Jump to content

What is the most financially successful black character created by a black artist?  

  1. 1. Are the strongest properties owned by the major film studies in the usa unable to be turned into the multiracial properties said studioes want?

    • yes
      0
    • no
      0


Recommended Posts

Posted

What she misses is a crossroads of three things. First, the studios want to maximize profit, which means they want to use media properties they already own and attract the most sales. Second, the properties studios own are quite old, decades old, centuries old and tend to be created by white people of european descent filled with mostly characters described in appearance or culture as white of european descent, which has the problem of not being as attractive to non whites than non white characters. Third, the modern buyers of media content are not overwhelmingly , overwhelmingly meaning seventy five percent or more , of white European descent and the studios want to cater to them. 
The three elements show the problem. The studios always want to save money+ not risk money, which means the studios are not going to buy new non white European characters or use lesser known non white European characters that many, including many non whites of European descent, don't know. 
So with the desire to maximize profits + risk least investment revenue this means changing white European characters they already own into non white European characters is most efficient.
This is what I think many, Black or non black are missing.  When I think on most popular movies in the last thirty years, few are of a new property. Every star wars/star trek/marvel/dc film is of an old property. Every biopic is of an old property, that being a famous person. Little that makes the most money is new, is unheard of. 
Even nosferatu which has made a splash is again, is old. So, if old properties are the fans are buying, and all the old characters owned by studios is white, simple arithmetic to save money or risk less revenue is to change characters already owned to fit the non white European buyer. 
And again, prove the studios wrong, not with artistic judgement videos or human communal statement videos but by sales. 
Consider DC has access to Milestone and yet, it never occurred to them to give milestone characters their own movies. Here is a comic imprint made by non white Europeans, mostly blacks, that has a gallery of non white European characters made by non white Europeans. DC made birds of prey changing white European descent characters. 
Marvel treats black panther as their non white world movies. Black panther 1 had more black people in an action sci fi adventure than ever before. black panther 2 added first peoples of the Americas taking namor the submariner and changing his character's design dramatically. But this was cheaper, and the profits prove the studios right. 
The biggest problem with this issue is, and I can speak of this as a writer. New characters or lesser known characters haven't proven to have big money legs. Notice I didn't say they couldn't they haven't proven it. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Czf2k-WJ6iU


MY COMMENT
The problem the studios have is they want to always save money + risk the least revenue developing+ gain the most buyers in modernity which has many more buyers not of white european descent than ever before, and based on financial results of films, year in and year out, it only leads to one conclusion and that is race swapping. To restate my point, the financial returns of the film industry prove their race swapping actions correct, against other options. 

TRANSCRIPT

0:00
before we get started I have a brand new
0:02
short film that is releasing on this
0:04
channel very soon I love this short film
0:06
I think it's the best one I've done yet
0:07
and I really need your guys' help for
0:09
feedback for this short film so if when
0:12
I drop it which is going to be before
0:14
the end of January I would really
0:16
appreciate if you would give it a watch
0:18
and please I highly recommend you watch
0:21
this short film to the end because it's
0:23
the best one I've done so far so without
0:25
further Ado let's get on to the video
0:27
one of the big controversial things
0:29
that's been going on and talked about a
0:31
lot for years now is racebending
0:34
characters and I haven't really thrown
0:37
my hat in the ring to talk about it yet
0:39
other than saying you know talking about
0:41
things like Batman cape Crusader that
0:43
just because you race bend a character
0:45
does not mean that the show is going to
0:47
be bad or that it needs to affect
0:49
anything but there were a couple maybe
0:52
three things that I read and that had
0:54
happened that made me finally want to
0:57
make this video because something really
1:00
got under my skin regarding this entire
1:03
conversation now race bending characters
1:06
it's very controversial does it ever
1:08
affect story is it wrong to ever race
1:10
bend a character we've seen it happen a
1:13
lot with some very iconic characters
1:15
lately that they get race Bend and it
1:17
causes a lot of tension and infighting
1:20
over this now when I was growing up
1:22
there were a lot of projects that did
1:25
have technically race bent characters
1:27
that I loved one of my favorite movies
1:30
growing up and what I think might even
1:31
be the best adaptation of Cinderella
1:34
ever was with Brandy and Whitney Houston
1:37
when they did the Roger and Hammerstein
1:39
or Stein's version of it and that was an
1:41
insanely successful movie when it aired
1:44
on TV and I loved watching it growing up
1:46
also in my teen years getting into the
1:49
Avengers and all that you had Samuel L
1:51
Jackson as Nick Fury and that is a race
1:53
bent version of the character from the
1:56
comics but everyone seemed to love
1:58
Samuel Jackson as Nick I don't remember
2:00
there being any sort of controversy over
2:03
it and so you can see that in the past
2:06
there were these times when race bending
2:08
a character would not be a big deal and
2:12
most people I think just assumed you
2:13
must have gotten the right person for
2:15
the role and would go from there but
2:18
however I would like to point out for
2:19
something like Nick Fury in uh The
2:22
Avengers I don't doubt that there was
2:24
some conversation behind the scenes
2:26
going on about you know the Avengers the
2:28
original six were six white people let's
2:30
get somebody in here who's non-white
2:32
somebody like a high caliber actor so um
2:36
we can maybe get a different sort of
2:38
audience because Hollywood has had that
2:39
thinking of for decades that they need
2:41
to introduce non-white characters to get
2:44
different demographics to hopefully
2:46
watch their film so that was the way it
2:49
was it wasn't really seen as a big deal
2:51
and I think we just went through a
2:53
period of time when racebending any sort
2:55
of character like it it didn't really
2:57
seem to anger people enough or make that
3:01
much of a controversy for Hollywood when
3:03
they did it for example you had Jessica
3:05
Alba as a Latina actress um playing Sue
3:09
storm who's a white character they did
3:11
make her wear makeup to whiten her face
3:14
a bit and that would not fly today you
3:16
had oh I can't remember the name but
3:18
Michael Clark Duncan but he did a RAC
3:20
bement version of Kingpin for Ben
3:23
Affleck Daredevil and then you have um
3:26
ight Shyamalan decided for whatever
3:28
reason to get white actors to play the
3:30
characters in his Avatar movie which I
3:34
definitely do not approve of because you
3:37
know you should have gotten Asians to
3:39
play Asian characters but anyway uh for
3:42
whatever reason he got away with it at
3:43
the time and so I think that that just
3:45
shows that there was a time in history
3:48
where race bending was just like for
3:50
whoever it was being done to it was not
3:52
seen as such a huge deal that it would
3:54
prevent it from happening in the first
3:55
place and this was after a time where
3:57
decades ago it used to be very difficult
3:59
for for a non-white actor to get a good
4:01
role it there there were very very
4:03
limited roles back then decades ago and
4:06
if you go and listen to actors doing
4:08
interviews it was very limiting the
4:10
kinds of roles they were offered if you
4:11
weren't a white person so we can see how
4:13
it's changed over time but now uh the
4:17
race bending of White characters has
4:19
become super controversial and why is
4:23
that well because they've pushed it so
4:25
hard and they've pushed it in such a way
4:27
that it's in ently cause tension like
4:31
for example um another thing I can say
4:34
growing up is that there used to be some
4:36
cartoon characters that occasionally
4:37
would be raceman like Liz Allen from
4:40
spectacular Spider-Man that cartoon in
4:42
the original uh comic she is a Caucasian
4:45
blonde girl and they made her a Latina
4:48
in the cartoon and I never had a problem
4:51
with that I enjoyed that version of Liz
4:53
Allen and I never heard anyone who
4:54
didn't have a problem with that and why
4:57
well Liz Allen that look for the
4:59
character it isn't as well known and so
5:01
I don't think people notice it as much
5:03
also there was justification and once
5:05
again they've been trying to
5:07
diversifying things like that for years
5:08
now but there was justification for Liz
5:10
Allen because she was another white
5:13
blonde character from Spider-Man she had
5:15
the same look as Gwen Stacy so changing
5:18
her per race making her look different
5:20
that it just it just act added an actual
5:23
diversity to the cast so that every
5:25
character had their distinct look
5:26
different ethnic background and I think
5:28
that that really worked another
5:30
character that was race bent in a
5:32
cartoon X-Men evolution Amara AKA magma
5:35
she was a character who was another
5:37
Caucasian blonde from the comics but
5:39
there were already a lot of Caucasian
5:41
blondes on the New Mutants team that she
5:43
originated from and they made her Latina
5:46
in X-Men evolution and once again
5:48
probably trying to diversify with that I
5:50
thought it worked though you know it was
5:52
helpful the characters all have their
5:54
distinct looks I actually really like
5:56
that version of Amara so you see in the
5:58
past it can work and not cause
6:01
controversy so how did race bending
6:03
characters start to become so
6:05
controversial for a couple different
6:06
reasons number one you'll notice when it
6:08
comes to characters like magma or Liz
6:11
Allen these were characters that weren't
6:13
very well known or I would even say in
6:15
the case of Nick Fury it was a
6:17
combination of even Nick Fury wasn't
6:19
that well known also um back then they
6:21
didn't do race bending as much they
6:23
didn't push it as hard I don't think
6:25
that people expected anything other than
6:27
they probably just got the right actor
6:29
for the role
6:30
but the problem that has happened these
6:32
days is they have been doing it to more
6:34
and more iconic characters like Mary
6:37
Jane Watson that is a character who is
6:39
very very iconically a redhead a white
6:43
redhead that is an iconic look for the
6:45
character it is really it really defines
6:48
her so when you did that when you cast
6:51
Zena as the character in culture
6:53
Michelle Jones but she's sort of pseudo
6:55
MJ it caused a lot of backlash and this
6:58
is what you see
7:00
when they race Bend characters that are
7:02
more wellknown why well because people
7:04
have an expectation for the character to
7:07
look like they do in the source material
7:09
when it's that iconic like I would say
7:12
the same thing and I've talked about
7:13
this before when it comes to like you
7:15
know Brandy and Cinderella I love that
7:17
movie I love her take on Cinderella
7:19
Cinderella is a story that's been told
7:21
by every culture every ethnicity it
7:23
really doesn't matter fairy tales can be
7:25
a lot more loose than that and I would
7:27
say the same for a lot of the fairy tals
7:30
from Disney but and while I would say
7:33
please like no one should attack the
7:34
actors and actresses over this stuff I
7:37
do think that Disney has set up their
7:39
actors and actresses up to fail when
7:42
they choose to race Ben characters in
7:44
their liveaction Disney movies why well
7:47
because while you can tell a new story
7:50
with these characters and these versions
7:52
but there with the Disney Live Action
7:54
remakes with the people who watch them
7:56
they want the whole thing with them is
7:58
that they're shot for shot remakes of
8:00
the original they're supposed to be
8:01
remakes of the original so when you set
8:03
up the expectation that this is Ariel
8:05
for example in the RAS B that character
8:08
then you start to cause controversy
8:11
there is why doesn't this character look
8:13
the way she does in the original and
8:15
does it matter that much well in this
8:18
case when I'm talking about the little
8:19
mermaid no it doesn't there's no reason
8:21
why someone couldn't play a good version
8:23
of uh The Little Mermaid that's a
8:26
different race but the problem with it
8:28
is that here's what happens you'll get a
8:30
character like Mary Jane or Ariel or
8:33
whoever it is you'll get a character
8:34
where people have a certain expectation
8:36
of how they're supposed to look uh based
8:39
on how they were from the source and
8:41
people might be critical because it
8:43
doesn't look the way that it does in the
8:44
source and that's just fandom you know
8:47
like fans want things to look the way
8:49
they were in The Source material they
8:50
want events to play out the way they did
8:52
in the material uh we'll have more
8:54
examples of that in a minute but like
8:56
that is a part of fandom when they
8:57
things are iconic from the mat material
9:00
The Source material they want that to be
9:01
reflected and here's what I've seen
9:03
happen over and over and over again in
9:05
the past decade is that they will they
9:07
will race been an iconic character
9:09
people will get upset by it and then the
9:12
response will be like you're just racist
9:15
like the only reason why you could
9:17
possibly dislike this change or find it
9:19
questionable or just not be really into
9:22
it is because you're are racist you just
9:25
cannot stand seeing a black person get a
9:28
role like this get a big role like this
9:31
and that is the only reason why you
9:33
don't like it and so because disliking
9:36
something like that gets you called a
9:37
racist you know that's a very
9:40
inflammatory terrible word to call
9:42
someone or to be accused of that in
9:45
invites anger that invites Anger from
9:47
the people who initially perhaps just
9:49
wanted a character to look the way they
9:51
did in the source material and now all
9:53
of a sudden they are in have been called
9:55
an inflammatory term that creates anger
9:57
that feeds it back to more anger at the
10:00
person that they cast in the role where
10:02
it was race bent which indeed I I
10:04
imagine I can I don't have to imagine
10:06
the people who' have been casting these
10:08
roles do not like having anger pushed
10:10
back at them so that will come back to
10:12
the way that they communicate with the
10:14
fan base or the audience and so on and
10:17
on and on it goes on like that and the
10:19
tensions rise now once again be before
10:22
it wasn't really controversial to race
10:25
benen characters so much now part of it
10:27
once again is happening because they
10:29
started doing it to more and more iconic
10:30
characters they start doing more
10:31
frequently and the other problem is they
10:34
grandstand about it so much because once
10:36
again I think before people would just
10:38
assume that if you got a role it was
10:40
because you were the right person for
10:41
that role but now Hollywood has just
10:44
grandstand it so much about look at us
10:47
we we put uh non-white characters in
10:50
this project we're putting more
10:51
diversity more non-white characters look
10:53
at us aren't we good people aren't
10:55
aren't people just going to be so happy
10:57
to be represented it's always BR
10:59
standing from Hollywood posturing about
11:01
how good they are doing this stuff and
11:02
the more they've talked about it the
11:04
more they've called attention to it it's
11:06
made people realize this is not just
11:08
happening because they happen to find
11:10
the right person for the role it's
11:12
happening because they have institutions
11:14
behind the scenes that demand this
11:15
they're doing this because of agendas
11:18
not because they just found the person
11:20
for the role and that once again blows
11:22
it up to be much more than just you
11:24
wanted to see this character look the
11:26
way it was in The Source material it
11:27
starts to become about modern-day
11:30
politics it starts to become about
11:32
agenda pushing it starts to become about
11:34
something so much bigger than that there
11:36
people are now seeing that these things
11:37
are not happening just because they
11:39
found the right person for the role and
11:41
that makes you think you know you could
11:43
have gotten the right person for the
11:44
role maybe or the person who looks the
11:47
way you wanted that character to if they
11:49
didn't have these institutions if they
11:51
weren't posturing about this and once
11:53
again that feeds more tension that is
11:56
all that has happened with this stuff is
11:57
feeding more tension to the point where
12:00
we now see explosions if ever any person
12:03
is playing a race bent character whereas
12:05
before it didn't used to be such a big
12:08
deal now I've been of the opinion for
12:10
years that it doesn't it shouldn't
12:12
matter that much race spending a
12:14
character usually if it doesn't affect
12:16
the story if they found the right person
12:18
for the role like once again Jeffrey
12:20
Wright playing Commissioner Gordon he
12:22
did such a great job at that character
12:25
as that character but some things have
12:28
made me change my mind a little bit
12:30
because of the hypocrisy I see and these
12:33
are some of the things that made me want
12:35
to make this video for example the other
12:37
day I was talking about how I do not
12:39
understand why people want Kiki Palmer
12:41
to play Rogue not because of her race
12:44
but because I just don't see the
12:46
character in her maybe she's been in
12:48
something that I haven't seen where she
12:49
reminds people of the character I just
12:51
don't see it and the point of me saying
12:53
that it's not about her race is me
12:55
saying that if there was an actress that
12:57
just completely embodied the role and
12:58
she happened to be A different race then
13:00
I could understand it but I didn't
13:02
understand this one and someone under
13:04
that Community post wrote that um it it
13:08
should it that race never matters to a
13:11
white character story that it rarely
13:13
ever is relevant to a white character
13:14
story and that that's why it's okay to
13:17
race Bend White characters obviously
13:19
that's what we're talking about here
13:20
because in this day and age they would
13:22
never dare to try to race Bend uh or
13:25
outright race bend a black character and
13:29
that got under my skin a little bit
13:31
because I'm like but it has happened
13:33
when it's relevant to the story Snow
13:35
White that was a big one they had to go
13:38
in and you they already revealed this in
13:40
the international trailer completely
13:42
changed the story to explain a different
13:44
reason why she's called Snow White
13:46
because they had to ca cast a brown
13:48
actress to play her because um for a
13:51
character who's described as Skin as
13:53
white as snow that's how she's defined
13:55
as but Disney in the day and age when
13:57
this was made just would not have a
13:59
white lead as this character so they had
14:02
to change it to honor the day I was born
14:06
my father named me Snow White and this
14:09
is an example a prime example where they
14:12
had to change the story because they
14:14
couldn't cast a white actor for the
14:15
character and it got nothing but
14:17
ridicule once again I don't know what
14:19
they're thinking about this it got
14:20
nothing but ridicule this decision
14:22
another example they did is the
14:24
Fantastic Four uh years ago they cast
14:27
Michael B Jordan to play Johnny dorm and
14:29
that creates problems because uh
14:31
Invisible Woman They cast as a blonde
14:34
white woman like she was in the comics
14:36
but um they're supposed to be biological
14:39
brother and sister but they had to
14:40
change that for Fant for stick because
14:43
they couldn't have four white leads and
14:45
if you think that this isn't happening
14:46
this has been a major conversation stuff
14:49
happening behind the scenes in Hollywood
14:51
that is part of the reason why they had
14:53
such a hard time casting for the new
14:54
Fantastic 4 is they're having a hard
14:56
time with a movie that has four white
14:59
characters as they are in the comics and
15:02
they can't have that they can't have a
15:04
movie with four white leads anymore but
15:06
you see it did change the source
15:08
material this does happen when you're
15:09
changing the source material for me
15:12
personally though it's like you know
15:14
true diversity in real life is sometimes
15:17
imbalanced like in the 90s and and the
15:20
these are shows I grew up with Loving
15:22
Family Matters all black m cast Fresh
15:25
Prince all black main cast I think
15:27
sometimes they brought in a white
15:28
characters like a villain or something I
15:29
didn't care Disney was really patting
15:31
itself on the back of being like we
15:33
hired an all Asian uh cast for Mulan and
15:36
I'm like yeah you should have because
15:38
Mulan is set in China centuries ago you
15:41
know sometimes you're going to have it
15:43
where your cast is disproportionately
15:45
black or Asian or white in fact that's
15:48
just the way it is that's what diversity
15:49
truly looks like we don't all have
15:52
perfectly uh uh quotas filled out in
15:55
real life that's just the way it is and
15:57
if you're not a racist that shouldn't
15:59
bother you that's just the way life is
16:02
so it's like there shouldn't be a
16:03
problem if you just happen to have four
16:06
white leads for Fantastic 4 as is
16:08
accurate to the source material cuz
16:10
there's other stuff like black panther
16:12
that should be a black man cast like
16:14
that's what true diversity looks like
16:16
but you know that comment that person
16:18
made bothered me because it's like no
16:20
one would ever say that blade or cyborg
16:24
should ever be A different race and I
16:26
would agree cuz those are who the
16:27
characters are so it's like for example
16:29
with Rogue yeah I would like I could
16:33
like in the past I could completely
16:34
understand you found the right person
16:35
for the role the the super official
16:37
races the change but you found the right
16:38
person so it's fine but I'm like yeah I
16:41
would like Rogue to hopefully be played
16:43
by a white actress why because she's
16:46
been white in the comics for 40 years
16:49
yeah that that because it's accurate to
16:51
the source material I would like sorg to
16:53
be black because that's accurate to the
16:55
source material in terms of race
16:56
spending there has been controversy
16:58
about colorism about are they hiring
17:01
light brown skinned actors to play Black
17:04
characters uh there's been some
17:06
controversy about that like Sunspot in
17:08
the various adaptations he's had he's
17:10
supposed to be black in the comics and
17:12
it's important to his character and his
17:13
origin for him to be black and fans of
17:15
that character have been upset that he's
17:17
always lighter brown skin and AD ad
17:19
adaptations and I would agree with them
17:22
why because I know what Sunspot is
17:24
supposed to be in the comics people want
17:26
storm to be cast by a darker skin
17:29
black actress and I'm like yes because
17:32
she while storm and the comics was born
17:35
in Harlem she grew up in I think she
17:37
moved to Cairo Egypt she grew up in
17:39
Kenya for a time like that should be the
17:41
characters now from that I think that
17:43
it's okay for someone to also say I
17:45
would like this character to be white
17:48
solely because that's the way that they
17:50
are in the source material and that's
17:52
fine because all this race bending has
17:55
done is it's caused tension it's caused
17:57
hate to the actors that they do it to
18:00
it's caused a lot of division and and
18:02
things blowing up out of proportion to
18:04
become even bigger than just a simple
18:06
casting in a show you know here's the
18:08
real big Crossroads of thinking is for a
18:11
long time I've always been like you know
18:13
if you've just found the right person
18:14
for a role then race bending is okay but
18:17
the problem is that it only ever goes
18:19
Runway like back in the day when they
18:21
cast uh mostly non-puerto Ricans in fact
18:24
only one Puerto Rican to play a Puerto
18:25
Rican character in Westside Story um uh
18:28
one could also say that the actors did a
18:30
good job with their roles but would it
18:32
be was it still right for them to take
18:34
roles away from Puerto Ricans no and so
18:37
that's sort of the crossroads I come to
18:39
with my thinking on this stuff is that
18:41
there is a double standards with it and
18:44
recently the latest controversy over Ray
18:46
spending came over the upcoming
18:47
Spider-Man cartoon where Norman and
18:49
Harry Osborne are black and all I saw
18:52
for this was ridicule not from white
18:55
people so much but black people I just
18:57
saw so many people on YouTube or Twitter
19:00
and these accounts of from black people
19:02
making fun of this because they don't
19:04
actually want it and it was a completely
19:06
an unnecessary change and I watched a
19:08
video that was actually from a black
19:10
person and and he said something that
19:12
really stuck out to me in it and it was
19:15
that um they keep saying this doesn't
19:16
matter it doesn't matter it doesn't
19:18
affect the story so why should it bother
19:19
you and he said if it doesn't matter
19:22
then why do it and it's insulting
19:24
because it makes me feel as a black
19:27
person that you don't see me me as
19:29
legitimate unless I have to have
19:30
something else that came from a white
19:32
person it's annoying and there's going
19:34
to be people saying oh it doesn't matter
19:36
calling demingo is a good actor and he's
19:38
voicing the character you are 100% right
19:41
so if it doesn't matter why do it and
19:45
and that's the whole thing with this
19:46
race bending is so many times it's been
19:49
uh forced and unnecessary and people see
19:52
that and all it's done is drive up
19:53
tension so here is my proposal How about
19:56
if a character is supposed to be black
19:58
then cast a black person if a character
20:00
is supposed to be white cast a white
20:02
person and that way you won't have so
20:04
much tension from groups and and all
20:06
this infighting and arguing and and you
20:09
don't have to focus so much on people's
20:12
race all the time and I think that's
20:14
where we're headed right now you can
20:15
really see how Disney has been affected
20:18
by this and the Tangled live action
20:20
remake and I am completely against a
20:22
tangled liveaction remake but all of the
20:24
the rumored castings for it has then
20:26
Sabrina Carpenter or Florence Pew so a
20:29
white blonde woman to play a white
20:31
blonde woman good fine I think that
20:34
Disney has learned from the Snow White
20:36
movie that it is just ridiculous to
20:37
force it when it doesn't make sense and
20:39
at this point you know it's it is a
20:41
little crazy because as I said race
20:44
bending used to not be a big deal he
20:45
used to get away with it used to be able
20:47
to do it it used to not be a big deal to
20:49
see a non-white person play a
20:51
traditionally white character but they
20:53
made it a problem they made it so that
20:56
now people see it as Force they see it
20:58
as just agenda pushing they don't see it
21:00
as natural to the story they don't
21:02
assume that the person must have gotten
21:03
it because they were right for the role
21:05
they've spoiled it in effect because a
21:08
lot of this stuff that we've been seeing
21:09
this activism in media is just there and
21:12
it just spoils the very thing that
21:13
they're trying to promote so um yeah
21:16
that's my stance on Race bending
21:17
characters I think once again you could
21:19
have gotten away with this uh once upon
21:22
a time I think that there is a big
21:24
minutia in it and it just kind of
21:25
depends on the standards of the day
21:27
about um what is considered morally
21:29
acceptable or not but at this point it
21:31
would just be best to cast people the
21:34
way they were from The Source material
21:35
so you won't have such a fury about it
21:38
but that's all I got for you guys today
21:39
are you mad about me I was nervous about
21:41
talking about this topic but I figure my
21:44
maneuver ears resolution going forward
21:46
is to not be so scared of talking about
21:48
these hot button topics and the more
21:50
that we talk about it and they're just
21:52
normal about it I think the less the
21:54
people out there who will just scream
21:56
racist at you will be able to be
21:58
prominent but that's all I got for you
22:00
guys today what do you think of this
22:01
video yell at me in the comments thank
22:03
you patrons as always for supporting me
22:05
even as I'm covering these topics uh
22:07
once again new short film coming out
22:08
soon and I will see you guys next time

 

Prior Post

 

https://aalbc.com/tc/topic/11424-economiccorner008/

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...