BEGIN:VCALENDAR VERSION:2.0 PRODID:-//InvisionCommunity Events 5.0.18//EN METHOD:PUBLISH CALSCALE:GREGORIAN REFRESH-INTERVAL:PT15M X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT15M X-WR-CALNAME:RMCommunityCalendar NAME:RMCommunityCalendar BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:Europe/London TZURL:https://tzurl.org/zoneinfo/Europe/London X-LIC-LOCATION:Europe/London BEGIN:DAYLIGHT TZOFFSETFROM:+0000 TZOFFSETTO:+0100 TZNAME:BST DTSTART:20260329T020000Z RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=-1SU END:DAYLIGHT BEGIN:STANDARD TZOFFSETFROM:+0100 TZOFFSETTO:+0000 TZNAME:GMT DTSTART:20261025T020000Z RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=10;BYDAY=-1SU END:STANDARD END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT SUMMARY:Economic Corner 40 05/16/2026 DTSTAMP:20260516T181733Z SEQUENCE:0 UID:735-7-c3fe8195a3dde498d013e477e2142422@aalbc.com ORGANIZER;CN="richardmurray":noreply@aalbc.com DESCRIPTION:Profd made the following posthttps://aalbc.com/tc/topic/1274 8-made-in-china-why-is-it-considered-usa-adversary/And it's primary plus e lemental position is the USA + China are in a financial synergy that disal lows the concept that china is a threat. BUT\, said synergy has two proble ms.First the true relationship of the usa side china isn't financial but m ilitaristic.Second\, the generator of the stated financial synergy is not the usa.Nuclear Powered Countries and moneyThe reason the Nuclear powers: USA/Russia/China/ England/France made the Non proliferation treaty wasn't for peace but control. Non proliferation isn't about saving humanity\, it is about allowing a set of countries\, the exclusive nuclear powers set to be in a class beyond themselves. This is why\, Russia or China who contin uously are deemed similar to Iran/North Korea/Cuba/Libya under Quadaffi or others are never treated like them. The reason is\, the iran's of the wor ld don't have nuclear weapons.Notice the USA has never invaded Russia. why ? Russia has a huge nuclear weapons arsenal. For all the rhetoric about Pu tin or Russian crimes the USA and France through the European Union will n ever advocate a confrontation into russia because no one can guarantee the nuclear weapons will not fly and the damage from a nuclear war will derai l all fiscal activity.But having said that the nuclear powers have never b een allies. They are at war all the time.The only time the usa will not se e China as a threat is when China doesn't have nuclear weapons while the o nly time China will not see the usa as a threat is when the usa doesn't ha ve nuclear weapons.Nuclear war is superior to money/global trade system. M ost countries can't do it and the usa is trying hard to limit the numbers who come in.But USA/Russia/China/England/ France/ISrael/Pakistan/ India ar e all enemies\, they simply have an arrangement because they are in the ra rest class of modern governments\, nuclear powers \, thus must be treated unlike the cuba's \, kosovo's\, others who absent nuclear power\, simply d on't have the weapons to truly threaten the world.Who is the WE in the USA ?The post from PRofd has an initial statement. \"China has been the blue-c ollar labor force for the United States of America (USA) for several decad es now.\"The USA is reaching 250 years soon. I have never denied I don't c are for the usa\, even as a boy. But\, the one thing I have never seen in the usa is honesty\, truth.The usa \, not merely its wealthy or powerful o r its government levels\, but the common farmers\, homeless urban dwellers \, and most others have one disease that sickens me. It is the disease of unstraight lies.The very declaration of independence sto the united states of america starts with an unstraight lie. \"We hold these truths to be se lf evident\, that all men are created equal\"The following is an unstraigh t lie \"We hold these truths to be self evident\, that all men are created equal\"The person who wrote that is a white european enslaving incestual rapist\, but beyond his identity\, the unstraight lies are ever present.\" We\"who was we? who is we? When the writer f the line was composing his wo rds\, was he speaking about native americans\, being massacred? he was spe aking about black people of african descent who are enslaved or their desc endants? Do all humans know all humans are human? yes. But does that sugge st all humans can be spoken for? the answer is never. You can never speak for all humans and thus the unstraight lie.\"All men are created equal\"th e tragedy in this is\, the writer was being honest\, he was speaking of me n\, not women\, but he is unstraight\, he wasn't speaking of all men he wa s speaking of white european men. But moreover\, when anyone suggest that all men created eqaul suggest all humans are created equal \, that is anot her unstraight lie. The two phrases don't connect. All men created equal m eans just that\, not women . All humans are created equal means just that. BUt are all humans created equal? no. Anyone who has seen a child with ce rebral palsy struggle knows\, all humans are not created equal. Are all hu mans human? yes\, but they are not all created equal.Like the one who wrot e the phrase \"We hold these truths to be self evident\, that all men are created equal\" \, Profd in true Statian/ of the USA tradition or heritage \, has created an unstraight lie. The USA has a legal structure which sugg est all in the usa are united in responsibility to the actions of the usa\ , The suggestion has never been true. Again\, who is we? did black towns i n the south want chinese blue collar labor\, started\, in the 1970s when t hey were fighting to get labor from the same white owned businesses that f led to china and its cheaper labor? no. Did Native American reservations w ant chinese blue collar labor \, started\, in the 1970s when they were fig hting to get the legal right to start businesses on reservation land which many still don't have? no. Did fiscal poor white towns in the appalachias want chinese blue collar labor\, started in the 1970s\, when they were fi ghting to get keep their land from state governments who were using all so rts of techniques to take their land for natural resources or other projec ts? no.So who wanted chinese blue collar labor to have the position it doe s int he usa? fiscally wealthy whites. They started in the 1960s to deire this fiscal change to get cheaper labor supported by many\, not all or mos t\, whites who didn't want black people to have any happiness. What a majo rity of whites wanted in the 1960s was for business to maintain investment in white towns/communities in the usa and blockade the non white in the u sa. What a majority of blacks wanted in the 1960s was for business to expa nd their opportunities to blacks while keeping activities completely in th e usa. What a majority of native americans wanted in the 1960s was the rig ht to start business and have native american controlled financial zones i n the reservations that could do business with the business in the usa bey ond the reservations. Instead white owned fiscal corporations moved 99% of blue collar jobs outside the usa altogether\, deleting the desires or pla ns of most native americans most blacks plus most fiscally poor whites. Bu t in parallel said white fiscal corporations created the modern labored an d blue collar populaces around the world outside the usa. The government l iked it\, because it was like a payment for adhering to the governmental o rder of the usa. But the price is today.Everyone in the usa knows what i s aid is true\, but too many in the usa want to suggest unstraight lies.The smallest populace in the usa\, the mega rich chose to manipulate the labor environment in the usa to cut all the blue collar jobs out and place them overseas. but the 99% didn't want that and even after decades\, the 99% s till want those jobs back or have become so resentful that they simply dis like the foreigner. \nProfd argument to the future is instead of complaini ng about what happened in the past against your favor or want\, focus on t rying to make the system \, that you didn't design and is designed against you\, work better for you\, however you can. The idea is adjustment while bitter over resentment. while hateful. The element that dictates the pola rity is patience. The 1% in the usa can wait for change or ride out change s\, whether they want them or not\, \, they have the money or resources. T he 99% don't have the resources to ride out or wait for changes. Which mea ns for the 99% to wait for change they have to embrace a truth\, the chang e may never come no matter what they do\, even working for it every day. T his is a test of patience and I argue\, after two hundred and fifty\, 250\ , years many\, and arguably a majority \,definitely a majority of Black de scended of enslaved \, have no patience to adjust in cycles till finding c omfort.IN AMENDMENTHow can patience be increased in any person or group... by being earned. If a person goes outside their home one day and a person hits them in the face\, they may have patience and come out again the nex t day. But if a person keeps getting punched in the face every day they co me out for three hundred and sixty five days no matter how hard they try t o dunk or punch or talk or fight back or any strategy\, sooner or later\, they will simply stay in the house. Their patience is dried up. In two hun dred and fifty years the usa has never had one place in it\, not one city or town where native americans were powerful\, adored\, loved\, strong\, a ble to protect themselves no matter what\, in control. not one city or tow n where Blacks were powerful\, adored\, loved\, strong\, able to protect t hemselves no matter what\, in control.... yes\, some people native america ns/blacks/whites/females/ males or other have shown the ability to be pati ent throughout their life with the usa. But\, most will never be able to d o that\, we are not created equally\, we humans are not all the same. POS T URLI will post in the commentary to profd's posthttps://aalbc.com/tc/top ic/12748-made-in-china-why-is-it-considered-usa-adversary/#findComment-815 50PRIOR EDITIONhttps://aalbc.com/tc/events/event/682-economic-corner-39-03 242026/NEXT EDITION? COMMENTARY05162026https://aalbc.com/tc/topic/12748-m ade-in-china-why-is-it-considered-usa-adversary/#findComment-81550It seems to me what your suggesting needs to happen in the future is for people \, more people\, the ninety nine percent 99%\, the majority in the united sta tes of america u.s.a.\, to embrace adjusting more positively to the fiscal environment or governmental bureaucracies of the u.s.a. led by the u.s.a. 's one percent fiscal wealthy\, even if they didn't want them\, were unabl e to stop them being implemented\, are suffering under them\, or some nega tive. I can say many people\, various phenotypes/genders/religions/ages/ i n various geographies in the usa have stated similar to you. There is a m ovement of people in the usa who stand with you. Is it a majority? I don' t know\, and I gamble no. In the two hundred and fifty year history of the united states of america\, i argue a majority in the populace across all racial types [phenotype/gender /religion or others] have been impatient o r unsatisfied with the system. But\, the minority in this country has alwa ys found a way with its resources to stop the impatient majority from jump ing to violence to anarchy/a system absent any ruler whether be the law or an individual. Said minority which today includes women plus blacks plus latinos has gotten the majority to embrace stillness\, do nothing which is n't patience it is a calm before a storm\, in which every time the calm is extended the storm gets bigger. Two hundred and fifty year is a long exte nsion. I end with positive... some say strong people lead themselves. I ar gue a peoples goals dictate their actions. Complacency isn't equivalent to weakness\, complacency can occur when one is actually happy with the way things are\, not merely being coerced into activity by others. The proble m with the populaces that make up the majority in the usa is they need to be convinced that engagement will lead to results each populace wants\, so mething that has never happened in the usa. To restate the usa has never had a time in its history where native americans/blacks/whites/ latinos/wo men men/old/young/immigrants/orphans/prisoners/ or others got what they wa nted. Either few win or all lose is what happens in the usa. So the only w ay for that to be undone is an era of leadership . The usa had a great era of multiracial leadership in the 1960s that was assassinated/poisoned/imp risoned/similar injury by a combination of fiscal plus governmental agent s who had something to lose if all groups won. But if a a great era of mul tiracial leadership can happen once\, it can happen again. But\, one must have patience. https://aalbc.com/tc/events/event/735-economic-corner-40-05 162026/ DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20260516 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1 END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR