Cynthia Erivo: Disgracing The Black Woman

[Pioneer1]

Recently British/Nigerian actress Cynthia Erivo has been featured on the cover of several magazines.

Among them are GQ...a MEN'S magazine where she was featured among the "men of the year".
Another is Harper's Bazaar where she's featured in photos with her muscles and tattoos on prominent display.
 

 

 

 

 

 

For those of you who think this is some innocent or harmless work of art.
Remember that Neely Fuller Jr. has been warning us for DECADES of the plans by the Racists to not just feminize Black men but also MASCULINIZE Black women!

 

 

[ProfD]

Cynthia Erivo is in the entertainment business where it literally pays to be different. 

 

The GQ Man of the Year sh8t was unnecessary but such is case when we lack ownership.

 

Powerless in telling these folks what is an acceptable representation of Black folks.

 

No other group of people would be insulted that way.

 

Unfortunately, Black folks aren't going to do anything about how we're being presented in print and visual media.

[aka Contrarian]

@Pioneer1Who gives a damn what Neely-Full-of-it says? I dont.  Like you, he just sat around blowing a lot of hot air, making moutains out of mole hills, never really relevant to a large segment of America's black population, never having an impact. Relatively few Blacks have even heard of him and his message attributing all black woes to the nebulous "THEY" from whom all evil flows. blah, blah, blah.

A Nigerian lesbian from England poses no threat to the vast majority of black women. And you act as if homosexuality isn't widespread among all ethnicities.

Actually, black individuals think for themselves and lead the kind of lives they choose. The black masses manage to survive. And the beat goes on. That's reality. Something you are far removed from. 

[Troy]

in the first photo, she’s wearing a dress and looking like Trinity from the matrix.

 

In the second photo, she’s wearing stilettos, earrings, long painted fingernails, a necklace, tattoos, are butterflies and another feminine imagery. I don’t see all the muscles pioneers talking about she’s a petite and an excellent physical condition. She looks more like a woman than a man to me.

 

I did not know she was lesbian until AKA mentioned it just now.  Maybe that is why GQ put her in that “man issue” I don’t think that’s a particularly good look, but I don’t care about the magazine. I think positioning Cynthia that way was more of an effort to attract attention. (It worked on Pioneer) than a diabolical plan by the mysterious “They” to masculinize Black women. Even if it was a plan, it’s failing miserably as there are plenty of female, presenting, cis-gender, man loving, black women out there.

 

This is an example of making a mountain out of a molehill a social media, fueled frenzy in increasing white-boy wealth.

[Pioneer1]

ProfD
 

On 12/10/2025 at 10:26 PM, ProfD said:

No other group of people would be insulted that way.

.....and I wonder why?

 

 

Troy
 

On 12/12/2025 at 7:41 AM, Troy said:

This is an example of making a mountain out of a molehill a social media, fueled frenzy in increasing white-boy wealth.

How can you...as heterosexual Black man who is old enough and intelligent enough to SEE the generational shift and what's going on...say this is pretty much nothing?

It's clear and obvious that they are pushing masculinity on our women and encouraging them to be that way or atleast trying to portray Black women as being more masculine.

When was the last time you saw an Arab or Indian woman portrayed like that on the cover of any magazine?

Asian women are among the most numerous women on the planet, so surely they could have found plenty of Asian women to put on the cover of those magazines.
But no...
These White publications dug through the pile until they found EXACTLY who they wanted to portray in that manner -a Black woman.

 

[aka Contrarian]

@Pioneer1Watta crock. The only people masculinizing black women are triflin' black men who have forced them to play the "father" role for the children they make and desert.

 

It makes no sense that black women would be singled out by a magazine, as a group to be masculinized.

The LBGTQ commuity, made up of people from all ethnicities, doesn't need any outside help to increase its ranks.  The trend toward sexual fluidity is evolving on its own as time brings change. 

Go crawl back down your rabbit hole.

[Pioneer1]

aka Contrarian

 

Watta crock. The only people masculinizing black women are triflin' black men who have forced them to play the "father" role for the children they make and desert.

 

Was Cynthia knocked up by a triflin' Black man and abandoned?
Was SHE forced to play "father" for a bunch of little kids?

There are women in middle east and Afghanistan who grew up seeing all of the men of their village slaughtered.
There are MILLIONS of women in the Middle East, Asia, and Africa who have had to raise children without a man in the home but they still retain their femininity.
You don't see them walking around showing off their muscles.
You don't see them getting tattoos all over their bodies.
You don't see their voices getting deeper or them acting more aggressive or violent.

 

Something is being done to the women HERE that is making them clearly more masculine than the women of other countries or cultures.

Maybe the question is what is it about SOME women in America that is so unattractive and repulsive that would make a man want to leave them AND even any children they had with them, rather than do the instinctive thing and stay around.
 

[aka Contrarian]

You are obsessed with the preposterous idea of black women being turned into masculine beings.  Something very unlikely to happen!

 

All I is gotta say is why don't you relocate to the middle east where women are second class citizens, totally subordinate to their menfolk. That is what you truly envision as an ideal situation. Your exit would be good riddance.

[Pioneer1]

6 minutes ago, aka Contrarian said:

All I is gotta say is why don't you relocate to the middle east where women are second class citizens, totally subordinate to their menfolk. That is what you truly envision as an ideal situation. 

I don't want a society where women are second class citizens or not even considered citizens at all and are subordinate to men.

I actually want a society where men and women are equal in rights, however the women are so feminine that they NATURALLY are less aggressive and less assertive than men so there is no need or desire for most men to try to "force" this on them.

If you have to FORCE this on somebody, that means it's often unnatural for them to do.

 

[aka Contrarian]

In others words, you're fine with women as long as they "stay in their place".

One thing is sure; a capable man is not threatened by a woman.

[Pioneer1]

3 minutes ago, aka Contrarian said:

In others words, you're fine with women as long as they "stay in their place".

One thing is sure; a capable man is not threatened by a woman.

You're correct to say " in other words".....because those words are OTHER than my own...lol.
I didn't say this.
I made my position crystal clear.

[aka Contrarian]

28 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

...I made my position crystal clear.

 

And I made my position clear: "A capable man is not threatened by a woman."

You're standing on shaky grounds.

[Pioneer1]

10 minutes ago, aka Contrarian said:

 

You're standing on shaky grounds.

 

 

The ground only shakes when YOU come dancing through....lol.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

"If she makes the ground shake like that dancing BARE FOOT!
.....I'm bettin' a pair of high heels would probably break the RICHTER SCALE!"

....lol.

[aka Contrarian]

@Pioneer1You are incapable  of self examination. Objectivity is a foreign concept to you. You are the victim of your ego. Also a loser.

[Pioneer1]

3 hours ago, aka Contrarian said:

@Pioneer1You are incapable  of self examination. 

I bet you're an EXPERT at "self examination"....lol.

Especially since you drove the last man away who used to take you shopping a few years ago.

[ProfD]

13 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

Something is being done to the women HERE that is making them clearly more masculine than the women of other countries or cultures.

The USA allows freedom of choice and expression that does not exist in other countries.

[Pioneer1]

5 hours ago, ProfD said:

The USA allows freedom of choice and expression that does not exist in other countries.

Is it really freedom when you are being poisoned chemically as well as indoctrinated to think and behave a certain way?

 

Let's use the recent case of Sherrone Moore for example....

Was he free to have sex with whoever he wanted to?
Or was he PUNISHED when it was discovered who he was having sex with?

 

[ProfD]

31 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

Is it really freedom when you are being poisoned chemically as well as indoctrinated to think and behave a certain way?

Supposedly, we have freewill when it comes to what we think, eat, drink and do.

31 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

Was he free to have sex with whoever he wanted to?

Or was he PUNISHED when it was discovered who he was having sex with?

Sherrone Moore broke the rules of his contract in having a relationship with a staffer.

 

Moore was free to get down with anybody else. No different from military rules regarding fraternization.

[Pioneer1]

36 minutes ago, ProfD said:

 

Sherrone Moore broke the rules of his contract in having a relationship with a staffer.

Moore was free to get down with anybody else. No different from military rules regarding fraternization.

 

Then he wasn't free.

His behavior was restricted/limited.

[ProfD]

12 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

Then he wasn't free.

His behavior was restricted/limited.

Every *job* comes with rules, regulations and restrictions.

 

Employees have to follow the rules. Show up late to work and there's probably a penalty.

 

Moore was always free to quit his job if that particular snow bunny snatch box was worth more than millions of dollars.

 

Moore could have used his money to buy it from snow bunnies outside his job.

[Pioneer1]

 ProfD

While you're correct in your assessment of his choices AND I have to keep saying that he indeed made some bad and foolish choices, my point is:  He wasn't free.
We DON'T live in a free society.
So he wasn't allowed to exercise or express his sexuality, even with those who voluntarily wanted to with him.

 

[ProfD]

22 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

 ...my point is:  He wasn't free.
We DON'T live in a free society.

We live in a land of laws and rules that we agree to follow. If that means nobody is free...I won't debate it.

[Pioneer1]

34 minutes ago, ProfD said:

We live in a land of laws and rules that we agree to follow. If that means nobody is free...I won't debate it.

That's my point.
So as we go back to the behavior of some of our women in America and why so many of them are masculine acting compared with Black women from other parts of the planet, there must be some OTHER sort of explanation other than because they are "free" to act that way.

 

Certainly Cynthia Erivo...who is British and of Nigerian descent is behaving in a masculine manner IN the West.
But Nigerian women don't act like that in Nigeria.

[ProfD]

47 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

That's my point.
So as we go back to the behavior of some of our women in America and why so many of them are masculine acting compared with Black women from other parts of the planet, there must be some OTHER sort of explanation other than because they are "free" to act that way.

 

...behaving in a masculine manner IN the West.

Unless there is something in the water and/or soil in the West which doesn't seem to affect everyone, I still contend that freewill here in the US allows people to act or be whatever they choose.

 

The issue I have with both masculinized and effeminized images of women and men respectively is that appears to but a bullseye on Black folks.

 

I do not see a proportionate representation of other groups of people when it comes down to those images.

 

Surely, there must be masculinized and effeminized members of other groups of people especially if they're residing in the West.

[Pioneer1]

ProfD

 

Unless there is something in the water and/or soil in the West which doesn't seem to affect everyone, I still contend that freewill here in the US allows people to act or be whatever they choose.

 

There is, many chemicals.

 

Atrazine is but one of them.
It's scientifically proven to feminize men and reduce the testosterone rates.

 

Soy is also scientifically proven to lower the testosterone rates in males and soy has been an ingredient in MOST foods for a long time.

 

 

 

The issue I have with both masculinized and effeminized images of women and men respectively is that appears to but a bullseye on Black folks.

 

I do not see a proportionate representation of other groups of people when it comes down to those images.

Neely Fuller Jr. told you that, and he told you why...lol.

 

 

 

Surely, there must be masculinized and effeminized members of other groups of people especially if they're residing in the West.

 

Their absolutely are.
Infact, I'd say the rates are naturally HIGHER in other groups than among Black folks....naturally.
However the racists are PROMOTING it more among Black people to cause greater confusion.

 

In other words....
Whether it's occurring at a higher rate among us or not, they'll specifically LOOK FOR those of our people who are sexually confused and promote them anyway to make it seem as if it's predominant among us.