Estimations of Change  02/15/2025

Estimations of Change  02/15/2025
How some wait to get a change back.
https://aalbc.com/tc/profile/6477-richardmurray/?status=2843&type=status

Estimations
The Priest of Kemet after Akhenaten died
Some people in Scotland including Robert Burns after he wrote "Such a Parcel of Rogues in a Nation"
The Daughters of the American Revolution raised on the tales of the glory in the former confederate states 
The Isolationist who opposed Woodrow Wilson
The non black business and communities at the advent of the civil rights act of 1963
*
All have one thing in common, they disliked a change and worked all their lives to undo the change. 
One of the problems in humanity in the Statian imperial phase of the white European global imperial era is the  idea of change being holistically beneficial. No change is ever beneficial to all, no change. In the same way no permanence is ever beneficial to all. 
*
The Tariffs are coming from decades of complaints by a group, mostly non black while not exclusively non black, made up of a collection of groups in the usa: pro deletion of any legal statement to black rights /pro isolation/ pro intracommunal finance between states. The Tariffs from the usa to others + the Diversity Equity Inclusivity D.E.I. deletion or reductions show this clearly. 
Ever since the end of the war between the states,a group of non blacks in the united states of America have worked to delete the presence/notion/idea of black empowerment/rights/equality to non blacks.
Ever since Woodrow Wilson, a group of hyper allegiants in the usa have worked to disconnect the U.S.A. from alliances to any other country. They have opposed the United Nations, the World Bank, North Atlantic Treaty Organization, North American Free Trade Alliance and all other alliances that force the usa to act in tandem to another government. 
*
Most humans at some point in their life go through a change they don't want in their community or the larger environment where they live. It isn't right to live with the change or wrong to fight against the change, or vice versa. Humans are free to choose, but when a change occurs that surprises you, it can be a train derailment unlike any other, buckle up.
*
IN AMENDMENT
some people in the usa waited decades for this day to happen or are witnessing their parents or grandparents dream come true in the current presidency, Isolation has not been supported as strongly in the usa since before woodrow wilson, that is over one hundred years ago... the daughters of the american revolution are cheering in their graves that the community of those willing to oppose betterment for blacks is still going strong. ... The second term of shaking is upon us all, I ponder the future
...
well underestimation of others is balanced by overestimation of oneself. It is unwise to do either. I think many, in the democratic party at the least, didn't or don't realize how many in the usa , for various reasons, don't like the global system the usa centers or the racial changes the democratic party has championed. I remember the election, the current president's supporters cheered loudest when he talked of the things he is doing now. They didn't just cheer they voted.

02162026 

Citation

https://aalbc.com/tc/topic/12472-estimations-of-change /#findComment-80140

osted just now

@ProfD 

  12 hours ago, ProfD said:

Change is inevitable over the course of a lifetime. Humans adapt to changes accordingly.

yes, change is possible from day to day let alone the course of a lifetime. And human beings do react/act in response to changes. But said reactions are not always accordingly while said reactions are never right or wrong. Negative or positive? yes, but not right or wrong and in the context of the usa, this is a huge topic. the usa has the most internally multiracial gathering of humans beings under any government in humanity. Which means by default changes in the usa, as whites in the usa have been learning [ slower than all others but more and more ]since 1492 , tend to be against all groups/communities/gatherings benefit. The examples are plenty in the usa. White individuals who are less aligned to the white populace while more aligned to their individual desires have less problems with the largess of mexicans/chinese/indians in the usa. White individuals who are more aligned to white communal life by default have more problems with the largess of the non white europeans whose lives by default weaken the positive potential of the white community to do for its own. Modern day Harlem is majority non black, black individuals in harlem whose personal life could handle the changes brought on by the non black in harlem have survived or thrived. Black individuals in harlem whose personal life was attached and needed the environment when harlem was majority black have been pushed out or have succumbed to a misery in harlem. Immigrant individuals  post immigration act of 1965 who can survive being the only person like them in some place within the usa have done better. Immigrant individuals post immigration act of 1965 who needed a simulation of their monoracial environment from whence they came are going through ever increasing problems , culminating in immigration and customs enforcement parking themselves in immigrant communities in cities knowing most in the community are adherents to some illegality. NAtive American individuals from the european colonial age have always done better when able to live alone or as a small group among the hordes of second peoples. Native American individuals tied to the first peoples way of life  , as one of my heroes Tecumseh, have lived a life of terror from 1492 to 2026 and counting. 

But no matter how any of the peoples mentioned react to change, no reaction is right or wrong, nor according. By default, change is the most unaccording thing. IT is interesting, you chose the incomplete phrase, humans adapt to changes accordingly. Adapt means to fit. Accord means to be in line. Thus whenever I have heard that phrase " humans adapt to changes accordingly" or read it most recently, it is interesting, philosophically, how incomplete the phrase is. Human reaction to change includes adaptation + lack of adaption. to speak only of human adaptation is to partially ignore the fact that a human does not have to adapt /fit the changes. and changes being according/liking or even or harmonius is only for those that choose to fit/adapt. The heritage of Black descended of enslaved speaking as such comes from black enslaved parents from 1492 who like 99% of thier descendents in the european colonial phase of the usa or the usa itself till 1980, had nothing to give black children, sometimes not even time, so provided lessons, sharp, inflexible, which served survival functions for the black child as an individual. ala to a black child, "you must adapt to changes accordingly" That language is a very old Black DOS heritage, brewed through centuries of being terrorized by whites, unable to collectively do anything, forced to survive as individuals with constant negative changes imposed by others, beyond any black individual to control or deter, no matter said black individuals happiness.

02162026

Citation

https://aalbc.com/tc/topic/12472-estimations-of-change /#findComment-80149

osted just now

@ProfD 

  3 hours ago, ProfD said:

Despite the multiracial make-up of the USA...white folks still run it.

For the record I never said white people didn't control the usa. It makes perfect sense that white people control the usa since they started it. again, most native americans or black descended of enslaved people at the time of the creation of the usa were fighting to stop it from being created and even in the war of 1812, decades after the usa was founded,  most native americans or black descended of enslaved were opposed to the usa and fought for it to be deleted and made part of the english empire again. so... it makes perfect sense today that white people run a government they wanted. 

  3 hours ago, ProfD said:

The poorest white folks still have more privilege & access to safety nets than non-whites. 

Whites who have a problem with immigrants really need to take their issues up with the white folks who use them for cheap labor & maximized profits. Rich getting richer. 

white priviledge makes perfect sense. The greater question is what black fool thinks it shouldn't be that way in the usa today? I can't think of any reason why whites in the usa shouldn't have more power/advantage/positivity in the usa than the non white, regardless of its makeup.

the heritage of fiscally poor whites in the usa of attacking the nonwhite to gain is very strong. the fiscally poor whites don't want to risk breaking white unityby attacking the fiscally wealthy whites, though they don't comprehend the white unity of the past has already been broken

  3 hours ago, ProfD said:

Humans have been adapting to changes accordingly throughout their existence on the planet.

Whether it is relocation, climate, environment, natural disasters, etc., humans have to adapt in order to survive. 

my point is that is a half truth, history proves humans can block changes , or delete changes, it is a lie to only look at those who adapted, those who didn't adapt but stopped change also occurred as equally. That is my point to the Black DOS heritage. Black DOSers in the USA were and are forced to adapt to what changes the non black want, historically, but that is not de facto for all peoples, including black peoples in human history. 

I think it is false to glorify adaption to change. Adapting to change is not evil, but nor is it a good. IT is an option humans have.