BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//InvisionCommunity Events 4.7.23//EN
METHOD:PUBLISH
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
REFRESH-INTERVAL:PT15M
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT15M
X-WR-CALNAME:RMCommunityCalendar
NAME:RMCommunityCalendar
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/London
TZURL:http://tzurl.org/zoneinfo/Europe/London
X-LIC-LOCATION:Europe/London
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20250330T020000Z
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=-1SU
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20251026T020000Z
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=10;BYDAY=-1SU
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
SUMMARY:the black superhero paradox
DTSTAMP:20251023T213855Z
SEQUENCE:0
UID:558-7-c3fe8195a3dde498d013e477e2142422@aalbc.com
ORGANIZER;CN="richardmurray":troy@aalbc.com
DESCRIPTION:\n	\n\n	the black superhero paradox\n\n	https://www.youtube.
	com/watch?v=kYzQdGuirRY\n\n\n\n	 \n\n\n\n	\n\n\n\n	 \n\n\n\n	MY COMMENT\
	n\n	nice video:) One thing is that the black populace in the usa has survi
	ved mostly nonviolently/law abidingly/self incriminatingly through a lot o
	f white violence/oppresion/terrorism to be more financially profitable tod
	ay and that helps black creators. At the end of the day\, the artist of an
	y populace are mostly funded by the populace themselves.\n\n	IN AMENDMENT\
	n\n	Well\, here is my problem with your argument. Did black people start w
	ith eisner's interpretation and other white artist interpretation? For me\
	, the black superhero is only defined by black creators and I have a probl
	em with black people who seem very willing to treat white interpretations 
	of black people as valid. I don't care that white people viewing depiction
	s of black people by white artist see a negative interpretation of black p
	eople. The question in my mind is\, why do black people care when white pe
	ople see negative depictions of black people by white artist? \n\n	...\n\
	n	you talk about not isolating other communities while focusing on uplifti
	ng the black community but what you really mean is not isolating white rea
	ders. And I argue\, if a white writer is making a black character\, that b
	lack character isn't designed for black readers and if a black writer is m
	aking a white character\, that white character isn't designed for white re
	aders. Again the problem here is the idea of universalism. We humans are a
	ll one and the same\, we do not exist\, humans are not the same\, communit
	ies are not the same and what is better for one community is not mandatori
	ly better for another.\n\n	...\n\n	12:56 Dubois is correct but here is the
	 problem. The maker of the youtube video\, most black or white artist publ
	icly state they are not propogandist and if anything publicly despise the 
	notion of being a propogandist. The positive phenotypical integrationist z
	eal among those in the black or non black populaces in the usa is based on
	 the idea that some non propaganda ideal is possible. \n\n	...\n\n	14:22 
	exactly\n\n	...\n\n	14:53 love Milestone\n\n	17:08 exactly\, the reality i
	s\, black created comics must be financed by black people but black people
	 just didn't have the money but do now but just rely on your own\n\n	...\n
	\n	22:18 ok\, if go woke go broke isn't true\, what is it that the woke ar
	tist who made money did correct financially that the woke artist who didn'
	t make money did incorrectly financially\n\n	Was Bitter Root being image n
	ot DC or Marvel matter?\n\n	Was Bitter Root simply better written or drawn
	 than other comics? \n\n	Was Bitter Root wiser in genre choices?\n\n	 \n
	\n
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20251023
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR