frankster

Homo Erectus is African being that Its Origin is on the Continent.... Homo Erectus is the Immediate Ancestor of Neanderthal..... Are You saying that Africans Only have Nappy hair? It is the same gene that is responsible for straight or wavy or nappy hair cool Does this Offspring of Eve and the Serpent have a Name? cool THis reads like some form of Dispensationalism....I do not think it is wrong or bad just it seems to me it has no rules direction or clear lines of demarcation. It can be too easily used prejudicially to support any or anyones personal agenda or political opinions.....like reading tea leaves or Scrying. While I think the bible is about Eternal Spiritual Truths....Not about Geo-politics but about you the individual

Evidence is an indication of what happened or is happening.....from which inferences can be made Not if they have evidence... One can not be every where and every when.... If you see prints in Sand or dirt...one can tell much of what transpired and often how long ago and what made it That depends on how much evidence is left and the state of your technology and knowledge. It is not the same...that is true. As no two experiences are the same...even in sex but for some it is enough or even better....in any case inferences can be deduced. Again it depends on your expertise and available technology No You can only be sure of what you now know....not what you may know in the future True Truth is truth no matter who or where it comes from Thru Genetic science I do not know if they do or not.... Yes cool We splitting hairs here... One must first agree....then participate Yes....we still live in a North American culture.. and there is no racism in most of so called subsaharan Africa like unto Europe. It is limited to Time and Place.....Change a Universal Constant Race is not a biological or genetic reality. Race is a social reality When you fight....you not in the game - you are in resistance. As long as you are in the state of fleeing....then you are not in the game - Many have successfully done so.... Non violent resistance....does change the game Good.....you did not submit to the rules of the game - you are now a threat to the game They are a threat, in resistance and remain independent.....they remain an inspiration. They want to be in the game....prep trained selected willing able and ready.

True.. I asked for evidence but if you have proof then present it.. Yes....I experienced reading the information Genetic memory That maybe true... We are forced to accept the truth we know now and act from there......not the truth we may know in the future from which we cannot act They came to their own conclusion reluctantly....that they were descended from Africans. Yes and No Reality is Realities There are many Realities and many levels to each Reality There is more to Reality than we both think or will ever knowYes There is Your Reality and Shared Reality.....Shared Reality is agreed upon. Not entirely true....its the same culture and geography It does need to be qualified....for its existence is dependent on society and its institutions There is a difference between physical reality and social reality.... Its not food for argument..... Can you taste social reality? ......you can easily taste physical reality? - so there is a qualitative difference Yes I see an infinite options You could fight? flee? play the game but by your own rules? just not cooperate?....etc Ask the Haitians and the thousands of Maroons settlements that existed.....Palenques and Quilombos Thousands escaped... You not in the game....they trying to get you to play Not true Many have exited without using death

Present the evidence? If memory serves....the earliest people of the americas are the so-called Clovis people then the found luzia - turns out she was African. Though some now argue that she was Australopithecus Even the Chinese spent millions of $$$$ to prove that they were not descendants of Africans. Yes... Not all realities enduring and exist independent of and stand on it own....some realities are dependent limited transient manmade constructions. Racism today is not the same as racism of yesteryears Socially realities only exist within societies....as soon as those social structures are no longer supported- they fade Physically realities exist independent of society....within without before after and during. Yes No You have free will... You can refuse to play... or refuse to play by the rules of the game True I do not think he shouldn't....We live in a racist society and that is how people are described. I Accept race as a Social Construct....and I know I live in a racist society - As such I know the Laws and Rules that are applicable

According to what I know all hominids hominins homo and human have one common ancestor who originated in Africa.... As they travel around the globe over many years of mutation they develop variation and diverged that resulted in speciation... Neanderthal are I think the are descendants of Homo Erectus....Homo Erectus is out of Africa.... Human beings that share the same contemporaneous time period will and do intermix. Tell me why the Serpent is a human? The whole ideology of Races was invent and propagated by racist and racism.. So far all arguments to support its existence or reality scientifically biological or genetically has been disproven I do not question its Authenticity as a Social Convention or Construct.....As it effects are very real in societies were it is accepted and enforced Explain....as I see thy head and his heel again explain?

cool cool We Know.....every scientific school of thought we have that has a bearing on this issue comes back supporting African and Africans being the source of all Human beings By using.......The Scientific Method Same way a geologist knows what's under the ground without being under ground...thru Study Observation Science and Technology Back engineering....Reverse Genetics Racism Race and Races only has reality in a social setting where it is accepted as true and enforce it by law and practice Same as how only in a game of monopoly do you get $200 for passing Go...because the players accept it as true and enforce it by rule and play.

Yes...you can Well as you should They have an agenda....that is not advertise - One can only wonder what they want with all those DNA?? No they are not....but land and geography do influence genes - those influences are then passed on Poor choice as an example Professional Sommeliers or Wine Connoisseur can and do....as it is part of how they make their living. Yes....so it seems seems reasonable... It comes down to where you wish to stop.....but we know the source is African True But each geographic location leaves its mark on the gene (a mutation of sorts)....that mark can be thought of as the start of a new ethnicity. So you may be able to or can tell where and when the mutation/variation first appeared. Yes...Race as a social construct is a convention....where in varies attributes are agreed upon as it constituents. just as one can predicated a whole new race on individuals who have red hair or eleven fingers The same Genes are responsible for all the Variations....These Genes are common to and shared among human beings. You haven't provide enough information....for me to be sure

Where Humanity is Cream Then Flavor is like unto ethnicity Isn't that one of the advertised purpose of those genealogy companies to ascertain where you ancestors originate....like Ancestor.com and 23andme. Current understanding among the lay public is that they can..... My personally opinion is that is not exactly what they do or are doing They are aggregating current DNA as to where they are most abundant in the so-called old world..... It has little bearing on where your ancestors originated from but more on where your DNA co hurts are now..... When you combine Migration patterns History Anthropology Archeology and Genealogy....then you can make a very accurate guess as to where your ancestors are from Yes That maybe so....but Race has no basis in genetics. Xenophobia and Tribalism are both Socio-political ideological system based in fear hate and loyalty No two human beings are (exactly) the same Difference tend to be mostly Natural Divisions tend to be mostly Artificial cool That's Culture That's Heritage Just another of many differences among peoples....no two individuals or peoples are the same - some are better some things while others are better at other things They both have a different history and relationship with the particular Land....that must be weight - and negotiated.

Yes....One human Race Genetically... Yes...and the cause in one word epigenetic Yes.... Genes can be traced back....Y-chromosome DNA and Mitochondrial DNA - passed on by Father and Mother respectively. Humans are divided social politically geographically...these division were and are human doings. The now current devision is about Power and Resource by various factions of humanity. Yes... Humans Race and racism is a socio-political ideology predicated on ethnic differences.. So is Sexism a socio-political ideology predicated on sexual differences.. Sex and ethnicity exist outside of isms. cool All human beings are more similar to other humans beings than too any other existing living beings.....hence the Human race It was malice and greed The social-political ideology of race races and racism was created to facilitate social power hierarchy exploitation and persecution. By constructing and enforcing an artificial divisions they can have a in group(included) and an out group(other, excluded). Associating with and categorizing yourself as belong to is two different thing Associating deals with relationship context and proximity Categorizing deals with shared qualities or similar characteristics for classification We do not pick our family members...we have little choice in the matter We do often pick our friends....we have more of a choice in the matter No.....not by Nature But as a result of Enforced Social Engineering and Political Manipulation. The first human beings came from Africa No....they should not take. That must be negotiate with your current relatives occupying the land. I do not see where white South Africans are being persecuted in mass or as a whole. That may very well have been the case as it often was and is You cannot go to your great great great great great grand parents home or land and see you cousins 20times remove living there, their direct ancestors having never left and demand or take a room or plot of land without due diligence or respect and not expect to cause acrimony and or worst My Mother's uncle threatened his brother over land and properties their father bequeath to them both as beneficiaries....only because he left for twenty yrs

We are all of the African (human)Race.... Within Africa there are over 2000 ethnicities The white South Africans are not Africans - "NOW".......they have always been Africans by descent They are not Africans because they were now born and bred on the continent of Africa.....but because they are descendants of Africans White South Africans might well be the starting of yet another new ethnicity on the continent......Afrikaans/Boer???

It is the same set of gene that is responsible for all phenotypic variation....the differences arise from how they are express and to what degree from on or off True It is also back up by genetics. Humans. Yes.... we have been divide Yes....they are exploiting this division The ideology of Races and Racism is a way of maintaining this division True....that is a result of historical racism All peoples come from black African people. No... One should accept that we are all of the human race but ethnically diverse. We concur Yes...a purposely flawed misapplication to facilitate persecution of the weak Exactly No....that is not entirely true People primarily come together around shared interests and values....age sex and color are culturally inculcated There is Adaptation and Maladaptation.... Some ideas are destructive whilst others are constructive Then by this definition the White South Africans are now Africans?? I disagree.. Biologically Africa is the proverbial Garden of Eden making Africans Adam and Eve...so humans are all Africans I would accept this...if we are trying to delineate ethnicity

If by blood you are referencing biology. So long as they remain human they are African...All humans are African cool They not only trying to label us.....but divide us Every body has black (as in African) Ancestry... Now when it comes to ethnicity and along the lines on which the differ phenotypically Politically society can stratify socially and hierarchically alone these lines of demarcation Only when one accepts the idea of Race and Races socially. This is a direct result of Racial prejudiced being socialized taught and enforced. When one looks beyond phenotype....it is truth Phenotype denotes heritage travel history diet culture and geography.....not humanity The confusion stems from ignorance and wickedness in the pursuit of privilege power and wealth at the expense of the weak. I have read what you post....and came to that conclusion Never said that you did not do so..... I said Your emphasis is on complexion as in Skin Color...which is as the architects of Racism would have it and want it You have been schooled by racist ideology to define people along these lines It contextualize their relevant social position in society Many do pass for White.... Many a racist do accept them as white until they realize their ancestry.... Not sure what you intend for that to mean... Cool To reflect back your first query.... Then the question is at what point does the squatters become Africans?

Africans come in various forms.. The Racial Caste System is rooted in the idea of fomenting Intra-Racial Discrimination and seeming Privilege. In order to whiten African descendants and provide Rich white men with legal extra marital sex partners(placage) In a Social Pigmentocracy Black American and AfroAmericans are the same.....unmixed African - so to speak....as in white or caucasian Mixed African depending on how much European features they exhibit were called octoroons quadroons mulatoo etc The Racial Caste system led to the development in the African community of discrimination based on skin tone shade or complexion - as in colorism shadeism and featureism Your emphasis is on complexion....as the main if not the only deciding factor. While you are using Black to denote Skin Tone and or Complexion To me Black as in people usually refers to.....Descendants of EnSlaved Africans in the West While Afro Which really references an Hair texture that is Natural or common to people of African descent or mixture. Both terms are in a sense appropriate I prefer to called descendants of Western enslaved Africans Black and all others Afro-Americans or add their nationalities as a suffix Here is where problem can arise. Africans who lived here in West and are not descendants of slaves but came direct from Africa as free persons and remained are then called what? What are White persons born and bred on the African continent for generations then called?

True.... But they are subject to US Foreign Policy... True....but women are sometimes so mercurial. True What it should be and what it is....in fact is two totally different thing It is only illegal when you have been successfully prosecuted. That has always been the case....in away.

Yes that is as it should be.....but in real world practice it is not so cut and dry Laws Stem from Policies...In other words Policies formulate Laws.. Policies are piable so long as the goal that it intends to meet is still being met... Laws are more stringent.....hence the relatively high bar to prove they have been broken The Government usually is either made of of business interest or serve their puropses I have no argument with that.... Was the Vietnam war Officially Approved By Congress? They used semantics of Police Action or Armed Conflict.....its all Polytricks True.... This is usually because their are factions in Governement with Greater agendas at play fair e Cool Aren't we all physically limited to some extent in some ways? What if Mom says....otherwise? Which is the case with the fed and state over cannabis....as you mentioned. True... True When it comes to games.....the cardinal rule is to - Win True....

Nell Irvin Painter: The History of White People "The Invention Of The White Race" by Theodore W. Allen. Presentation by Jeffrey B. Perry

Nell Irvin Painter: The History of White People

Yes.... Doctrine is about what to believe or how to think......in a given situation Policy is about what actions are permissible to take....in a given situation What it usually mean is there is not enough evidence to prosecute....hence it does not rise to the level of beyond a reasonable doubt as to its criminality or unconstitutionality. Politics is a dirty unfair game.... Some are allowed to flaunt the rules.....while others are penalize for it. God is Law.... Free Will is also a BirthRight Give to Man God has Commandments and Man breaks them all easily.... To die usually you must first have Lived. Can the Will of Man be Imprisoned? Yes...that is true. Isn't there a division of responsible and limits on how much the Federal Government can interfere in the internal affairs of a State on certain issues? True....

Monroe Doctrine and Roosevelt Corollary are US Foreign Policy actions taken by the President that falls under their purview are neither illegal or unconstitutional. If the Senate and or Congress and or the Attorney General does not see it fit to bring impeachment Charges against The President... Then it would appear as if it does not raise to the level of a prosecutorial offense.....not criminal True.... I agree. The Constitution and all Laws are only as strong as those who enforce and interpret them True We living in a Barbarization.....not a Civilization All barbarian social systems are gilded Death Cults. True The President can now interpret that Law to suit his ends.......enforce apply how where and when That has not changed....only now it is unhidden. Rights are Your Birthright....bestowed by Nature given by God States are social political structures and institution..... Trump is a Maverick..... In spite of him African Americans will thrive

As seen through the lens of both the Monroe Doctrine and the Roosevelt Corollary....the actions taken by The President is neither Illegal or Unconstitutional. Might Makes Right....Privileges are granted. If you grant yourself a privilege it becomes a right as long as you can defend it....it is the law of the jungle True True Thank you The Power of the Constitution is only as Strong as how Willing and Able the People of US are to Enforce and Apply it. You see "I see it a little different But it is... Separation of State and Federal....States Powers or States Rights That's its purpose... So the President can do the biddings of those who got him in Power.....A Faction of the Global Elite It is working just fine for some

Skin color is genetic... Race is not genetic.....but social Race is not genetic.... Skin color is one factor associated with/to race...... among many As far as science goes....yes all humanity is based on earth All organizations and government are social Ok cool

Cool No.... Not true as seen by US past behavior... Roosevelt Corollary....The US reserve the Right to act as an International Police - especially in cases involves US Laws and Interests and the Western Hemisphere. Stopping those will not increase their personal and national money flow It's not just dope....and there is a lot of money in that Its more about Oil And rules and loop holes that loose his authority. And freed by how they choose to interpret and apply them Yes.... But that's how it's been....has it? Yes WPR is a loop hole or escape clause. It allows the President to use military force without notifying Congress for a period of time...without it being unconstitutional. cool American Corporations want to....usual suspect - Oil in the South China Sea That is also true. True How many times have they tried and failed to impeach this current President. What does that tell you?

If so then it has Been proven as false.....genetically cool Thank you... So then it is purely and only Social I think Genesis means Beginning....correct me if I'm wrong? GEN is beginning and ESIS is Action or process However if the E is changed to an I another level of interpretation opens up GEN Isis or Gene of Isis as in Generation of Isis Sis means Sister Isis or Aset/Auset/Eset means She is the Throne Yes No it is not.. Anything pertaining to Federal is Socio-political... Exactly Exactly So is white...as the very same genes are involved in both black and white skin You said so yourself okay this is turning out to be another rabbit hole I best not go down true Please Elaborate....as I see 666? not 2/3's

Cool... Drug Cartels....is that a Law Enforcement issue? Why to Declare War on Drugs and or Drug dealers? The President also is Commander in Chief of the Military....as a result can order the military to use force where and when he see fit It's a technicality instead of a Declaration of War.....It's An Authorization under the War Powers Resolution. True That is currently true...especially in Eurasia and in this Western Dominated World. Hope is just as Good....Expect is a little stronger I think it was more of an attempt at Resource grab on the behave of the Corporatocracy.. That is also true as an added benefit. They did not....so we will never know for sure. We can always conjecture....

I cannot speak for the bay horse All human as Homo sapiens stem from Black African. Maybe so...but of one single origin Y-chromosome Adam I believe the White phenotype does come from black.....and I have said so That is the job of an adversary You said we all come from basal Adam? All white came thru Black? Ok....we concur Are you then saying that ....The primitive males that are intersex are another human Specie or Race ? Define Specie? Vis-a-vis Define Race? As you seemed to be using them interchangeable. True True... But the genes involved in causing those differences are the same in all of modern human beings. The difference is how they express and the degree to which they express. Hence Genetically and Biologically we are the Same Race....regardless of skin color and features. ok True....you did not so I did it... What is your intense meaning of the root word "GEN'? Etymology online. really how so We can tacitly agree on that Chromosomes and Genes are like unto Stems in Words Yes Race is not based on anything Genetic.... it is 100% Socially based and only Associated with selected Skin coloration and Features as a means of differentiation. Please provide the Scientific Name of that other human specie still in existence today? That is and has been my point all along.....That Skin color alone does not make us another race or specie. Yet we do not find this in Modern Humans....offsprings are usually fertile and having no deformities regardless of sex. I quote you in the following red words.... Likewise, when a horse mates with a donkey, it becomes obvious that they are two distinct species because the offspring is usually NOT fertile or have other genetic deformities. Is it Nurture or Nature?....Is it Spirit or Nature? It depends on the milieu in which they grow and mature....to a great extend Grow a dog among wolves and he will howl... The Socialization and or Acculturation does result in forms of Assimilation or if you will training. Which does overwhelms the Spirit if but for a time In such a situation a dog will try to meow and a pig whinny in its own way or make attempts True Self-Fertilization do occur in other living creatures In humanity it is the stuff of religion myth and fiction.....or is that virgin birth I guess even snails love to fornicate.....rather than just reproduce or replicate or autogamy Explain the key mosaic? It does....where chapter and verse please.? I know of.... New International Version So God created mankind in his own image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them. Gender is Sociology....as in Congruence Confirming or Affirming social and cultural norms mores and expectations. Sex is biology Sex is assign based on observable external biological anatomy Sex "assign"ment is a medical decision(may involve medical procedure) when biology is not distinct or clear....in other words ambiguous Sex Re"assign"ment is a Surgical Operation to Reconstruct various aspect of Human Anatomy and Physiology. So please expound Can the Y chromosome produce an ovum? Yes those that happen by oppression is dark... aren't those that happen by Nature a deformity?