Economic Corner 40 05/16/2026

Profd made the following post

https://aalbc.com/tc/topic/12748-made-in-china-why-is-it-considered-usa-adversary/

And it's primary plus elemental position is the USA + China are in a financial synergy that disallows the concept that china is a threat. BUT, said synergy has two problems.

First the true relationship of the usa side china isn't financial but militaristic.

Second, the generator of the stated financial synergy is not the usa.

Nuclear Powered Countries and money

The reason the Nuclear powers: USA/Russia/China/ England/France made the Non proliferation treaty wasn't for peace but control. Non proliferation isn't about saving humanity, it is about allowing a set of countries, the exclusive nuclear powers set to be in a class beyond themselves. This is why, Russia or China who continuously are deemed similar to Iran/North Korea/Cuba/Libya under Quadaffi or others are never treated like them. The reason is, the iran's of the world don't have nuclear weapons.

Notice the USA has never invaded Russia. why? Russia has a huge nuclear weapons arsenal. For all the rhetoric about Putin or Russian crimes the USA and France through the European Union will never advocate a confrontation into russia because no one can guarantee the nuclear weapons will not fly and the damage from a nuclear war will derail all fiscal activity.

But having said that the nuclear powers have never been allies. They are at war all the time.

The only time the usa will not see China as a threat is when China doesn't have nuclear weapons while the only time China will not see the usa as a threat is when the usa doesn't have nuclear weapons.

Nuclear war is superior to money/global trade system. Most countries can't do it and the usa is trying hard to limit the numbers who come in.

But USA/Russia/China/England/ France/ISrael/Pakistan/ India are all enemies, they simply have an arrangement because they are in the rarest class of modern governments, nuclear powers , thus must be treated unlike the cuba's , kosovo's, others who absent nuclear power, simply don't have the weapons to truly threaten the world.

Who is the WE in the USA?

The post from PRofd has an initial statement. "China has been the blue-collar labor force for the United States of America (USA) for several decades now."

The USA is reaching 250 years soon. I have never denied I don't care for the usa, even as a boy. But, the one thing I have never seen in the usa is honesty, truth.

The usa , not merely its wealthy or powerful or its government levels, but the common farmers, homeless urban dwellers, and most others have one disease that sickens me. It is the disease of unstraight lies.

The very declaration of independence sto the united states of america starts with an unstraight lie. "We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal"

The following is an unstraight lie "We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal"

The person who wrote that is a white european enslaving incestual rapist, but beyond his identity, the unstraight lies are ever present.

1. "We"

   1. who was we? who is we? When the writer f the line was composing his words, was he speaking about native americans, being massacred? he was speaking about black people of african descent who are enslaved or their descendants? Do all humans know all humans are human? yes. But does that suggest all humans can be spoken for? the answer is never. You can never speak for all humans and thus the unstraight lie.

2. "All men are created equal"

   1. the tragedy in this is, the writer was being honest, he was speaking of men, not women, but he is unstraight, he wasn't speaking of all men he was speaking of white european men. But moreover, when anyone suggest that all men created eqaul suggest all humans are created equal , that is another unstraight lie. The two phrases don't connect. All men created equal means just that, not women . All humans are created equal means just that. BUt are all humans created equal? no. Anyone who has seen a child with cerebral palsy struggle knows, all humans are not created equal. Are all humans human? yes, but they are not all created equal.

Like the one who wrote the phrase "We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal" , Profd in true Statian/ of the USA tradition or heritage, has created an unstraight lie. The USA has a legal structure which suggest all in the usa are united in responsibility to the actions of the usa, The suggestion has never been true. Again, who is we? did black towns in the south want chinese blue collar labor, started, in the 1970s when they were fighting to get labor from the same white owned businesses that fled to china and its cheaper labor? no. Did Native American reservations want chinese blue collar labor , started, in the 1970s when they were fighting to get the legal right to start businesses on reservation land which many still don't have? no. Did fiscal poor white towns in the appalachias want chinese blue collar labor, started in the 1970s, when they were fighting to get keep their land from state governments who were using all sorts of techniques to take their land for natural resources or other projects? no.

So who wanted chinese blue collar labor to have the position it does int he usa? fiscally wealthy whites. They started in the 1960s to deire this fiscal change to get cheaper labor supported by many, not all or most, whites who didn't want black people to have any happiness. What a majority of whites wanted in the 1960s was for business to maintain investment in white towns/communities in the usa and blockade the non white in the usa. What a majority of blacks wanted in the 1960s was for business to expand their opportunities to blacks while keeping activities completely in the usa. What a majority of native americans wanted in the 1960s was the right to start business and have native american controlled financial zones in the reservations that could do business with the business in the usa beyond the reservations. Instead white owned fiscal corporations moved 99% of blue collar jobs outside the usa altogether, deleting the desires or plans of most native americans most blacks plus most fiscally poor whites. But in parallel said white fiscal corporations created the modern labored and blue collar populaces around the world outside the usa. The government liked it, because it was like a payment for adhering to the governmental order of the usa. But the price is today.

Everyone in the usa knows what i said is true, but too many in the usa want to suggest unstraight lies.

The smallest populace in the usa, the mega rich chose to manipulate the labor environment in the usa to cut all the blue collar jobs out and place them overseas. but the 99% didn't want that and even after decades, the 99% still want those jobs back or have become so resentful that they simply dislike the foreigner.

Profd argument to the future is instead of complaining about what happened in the past against your favor or want, focus on trying to make the system , that you didn't design and is designed against you, work better for you, however you can. The idea is adjustment while bitter over resentment. while hateful. The element that dictates the polarity is patience. The 1% in the usa can wait for change or ride out changes, whether they want them or not, , they have the money or resources. The 99% don't have the resources to ride out or wait for changes. Which means for the 99% to wait for change they have to embrace a truth, the change may never come no matter what they do, even working for it every day. This is a test of patience and I argue, after two hundred and fifty, 250, years many, and arguably a majority ,definitely a majority of Black descended of enslaved , have no patience to adjust in cycles till finding comfort.

IN AMENDMENT

How can patience be increased in any person or group... by being earned. If a person goes outside their home one day and a person hits them in the face, they may have patience and come out again the next day. But if a person keeps getting punched in the face every day they come out for three hundred and sixty five days no matter how hard they try to dunk or punch or talk or fight back or any strategy, sooner or later, they will simply stay in the house. Their patience is dried up. In two hundred and fifty years the usa has never had one place in it, not one city or town where native americans were powerful, adored, loved, strong, able to protect themselves no matter what, in control. not one city or town where Blacks were powerful, adored, loved, strong, able to protect themselves no matter what, in control.... yes, some people native americans/blacks/whites/females/ males or other have shown the ability to be patient throughout their life with the usa. But, most will never be able to do that, we are not created equally, we humans are not all the same.

POST URL

I will post in the commentary to profd's post

https://aalbc.com/tc/topic/12748-made-in-china-why-is-it-considered-usa-adversary/#findComment-81550

PRIOR EDITION

https://aalbc.com/tc/events/event/682-economic-corner-39-03242026/

NEXT EDITION

?

COMMENTARY

05162026

https://aalbc.com/tc/topic/12748-made-in-china-why-is-it-considered-usa-adversary/#findComment-81550

It seems to me what your suggesting needs to happen in the future is for people ,more people, the ninety nine percent 99%, the majority in the united states of america u.s.a., to embrace adjusting more positively to the fiscal environment or governmental bureaucracies of the u.s.a. led by the u.s.a.'s one percent fiscal wealthy, even if they didn't want them, were unable to stop them being implemented, are suffering under them, or some negative.

I can say many people, various phenotypes/genders/religions/ages/ in various geographies in the usa have stated similar to you. There is a movement of people in the usa who stand with you. Is it a majority? I don't know, and I gamble no.

In the two hundred and fifty year history of the united states of america, i argue a majority in the populace across all racial types [phenotype/gender /religion or others] have been impatient or unsatisfied with the system. But, the minority in this country has always found a way with its resources to stop the impatient majority from jumping to violence to anarchy/a system absent any ruler whether be the law or an individual. Said minority which today includes women plus blacks plus latinos has gotten the majority to embrace stillness, do nothing which isn't patience it is a calm before a storm, in which every time the calm is extended the storm gets bigger. Two hundred and fifty year is a long extension.

I end with positive... some say strong people lead themselves. I argue a peoples goals dictate their actions. Complacency isn't equivalent to weakness, complacency can occur when one is actually happy with the way things are, not merely being coerced into activity by others. The problem with the populaces that make up the majority in the usa is they need to be convinced that engagement will lead to results each populace wants, something that has never happened in the usa. To restate the usa has never had a time in its history where native americans/blacks/whites/ latinos/women men/old/young/immigrants/orphans/prisoners/ or others got what they wanted. Either few win or all lose is what happens in the usa. So the only way for that to be undone is an era of leadership . The usa had a great era of multiracial leadership in the 1960s that was assassinated/poisoned/imprisoned/similar injury by a combination of fiscal plus governmental agents who had something to lose if all groups won. But if a a great era of multiracial leadership can happen once, it can happen again.

But, one must have patience.

https://aalbc.com/tc/events/event/735-economic-corner-40-05162026/