Notice how SPECIFIC he was in his criticism of BLM  and didn't push the typical right-wing Republican narratives about the movement.
Nor did he let the hosts trick him or trap him into focusing ONLY on BLM when it comes to political corruption when they come no where close to the most corrupt out there.

He was SURGICAL in his words and critique.
Pay attention to both what he said AND what he was careful not to say.....less he inadvertently send the wrong message that we should support one devil (Republican party) over the other (Democat Party).
He said ALL of them do it.....not just BLM or the Democrat party.

Hell, if you want to start exposing political organizations who mishandle money then MOST of them on both the Democrat and Republican side would have to be examined.

This is the type of intelligence that is needed to defeat White racism and it's power structure.
Clarity of thought and focus.

4 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

Notice how SPECIFIC he was in his criticism....SURGICAL in his words and critique.

 

Pay attention to both what he said AND what he was careful not to say.....

This is the type of intelligence that is needed to defeat White racism and it's power structure.
Clarity of thought and focus.

Absolutely. Dr. Muhammad was effective in using his words to make his point.

 

Black folks have to love each other and take personal responsibility and be accountable.

 

As Black folks, we cannot demand or expect anything from anyone else that we're unwilling to do for ourselves.😎

Is BLM still a thing?  How old is that video.

 

All of the NOI representatives, who speak to the general public are highly trained and skilled speakers.

 

23 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

didn't push the typical right-wing Republican narratives about the movement

So, based on your statement, what qualifies as 'typical'?

23 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

Clarity of thought and focus

Not so sure about that right now, at least at a 100% level.

On 10/25/2023 at 5:00 PM, nels said:

So, based on your statement, what qualifies as 'typical'?

 

Take an average post from you as a clear example.....lol.

On 10/28/2023 at 5:16 AM, Pioneer1 said:

lol

Right now, I'm hearing nothing but "noise".

On 10/24/2023 at 2:54 PM, Pioneer1 said:

didn't push the typical right-wing Republican narratives

What's that got to do with it?

10 hours ago, nels said:

What's that got to do with it?

It means he was sincere and coming with his own thoughts.
Not some garbage he heard on Fox News or Newsmax

6 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

Not some garbage he heard on Fox News or Newsmax

Rather odd coming from board that puts more value in opinions and thoughts that are backed up (e.g., cited in reference) by some irrelevant bullsh!t link. Might make one wonder why "Fox News or Newsmax" was called out instead of non-credible non-journalistic full-blown propaganda outlets such as ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN and MSNBC, to mention a few. Perhaps one might want to get their bias(es) straight.

23 minutes ago, nels said:

 Might make one wonder why "Fox News or Newsmax" was called out instead of non-credible non-journalistic full-blown propaganda outlets such as ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN and MSNBC, to mention a few.

Indeed it might very well make "one" wonder....but YOU'D be the only "one" wondering, because the rest of us on here know neither Faux News nor Noose Max are any more credible the others you mentioned..