ProfD Posted February 15 Report Posted February 15 https://apnews.com/article/new-york-city-attorney-adams-trump-6627665d0dd41e766d6e94598fba11ff Corruption charges against Mayor Eric Adams have been dropped. Mayor Adams brought the wrath of POTUS PJB,'s administration with his response to immigrants showing up in NYC. That's when charges were filed. When POTUS OJ got elected, I figured charges against Mayor Adams would go away. I doubt that Mayor Adams will win re-election in NYC. He might flip from blue to red as well. While Mayor Adams is still in office, he will work with POTUS OJ's administration to round-up undesirable immigrants. After his mayoral term is done, I believe POTUS OJ will give Mayor Adams a posiion in DHS (Department of Homeland Security) or some other agency.
Pioneer1 Posted February 16 Report Posted February 16 ProfD I'm glad you covered this topic because I was thinking about it when I logged on. I think Mayor Adams made an EXCELLENT gangsta move by aligning himself with Trump. The Democrat leadership didn't do shit for him....besides leave him out to dry. If Trump hadn't won and forced the Feds to back up off him...he might have been on his way to prison now. I believe in supporting those who support me. If I'm a Democrat official and my so-called "fellow" Democrats won't have my back and even seek to do me harm and the Republicans slide in, whisper some sweet words in my ears, and help me out of a bind YES I'm going to flip and hop in bed with them! To be clear, I still don't trust EITHER the Democrats or Republicans. But like I said, I believe in supporting those who support me.....whichever party they belong to. If being a flunky for Trump means Adam stays out of jail and even STAYS IN OFFICE (I think that chance is there), then be a flunky! Shit..... But look at how angry some of the Feds were when they were told to leave Adams alone! Several of the prosecutors resigned simply because they were told to drop the charges against Adams!. Think about that! They would rather lose their fucking jobs rather than leave a Black man alone! When strings are pulled to help a White politician and get him out of the hot seat...no problem. They do as they're told and drop the fucking charges and look for another target. But when strings are pulled to help out a Black man....all of a sudden they want to start crying about injustice and resign.
Troy Posted February 16 Report Posted February 16 I just read the article. The charges have not been dropped, at least not yet. The DOJ made the request, but they have not been carried out yet.
ProfD Posted February 16 Author Report Posted February 16 3 minutes ago, Troy said: I just read the article. The charges have not been dropped, at least not yet. The DOJ made the request, but they have not been carried out yet. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2025/02/14/new-york-city-mayor-eric-adams-corruption-charges-dropped/78409879007/ Here is the receipt.
Troy Posted February 16 Report Posted February 16 @ProfD, acknowledged. I guess Eric's co-conspirators have been left holding the bag. Reading the reasons for Eric's indictments seems rather trivial compared to what Trump and Clarence Thomas, for example, are known to have done. How is what the Turkish government has done for Eric different from any K Street Lobbyist does for any member of Congress?
ProfD Posted February 16 Author Report Posted February 16 2 hours ago, Troy said: Reading the reasons for Eric's indictments seems rather trivial compared to what Trump and Clarence Thomas, for example, are known to have done. How is what the Turkish government has done for Eric different from any K Street Lobbyist does for any member of Congress? No difference. Many politicians can be accused of doing the same thing. Mayor Adams was being punished by the Democrats for his stance on immigration. He was too vocal in his displeasure of NYC being a sanctuary city. On cue, Rikers Island has been made available to house deportees.
Pioneer1 Posted February 16 Report Posted February 16 If Trump Musk were wise....Adams wouldn't be offered a position in Trump's Administration or anywhere else in D.C. for his loyalty. If they were wise, they'd keep his Black ass right there in the Big Apple running shit. He knows his way around town and can run their operation better than anybody from OUTSIDE of NYC can.
ProfD Posted February 16 Author Report Posted February 16 17 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said: If Trump Musk were wise....Adams wouldn't be offered a position in Trump's Administration or anywhere else in D.C. for his loyalty. If they were wise, they'd keep his Black ass right there in the Big Apple running shit. He knows his way around town and can run their operation better than anybody from OUTSIDE of NYC can. You're right. Having a Democratic operative running NYC could very well be in the Musky Trump plan.
Pioneer1 Posted February 16 Report Posted February 16 If they Musk has enough pull to get the charges dropped against Adams.....he sure as hell can keep him in the Mayor's seat. That Hochul or whatever her name is who is Governor of New York better watch HER position, instead of fucking with Adams.
ProfD Posted February 17 Author Report Posted February 17 17 hours ago, Pioneer1 said: If they Musk has enough pull to get the charges dropped against Adams.....he sure as hell can keep him in the Mayor's seat. New York uses ranked-choice voting which means Mayor Adams has to compete with a field of candidates. It's not just blue vs red. Yet, anything is possible when it comes to spreading money around. They could pay potentially popular candidates not to run for office. That would leave only Mayor Adams as the post popular choice. However, there is talk that former NY governor Andrew Cuomo is thinking about running for mayor. If he does, it's game over for Mayor Adams.
Pioneer1 Posted February 19 Report Posted February 19 ProfD However, there is talk that former NY governor Andrew Cuomo is thinking about running for mayor. If he does, it's game over for Mayor Adams. Because of how the Democrat leadership in New York went after Andrew and pushed him out of office (like they're trying to do Adams) but over sexual allegation, he may be just a Democrat in name only also. Now if Andrew is a normal "rank-n-file" Democrat who openly tows the party line....I don't think he could be an already in and still popular with the Black (and Latino?) Adams. That's one of the...ONE of the few....good things about being a Black Trump supporter. You get the benefits of Trump having your back AND there's enough Black folks willing to support you simply because yuze' a Black man...lol. Andrew wouldn't get the type of Black and Brown support Adams gets and if Trump backed him the large "liberal" population of New York wouldn't support him either.
ProfD Posted February 19 Author Report Posted February 19 2 hours ago, Pioneer1 said: Andrew wouldn't get the type of Black and Brown support Adams gets and if Trump backed him the large "liberal" population of New York wouldn't support him either. We'll have to wait and see if Mayor Adams has any popularity left. Former governor Andrew Cuomo would go all in as a Democrat. NY seemed to rock with him. It was the allegations that forced him to resign.
Troy Posted February 19 Report Posted February 19 It does not look like Eazy-E is out of the woods yet. New York’s governor is under pressure to give him the boot. And it’s still not clear that he won’t be brought up for charges apparently what he’s accused of is far more serious than just taken some fancy trips from the Turkish government 1
Pioneer1 Posted February 20 Report Posted February 20 I hope he doesn't resign. I hope Trump....Musk...or whoever is running things overthere, lol....continues to back Adams all the way and keep him in the Mayor's seat! I'd love to see the look on the faces of his White enemies and adversaries when they see that he has an even more powerful White team backing him up who can protect him from the bullshit they're throwing at him. -One group of charges dropped -Another group of charges leveled at him...and THEY are dropped -His Mayoral seat is challenged, and he remains in office Man, I would LOVE to see the look on these White folks faces. I've had that happen so many times. On jobs and in organizations, I learned to find out who is the HEAD people in charge...not just the supervisors or the leadership you're working with...but who's RUNNING the operation/organization. When I find out and I smooch and smooze with them and make sure they know who I am and my character, I don't worry about conflict with the little lesser "bosses" because I have the top management on speed dial and call THEM up if I have issues with them.
Troy Posted February 20 Report Posted February 20 Al Sharpton, said Trump could just pardon him, but he won't because they need Eric as Mayor and their leash. He will not resign. The people resigning are not playing one guys said only a coward or a fool would actually drop the charges. Despite the headlines to the contrary the charges have not been officially dropped. Everyone asked to do it has resigned. What a soap opera!
ProfD Posted February 20 Author Report Posted February 20 1 hour ago, Troy said: Despite the headlines to the contrary the charges have not been officially dropped. Correct. The judge hasn't ruled to dismiss charges yet. Also, the charges could be revived at some point in the future. I think the judge is going to sign the order to drop charges. He's already hinted that he has very little room not to sign it. I don't believe DOJ under GOP will bring the charges against Mayor Adams back either. I also think for good measure, before POTUS OJ leaves the White House, he will pardon Mayor Adams from any future prosecution.
Pioneer1 Posted February 21 Report Posted February 21 Troy Al Sharpton, said Trump could just pardon him, but he won't because they need Eric as Mayor and their leash. He will not resign. The people resigning are not playing one guys said only a coward or a fool would actually drop the charge. I think it's foolish for them to resign and lose their jobs simply for not doing what they were told to, even though it doesn't help or hurt them personally one way or the other. Damn..... They really want to go after a Black man don't they! This isn't about "justice" in my opinion because they could have "resigned" over more pressing matters. Some of these people REALLY want to see this Black man prosecuted, which is even more angering. I hope the charges are dropped (as Dr. Umar Johnson would say) FOR GOOOOOD......lol. And I hope he stays in office. Not for Trump's sake, but just to see a Black man survive and thrive in the face of his opposition.
ProfD Posted February 21 Author Report Posted February 21 22 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said: I think it's foolish for them to resign and lose their jobs simply for not doing what they were told to, even though it doesn't help or hurt them personally one way or the other. This isn't the same as quitting the job at a fast food joint in protest of being told to mop the floor and take the trash outside. These people work in a career field where 2 or more jobs are waiting on them. A federal judge or prosecutor can become general counsel to a corporation. Same or higher salary. Zero political pressure. Weep not for them as they will be fine.
Pioneer1 Posted February 21 Report Posted February 21 4 minutes ago, ProfD said: This isn't the same as quitting the job at a fast food joint in protest of being told to mop the floor and take the trash outside. These people work in a career field where 2 or more jobs are waiting on them. A federal judge or prosecutor can become general counsel to a corporation. Same or higher salary. Zero political pressure. Really? I had no idea it was that easy for them to move around like that. I do know in a lot of companies high salaried people bounced around from one position to another and then often found nice cushy jobs in other firms as easily is going out and buying a new television.
ProfD Posted February 21 Author Report Posted February 21 25 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said: Really? I had no idea it was that easy for them to move around like that. Professional career fields offer plenty opportunities for growth, movement and upward mobility. White folks can work anywhere within these 50 states and abroad too.
Troy Posted February 22 Report Posted February 22 Indeed, the fact that they resigned under these conditions will actually make them more marketable for having such a high-level of integrity. I don’t buy into the whole idea that this is just about Eric‘s race. If he had not misbehaved, we wouldn’t be having this discussion.
ProfD Posted February 22 Author Report Posted February 22 2 hours ago, Troy said: I don’t buy into the whole idea that this is just about Eric‘s race. I don't believe charges were brought against Mayor Adams because he's a Black man. The charges were a political hit because Mayor Adams didn't tow the Democratic party line on immigration. If Mayor Adams hadn't spoken out against NYC being a sanctuary city and just cooperated with the program, accepting those campaign contributions as they all do, would have been a non-issue. The current administration is leveraging Mayor Adams' stance on immigration to their own agenda. They'll use him as a tool. The question remains what becomes of Mayor Adams when he's no longer of use to them. Whites supremacists usually break their tools once finished with them.
Pioneer1 Posted February 23 Report Posted February 23 Troy I don’t buy into the whole idea that this is just about Eric‘s race. If he had not misbehaved, we wouldn’t be having this discussion. What did he do that was so wrong, that other mayors BEFORE him didn't do? Did he hurt somebody? Did he do physical harm to somebody or threaten them? What did the man do that makes him SOOOOOO dangerous that they just can't stand to see him being in office and just GOTTA make a point of prosecuting him??? It seems to me like they're engaging in SELECTIVE morality or SELECTIVE enforcement of the law or rules of conduct. You see this over and over again when it comes to the treatment of many Black men, whether you're talking about in the work place or when it comes to the law. They'll let White men get away with some things over and over again and even endear it and make it seem "cute" by saying things like: "Well...that's politics". or "You know, boys will be boys" But as soon as some Black man does it, ALL OF A SUDDEN they start growing halos over their heads and want "justice" to prevail. ProfD The charges were a political hit because Mayor Adams didn't tow the Democratic party line on immigration. Bingo However I think the fact that so many officials who decided to resign RATHER than drop the charges against him did so for racist or racial reasons. The Mayor didn't commit a violent crime or any other violent or sexual act, right? So why were these officials so adamant about prosecuting him? I keep asking.....what did he do that was soooooo wrong that he just MUST be prosecuted and tried and removed? What did the man DO???? Are you telling me that this is the FIRST TIME these people have been asked to drop charges against somebody? Or were they asked to do it for WHITE politicians or people in general and they gladly did it no questions ask, but they want to draw the line with the brutha in office? Come on man... Seriously? What did that man DO that you'd rather lose your job than just leave him alone???? What ever happened to, "Hey....just doing my job" ??? In this case they'd rather QUIT their damn job than do it, huh.
ProfD Posted February 23 Author Report Posted February 23 3 hours ago, Pioneer1 said: I keep asking.....what did he do that was soooooo wrong that he just MUST be prosecuted and tried and removed? What did the man DO???? Mayor Adams p8ssed off the Biden administration. The DOJ brought charges against him. The folks who resigned were p8ssed off that charges were being dropped. Most of them were probably appointed by the Biden administration.
Pioneer1 Posted February 23 Report Posted February 23 ProfD I know. I'm being a bit dramatic when I keep asking what did he do because the shit they're ACCUSING him of....like spending excessive money on trips and charging it to the city...are bullshit accusations that nearly every mayor or governor could be accused of if you chose to go after them. However, more so than the charges being leveled against him, it's how vehement so many people are to see this man's charges stick. Your superiors tell you to drop the charges and you want to see this man locked up or atleast found guilty and removed from office SO bad that you'd rather QUIT your job in protest?
ProfD Posted February 23 Author Report Posted February 23 26 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said: However, more so than the charges being leveled against him, it's how vehement so many people are to see this man's charges stick. Your superiors tell you to drop the charges and you want to see this man locked up or atleast found guilty and removed from office SO bad that you'd rather QUIT your job in protest? I don't believe the prosecutors want to see Mayor Adams locked up in so much as their *work* is being dismissed. Rest assured that this is performative. As I mentioned, those folks can go across the street and land another job.
Pioneer1 Posted February 23 Report Posted February 23 I'm wondering where does the state Attorney General Miss Leticia James fit into all of this? If the state government supersedes the city government, it seems that SHE could step in and straighten this shit out....IF she were on Adams' side.
ProfD Posted February 24 Author Report Posted February 24 Mayor Adams case is federal. Above the jurisprudence of the state. NY AG can't do anything.
Croocked T Posted April 23 Report Posted April 23 It’s interesting how corruption charges just disappear with a change in administration. That’s why protecting whistleblowers is so important – they’re among the few who can bring hidden issues to light. But from what I’ve read here, they can actually get legal protection from specialized attorneys, and that makes a big difference. 1
Pioneer1 Posted April 23 Report Posted April 23 I'm no fan of Trump's but I'm glad he made the charges go away. Or HELPED make them go away in whatever capacity he was involved. Why? Because it serves as a lesson for other Black people and especially Black politicians that if you're GOING to align yourself with White people, do it with the White people who actually will help you and have your back. Don't just be loyal to a name or party, but align yourself with whoever is serving YOUR best interests and the best interests of your people. ....and in the case of Trump. Even if it's not in the best interests of your people, if it's in YOUR best interests atleast.
Troy Posted April 24 Report Posted April 24 What Little I knew of the charges against Eric Adams seemed a bit much. I think what you’re missing is the fact that the charges leveled against him were unwarranted in other words he was set up and the only way he could get out of. It was to do Trump’s bidding. The whole thing was a sham. In any event, Adams wasn’t the best candidate and he’ll likely lose, he had a good run. He should be proud of all he’s accomplished.
ProfD Posted April 24 Author Report Posted April 24 12 hours ago, Pioneer1 said: Because it serves as a lesson for other Black people and especially Black politicians that if you're GOING to align yourself with White people, do it with the White people who actually will help you and have your back. Don't just be loyal to a name or party, but align yourself with whoever is serving YOUR best interests and the best interests of your people. ....and in the case of Trump. Even if it's not in the best interests of your people, if it's in YOUR best interests atleast. There's no such thing as a free lunch especially for a man. A man has to be willing to pay the price for and/or suffer the consequences that his benefactor(s) put on him That's why it's extremely important for a man to never be a dependent. He should make others depend on him. Otherwise, he's powerless.
Troy Posted April 24 Report Posted April 24 10 hours ago, ProfD said: That's why it's extremely important for a man to never be a dependent. He should make others depend on him. Otherwise, he's powerless. Wisdom.
Pioneer1 Posted April 24 Report Posted April 24 There's no such think as an "independent" politician. If you become a political figure you're GOING to be beholden to and dependent on somebody....even if it's just those who voted you in. Unless you're in an executive position (like Trump and his "executive orders"), your only power comes from your influence over the people and your ability to sway them.
ProfD Posted April 24 Author Report Posted April 24 18 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said: There's no such think as an "independent" politician. If you become a political figure you're GOING to be beholden to and dependent on somebody....even if it's just those who voted you in. Right. Politicians have to gain trust and confidence of constituents for whom they work supposedly. 18 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said: Unless you're in an executive position (like Trump and his "executive orders"), your only power comes from your influence over the people and your ability to sway them. Sure. Once politicians are voted into executive positions they have a limited amount of power. I was referring to men in general as it relates to being independent in life. Nobody really respects a man who isn't self-sufficient. Men who are capable of taking care of themselves, their women, children, family and friends, etc., are respected and powerful.
Pioneer1 Posted April 26 Report Posted April 26 ProfD Men who are capable of taking care of themselves, their women, children, family and friends, etc., are respected and powerful I agree. How many.....or what percentage....of men today, would you say actually fit that description?
ProfD Posted April 26 Author Report Posted April 26 2 hours ago, Pioneer1 said: ProfD Men who are capable of taking care of themselves, their women, children, family and friends, etc., are respected and powerful I agree. How many.....or what percentage....men today, would you say actually fit that description? The answer ties back to statistics. The reality is the percentage of men who fit the description doesn't matter. The definition remains unchanged. There are plenty of men who are holding it down in that regard.
Pioneer1 Posted April 26 Report Posted April 26 38 minutes ago, ProfD said: The answer ties back to statistics. The reality is the percentage of men who fit the description doesn't matter. The definition remains unchanged. Lol....I don't know of any "statistic" that's going to give you an accurate figure of how many men are "holding it down" for several reasons. However as far as your belief that percentage of men actually doing this not mattering.... Let me ask you? Do you think that a man SHOULD be doing this by nature, or that by nature men were INTENDED to take care of and protect themselves, their women, and children???
ProfD Posted April 26 Author Report Posted April 26 11 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said: Let me ask you? Do you think that a man SHOULD be doing this by nature, or that by nature men were INTENDED to take care of and protect themselves, their women, and children??? IMO, by nature men are designed and intended to protect and provide for their survival and that includes their families too. Of course, for several reasons there have always been and will always be men who are incapable and/or have zero desire to fulfill their natural role.
Pioneer1 Posted April 26 Report Posted April 26 4 minutes ago, ProfD said: IMO, by nature men are designed and intended to protect and provide for their survival and that includes their families too. I agree.... Which is why I take issue with your belief that the percentage of men actually doing this doesn't matter. It matters because if a majority or just half of the men in a society are found not being able to live according to their nature and assume their responsibilities AS men. That bespeaks of a problem IN that society, and it needs to be addressed. In other words...... If you study the next generation and discover that half of the boys are growing up to be homosexuals when you KNOW that's not the nature of most males....that should tell you there's a problem going on an investigation needs to be launched to figure out why.
ProfD Posted April 26 Author Report Posted April 26 1 hour ago, Pioneer1 said: I agree.... Which is why I take issue with your belief that the percentage of men actually doing this doesn't matter. It matters because if a majority or just half of the men in a society are found not being able to live according to their nature and assume their responsibilities AS men. That bespeaks of a problem IN that society, and it needs to be addressed. The percentage of alpha-males doesn't have to be 50% or higher. Like the military, a few hundred thousand soldiers can protect and serve 335 million people. POTUS OJ takes of a couple hundred people including his wife, offspring, grandchildren and friends. Same goes for any multimillionaire on down to the man who can support himself, wife, mistresses, baby mommas and kids, etc. 1 hour ago, Pioneer1 said: In other words...... If you study the next generation and discover that half of the boys are growing up to be homosexuals when you KNOW that's not the nature of most males....that should tell you there's a problem going on an investigation needs to be launched to figure out why. I don't believe 50% of males in the next generation will belong to the alphabet community. Due to the war on masculinity, the media tries to downplay alpha-males holding it down. Through clenched teeth some media folks give POTUS OJ as much press as they do because his out-sized personality demands it. POTUS OJ is the personification of an alpha-male. There's a legion of white men quietly applauding him for being one.
Pioneer1 Posted April 26 Report Posted April 26 Ok..... I don't believe the MAJORITY or even HALF of all men were meant to be alpha males. I believe less than 20% were. Don't ask me where i got that figure....lol. But certainly less than a quarter.
ProfD Posted April 26 Author Report Posted April 26 1 hour ago, Pioneer1 said: Ok..... I don't believe the MAJORITY or even HALF of all men were meant to be alpha males. I believe less than 20% were. Don't ask me where i got that figure....lol. But certainly less than a quarter. It is one of those stats where the 20/80 rule most likely applies.
Pioneer1 Posted April 26 Report Posted April 26 That ratio sounds about right. Like I've said for years, MOST men aren't meant to be alphas. You hear this world "beta male" being thrown around like an insult. Like calling them gay or something. Jesse Lee Peterson is notorious for calling men "beta males"....lol. "Beta male! See....the only reason you would make a statement like that is because you a beta male and ya mama didn't raise you right." But I think MOST men are beta and gamma and a large portion are probably sigma too. Only a percentage are actually alphas based on my observation. Which makes sense because EVERYBODY can't be top dog or the leader. In any organization you have to have more followers than leaders for it to work, or else it would collapse from being too top heavy.
Troy Posted April 27 Report Posted April 27 On 4/26/2025 at 11:06 AM, ProfD said: IMO, by nature men are designed and intended to protect and provide for their survival and that includes their families too. I completely disagree. sure there are some men are like this, and there are many other men who are by nature meant to be artists or griots or nurturers. the proof of this is the number of men who don’t fit the role described. It is simply impossible for every male to be an alpha male if that were truly term would be unnecessary man by nature, alpha, beta, gamma, Delta and the rest of the alphabet. When I was in Tanzania, I met people of the Masai. There were classic Warriors who why the hair braided braid (the way girls do hear ) There will also men with shaved heads who played a different role. I wanna say education, but I don’t remember because I was more curious about the Warriors who had to kill a lion to prove their ability to kill a warrior at any rate, that description of manhood is a Western construct and unnecessarily limiting in what manhood should be.
ProfD Posted April 28 Author Report Posted April 28 8 hours ago, Troy said: It is simply impossible for every male to be an alpha male if that were truly term would be unnecessary man by nature, alpha, beta, gamma, Delta and the rest of the alphabet. Of course not every male can be an alpha which is why the alphabet exists.
Troy Posted April 28 Report Posted April 28 The reason I pushed back is because the implication is that if you are not the alpha male you are less than a man. This is illustrated by Peterson's quote;" "Beta male! See....the only reason you would make a statement like that is because you a beta male and ya mama didn't raise you right;" With this mentality combined with the ready availability of guns you have young boys believing they are Alphas ("real" men), because they can easily take a life by shooting someone. Same with impregnating women...
ProfD Posted April 28 Author Report Posted April 28 9 minutes ago, Troy said: The reason I pushed back is because the implication is that if you are not the alpha male you are less than a man. This is illustrated by Peterson's quote;" "Beta male! See....the only reason you would make a statement like that is because you a beta male and ya mama didn't raise you right;" Understood. Not being an alpha definitely does not strip away manhood. 9 minutes ago, Troy said: With this mentality combined with the ready availability of guns you have young boys believing they are Alphas ("real" men), because they can easily take a life by shooting someone. Same with impregnating women... Those types of dudes quickly find out they are not alphas when they end up in the penitentiary or child support court.
umbrarchist Posted April 28 Report Posted April 28 Birds of Corruption flock together. I am still entertained by what the haoles are going to do with Trump. The military obviously doesn't have its act together as much as I hoped it might. Milley told everybody Trump was a fascist 4 years ago. But Hegseth is making a mess in the Pentagon so how pissed are they at Trump. If Trump falls what happens to all of the dominoes? .
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now