Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
harry brown

SHOULD THE U.S. ATTACK SYRIA/

Recommended Posts

SHOULD  THE  U.S.  ATTACK  SYRIA/SYRIA  GOVERNMENT  KILLING  THEIR   PEOPLE  WITH  CHEMICAL  WEAPONS//IT  WAS  NOT  SYRIA  OR  IRAN  THAT  SENT   RICIN  TO  PRESIDENT  OBAMA   .IT  WAS  SOME  WHITE  PEOPLE   IN  THIS  COUNTRY     PROBALY  KLAN   MEMBERS...RICIN   IS  DEADLY   LIKE  ANTHRAX,  KLAN  GROUPS  HAVE  BEEN  CAUGHT   WITH   BOTH//ATTACK SYRIA    THAT  MIGHT  GET  AL  QUEDA   MORE  INVOLVED,  MORE  DEAD  U.S.  TROOPS ///THIS  COUNTRY    GOVERNMENT  IS  AMAZING,  THE  U.S.   DONT  WANT  TERRORIST  IN  OTHER   COUNTRY    GOVERNMENTS,  THIS  COUNTRY  HAS    KLAN  MEMBERS   IN  THE   GOVERNMENT///AM  I  THE  ONLY  ONE  WHO  THINKS  SOUTH  CAROLINA   REPUBLICAN LINDSEY  GRAHAM  IS  A   KLAN  MEMBER.//

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another reason to bring back the draft.  If there was a chance some rich kids could be in combat perhaps these guys would think twice. 

 

Then again the rich would find a way to get their kids exemptions...

 

This is no win.  We are going into another war.  Obama checking in with Congress will help deflect some blame from him. But lets be clear: we will engage Syria. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't believe how President Obama has morphed into a bellicose Alpha Male, going from benign Nobel Peace Prize winner to an agressive saber rattler.  His position on this Syria situation seems implicitly influenced by a need to remind that America is the most powerful country in the world and that, as its leader, he has the balls of a HNIC.   

 

All this subtefuge about poison gas and moral obigation rings hollow.  What's the difference between killing innocent people with drones and machine gun fire as opposed to poison gas. One method is just as deadly as the other. In the end, the victims are just as dead. And the claims about chemcial warfare just as trumped-up as those about weapons of mass destruction were.

 

Too blinded by his hubris, Obama's  urgency to save his presidential legacy will backfire.  He seems oblivious to the possibility of Syria ignoring his warnings.  What will he do if things escalate??? What is his end game?  The rats are all deserting the sinking ship as Obama stands at the helm, his erection drooping, visions of a smirking George Bush, haunting his resolve. England occupies itself with a new crown prince, while China checks its ledgers to make sure the U.S. has paid its latest loan installment, and Russia sips vodka while taking sides with Syria.

 

The buck stops with a woegotten President Barak Obama, who should've been careful about what he wished for; because he got it.  The audacity of hope, indeed.   Watta farce.

 

Back on the home front, the anti-war movement is stirring back to life and I'm ready to flash the peace sign.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My guess Kerry's slip is no slip. War has to be paid for, what resource does Syria possess.

Cynique The President is The Alpha Male. Remember when he was collecting the Nobel Prize and joking about sending troops to war. He is very very clever.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...