BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//InvisionCommunity Events 4.7.23//EN
METHOD:PUBLISH
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
REFRESH-INTERVAL:PT15M
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT15M
X-WR-CALNAME:RMCommunityCalendar
NAME:RMCommunityCalendar
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/London
TZURL:http://tzurl.org/zoneinfo/Europe/London
X-LIC-LOCATION:Europe/London
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20250330T020000Z
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=-1SU
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20251026T020000Z
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=10;BYDAY=-1SU
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
SUMMARY:Viking Archery Truth Shadversity + Larsanderson23
DTSTAMP:20250920T202859Z
SEQUENCE:0
UID:514-7-c3fe8195a3dde498d013e477e2142422@aalbc.com
ORGANIZER;CN="richardmurray":troy@aalbc.com
DESCRIPTION:\n	viking aiming early attempts  Shadversity\n\n	https://ww
	w.youtube.com/watch?v=wmGORk9z5zQ\n\n\n\n	\n\n\n\n	 \n\n\n\n	Lars Anderso
	n Viking Archery video\n\n	short\n\n	https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rii-o
	WSsU4s\n\n\n\n	\n\n\n\n	long\n\n	https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g_UOfqXL3
	SM\n\n\n\n	\n\n\n\n	 \n\n\n\n	my comment shadversity\n\n\n\n	I think you 
	two had good fun with this one. I did learn something. What is clear is\, 
	as the common technique changed over time\, the media interpretation of th
	e past simply ignored the common technique used in the past. I think that 
	is very interesting. I wonder how many techniques were done differently in
	 various martial arts in the past\, that most people today don't recognize
	. I do think the run test is the one that really makes the case for this s
	tyle. You can't run with your arms level to your shoulders faster than you
	 can with your arms parallel to the side of the torso. \nI argue\, Viking
	 archery wasn't weird. It was styled for people who shot while running and
	 close chaotic combat\, which you guys didn't test. \nThe standing style 
	is best for the large armies\, the lines of archers in the roman empire/Ke
	met empire/Chinese empire. But\, the Rus/Varangians/Vikings/northmen were 
	raiding peoples. The Varangians and Rus and Danes and Normands eventually 
	became kingdoms or empires\, but the raiding by Northmen occurred from tes
	tament to the muslim governments before during and after the formation of 
	kingdoms by Northmen. My point being\, the Northmen liked to raid\, more t
	han have a huge standing army and I think it reflects how the structure of
	 organizations like the holy roman empire born from a hybrid roman/northma
	n culture was a set of principalities fighting themselves raiding\, and th
	e dissolution of the Carolingian empire after Charlemagne died between his
	 sons who raided each other. Raiding culture allows for an army to be the 
	raiding force but I bet alot of raids not all from northmen were far fewer
	 people\, and not as absolutely devastating to the raided. So that an army
	 was usually more an alliance of raiders/Vikings/pirates than a regimented
	 army under one crown. \nAnyway\, I wish you guys would had made the foll
	owing test\, on your first attempts with the Viking style. \n Take a thi
	rty pound bow on the run and try to hit a target middle of the run while r
	unning\, perpendicular to the path of the run\, and after release keep run
	ning.\nAnd take a hundred pound bow on the run and try to hit a target mid
	dle of the run while running\, perpendicular to the path of the run\, and 
	after release keep running. \nThen try the same two run's above but have 
	an option of three targets and randomly select one. I bet the advantage of
	 the lower pound bow or the Viking style will occur. \nWhat I think it wi
	ll prove is\, while the standing arms up style is better for more poundage
	 standing still in a line of bowfolk or aiming from safe distances to targ
	ets\, the running style is better suited for a mobility demanded random ob
	stacle environment where one may be alone at times or using a random arrow
	 and unable to stand and shoot.\nRaiding is war\, but it is another form o
	f war. Raiding isn't campaigns of one big army against another big army\, 
	raiding can be a group\, attacking a town in another country. In that envi
	ronment mobility is key. you can't stay and set up camp cause the town wil
	l get reinforcements that the group can't handle. \n\n\n\n\n	\n\n	comment
	 url\n\n	https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wmGORk9z5zQ&amp\;lc=Ugz1DcSkrkdKL
	ciwUdl4AaABAg\n\n\n\n	my comment lars Anderson long version\n\n	very infor
	mative thank you. The question I have is about European media. The paintin
	gs show the truth\, but later on the styles changed. Were people in europe
	 ashamed cause when  I think on the northman method\, I realize \, anyone
	 can see it suits a raiding culture. not really large lines of bowfolk. Ma
	ybe people in europe descended from vikings were ashamed of the raiding cu
	lture of the vikings? any thoughts. I can make a modern example. In the US
	A many white people speak of the earliest and early white european settler
	s as farmers who just happened to have muskets. Colonial Williamsburg eras
	es all violent actions to indigenous people of the americas from european 
	settlers and their descendents. It is shame. \n\n	https://www.youtube.com
	/watch?v=g_UOfqXL3SM&amp\;lc=UgyFbqqi8q-Vw3Cy3sV4AaABAg&amp\;pp=0gcJCSMANp
	G00pGi\n\n\n\n	good one\, but also add\, the people telling them they were
	 wrong\, never tried to bow while running their fastest in a gauntlet with
	 random targets. \n\n	https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g_UOfqXL3SM&amp\;lc
	=UgxIPp_NaiJSfa0eO294AaABAg.AMiV_GmzeTwAN7li5gdfT-&amp\;pp=0gcJCSMANpG00pG
	i\n\n
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20250920
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
