Saturday at 12:31 PM4 days comment_83205 Common admits he had no love for George W Bush until he saw how Michelle Obama treated himCommon says Michelle Obama’s respectful treatment of George W. Bush changed the way he viewed the former U.S. leader.The Chicago artist said watching Michelle Obama interact respectfully with George W. Bush changed how he viewed the former U.S. leader. During the August 5 episode of “Scene Stealers”,Common admits he had no love for George W Bush until he saw how Michelle Obama treated himHe should have been offended, instead of letting that mess influence him.But this is nothing new.I've seen Michelle Obama flirt with that racist clown on a NUMBER of occasions..........I don't see her hugging and smooching on prominent Black men like that, so what's so special about Bush?I wish some of these Black women would stop cuddling these decrepit old racists and using "love of humanity" as an excuse just to hug and kiss on a White man.Some of our people see White people as angels and use every opportunity they can to get closer to them and feel and touch on them.Like that fool down in Texas who wanted to hug on the White cop who just killed his brother. Report
Saturday at 01:42 PM4 days comment_83214 There's no shortage of Black men & women showing affection towards white folks. Realistically, it is going to happen in a country with 345 million people that they're going to mix it up.Brother Malcolm X kicked it with white women before he was imprisoned & discovered Islam. As a former FLOTUS, Michelle Obama is a part of an exclusive club. I believe she & POTUS Obama got to see another side of former POTUS Bush.Otherwise, Black folks don't need an excuse to be affectionate towards non-Blacks. They're just doing it. 🤣😎 Report
Saturday at 01:52 PM4 days Author comment_83216 It's not interracial dating or interracial sex that I have a problem with.I don't have a problem with Black men screwing women of other races and although I DO a problem with Black women being screwed by men of other races, I accept it as part of living in America....it is what it is.It's the PROMOTION of Black women hugging and loving on White men, especially racist ones like George W....that I have a problem with.It's almost as if there is some sort of PR campaign to endear us to them and make racist, murderous, hateful people seem cute and cuddly and not as harmful and evil as they are.Has she forgotten Katrina and how that man she loves to hold hands with and hug on treated thousands of Black citizens? Report
Sunday at 05:11 AM3 days comment_83232 15 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:It's the PROMOTION of Black women hugging and loving on White men, especially racist ones like George W....that I have a problem with.Rest assured, POTUS OJ won't be taking any pictures with a Black woman hugged up on him.Closest thing to a Black woman hugging POTUS OJ will be Sen. Tim Scott.🤣😎 Report
Sunday at 11:41 AM3 days Author comment_83236 6 hours ago, ProfD said:Closest thing to a Black woman hugging POTUS OJ will be Sen. Tim Scott.🤣😎....and he's not a woman, but he's not a real man either....lol.What happened to those 2 fat sistaz who used to come on and sing Trump's praises when he was first running from President?I think they're names were Diamond and Silk? Report
Sunday at 12:50 PM3 days comment_83237 1 hour ago, Pioneer1 said:What happened to those 2 fat sistaz who used to come on and sing Trump's praises when he was first running from President?I think they're names were Diamond and Silk?Diamond passed away in 2023. Her sister Silk still uses the duo name.😎 Report
Sunday at 08:26 PM3 days comment_83242 I did her about this "story." I wonder what the reaction would be if Laura Bush and Barack were being constantly seen kissing each other on the lips, embracing, and holding hands... I'm sure that will not happen as Barack know he has to be more careful Honestly, I could care less either way. Does anyone else? I gather from the 60 minutes clip the image for Michelle hugging George went viral; was the reaction largely positive or negative? Report
Sunday at 11:18 PM3 days Author comment_83244 Troy2 hours ago, Troy said:I wonder what the reaction would be if Laura Bush and Barack were being constantly seen kissing each other on the lips, embracing, and holding hands... I'm sure that will not happen as Barack know he has to be more carefulFacts.And Laura wouldn't disrespect HER husband like that by embracing and smooching on another man in public.Michelle does it because she has less respect for Barack than a wife should have for her husband, much less one who actually made it to the Presidency and so that her ass could crawl up into one of the beds of the Whitehouse when she sleeps at night.Coming all the way up there from the Southside of Chicago, she should be the LAST First Lady to disrespect her husband like that.2 hours ago, Troy said:Does anyone else?They should, even if they don't.If not this...what DO Black men care about?Getting high??Cars???This is one of the reasons so many men around the world don't respect Black men.Because we can watch one of our own women get comfortable and cozy with a racist man who had openly displayed his racism and harmed so many....and not bat an eye.Even think it's cute.Infact, many Black men think it's a sign of honor and respect NOT to care who their women are having sex with and will even try to clown YOU as being insecure or jealous or irrational for paying attention and worrying about who Black women like and have sex with!Except when it comes to White men....no other race of men would tolerate such dishonor, disrespect, and disloyalty.I'm not saying Black men should go crazy over it.I'm saying that the fact that so many don't even care is a PATHOLOGY that needs to be corrected before expecting any sort of progresses in our community.Most men of other races stick together and demand loyalty and respect from their women and don't like them having sex with men outside of their group.There is no disagreement among them over that particular subject.Even if they don't do anything about it...as in the case when White men sleep with their women....they certainly agree not to like it.Black men argue and fight with eachother over whether or not we should even care who Black women sleep with.We were probably doing this in Africa, which allowed Arabs and Europeans to come and take advantage of the situation and steal as many women as they could. Report
20 hours ago20 hr comment_83289 On 8/30/2026 at 7:18 PM, Pioneer1 said:Most men of other races stick together and demand loyalty and respect from their women and don't like them having sex with men outside of their group.There is no disagreement among them over that particular subject.Even if they don't do anything about it...as in the case when White men sleep with their women....they certainly agree not to like it.First question is how they can consider themselves men if they're unable to protect their women &/or keep them from sleeping with white men.😎 Report
15 hours ago15 hr Author comment_83292 4 hours ago, ProfD said:First question is how they can consider themselves men if they're unable to protect their women &/or keep them from sleeping with white men.😎The inability to do this doesn't take away from their manhood, in my opinion.The Black men who were enslaved for the most part weren't able to protect their women or keep them from being violated and abused by the slave masters.But they were still men.It's less about masculinity and manhood and more a matter of technological advancement as well as defense strategy. Report
7 hours ago7 hr comment_83294 8 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:The inability to do this doesn't take away from their manhood, in my opinion.Go to any prison...a man's inability to fight & protect himself & his interests could cause him to lose his manhood.8 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:The Black men who were enslaved for the most part weren't able to protect their women or keep them from being violated and abused by the slave masters.But they were still men.Biologically they were still considered men. In the grand scheme of being protectors & providers, they were reduced to over-sized boys. Many male slaves were either buck-broken (raped) or castrated & became eunuchs. Either way, they were stripped of their manhood too.8 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:It's less about masculinity and manhood and more a matter of technological advancement as well as defense strategy.Having the ability & willingness to inflict violence & maximum damage by any means necessary on any eenemy is all about masculinity & manhood.Any man who is unwilling to kill or be killed protecting himself & his own is not considered a real man in the grand scheme of things. The only reason Black men are disrespected by other men is because they have not instilled fear in other men in order to earn their respect.😎 Report
3 hours ago3 hr Author comment_83301 ProfDGo to any prison...a man's inability to fight & protect himself & his interests could cause him to lose his manhood.It depends on how one is defining "manhood".From a physical point of view, the only way not being able to protect himself could cost him his manhood is if his testicle were damaged in some sort of altercation causing his secondary male characteristics and personality to change and become more feminine.From a socio-psychological view, losing one's manhood in prison means being forced to act like a woman and identify as a woman after being turned into somebody's bitch.Simply not being able to fight or even being raped doesn't automatically lead to EITHER of these.It COULD lead to it...but not necessarily.Biologically they were still considered men. In the grand scheme of being protectors & providers, they were reduced to over-sized boys.Society wouldn't consider them ideal men, but that doesn't take them out the realm of manhood....in my opinion.Many male slaves were either buck-broken (raped) or castrated & became eunuchs. Either way, they were stripped of their manhood too.Being raped doesn't necessarily strip a man of his manhood.It's traumatizing and depressing...yes.However it still doesn't necessarily strip him of acting like a man.Castration on the other hand...often does.Having the ability & willingness to inflict violence & maximum damage by any means necessary on any eenemy is all about masculinity & manhood.I don't think that defines your manhood so much as it defines your STATUS as a man!Even a wimpy or cowardly man is usually still considered a man.Just on the lower rung of the ladder...lol.Any man who is unwilling to kill or be killed protecting himself & his own is not considered a real man in the grand scheme of things.That's more of a social/cultural thing than a biological fact.There are millions of men in America who are unwilling to kill or be killed to protect their families yet they are still honored as men in this society.I'd go as far as to say MOST American men aren't willing to actually kill or be killed to protect his family.He'd hide them in the closet and call the police first.The only reason Black men are disrespected by other men is because they have not instilled fear in other men in order to earn their respect.That's not the ONLY reason.....lol.I believe it's a MAJOR reason.....but not the only one.Asians men are considered among the least violent most docile men in this society, yet they generally get more respect than Black men.Lack of FINANCIAL INDEPENDENCE is also a huge reason Black men don't get as much respect.How can a man respect you if you're constantly looking to him and begging him for a job? Report
1 hour ago1 hr comment_83303 1 hour ago, Pioneer1 said:It depends on how one is defining "manhood".From a physical point of view, the only way not being able to protect himself could cost him his manhood is if his testicle were damaged in some sort of altercation causing his secondary male characteristics and personality to change and become more feminine.From a socio-psychological view, losing one's manhood in prison means being forced to act like a woman and identify as a woman after being turned into somebody's bitch.Simply not being able to fight or even being raped doesn't automatically lead to EITHER of these.It COULD lead to it...but not necessarily.You crack me up when it comes to literal & semantic & will skate across the thinnest ice to make a point &/or be right.🤣1 hour ago, Pioneer1 said:Biologically they were still considered men. In the grand scheme of being protectors & providers, they were reduced to over-sized boys.Society wouldn't consider them ideal men, but that doesn't take them out the realm of manhood....in my opinion.Women won't consider them ideal men either. They just go along with it because he's Black.1 hour ago, Pioneer1 said:Many male slaves were either buck-broken (raped) or castrated & became eunuchs. Either way, they were stripped of their manhood too.Being raped doesn't necessarily strip a man of his manhood.It's traumatizing and depressing...yes.However it still doesn't necessarily strip him of acting like a man.Castration on the other hand...often does.Grandmaster Flash said, "now your manhood is taken & you're a may-tag, spend the next 2 years as an undercover fag..."🤣1 hour ago, Pioneer1 said:Having the ability & willingness to inflict violence & maximum damage by any means necessary on any eenemy is all about masculinity & manhood.I don't think that defines your manhood so much as it defines your STATUS as a man!Even a wimpy or cowardly man is usually still considered a man.Just on the lower rung of the ladder...lol.Any man who is unwilling to kill or be killed protecting himself & his own is not considered a real man in the grand scheme of things.That's more of a social/cultural thing than a biological fact.Sure. Biology determines male or female. How one acts & functions in society is a reflection of their manhood or womanhood.1 hour ago, Pioneer1 said:There are millions of men in America who are unwilling to kill or be killed to protect their families yet they are still honored as men in this society.Absolutely. Nobody is going to call upon those dudes to man up either. Whenever those males have problems with women....they should check their manhood.😁1 hour ago, Pioneer1 said:Asians men are considered among the least violent most docile men in this society, yet they generally get more respect than Black men.The respect they get is cultural but there is still an honor code among them too. If/when it is time get active i.e. be violent, they will do it.1 hour ago, Pioneer1 said:Lack of FINANCIAL INDEPENDENCE is also a huge reason Black men don't get as much respect.How can a man respect you if you're constantly looking to him and begging him for a job?Right. It is hard to be respected as a man if one cannot provide (financial indepedence) & protect (capable of violence).A huge amount of wealth was accumulated through enslavement &/or some form of violence & passed down as an inheritance.If Black men in Africa kicked out non-Black people tomorrow, in less than 2 years, it would be one of the wealthiest continents on the planet by way of natural resources.😎 Report
57 minutes ago57 min Author comment_83305 ProfDYou crack me up when it comes to literal & semantic & will skate across the thinnest ice to make a point &/or be rightBut like Professor Griff used to ask Brother Rich (Red Pill)...am I right or wrong???Women won't consider them ideal men either. They just go along with it because he's Black.Get ready for more semantics and literalism....lol.It depends on the woman and what SHE'S looking for in a man.I actually have this discussion with African women quite a bit!When it comes to women from more traditional societies and cultures, the ideal man IS a provider and protector.However most women in the West aren't looking for a man to provide for or protect them.It would be nice.It would be something they dream of.But they aren't necessarily expecting it anymore because THEY have been trained to get out and work for and protect themselves.So in THIS society, the ideal man may be one who is good at sex and giving her orgasms when she want them.Sure. Biology determines male or female. How one acts & functions in society is a reflection of their manhood or womanhood.Facts.The respect they get is cultural but there is still an honor code among them too. If/when it is time get active i.e. be violent, they will do it.Like during the L.A. Riots when a lot of the Asian men armed themselves to protect their stores.If Black men in Africa kicked out non-Black people tomorrow, in less than 2 years, it would be one of the wealthiest continents on the planet by way of natural resources.If all of the non-Black people were kicked out of Africa....much of it would be looking like Somalia or Rwanda (not Rwanda today but Rwanda back in 1994) in less than a year.Niggaz riding around on the back of mopeds with AKs wrapped up in duct tape, and rags of various sorts tied around their heads killing eachother over what little White folks left behind....until they run out of bullets.....because THEY ain't making them.Then they'll start chasing eachother around buildings and across streets with machetes.Kicking the Arabs and Indians out wouldn't make much difference.Infact, it would probably help and lessen the religious and cultural confusion.But because of colonialism, White folks are so ingrained in Africans economic and social infrastructure that removing them would be like removing the steel beams from a building.Ofcourse after a few decades of NO White interference....nature would take it's course and Black folks would eventually develop a government suitable for our needs and desires.But before then...chaos.Chasing eachother across highways with machetes and scraping the ground with them making sparks fly to intimidate eachother.Plenty of farms, with fruits and vegetables rotting on the vines...because nobody is picking them or harvesting them.They're all busy fighting eachother over what valuables got left behind.Fuck the farm. Report
Create an account or sign in to comment