BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//InvisionCommunity Events 4.7.23//EN
METHOD:PUBLISH
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
REFRESH-INTERVAL:PT15M
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT15M
X-WR-CALNAME:RMWorkCalendar
NAME:RMWorkCalendar
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/London
TZURL:http://tzurl.org/zoneinfo/Europe/London
X-LIC-LOCATION:Europe/London
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20250330T020000Z
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=-1SU
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20251026T020000Z
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=10;BYDAY=-1SU
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
SUMMARY:What do you think makes a masterpiece?
DTSTAMP:20260101T041610Z
SEQUENCE:0
UID:620-5-c3fe8195a3dde498d013e477e2142422@aalbc.com
ORGANIZER;CN="richardmurray":troy@aalbc.com
DESCRIPTION:\n	What do you think makes a masterpiece?\n\n\n\n	 \n\n\n\n
		My Answer\n\n\n\n	Your prose makes the case for a piece\, but I argue wha
	t makes a master is first? A master originally meant a teacher\, not someo
	ne deemed skilled above all others. Why does that matter? If a master is a
	 teacher\, then a master can be anyone\, sequentially\, a masterpiece can 
	be any work or piece from anyone. If a master is a teacher than a masterpi
	ece is free to be any work as anyone sees it. \n\n\n\n	But\, if a master 
	is someone deemed skilled above all others. then who determines the skills
	\, through whatever measures\, required to be a master is more important t
	han the identity of the master\, for said identity is merely matching the 
	skills. But\, who determines the skills? In modern human history\, all to 
	often those in a populace in humanity  who have a financial or militarist
	ic power over other populaces dictate the skills required to be a master. 
	Sequentially\, the identity of a masterpiece is always doubted\, questione
	d. Because if a master is someone deemed skilled above all others which ca
	n only be determined through a limited perspective only a set in humanity 
	have \, then all others have to doubt it\, because they don't see the mast
	er as legitimate because they don't accept the requirements to master. \n
	\n\n\n	So\, I accept a master is merely a teacher. And as I have learned a
	nd continue to learn from many artists \, in said moments of learning\, I 
	have been taught and said artists have been teachers\, thus masters for a 
	time and the works or pieces they taught me with are masterpieces. \n\n\n
	\n	SEE WHOLE ANSWER\n\n	https://www.deviantart.com/hddeviant/art/What-do-y
	ou-think-makes-a-masterpiece-1281553724\n\n	 \n\n\n\n	 \n\n
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20251231
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR