Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Kareem

Coronavirus patent documents, Trump attempted purchase of vaccine, and mass media manipulation

Recommended Posts

Guest FAS

Dropped in the see what was going on and ran immediately into this thread

 

Real quick (google if in doubt):

 

In 1918 there was 1.5 billion people in the world -

 

1/3 of the world's population caught the Spanish Flu, i.e., 500 MILLION

 

50 to 100 million died world-wide

 

675,000 died in the U.S.

 

One reason the motherland is relatively free of COVID-19 is because foreigners don't travel there as they do to Italy (especially) and China and NEW YORK CITY. The country on the motherland with the most cases is South Africa which has more foreigner visitors than any country in Southern Africa. Hope er'body's doing well. :)

 

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Chev


In the words of the other post THESE ARE THE LAST DAYS!!!

That would be part of my explanation. But I like to say that 'THESE ARE THE LAST DAYS -- OF THE LAST DAYS'; meaning

imo the last days started about 2500 years ago; at the beginning of the apocalypse


Oh yes, I definately believe these are the last days.
But again, the last days of THIS WORLD.
This world and it's institutions are being dismantled to make way for a NEW WORLD.



 

 

 

However, from what I understand

the real 'last days' phenomenon has to do with a great tsunami, mention in prophecy and other things.


Also, if you've been paying attention there's been a number of MAJOR EARTHQUAKES in different parts of the United States lately!

There's clearly a re-alighnment taking place.

 

 

 

 

 

But well, this is crazy, I mean schools are closed for the year!

 

I guess that worked out just fine then because when they closed down the schools the parents were wondering where they were going to send their children while they were at work.
Now that the parents got laid off from their jobs THEY BOTH can stay home together.

But when you want to build a new house you must first tear down and remove the old one, and in most cases this includes the very FOUNDATION of the old one!

The educational and religious systems are the foundations of this world and they must also be dismantled for an effective removal.

 

 

 

 

Well, It's good to know that not all of us quit altogether. I mean, I do absolutely understand why some people may feel it is good

to leave and save peace, but I hope that @Kareem will come back. He hasn't even been here that long. ,

But yes, all things will either come to an end or change. That's part of life. As you say, @Pioneer1 'It is what it is.

This subject of this strange happening is bound to have some people with no good intentions coming into forums, and so that would cause


Well.....
I too hope Kareem comes back, just like I hope Mel, Sarah, and even Cynique ((but only for occasion....lol....can barely stand that girl's mouth)) comes back.

I just dropped a lot of knowledge to Kareem on another thread about the origin of Caucasians, then the nigga turns around and storms out the door before responding to it!

Shit.....LOL.

 



 

 

 

 

@Troy to have to deal with some of these kinds of pranks, but did Troy mean intent against Kareem?

I think not. I have not read the link that kareem posted yet, but, from what I gather, it was the link that Troy referred to,

and I don't feel that Kareem should take it personally. But Hey, I understand that he did not like it that Troy spoke about the link, however,

I hope that Kareem will COOL OFF and come back.


They disagreed on a few things in the posts, but you never know what was said or what type of exchanges were made in the Private Messages.

Both of them (like you ) are highly intelligent and educated but their perspectives on society and human nature are widely different.

Similar to me, Kareem is far less trusting of the system than Troy and based on the LIMITED information I've observed by reading their exchanges (again I don't know the full story) he was very frustrated that Troy didn't share his skepticism and distrust (or atleast as much).
And if my perceptiveness serves me correctly, he probably was a little frustrated with my reluctance to engage much in or take sides in those disagreements.

I'm assuming he's not banned and he can speak for himself, but perhaps Kareem felt as if he was "alone" on this site as most of his positions and figured there was no need to stick around.  As far as I'm concerned his perspectives were greatly appreciated and I actually looked forward to many of his opinions but.....

Hey baby girl, it is what it is.

I just recognize this is the internet and try not to get TOO emotionally attached to anyone on here.






Troy

I can't any more than I can explain to you how the warpage of space/time causes the Earth to revolve around the Sun.

You see the entire planet reacting to Covid19 in ways they do not act in reaction to the flu. You are so distrusting of all the planets doctors and scientists that you would ignore all of these signals indicating how highly cntagious and potentially deadly this virus is and dismiss them as a conspiracy or stupidity. I'm sure there is NOTHING I can say that will help you understand.


It's not the fact that the virus exists and that is' making people sick and killing them that I'm disputing or distrusting.

It's the ORIGIN of the virus as well as the OVER-REACTION to it that I'm taking issue with.

If I'm a detective and I find a dead woman with a gunshot wound to the head, my job isn't to determine what killed her.....it's obvious that bullets kill and she died from one.
The question is WHO killed her and WHY!
And it's the same with this......

WHERE did this virus really come from?
And WHY now?

Again, do YOU....with what you know of world history.....really believe the offical story that a bunch of people in some remote part of China eating bat-soup are responsible for a GLOBAL crisis and what some are calling the modern plague?

Really....do ya?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/1/2020 at 12:24 PM, Pioneer1 said:

Well.....
I too hope Kareem comes back, just like I hope Mel, Sarah, and even Cynique ((but only for occasion....lol....can barely stand that girl's mouth)) comes back.

@Pioneer1

I never left!  I decided it was wiser to spend my time on other areas on this website, where I could help and also learn what others are doing in the book world.

I don't argue with supremacist folks of any shade and for a while this forum (culture, race and economy) was traveling that path.

Calling people coons, uncle toms, ni--ers, colonizers, crackers, (dang there are'nt many derogatory names for Angles that don't include them being in a superior position over black folks, is there? LOL but I digress)-  because of their differing life perspective doesn't help any of us.

Black Supremacy is as hateful as white supremacy.  Hate and fear are way too draining, divisive and mentally harmful.  If we couple that with Alex Jones-type alternative theories especially the unsolvable theories then we're all doomed.  

I'm all for considering alternative theories but if they are not meant to help us evolve then what?  For example, if coronavirus is engineered/modified. - SO WHAT?  A lot of viruses are engineered/modified for health reasons - such as gene therapy.  For years domestic animals such as cats and dogs have been vaccinated against the coronavirus . Are we talking about that modified virus? Anyway,  if we're going to talk about solutions then I'm all in...but just talking about what somebody is allegedly doing to us - makes us victims...and I ain't got time to talk about reinforcing my victimization. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Delano we used to say "psyche" too but I thought saying the entire phrase would avoid the miscommunication you described. I don't think. It is an obscure phase that no one I know used sort of like "flat leava," you know what Cynique did 😉

 

On 4/1/2020 at 12:24 PM, Pioneer1 said:

...but you never know what was said or what type of exchanges were made in the Private Messages

 

I almost never communicate to anyone via private messages.  Any issues I had with kareem I would share publicly.  Speaking of that, @Pioneer1 what do you think about my theory that Kareem was a troll.  You know the kind you find on Facebook formorting controversy and descent. I mean think about it, if you listened to Kareem you would have nothing but hatred and contempt for the United States. Think about some of the things he wrote about stockpiling weapons and going out in a blaze of glory...

 

On 4/1/2020 at 12:24 PM, Pioneer1 said:

Similar to me, Kareem is far less trusting of the system than Troy...

 

Look, you'd be a fool to completely trust our system, but Kareem had zero trust.  If I take him at his word (i.e. not a troll) some of his beliefs were simply irrational. If you believe Black people are immune to the virus, you are irrational, because you'd have to deny the fact that Black people are dying everyday from the virus.

 

On 4/1/2020 at 12:24 PM, Pioneer1 said:

WHERE did this virus really come from?

 

Did you not watch very short video explaining the nature of Covid-19 and how it originated or did you simply not understand it?  OK I see it is not my in ability to explain it is your unwillingness to believe.

 

When I was really young I recall trying to explain to one of my little playmates why Santa could not possibly be real. We lived in the projects and I remember waving my hand across the landscape trying to help him understand how it would be physically impossible for someone to deliver presents to everyone in a single night -- we did not even have chimneys.  He refused to accept it. I mean we were little and this conversation took place 50 years ago, but I just could not understand why he could not accept that Santa could not possibly be real.  @Pioneer1 you remind me of my young playmate.  I heard he became a minister ... a field in which faith in the impossible is required.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Mel

Well hello.
Good to hear from you again!


You speak of Black Supremacy being as hateful as White Supremacy.
I'm going to have to be the judge of that one.....so SHOW ME somewhere where Black folks are in a position to be supremacist, lol.

You don't have take me there, just tell me where it is!
Or send me a map on how to get there and when I go and see this "Black Supremacy" in action (because living in Western society we KNOW what White supremacy looks like) for myself THEN I will be educated enough to make an intelligent decision as to whether or not it's as bad as what Caucasians have established.



I'm all for considering alternative theories but if they are not meant to help us evolve then what? For example, if coronavirus is engineered/modified. - SO WHAT?


Because if it is, then perhaps the guidelines that you're being told will keep you safe MAY  infact be useless or even down right dangerous!
((make your own masks out of handkerchiefs and kleenex???))

Perhaps  you WOULD have done  C while you were running around doing B  had you only known the truth.






 


Troy

Speaking of that, @Pioneer1 what do you think about my theory that Kareem was a troll. You know the kind you find on Facebook formorting controversy and descent. I mean think about it, if you listened to Kareem you would have nothing but hatred and contempt for the United States. Think about some of the things he wrote about stockpiling weapons and going out in a blaze of glory...


Man!
Your last line was interesting as hell because I just mentioned that very same thing in a response to you and Chev on another thread!!!!

But I can't say whether or not the brother was a troll.
I'm in no position to know him or his intentions outside of the limited information what he posted. But when people asked about the use of violence, it was said that the Honorable Elijah Muhammad said it wasn't wise to SAY before one had the ability to DO.

 

 

 

Look, you'd be a fool to completely trust our system, but Kareem had zero trust. If I take him at his word (i.e. not a troll) some of his beliefs were simply irrational. If you believe Black people are immune to the virus, you are irrational, because you'd have to deny the fact that Black people are dying everyday from the virus.


Well, he said he was a Paralegal so apparently he had SOME trust of it because he worked with and within the very legal system.....lol.
But I cautioned him and others in real life about saying "this" doesn't affect Black folks or "that" doesn't affect Black folks because for one thing it IS affecting Black folks in terms of health AND economics AND you never know what type of action you may be inviting.

I remember back in the 80s and 90s a lot of Black men were bragging about how nice and big and round the Black woman's butt is and how flat the White woman's but was. Even singing about it and putting it in rap songs.

White men didn't say shit, they just went up into the laboratory and worked on some chemicals and the next thing you know 20 years later every other White woman you see from 17 to 70 has a big fat shapely ass wagging behind her...lol.
One of the Black man's greatest weaknesses is arrogance and the tendency to brag and this often invites unwanted consequences.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/31/2020 at 10:53 PM, Guest FAS said:

One reason the motherland is relatively free of COVID-19 is because foreigners don't travel there as they do to Italy (especially) and China and NEW YORK CITY. The country on the motherland with the most cases is South Africa which has more foreigner visitors than any country in Southern Africa. Hope er'body's doing well. :)

 

 

Yes!--My husband made this same statement!

 

I missed this thread a few days ago. I was surprised to see MY SISTAS have posted here! 

 

On 4/1/2020 at 12:24 PM, Pioneer1 said:

Oh yes, I definately believe these are the last days.
But again, the last days of THIS WORLD.
This world and it's institutions are being dismantled to make way for a NEW WORLD.

 

@Pioneer1 Absolutely!

 

On 4/1/2020 at 12:24 PM, Pioneer1 said:

Also, if you've been paying attention there's been a number of MAJOR EARTHQUAKES in different parts of the United States lately!

There's clearly a re-alighnment taking place.

 

Now, I read this too, and this is alarming. I mean, there was a significant earthquake in, I think it was, Idaho!?

On 4/1/2020 at 12:24 PM, Pioneer1 said:

The educational and religious systems are the foundations of this world and they must also be dismantled for an effective removal.

 

This is all to obvious! And this is how the scriptures say it:

THE BRIDE AND THE BRIDEGROOM WILL BE TAKEN UP AND THE VOICE

OF THE BRIDEGROOM WILL BE HEARD NO MORE in the great city! That means

that the institution of THE CHURCH will be STOPPED so the deceptive ploys 

thta exploited it for other uses will not be able to use this method to control

us anymore. So, I find it significant that the federal government says that

even the Churches are not to gather!!! The fake pastors cannot collect 

offering in this way for now--so that they can pay for their own extra family members and etc....

using people's tithes for things they should not be doing ...

 

On 4/1/2020 at 12:24 PM, Pioneer1 said:

I just dropped a lot of knowledge to Kareem on another thread about the origin of Caucasians, then the nigga turns around and storms out the door before responding to it!

Shit.....LOL.

 

LOL!!! Don't get me started...

 

On 4/1/2020 at 12:24 PM, Pioneer1 said:

'm assuming he's not banned and he can speak for himself, but perhaps Kareem felt as if he was "alone" on this site as most of his positions and figured there was no need to stick around.  As far as I'm concerned his perspectives were greatly appreciated and I actually looked forward to many of his opinions but.....

Hey baby girl, it is what it is.

I just recognize this is the internet and try not to get TOO emotionally attached to anyone on here.

 

 

I agree. 

 

On 4/2/2020 at 2:46 PM, Mel Hopkins said:

I ain't got time to talk about reinforcing my victimization. 

 

Sista! Yes, this is a challenge for me.

I do not want to express myself and at the same time, also reinforce being a victim

because this will never help to be free from it. 

@Mel Hopkins

 

 

 

On 4/2/2020 at 5:54 PM, Troy said:

I just could not understand why he could not accept that Santa could not possibly be real.  @Pioneer1 you remind me of my young playmate.  I heard he became a minister ... a field in which faith in the impossible is required.

 

Oh WOW! @Troy You struck a nerve when you said this!!!

This reminds me of another post from you about the subject of 'Neanderthals'.

You could not understand why he could not accecpt that SAnta could not possibly be real!?

Troy, I can answer that! Your playmate may have believed it if White Santa and White people told him that SAnta was not real, but

even though you presented a good 'debate' and proof, he just could not see past you being Black...

He could not have Blind faith in  you, but he could have Blind faith in the White people that brought this fake religion

that can't even be based on script. IMO, no one should have blind faith but, faith must be based on some type of 

facts and experience.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Like you said, @Troy

 

“Did you not watch very short video explaining the nature of Covid-19 and how it originated or did you simply not understand it?  OK I see it is not my in ability to explain it is your unwillingness to believe.

 

I gave you a few references on the subject and ‘the definition of Species’, and examples of how species can reproduce, even though scientist flip back and forth on this definition when it comes to the Hominids. If Lions don’t breed outside of captivity with other species, but do in captivity then, like the definition of ‘species’ part of the guidelines is based on ‘defective blending’ and ‘defective hybrids’ that shows up in the form of many sterility, diseases, skin cancer etc. of which these animals do show. But, different species can interbreed though.

 

 

If we humans say that the modern human existed 10,000+ years before the Biblical date of Adam, then that supports what I am saying in that there must have been pre-humans walking around in the Garden of Eden and this planet prior to the Creation of the Nappy headed African YDNA.

 

If scientist say that Neanderthals are ALL extinct, but that all Europeans and Asians have about 2-3% Neanderthal DNA and this is continually being a part of reproduction for thousands of years, then, as a person who has a degree in Biology and understands the Scientific Method then, that sounds like, at best, a contradiction. That may be a theory but not a proven fact.

 

If scientist say that people of African descent carry ALMOST ZERO Neanderthal DNA then, what is their mathematical definition of ALMOST ZERO? Would that be less than 2-3%? LOL. Do we round up or down? LOL.

 

Thanks to about 400 years of Chattel Slavery, many of us Brown African Americans do have traits that scientist say are Neanderthal traits.

 

Scientist say that there are no live humans with the BT Haplogroup. So, if as the scriptures say that all Cainites were drowned in the Great Flood then, that only means that there is no YDNA, but it does not mean that the Cainite presence is extinct, because it can still be here through recessive population.

 

If the FOUNDERS AFFECT shows the Blonde hair/Blue eyed trait showing up in concentrations in populations in Scandinavia and far away in Australia, then that would be a population genetic pool of people that carry a trait that has an origin of a BLACK AFRCAN-TYPED MALE [Nappy headed YDNA] with lactose intolerance in his bones and in the Black Sea region of Anatolia Turkey about 6000 years ago—TRANSLATION CAIN!!!

 

So if this population gene pool would be extinct, then eventually, even African people that can be born with this blonde hair/blue eyed presence would eventually die out do to Natural Selection. It is a trait that has its origin in an African-typed male of the nodeast [northeast] but not the African-typed Southworld males [Sethworld males]. Nevertheless, the dominant presence of the BT haplogroup is completely extinct, but the recessive presence is still here today. Due to it being a mutation, it will not come back, but certain traits continue to show up in a recessive presence.

 

Likewise, this is why I think that scientist are only offering us part truths about the Archaic Hominids species of the Neanderthals. Yes, the dominant presence of the YDNA viable Denisovan-Neanderthal is completely extinct, but in order for certain traits to continue to be passed down through reproduction, then there may be some kind of blending and also hybridization going on due to a population gene pool still present somewhere in this earth. Where? I don’t know for sure, but it is NOT based on color though. Both Europeans and Africans etc. are NOT Neanderthals based on scientific definitions but we are Homo sapiens but we all carry some blending or either hybridization of the Archaic beings. Now there, -- I said it again.

 

I think maybe scientist do not put out the whole truth because of Separation of Church and State and they do not want to agree with the ancient scriptures. They have designed their own form of false religion called Anti-Christ and that doesn’t agree with script. So, I think I have explained it pretty descent, but you just are unwilling to at least acknowledge that I may have a point of view that carries something worth thinking about.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Chev


Now, I read this too, and this is alarming. I mean, there was a significant earthquake in, I think it was, Idaho!?


There were major ones in both Idaho and Utah.

Also, it's good that you recognize that the "Anti-Christ" character is not part of Biblical theology but was actually made up by the early church.
Probably to counter the Islamic influence in the region.

As for your discussion about neanderthals........

You should know that humans didn't come from neanderthals, but rather it was the other way around. Neanderthals were a result of Caucasians who degenerated into a more savage state after they were driven into the mountains.
Eating the wrong foods and mating with close relatives like the Caucasians did for nearly 2000 years will eventually affect the DNA and genetics to the point that you'll produce entire families with deformed and malformed traits such as those found in the bones of neanderthals.

If you doubt this, study the royalty of many European dynasties and how deformed and "weird" a lot of them were because of the custom of marrying and mating with close relatives in an effort to keep the wealth inside the family.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/6/2020 at 10:45 AM, Chevdove said:

Sista! Yes, this is a challenge for me.

I do not want to express myself and at the same time, also reinforce being a victim

because this will never help to be free from it. 

Sis @Chevdove, it is a balancing act! 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

On 4/6/2020 at 1:36 PM, Chevdove said:

I think maybe scientist do not put out the whole truth because of Separation of Church and State and they do not want to agree with the ancient scriptures.

 

OK now I get it.  Chevdove Science is not obliged to support scripture.  Indeed the scripts are often in direct conflict with science if the scriptures are to be taken literally. If you are looking to tie scripture with science you will always run into problems. The whole conversation about Adam and the Garden of Eden is not something I can engage it, because you apparently believe that there was a guy named Adam who was the first person on Earth and lived in a place called Eden...

 

On 4/7/2020 at 10:33 AM, Pioneer1 said:

Neanderthals were a result of Caucasians who degenerated into a more savage state after they were driven into the mountains.

 

@Pioneer1. Did you just make this up? You know, this has no basis in reality right?

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Troy said:

OK now I get it.  Chevdove Science is not obliged to support scripture.

 

Then @Troy Don't focus on scripture, just the science aspect! 

What I wrote about the BT Haplogroup can stand alone! To date, there has been NO live person with this haplogroup but,

just like extracting DNA from the bones of King Tut and any of our recent dead ancestors, scientist can see the distinct haplogroup.

 

Just like the analysis of any bones, scientist have completely determined that about 6000 years ago, there were many skeletal bones

in that region that showed BLACK AFRICAN-TYPED MALES with the blue-eyes and have the same 'science' as blue-eyed people today, 

that are European. 

 

9 hours ago, Troy said:

If you are looking to tie scripture with science you will always run into problems.

 

So, is that why, after about 200 years this American govt decided to Separate Church & State; to save us the trouble of trying to confirm ancient scripture?

LOL.

People love to say this but strangely, THEY CAN NEVER PRODUCE WHAT THAT ARE REFERRING TO!!!

Discussion is good though. I would patrially agree that ancient scripture is difficult to confirm with science, what with all of the deliberate

mistranslations, but it's not good to just leave it at that, imo.

 

9 hours ago, Troy said:

you apparently believe that there was a guy named Adam who was the first person on Earth and lived in a place called Eden

 

You did not read that in my previous post! I said the opposite. I said that there has to have been many 'person(s)' on this earth prior to the creation of the nappy headed man and woman. That is what I said. 

And, BTW, the term 'EDEN' means 'EARTH'!!! Where in the earth was this particular 'GARDEN'? That is what you are not understanding due

to the accepted interpretation of the slaveyard teachings. This particular 'Guarded Den' [ie GARDEN] in Eden is based on 4 main rivers, so says ancient scripture! So yeah, the Adamah lived in 'a place called --THE EARTH--'. Troy, although I don't believe that this is at all intentional, but because of the way that you have been conditioned to think, you are changing my words around based on your preconceived beliefs. I absolutely do NOT believe that the Adamah people were the FIRST humans on this earth.

 

But scientist due say that all males with the YDNA haplogroups, stem from ONE ORIGIN!!!--OUT OF AFRICA!!! 

And, although they lie about the dates and use vague unproven units like BP 'Before Present' based on 1950,

they use the unit 'A' to represent the name of 'ADAM' for all of the BASAL markings that are on ALL NORMAL YDNA HAPLOGROUPS.

 

 

9 hours ago, Troy said:

 

On 4/7/2020 at 10:33 AM, Pioneer1 said:

Neanderthals were a result of Caucasians who degenerated into a more savage state after they were driven into the mountains.

 

@Pioneer1. Did you just make this up? You know, this has no basis in reality right?

 

 

 

LOL

 

 

On 4/7/2020 at 10:33 AM, Pioneer1 said:

You should know that humans didn't come from neanderthals, but rather it was the other way around.

 

@Pioneer1 Yes, I absolutely agree. 

On 4/7/2020 at 10:33 AM, Pioneer1 said:

If you doubt this, study the royalty of many European dynasties and how deformed and "weird" a lot of them were because of the custom of marrying and mating with close relatives in an effort to keep the wealth inside the family.

 

Yes, although I don't understand all of what you say here, I absolutely agree in that the incest did bring about the recessive 'archaic' DNA! 

And also, that kind of incest did lead to a lot of problems, still present today! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Question:

Do blue eyes come from Neanderthals?

Answer:

Blue eyes do not come from Neanderthals, and current data shows that Neanderthals had a variety of skin tones and had different eye colors (including brown). Two female Neanderthals from Croatia were studied and their genome demonstrated a likelihood that they had tawny skin, brown eyes, and brunette hair.

https://owlcation.com/stem/8-Neanderthal-Traits-in-Modern-Humans

 

 

Is haplogroup Y-DNA BT hypothetical?

Grant Lee, BA Honours, History, University of Western Australia (2009)

Updated Oct 14 2019 –

 

...However, genetic researchers have been searching for BT* for more than 15 years now,

and the chances of finding it decrease every day. …

https://www.quora.com/Is-haplogroup-Y-DNA-BT-hypothetical

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Chevdove said:

Troy, although I don't believe that this is at all intentional, but because of the way that you have been conditioned to think, you are changing my words around based on your preconceived beliefs.

 

I'm not trying to change you words around.  When restating my understanding of your position I use words like "apparently" because I'm not sure, but making assumptions based upon your statements.

 

Besides, I'm not making statements based upon my preconceived beliefs.  I'm making statements based upon my understanding of the available science. I have no personal way of knowing that Neanderthals even existed -- let alone have become extinct.

 

All I'm saying is that when you declare that Neanderthals are not extinct rejects all the scientific data we have available.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Troy

Did you just make this up? You know, this has no basis in reality right?


Pretty much, as I've read no other material stating this in it's entirety.
I reached that conclusion due to deductive reasoning based on multiple sources of information.

Are you familiar with the term "Slavic" or the Slavic (Eastern European) branch of the Caucasian race?




Chev


And, BTW, the term 'EDEN' means 'EARTH'!!!


Actually the English word "Eden" is a mistranslation of the Middle Eastern "Aden".
Aden is a city and gulf on the southern tip of Yemen where it connects to Africa (Somalia to be exact).


Yemen Bans Entry into its Territorial Waters


The GARDEN of Eden (Garden of Adan) was in Africa.
Most likely when those two land masses were closer together and connected.

 


 

Yes, although I don't understand all of what you say here, I absolutely agree in that the incest did bring about the recessive 'archaic' DNA!

And also, that kind of incest did lead to a lot of problems, still present today!


Yes, many of the cases of deformities and mental retardation you see today come about as a result of incest because the genes are too close together.
Fathers having sex with their own daughters and brothers with their own sisters.
And not only do the women refuse to abort the fetuses but many of them refuse to even  report their fathers or brothers to the authorities!

That sickness is a remnant from the cave-man days of the Caucasus when it.....like bestiality (sex with animals)....was practiced heavily before Moses and his men went up to the mountains to stamp it out and civilize the savages.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pioneer 

3 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

I reached that conclusion due to deductive reasoning based on multiple sources of information.

 

OK. Why bother conjuring fictional stories that run counter to something that has alresdy been proven?

 

3 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

Are you familiar with the term "Slavic" or the Slavic (Eastern European) branch of the Caucasian race?

 

Dude there no basis in objective reality for a so called, "Eastern European branch of the Caucasian race." This is dervied fromracist junk science and is perhaps why you like using Puerto Rican to describe the way some looks.

 

Yes, I'm familiar with the term slavic.

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/9/2020 at 6:08 PM, Troy said:

my understanding of the available science. I have no personal way of knowing that Neanderthals even existed -- let alone have become extinct.

 

@Troy That is why I posted references about the percentage reported by scientist. I am using AVAILABLE SCIENCE. I understand why you or anyone would doubt even the existence of Neanderthals but, that is the purpose of government(s) and their responsibility on education and their acknowledgment. Truth is not based on us as individuals but eventually and historically, government are contrasted with other governments on issues of truth and confirmed data. Therefore, this government reports info about Neanderthals and other archaic beings based on skeletal remains and DNA analysis, so yes, they did exist based on 'national concensus'. These archaic beings do not match the modern human species at all. 

 

Therefore, scientist are reporting facts about modern DNA, archaic DNA and that yes, there was a contemporary period in which different species did

interbreed and we show this today. 

On 4/9/2020 at 6:08 PM, Troy said:

when you declare that Neanderthals are not extinct rejects all the scientific data we have available.

 

The scientific data available today says that modern humans are continuing to reproduce and have about 2-20% Neanderthal DNA, and I am basing my beliefs on this SCIENTIFC DATA that has been reported and also more (of which I have not presented) regarding ancient scripture.  Now, how am I rejecting scientific data. My interpretation is based on reported scientific data and I believe that the scientist reporting these statements are in contradiction when they do not admit that it can't be possible for Neanderthals to be extinct if we modern humans are still expressing their traits after thousands of years.

 

Well anyway, I also believe that soon you will hear scientist reporing just what I am saying, and that is why I also want to make these statements. I feel that it is important for us as African Americans to address some of these issues that our government is reporting or 'half-reporting' about our past because it has to do with them also exploiting us too. If our 'Black' leaders in the government agree to miseducation then it shows that we are in agreement.

 

Neanderthals cannot be extinct if scientist report that modern humans are still showing these traits through reproduction.

Now, I provided some terminology such as POPULATION GENETICS, the definition of SPECIES, etc. to support why I say this. 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

Actually the English word "Eden" is a mistranslation of the Middle Eastern "Aden".
Aden is a city and gulf on the southern tip of Yemen where it connects to Africa (Somalia to be exact).

 

@Pioneer1 It could be the opposite, in that 'Aden' is a mistranslation of the word 'Eden'. But at any rate, I LIKE WHAT YOU WROTE!

No, I don't believe that word 'Eden' is a mistranslation but 'AEDEN' is a cognate term for 'EARTH' and the word is broad and needs 

to be considered within context.  I believe that both terms 'Aden' and 'Eden' does define, not only that region of 'the gulf of Aden'

but at one point, it included the whole area of 'the Garden of Eden' [ie Guarded Den of Eden], but the actualy area of the specific

Garden of Eden is based on THE MOTHER RIVER, the oldest river at its' source. This ancient river source and the other three rivers that flow 

from a source marks this CENTRAL POINT of AEden. Also, I can see the cognate term because of what you wrote! 

In that region of the gulf of Aden, historians do report an ancient civilization and archeologist have reported many remains! 

 

14 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

 


Are you familiar with the term "Slavic" or the Slavic (Eastern European) branch of the Caucasian race?

 

 

Absolutely not!--But then, that is part of our deliberate miseducation!

For thousands of years, many White Europeans have been through what is known as SLAVICIZATION and we are made to believe

that they want to look like what White East Europeans and Russian look like today, OH, BUT THIS IS NOT SO!!!

 

This ancient term 'SLAVIC' can be compared to today, such as like Kim Kardashian's children--and if they later become adults and interbreed with

other White Europeans--and then become defined as African AMericans!  The term 'African American' in the future would eventually transition to

very light skinned African Americans and then White people embracing our history and then making it a national classification. We, the Original 

African AMericans may be 'erased' and then the term African American would never have been known to define a Slave inheritance based on 

BLACK AFRICAN ORIGINS. And, another way to understand the lie about the term 'SLAVS' would be to see us, African American DOS in that 

many ORiginal people of the African continent regard us as being WATERED DOWN through interbreeding, and although many of us still 

have the dominant traits of being from the Mother land, however, we may not be regarded as being 'Original' by other governments. 

THIS IS THE TRANSITION OF THE TERM 'Slav'.

 

The term 'SLAV' comes from the term 'SLOVENE'--SLOV-VENETIAN--SLOV-PHOENICIAN--BLACK AFRICAN-TYPED PEOPLE initially enslaved byway of the

Roman civilization right there in VENETIAN-ITALY [PHOENICIAN-ITALY]. Both terms 'Slov' and 'Venetian' carry a huge amount of suppressed history.

 

14 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

Yes, many of the cases of deformities and mental retardation you see today come about as a result of incest because the genes are too close together.
Fathers having sex with their own daughters and brothers with their own sisters.

 

I agree with part of this, oh yes. 

14 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

And not only do the women refuse to abort the fetuses but many of them refuse to even  report their fathers or brothers to the authorities!

 

Wow, I never realize this! 

 

14 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

before Moses and his men went up to the mountains to stamp it out and civilize the savages.
 

 

Okay, this makes no sense, again, because the dates of Moses are completely wrong based on what you are saying.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Troy


OK. Why bother conjuring fictional stories that run counter to something that has alresdy been proven


I didn't know the origin of Neanderthals was "proven" or even COULD be "proven" without a time machine.
I thought according to Western science their origin was only THEORIZED based on the archeological evidence they found.

You yourself admit you have no way of KNOWING that they even existed, and you're right.
Neither you nor I KNOW for sure their existence or origin, so how can you suggest it has been proven?





Dude there no basis in objective reality for a so called, "Eastern European branch of the Caucasian race." This is dervied fromracist junk science and is perhaps why you like using Puerto Rican to describe the way some looks.

Yes, I'm familiar with the term slavic


Damn that's a long ass "yes"....lol.

Ok, since you are familiar with the term Slavic and the Slavs, those people are the ones that Western archeologists call "neanderthals" devolved from.

 

 

 

 

Chev

Neanderthals cannot be extinct if scientist report that modern humans are still showing these traits through reproduction.


And they're not!
Just take a look at these people of Slavic origin and tell me what they look like to you.

Meet 5 of the most feared Russian MMA fighters - Russia Beyond Mairbek Taisumov - Wikipedia

 

 


Also, you're correct that the English word "slave" is rooted in the European term "Slav" or "Slavic" but this is because the Slavic Caucasians were the original slaves.
The Arabs would come up through Turkey and enslave them and bring them back to their various empires and that's where the term "slave" came from.

 


Okay, this makes no sense, again, because the dates of Moses are completely wrong based on what you are saying


Probably because those dates you're looking at is based on the "Mythological Moses" of the Bible and not the historical Musa (and his crew) who were sent up from Kemet to the savages and show them the light of civilization.

Matter of fact......
Musa (Moses) had such a hard time trying to civilize those cave dwelling minions that sometimes he had to sleep in a ring of fire at night for protection to keep them off!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/11/2020 at 6:45 PM, Pioneer1 said:

And they're not!

 

@Pioneer1 Thank you!!!

OMG! Thank you. 

 

And, yes, the photos that you posted absolutely shows certain 'archaic' Neanderthal traits!!!--But I would never say that anyone can be Neanderthal completely because we are all so very intemixed. 

 

On 4/11/2020 at 6:45 PM, Pioneer1 said:

the Slavic Caucasians were the original slaves.

 

No. Here you are completely disregarding BLACK ENSLAVEMENT by the Romans. This type of belief that you have that SLAVS are White Slaves in a world that was dominantly Black AFrican makes no sense at all. You have completely thrown down Black African people. The Romans campaigned heavily all throughout Africa to get their slaves.

 

Also, you are completely butchering history. For HOW LONG did the GRECO-ROMANS WAR!!!!!?

Don't you realize those Negroes caught up in these PUNIC WARS!?

These dates and times show a dominant Negro presence as the Greeks went all down into Africa.

Alexander-the-Great became the pharaoh of Egypt. He was all in Africa. The SLAVS were NOT White Slaves.

 

 

On 4/11/2020 at 6:45 PM, Pioneer1 said:

the "Mythological Moses" of the Bible and not the historical Musa (and his crew) who were sent up from Kemet

 

LOL. You are making up stuff. 

Both are of the exact same time period. 

You 'historical Musa' of Kemet is dated to be the very same time period as KEMET records are extremely detailed.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/11/2020 at 6:45 PM, Pioneer1 said:

Neither you nor I KNOW for sure their existence or origin, so how can you suggest it has been proven?

 

Because they have dug up fossils and mapped the Neanderthal DNA.

 

On 4/11/2020 at 6:45 PM, Pioneer1 said:

Ok, since you are familiar with the term Slavic and the Slavs, those people are the ones that Western archeologists call "neanderthals" devolved from.

 

Again this is factually false.  Saying it multiple times will not make it true.  Perhaps sharing something from a source, other than your imagination, might be beneficial.

 

On 4/11/2020 at 6:45 PM, Pioneer1 said:

Just take a look at these people of Slavic origin and tell me what they look like to you.

 

Again, your observations are not a DNA test  Besides these guy are not Neanderthals.  I suspect you would not dare say it to their faces 😉

 

3 hours ago, Chevdove said:

And, yes, the photos that you posted absolutely shows certain 'archaic' Neanderthal traits!!!

 

NO!!!!! 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Chev

And, yes, the photos that you posted absolutely shows certain 'archaic' Neanderthal traits!!!--But I would never say that anyone can be Neanderthal completely because we are all so very intemixed.


I understand what you're saying, but Neanderthal isn't actually a species.
It's simply the modern scientific label for a group of malformed Caucasians.

I know science CALLS them a species, but they are just a group of Caucasians who had so degenerated from living a savage life and breeding among eachother in that condition that it became part of their genetics.


 

You 'historical Musa' of Kemet is dated to be the very same time period as KEMET records are extremely detailed


Oh, so you believe and agree that they are both talking of the same individual?
 




Troy


Because they have dug up fossils and mapped the Neanderthal DNA.


That's not proof, that's evidence.
Not that I disagree with the premise....just pointing out the difference.



Again, your observations are not a DNA test Besides these guy are not Neanderthals. I suspect you would not dare say it to their faces


I would if I was packing that heat....lol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

I would if I was packing that heat....lol.

 

You better be, cause those Neanderthals ... I mean guys are would rip you to shreds. 🙂

 

Seriously, if you believe Neanderthals decended from so called "white" homo sapiens then we can't have an intelligent conversation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/13/2020 at 1:37 PM, Troy said:
On 4/13/2020 at 9:54 AM, Chevdove said:

And, yes, the photos that you posted absolutely shows certain 'archaic' Neanderthal traits!!!

 

NO!!!!! 

 

@Troy Why do you say no!?

Okay, I will provide a reference or two. 

 

20 physical traits you may have inherited from a Neanderthal

By John Worthington for Ancestry – Genealogy & DNA

 ...4.   Supraorbital ridge or brow ridge

 

4-Brow-ridge.jpg

 

 

5.   Broad, projecting nose...

5-Broad-projecting-nose.jpg

 

 

8.   Wide fingers and thumbs...

8b-Wide-fingers-and-thumbs.jpg

 

 

11.   Fair skin and freckles... 

11-Fair-skin-and-freckles-e1419461791990

 

 

13.   Large eyes ...

13-Large-eyes-e1419462261912.jpg

 

The large eye sockets in Neanderthal skulls indicate that they had large eyeballs to fill them.  Antroplogists have suggested that they required larger eyes to enable them to see in the weaker sunlight of the northern latitudes.

https://www.abroadintheyard.com/20-physical-traits-inherited-from-neanderthal/

 

Neanderthal in our skin

Most Neanderthal variants exist in only around 2 percent of modern people of Eurasian descent.... The regions that contained high frequencies of Neanderthal sequences included genes that could yield clues to their functional effect. Base-pair differences between Neanderthal and human variants rarely fall in protein-coding sequences, but rather in regulatory ones, suggesting the archaic sequences affect gene expression. …

https://www.the-scientist.com/features/neanderthal-dna-in-modern-human-genomes-is-not-silent-66299

 

@Troy You have never heard of this kind of data from a scientific source? 

 

On 4/13/2020 at 3:47 PM, Pioneer1 said:

It's simply the modern scientific label for a group of malformed Caucasians.

I know science CALLS them a species, but they are just a group of Caucasians who had so degenerated from living a savage life and breeding among eachother in that condition that it became part of their genetics.

 

But, @Pioneer1 We are ALL intermixed with Caucasians!!! So that makes us defined as the same!!! 

 

 

On 4/13/2020 at 3:47 PM, Pioneer1 said:

Oh, so you believe and agree that they are both talking of the same individual?

 

The date KEMET/Egypt marks Moses is detailed. The term 'MUSA' is recorded in both Sumerian text and Egyptian text. 

This term is used many times and at no time is it applied to your version of Caucasians being stuck behind a wall,

where Kemet sent any MUSA up to the Caucasus to teach them and give them ARYAN CAUCASIAN SCRIPT!? Duh! Pioneer! Lol. 

21 hours ago, Troy said:

Seriously, if you believe Neanderthals decended from so called "white" homo sapiens then we can't have an intelligent conversation.

 

Wow. Okay. I'm scratching my head on this one too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Again, because no one can merely look at someone and determine which traits came fron Neanderthal DNA. This should be obvious.

 

11 hours ago, Chevdove said:

Troy You have never heard of this kind of data from a scientific source? 

 

First, John Worthington for Ancestry – Genealogy & DNA is not a scientific source. Tell me about his "scientific" background please. Second, the article is click bait, designed to get your attention not to enlighten you.

 

You might have noticed the word "may" in the article's title. May implies possibility not not certainty. 

 

I don't think you read the entire artcle from the-scientist.com which 

 

"...researchers cannot yet say how these archaic sequences affect people today, much less the humans who acquired them some 50,000–55,000 years ago."

 

It then spends the rest of the article explaining why. It decredits what you and Pioneerbare saying. I suggest you read it carefully.

 

Neanderthals are extinct and white people did not descend from them. Accept the known science.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Troy said:

First, John Worthington for Ancestry – Genealogy & DNA is not a scientific source.

 

@Troy My question to you was not based on 'just' this reference source, rather I asked you if you had not heard of 'this kind of data from any scientific source'. I posted a quick google search reference of 'John Worthington for Ancestry - Genealogy & DNA' because it is a source that has been published for years and seems to me to be a very good source. So, I regard it as a good 'secondary scientific source' at least. As far as it being a 'click-bait', I don't understand what you mean because the content seems to be a good source, imo. 

 

9 hours ago, Troy said:

no one can merely look at someone and determine which traits came fron Neanderthal DNA. This should be obvious.

 

I totally disagree. I based this on years of research as I do have a degree in Biology and I do understand the Scientific Method, of which one vital aspect is 

OBSERVATION. Not only have scientist published information on this subject and data but it definitely agrees with observation. You are wrong, Troy.

 

9 hours ago, Troy said:

Tell me about his "scientific" background please.

 

Okay, below, I will post some more "scientific" background from other reference sources that report the same findings as the sources I posted previously.

 

9 hours ago, Troy said:

Second, the article is click bait, designed to get your attention not to enlighten you.

You might have noticed the word "may" in the article's title. May implies possibility not not certainty. 

 

Uh uh. This makes no sense to me, how is this article not enlightening if it shows detail examples of what scientist have been presenting for recent years? Some of the picture references are of celebrities of which I do not believe would disagree. So why are you so adamant about denying what has been published? and yes, I agree about the words "May" and "mostly" and "almost" ... used in this study as I did say in other post. The model with the large eyes is well known, the man with the large hands is also well known and etc. 

 

9 hours ago, Troy said:

I don't think you read the entire artcle from the-scientist.com which 

 

I absolutely did! 

 

9 hours ago, Troy said:

I don't think you read the entire artcle from the-scientist.com which 

 

"...researchers cannot yet say how these archaic sequences affect people today, much less the humans who acquired them some 50,000–55,000 years ago."

 

Again, this is my area of study and I can see that are not understanding what is being reported here! Just because researchers cannot not yet say how theyse archaic sequence affect people today, DOES NOT MEAN THAT THEY ARE NOT ACCEPTING THAT THESE TRAITS ARE INDEED ARCHAIC!!!--and that modern humans have these archaic traits, --acquired them through reproduction from interbreeding with Neanderthals!!! The simply do not know the whole complete story, that's all that they are saying here. 

 

9 hours ago, Troy said:

It then spends the rest of the article explaining why. It decredits what you and Pioneerbare saying. I suggest you read it carefully.

 

I did!!! And, I don't know what you mean here about discrediting what I am saying. I am saying that if we today, express these archaic genes then, the scientist are not reporting a complete finding of what they already know. 

 

9 hours ago, Troy said:

Neanderthals are extinct

 

I dont think so.

 

9 hours ago, Troy said:

white people did not descend from them.

 

I agree. I absolutely do NOT believe that White people descend from them. I have said this repeatedly.

But I do believe that we, all modern humans have some kind of blending and/or hybridization--all of us whether we are White Europeans 

or Brown African-typed modern humans.

 

9 hours ago, Troy said:

Accept the known science.

 

Why should I not have an opinion? Because you accept it? You yourself said that scientist update and make changes, so why should I be allowed to form an opinion on what they have reported today?

 

Okay here are some more references and I don't know what you consider a valid "scientific source" but I did post initially that these findings stem from an INTERNATIONAL STUDY of scientist and Stanford University was part of that group. So, therefore some of my source, I believe are scientiic sources such as the NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC organization and some may be secondary sources but they all seem to reputable:

 

 

NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC 

Why Am I Neanderthal?

  

When our ancestors first migrated out of Africa around 70,000 years ago, they were not alone.

 

 At that time, at least two other species of hominid cousins walked the Eurasian landmass—Neanderthals and Denisovans. 

 

As our modern human ancestors migrated through Eurasia, they encountered the Neanderthals and interbred. Because of this, a small amount of Neanderthal DNA was introduced into the modern human gene pool.

https://genographic.nationalgeographic.com/neanderthal/

 

Everyone living outside of Africa today has a small amount of Neanderthal in them, carried as a living relic of these ancient encounters. A team of scientists comparing the full genomes of the two species concluded that most Europeans and Asians have approximately 2 percent Neanderthal DNA. Indigenous sub-Saharan Africans have none, or very little Neanderthal DNA because their ancestors did not migrate through Eurasia.

https://genographic.nationalgeographic.com/neanderthal/

 

"Everyone living outside of Africa today"

This is my case in point. This does NOT mean that NO African person

does NOT have these traits. Many African-typed people live outside of Africa.

_________________________________________________________________________________________ 

 

Okay, here is another "scientific reference"

 

Most people are part-Neanderthal.

That may be a protection against viruses

 

Science and technology

Hybrid vigor

 

 Oct 8, 2018


MOST modern human beings have Neanderthal genes lurking in their DNA.

That is well known. Only Africans, or those of recent African ancestry, are exempt.

 

Genetic analysis makes it clear that there were at least two periods when Homo sapiens

and Homo neanderthalensis (a species found only in Europe and Asia) interbred with one another: ...

https://www.economist.com/science-and-technology/2018/10/04/most-people-are-part-neanderthal-that-may-be-a-protection-against-viruses

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, Here is another reference source on NEANDERTHAL ANATOMY from Wikipedia:

This post agree with my firstreference source from Ancestry Genealogy

 

Distinguishing physical traits

The large number of classic Neanderthal traits is significant because some examples of paleolithic and even modern Homo sapiens may sometimes show one or even a few of these traits, but not most or all of them at the same time.

 

·         Cranial

o    Sloping forehead …

o    Supraorbital ridge, a prominent, trabecular (spongy) brow ridge…

o    Broad nose

o    Bony projections on the sides of the nasal opening, projecting nose

 

Sub-cranial …

·         Large hands and feet

·         Larger round finger tips…

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neanderthal_anatomy

 

 

Okay, and Here is Another Reference source,

maybe secondary source but based on "scientific published works":

This source mentions the Neanderthal trait of FRECKLES of which I presented in my

first reference source from Ancestry Genealogy;

 

 

Science – NBCNEWS.com

Some Neanderthals were redheads

Bones yield genetic data that adds a red hair, light skin and maybe freckles

By Jeanna Bryner

Live Science

Uploaded 10/25/07 3:02:53 PM ET

 

Bones from two Neanderthals yielded valuable genetic information that adds red hair, light skin and perhaps some freckling to our extinct relatives. The results, detailed online today by the journal Science, suggest that at least 1 percent of Neanderthals were redheads….

 http://www.nbcnews.com/id/21474978/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/some-neanderthals-were-redheads/#.Xpd2qP1KjIU

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi @Chevdove writing text like this does not make your points any stronger 🙂

 

Wikipedia is not a primary source of information. If there is a point you like to make, or evidence you'd like to share, please direct me to the source Wikipedia cites; otherwise I'd have to track down the source.  Besides I'm not going to hunt down sources that says Neanderthalss were still walking around in 2020.

 

Chevdoe, I'm afraid you are misinterpreting everything you are reading on this subject.  For example you shared the following:

 

18 hours ago, Chevdove said:

Some Neanderthals were redheads

Bones yield genetic data that adds a red hair, light skin and maybe freckles

By Jeanna Bryner

Live Science

Uploaded 10/25/07 3:02:53 PM ET

 

Bones from two Neanderthals yielded valuable genetic information that adds red hair, light skin and perhaps some freckling to our extinct relatives. The results, detailed online today by the journal Science, suggest that at least 1 percent of Neanderthals were

 

What point are you trying to make here?  How does this prove Neanderthals live among us today?

 

Seriously, maybe the reason you do not believe Neanderthals are extinct is because you do not know what extinct means.  That may come across as condescending, but I can not think of any other reason for you to continue to hold the belief that Neanderthals are still alive.

 

People who have light skin, read hair, and large brows are not Neanderthals, they are homo sapiens like everyone else alive today.

 

18 hours ago, Chevdove said:

 

On 4/15/2020 at 8:54 AM, Troy said:

no one can merely look at someone and determine which traits came fron Neanderthal DNA. This should be obvious.

 

I totally disagree. I based this on years of research as I do have a degree in Biology and I do understand the Scientific Method, of which one vital aspect is 

OBSERVATION. Not only have scientist published information on this subject and data but it definitely agrees with observation. You are wrong, Troy.

 

So you can run a DNA test one someone by merely looking at them Chevdove?  You can look at someone and determine that they have Nethanderthal DNA? That is a remarkable skill unfortunately it is not one you possess because it is impossible.  Sure science involves obervation, but you can not observe someone DNA with your naked eye.  

 

Perhaps this is why so some many people struggle with the belief that there is only one race.  People like to say it is obvious, because we look so different. Of course the science disagree with multiple human races, because one's observations are based upon what one can see, which rarely -- if ever --  tells the whole story.

 

The most fascinating subjects in science to me is quantum theory -- it defies everything we know about the world based upon what we can see or sense on any level.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, Troy said:

does not make your points any stronger 🙂

 

Wikipedia is not a primary source of information.

 

 

 Hey @Troy I agree, however, I presented three other sources, one of which was National Geographic.

 

19 hours ago, Troy said:

Besides I'm not going to hunt down sources that says Neanderthalss were still walking around in 2020.

 

And, again, I already address this point completely, and that is my very position in which I did say that as of now, you won't find that statement in 2020 from scientist right now. My position as repeatedly been that based on what they have indeed reported, I believe that they will NOT report or admit their complete findings. The title of the other references that I did report such as "Why Am I Neanderthal" and "Most people are part-Neanderthal" and "Hybrid vigor"  supports my argument very much so!

 

19 hours ago, Troy said:

What point are you trying to make here?  How does this prove Neanderthals live among us today?

 

My previous statement addresses the point that I am trying to make here. As I also stated, these traits that are still being reproduced today after thousands of years supports my argument in that scientist are NOT telling us the whole truth. I mention the study of Population Genetics, the definition of Species previously to support my argument. 

 

19 hours ago, Troy said:

because you do not know what extinct means.  That may come across as condescending, but I can not think of any other reason for you to continue to hold the belief that Neanderthals are still alive.

 

Troy! Like I said, I just wanted to address this topic because of my area of study and so, as you said earlier about Pioneer, it's not that I have not explained myself but perhaps you are not willing to respect that a person like me could be valid, so I just want to make sure that I have the opportunity to say this first because I believe that one day scientist will make this very claim and then perhaps you will accept it. For you to believe that I do NOT know what "extinct" means after I provided an argument based on me telling you that I do have a degree in Biology and understand the Scientific Method and have applied this principle means that you are disregarding me no matter what I present. But, no, I am not offended and am very happy that you gave me this audience. For that I say, thank you very much!

 

19 hours ago, Troy said:

People who have light skin, read hair, and large brows are not Neanderthals, they are homo sapiens like everyone else alive today.

 

I never implied, ever!--that people with these traits are Neanderthal, that has never been my point. You may be jumping to your own conclusions. But no, people that show certain traits does not necessarily means that they are homo sapiens either based on my argument because I believe certain phenotypes may show a degree of "blending" or "hybridization" that we homo sapiens exhibit but also with regards to "hybridization" that means that scientist today are NOT telling us the whole truth. The presence of "Hybridization" suggest that their is still another "species" present in some type of population--somewhere existing amongst us in this earth, imo. 

 

19 hours ago, Troy said:

So you can run a DNA test one someone by merely looking at them Chevdove? 

 

No, that's crazy. 

 

19 hours ago, Troy said:

You can look at someone and determine that they have Nethanderthal DNA?

 

Oh absolutely!!!

Troy, when you hear news reports about "suspects" and they are described as having "Nappy Hair' then this Phenotypical trait absolutely means that if you ran a DNA test, they will 100% show that they have "African traits"!!!

Modern Humans are NOT the origin of certain traits that Neanderthals posses at all. The origin of the "thick brow ridge" is purely a Neanderthal trait and not all of us Modern humans have this trait. Just like the trait of expressing nappy hair, YOU WILL NEVER SEE A WHITE EUROPEAN WITH THIS TRAIT of Nappy hair!!! Never.

You will see all of us humans showing a degree of a BLENDED TRAIT such as curly hair or wavy hair, but only indigenous African-typed people can express the AFRO!!! 

 

19 hours ago, Troy said:

That is a remarkable skill unfortunately it is not one you possess because it is impossible.  Sure science involves obervation, but you can not observe someone DNA with your naked eye.  

 

Oh yes you can!!!

If you observe someone that is SEVERELY MENTALLY RETARDED then you can be sure that their DNA will comfirm this type of observation!!! 

 

19 hours ago, Troy said:

because one's observations are based upon what one can see, which rarely -- if ever --  tells the whole story.

 

Now that is the truth! You can never determine the whole story based on phenotype! I agree. As one science report stated, today we humans only exhibit part of Neanderthal traits, never the whole. 

 

Again, I appreciate you giving me the opportunity to express my opinions. 

  

And BTW, I am African-typed and I express nappy hair, but Hey!--I love my freckles! And I don't see anything negative about them at all. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Chevdove said:

I believe that they will NOT report or admit their complete findings.

 

Why?

 

8 hours ago, Chevdove said:

...it's not that I have not explained myself but perhaps you are not willing to respect that a person like me could be valid...

 

Yes, I do have difficulty in believing the opinions of people who reject, or cherry pick, science. Sure science makes mistakes, but somethings are not really up for debate. The world is not flat, there is only one race of humans, and Neanderthals have been extinct for thusands of years.

 

If you told me the brontosaurus was not extinct, based on the illfounded belief that scientists were failing to admitting the truth; i word view you the same way.

 

8 hours ago, Chevdove said:

"Nappy Hair' then this Phenotypical trait absolutely means that if you ran a DNA test, they will 100% show that they have "African traits"!!!

 

I don't know this to be true. Some african people don't have bappy hair and some non african people do. Do you know which gene(s) contribute to what you call nappy hair. Are there environmental factord that causes this gene to be expressed? Supposed the person is bald, can you look at them, read their dna sequence, and tell me what the tecture of their hair is?

 

8 hours ago, Chevdove said:

YOU WILL NEVER SEE A WHITE EUROPEAN WITH THIS TRAIT of Nappy hair!!! Never.

 

Just a couple nappy headed white boys for your review.

 

bob-ross-9464216-1-402.jpgAG_AlbumL.jpg

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, Troy said:

ust a couple nappy headed white boys for your review.

 

Oh my gosh! @Troy The two picture references clearly show these White/European 'boys' men that you posted do NOT have nappy hair!

Plus, I have already researched the first one you listed and he confirmed that he has PERMED his hair!!!

He is a well known artist many times featured on the PBS channels. And likewise the second pic you posted shows curly hair.

 

bob-ross-9464216-1-402.jpg

 

Again, this famous artist featured on PBS channels admits that he chemically PERMS his hair!!!

 

Nappy hair--bushy hair--kinky hair-- frizzly hair... is exclusively the DNA of ORIGINAL AFRICAN PEOPLE. And I repeat, YOU 

WILL NEVER FIND A WHITE EUROPEAN WITH NAPPY HAIR!!! LOL.

 

21 hours ago, Troy said:

Do you know which gene(s) contribute to what you call nappy hair.

 

I know that the Basal A Y base haplogroup would be the DNA MARKER for this Nappy hair and because genes tend to travel in pairs and 

it linked to melanin, this NAPPY HAIR GENE will only remain with the Original African people.

21 hours ago, Troy said:

Are there environmental factord that causes this gene to be expressed?

 

No. Absolutely not.

 

21 hours ago, Troy said:

Supposed the person is bald, can you look at them, read their dna sequence, and tell me what the tecture of their hair is?

 

Not always but because genes tend to travel in pairs, it would be pretty easy to see a Black African-typed man like youself and pretty much know that you had either nappy hair or a COMBINATION HAIR TYPE, meaning a mixture of bushy type and/or curly type hair!!! And, a European/White man who is bald would never have had nappy hair at all! Black AFrican American men who show patterns of baldness are dominant in East Africa for a significant reason and I hope to share my research on that one day. These type of Black men also tend to have daughters with a beautiful head of 'combination-type hair'. As I told you before, baldness is an incredible 'blessing' and again, I hope to share my research on that one day. 

 

21 hours ago, Troy said:
On 4/17/2020 at 8:04 AM, Chevdove said:

I believe that they will NOT report or admit their complete findings.

 

Why?

 

Because of White Supremacy which is more dominant than the well meaning Eurpean population! That's why. the minority European scholars are acting 'scared chicken' and are afraid to go against their government and print the truth about Neanderthal origins like they know that they should do. So, they spend a lot of wasted time getting together on an 'international level' and getting approval for what the big governmenst will allow to be publicized and what they won't allow to be publicized. That's why. It took them years before they even reported about their findings on Neanderthals for what they did allow. And when they did, they mixed in a lot of Bullsh*** about mtEve and a lot of other useless stuff. But it's their soul. It's hard for them all to admit that they come from 'ONE' origin and that of an African male!!! That is the origin of ALL MODERN MALEFACTORS today with the Straight Y-dna haplogroups. PERIOD. Neanderthal were intersexed and their Ydna has not been mapped but we know they were here, we know they reproduced with females.

 

21 hours ago, Troy said:

Yes, I do have difficulty in believing the opinions of people who reject, or cherry pick, science.

 

I dont believe that I cherry picked science. and, a lot of scientist 'reject' certain findings for specific reasons. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...