Delano

Pioneer I am mostly interested in predicting the future and describing the past. My approach is to describe events both past and future and when they have or will happen. Check out what I wrote in predicting the future using Astrology about the US Presidential Elections.

Cynique. You asked the question.  Hopefully the other candidates show up and not just Trump.

Troy I wrote that around September 2015. 

Troy 

Did anything major transpire between August 21 - September 4, 2015.

I jeir goal is personal enrichment. You willknow ewho Obana is based on what he does once he leaves the office.

Here's the delineation.

The 2015 United States of America Presidential Elections

The people Want a leader who will hide their true motives and 

be the firm but unpredictable mother. However they will change 

their mind 26 days after the Inauguration of the Presidnet. 

Let's call them Lily.

The second type of cadindidate, is a radical or free thinking 

individual. Who is comfortable walking and working with the 

movers and the shakers. And They like him they just don't 

undersatnd him or her. This person starts out building 

consensus and then switches gears after 14 days. Let's call 

them Mark.

The third candidate is the what the country actually needs. 

They are a true leader that realizes that people generally are 

not ready for change. So you have to force it upon them. What 

is interesting about this leader is  they have elemnts of both 

the first and second candidate. Check the news 3 years and 10 

months 16 days ago Nov 1 2011. The should show up oct 29, 2015. 

Lets call them Harry 

Unfortunately the most popular person at the moment is the 

person most likely to start a world war.

There is a fourth candidate, very unlikely to win though. They 

may come fromm the conservative party. However they are a 

moderate. They almost defy classification. They don't have 

alllegiance to bad policy or ideas. They just are interested in 

what works.

On 26/09/2015 at 5:28 PM, Del said:

 

 

Ok I did a reading about the upcoming elections on 17 Sept 2015. Yeah Cynique your sentiments echo my delineation. Troy your close but it could be much worse.

 

Here's the delineation.

 

The 2015 United States of America Presidential Elections

The people Want a leader who will hide their true motives and 

be the firm but unpredictable mother. However they will change 

their mind 26 days after the Inauguration of the Presidnet. 

Let's call them Lily.

The second type of cadindidate, is a radical or free thinking 

individual. Who is comfortable walking and working with the 

movers and the shakers. And They like him they just don't 

undersatnd him or her. This person starts out building 

consensus and then switches gears after 14 days. Let's call 

them Mark.

The third candidate is the what the country actually needs. 

They are a true leader that realizes that people generally are 

not ready for change. So you have to force it upon them. What 

is interesting about this leader is  they have elemnts of both 

the first and second candidate. Check the news 3 years and 10 

months 16 days ago Nov 1 2011. The should show up oct 29, 2015. 

Lets call them Harry 

Unfortunately the most popular person at the moment is the 

person most likely to start a world war.

There is a fourth candidate, very unlikely to win though. They 

may come fromm the conservative party. However they are a 

moderate. They almost defy classification. They don't have 

alllegiance to bad policy or ideas. They just are interested in 

what works.

 

 

This is a repost from Sep 2015. What do you make if it now.

It's like the populationhas been bewitched and ccan't think rationally

The Big Bang was named by the opposing Astrophysicist. It was an attempt to belittle the opposition by giving it a title that is crudely sexual. Do even Astrophysicist resort to name calling.

Hwy also said he wanted to be paid like Rock Stars

 He did some small musical festival may have been France. One if his ewqusat wa he got to use a Ferrari. Apparently he wanted a  Black one but it only cane in Red.

Troy do you do a background check before listening to an artist. It's a good point. O don't think I could enjoy an artist that abused someone I knew. Ijhave to think about your comments deeply. Otherwise I am an accessory or St least condoling violence

Don Cheadle , Jeffry Wright and Tony Leung are my favourite actors.

Miles Davis was a brilliant musician with a interpersonal issues. I Don't confuse the artist with the art.

Unity is about putting aside minor differences  to gicus on larger issues. 

One year before I was born black people had a hard time voting. And unemployment is always double the national rate. 

Sitting a the table without utensils.

A friend had pledged. We remained friends. Yeah I am just not a group person.

Cynique The Academy work award you an Honorary degree based on your rhetorical accuity.

Platonically yours,

Del 

Mel Hopkins that sounds right. Perhaps we need to not have our " children laden with our baggage "

Are you linking this to the third eye.

Cool

Cynique it feels chaotic. Just based in what is happening.

Troy list the link when you get a chance. You should imuse your name on the birth certificate.

That's interesting about the numbers. It makes sense of though in hindsight. Although the answer doesn't make sense b t mos "choose" it.

I came to the project without an opinion . In the help with intervening years I have not persuaded anyone to Dig a bit deeper. Or to examine their position .

On 22/12/2015 at 0:25 AM, Troy said:

I bet if you continued the analysis to include the most recent 30 years the trend would continue, more likely accelerate.

 

I would not be surprised to see a positive correlation between population and C02 emissions.  Though I don't the mere presence of more humans is causing the problem, it is their activity that is problematic.

 

 

No its not. You would think there would be an increase at the beginning of the Industrial revolution. But there isn't. You would think you'd sew a appeared me in WW I or WW II. You think you would sww a spike with increase production but you don't. There are some nice graphs but no science. However I did skim it

 So I'd you cam across some interesting numbers. Or even a scientific sounding argument please post it.

And cows. I could post the analysis or raw data. In the absence of science most have swcuses one way or the other

This is what "scientist" say according to the Great Wiki.

The models do not assume the climate will warm due to increasing levels of greenhouse gases. Instead the models predict how greenhouse gases will interact with radiative transfer and other physical processes. Warming or cooling is thus a result, not an assumption, of the models.^[127]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming

You may find a future predictive model, but not a historical descriptive model that links production to temperature. Which subtly is infirmative. I just took ten minutes. And I couldn't find one. Take the challenge. Don't believe me don't believe the scientist the sceptics. Just take ten minutes and search for a climate change regression model. If you do find it post the link.

Okay but my position is from looking at the data. You will never see a regression model. Because the data doesn't tell a story that will motivate people to change. What I find interesting is that neither scientist diacyaa the link. Climate is also different than weather.

How much do you want to bet? 

I conducted a statiatical analysis of the data because I wanted to make up my own mind. So I had to look at the factors that effect weather. I stopped discussing it  because most people are debating it from an uninformed emotional position. And they are adamant either for or against. Even the scientists are making unscientific arguments on both sides. Ponder or figure it out: The Sun's activities effects  weather on earth; Why did they change the name from Global Warming to climate change. I am not trying to convince anyone. Just encouraging some research or fact finding then thinking or questioning. I happen to have time to do so others may be time poor. It takes up to much time to become informed because it cuts into Entertainment. 

Okay but my podition is from looking at the data. You will never see a regression model. Because the data diesnt tell a story that will motivate people to change. 

I did a statistical analysis from about 1700 to 1980. I looked at yearly data. And there's a stronger link between population and CO2  than production and CO2. You will never see a regression model linking CO2 and production because it doesn't exist.