun up.

When the dust settles, these politicians will have accomplished nothing. D8mn shame that they get paid while not doing their jobs. Nevermind that most of them are already rich. Ridiculous.

They were homosexuals. Same goes for Romans most notably Caligula. They are either homosexual or bisexual. The United States has become extremely tolerant of s8xual orientation and s8xual behavior. Thankfully, children and animals are still off limits. Filthy rich perverts have been able to cross that line too. Again, that's why so many folks want to live in the land of the *free*.

Nero Prince was born America. He worked for Czar Alexander I. Not a noteworthy historical figure. Jean Sagbo was an African who studied in Russia. He became an unpaid councilman in the town he lived. They called him the Russian Obama merely because he was Black. He wasn't a historical figure either. There are no Black Russians of historical significance similar to AfroAmericans.

Hard to say.....I would say Nero Prince or Jean Sagbo As far as my research tells me is that the Africans who became white european where called Grimaldi. It most cases people are usually named after the land....not the land after the people - now true this is not always the case. True Yes some of this is true to historical texts.....the idea of containment not so sure

Replace that word "faggot" with "sissy" and that saying would make more sense.

Were you having homosexual urges when you were wrestling. So were Ancient Greek men and boys normal? Make homosexuality is not culturally acceptable, in the US and Africa. Yet there is a population of men that are publicly are with women and privately with men. I tend to look beyond the surface. Or tve generality accepted narrative. Normal is what 68% of the population does. What is normal us dependent on mores. Groups and subgroups have different norms. Are men in prison that have sex with other men normal? i read the following quote from a Black man, "You can be gay in the ghetto, but you can't be a faggot.

S8xual preference and s8xual behavior goes back hundreds of years. That doesn't make it normal. The issue here is normaliizing and accepting the effeminization of men and/or effeminate behavior. Throughout most of the planet, alternative s8xual orientation, practices and effeminate behavior are frowned upon and will get a man unalived in many cases. S8xual persecution and freedom is one reason people flee those countries that do not tolerate it. Go over there talking about s8xual fluidity and behavioral dynamism and be prepared to get that head busted wide open and leaking red kool-aid.

richardmurray Pioneer, where are you from? You do realize that supermarket chain owners sign contracts with stipulations? Legal agreements are sometimes signed for certain food items with stipulations on how to care. Let alone that city/state/federal laws may state what can or can not happen? The FDA doesn't allow the interstate sale of butter so... what other laws are there. Where are you from? Do you own a business? Man, what's wrong with you....I just TOLD you to pardon me for not knowing the laws of New York and quite frankly the laws and policies governing grocery stores and food in general. I'm not a restaurant or supermarket owner, so how am I supposed to just "know" what the rules and regulations are???? I know there are laws that regulate how food is HANDLED and STORED but not necessarily how it's PORTIONED for sales. You're acting like this shit is common sense or something you learn in elementary school...lol They sell APPLES in bags or individually, don't they? They sell YOUGURT in packs or individually, don't they? They sell POP, POTATO CHIPS, CANDY, FRUIT, VEGETABLES, PORTIONS OF MEAT...already packaged or in individual portions in most grocery stores and supermarkets I've been in around the country. So how am I supposed to know there's a law PROHIBITING them from doing so with a gotdamn stick of butter? BTW, Wal-Mart sends semi-trucks FULL of butter, cheese, milk, meat, and other foods constantly cross state lines and across the nation so I'm not sure what you're talking about. so that is why you ask questions answered in the post, well thank you, i now fully comprehend the quality of your statements in the forum. Ofcourse. People have other things to do, besides come on here and read a whole 6 page THESIS on something that can be summed up in 3 paragraphs. I don't want to read Mamdani's entire Manifesto for the City of New York from A-Z just to answer a couple questions -that I really ALREADY know the answers to. I don't have time for it, nor do I have a desire to do so if I did. Mamdani hasn't even got his plan accepted. and like before all you offer is judgement, no ideas, no positive quality. You are like one of those rush limbaugh style podcasters just through text. Man, are you serious? Offer ideas???? He ain't running no damn high school talent show! People aren't sitting around in circles offering "positive ideas"! These folks have an AGENDA. They DON'T WANT your "positive ideas" because Mamdani and the people who PUT him in office already have THEIR IDEAS to push THEIR AGENDA! But Mamdani needs results so he is being more forceful than obama or fellow obamite elected officials in trying to get something done. It doesn't matter how many starry eyed niggas voted for him thinking they'll really get some sort of change We pretty much KNOW his Administration is going to follow the same path the others before him have followed, which means catering to the billionaires and elite of New York and the further marginalization of the AfroAmerican populace. If you disagree, let me ask you...do you have some sort of magic mirror or crystal ball where you can see into the future and see something DIFFERENT? If not, what's with all the head scratching and confusion about what the hell that man is going to do or who he's going to help? "Laaaawd ham'mercy we just elected a new Mayor! Hush up now and be positive! Let's see what he gonna do!" You KNOW the man is not Jesus! You KNOW he's not a miracle worker. So besides having a funny-ass name, what makes HIM any different than the other characters who occupied that seat?