BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//InvisionCommunity Events 5.0.18//EN
METHOD:PUBLISH
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
REFRESH-INTERVAL:PT15M
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT15M
X-WR-CALNAME:RMCommunityCalendar
NAME:RMCommunityCalendar
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/London
TZURL:https://tzurl.org/zoneinfo/Europe/London
X-LIC-LOCATION:Europe/London
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20260329T020000Z
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=-1SU
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20261025T020000Z
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=10;BYDAY=-1SU
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
SUMMARY:The Modern USA's lack of advocacy
DTSTAMP:20260901T183608Z
SEQUENCE:0
UID:803-7-c3fe8195a3dde498d013e477e2142422@aalbc.com
ORGANIZER;CN="richardmurray":noreply@aalbc.com
DESCRIPTION:The problem with most non white european male groups in the 
	usa is white male europeans forced their leadership to be financially impo
	tent advocates. Who didn't work in th ebureaucray or have the money to lob
	by the bureaucracy\, which made their advocacy pure. Their was no profit. 
	But\, in modernity\, all the non white male european groups have bureaucra
	tic members who have replaced the advocates of the past but lack the advoc
	ates of the pasts qualities in poignant agendas\, earnestness in desire to
	 help their specific populace.And that has created in many non white europ
	ean male populaces in the United States of America a rift between their ma
	sses an their elected officials.MY THOUGHTS@undefined @undefined @undefine
	d the key is what separate black leaders in the past from today.Sharpton i
	s a leader\, Obama is a leader\, but all of these people are employees. Th
	e key to Colonel Tye to MAlcolm X is that for most of the 250 years of usa
	 history and most of the 500 years since the white european colonies in th
	e modernly called american continent\, black leaders were unpaid financial
	ly disconnected advocates. They never made money\, didn't have any money t
	o make\, and always had a hill to climb whether violently or nonviolently 
	with whites\, which usually meant they died in terms of agenda\, unhappy.P
	ost 1960s\, the Black advocates were killed or stymied and the Black elect
	ed official came to be the primary leadership in the black populace of the
	 usa today. Modernity has more black\, female\, asian\, latino\, native am
	erican elected officials and yet\, blacks\, women\, latinos\, native ameri
	cans don't have advocacy in the government.Sequentially\, the styles are v
	ery different. Malcolm side MLK jr side Fannie Lu Maher were the last era 
	of a majority of black leaders as advocates for black folk.No money in the
	 advocacy\, no payment in the position. Pure what do black people need. An
	d whether it was through violence like Nat Turner or demographic identity 
	like Marcus Garvey or all the various other movements through the centurie
	s\, the advocates always were thinking about black betterment.Sharpton had
	 or has a show. It doesn't make him corrupt but it is different.If you are
	 going to be an advocate for black people\, you can't be employed by white
	s or financed by whites of employed or financed by the usa government whic
	h primary agenda is the betterment of the white populace in the usa. Regar
	dless of what non white fiscal wealth or opportunities arise. And all thos
	e who are financed by whites\, ala a thurgood marshall/Sharpton/Obama/davi
	d dinkins have impotencies. But all those who are in the system ala Adam c
	layton powell\, can't advocate for black in the system . Adam Clayton powe
	ll fr\, great acts in harlem happened before he was an elected official. O
	nce an elected official he was impotent\, but the reason isn't negative\, 
	simply structural.Government in the usa is controlled by lobbies. What is 
	the point? Lobbies pay to get the laws they want. Who has the money but wh
	ites.Black success tends to be financially opposed by most lobbies \, but 
	the reason is even\, cause most lobbies are white and their white financie
	r is more than likely making money through suffering in the black populace
	.So\, I restate all to say\, No black leader today is like black leaders i
	n the past\, but that is because the past demanded/allowed for advocacy by
	 Blacks leaders as a primary tool. The primary tool for black leadership i
	n the usa today is bureaucratic activity. Today\, a black leader can want 
	advocacy but usually operates within the bureaucracy so they never have a 
	black agenda in their role. And I think the black populace in the usa\, es
	pecially the descended of enslaved\, wants their cake and eat it too.And t
	he reason is many Black DOSers in the USA want the Black community to grow
	 and thrive while they also want the USA to be this land of individuals. a
	nd that is a very hard thing to achieve. And the reason it is hard isn't n
	egatives but truth.What the Native American needs\, even for those that do
	 not want\, in the USA is to the detriment of all others in the usa. I rep
	hrase\, Native Americans should be given large tracts of land back all ove
	r the usa plus tons of back owed money. But that can't happen unless every
	one else takes a financial and communal loss.What Black Descended of Ensla
	ved needs\, even if they do not want\, in the USA is to the detriment of a
	ll others. I rephrase\, Black DOSers need what they have been denied by wh
	ite violence constantly and that is their own governing space\, along side
	 like the native american \, a ton of back pay.What Whites want\, not need
	\, in the usa is to the detriment of all others\, but is historically the 
	sole point of why the usa was created. I rephrase\, The usa wasn't created
	 for everyone to benefit or for each individual to have\, the USA was crea
	ted for a set of white europeans descended from various fiscal poor of con
	tinental europe \, to fiscally succeed no matter how.What modern immigrant
	s want\, they don't need as well\, is to the detriment of all others and p
	otentially all humanity. I rephrase\, what they want is a country that wil
	l allow a stranger to come in and have opportunities or advantages said st
	ranger doesn't have where they come from\, and to embrace their children a
	s part of the country for no other reason than being a human being.These f
	our paths do not work together. Thus all the populaces in the usa are bein
	g poorl led today. None of the leaders can satisfy all four paths through 
	the bureaucracy of the usa governmentREFERRALhttps://aalbc.com/tc/topic/12
	875-march-on-washington-2026/#findComment-83280
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20260901
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
