BEGIN:VCALENDAR VERSION:2.0 PRODID:-//InvisionCommunity Events 5.0.18//EN METHOD:PUBLISH CALSCALE:GREGORIAN REFRESH-INTERVAL:PT15M X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT15M X-WR-CALNAME:RMCommunityCalendar NAME:RMCommunityCalendar BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:Europe/London TZURL:https://tzurl.org/zoneinfo/Europe/London X-LIC-LOCATION:Europe/London BEGIN:DAYLIGHT TZOFFSETFROM:+0000 TZOFFSETTO:+0100 TZNAME:BST DTSTART:20250330T020000Z RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=-1SU END:DAYLIGHT BEGIN:STANDARD TZOFFSETFROM:+0100 TZOFFSETTO:+0000 TZNAME:GMT DTSTART:20251026T020000Z RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=10;BYDAY=-1SU END:STANDARD END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT SUMMARY:Estimations of Change  02/15/2025 DTSTAMP:20250215T214453Z SEQUENCE:0 UID:196-7-c3fe8195a3dde498d013e477e2142422@aalbc.com ORGANIZER;CN="richardmurray":noreply@aalbc.com DESCRIPTION:\n Estimations of Change  02/15/2025\n\n How some wait to g et a change back.\n\n https://aalbc.com/tc/profile/6477-richardmurray/?sta tus=2843&\;type=status\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n Estimations\n The Pr iest of Kemet after Akhenaten died\n Some people in Scotland including Rob ert Burns after he wrote \"Such a Parcel of Rogues in a Nation\"\n The Dau ghters of the American Revolution raised on the tales of the glory in the former confederate states \n The Isolationist who opposed Woodrow Wilson\ n The non black business and communities at the advent of the civil rights act of 1963\n *\n All have one thing in common\, they disliked a change a nd worked all their lives to undo the change. \n One of the problems in h umanity in the Statian imperial phase of the white European global imperia l era is the  idea of change being holistically beneficial. No change is ever beneficial to all\, no change. In the same way no permanence is ever beneficial to all. \n *\n The Tariffs are coming from decades of complain ts by a group\, mostly non black while not exclusively non black\, made up of a collection of groups in the usa: pro deletion of any legal statement to black rights /pro isolation/ pro intracommunal finance between states. The Tariffs from the usa to others + the Diversity Equity Inclusivity D.E .I. deletion or reductions show this clearly. \n Ever since the end of th e war between the states\,a group of non blacks in the united states of Am erica have worked to delete the presence/notion/idea of black empowerment/ rights/equality to non blacks.\n Ever since Woodrow Wilson\, a group of hy per allegiants in the usa have worked to disconnect the U.S.A. from allian ces to any other country. They have opposed the United Nations\, the World Bank\, North Atlantic Treaty Organization\, North American Free Trade All iance and all other alliances that force the usa to act in tandem to anoth er government. \n *\n Most humans at some point in their life go through a change they don't want in their community or the larger environment wher e they live. It isn't right to live with the change or wrong to fight agai nst the change\, or vice versa. Humans are free to choose\, but when a cha nge occurs that surprises you\, it can be a train derailment unlike any ot her\, buckle up.\n *\n IN AMENDMENT\n some people in the usa waited decade s for this day to happen or are witnessing their parents or grandparents d ream come true in the current presidency\, Isolation has not been supporte d as strongly in the usa since before woodrow wilson\, that is over one hu ndred years ago... the daughters of the american revolution are cheering i n their graves that the community of those willing to oppose betterment fo r blacks is still going strong. ... The second term of shaking is upon us all\, I ponder the future\n ...\n well underestimation of others is balanc ed by overestimation of oneself. It is unwise to do either. I think many\, in the democratic party at the least\, didn't or don't realize how many i n the usa \, for various reasons\, don't like the global system the usa ce nters or the racial changes the democratic party has championed. I remembe r the election\, the current president's supporters cheered loudest when h e talked of the things he is doing now. They didn't just cheer they voted. \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n 02162026 \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n Citation\n\n\n\n https:/ /aalbc.com/tc/topic/12472-estimations-of-change /#findComment-80140\n\n\n \n osted just now\n\n\n\n @ProfD \n\n\n\n   12 hours ago\, ProfD sai d:\n\n\n\n Change is inevitable over the course of a lifetime. Humans adap t to changes accordingly.\n\n\n\n yes\, change is possible from day to day let alone the course of a lifetime. And human beings do react/act in resp onse to changes. But said reactions are not always accordingly while said reactions are never right or wrong. Negative or positive? yes\, but not ri ght or wrong and in the context of the usa\, this is a huge topic. the usa has the most internally multiracial gathering of humans beings under any government in humanity. Which means by default changes in the usa\, as whi tes in the usa have been learning [ slower than all others but more and mo re ]since 1492 \, tend to be against all groups/communities/gatherings ben efit. The examples are plenty in the usa. White individuals who are less a ligned to the white populace while more aligned to their individual desire s have less problems with the largess of mexicans/chinese/indians in the u sa. White individuals who are more aligned to white communal life by defau lt have more problems with the largess of the non white europeans whose li ves by default weaken the positive potential of the white community to do for its own. Modern day Harlem is majority non black\, black individuals i n harlem whose personal life could handle the changes brought on by the no n black in harlem have survived or thrived. Black individuals in harlem wh ose personal life was attached and needed the environment when harlem was majority black have been pushed out or have succumbed to a misery in harle m. Immigrant individuals  post immigration act of 1965 who can survive be ing the only person like them in some place within the usa have done bette r. Immigrant individuals post immigration act of 1965 who needed a simulat ion of their monoracial environment from whence they came are going throug h ever increasing problems \, culminating in immigration and customs enfor cement parking themselves in immigrant communities in cities knowing most in the community are adherents to some illegality. NAtive American individ uals from the european colonial age have always done better when able to l ive alone or as a small group among the hordes of second peoples. Native A merican individuals tied to the first peoples way of life  \, as one of m y heroes Tecumseh\, have lived a life of terror from 1492 to 2026 and coun ting. \n\n\n\n But no matter how any of the peoples mentioned react to ch ange\, no reaction is right or wrong\, nor according. By default\, change is the most unaccording thing. IT is interesting\, you chose the incomplet e phrase\, humans adapt to changes accordingly. Adapt means to fit. Accord means to be in line. Thus whenever I have heard that phrase \" humans ada pt to changes accordingly\" or read it most recently\, it is interesting\, philosophically\, how incomplete the phrase is. Human reaction to change includes adaptation + lack of adaption. to speak only of human adaptation is to partially ignore the fact that a human does not have to adapt /fit t he changes. and changes being according/liking or even or harmonius is onl y for those that choose to fit/adapt. The heritage of Black descended of e nslaved speaking as such comes from black enslaved parents from 1492 who l ike 99% of thier descendents in the european colonial phase of the usa or the usa itself till 1980\, had nothing to give black children\, sometimes not even time\, so provided lessons\, sharp\, inflexible\, which served su rvival functions for the black child as an individual. ala to a black chil d\, \"you must adapt to changes accordingly\" That language is a very old Black DOS heritage\, brewed through centuries of being terrorized by white s\, unable to collectively do anything\, forced to survive as individuals with constant negative changes imposed by others\, beyond any black indivi dual to control or deter\, no matter said black individuals happiness.\n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n 02162026\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n Citation\n\n\n\n https://aalbc .com/tc/topic/12472-estimations-of-change /#findComment-80149\n\n\n\n  \ n\n\n\n osted just now\n\n\n\n @ProfD \n\n\n\n   3 hours ago\, ProfD  said:\n\n\n\n Despite the multiracial make-up of the USA...white folks s till run it.\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n For the record I never said white people d idn't control the usa. It makes perfect sense that white people control th e usa since they started it. again\, most native americans or black descen ded of enslaved people at the time of the creation of the usa were fightin g to stop it from being created and even in the war of 1812\, decades afte r the usa was founded\,  most native americans or black descended of ensl aved were opposed to the usa and fought for it to be deleted and made part of the english empire again. so... it makes perfect sense today that whit e people run a government they wanted. \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n   3 hours a go\, ProfD said:\n\n\n\n The poorest white folks still have more privile ge &\; access to safety nets than non-whites. \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n Whit es who have a problem with immigrants really need to take their issues up with the white folks who use them for cheap labor &\; maximized profits . Rich getting richer. \n\n\n\n white priviledge makes perfect sense. The greater question is what black fool thinks it shouldn't be that way in th e usa today? I can't think of any reason why whites in the usa shouldn't h ave more power/advantage/positivity in the usa than the non white\, regard less of its makeup.\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n the heritage of fiscally poor white s in the usa of attacking the nonwhite to gain is very strong. the fiscall y poor whites don't want to risk breaking white unityby attacking the fisc ally wealthy whites\, though they don't comprehend the white unity of the past has already been broken\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n   3 hours ago\, ProfD  said:\n\n\n\n Humans have been adapting to changes accordingly throughout their existence on the planet.\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n Whether it is relocation \, climate\, environment\, natural disasters\, etc.\, humans have to adapt in order to survive. \n\n\n\n my point is that is a half truth\, history proves humans can block changes \, or delete changes\, it is a lie to onl y look at those who adapted\, those who didn't adapt but stopped change al so occurred as equally. That is my point to the Black DOS heritage. Black DOSers in the USA were and are forced to adapt to what changes the non bla ck want\, historically\, but that is not de facto for all peoples\, includ ing black peoples in human history. \n\n\n\n I think it is false to glori fy adaption to change. Adapting to change is not evil\, but nor is it a go od. IT is an option humans have. \n\n\n\n  \n\n DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20250215 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1 END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR