BEGIN:VCALENDAR VERSION:2.0 PRODID:-//InvisionCommunity Events 5.0.18//EN METHOD:PUBLISH CALSCALE:GREGORIAN REFRESH-INTERVAL:PT15M X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT15M X-WR-CALNAME:RMCommunityCalendar NAME:RMCommunityCalendar BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:Europe/London TZURL:https://tzurl.org/zoneinfo/Europe/London X-LIC-LOCATION:Europe/London BEGIN:DAYLIGHT TZOFFSETFROM:+0000 TZOFFSETTO:+0100 TZNAME:BST DTSTART:20260329T020000Z RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=-1SU END:DAYLIGHT BEGIN:STANDARD TZOFFSETFROM:+0100 TZOFFSETTO:+0000 TZNAME:GMT DTSTART:20261025T020000Z RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=10;BYDAY=-1SU END:STANDARD END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT SUMMARY:Economic Corner 43 08/04/2026 DTSTAMP:20260804T063410Z SEQUENCE:0 UID:794-7-c3fe8195a3dde498d013e477e2142422@aalbc.com ORGANIZER;CN="richardmurray":noreply@aalbc.com DESCRIPTION:PRofd made a post https://aalbc.com/tc/topic/12850-why-are-n on-rich-americans-against-socialismMY COMMENTcontentThe USA has reached tw o hundred and fifty years.Starting off as a fiscal capitalistic country wi th tons of financial imbalances\, regardless that they were legal. .Now a populace\, getting larger and larger\, within the usa seems to want the us a to become what it was never\, a place for all in it to be content.We wil l see\, but I will end with what I always do for all governments anywhere or anytime in humanity.their most negative times are always built in the t imes suggested as positive or acceptible\, their gilded ages\, their glori ous or advertised wins is usually the times where the seeds of the worst t imes were laid.MY EXPANDED THOUGHTScontentThe titular question is \, why a re non rich americans against socialism?The questions are clearG)What do p eople in the USA consider socialism?E)What variations of opinion do people in the usa have in defining socialism?M)What percentage of people\, wheth er citizens or not\, whether americans or not\, in the united states of am erica are opposed to socialism?K)What aspect of the USA implements sociali sm?Before anyone can answer the question \" why are non rich americans aga inst socialism\" \,G) what do people in the usa consider socialism. New Yo rk City has a socialist party\, which isn't the democratic socialist party . NYC also has a libertarian party and green party and others. But what is socialism? I bet socialism is different for the socialist party in compar ison to the democratic socialist party. My point? I am unconvinced that so cialism has a majority accepted definition. And absent said majority accep ted definition\, any question on the populace of three hundred and fifty m illion plus in the united states of america opinion on said idea goes into automatic argument. Cause the point of the titular question is a matter o f opinion from majority consensus\, not the opinion of individuals.E) and what is socialism. Some people think socialism is a system with an absence of fiscal capitalism. Some Don't.M) With so many variations of definition to socialism\, who is opposed to socialism? can it be calculated? can it be known? or is it an assumption?K) Lastly\, where is socialism already im plemented? Some will say the entire welfare programs in the usa are social ism. In Nippon/Japan they are stated as such\, but people don't always vie w welfare programs as socialsim in the united states of america. so...Is t he issuse of the democratic socialist creating a wedge in the party of and rew jackson OR are multividing lines simply being treated with their prope r presence. One of the prblems in many human organizations is the falsehoo d of unity\, the asusmption of a collective united behind something when i t is a group of various tribes or sects who exist through a loose arrangem ent that isn't strong enough to handle all the groups sway. It can be simi larly noted that the reforms or libertarians in the party of abraham linco ln are a similarity to the democratic socialst plus greens in the party of andrew jackson. The falsehood is the structure of the two party system as adequate for all the parts that the two parties try to umbrella . The usa does have a history of parties of governance splitting/dying/merging/muta ting so it is clear that the democratic socialsts and the fdrr corporate m embers of the party of andrew jackson can't survive together forever\, int he same way the Maga and the reagan corporate members of the party of abr aham lincoln can't survive together.I think the donkeys fdr wing feels\, g overnment can be an avenue for fiscal capitalism\, not a tool for socialis m living side by side with ffiscal capitalistic private sector.The reason no universal affordable healthcare \, or universal affordable housing or u niversal childcare has happened is lobbies\, not any party of governanceTh e problem in the usa has always been the faithful or hopeful financial ass essments. Those in the usa who feel a middle always exist or that the usa can change into something are the people who have always pushed the usa al ong. mno matter the race: phenotype/gender/religion/language/geographic de scendency /or other.But the questions are clear.Can the usa be an engine f or fiscal capitalism while fund socialism? The USA has never financially b een able to provide for all who live in it. NEVER.circa 1492 native americ an peoples\, were blockaded or murdered from the fiscal capitalistic envir onment by whites for whites fiscal betterment.early 1500s\, black people w ere enslaved to whites \, so the usa wasn't a place for black positive liv ing.1865 was the end of the war between the states. The UTZ indigenous peo ples were murdered by the federal government from nineteen hundred to nint een hundred and three. The civil rights act whose biggest beneficiary were women was signed in nineteen hundred and sixty five. The USA went to a fi at currency\, not backed by gold in the nineteen hundred and seventies to handle future financial wobbles based on their military power or calculati ve ability.The United states of america has never financially supported AL L the humans in it. NEVER. So how can in the year two thousand and twenty six it change to do so? five hundred years of genocide or enslavement or a buse can not be undone in decades. If it can? we will see. But it is clear that abet against the usa is wisest.The idea that fiscally wealthy people should take less in a country founded by ENSLAVERS is a historical insult . but ford vs dodge prove that it is illegal in the usa to go against prof iteering.The hopeful or faithful in the usa\, after its two hundred and fi fty year anniversary are tasked with the challenging of having hope when t he myths or legends the usa has professed\, from its very infancy\, have t o be called in\, and no cards can even be placed on the table.POST URL htt ps://aalbc.com/tc/topic/12850-why-are-non-rich-americans-against-socialism /#findComment-82849PRIOR EDITIONhttps://aalbc.com/tc/events/event/787-econ omic-corner-42-07262026/NEXT EDITIONhttps://aalbc.com/tc/events/event/795- economic-corner-44-08122026/COMMENTARY DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20260804 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1 END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR