Well
A loser is a loser. An "incarcerated or financially broke" young brother isn't a winner. Victims of society are losers even if this isn't entirely of their own making. You become a winner when you find or are provided a way to successfully overcome your negative circumstances and go on to survive or even thrive. "Loser" can be interchangeable with being "unlucky". All losers are not people of bad character, just like all winners are not ones of good character. Whatever the case, Life doesn't give a damn because it holds no obligation to be fair. Society reflects life. (BTW, the Chicago Cubs baseball team was nicknamed the "Lovable Losers" because for 100 years a pennant eluded them. Then they underwent a remarkable transformation and became an extraordinary team, going on to win the World Series, and become acclaimed winners!)
Certainly you don't think this is an original idea. It's a grandiose suggestion that never gets beyond the talking stage because people with foresight understand how the logistics of it would prevent its implementation. However, for years righteous black men in the form of community and church leaders, entertainers and athletes who give back to the "hood", even law enforcement groups have all embodied microcosms of this dynamic via of regular demonstrations and marches and wholesome social activities and mentoring programs. It's so common that it doesn't make the news. Also, "each one, teach one" has been the motto of many individual activists. All the bad that goes on in the inner cities is what is publicized because it's sensational. One problematic factor which has become a part of the underclass culture is the irresponsible breeding of children. Men like you who celebrate promiscuity and wallow in their testosterone can share the blame for this. And until birth control becomes popular in the ghettos, there will always be neglected kids who grow up to be losers.