Jump to content

frankster

Members
  • Posts

    1,208
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    25

Everything posted by frankster

  1. I have seen no such Proof African Spirituality God = Nature No...You are confirming what was said by him. You quoted Hawkins: Each time new experiments are observed to agree with the predictions the theory survives, and our confidence in it is increased; Yep In the sense that it is not final. cool
  2. I have only told the truth....just not all of it - for some truth is only tangential. Nature is Always Life Giving and Supporting....Humans Mostly see Nature as Positive Lightning does not "Take" Time Life or Sight anywhere? If so Where? Life can only be Transformed and or Transmuted The Life of the Tree has been Transmuted into various.....Micro organism, Flora and Fauna Death is One of the process of Nature....Change and or Renewal. Yes Sir..... if you say that "I am black" then you have confirmed my assertion. That is you Confirming It is a part of the scientific process to continually and repeatedly confirmed theories Ok Then that is you Confirming that "I Said I was Black" There is no confusion on my part....Repeatable Confirming Theories is part of the Scientific Process. .Hence the necessity of Repeated Confirmations....from other sources and schools of thought. Not to worry....I Am Patient You cannot handle that......Whilst science tries to be discrete - Scriptures deliberately obfuscate.
  3. That what I have to add will not change any of the Facts Germane to the case....The difference is inconsequential. Some times more than One meaning....nuanced We covered this Already here is "was actually killing living things.....which is a natural occurrence in nature" Now you confusing Parlance(how we use words) and Meaning. Lightning cannot take....Lightning Strikes Life is Energy....Life can not be destroyed or ended only transformed. No its semantics...plain and simple - let's venture down this rabbit hole of semantics and parlance Where did the "lightning" take the tree's life to....? Where is the Life of the Tree Now? Exactly If you say I was or is black...Then that is you confirming my assertion that i am black - that is you saying i am black if you say that i say i am black...then that is you confirming that i say i am black - that is you saying that i said i was black yes true Yes Never said they were....but context is essential You can....but most people want confirmation
  4. They differ only in degree....it is not a miscalculation. Your own post and definition agree with where I stand on the Issue... Do not confuse semantics with accuracy.... The Tree Gave its Life....To support Life You are Confusing Sophistry and Semantics as Scientific Inquiry. If you accepted and restated that I was or is Black ......Then you have Confirmed my Assertions of Blackness. Fact: In science, an observation that has been repeatedly confirmed and for all practical purposes is accepted as “true.” Truth in science, however, is never final and what is accepted as a fact today may be modified or even discarded tomorrow." https://ncse.ngo/definitions-fact-theory-and-law-scientific-work
  5. True... They both convey the same General meaning - which sufficient. Yes....False equivalence - A part is not the Whole Men are are part of Nature. Then it Life Giving. But they mean the same in the context of Scientific Theory
  6. No Regrets....Always is Good and mostly or tends to is just as good. Then its Life Supporting. The exact words are not there....but different words taken in context means the same. The Quote from Hawkins: "Each time new experiments are observed to agree with the predictions the theory survives, and our confidence in it is increased; "
  7. Yep.. mostly or tends to.....is good enough. Go back later and so how many living things are benefiting from that single tree death....some are unseen. Nature concerns seems to be with.....Life. I have no problem with his definition as seen in one of our earlier exchange Proven Accepted and Confirmed until....Disproven On 12/23/2023 at 2:51 PM, Pioneer1 said: We shouldn't just go around accepting things ONLY because we haven't found a better explanation...yet. frankster said: Yep...... that is the idea.
  8. Maybe not....but it is always Life Giving and Supporting True It wasn't the First and it won't be the Last....Life continues, out with the Old and in with New - Change is The A Universal Constant Well Yes....But were they - chances are their Genes continue on. As Human we should.....The Greatest Good to the Greatest Many. Like how a Three D printer works...Adding Layers and/or Subtracting Materiels - Stacking. New Research Confirms 'Out Of Africa' Theory Of Human Evolution "New research confirms the "Out Of Africa" hypothesis that all modern humans stem from a single group of Homo sapiens who emigrated from Africa 2,000 generations ago and spread throughout Eurasia over thousands of years. These settlers replaced other early humans (such as Neanderthals), rather than interbreeding with them." https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/05/070509161829.htm What SAys Ye now?
  9. Nature tends to be mostly Life Giving and Life Supporting. Really.....Disaster come Disasters Go Big Little or Other - Nature continues On Depends on how they are Stacked or Positioned Theory. Look at the meaning of Theory you yourself posted.....it says Accepted Well yes it is a guessing game...in which experiments are designed to test those guests/hypothesis The Longest-Running Evolution Experiment Patricia Wittkopp - Evolution in Black and White: How Fruit Flies Change Their Spots and Stripes
  10. What we need is Organizations that Address these Issues.....Good news is that we do have them - Bad news is they underfunded and under marketed and under supported. Then we need an Institution that coordinates and disseminate info regarding each individual organizations efforts
  11. Yes Thats nature acting on itself...it can be negative to the individual whilst being positive to whole Ruining nature as we know it.....Changing the Ecology. It was actually killing living things.....which is a natural occurrence in nature Yes it does...to the three True meaning it is repeatable and you can use it to predict outcome No...it goes beyond that. it's has nothing to do with what I Believe or Accept....it's about repeatability and predictability.
  12. It is being told to you right now and all the time. lol..reminds of the analogy of the drowning man cool
  13. It does not Affect Nature.....just the individual or the particular variation of that particular specie Cancer does not affect nature....Cancer is a part/process of nature Consciousness is All/Singularity......Life is One and Formless. Life enters physicality by taking shape(Form)....There are three basic forms that evolves to all other forms- The Dot is first, The Line is second and then The Circle is third or The Domain books Yes,...but you have not confirmed what you believe....I can only confirm that you believe. No your idea has not been confirmed....but the fact that you believe has been No... life on mars has not been confirmed
  14. Paulianity is said to be influenced by Hellenism....to me it seems to be more influenced by the Egyptian Mystery System
  15. That Jamaican brother is out of his depth
  16. How does having red hair affect nature? All Life is One....but is expressed in three (trinity) Originating forms Yes.... Then that's the Miraculous....in Which case a Gene was activated or expressed that previously was(thought to be) Dormant Cool...because they had offspring with mankind i believe they are in this Realm....definitely humanoid and likely of the same specie or close. Yeah....the very definition you posted agrees with what I stated. No a Theory is a theory and can be confirmed over and over and over I see now you are conflating both Hypothesis Theory and Law... layman explanation below.. Hypothesis....A guess postulate or argument - needs to be proven or disproven. Theory....A test has been design to prove (not disprove) the Hypothesis - how and why Law ....The What how and why as an equation is now known
  17. Nature... 1.the external world in its entirety.......https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/nature 2. the phenomena of the physical world collectively, including plants, animals, the landscape, and other features and products of the earth, as opposed to humans or human creations....google dictionary. I am not the one that's confused.. It is the part responsibility for Variation - Variety. Yes it is called Asexual Reproduction. Yes No...The word "kind" basically sharing some qualities in common Only in the sense of seeing my own children....Check out Biogenetic Law/Theory or Recapitulation Ontological Phylogeny cool I think they are a different Specie what say you? You going around in circles... Obviously so can a Theory....be confirmed. The very definition you posted confirmed my assertions by using the word "confirmed" Hebrew Words Are notorious for having multiple meanings..
  18. Cool.... Your use of the word nature is misleading. Mutation is part of Reproductive and Generational process. Without mutation we would be clones of our parents....all appearing and being the same exact organism - Replication/Duplication/Copies. Where did God say not to mutate or evolve? After its Kind - having in common or similar. Evolution is One of the many Processes of Creation ok You are entitled to your beliefs. Yes...what do you think? You are now saying what i have stated earlier. Let me quote what I said earlier"Yes...From both European and Chinese sources.....latest genetics research also confirm out of Africa theory It can also mean it has been proven as true.."believe or come to recognize (an opinion, explanation, etc.) as valid or correct." - google dictionary. True...but most words have more than one meaning as I have shown above
  19. And that is Deviation... Ok Okay....Yes - I understand that it is not a good or neutral mutation for the Specie or Individual. Where is " negative consequences in nature."? All variations are the results of mutation even hybridizations. We have had this discussion already....geography climate diet and culture causes mutations - Then the Mutations are passed on. Where is the Variation without mutation? Cool I know you believe this. Was Yaqub an Anunnaki? Tell me the differences then...?
  20. I thought it was a Deliberate Selection......With now Negative Consequences. I cannot disagree with you more....show/tell of connections and links where relevant. Please Explain Variation without Mutations? okay..."Yakub theory"...I do not accept it.....6600 yrs seems to have some credence. You are entitled to your beliefs. Could be you are confusing the layman use of the word "Theory" and its Scientific use? Ok We will have to agree to disagree on that. Yep...... that is the idea.
  21. How Do you define Deviation? Mutation would lead to Variation.....And Variation could lead Divergence(Speciation). Deliberate outside action to cause Variation Within a Specie...Breed/ing Deliberate outside action to cause Variation outside of or between Species.....Hybridization or Chimera Ok..i can work with that. By Natural you mean Accidental/Random It's still a Mutation....you are saying that the Mutation was selected for Exactly...it is confirmed by other means. Science in large part is all about Repeatability(predictable) and Corroboration(supported). ...Confirmation. The word Theory also means:- " a coherent group of tested general propositions, commonly regarded as correct, that can be used as principles of explanation and prediction for a class of phenomena:" https://www.dictionary.com/browse/theories cool I currently give weight to then both....They come from the stars by way of Africa - we only beginning to know the science involve. A Liar should never be trusted
  22. Yes....Genesis 38 - The Story of Tamar. I Will say the following and will not defend it but the story above will answer all questions...Why i will not explain - it is not my desire to mislead the faithful or the unfaithful. Men Cannot Fornicate....Hieros Gamos
  23. My understanding of Evolutionary science is basic...All Adaptations are the Results of Mutation - Not all Mutations are Adaptations. They are basically Three Categories of Mutations - Good, Neutral or Bad....Only Good Mutations are called Adaptations. So yes they are both ends of the same process Natural selection starts the process and Adaptation is the End Result. White Skin is Good as it allows for more Absorption of Vitamin D and Bad because it also absorbs more UV radiation...which causes Skin Cancer An opportunity/adversity cost analysis...Hence the reason I say it is a mutation but unsure as to whether or not it is an Adaptation. The Inuits(Eskimos) who are exposed to greater cold and sunshine did not experience this mutation of whitening skin....raw. Check out the Barona/boraano tribe of Kenya and the San(Bushman) of Southern Africa. Yes...From both European and Chinese sources.....latest genetics research also confirm out of Africa theory Africans themselves say they come from the Stars Cool got Any links?
  24. The Diversity is significance because within the diversity ever human trait or characteristic exist. The More Genetic diversity in any Genome the longer its been around....Time/Descendants equals Diversity/Mutations. "the average African genome has nearly a million more genetic variants than the average non-African genome.1" https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002929722003172 That maybe True Only because There are Many Africans in the USA. There maybe more Genetic Diversity in a Single African Village that the whole entire rest of the World that's orders of Magnitude.... The History of Africa is that it is the BirthPlace of Mankind... Where you get this from? Fine........Think we had this discussion already
×
×
  • Create New...