Origin Of The Theory Of Evolution

[Pioneer1]

This is the origin of the Theory Of Evolution

Charlese Darwin.....a notorious racist.....is widely considered one of the founding fathers of this Theory that White archeologists and other scientists promote in their institutions and that so many silly Black folks support for it's "out of Africa" claims.

Notice the term "the preservation of FAVOURED races" in the subtitle?

In a nutshell, the Theory of Evolution states that apes OR an ape like species evolved into Africans....and then the Africans evolved into other races.

In other word, Africans are LESS EVOLVED and CLOSER TO APES!

That's the theory!

Do any of you support that?

If you support the THEORY of Evolution, then you do.

[aka Contrarian]

What is the alternate theory to the origin of species that "sensible" black laymen dispute, and prove Darwin to be wrong about?

[Pioneer1]

It's hard to "prove" ancient history.

Proof involves presenting evidence to support an assertion that convinces a target audience beyond reasonable doubt.
This usually involves evidence that you can either experience or witness for yourself.

Unless you have a time machine to actually take somebody back in time to experience or witness an event, it's hard to "prove" it beyond dispute.

However the most popular alternatives to the Theory of Evolution is Creationism and Interplanetary Seeding.

 

[aka Contrarian]

In other words, alternate theories; ones whose  merits  are more aligned  with your beliefs.

Sounds like a typical case of the  kind of approach, ADOs reject when it comes to Afro Americans doing their version of revisionist history.

 

 

[Pioneer1]

 

8 minutes ago, aka Contrarian said:

In other words, alternate theories; ones whose  merits  are more aligned  with your beliefs.

 

And if we ARE dealing with theories....and not established facts.....then why not?

Especially if one theory has just as much evidence to support it as the others.
 

[aka Contrarian]

Why waste time on theories at all when the only proof is what exists today, - manifestations wherein  each group thinks it's better than the other, a mindset that is the one thing they all have in common. Something which will eventually prove to be their downfall.

 

 

[Pioneer1]

10 minutes ago, aka Contrarian said:

Why waste time on theories at all when the only proof is what exists today

NOW you're starting to learn 

It might have took you 90 years or so, but you're getting there.
Keep it up.

[aka Contrarian]

@Pioneer1Oh puleeze. Spare me your cherry pickin. Like you're an old sage of wisdom instead of a die hard black fanatic  and wanna-be visionary  who never misses a chance to  promote black superiority even as he drones on and on about what "black folks need to do"  - to be worthy of his approval.

[Pioneer1]

27 minutes ago, aka Contrarian said:

 even as he drones on and on about what "black folks need to do"  - to be worthy of his approval.

I won't bother telling YOU what you need to do to be worthy of my approval.
....because I know it's a standard you're not capable of achieving anyway, lol.
 

[aka Contrarian]

@Pioneer1Your approval is the least of my concerns. That should've been obvious when I declined your olive branch which was nothing more than a sprig of poison ivy, befitting your rancid toxicity.

[Pioneer1]

14 hours ago, aka Contrarian said:

@Pioneer1Your approval is the least of my concerns. That should've been obvious when I declined your olive branch which was nothing more than a sprig of poison ivy, befitting your rancid toxicity.

You declined because you like drama and the attention.

[aka Contrarian]

@Pioneer1yeah, yeah, yeah,  ignoring your overtures is an example of my liking attention and drama, huh? Putting your ego-centric, self-serving spin on things, in denial as usual, thinking you have it all figured out.

I declined because I had no desire to accommodate your attempt to control the narrative by playing "Mr. NIce Guy", something  you really aren't, and I'm fine with not being friends with you.

'Nuff said, move on. 

 

 

[Pioneer1]

36 minutes ago, aka Contrarian said:

@Pioneer1yeah, yeah, yeah,  ignoring your overtures is an example of my liking attention and drama, huh? Putting your ego-centric, self-serving spin on things, in denial as usual, thinking you have it all figured out.

I declined because I had no desire to accommodate your attempt to control the narrative by playing "Mr. NIce Guy", something  you really aren't, and I'm fine with not being friends with you.

'Nuff said, move on. 

 

 

Who said anything about being "friends"???
I simply gave you an offer to end the friction and unnecessary hostility.

Instead, you took that olive branch and WEAPONIZED it.

But I'll move on, 'cuz it looks like you're busy trying to pick a fight with somebody else right now.....lol.
 

[aka Contrarian]

@Pioneer1Yeah, take that contaminated olive branch and stuff it, and save me the trouble of further weaponizing it against your phony civility. 

 

And, wooo, who said anything about "picking a fight"?? I was simply asking Tesa a reasonable question but you weaponized this with your distortion powers.

 

 

[frankster]

On 2/20/2026 at 6:49 AM, Pioneer1 said:

This is the origin of the Theory Of EvolutionI do not 

Yes...Modern Evolutionary Theory and especially the use of the word evolution..

The Ancients would use the term "After its Kind"

 

 

On 2/20/2026 at 6:49 AM, Pioneer1 said:

Charlese Darwin.....a notorious racist.....is widely considered one of the founding fathers of this Theory that White archeologists and other scientists promote in their institutions and that so many silly Black folks support for it's "out of Africa" claims.

Yes Darwin is so considered....

All evidence so far support "out of Africa".

It is proper to distrust information coming from both racist Individuals and their racist Institutions.

It is also easy to recognize their blind spot....and differentiate it from Facts Evidence and Accurate Interpretation

 

On 2/20/2026 at 6:49 AM, Pioneer1 said:

Notice the term "the preservation of FAVOURED races" in the subtitle?

Possible blind spot..

 

On 2/20/2026 at 6:49 AM, Pioneer1 said:

In a nutshell, the Theory of Evolution states that apes OR an ape like species evolved into Africans....and then the Africans evolved into other races.

You may infer and or accept that if you choose to...

We do not descend from apes is clear....so that comparison is false.

It can also be said....Whether true or not - That Europeans phenotypically have more traits in common with Apes and Neanderthal

 

On 2/20/2026 at 6:49 AM, Pioneer1 said:

In other word, Africans are LESS EVOLVED and CLOSER TO APES!

Pure propaganda

It is now being Acknowledge in many establish scientific schools of thought and study that Europeans have more Neanderthal Genes than Africans

If that be true then one can infer.....they must be closer in relationship to neanderthal than African

One can then further infer since Homo sapiens are the most evolved hominids.....and Africans are the purest Homo sapiens - then they must be the furthest from Apes

 

On 2/20/2026 at 6:49 AM, Pioneer1 said:

That's the theory!

And your understanding and interpretation of it...

And possible the reason why you reject it

 

On 2/20/2026 at 6:49 AM, Pioneer1 said:

Do any of you support that?

Not the racially motivated blind spots

 

On 2/20/2026 at 6:49 AM, Pioneer1 said:

If you support the THEORY of Evolution, then you do.

 

There you go trying to "pigeon holing" individuals to your limited understanding.

 

 

[Pioneer1]

frankster

 

 

Yes...Modern Evolutionary Theory and especially the use of the word evolution..
The Ancients would use the term "After its Kind"

 

"After it's kind" implies things remain the same as they were after they first came into existence (in this Reality atleast).
No change.

 

Evolution....on the other hand...by definition implies continual change.

 

 

 

 

We do not descend from apes is clear....so that comparison is false.

 

I don't believe that we do, but that's what the Theory of Evolution implies.

 

 

 

 

It can also be said....Whether true or not - That Europeans phenotypically have more traits in common with Apes and Neanderthal

 

Elijah Muhammad taught that apes came from them.
Not that they came from apes...but that apes came from them; trying to change themselves back into the Original Man.

 

 

 

 

 

One can then further infer since Homo sapiens are the most evolved hominids.....and Africans are the purest Homo sapiens - then they must be the furthest from Apes

 

I don't know about the "purest homo sapiens", however if the Theory of Evolution teaches that other races or especially the White race evolved from Africans.....that clearly implies that Africans are less evolved.

 

 

There you go trying to "pigeon holing" individuals to your limited understanding.

 

My admitted limited understanding is based on linear thinking (deductive reasoning) and common sense.

 

If your theory teaches that Africans were the first humans AND that other races/ethnicities outside of Africa evolved FROM Africans....that clearly implies that African humans are not AS EVOLVED as those other races/ethnicities of humans.

 

How else should that theory be interpreted?

 

 

 

 

 

 

-Men are mature males.

 

 

-Ok....
So boys are immature males?

 

 

-NO NO NO...nobody said that.
That's in insult to boys.
To call them immature!

 

 

-Ok...
Well do men come FROM boys?

 

 

-Yes
Boys actually BECOME men after they have matured.

 

 

 

 

[frankster]

18 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

frankster

 

 

Yes...Modern Evolutionary Theory and especially the use of the word evolution..
The Ancients would use the term "After its Kind"

 

"After it's kind" implies things remain the same as they were after they first came into existence (in this Reality atleast).
No change.

 

Evolution....on the other hand...by definition implies continual change.

After its kind....it never said after it self - kind as in "kinda"

Changed in the sense of adaptation

 

18 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

We do not descend from apes is clear....so that comparison is false.

 

I don't believe that we do, but that's what the Theory of Evolution implies.

cool....to you it does - imply.

To me it does not....

 

 

18 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

It can also be said....Whether true or not - That Europeans phenotypically have more traits in common with Apes and Neanderthal

 

Elijah Muhammad taught that apes came from them.
Not that they came from apes...but that apes came from them; trying to change themselves back into the Original Man.

True....he is entitled to his opinions and beliefs.

Does it means that Elijah Muhammad supports The Theory of Evolution?

 

 

18 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

One can then further infer since Homo sapiens are the most evolved hominids.....and Africans are the purest Homo sapiens - then they must be the furthest from Apes

 

I don't know about the "purest homo sapiens",

So says science of genetics...

 

18 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

however if the Theory of Evolution teaches that other races or especially the White race evolved from Africans.....that clearly implies that Africans are less evolved.

I do not know that white humans evolves from black humans....What I do know is that white skin is a recessive trait in humans - mutation/variation.

 

18 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

 

There you go trying to "pigeon holing" individuals to your limited understanding.

 

My admitted limited understanding is based on linear thinking (deductive reasoning) and common sense.

Linear Thinking is too dependent on one perspective....deductive reasoning takes into account many perspectives

Common sense is usually a collection of prejudices appealed to  so as not to have to think

 

18 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

If your theory teaches that Africans were the first humans AND that other races/ethnicities outside of Africa evolved FROM Africans....that clearly implies that African humans are not AS EVOLVED as those other races/ethnicities of humans.

That contradicts your earlier assertion of the teachings of Elijah Muhammad that apes evolve from white men....apes  appear less evolve than white men to me - is that/this  not the case for you?

 

18 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

How else should that theory be interpreted?

Clearly not the way you  are trying to explain it  as you have already contradicted your own explanation...

One would have to discern Who is fittest and most adapted to their environment.....which is planet Earth.

 

18 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

-Men are mature males.

Yes

 

18 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

-Ok....
So boys are immature males?

Yes

 

18 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

-NO NO NO...nobody said that.
That's in insult to boys.
To call them immature!

cool

 

18 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

-Ok...

Well do men come FROM boys?

No...Men do not come from boys(as in reproduction).

Boys become Men

to come from and become are two different things

To "come from" is a usually Place of Origin or Direction

To "become" is usually a State of Being

 

18 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

-Yes
Boys actually BECOME men after they have matured.

 

Speaking physically...

Boys change into Men

Men do not change to boys

Boys become Men Culturally/Socially and Biologically....At which time they can sire or reproduce boys or girls with a fertile women/female

Boys come from pregnant women as a baby.