Jump to content

Tazarah

Members
  • Posts

    9
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Tazarah

  1. Any of the information posted that you disagree with. You appear to be in disagreement with what is being discussed in this thread.
  2. 1. What qualifications or credentials do you have that allow you to challenge, let alone negate or discredit, any of the information from the sources in this thread that have been provided by these collegiate/scholastic institutions? 2. Do you have data or information from any credible scholars or relevant institutions to substantiate and corroborate any of the claims that you are making?
  3. Oops, I accidentally quoted you by mistake. Wrong person. PS, you completely contradicted yourself -- the first paragraph you wrote completely contradicts the last one Lol, exactly... Hello brother, I recently found another elite and legitimate source emphatically stating that the ancient Egyptians were black people -- this time from Oxford University. "Physical anthropologists are increasingly concluding that racial definitions are the culturally defined product of selective perception and should be replaced in biological terms by the study of populations and dines. Consequently, any characterization of the race of the ancient Egyptians depends on modern cultural definitions, not scientific study. Thus, by modern American standards it is reasonable to characterize the Egyptians as "black," while acknowledging the scientific evidence for the physical diversity of Africans." "The Oxford Encyclopedia of Ancient Egypt, Volume 3" by Donald B. Redford, page 28 (2001) Oxford University Press https://www.scribd.com/doc/111594223/The-Oxford-Encyclopedia-of-Ancient-Egypt-Vol-3
  4. Hello brother, I recently found another elite and legitimate source emphatically stating that the ancient Egyptians were black people -- this time from Oxford University. "Physical anthropologists are increasingly concluding that racial definitions are the culturally defined product of selective perception and should be replaced in biological terms by the study of populations and dines. Consequently, any characterization of the race of the ancient Egyptians depends on modern cultural definitions, not scientific study. Thus, by modern American standards it is reasonable to characterize the Egyptians as "black," while acknowledging the scientific evidence for the physical diversity of Africans." "The Oxford Encyclopedia of Ancient Egypt, Volume 3" by Donald B. Redford, page 28 (2001) Oxford University Press https://www.scribd.com/doc/111594223/The-Oxford-Encyclopedia-of-Ancient-Egypt-Vol-3
  5. Very well said. I forgot to mention that in addition to the quote from pages 29-30 that I've already shared in the OP, the very beginning of the UNESCO source that I've linked starts off by unequivocally stating the ancient Egyptians were black africans before it even mentions any of the works/studies of the numerous different scholars that contributed to the source. One does not even need to read the book in it's entirety to see for themselves that the United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization has obviously and undoubtedly ruled that the ancient Egyptians were indeed black africans. On page 15 of the intro, we read: "It is more than probable that the African strain, black or light, is preponderant in the ancient Egyptian..." "General History of Africa: Ancient civilizations of Africa" by G. Mokhtar, page 15 (1991) United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization, International Scientific Committee for the Drafting of a General History of Africa https://www.sahistory.org.za/sites/default/files/file uploads /general_history_africa_ii.pdf
  6. Yes... all great info indeed. Regarding ancient Egypt, the UNESCO source even goes onto say: "...Be that as it may, it is clear that anthropology is far from having established the existence of a white Egyptian race and would tend to suggest the opposite. Nevertheless, in current textbooks the question is suppressed: in most cases it is simply and flatly asserted that the Egyptians were white and the honest layman is left with the impression that any such assertion must necessarily have a prior basis of solid research. But there is no such basis, as this chapter has shown. And so generation after generation has been misled. Many authorities skate around the difficulty today by speaking of red-skinned and black-skinned whites without their sense of common logic being in the least upset." "General History of Africa: Ancient civilizations of Africa" by G. Mokhtar, page 29-30 (1991) United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization, International Scientific Committee for the Drafting of a General History of Africa https://www.sahistory.org.za/sites/default/files/file uploads /general_history_africa_ii.pdf
  7. Henry Field (December 15, 1902 – January 4, 1986) was an American anthropologist and archaeologist. On page 154 of his book "Fieldmuseum of Natural History" (1939), Field states:"Physical anthropologists are certain that Mesopotamia was the eastern borderline for Semitic types of individuals and that the Semites, whom we know as the brown Mediterranean peoples who invaded Mesopotamia from Arabia, did not inhabit Iran at an early date. […] Nor did Nordic peoples speaking an Indo-Iranian language dwell in Iran in early times; the earliest evidence indicating their entry is dated to the beginning of the second millennium B.C. and is based on the mention of Indo-Iranian deities among Kassite gods.""Fieldmuseum of Natural History" by Henry Field, page 154 (1939) Field Museum of Natural HistoryFieldmuseum of natural historySo who were these "brown Mediterranean" people that he was speaking of? In case there was any doubt or confusion as to who these brown Mediterranean people were, an arm of the United Nations, the United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization -- UNESCO -- has already ruled that they were in fact Negroes, just like the ancient Egyptians who were related to them: "The point about all these conclusions is that despite their discrepancies the degree to which they converge proves that the basis of the Egyptian population was negro in the Pre-Dynastic epoch. Thus they are all incompatible with the theories that the negro element only infiltrated into Egypt at a later stage. Far otherwise, the facts prove that it was preponderant from the beginning to the end of Egyptian history, particularly when we note once more that 'Mediterranean' is not a synonym for 'white', Eliot Smith's 'brown or Mediterranean race being nearer the mark'. 'Elliot-Smith classes these Proto-Egyptians as a branch of what he calls the brown race, which is the same as Sergi's 'Mediterranean or Eurafrican race'. The term 'brown' in this context refers to skin color and is simply a euphamism for negro. It is thus clear that it was the whole of the Egyptian population which was negro, barring an infiltration of white nomads in the proto-dynastic epoch...""General History of Africa: Ancient civilizations of Africa" by G. Mokhtar, page 29-30 (1991) United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization, International Scientific Committee for the Drafting of a General History of Africahttps://www.sahistory.org.za/sites/default/files/file uploads/general_history_africa_ii.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...