Jump to content

RM Interviewer

Boycott Amazon
  • Content Count

    39
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

3 Neutral

About RM Interviewer

  • Rank
    Regular Member

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. RM Interviewer

    Richard Murray Fanatacism Audible

    Round 14 Audio LINK Listen to "Richard Murray Fanatacism Audible" on Spreaker. 0:39 The Selecao in the Tournament of Nations 6:17 Trophe Des Champions 2018 7:41 Cameroon Clockwork 8:08 Vinicius Time 11:43 My womens clubs preseason so far Transcripts R1 , R2 , R3 , R4 , R5 ,R6 , R7, R8 , R9, R10, R11 , R12, R13, R14, ? Articles Botafogo Star: Pereira guidance , ? GoalChatter: Women's clubs must survive , ? Thoughts Egypt in the 2018 world cup , Argentina in the 2018 world cup, Query or list of ideas to get Conmebol, Caf, AFc, CFU to block UEFA or NAFU from winning the Qatar world cup or getting to the final , Sarri in Chelsea summer 2018 , Did Africa win the world cup when France did to you? , Non Futebol Best 11, why do we not blame owners for fiscal problems , UEFA Champions LEague 2018-2019 group stage predictions, ? Richard Murray Thoughts Series Kings of London Epic Poem Series Women Soccer Players Say Paper Richard Murray's Fanatacism Paper
  2. RM Interviewer

    Richard Murray Fanatacism Audible

    2018-2019 UEFA Champions League Group stage final placements Group A Atletico De MAdridMonaco Borussia DortmundClub BruggeGroup B BarcelonaInter MilanPSV Eindhoventottenham HotspurGroup C PSGNapoliLiverpoolRed Star BelgradeGroup D I don't know Locomotiv Moscow/Porto/schalke/ Galatasaray Group E BayernBenficaAjaxAek AthensGroup F MCFCShaktar DonetskHoffenheim OLGroup G Real MAdridRomaCSKA MoscowViktoria PLzen Group H unknown first three places Juventus/Mufc/ValenciaYoung Boys
  3. RM Interviewer

    Richard Murray Fanatacism Audible

    Why do pundits/people/commentators/fans have a problem mentioning owners when they speak to salaries? If I am walking the street and someone hand me a check for a million dollars, what value does my accepting the money have to the quality in the financial transaction? The answer is none. When Cr7 or MEssi were waiting on getting more money from real madrid or fc barcelona, all pundits talked about them, they want more money. It is odd argument most people give; it is the following. A potential financial transaction I do not like. I will mention the receiver in the transaction , not the provider. And, I will suggest the receiver , who has none of the value, is not negative for receiving it. That is silly. Is it not? Jerry jones/Dolan/the laker owners/glazers for MUFC so many are bad at their job on the team, that is the financial transactions But pundits /fans/ et cetera have no ability to state how bad they are. When a player is not scoring or a coach is tactically false on a constant basis they are demerited. but when owners are fiscally foolish on a continual basis they are unmentionables. Jeter/Kobe both milked the lakers or yankees respectively, but none of it was their fault. No one needed to say they are comfortable to them getting the money. Say you are angry that the owner is making a bad deal. Treat the owners like you do players/coaches and that is what most , stemming from the slavemaster culture in the usa are unable to do. Blame the owners/stockholders to the car companies when the cars are fiscally expensive but poor quality, don't blame the engineers. Blame the elected officials when the law is dysfunctional, don't blame the voters. Blame the sport team owners when the salaries or fiscal funds are inappropriate, don't blame the players/coaches. Mention the people in control to an issue, not the people absent power concerning the issue.
  4. RM Interviewer

    Richard Murray Fanatacism Audible

    Good Morning good afternoon or Good evening, wherever you are listening. I am richard murray and this is the richard murray fanatacism audible Round 14 august 8th 2018 I am in google plus as Richard Murray Fanatacism , I moderate a community in google plus called wsplus spelled w-s-p-l-u-s I am in twitter as thetenner10 t-h-e-t-e-n-n-e-r-1-0 Leandro Stein wrote an article about the Brazilian Women's national team exit of the Tournament of Nations in the online publication Trivela, shared to me by Izzy , on twitter as Izzyfutfem, spelled I-z-z-y-f-u-t-f-e-m And while I concured to the article, if you are reading linked below or if you are listening in transcript or blog linked below,it had two absences of high value. The primary is the culture in Brazil. I am a fan of Olympique Lyonnais, as a fan to french mens soccer, I was and am still happy a french team had a purposeful investment in womens soccer. But, I recall thinking the culture in France was a huge block long term. In FRance, womens athleticism is accepted, as a ballerina/ballroom dancer/swimmer/ice skater but most in france looked and still look negative toward women exhibiting athleticism in some forms. Notice what I communicated, exhibiting athleticism, not being athletic. In the victory of North Carolina Courage against Ol feminin you saw the thirty to forty year gap on wide accepting exhibitions to female athleticism in the usa opposed to France. Comprehend, Ballet/Ballroom Dancing/Swimming/Ice Skating especially figure skating are highly athletic but are accepted from most in France as what is warrant from women. Now to the selecao, while most in France have a negative view on many exhibitions to female athleticism, but not all, in the Global Latin American community, the populaces from the geographies Africa or Asia, the commonly accepted athletic exhibitions from women are usually far less. The reality is, whether people want to admit it or not, in many homes in asia/africa/the latin american community... in brasil young females, we call girls, are not given opportunity or inspired through words or action to be athletic outside of preparation for pregnancy. And, that is the primary problem in the brasil womens national team. Brazilian women love futebol. I know enough of them to say they love it more than any other female geographic group; they cheer louder, pray harder, cry in defeat more deeply, support more firmly than all other women but they barely put the ball to foot. Marta herself said it countless times, she had it rough as a girl. Most males or females from any age range opposed her throughout her journey in brazil. What does this mean? This mean brazil, like the rest of conmebol, Leandro Stein's point about the conmebol womens championship as a competition to the brasilian womens team underlies the following point, is developing female teams based on female populaces being blockaded or challenged away from futebol, as an athletic activity. The CBF, the brazil football association, or any club in brasil is not powerful enough to cause a cultural shift in brasil to change the accepted athletic displays for woman amongst the brasilian populace. The Second point is the structure to the womens game in brasil. The simple blunt truth is clear. It will take a financial loss from clubs or state associations or the CBF itself, yes all three levels will have to lose money for an extended period to create a multitiered /geographically displaced/athleticially competitive system that is robust in the states, at the state level and throughout the confederation. And, said money will not be returned once invested. Most of said money will only result in a return in the quality to womens soccer in brasil. Leandro Stein is correct, the selecao is warned but heeding the warning will require fiscal investment absent any return on investment financially. The cultural scenario in brasil to womens athleticism is beyond any money to change but the CBF/its compartments/their members can at least lead by example. NO SPEAK original article http://trivela.uol.com.br/o-adeus-da-selecao-feminina-no-torneio-das-nacoes-deixa-um-grande-sinal-de-alerta/ google translation https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=pt&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Ftrivela.uol.com.br%2Fo-adeus-da-selecao-feminina-no-torneio-das-nacoes-deixa-um-grande-sinal-de-alerta%2F&edit-text=&act=url referring tweet https://twitter.com/Izzyfutfem/status/1025548651811270656 SPEAK PSG's goal is to win the UEFA champions league. yes they defeated Monaco in the Trophe De Champions two thousand and eighteen edition four goals to zero but they did not play in a way that look like it is ample against a semifinalist or finalist in the UEFA champions league. Thus, from my account PSG is win-lose-draw 0-0-1 in terms of their play's appearance in ligue une or the coupes convincing to top play in the uefa champions league, yes for me, today was a losing day. Their midfield was too slow. Neymar got injured last year tracking back trying to push the ball forward. In Brazil, when Tite played Renato augusto/casemiro/paulinho , neymar was unpressured when he tracked back cause he had three true box to box midfielders who liked to make runs to adjust. PSG don't have three midfielders in that fashion like Brasil so, Tuchel has work to do. Congratulations to Clarence Seedorf side PAtrick Kluivert for becoming the coach and assistant coach to the Cameroon National Team. I think it is a great move cause Cameroon is young and they are ripe to be guidened. I have watched Vinicius for Real MAdrid, for me, the front line of the selecao for the Copa America is Vinicius jr/ Neymar jr/ Douglas Costa The Midfield is Casemiro/PAulinho/Renato Augusto and if Tite want more dribbling skill in the midfield three while keeping the work ethic then play willian next to casemiro/paulinho The front line of Brasil men in my opinion need to be Vinicius jr/Neymar jr/D Costa the midfield four need to be Marcelo(Alec Sandro or Felipe Luis replacing him)/Casemiro/Paulinho/Renato Augusto(Willian replacing him) the defensive three need to be Marquinhos/Miranda/Thiago Silva ...The following players: Coutinho/firminho/g jesus/g barbosa/danilo/fernandhino are all the bench players. Coutinho doesnt offer danger on the ball like any in the front three nor does he offer midfield work like any of the midfield line. Coutinho is a great player but only good for a substitution from injury at best for me. firminho or g jesus or g barbosa are not tricky players; they are small number nines who like the great Raul from Real MAdrid are great poachers, can connect well, but do not offer a speed or dribbling skill or strength that frightens opponents and that is why they don't work well with Neymar who at his best has a speed of dribble and a skill in the tight game that requires like folk about him. Danilo or fernandhino are good players but danilo does not offer the artistry from dani alves thus he can not be the mirror to marcelo. and fernandhino does not know how to play safely from attack to defense. The Selecao are getting even stronger, the next world cup they will be favorites. I just hope if they find a system like in the conmebol qualifiers, they maintain that system with the same type of players in the world cup unlike that gamble in using coutinho as renato augusto, which failed. OL feminin had a decent preseason, in that losing to North Carolina courage will make sure they start the season sharp, ready, not overconfident or lax. To be blunt, OLympique Lyonnais womens team have yet to have a season where they need massive changes and as such, they keep rolling through the seasons. The only issue is the UEFA champions league final. In the last three editions, OL won but all needed extra time and when I think to the coupe de france final 2018 or the lose in the international champions cup final against north carolina courage, I see OL at a crossroads. The team has world cup winners throughout, a ballon d'or winner, champions from england/germany/japan/holland all throughout the team. But teams will bunker hard against them and they have shown a little fatigue at handling that. Now I admit, the coupe final and international champions cup happened at the end to a long season but I will wonder how sharp how fast OL is near the end of the 2018-2019 season Atleti feminin had a one goal victory against everton to end their recent preseason match. I think it is the last but I am uncertain. Atleti women are current champions of spain and won back to back last year. Chelsea Ladies ended their preseason strongly , 3-0 against juventus women. Chelsea Ladies I am proud of cause they came through the adjustment to a fall schedule top of england. Francesca Kirby, Lady Ji so-yun and company are alive.I just want to say, I wish Eniola Aluko well in Juventus side Lianne. My Turbinin , Turbine Potsdam have made a few moves, potentials, and I am truly proud they are able to remain a womens only club as they are the last one I follow. All others I follow were always sisters clubs or became sister clubs. Gladbach ladies I barely get to see, to be blunt, but I will watch their results closely cause they have to battle and stay up this time. Gladbach to be fair are gender equal and as the mens team develops players and sells, utilizing their youth, so do the women. Over time the project will grow. AC Milan ladies formerly BRescia I am uncertain too. I know it has been a storm in many ways behind the scenes , becoming a womens team to a sister club so I will let it happen slowly. Santos ladies currently sit atop Group B in the Brasileiro with nine points left to play for having earned a seven point gap already. One win and they top group b for the playoff amongst group leaders. The paulisto just started , they drew a match with only eight to play in their group altogether but once the Brasil serie a1 group status is certain they can make adjustments and focus on the paulistao to climb the table and strenghten their position. INAC Kobe are at half the season in Japan, they sit one point under Beleza. To be fair, like Turkey in the mens, I find the japanese womens league to be the most competitive in the womens, beyond one or two clubs but a set of four to five per season. That is refreshing. But, I hope INAC can reclaim what is rightfully ours. Japanese winters can be tough thus the late november to early march break. I think Japan can think to a summer/fall dual championship to create more competition. ... All in all I am content to the teams I support, which is not new, cause I have never felt like a womens team I support went wayward organizationally. ...Well that is it for this audible round. Any questions, please contact me in the african american literary book club as RM Interviewer ... be Safe END SPEAK Timing from Spreaker, infer main questions, place in aalbc article side google post 0:39 The Selecao in the Tournament of Nations 6:17 Trophe Des Champions 2018 7:41 Cameroon Clockwork 8:08 Vinicius Time 11:43 My womens clubs preseason so far
  5. RM Interviewer

    Richard Murray Fanatacism Audible

    Non Football best 11: a 433 system. Mikhail Baryshnikov Jimmy "Superfly" Snuka/ Bill Russell/ Aleksandr Karelin/ Johnny Weissmuller Bruce Lee/Yoda/Toshiro Mifune Barry Sanders/Tina Turner/Rickey Henderson
  6. RM Interviewer

    Richard Murray Fanatacism Audible

    I realize that some are trying to be positive no matter what, bring a positivity to miscegenation/immigration where some deem it negative. Some like Jessica Amadi, many like her, suggested and suggest that CAF or Africa won the world cup through the French national team. I can not accept that. but I comprehend this is one of the many cultural battles in sport that relate to the world outside the pitch. France won the world cup. If the French team that won either of France's world cup's prove anything, it is that the issue in CAF is not talent or available talent but organization. When I look at France/Holland/England/Portugal/Germany/Italy and see all the players who have parental ancestry somewhere other than the flag they play for I say the countires to their parents need to improve their flag team setup, and convince talent to play for them, make as much an effort as possible. Choices mean people can choose what they want, nothing is right or wrong, but saying CAF wins the world cup when a team use mostly players whose parents are from CAF does not favor CAF or any Football association in it? does it?
  7. RM Interviewer

    Richard Murray Fanatacism Audible

    Well, I watch Serie A, unlike many in here. Napoli's Sarri never won a title based on two principle. First, no rotation, Sarri like to use a standard elevent throughout the entire season in all competition. Second, his strategic rigidity. Napoli never once knew how to control a match, his all out attack style is meant to score plenty of goals on lesser opposition and outscore equal or better opposition. In my mind I imagine Willian/Hazard/Kante/Cesc/Pedro are all gone for various reasons. Hazard/Willian/Kante to UEFA CL clubs which chelsea is not and neither of them has the age to risk 27/29/27 respectively. Cesc or Pedro is 31 /30 and neither have the fitness for sarri's system over time. Victor Moses is a very good player, but I don't know if he is willing to leave england, i think he will be wise to go to China. and at 27 he needs to become a regular starter, he can not afford to risk a benching role though Sarri's system can help his game. Moses may remain at Chelsea. I think Morata if wise remain in Chelsea. Going back to my original points, Sarri's system that does not use rotation and is hyper offensive, require three things from all players in all players in attacking/midfielder or wide defensive roles: fitness <if you do not have the fitness you will not last a complete season in all competitions starting>, close quarter passing/dribbling skills <if you are easily trapped or limited in dense passing scenarios sarri's system is not for you, because he wants to push the attack>, youth <now you will say his napoli were on average late twneties to early thirties and that is true and thus confirm my point. Fitness is a great thing and is mandatory first, but in all earnest, Sarri's system is a young man's game, I don't care how fit you are. Napoli were collectively fatigued every season under Sarri cause absent rotation, even having fitness, the fatigue in may/june in all tournaments showed and in england absent a winter break, it may be even worse> Thus my chelsea starting 11 options for 2018-2019 should be In defense Rudiger/Zappacosta/christensen /emerson/Zouma in midfield Jorginho/Barkley/bakayoko/Musonda in attack morata/batshuayi I think all others outside goalkeeper in the current squad are players that need to leave if they want to be starters or need to leave if they don't want to be run into the ground or need to accept a bench role that will not be as active on the pitch. I think higuain is an awful choice, the english game is defensively more athletic than tactical and higuain has never been in it. Morata already proved that a player from spain/italy's game not used to the physicality in england can be battered quick, and he is younger than higuain. Hazardproved in seasons past, one good season is followed by a lukewarm one, amplified by the world cup and made more possible by sarri's system that in the english game, will run hazard into the ground, cause I don't see Sarri implementing rotations. If Hazard/Willian/Cesc/Kante/Azpilicueta/Pedro/Cahill side all other applicable leave chelsea,for whatever reason I like the possibilities to the players I highlighted using Sarri's system. they all have good fitness, good youth, and have some ability in tights spaces. And, will not demand, Sarri change his napoli system which i do not think he will, since he had three season to implement rotation or strategic change. he did neither in three season in napoli in five season in empoli or napoli.
  8. RM Interviewer

    Richard Murray Fanatacism Audible

    Good Morning good afternoon or Good evening, wherever you are listening. I am richard murray and this is the richard murray fanatacism audible Round 13 july 12 2018 I am in google plus as Richard Murray Fanatacism , I moderate a community in google plus called wsplus spelled w-s-p-l-u-s I am in twitter as thetenner10 t-h-e-t-e-n-n-e-r-1-0 The two world cup semifinals matches were, France versus BElgium side England versus Croatia France versus Belgium was the same story as Japan versus Belgium or Brazil versus Belgium, Japan/Brazil/France each had true chances in open play whereas Belgium had far less, but none from either, punished Belgium for the defensive openness they have. Roberto MArtinez did not bring the most complete midfielder Belgium have. KDB Witsel Mertens Hazard all are too impotent defensively, especially working as a team. But, Japan and Brasil paid for not taking advantage of blunt chances, the japanese center forward, coutinho, renato augusto, giroud will all look at their chances and woe them. But, France scored through an umtiti header post set piece and defended stoutly to undermine Belgium's strategy of counterattacking teams. As a small point, I love when teams like MCFC/Belgium/Barca suggest counterattacking teams are not playing soccer. The foulest thing in sport is when a loser suggest the one who made them lose is not playing the sport. Croatia versus England was another reality check for an overhyped imbalanced team. England's EPL player core, are like Argentina absent the attacking flair while having greater defensive strength. If Argentina had england's defenders or England had argentina's attackers the lack of true midfield quality from either would not matter. On the reverse, croatia is a complete team. MAndzukic is a true number nine. He can work alone and is willing to constantly press alone, battle alone and challenge in the air or back to goal. the midfield four in Croatia , not just rakitic/modric but the other two all work for each other. I can see Rakitic has lost how he was at sEvilla being at Barcelona, but Modric has maintained his ways and the other two midfielders positioned themselves accordingly to retain pressure or aid defenders or make up the midfield positions. The backline of Croatia are warriors, no nonsense defenders. Perisic is not a foil, but the two legged player, like llalana who was not brought for england, offers that danger on the ball, no other croatian player has. ?The third place match in the 2018 world cup will be between england and belgium. Some have said this match is worthless, others have said professionals do not care about it. The problem in the third place match is depending on participants, it is a joy or beneath their self driven view to themselves. Turkey loved being in the third place match. I think Belgium should be invigorated. Belgium has never won a world cup medal and never placed so high. This world cup is the best for Belgium through where they placed. It will show roberto martinez as a coach or the belgium team as a squad if they treat this rare opportunity as a less than. England while not a heavy trophy lifting team, tend to make it deep into competitions relatively. I think Harry Kane as a captain will prove his worth. He need to show he can get england to play hard, opposing the common media narrative which is that the tournament is over for england or belgium. I can not say which team will come enthused. If both come enthused, the rotations from coaches will have a huge part to play, so I will not predict a score, but I predict Belgium will come more inspired to this match, not cause of Roberto martinez but cause some players will want the world cup where belgium reached higher than any before to end on a high note. I think many players from england may succumb to the common media narrative. ?France versus Croatia will be a battle. Croatia will remain consistent and play counterattack while Deschamps has geared his team to play counterattack, thus, this match is delicate. If France try to play to more possession they risk a counterattack from Croatia and I am not certain, Mbappe is ready for that on his side. But, if France play defensively, the match will be a grind. I think Deschamps will play is safely, and I know Croatia will, thus, a cagey final. ?You know, with the final match arriving to the world cup, I think about some of the things said to this world cup , things that this world cup reaffirms. First, in club soccer many people in media tout the guardiola's/roberto martinez's/mauricio sarri's as entertaining but defense is always the beginning to lifting trophies. Mourinho and Conte proved with Chelsea defense first side a sharp attack is the way to go. I argue that Guardiola's success last season in the epl had as much to do with the lack of quality defenses in england as his high press attacking system. Real Madrid won three straight UEFA champions leagues based on a defensive block utilizing, casemiro/modric/sergio ramos/varane or pepe using bale/cr7/benzema to cut through on attacking measures. Juventus dominate italy based on defense. Even Monaco was able to pry ligue1 from big money PSG based on a great defense. Many have said this world cup has proven that possession is overhyped but the truth is possession was always overhyped. When the italian teams dominated uefa, it was defense first. When liverpool had their great age in the 1970s they had a steel defense that flew through king kenny. Defense is always the dominate winning force. Modern media, unlike media in the past can sell lies better , wider, deeper and thus create illusions old newspaper folk could only dreamt. Defense always wins out most of the time in the beautiful game, cause the goal is to get the ball past a player, who has help. Most sports in the usa are designed or managed to oppose this position. This is why, in the modern NBA teams evaluate scoring three pointers over dunks. In the modern NFL, great quarterbacks are left defenseless while expected to pull off throwing miracles. In baseball, fielding has died as most teams have athletes to bulky or clumsy to catch well or to crude a hitter to challenge outfielder positions. In the usa, the media dominance has allowed the fandom to mirror the agenda to the owners. but in soccer, the one truly global sport, the agenda to those in england or some clubs can not refute truth that is allowed to exist beyond the borders of the money or most potent communities in humanity. So that a government tiny in populace or land like croatia can show greater quality than the usa, a government not represented in the 2018 world cup, or that a country like France, who tried to keep algeria/ ivory coast, indochine as satraps, now uses players whose lineage is from their former or current satraps to defend french honor. The earth is big, no one way from any human people can dominate it. Nothing in sport reflect that better than the beautiful game... This will be the last Audible for a while, but I will keep posting on the aalbc blog and reshare on google+ or twitter thoughts on the beautiful game whether in womens or mens. ...Well that is it for this audible round. Any questions, please contact me in the african american literary book club as RM Interviewer ... be Safe END SPEAK Timing from Spreaker, infer main questions, place in aalbc article side google post 0:47 World CUp 2018 Semifinals 4:08 third place match 5:50 the final of the 2018 world cup 6:38 final thoughts on the world cup
  9. RM Interviewer

    Richard Murray Fanatacism Audible

    Good Morning good afternoon or Good evening, wherever you are listening. I am richard murray and this is the richard murray fanatacism audible Round 12 july 7th 2018 I am in google plus as Richard Murray Fanatacism , I moderate a community in google plus called wsplus spelled w-s-p-l-u-s I am in twitter as thetenner10 t-h-e-t-e-n-n-e-r-1-0 CONTENT ?Round of eight matches were... France versus Uruguay, absent cavani, the attack from the back in uruguay was not as sharp. Brazil versus Belgium, belgium did a mourinho though few will admit and absent a starting dani alves/casemiro/renato augusto who won brazil the 1st place in qualifiers, brasil were not as balanced as they could be. England versus Sweden was an anglish team dominating sweden in their own aereal game, which reflect influence from the English premier league Croatia versus Russia was a fight, the host against a very determined team , in the end penalty battle went in favor to Croatia ?Final thought on the round of eight, afc/conmebol/caf/cfu the asian football confederation, confederation of sudamericana futebol, confederation of african football, caribbean football union have a problem. The problem is UEFA side the USA, the union of european football associations side the united states of america. The reality is during the second world cup in Brazil one confederation had not won three world cups in a row, UEFA achieved that when Germany defeated Argentina. Now, in Russia, UEFA will achieve four world cup victories in a row, and in that finals, only one from eight participants were not from UEFA, that being argentina in the second brasilian world cup. Qatar will be in four year and then a world cup using more teams will be in eight years. UEFA is in a very dominant phase, that if the other confederations want to stop, they will have to change the way things are. I already know afc/caf/conmebol/cfu are fiscally disadvantaged compared to uefa or the usa, which finances many big clubs in uefa, but if the other confederations want to do better, they have to figure out a way that Meunier from belgium does not play side Neymar. Meunier from Belgium you can see watched neymar for a whole season and knows his moves. this has to end. I do not have any money to influence or administrative positions to regulate or control things in the futebol world. But, i can see that this world cup has become a European championships with invitations from others, and as UEFA get more slots by their ever strenghtening coefficients, that will only give UEFA more teams into the expanded world cups in the future and a greater chance to dominate all rounds in the competition. If those who finance or administrate CAF/COnmebol/AFC/CFu or any clubs within want to undo UEFA dominance, they must disasssociate from UEFA in as many way as possible. If said people do not want to undo UEFA dominance, then keep the status quo, but it is inevitable. UEFA, is in a golden period, everything is in its favor. UEFA have the strongest financed leagues, that attract the best players from outside uefa, that are able to develop local talent, from native or immigrant stock, the immigrant stock usually more willing to play for the uefa country than the non uefa country their parentage is from. UEFA have more slots than any other confederation in the world cup. UEFA is on top of the world, and the world cup is merely a european championship in disguise, as things stand UEFA has only one threat to its dominance and that is the radical unknown. On a media note, I always thought that the happiest fans, the most entertained fans were the ones whose team lift the trophy at the end. some keep suggesting this world cup is the most entertaining ever. I assume that means, Qatar will not be as entertaining. I can not see the future but if one event which is part to a cycle is the most in anything then all the events before or after in the cycles repetition have to be less than. If this current world cup is the most entertaining from world cups that happened, then you are suggesting that for every country this world cup was better for them than every other beforehand. I can not imagine, any fan bases from past winners who can not see their team lift the trophy: brasilians/germans/italians/uruguayans/argentineans/spaniards OR fans from teams who can lift the trophy but have not earned it yet: the french or english so far can say this is the most entertaining world cup. Now, i realize one countries fans is not all in the world, but i mentioned six teams with huge fanbases in the soccer world. together, that is many fans. The world cup is a great event, that is it, one edition to the world cup is not better or worse, the only aspect to world cups that can be related is how any particular team succeed in the editions. In this case, for belgians/russians who i do not think ever reached this far in the tournament, this is the best world cup ever. for english or french, until they win it, you can not suggest this world cup can compare for their fans they way it was when their teams won it. for croatians, they need to reach the final for this world cup to the best ever. NO SPEAK share thoughts to improving CAF/CONMEBOL/AFC/CFU < https://aalbc.com/tc/blogs/entry/225-richard-murray-fanatacism-audible/?do=findComment&comment=426 > SPEAK ?round of four is France versus Belgium and England Versus Croatia Brasil did have the opportunities I said they would they simply did not capitalize. France will to against Belgium, like Japan did as well , I wonder if Belgium can get through three teams who outplayed them. Japan got tired at the end. Brasil could not finish all the chances, as I said. France will have matuidi and if they finish their early chance, the way brasil did not, if they finish their late chances the way brasil did not , they will rout belgium. If France are unable to put the ball in the back of the net like Brasil, Belgium can squeeze through again. And after France versus Argentina I am certain, referee favor, not illegal bias, legal favor or bias will not go to France but go to Belgium. England versus CRoatia, two teams that came to the semifinals on penalty kicks, one surviving their second in this tournament, the other surviving their first in recent history. I imagine it will go down to penalties again, as unlike SWeden Croatia have players that can expose england problems, while like sweden they can battle england on athletic or skill terms. I say another penalty match and Croatia win. ?I assume the final will be France versus Croatia, and the third place match will be Belgium versus England. I have it on record in the transcripts that my final was france/brasil, which was ruined through table placement. but, so far i can still see one from my final in the finals. ...Well that is it for this audible round. Any questions, please contact me in the african american literary book club as RM Interviewer ... be Safe END SPEAK Timing from Spreaker, infer main questions, place in aalbc article side google post CONTENT 0:35 Round of eight 1:55 round of eight final thoughts 7:28 round of four 9:18 final match and third place
  10. RM Interviewer

    Richard Murray Fanatacism Audible

    Ok, CAF/ Conmebol/ AFC teams are all out of the tournament. I hear many people talking about this or talking about that. but what does conmebol/caf/afc have to do , to improve their teams, that does not involve UEFA. Many will oppose the following but UEFA is the problem. When I look at this world cup, it has become functionally a european championships with invites from others. When the world cup after Qatar comes, what will become of the world cup? The world cup in russia round of 16 had one half of the bracket all uefa teams except colombia and the other half a proper world cup. Now some will say, it is a competition, these things can happen, it is not indicative of anything or needs to generate such a negative posture toward uefa. but when you look at France/England/Germany/Belgium whose players rosters have lineage from throughout CAF/AFC/CFU but were unwilling to play for the parents from their forebears. What do CAF/AFC/CONMEBOL/CFU <caribbean football union> need to do, to stop UEFA dominance? If FRance win, Pogba/Mbappe are the best in the world. if Belgium win Lukaku/Hazard, if England win, Kane, Ali, STerling, the UEFA media powers will make sure , like with germany or spain before, UEFA is positioned in a godlike role above the other confederations. Considering BRexit/Trump/immigration antagonists in continental europe against those immigrating from africa, CAF/COnmeBol/AFC/CFU need to show greater pride in themselves, and in their people, no matter where they live. Just cause you move to a place to make money does not mean you have to play for their flag. What do CAF/CONMEBOL/CFU/AFC need to do? How does UEFA get totally knocked out of the round of eight in Qatar? CONMEBOL/CAF/AFC Japan-Nigeria-Ghana-Ivory Coast-Egypt-Brasil-Uruguay-Argentina-China-South Korea how do they improve to make it happen? I want ideas a list of ideas, anything, guest comment. I admit i am pumped. in four years, qatar is coming. In south africa, i had to suffer spain winning. in brasil i had to suffer germany winning. Now in Russia, someone from UEFA is winning. UEFA has three straight world cups, let the reign end in Qatar, CONMEBOL/CAF/AFC/CFU have to get better, against the north atlantic. <western UEFA/North America >
  11. RM Interviewer

    Richard Murray Fanatacism Audible

    Good Morning good afternoon or Good evening, wherever you are listening. I am richard murray and this is the richard murray fanatacism audible Round 11 july 5th 2018 I am in google plus as Richard Murray Fanatacism , I moderate a community in google plus called wsplus spelled w-s-p-l-u-s I am in twitter as thetenner10 t-h-e-t-e-n-n-e-r-1-0 ? The round of sixteen began with France versus Argentina, to me, this match proved the fiscal power in messi or the hype machine against non white athletes, cause, I figured western UEFA france will not be denied fair refereeing, but they were just like Nigeria, and the only thing both team have in common is all the non white players in both. macherano evaded a red, otamendi evaded a red, penalties were evaded in the box on griezzman, mbappe's fouler warranted a red in the penalty he earned, Iheanacho was hit in the face in the box and ighalo had a goal opportunity denied by a rojo arm but, they are wearing nigeria's colors, i comprehend the media hype is high against nigeria thus favoring referee choices against nigeria, but why france? People will speak of great goals from france but for me, the treatment of french players was woeful by the referee. argentinean players were allowed to commit many dangerous tackles on french players and france is lucky none of it harmed a star player: mbappe/pogba/griezzman. Now post france versus argentina, i will start in argentina, ICardi was not selected. Dybala did not play at all. Listen, both of those players are in form and are better than all other options available. why not bring them? i don't care if Icardi slept with every other players wives, he is the best center forward argentina have and must play for them... to France, one player and one player alone played badly for France, his name is Olivier Giroud, he miscomprehended great passes from griezzman or pogba, and he missed a chance to score with weakness controlling the dribble. He is going to cost France, like he did in the European championship, against Brasil in the semifinals hopefully and not sooner. DEschamps only brought one center forward and that is not a great move. I dont care if benzema frequented every brothel in every city he ever played in he is the best option in center forward. ...Uruguay versus Portugal was another match that went the way of team play over media hype. I have nothing against messi or cristiano ronaldo but their club teams createa false view to their individual playing styles. Messi or Neymar are allowed an attacking only role in barcelona or real madrid that in portugal or argentina, they are not allowed as the teams are not as quality. Better teams in France or Uruguay knocked out lesser teams. The problem with Portugal going forward is getting team balance correct. Move on from CR7 as the center to the team , like argentina must do concerning Messi. Uruguay are a hard working team, who play one way but do it honestly and as a team unapologetically. France can become lax. Against Argentina they showed a lax of focus in both goals that uruguay's experienced patience can exploit. ...Spain versus Russia was another case of imbalance, like Argentina versus France. Argentina have a bunch of forwards, no midfield, no defense. Spain has many central midfielders but only had one forward, in diego costa and had no wide players, no honest wide players. Jordia Alba is not creative enough. When you compose a team you must compose honest players to make a balanced side. Too many teams are imbalanced and in a larger tournament, against balanced sides like uruguay, like russi are exposed. Russia forced spain to have players who can cut through lines and none did. France challenged argentina to be able to defend absent the ball and defend as a team and argentina couldn't do it. Big names is not what make a team. Balance make a team. Germany like Spain wanted to possess but showed little to no goal getting. I was wrong in thinking Spain would cut through Russia, spain was not tested in such a way prior nor did they prove they had the ability to condense as they press. ...Croatia versus Denmark, was as Aly Wagner said, the day of the keepers , Schmeichel side Subatic were great keepers. ... Brazil versus MExico was eventuality, in the first half mexico tried to score, put brazil under pressure but Fagner /miranda/thiago silva/felipe luis are defensively very secure, they don't add to the attack like when marcelo/dani alves are in fagner/felipe luis position but they support the midfield better. Coutinho to me, is just not working. I think Tite likes him cause neymar is not 100% and having coutinho float around neymar offers that attacking capability but at times he was too slow in defensive cover, too slow in the midfield press. Brazil is not barcelona, brazil do not defend through possession. you have to cover your teammate, and coutinho seem tired in doing it. Mexico played well, Rafa Marquez coming off in the second half destroyed the balance in the mexico and put them under pressure for an entire half. ...Belgium versus Japan ...Japan defended organised themselves the way italy used to as well as how spain or germany need to. italy/spain/germany trying to play like a pep guardiola coached team is their problem. Same too Belgium, who are lacking ideas and open in the back with carrasco in a wide back role and a bunch of central midfielders kdb/witsel/mertens all of whom play centrally and never play wide. Fellaini came in and his physicality over a naturally smaller japanese team proved too much. Belgium scored on two headers, from vertonghen the other from fellaini all based on physical weakness from japan. I think japan was tired and took that last corner in fatigue. Japan did not switch, the entire team played 90 minutes, i wonder about that. Japan must rotate better. ...switzerland versus sweden was a battle as I said, two battling teams and sweden achieved the one goal from forsberg after an assisting deflection. ... England versus Colombia was an even greater battle than switzerland versus sweden, i think both teams have higher profile players but have similar attitudes to toughness or roughness, in the end, england win on penalties, and colombiaa have yet to defeat england in a competition, i must add, the history of colombia versus the usa or uk, the anglophone is quite interesting. Final thoughts on the round of sixteen... The expansion of teams into the world cup in the round of 16 show favor the union of european football associations, uefa, outside colombia , who just left the tournament, one half of the bracket is all teams from uefa, thus these teams will get a coefficient boost that will aid uefa in the overall argument to coefficients and what teams need to get the new slots. To the teams that lost: argentina portugal denmark mexico japan switzerland colombia they each show various issues. Argentina is disorganized from the administration to the pitch, portugal against a team that play a counterattack need to find a roster more potent in possession based attack, spain lacked balance in their roster, one type of player can not be utilized for over half of the positions, denmark battled and lost on penalties, mexico continue to get knocked out by former world champions, japan must find depth in their team.. no substitutions for a whole match against a side physically stronger athletically dominant than yours is unwise, switzerland lostafter letting in a deflected goal .. like penalties they lost an even battle, Colombia battled and they lost on penalties. Three of the teams out of the tournament in the round of sixteen faced an even team , they just didn't win. they did not lose cause they were outmatched. argentina/japan/spain/portugal all have things they could had improved, saw and had time to improve and did not. argentina/spain/portugal/japan needed to improve their teams and had ample time before the world cup. argentina is the most extreme as they did not find a way to play some from their most in form players like dybala or icardi while they never played a system that seemed to connect to the players playing style and always seemed imbalanced, and argentina knew this from the last world cup and the last copa america and never once seemed close to solving those problems, i wonder if they tried. spain did not yet learn from the last european championships absent a xavi who gets a team to compress while also possessing, they need true width, true attackers and playing five central midfielders will not do, portugal should had learned after the euros,european championships, that against a france their counterattack is enough but agagainst a fellow counterattacker they need another system and perhaps other players for that system. Japan from the last world cup should had learned that you must use depth, must have a bench. In the last world cup japan died late in their last match. only one substitution against physically or athletically more dominant opposition. Japan had time to figure out a better rotation scheme but still have not. Mexico is the one team that did not face an equal opponent, Brazil is a better team but I do not think mexico needed to work on something strategic before the world cup outside of group stage management. the truth is, mexico had six points and needed a draw to top the group and evade brasil. they lost and thus faced brasil as second in the group, sweden getting switzerland. Mexico i fancy against switzerland. so... I don't know if more teams will come in the next world cup in qatar and if so how that may reduce the world cup group stages. i know the first world cup after qatar will use three teams in a group,not four thus it will make group stage management somewhat irrelevant as you simply have to win both matches to progress which mexico would had did having won their first two. we shall see. the teams whose problems were exploited must improve, the teams who failed against equal opposition , better luck next time. To the progressed, my final France versus Brasil will be a semifinal the others, russia/croatia/belgium/sweden/england all have issues. Three of them : russia, croatia, sweden have strong defense but no goals, no lethal attack. croatia unlike sweden has a strong midfield but the attack is still lukewarm. Belgium side england have attacks but their defenses are weak. belgium nor england showed defensive strength , and over time showed defensive frailty, which will not be fixed by the next round. ?The round of eight is...Uruguay versus France, Uruguay will deny space, play counterattack and test the midfield defensive team motion of france, absent matuidi, who is on yellow card accumulation. Uruguay may not have cavani which is a huge blow. France should had brought benzema and if they do lose the lack of ability from giroud is the reason. But dechamps as coach has to own his choice in not bringing the best center forward france have to the world cup. Uruguay side France are balanced teams, who know what they have to do. Uruguay is a counterattack team, as well is France so, this will end up made on a set piece or a defensive error in modulation from attack to defense. I say France 1-0 with a pogba long range goal, but penalties is the favorite. Russia versus Croatia is two battling teams,neither have many goals, Croatia will have to get through lines, i think kovacic has a huge role in the game if he starts. Russia like JApan is a serious team, no philosophical nonsense. Football is simple and they play like they are in a short cup tournament and are looking to win, and their fans are the ones who will be happy. outside of long range goals from modric or rakitic, this will be another game where set pieces or errors in modulation from attack to defense will lead to goals. I say penalties and croatia get through. Brazil versus Belgium for me is a brazilian win, belgium will try to score early , play fast early but Brasil will absorb and then dominate the match. Belgium are slow in movement , possession, it is a statistic team that lacks real cutting quality. Witsel/kdb/mertens are not going by anyone, and fellaini is not catching anyone, The midfield of Belgium is soft. The one issue Tite got is who comes in for casemiro. I suspect fernandhino but i hope renato augusto. Neymar will get more than one goal. The only worry I have is a kompany foul on willian or neymar taking either player out the tournament. kompany is not a dirty player but he is a serious defender, he will foul hard and earn a red to stop a goal being scored to keep things even in score, which is how the game will begin. But unlike Japan, Brazil should cut through Belgium more frequently and have a goalfest late that prove them a cut above the rest. Sweden versus England for me is a sweden win. England has a media hype machine about it, that suggest favor where it is not. england have a bunch of players who do not play in a balanced system, a system that all the players seem comfortable in. Sweden will not allow Kane to earn fouls. and sweden has a stronger mentality than england. which they can play a full match consistently. Forsberg will score again. ?I predict the Round of four is France versus Brazil, Croatia versus Sweden. ... I will speak on thoughts to the round of four after the round of eight. ... i repeat, expanding the teams in the world cup is structurally not looking great. it functionally created, one half of the bracket in the round of sixteen as a proper world cup while the other hald was a european championship inviting colombia in. I do not like that. ?lastly, John Obi Mikel's father is safe and the Japanese team or fans clean up are some stories of perservance or kindness or peace overcoming various negativities. I linked them in the transcript .. and what i feared has not come to pass , colombia I hope has calmed down NO READ John Obi Mikel <https://sports.yahoo.com/nigeria-captain-john-obi-mikel-reveals-father-kidnapped-match-vs-argentina-144711130.html> The Japanese <https://sports.yahoo.com/japanese-team-leaves-dressing-room-spotless-even-devastating-loss-belgium-150835246.html> Colombia < http://www.businessinsider.com/andres-escobar-brother-says-world-cup-loss-puts-colombia-team-at-risk-2018-7> READ ...Well that is it for this audible round. Any questions, please contact me in the african american literary book club as RM Interviewer ... be Safe END SPEAK Timing from Spreaker, infer main questions, place in aalbc article side google post 0:37 World CUp round of 16 thoughts 8:56 World cup round of 16 final thoughts 14:04 world cup round of 8 assumptions 17:20 world cup round of 4 prediction 17:55 John Obi Mikel and the Japanese before what i feared
  12. RM Interviewer

    Richard Murray Fanatacism Audible

    Good Morning good afternoon or Good evening, wherever you are listening. I am richard murray and this is the richard murray fanatacism audible Round 10 June 28th 2018 I am in google plus as Richard Murray Fanatacism , I moderate a community in google plus called wsplus spelled w-s-p-l-u-s I am in twitter as thetenner10 t-h-e-t-e-n-n-e-r-1-0 CONTENT Jessica Houara has left Olympique Lyonnais < https://twitter.com/JessicaHouara/status/1009013739880886273 > I am starting to worry about next season. Thomis, abily, petit, houara, hamraoui are all leaving. I hope they will be replaced by hungry, quality players. The starting eleven only has a few positions open but a great team need a great bench. ... Kheira Hamraoui has joined Barcelona... ahhh:( hurts < https://twitter.com/BarcaWomen/status/1009035189035642880> Osasu Obayiuwana shared a thought to an article from the Guardian that is excellent < https://twitter.com/osasuo/status/1008753529379610627 ; https://twitter.com/guardian/status/1008744451718737920 ; https://www.theguardian.com/football/shortcuts/2018/jun/18/eni-aluko-alex-scott-stars-world-cup-commentary?CMP=twt_gu > I paraphrase him, Eniola Aluko orAlex Scott are not suprisingly competent cause they are females, they have the basis to competence in jogo bonito, they have prepared well and have deep knowledge to the sport. I concur to him. The problem is, equaliy. The language to inequality is in the suprise when another has ability. I quote the guardian article : "he breakout star of the men’s World Cup is a woman. It’s not something many would have seen coming. " , that quote suggest surprise, when why is it a suprise that two female soccer players one, recently hanging her cleets up, the other playing for juventus are knowledgeable about the game? Congratulations to them both but truly seeing someone else as able has to come from more than a advertising line, but must come from your inner mind, and if that inner mind has a negative bias, it will display itself. Eniola Aluko is in twitter as EniAlu spelled E-n-i-A-l-u Alex Scott is in twitter as AlexScott spelled A-l-e-x-S-c-o-t-t Osasu Obayiuwana is in twitter as osasuo spelled o-s-a-s-u-o Interpreting law on the pitch or in a private room having video monitors is still interpretation and will always be questionable. V.A.R. is not what people need, they need to accept human error. The idea that V.A.R. would had changed outcomes assumes teams in losing scenarios would had achieved more. For example, england in the hand of god scenario. but having var does england get to face argentina? some like Matteo Bonetti have suggested, VAR lead to equalization but I oppose that position. Human error tends to equalize for all teams in any tournament. and I repeat the truth that Thomas Rongen stated, which i paraphrased in the last round. In the world cup VAR has lead to more goals by penalty or set piece than any other, thus, I am uncertain its effect in a short cup tournament using immature player groupings is yielding the results in goals that people want. And, having goal fest between inequal opposition is derived from FIFA expanding world cup entrants. Thomas Rongen is in twitter as TRongen spelled T-R-o-n-g-e-n Matteo Bonetti is in twitter as TheCalcioGuy spelled T-h-e-C-a-l-c-i-o-G-u-y Thomas Rongen , whom I don't know intimately but from his media persona, seem able to view cultures not his own positively, made a point < https://twitter.com/TRongen/status/1008148212371394560 > to say rooting for mexico is a positive thing. I replied to him: "I wonder for those that are unwilling to root for mexico , were they rooting for germany? In 2014,many brasilians, not all, rooted for Arg as a conmebol member. fans in the usmnt are unwilling to root for the confederation neighbor that was just part to an advertised joint bid. " In amendment, the inability to cheer for a geographically bordering country, in the same confederation as you, from many or most in a populace is telling to who they truly are. Again, I noted this when brasilians had issues supporting Argentina, not all, some, maybe most. I saw this in the fifa voting when all the members of the southern subconfederation in C.A.F. confederation of african football, did not vote for morocco. I see this in fans to the US national team, unwilling to support the flag team to the fa, football association, that just won a joint bid to host the world cup side the usa. BUT, it prove a point I made in an earlier round, Liga MX is the best soccer league in CONCACAf, but the populace in the usa has no history to giving praise to anything foreign, foreign defined as something based outside the legal geographic bounds, especially in sports. Again, mlb,nba, nhl, nfl, representing baseball basketball hockey the gridiron have no competition outside the usa from other leagues. all other leagues in those sports feed the statian based leagues. but MLS, has comparitives, that are much better, far older, and based in governments, fiscally far weaker or poorer than the united states of america, and that truth is why Liga MX is not touted as the best league in CONCACAF, even though they continually dominate the concacaf champions league, which is the premier club tournament in Concacaf. I will always find it odd, that while the usa federal government as well as most states is has elected officials who seem opposed to mexico/mexicans or many other people outside the usa, the us soccer, the statian f.a., football association, has successfully made a joint bid side mexico. That is imbalance in the truest sense. ... by 2026 the united states of america may have a huge wall or many wall network between itself and mexico while also having a trade barrier or restrictor between itself and canada while all three are hosting a world cup, anyone explain to me why that is not crazy ? Jimmy Conrad suggested < https://twitter.com/JimmyConrad/status/1009066454715518977 > that set piece goals are all about concentration side determination, not skill, considering all the set piece goals in the world cup but I think it is a skill. this is my reply to him: "maybe that is the problem, the concept that no skill is involved in defending set pieces is the lie. you have to make quick adjustments from a standing position, you have to read the opposition and not just your marker but your area. it is skill" and in succession < https://twitter.com/JimmyConrad/status/1009072627443367936 > : "well , when neymar has the ball and dribbles through opponents he has to comprehend ahead where they will move, how they move, in set piece defending, many defenders get caught not reading the other markers the larger environment. if assessing a situation is a skill then ..." and continue : "I do comprehend your point. awareness is mandatory, vital, the quicker you are aware the quicker you can adjust, but the best set pieces must be interpreted before hand, in the same way the best defenders in open play read the offense setup, not just mark one guy, " NO SPEAK A stat concerning Japan, Columbia from mister Chipping < https://twitter.com/MisterChiping/status/1009068285483192320> ?FIFA WORLD CUP 2018 Group stage ends and group by group I will go through where I went wrong and end with an assessment to the round of 16. In the transcript, look for my assessment to the group stages, made on december 1st 2017 ...group a, from top to bottom, uruguay, russia, saudi arabia, egypt, I was correct in Uruguay winning group A. I was wrong in egypt, russia, or saudi arabia's placement. Russia at home was lifted but also showed their quality. The russian premier league is not a miserable league even though coming from the anglophone, most media speak ill to it. This tournament proved that. Saudi Arabia like most west AFC members has money, has invested in infrastructure, but is also not spoken well of, unlike russia i never get to see their league. Egypt, as a CAF member, I did wish to progress through. I thought they would battle it through. As i made my group choices last year december, I did not calculate salah's injury in the uefa champions league final into the mix. It is unfortunate he was not able to play all three games. group b, from top to bottom, spain, portugal , iran, morocco, ...I was correct in the top two teams but I did not think Costa would settle. Spain have figured out how to play a true number nine next to five true midfielders, mostly all central midfielders. their movement is key, spain still lack true width and can have a dawdling aspect in midfield but costa allows that outlet and power that can be dangerous. Iran to me were very impressive. Again, like most west afc members, i do not get to see them play. In Iran's case the relationship to the usa off the pitch, like with russia makes this obvious in some way. Morocco to me, lost alot when they lost the bid to the usa. It may sound silly but i think the mood soured and right before a world cup, having the mood sour, especially when morocco a country whose geography is in africa, whose populace is mostly muslim or arab did not get all votes from caf, muslim, or arab football associations, I think played an energetic role. The own goal in their first match just turned the knife in them. group c, from top to bottom, france, denmark, peru, australia, ... France to me have the same problem they had in the euros, olivier giroud. It will always amaze me how the best forward france have has missed a euros and a world cup for off pitch nonsense. Deschamps for me, is a poor coach. I saw the Euros, france were missing the best center forward they have, who has the best striking capability, best passing back to goal, best movement in forward areas, Benzema is the best center forward France have and bullshit, yes bullshit, can not be what a true coach uses to justify not bringing a player. Like The french Deschamps, Dunga did the same to Brasil. He would not bring Ronaldhino whom he knew was preparing for this. Ronaldhino was ready to go to south africa, and dunga didn't bring him. he didn't bring a player that has helped brasil get to three finals being supported by kaka/robinho/ a young neymar , dunga wasted the opportunity and deschamps likewise is doing the same in france. Like in the Euros it will bite deschamps and pundits, who supported deschamps choice, like Ray hudson on beinsports, will not admit a simple truth, if you do not bring the best players available in a short cup competition using a temporary team, you are foolish. Denmark was very precise, and like their northern neighbors or others later on, the expansion to teams is proving to aid UEFA most of all. But, the team I had second was peru and peru made a mistake a number of others made. That mistake is to not start your best player available. Like egypt not playing salah the first game, PEru chose not to start paulo guerrero the first game. the group stage is three games. Brazil , comprehended neymar needed all three games. Star players have got to fight through whatever ails or bothers or hinders them and start all the matches. A wise coach uses a substitution if injury arrives again, but you have to start your best players, the group stage is too short for games. Peru not starting guerrero cost them second and they moved to third. Australia to me were outdone by Denmark. Denmark played the way I thought australia would. Tough in the back, never say day, sharp attacks. I think in some way, australia's coaching change late hindered the team alongside some players a little out of form as well. ...group d, from top to bottom, croatia, argentina, nigeria, iceland, I was correct in croatia or iceland, i said croatia is dangerous. Depth and a potent midfield is the key to croatia, and a true team spirit. The parts of yugoslavia really like being parts. I thought the stable athletic skillful nigeria would override imbalanced, defensively inept argentina, but in the end, one goal difference separated the two. The truth is Nigeria needed to defeat Iceland and didn't, just drew. Had they defeated iceland, it was all over for argentina. but they didn't. Argentina played desperate the whole match against nigeria, did not pay for their fouling. But achieved two goals through the defensive gambling in nigeria. But argentina are not balanced and it shows. Iceland are a solid team but in the world cup, unlike the Euros, most of these teams have talismans from varying qualities that will expose the lack of specific quality in the average icelandic player. ...group e, from top to bottom, brazil, switzerland, serbia, costa rica, Brazil is a favorite, largely cause even absent marcelo, dani alves, douglass costa, they have the depth to handle all three not available and still be a balanced side full of craft or goals. I figured switzerland who are hard workers who also have flair and technical skill would overcome, serbia who battle but are lacking some goal power or costa rica who have a strong defense but few goals in them or players that can make a large march to goals from deep. ... group f, from top to bottom, sweden, mexico, south korea, germany, I have to first admit my lack of researching skill. anyone who paid attention to the last four world cup winners from fifa will see they each did not get out of the group stage in the next tournament thus why will germany be other, no reason exist and germany continued the tradition from france to italy to spain to present. Each time a uefa team win the world cup they come back after four years using a similar squad who are not the same. Brazil, a team used to winning, more than any other, overturns the best over time. Sweden proved they are better absent zlatan, it is not that zlatan is a bad player but his unique physicality side skill set make it hard to find teammates who are similar to him. paul pogba is one of the few if only top player who like zlatan is not confined to the common definition to the role he is given. Zlatan is not really a traditional number nine or ten but a unique player who can play various roles in the attack or midfield based on a mix of skill side physicality like paul pogba. Mexico fell in the last game but showed in the first two that they are dangerous when they get it correct, in a sharp counterattack but have a physical softness when pressed by a physically daunting team like sweden, which is unlike short south korea or artistic germany. South Korea showed more grit and physical determination than germany in the last game. They can take that idea and build on it, they also need better finishing. Song can score goals but his role in the team is midfield facilitator, they need someone to be a natural goal scorer. Germany are suffering from the modern coach syndrome, that is when modern coaches prefer players who are midfield esque throughout their team and place to little emphasis on phsyciality or determination or total team play, not jsut attacking team play but defensive team play. Germany played a team that was built to play prettily but lacked athletic danger, lacked a true team play mentality in defense, midfield, or attack and it showed. ...group g, from top to bottom, belgium, england, tunisia, panama, I admit i have a caf preference thus tunisia. Belgium topped the group in the third match showing their quality is greater than england, but england did not have to progress. I wonder if belgium will pay for not being challenged in the group stage, especially in midfield absent nainngolan. I dreamed for tunis, but the dream ended quick. Panama to be fair fought well, as they did in the qualifiers, but the lack of playing on more ambitious teams as well as small teams who dont suggest high ambition which will make the players for said teams more sharper. Panama have talent but their players do not have access to teams to grow it better. ... group h, from top to bottom, colombia, japan, senegal, poland, I admit C.A.F. bias, Senegal could had progressed. To be fair, they did not based on yellow card accumulation which is from referee bias, which does exist. But, like Nigeria against Iceland, Senegal needed to defeat japan to put pressure on the conmebol team they faced next or make their entry into the next round easier. Senegal had no reason not to defeat Japan, they just did not. Poland is like wales, lewandowski can not undo the weakness throughout the polish squad no more than gareth bale can the welsh but the uefa qualification model is the problem. It like CAf, AFC, Concacaf, uefa has a qualification model that does not challenge enough and allows the luck of the draw to favor the fiscally impotent flags while give the fiscally potent an easy path. Final thoughts, CAF members must develop their domestic leagues while improve their qualification model for the world cup . See the transcript for the link to my idea < https://plus.google.com/b/113017478177192749610/+RichardMurraysFanatacism/posts/GynW3nTpnzs > AFC or UEFA must also improve the quality of world cup qualification. All coaches to every team must realize you have to start your best every single game, no question. Three matches do not allow for the rotational concepts in league play or domestic cup play. Video Assistance Refereeing is not goal line technology. Goal line technology is mechanical it assess a true or false situation. V.A.R. is more opinion from referees in a video conferencing room added onto to the opinion from referees on the pitch. Getting calls correct is not why VAR was needed or how it was advertised, most calls absent VAR were correct from referees. V.A.R. was sold on the idea that it will get calls correct absolutely. But this world cup proved that to be a false advertisement, which common sense people like me side others said from the beginning but those who own or control the beautiful game, overrided through their power which enforced advocacy from all over the media element in the soccer world. V.A.R. does not guarantee a team will not be denied a just call, it merely provides another fiscal cost to the beautiful game and gives pundits who could not accept human error on the pitch, a displaced referee whom they can accept being erroneous, that being a referee in a video conference room. very silly to me, but again, the people who own or control have given it support in western uefa or the usa thus it will happen their but Gladly! most of the football associations do not have the time to waste on a fiscally costly system that offers nothing over what is already present in the game. To the round of 16, match by match,the most important thing is yellow card, red card accumulations, as that can force adjustments in the round of 16 that teams do not want Uruguay versus Portugal ,will be a battle, two teams who defend mostly and counterattack well, neither possess well and both have danger in attack, as well as collective steel in defense. I sense a close game, and I will say go to penalties, and uruguay will go through, cr7 missing a penalty. Both teams are healthy but whomever progresses will probably not have a player for the round of eight. France versus Argentina, will be a blowout win for France. Argentina are slow in defense or midfield and france may be the fastest in attack, as well as the most athletic in midfield overall. Lastly, Mbappe, Griezzman, Dembele, Giroud are far more media loved than Iheanaco and if they are fouled like Iheanaco was the penalty will be given. I say france earn an early penalty and score many goals, argentina are blanked. France nor argentina have any player unavailable but I think France must be careful, while routing Argentina, argentina will try to terminate players with very malicious fouls. I expect a top player from France to be injured out of the tournament or maybe the next round, hopefully not pogba but i will call an otamendi foul on pogba, as a mirror to sergio ramos on salah. Brazil versus Mexico, is interesting, Brazil have the athleticism to stun Mexico like Sweden while they have the skill to challenge mexico aside their physicality at the same time. I think this can be a rout. Mexico have talent but brazil is the epitomy to what mexico or all other latin american sides want to be. Hector Moreno will be out and as a starting central defender that will mean mexico will face brazil using an uncommon central defending duo. Belgium versus Japan, is a rout for Belgium, Lukaku is too strong for any defender from Japan and the speed or strength on average in Belgium will exploit the lack of physical strength in japan. Belgium can attack in any way, and Japan do not offer much in attack but a patient counterattack that is not sharp enough. Belgium again, are not challenged enough to show their weaknesses. Belgium or Japan are fully available. Spain versus Russia, is tricky, like Uruguay, Spain have in diego costa that knife that can cut through russian defense. but, unlike uruguay spain have a soft midfield that russia can outwork. Whomever scores first has an advantage as Russia can not open up to midfield strong Spain while Spain can not play rushed to an eager or hard working russian team. Smolnikov is out, no matter who is the right back, russia will not be attacking from wide alot. I say one goal win for Spain but Russia score. Croatia versus Denmark, is a battle, a team that has a great keeper and defends as a team with a lukewarm attack against a team that has a strong midfield with a workhorse number 9. this match is another battle. I say penalties at the end. Both teams have players who work hard for each other. Denmark win on penalties. Sweden versus Switzerland , is a battle, and heavy yellow card influence. Sebastian LArsson, a midfielder, is out for Sweden.Lichsteiner side Schar are out for switzerland, the swiss backline is all new for this match. This will be a grind and sweden will win the penalties. Colombia versus England, is interesting, England is all about speed and youth. Colombia may not have James Rodriguez which is bad for their midfield out passes. England have danger all over. Colombia have more experience especially facing tough matches and that may help them catch england on the counterattack and measure the game well. But England can fly on Colombia. I say, Colombia shock England 2-1 victory for Colombia. Thus I predict in the round of eight, uruguay versus france, brazil versus belgium, spain versus denmark, sweden versus colombia My final of France/Brasil can not happen sadfully , I wish it could. NO SPEAK My Thoughts on who would progress from December 1st 2017 , I took this off from a google plus post Group A — Russia, Uruguay, Egypt, Saudi Arabia Uruguay Egypt Russia Saudi Arabia Uruguay are battle tested, and in egypt/russia/saudi arabia they don't have a contestant who offers an offensive danger that will startle uruguay. Egypt through salah have a determined group, they have fought hard to be in this competition. I think they can gain more points than Russia or Saudi Arabia. Tough tournament for Russia national team, I hope the players can keep their cool. Group B — Portugal, Spain, Iran, Morocco Portugal Spain Morocco Iran Spain are very dangerous but in Portugal they have a team that know them well and is in a positive modulation post Euros. Morocco is a team that battles , and will bunker and counter throughout the group. I have not seen much of Iran. The Spain /Portugal match will be huge. Group C — France, Peru, Denmark, Australia France Peru Australia Denmark France have a good group. None of the other teams have attacking abilities that can destabilize france and the athleticism side skill from France is something only Peru has dealt with regularly. PEru/Australia match will determine who gains second. Tight matches that can waver in the second spot. Group D — Argentina, Croatia, Iceland, Nigeria Croatia Nigeria Argentina Iceland Croatia is a very dangerous team and the most balanced team in the group. Nigeria is underrated and they have youth coming up who will be more mature during the cup led by a free Mikel. ICeland is a very trained team and if Croatia/Nigeria/Argentina underestimate them then they will lose points. Every match matters, every point matters. The team that start out winning will have the advantage. Group E — Brazil, Switzerland, Costa Rica, Serbia Brazil Switzerland Costa Rica Serbia Brazil is the class but must not treat any of their group mates less than. The second place spot is a clear battle. BEtween Switzerland/Costa Rica/Serbia it is a matter of fine details Group F — Germany, Mexico, Sweden, South Korea Germany Mexico Sweden South Korea Germany has the best blend of athleticism/skill in the group. Mexico is very skilled and experienced to european teams. If Mexico does not lose to Germany they can top the group. The first match in this group is vital. Sweden got in through the backdoor but they must try to come in balanced. South Korea has three teams that will test them in all ways. They must focus. But, if results go wise, they can gain second. Group G — Belgium, England, Tunisia, Panama Tunisia Belgium England Panama Tunisia is a very simple team, defend and counter. They do this throughout the CAF qualifiers. they will not change. Belgium is being coached to be a possession based team which means they are open to the counter. England did good in the UEFA qualifiers but like always once they get into the world cup the higher quality exposes the weakness in the england squad. Panama will battle, any draws they get to other teams will highly influence the ending table Group H — Poland, Colombia, Senegal, Japan Senegal Colombia Poland Japan Senegal will be hungry and in Colombia or Poland do not have an opponent as dominant or experienced in world cup play. Senegal or Colombia can cut through Poland and Poland through the European qualifiers was never tested as much. Japan will play a very attacking style but Senegal or Colombia are counterattack tested and have the patience to cut through them. SPEAK I will post another audible after the round of 16. ...Well that is it for this audible round. Any questions, please contact me in the african american literary book club as RM Interviewer ... be Safe END SPEAK Timing from Spreaker, infer main questions, place in aalbc article side google post CONTENT 0:37 I am worried for my Lyonnais 1:10 Women's equality 2:50 Interpreting VAR 4:18 loyalty in a neighborhood watch 7:32 set piece goals 8:43 World Cup 2018 group stages 20:27 World Cup 2018 group stages final thoughts 22:21 World Cup 2018 round of 16 assumption
  13. RM Interviewer

    Richard Murray Fanatacism Audible

    6/25/2018 I hear many speak about Argentina in terms of best players, or best players, but I rarely hear the world balance? What is the balance? Brasil has balance. Yes, Brasil have a talisman in Neymar, like Argentina have in Messi. But, Brasil have balance. Brasil have played a 433 like barcelona while argentina can not? but why? Brasil have wide back players argentina do not have, in felipe luis, marcelo, dani alves, danilo, fagner, each from them if argentinean are a starter. These wide back players push the attack from deep. This allow Neymar to play a freer role. Dani Alves requires more safety and had great balance to Willian who is a true team player. But, with Alves injured, Douglass Costa was placed in the mirror role to Neymar ahead of Fagner and the balance was made in the last match; in that match Fagner played safe, and allowed Douglas Costa to attack instantly, thus Neymar was not as fouled cause the attack had balance. But, in the midfield, Casemiro/Paulinho/Coutinho offer everything any team need in midfield. Defensive cover, passing to control the flow of the game, running between lines or into spaces or in cover absent the ball. Brasil have not only great players, but great players who together can make a great team. Now, you can argue that a team not have balance in all sectors. Look at Spain, spain have only one forward capable in a team full of midfielders. the key is that iniesta/isco/silva/thiago/busquets all are used to moving about and making shapes in a midfield setup, thus five midfielders can create their own brand of balance. yes, spain is not a big goal scorer having that setup but they at least can reach a balance. Argentina have five forwards, who are used to midfielders providing them the ball. Aguero/Di Maria/Messi/Higuain/Dybala all receive the ball, sometimes helping the midfield to build. thus, if you play those five, adding the fact that argentina have no quality wide backs, argentina's natural system with their squad is 325. If argentina had icardi, they could be a 3241 as icardi is a poacher. But, thus the problem. Messi wants to play a possession game and his team clearly are a counterattacking team. Sampaoli will have to get argentina's attackers to learn to play deep in a counterattack , or get players to play outside their routine at clubs. One thing is certain, if Argentina are imbalanced against Nigeria and Nigeria play a 334 system, like the last match, which showed balance, Argentina are in trouble cause argentina's defenders are the weakest element in Argentina. As a support to CAF I hope Nigeria win. Ending question, why did Brasil never call up diego costa, no disrespect to G Jesus, whom I think, like his MCFC conmebol teammates, fernandhino/danilo/aguero are all poor in flag competition this summer. is not as potent as Costa would had been, thus why brasil never called him up? part of me think it is Dunga's influence. Dunga did not bring ronaldhino to south africa and Scolari was only a short stop gap for Brasil. I think Tite would had brought Costa in, and that true power is what Brasil need up top. Short flag cup competitions are not like club cup or league competitions,, they are far shorter and require instant connection. No time exist to build anything and i think that is why many conmebol players in guardiola teams have issues in their flag side. Argentina need balance, can all its great players side its great coach find it? Ol messi , need a merry old goal and a merry old goal he need...
  14. RM Interviewer

    Richard Murray Fanatacism Audible

    6/25/2018 Egypt has a strong history in CAf as al ahly is the best club historically, the egypt flag team has the most cup of nation wins, but their world cup history is very poor? any thoughts to why? https://twitter.com/KayLMurray/status/1011279442398851073
  15. RM Interviewer

    Richard Murray Fanatacism Audible

    Good Morning good afternoon or Good evening, wherever you are listening. I am richard murray and this is the richard murray fanatacism audible Round 9 June 19th 2018 I am in google plus as Richard Murray Fanatacism , I moderate a community in google plus called wsplus spelled w-s-p-l-u-s I am in twitter as thetenner10 t-h-e-t-e-n-n-e-r-1-0 CONTENT This edition will be short. And may be the last until after the world cup, remember to check the AALBC blog for information on the next posting and with that being said, big thanks to @JimmyConrad for stating $431 dollars per ticket for the usa world cup. I wonder what the price to morocco's if they would had won? Jeremy st Louis has clearly never been fiscally poor to jibe to savings in reply to jimym conrad's statement I quote Maame Dede Williams: <https://twitter.com/darmooh82/status/1006935816931815425 > All those tweeting crap about countries who didn’t vote for the #United2026 bid, get off your high horses. Hosting the WC is earned not a right. So stop complaining & calling other countries names because they exercised their sovereign right. No one owes U an explanation! ?? ...My reply to her is: that is to be expected , you have to realize if morocco or usa won, the ones who voted against the usa would be criminalized in usa media. Thus only Cuba abstained from voting. ... now getting into the voting is interesting. A friend of mine came from small islands in the caribbean, who have been denied aid from the usa, they all voted for the usa, including dominica who voted against the usa in the prior round. Gary Bailley stated how can countries like bahamas vote against the usa, considering the repurcussions. If only the caribbean would had abstained altogether. The map from a ny times article display it well < https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/06/08/sports/worldcup/fifa-vote-world-cup-2026-host.html > All in concacaf voted for the usa. All but brazil in south america voted for the usa. I will love to know why or how brasil didn't but then all the others did vote for the usa. I know story is there. Most from UEFA voted for the USA which is expected. Spain did not vote, which is interesting. France side Italy, netherlands, belgium, voted for the morocco bid. In AFC, Iran voted to neither usa or morocco. In Far east Asia it played out in some way obvious. But had interesting moments, One china, peoples republic or taiwan, voted for morocco. Hong Kong, oddly enough voted for the usa, while china/north korea/macau/taiwan all voted for morocco... hmm In the end, while the usa was able to finance all the votes in concacaf outside cuba, morocco was not able to regale all from CAF/all muslim/nearby UEFA to vote for them. Nearby uefa in spain/italy/france voted for morocco. but the following is a listing of countries that have majority muslim populations or are in the confederation of african football or the caribbean football union that did not vote for Morocco, make of them what you will. afghanistan , anguilla, antigua and barbuda, bahamas, azerbaijan, bahrain, bangladesh, barbados, benin, botswana, british virgin islands, cape verde, curacao, dominica, dominican republic, grenada, guinea, guyana, haiti, indonesia, iraq, jamaica, jordan, kuwait, kyrgystan, lebanon, lesotho, liberia, malaysia, mozambique, namibia, saudi arabia, sierra leone, singapore,south africa , saint kitts nevis, st lucia, st vincent, suriname, trinidad and tobago, turks and caicos, united arab emirates, uzbekistan, zimbabwe ... after looking at who voted against , southern C.A.F. members lost any future claim to caf unity to me, if any country from the southern C.A.F. want to hold a world cup the other countries in c.a.f. who voted for morocco must vote against them. I have heard many in the south africa's , zimbabwe,s botswana's, talk about uniting caf, and yet they voted this way. for me, caf unity is finished. To the C.F.U., they all could had abstained or voted none of the above, like cuba. but c.f.u. unity is finished for me, cause when you can vote for a country that is hurting your own, that has a negative influence on your own, that betrays the whole point of unity. lastly, muslims, i find it entertaining that the united arab emirates voted against an arab country. Again, do not speak of unity on larger things when you can't be united on lesser things. I asked Paulo Frietas did the brasilian fa say anything about why he voted, he replied < https://twitter.com/Cynegeticus/status/1006950854937796608 > < https://twitter.com/Cynegeticus/status/1006954901933576211 > and basically, the elected official was quite and didn't go into details. i expect, the legal action from the us federal government to former brasilian fa officials side investment oportunities in morocco or debts from the brasilian world cup had a part to play. The official list from FIFA is linked in the transcript < https://resources.fifa.com/image/upload/voting-results-for-the-2026-fifa-world-cup.pdf?cloudid=vpnl19m2xr8zk50mnor3 > ... I looked at the future bids to 2030 and 2034, it seems the influence to the usa rears its ugly head again. Argentina/Uruguay/PAraguay have a collective bid for 2030. all the countries in caf that voted for morocco must vote against them, on pure principle. a southeast asian collective want to joint bid for 2034. ... I remember when Japan/south korea joint bidded. It was japan's world cup with south korea getting some matches. if this goes to the inevitable then one day we will see confederation bids. where essentially, the world cup rotates from confederation to confederation in a simple sequence where confederation make joint bids from members. having a voting process to regions in confederations makes the single vote augmented too much. we will see. ...Maame Williams is in twitter as Darmooh82 spelled d-a-r-m-o-o-h-8-2 Jimmy Conrad is in twitter as JimmyConrad spelled j-i-m-m-y-c-o-n-r-a-d Jeremy St Louis is in twitter as jrstlouis spelled j-r-s-t-l-o-u-i-s Gary Bailley is in twitter as Paulo frietas is in twitter as cynegeticus spelled c-y-n-e-g-e-t-i-c-u-s ... and remember to check out articles from outside the anglophone to comprehend what others are saying about the usa victory ... like the following < https://globoesporte.globo.com/futebol/copa-do-mundo/noticia/voto-do-brasil-no-marrocos-desata-crise-diplomatica-na-fifa.ghtml TRANSLATION https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=pt&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgloboesporte.globo.com%2Ffutebol%2Fcopa-do-mundo%2Fnoticia%2Fvoto-do-brasil-no-marrocos-desata-crise-diplomatica-na-fifa.ghtml&edit-text=&act=url > I learned from Paulo Frietas detailing the issue of brasil voting against the other conmebol countries. From the article conmebol had arrived with a planned block vote to regale, not enforce concacaf through the usa lead to vote as a block for argentina/uruguay/paraguay as a joint bid. The brasilian fa head knew but he chose to vote for morocco. While the USA did its best to eliminate as many people as possible from fifa who were in potent positions in denying the usa a world cup, those people have others who will always resent the usa for what it did and that repurcussion will be seen or unseen in the administration to the beautiful game globally NO SPEAK quotes from brazilian article : "The formalization of the support was in a document made public by Conmebol on April 13, the result of a meeting of Conmebol Council - of which Nunes is part - held in Buenos Aires. The agreement would be ratified in two other meetings of the same Council, one May 11 in Asuncion, and another on June 11 in Moscow. Colonel Nunes, 80, was present at all." : "At Conmebol, which cemented support for North America, CBF's attitude was understood as an inexcusable betrayal. In exchange for support for the 2026 World Cup, the South American confederation hoped to have the votes of the North in the vote to choose the venue for the 2030 World Cup, when a candidacy made up of Argentina, Paraguay and Uruguay must face England." : "This Thursday, therefore 24 hours after the crisis created by Coronel Nunes, Conmebol will promote an event in Moscow to promote its candidacy for the 2030 World Cup. All leaders of the continent will be there to show support for Argentina, Paraguay and Uruguay . In the conversation between cards, Brazil became a joke: "Perhaps it is better for Brazil not to send anyone. They can declare support for the other candidate." Nunes was told not to go there." : "The lack of a convincing explanation on the part of the CBF fueled several speculations, each with some degree of verisimilitude, but none doable. One: it was a retaliation to the fact that the US and Mexico did not accept to compete for the Copa América of Brazil in 2019. Another: Nunes did not vote in the US as a revenge against the country that ended the career of his mentor, Marco Polo Del Nero." SPEAK Kay Murray suggested < https://twitter.com/KayLMurray/status/1007311658182733825 > , and I paraphrase her, over playing quality or tournament need, the bringing together to the global sporting event known as the fifa world cup, is the best part and helps beyond the pitch. ... I think her position has value but structurally, the problem is world cup qualification or the confederations structures. Conmebol in particular has to add more members to is confederation to sustain the conedration model, uefa has too many countries already. AFC or CAF have so many countries they can tolerate the growth more. I think the cfu, the caribbean football union may break up into a north and south version, or at least, need to, with the south joining conmebol. I consider southern cfu, the lesser antilles side the south american cfu members. If fifa keeps growing the members to the world cup, conmebol will need more than three new members to maintain the competitive advantage in their qualification model. ... some have opined that conmebol side concacaf need to combine a kind of soccer based monroe doctrine. i do not like that idea. the usa has already shown its ability to use its government to influence fifa, doing this will only make it stronger, and fifa will become like the united nations or olympics, a usa based organization masquerading falsely as global. ... I responded to kay with the following : a structural question is: will conmebol add members to maintain quality in their qualification model? a cultural question is: are most communities in modern humanity desiring unity side each other? ... check out the prose from romelu lukaku in the player tribune, shared through kay murray, linked in the transcript. Kay murray is in twitter as kaylmurray spelled k-a-y-l-m-u-r-r-a-y NO SPEAK Romelu Lukaku players tribune article < https://www.theplayerstribune.com/en-us/articles/romelu-lukaku-ive-got-some-things-to-say?utm_source=social&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=worldcup18&utm_term=Lukaku > tweet < https://twitter.com/PlayersTribune/status/1008560263182897162 > referral < https://twitter.com/KayLMurray/status/1008909366920085504 > SPEAK Res Roma will join ACF Brescia and become a sister club. While ACF Brescia will become AC Milan, Res Roma will become AS Roma < https://plus.google.com/b/113017478177192749610/116860551396466062603/posts/U17zEUxC6oE > The news came from Isabella Lamberti in WSplus , please go to the transcript to read the news. ?To the copa mundial ...that the results so far from this world cup prove that Video Assistance Refereeing like refereeing absent video assistance, picks or chooses when it operates, ala the goal against Brasil from Australia. Miranda was pushed in the back, if following the law is the point, then not following the law is... what... Confederation of African Football members have been hurt by penalties and set piece more than any other. This proves that the refereeing in C.A.F. will no longer suit the refereeing in the world cup. I still advocate not implementing video review in any tournament or league. but the competitiveness in C.A.F. has to grow. In the transcript I have my idea that was created for the womens game, but is applicable in the mens game in CAF. < https://plus.google.com/b/113017478177192749610/+RichardMurraysFanatacism/posts/d3FoSrqJERB > CAF must become more competitive in all flag based or club based competition. Dani Alves injury was massive. I wish Tite was brave and play a 343, utilizing Miranda/Thiago Silva/Marquinhos in the back, and in midfield Marcelo/casemiro/Paulinho/Willian and in the attacking trident use Douglas Costa/Neymar/Coutinho Gabriel Jesus/Fernandhino/Danilo to me, need to all be on the bench. they are all good players but they are all tuned to the guardiola way and each offers little to nothing in the individual artistic threat that permeates the others. the 433 when Dani Alves played side Marcelo worked cause the artistic attack had balance as marcelo side dani alves both are electric from the wide back role. The only way I can see the 433 remain is if Felipe Luiz can play a false right back role. thus, casemiro/paulinho/renato augusto can play in the midfield. two from thiago silva/mirande/marquinhos can play center defense. and then Neymar G jesus Willian can play up top with marcelo as the right back and felipe luis as the false left. Lastly, if Napoli taught me anything and this relate to Mexico, when people start crying and becoming very emotional at the end of a match that has not decided anything with many matches to go, they can truly slip up. we will see how mexico handle the next match. ...Well that is it for this audible round. Any questions, please contact me in the african american literary book club as RM Interviewer ... be Safe END SPEAK Timing from Spreaker, infer main questions, place in aalbc article side google post CONTENT 0:40 USA wins the 2026 world cup congratulations but here is some information you may not know 9:32 More world cup entries will force a change in conmebol 11:36 Res is not AS 12:11 world cup thoughts
×