Anthropic’s moral conflict is playing out in real time

Dario Amodei built Anthropic to avoid this very kind of moment.

In a stunning essay Saturday, the chief executive of one of the leading AI companies echoed many of the doomsday warnings—from current and recent employees—that sparked panic across the nation this past week.

Anthropic’s moral conflict is playing out in real time

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

🙄

I'm not too interested in the subject of this article itself but posted it to illustrate the difference in concerns so many people in this society seem to have to deal with.
The gap seems to be as wide as the Pacific.

First of all, what "moral conflict" are we talking about here???

When I hear rich atheistic people talk about "moral conflicts" and "doomsday" it tickles me because they're hypocritically using terms for ideas they pretty much reject anyway.
And it's usually over something the average person wouldn't even consider worth discussing.

There's nothing moral or immoral about using AI.
It's just another tool they've invented to increase production, cut the labor force, and explore innovation.
It could be good or bad depending on your perspective.
But the claim to....whatever they're talking about....leading to "panic" all over the nation is what got my attention.

Many people are dealing with homelessness, power outages, diseases, chronic illnesses, low wages, gang violence, and other REAL PROBLEMS around this nation....so who the fuck is "panicking" over this?
.....besides a bunch of rich bastards who's lives are going so great that they have nothing else to worry about EXCEPT this?

Dialysis clinics are popping up all over the nation because of so much diabetes and kidney failure among people....but THIS is causing people to "panic" across the nation?????

It just shows you how people are living in different Realities as illustrated by their starkly different concerns.

The alarm bells went ot off when the essayist wrote that AI could kill off the human population before the decade ends.

Surely, whatever problems humans have in society right now would disappear immediately upon their demise.

Using this AI warning as a scare tactic or as motivation, if people knew they only had 5 or less years left to live, I wonder how differently they would approach life. 😎

Are We Living In Separate Realities?

Yes....We all live in our own Subjective Reality and a Shared(agreed upon)Reality... then there is Objective Reality(things as they are)

4 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

Anthropic’s moral conflict is playing out in real time

Dario Amodei built Anthropic to avoid this very kind of moment.

In a stunning essay Saturday, the chief executive of one of the leading AI companies echoed many of the doomsday warnings—from current and recent employees—that sparked panic across the nation this past week.

Anthropic’s moral conflict is playing out in real time

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Much ado about a foregone conclusion...

4 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

🙄

I'm not too interested in the subject of this article itself but posted it to illustrate the difference in concerns so many people in this society seem to have to deal with.
The gap seems to be as wide as the Pacific.

First of all, what "moral conflict" are we talking about here???

My understanding....I Am open to correction

The Moral conflict that Dario Amodie has been talking about historically is using AI for Life and/or Death autonomous use (without human intervention or decision making input) and Mass Domestic surveillance...by the Security State and the Military Industrial Complex

The article seems to be more concern with the Moral conflict of Making Money and Being First to Market regardless of the Technology's threat to humanity...Doomsdayism.

4 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

When I hear rich atheistic people talk about "moral conflicts" and "doomsday" it tickles me because they're hypocritically using terms for ideas they pretty much reject anyway.
And it's usually over something the average person wouldn't even consider worth discussing.

What ideas do they reject?

4 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

There's nothing moral or immoral about using AI.

Like all tools it depends on what Purpose it is being used for...

Unlike most tools it depends on what information it was fed.....or built/based on.

4 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

It's just another tool they've invented to increase production, cut the labor force, and explore innovation.
It could be good or bad depending on your perspective.

Unlike most tools AI makes Decisions.....that can and does affect the life of human beings.

Whether through Recommendations or Assisted Decision by providing Information Conclusions and Judgements.

The Threat posed by AI is the possibility of Loss of Control

4 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

But the claim to....whatever they're talking about....leading to "panic" all over the nation is what got my attention.
Many people are dealing with homelessness, power outages, diseases, chronic illnesses, low wages, gang violence, and other REAL PROBLEMS around this nation....so who the fuck is "panicking" over this?

The above is about Control/oppression and Market Protectionism Money making schemes

4 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

.....besides a bunch of rich bastards who's lives are going so great that they have nothing else to worry about EXCEPT this?

AI has been shown to express Racial Bias...to the Disadvantage of Blacks - and to the Advantage of Whites

4 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

Dialysis clinics are popping up all over the nation because of so much diabetes and kidney failure among people....but THIS is causing people to "panic" across the nation?????

Yes.....One wants to solve issue when they are small and manageable..

Rather than when they are large and exploding exponentially...

Diabetes is causing panic in those who are suffering from or with it and their immediate family and loved ones......

For others it is an opportunity

Most everyone else involve in the diabetic world are either in the Food or Medical industry and they are benefiting by making money from it....

4 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

It just shows you how people are living in different Realities as illustrated by their starkly different concerns.

Yes....

Things that panic you or seems as opportunity for others while still other are unconcerned in anyway.....

ProfD

The alarm bells went ot off when the essayist wrote that AI could kill off the human population before the decade ends.

I'd consider it more a matter of crying wolf.

There's no chance AI in and of itself could do this because it doesn't think for itself, it takes it's orders from humans.

However I can certainly see somebody or some group TRYING to kill off a substantial amount of the human population and BLAMING it on AI.

Using this AI warning as a scare tactic or as motivation, if people knew they only had 5 or less years left to live, I wonder how differently they would approach life.

I'd quit working and find other means to make a living...lol.

Some people think it's too scary or morbid to know exactly when you'd die, but I often wonder if it would actually be BETTER in the long run to know exactly when and how you'd die.

Atleast you'd know what to spend time on and what NOT to waste time on.

If you knew you only had 5 years left....I doubt most people sign up for medical school...lol.

But a bet a LOT of people would apply for mortgages on houses....lol.

frankster

Insightful response

It's going to take me a minute to digest it....lol.

frankster

Yes....We all live in our own Subjective Reality and a Shared(agreed upon)Reality... then there is Objective Reality(things as they are)

What's the difference between the Shared Reality and the Objective Reality?

My understanding....I Am open to correction

The Moral conflict that Dario Amodie has been talking about historically is using AI for Life and/or Death autonomous use (without human intervention or decision making input) and Mass Domestic surveillance...by the Security State and the Military Industrial Complex

Since when did "morals" ever become an issue or prevent White folks from using the technology available to them to enrich themselves and oppress others?

They were using the technology at their disposal for mass domestic surveillance and taking people's lives BEFORE the advent of AI....and not giving a damn whether the public agreed with it or not.

The article seems to be more concern with the Moral conflict of Making Money and Being First to Market regardless of the Technology's threat to humanity...Doomsdayism.

See, and this is what I mean about the hypocrisy of these people.

The entire reason they generate this shit is to make money.

Their motive IS profit!

If they were truly concerned about the future of humanity, they wouldn't have continued to manufacture nuclear weapons which are much more dangerous than AI.

What ideas do they reject?

They reject the idea of Beings superior to humanity.

They feel THEY have the ultimate authority.

They reject the idea of Divine Morality....universal rights and wrongs.

They reject the idea of a Judgement Day, that they often colloquially call "Doomsday"

Like all tools it depends on what Purpose it is being used for...

Unlike most tools it depends on what information it was fed.....or built/based on.

Which is why I told ProfD that while AI itself wouldn't try to kill humanity, those who ARE trying to kill humanity may feed it information on the best methods to do this!

And ofcourse, they'd then point to AI and make the claim that AI was trying to kill off humanity while hiding their wicked hand.

AI has been shown to express Racial Bias...to the Disadvantage of Blacks - and to the Advantage of Whites

Sure.

If it was programmed BY racists, ofcourse it will express racial bias.

16 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

There's no chance AI in and of itself could do this because it doesn't think for itself, it takes it's orders from humans.

Right. Anything AI does has been initiated by humans in one way or another.

The reality is the people with the most power don't really give a d8mn about who lives or dies including themselves as long as they have paradise while they're on earth.

16 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

I'd quit working and find other means to make a living...lol.

We call that hustling backwards. 🤣

16 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

Some people think it's too scary or morbid to know exactly when you'd die, but I often wonder if it would actually be BETTER in the long run to know exactly when and how you'd die.

Atleast you'd know what to spend time on and what NOT to waste time on.

The main reason people aren't allowed to know how much time they have on the planet is a combination or procrastination & inertia & every other negative form of mental resources management.

The majority of people are quite lazy. They have to be motivated or incentivized in one way or another to go to school or work or volunteer...do something with themselves.

I encourage adults especially middle-aged & seniors to live their lives to the fullest extent as if they only have 5 years left on the planet. Tomorrow isn't promised to anyone.

That way hopefully people will pour their time & energy into things that bring them the most peace & joy & add to their happiness.

What if they live more than 5 years one might ask. Repeat the process. Don't leave anything on the table.

As Morgan Freeman's character Red famously said in Shawshank Redemption "get busy living or get busy dying." 😎

ProfD

The reality is the people with the most power don't really give a d8mn about who lives or dies including themselves as long as they have paradise while they're on earth.

You know what, I hadn't really thought of it like that until you put it THAT way.

I figured many people in power were atheist and didn't care about other people's lives, but I didn't consider that they probably don't even care about THEIR OWN lives....as long as they have fun before they die.

Which makes them even more dangerous!

As they get older and closer to death and know they're about to check out anyway, there's no telling what some of them may do.
Hell, they don't even care about the younger elites who might want to enjoy some of that wealth and power for a few more years, lol.

We call that hustling backwards.

Like Tupac said: Call it what you want just pass the blunt and kick it Money.....

The main reason people aren't allowed to know how much time they have on the planet is a combination or procrastination & inertia & every other negative form of mental resources management.

I would think the MAIN reason people aren't allowed to know how much time they have on the planet is because it's NOT UP TO THEM to know, lol.

It's up to WHOEVER put them here to know the time of their demise.

I encourage adults especially middle-aged & seniors to live their lives to the fullest extent as if they only have 5 years left on the planet. Tomorrow isn't promised to anyone.

That way hopefully people will pour their time & energy into things that bring them the most peace & joy & add to their happiness.

What if they live more than 5 years one might ask. Repeat the process. Don't leave anything on the table.

As Morgan Freeman's character Red famously said in Shawshank Redemption "get busy living or get busy dying."

Man.....

What do you do, save those "sayings" up in a file somewhere to DROP them at just the right time and in just the right place??? 🤣

What a way to end such a profound statement.....lol.

I could actually SEE that scene in the movie when I read that, lol.

Speaking of people who "knew" when they were going to die........

Remember that old White man who got released from prison but he was too institutionalized and couldn't manage living in the outside world.

He ended up hanging himself.

On 9/13/2026 at 7:48 PM, Pioneer1 said:

frankster

Yes....We all live in our own Subjective Reality and a Shared(agreed upon)Reality... then there is Objective Reality(things as they are)

What's the difference between the Shared Reality and the Objective Reality?

Objective Reality is things as they Are....

We humans are limited to only a narrow Range of Perception...

Furthermore we in the West only recognize five forms of Perceptions....Senses

The Ancient Schools of thoughts....Has informed us that Objective reality is primarily Vibrational.

These Vibrations are of Different Frequencies

These Frequencies create Fields/Domains........ of Force Or Energy.

In our Shared Reality we perceive these Vibration as we label define and delineate them....as the color purple or a sound or a cat or star

In short our Objective world as we commonly understand it would look very different if we could perceive beyond our range of perception and had more Senses.

On 9/13/2026 at 7:48 PM, Pioneer1 said:

My understanding....I Am open to correction

The Moral conflict that Dario Amodie has been talking about historically is using AI for Life and/or Death autonomous use (without human intervention or decision making input) and Mass Domestic surveillance...by the Security State and the Military Industrial Complex

Since when did "morals" ever become an issue or prevent White folks from using the technology available to them to enrich themselves and oppress others?

Apparently.....Now it does.

In the past some whites had no scruples on using tech to get what they desired....no matter who or what was destroyed - including other whites.

On 9/13/2026 at 7:48 PM, Pioneer1 said:

They were using the technology at their disposal for mass domestic surveillance and taking people's lives BEFORE the advent of AI....and not giving a damn whether the public agreed with it or not.

True

On 9/13/2026 at 7:48 PM, Pioneer1 said:

The article seems to be more concern with the Moral conflict of Making Money and Being First to Market regardless of the Technology's threat to humanity...Doomsdayism.

See, and this is what I mean about the hypocrisy of these people.

The entire reason they generate this shit is to make money.

Their motive IS profit!

Double speak and Dog whistling.

On 9/13/2026 at 7:48 PM, Pioneer1 said:

If they were truly concerned about the future of humanity, they wouldn't have continued to manufacture nuclear weapons which are much more dangerous than AI.

It would seemed to them or they are making it appear as a serious danger.

On 9/13/2026 at 7:48 PM, Pioneer1 said:

What ideas do they reject?

They reject the idea of Beings superior to humanity.

They feel THEY have the ultimate authority.

They reject the idea of Divine Morality....universal rights and wrongs.

They reject the idea of a Judgement Day, that they often colloquially call "Doomsday"

I cannot agree that all of the above is true of all white people.

On 9/13/2026 at 7:48 PM, Pioneer1 said:

Like all tools it depends on what Purpose it is being used for...

Unlike most tools it depends on what information it was fed.....or built/based on.

Which is why I told ProfD that while AI itself wouldn't try to kill humanity, those who ARE trying to kill humanity may feed it information on the best methods to do this!

And ofcourse, they'd then point to AI and make the claim that AI was trying to kill off humanity while hiding their wicked hand.

True for the most part.

On 9/13/2026 at 7:48 PM, Pioneer1 said:

AI has been shown to express Racial Bias...to the Disadvantage of Blacks - and to the Advantage of Whites

Sure.

If it was programmed BY racists, ofcourse it will express racial bias.

True...

21 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

Man.....

What do you do, save those "sayings" up in a file somewhere to DROP them at just the right time and in just the right place??? 🤣

Nope. Just pops into my head depending on subject matter. 🤣

21 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

Speaking of people who "knew" when they were going to die........

Remember that old White man who got released from prison but he was too institutionalized and couldn't manage living in the outside world.

He ended up hanging himself.

Right. Brooks was a case study in being institutionalized. The man had been in prison for so long & had gotten used to the routine of it that living as a free person was impossible to do.

People are institutionalized in different ways. For example, some folks are afraid to retire from their jobs.

Despite having financial security for the rest of their lives, the retirement eligible person is afraid to let go of the 9 to 5 routine because they don't have anything else to do with that time.😎