Jump to content

Energy

Members
  • Posts

    16
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Energy

  1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ewe_language This is my last comment. I am out of here. The dishonesty is too much for my liking .
  2. LOL. I am answering your questions by going back to the history of the Transatlantic slave trade to show how ridiculous your position is in denying events in history that sounds unpalatable to your ears. Take a look at the quote and compare it to the attached below, which is a screenshot of your last statements. Can you see the SIMILARITY in the question I asked? What you say is a totally different question is exactly the SAME QUESTION I have been asking you throughout. You have even highlighted it in red, which is very helpful. It shows CLEARLY that all I asked you was, show when and where those Europeans involved in the Transatlantic Slave trade, ever in their History engaged in human trafficking BEFORE arriving in West Africa. It is there, you can see it because you yourself highlighted it in RED. You run from answering the question and now accusing me of engaging in a strawman. No Sir, I am not. Below is the EVIDENCE and it is pitched against you. It is damning.
  3. What is this? Did you understand the question? I asked for EVIDENCE that says any of the said countries had engaged in human trafficking BEFORE they came to Africa? Europeans first set foot in West Africa in 1471. I am asking you when in their History before 1471 did any of the Europeans nations that took part in the Transatlantic Slave Trade ever in their history engage in Human trafficking? That is the question I asked and you kept insisting that there is documentary evidence that they did. Show me this evidence? Let me make the question simple for you. Before 1471 when Europeans first set foot in West Africa, did any of the Countries involved in the Transatlantic Slave Trade ever engaged in human trafficking in their history? Yes or No?
  4. Show me or refer me to these Historical documents please. These claims tells me you are unaware that Africans called MOORS ruled the Portuguese and Spaniards for 800 years. I know the History of these people from the time they first became nations starting from the Visigoths, Saxons, Celts, Gauls and the Vikings. I never read anything like you are claiming in their History so I find your claims intriguing. So can you mention or point me to these alleged historical documents that said they engaged in slavery or human trafficking any time in their history? What i am asking from you is the HIGH STANDARD, Historians like myself approach a subject before accepting any such claims as proof or fact. Provide the EVIDENCE.
  5. I am curious to know what evidence you have to support this statement you made. Not all Caucasians engaged in the Transatlantic Slave Trade. Those who did were namely, French, British, Danes, Dutch, Spanish and the Portuguese. Can you show me any time in History that these mentioned nations ever engaged in human trafficking/slavery?
  6. There is no evidence that is tenable if we deny the history that came with the said evidence. The evidence and the source are from the same stable. You can't pick and choose. Thus, as far as I am concerned, going by your reasoning, the Transatlantic Slave Trade never happened because we have NO EVIDENCE in Africa to say that it did. The dungeons in those Forts and Castles were for prisoners who were later released. In fact, the EVIDENCE we have strongly speaks against any such event happening. A few Europeans could not visit Africa thousand of miles from home and shipped off millions of alleged HELPLESS Africans to another country as slaves. That is just IMPOSSIBLE. Also, the Caucasians have no history of ever engaging in human trafficking before they set foot in Africa. The purpose for coming to Africa was to find an alternative route to India and trade in minerals. They had no prior knowledge of human trafficking. No time in their History did the British, Danes, the Spanish, the Dutch and the Portuguese engage in slavery. Thus, any suggestion that all of a sudden, out of the blue, they suddenly transformed into monstrous slavers is preposterous. The black people in America have always been natives of America. Some of your own fellow African-Americans have confirmed this. The giant statutes with Negroid features found across America attest to this as fact. This, my friend, is the conclusion we arrive at if you want to rewrite history by denying EVERYTHING from our Oral History and from the history books. Finally, you seem to have a very unhealthy and distorted view of white people. Just as white people hate the KKK (racist whites), likewise the majority of black people hate their version among black people.
  7. You said and I quote: What EVIDENCE? Are you contradicting yourself? History is information based on eye-witness DOCUMENTED accounts. Failing that it is called a myth. But you wanna put a new spin on the meaning of History to say if we did not see it with our own eyes, it can not be called History. Now you wanna talk about EVIDENCE? Evidence from where if we did not witness the so-called Evidence? Going by your reasoning the evidence will also be bogus if it was not witnessed by the living.
  8. Going by how you deny history, EVERYTHING from the past is false because we never saw it with our eyes, right? Okay, I have seen this game before. For example, there are Africans who say the Transatlantic Slave Trade never happened. Likewise, there are African-Americans who say Blacks have always lived in America and that the story of the Transatlantic Slave Trade is false. It never happened. If we go by your reasoning, because we witnessed none of these historical events, they are false. Okay! Have it your way. The past never happened because we never saw any of it with our own eyes.
  9. Facts of History usually don't make pleasant reading. Below is a link to one of the many barbaric acts about Human Sacrifice and the primitive traditions that fuelled the slave trade. It is no secret that European Colonialists went to WAR with our African ancestors to force them to stop these evil practices. Most of the accounts were from EYE-WITNESSES and backed up by Oral traditions. I am not telling you these things for the fun of it. I am making you are aware of them because they are the identifying marks God put on the Hebrews to IDENTIFY them in exile. You can read about the identifier curses in Deuteronomy 28. Every horror mentioned in there was fulfilled in Africa. GEZO - Human Sacrifice in Dahomey
  10. You said, and I Quote: You are being very rude. I am a leading Historian of my people. I have written books on my people's history to educate ignorant people like yourself. Without my books, I doubt someone like you will know anything about your African roots. So, I suggest you mind your language. Below is a link to one of my books. Follow the link to read the Reviews to see what your fellow African-Americans view and VALUE the knowledge I bring to the table. If you can not be polite, I suggest you find someone else to play with. Thank you! The Bible is the Black Man's History book
  11. LOL! I told you I am an ERVERH. We usually write the name as EWE because the VHWERH sound in the pronunciation of our name is not in the English alphabet. To compensate, we substitute the letter W where the sound should appear. The result is EWE. Nevertheless, the best was to help you pronounce the name is to write it out, which is ERVERH. Our territory stretches from the Ga-Adangbe Region in Ghana all the way to Lagos in Nigeria. During the Transatlantic slave trade, our region was called the Slave Coast because most of the slaves to the Americas were from the region. This territory is now divided between four Countries, namely Ghana, Togo, Republic of Benin and Nigeria. Anyway, back to the point I was making, "European colonisation saved us from many of the terrible practices we the natives were practising, which included Slavery, Cannibalism and Human Sacrifice. We were not manipulated and exploited through colonization, as you claim.
  12. You said and I quote: LOL! Not in in Central or West Africa. European colonisation saved us from many of the terrible practices we the natives were practising, which included Slavery, Cannibalism and Human Sacrifice. If you disagree, then I will love to see your EVIDENCE to the contrary
  13. LOL! I will start by answering the last part to wrap up everything else you wrote. You asked if I know the mean on the name Israel. Yes, I do. The original name is Yershiral. It is an Akan African word and it means, "blessing." This was what Jacob asked from the Angel - a blessing. Before you ask, how do I know that? The answer is, "Yes," I am African. Most Bible words are written in my native language, which is pronounced ERVERH. The word ERVERH is the ORIGINAL Name of the ancient Israelites. The Greeks wrote is as IVRAIKI. The Romans then translated that as Hebraic, which finally translates in English as Hebrew. Because I am ERVERH, I know the real meaning of most words in the Original Text of the Bible. The original name of Israel is Yershiral and it means BLESSING. So to wrap up, the following verse is the fulfilment of prophecy. We are the ERVERH people aka the Hebrews, and we are in Sub-Sahara Africa, West Africa to be precise. "From beyond the rivers of Cush My worshipers, My scattered people will bring Me an offering." Zephaniah 3:10
  14. Granted you did not write the Bible but the information and the meaning is very clear, "my scattered people" means the Hebrews in exile. So the verse is saying the lost tribes of Israel are in Africa. Most sub-Sahara Africans are the ancient Israelites. They relocated to Africa when Nebuchadnezzar and his Babylonians destroyed ancient Israel 3000 years ago. Sub-Sahara Africans are Negroes. This means the ancient Israelites were Negroes. The image below was left in antiquity by the Assyrians who took a section of the Israelites into exile. As you can see by the dreadlocks, they are black people. These are the FACTS based on history and archaeology. Thus, it is not false information or wishful thinking, as you called it. I base it on in-depth knowledge and I have written SIX best seller BOOKS on the subject.
  15. Hello Pioneer1. Thanks for the welcome. How do you explain the verse below which says the lost tribes of Israel are in sub-Sahara Africa? Is that what you term false information and wishful thinking? "From beyond the rivers of Cush My worshipers, My scattered people will bring Me an offering." Zephaniah 3:10
  16. The Bible is the book written by our black ancestors, became lost, found by Europeans, and who returned it to us. Read more at the Black History Knowledge site Many sub-Sahara Africans, are the twelve tribes of Israel in exile. The Hebrews are not lost. The Bible makes it abundantly clear they are in sub-Sahara Africa. Consider the following verse. "From beyond the rivers of Cush My worshipers, My scattered people will bring Me an offering." Zephaniah 3:10 So there you have it. The Israelites are in the Land of Cush, which is sub-Sahara Africa. They fled there when Nebuchadnezzar and the Babylonians destroyed ancient Israel 3000 years ago. This means all the people transported as Slaves out of Africa during the Arab and the Transatlantic Slave trade are all Hebrews in exile. Find out more by reading the information at the link on black history knowledge
×
×
  • Create New...