frankster

True....Here is the thing Those who are born Here are descendants....of all who came - maters not when or how they came Slavery or Colonialism two sides of the same Coin....That is the Theory and Pratice of White Supremacy None escape the ravages of Racism.... True.... That is so.....because we have yet to overcome and uproot the indoctrination of self hate. To struggle against Injustice is Righteouness True...all of them are our Savior Yes...such is always the case The problem is Ignorance that then becomes Arrogance Chiefly manifesting itself in some people believeing that they are more deserving than others

We all Africans.... Some of us are Black Africans We black Africans....here in the West Some came free on ships... Some of us been here before the slave ships..... Some of us came here on slave ships.... Some of us came here after the slave ships... Some of us came here on planes.. All this is but an attempt to further create disunity in the Black African community....Pan - African Manmade borders and philosophys cannot blind me to the recognition of who is my brother in Suffering(black people) and in Struggle(all peoples regardless of race or ethnicity so long as they fight to end oppression in all it forms) whether they know or recognize it or not.

Not entirely sure what you are asking me to prove..... But if it is the splitting up of Pangea into continents.... There is about 6 or seven ways to prove this....lets go with Plate Tectonics Drift... Hope this National Geographic simple expose is satisfactory... I have now produce proof in ancient writings and now modern science.... You have yet to produce any proof that it only happen less than 5000 yrs ago???? Continental Drift 101 | National Geographic You provided no proof... Your task as I remember it was to prove that the earth split into Continents about 5000 yrs ago. That humans were in America.....I never address or present any arguments as to whether or not they were - thats call a strawman fallacy Nor did I say Homo erectus and humans interbred or existed during the continental drift....If I did please present it? Yes the ealiest Bones and tools found in the America....is the Clovis people and Luzia both over 10,000 yrs old but none over 25,000 yrs old - making them all much younger than 200 million yrs old when the earth split into continents No you did not.... I never ask for proof of human in the Americas... Or whom or what Homo Erectus Interbred with.... I ask for Proof of the The split up of Pangea occuring around 5000 yrs ago???? Never said humans sailed boats 2 million yrs ago....that issue was never addressed - so let me address it from the known and accepted Western Archeology. Humans Got to the Americas around 10-13 thousand yrs ago....maybe even 25 thousand yrs ago Boats were being use 8,000 yrs ago to 50,000 yrs ago I need not try again You ask for script and I provided ancient script....they are originals real and authentic. If your christian or western bias precludes you from accepting them as real knowledge....Whether or not you accept those script is up to you. Never the less they align with current understanding of continental drift Then when you awake please provide those cave paintings....that prove continental drift or the splitting up of the super continent pangea...? You have provided no such proof... I never said the earth split 2 million years ago.....I said the earth split around 300 - 200 million yrs ago At no point did I say boats were built 2 million yrs ago.....if so please provide it? What I said was they used boats....And since the first humans to reach the Americas got there well under 25,000 yrs ago - boats were already in use by humans Any proof for any of these assertions???? Please Do not prove that boats were around Prior during or after Seneferu....that I have already established - since Seneferu was born around 4600 yrs ago and boats were already around 8,000 yrs ago Prove your other assertions... 1. That the earth had not yet split prior to or around the birth of Seneferu?

True Depending on where you are on Earth....Creatures of a Kind may Appear with differing characteristics. True..... Yes the study of the .... geography is a science/study that deals with the description, distribution, and interaction of the diverse physical, biological, and cultural features of the earth's Systems and Processes of Weathering and Climates. Which only serves to further elucidates and support what I am saying... Yes...Earth is the Planet and Geography is the Study of the Planet Climate is a Part of Geography....of course they are not the same Geography encompass climate....climate is a subset of geography - they are not separate Those words weren't made/coin yet....but the actually process was already on going The words "after its kind" was one of the ways the Ancients reference it The phrase "After its Kind" is I am not Attempting....on this point they do **Forgive me my computer began acting up and things got deleted if I left out anything please bring it to my attention** Change is a Universal Constant Evolution is about Natural Selection (Sex Selection and Fitness) which results in Adaptation Well in Genesis Chapter 1 we read: 12 And the earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed after his kind, and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed was in itself, after his kind: and God saw that it was good. 21 And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that it was good. 25 And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good. According to THOSE scriptures, not only did GOD bring forth and create the vegetation and animals for them to reproduce after their kind, but HE saw that they were good. Why would that which is already good need to "change" or "adapt" or "evolve"??? **The above what I tried to reinsert** here is my responses Genesis 30:37-34 And Jacob took him rods of green poplar, and of the hazel and chesnut tree; and pilled white strakes in them, and made the white appear which was in the rods. And he set the rods which he had pilled before the flocks in the gutters in the watering troughs when the flocks came to drink, that they should conceive when they came to drink And the flocks conceived before the rods, and brought forth cattle ringstraked, speckled, and spotted And Jacob did separate the lambs, and set the faces of the flocks toward the ringstraked, and all the brown in the flock of Laban; and he put his own flocks by themselves, and put them not unto Laban's cattle. Because Perfection is unattainable for Creation and creatures.....but it is Good - Satisfactory Desirable and Godlike or Godkind It is incorrect.... The most evolve depends on Natural and Sex Selection and Fitness Yes....not all change is Adaptive(progressive) - some are Maladaptive(regressive). Yes so you say and you also quoted Muhammad teachings that oppose that teaching... Saying in short...That monkeys De/Evolve from White men Yes it does... Exactly Elijah taught....Apes came from white men and you implied that last to evolved is the most evolved - Then if the apes are the last to evolved...then according to your theory they then must be the most evolved. On 2/20/2026 at 6:49 AM, Pioneer1 said: In other word, Africans are LESS EVOLVED and CLOSER TO APES! On 2/23/2026 at 3:49 PM, Pioneer1 said: If your theory teaches that Africans were the first humans AND that other races/ethnicities outside of Africa evolved FROM Africans....that clearly implies that African humans are not AS EVOLVED as those other races/ethnicities of humans. _______________________________________________________________________________ you also said: Elijah Muhammad taught that apes came from them. Not that they came from apes...but that apes came from them; trying to change themselves back into the Original Man. Those two statements can only be reconciled if you believe ....Apes are more Evolved than White man... Do You Believe Apes are more Evolved than White men? They also contradict your assertions and implications.. If Elijah's theory of the origin of the white man is based on the Yacub story Who did Yacub experiment with...apes?? Was Yacub black or white? Ok Does modern society and its inventions does not provide enough information? Call it what you like So true....maybe more true than you realize or know. I thought it was a greeting... of/or acknowledgement of another presence word.

No...... it is not a "wild guess" If guess it is ....it is based on science. Bones and tools make up the some of the evidence Some are Still being dug up...Others have already been dug up How do you know that? What is the methodology you used? They used Boats...sailed Humans Started using boats....thats how the foot prints got there. or The Bering straits Land Bridge Theory Most if not all early Humans and Hominids/Hominins originated in Africa Homo Erectus travel out side of Africa....And spread all over the globe I never said whether or not humans lived on Pangea What I think I said was that Pangea began split some 300 to 200 million years ago According modern archaeology humans first appeared approximately some 6 million yrs ago.... The Ancients Disagree with modern archaeology....place human origins much further back The Ramayana speaks of the Earth being one Landmass "Oh, sons, you may therefore proceed to search for the horse and its thief on this Entire Earth which is Garlanded by the Ocean. Safety upon you all." [Ramayana : 1-39-13] https://sanskritdocuments.org/sites/valmikiramayan/baala/sarga39/balasans39.htm so they are writings If you know of cave paintings that can date the splitting of the One single Landmass into several Continents....please present? cool

Gen 1:24 And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind Could earth here mean - Geography... Many Animal and Plants are known for being Regionally specific and Variation specific Geography means Climate...Climate means Flora and Fauna equals Diet and Lifestyle All the ingredients for Adaptations and Mutations Most Living and Non Living things comes in various forms... Kind means a particular type or one of a similar group... Kind even means species Change is a Universal Constant Evolution is about Natural Selection (Sex Selection and Fitness) which results in Adaptation No two people are Exactly the same....Children do not look exactly like either parent Children may inherit certain features from one parent or the other causing Change I would agree They are us....Homo sapiens. It contradicts those teachings And those teachings contradicts your earlier assertions....that the latest evolved is the most evolved - or words to that effect Yes if you are referring to the Yakub story line....that Elijah Muhammad my have taught that - I do not know Elijah's teachings on this topic to the full extent. Yes....Elijah's Teachings....whether or not they are accurate or you are accurate about them. What is clear is that Elijah's teachings contradicts your assertion and implications I quote: On 2/23/2026 at 3:49 PM, Pioneer1 said: If your theory teaches that Africans were the first humans AND that other races/ethnicities outside of Africa evolved FROM Africans....that clearly implies that African humans are not AS EVOLVED as those other races/ethnicities of humans. Explain why you not sure that apes are less evolve that white men??? No....Boys become Men Butterflies do not come from caterpillars... They transform or morph into a butterfly... You are confusing words colloquial informal usage and their actual meanings. That's is correct verbiage.. No it is not. Spanish Evolved Derived Descended or even Influenced by Latin.... "Come from" is informal and does tend to confuse. Exactly..... that is what "comes from" means as in - a baby comes from its mother Thanks for the confession....though it seems you did not know, that is what you did. Yes...sort of.

After its kind....it never said after it self - kind as in "kinda" Changed in the sense of adaptation cool....to you it does - imply. To me it does not.... True....he is entitled to his opinions and beliefs. Does it means that Elijah Muhammad supports The Theory of Evolution? So says science of genetics... I do not know that white humans evolves from black humans....What I do know is that white skin is a recessive trait in humans - mutation/variation. Linear Thinking is too dependent on one perspective....deductive reasoning takes into account many perspectives Common sense is usually a collection of prejudices appealed to so as not to have to think That contradicts your earlier assertion of the teachings of Elijah Muhammad that apes evolve from white men....apes appear less evolve than white men to me - is that/this not the case for you? Clearly not the way you are trying to explain it as you have already contradicted your own explanation... One would have to discern Who is fittest and most adapted to their environment.....which is planet Earth. Yes Yes cool No...Men do not come from boys(as in reproduction). Boys become Men to come from and become are two different things To "come from" is a usually Place of Origin or Direction To "become" is usually a State of Being Speaking physically... Boys change into Men Men do not change to boys Boys become Men Culturally/Socially and Biologically....At which time they can sire or reproduce boys or girls with a fertile women/female Boys come from pregnant women as a baby.

True I do not know exactly how Nature compensate for breaking obligations.....its usually along already existing fault lines. It should not be seen as punishment...but away to induce correction/adjustment - for doing something damaging. For example if you put your bare hand in a fire knowing or unknowingly....it will cause pain - is that pain punishment? That's the purpose of Spirituality Herbalism and Medicine....One of many means to reconcile or pacify the discomfort experience. Most Illness are caused by Ignorance.....Wrong Action or Wrong Mental Attitude - In other Words the EightFold Path I meant it.....The article did not mentioned Omar Al Bashir directly.... It did mention local whites - of which Bashir is an example.....Though they do not call themselves white - More likely to call themselves Arabs I used Bashir as an example as I did before when I mentioned My Sister being classified differently Racially in USA SouthAfrica and Ghana. Race is a social convention....so each society has its own specific definition and meaning of what qualifies as a criterion for Race There is the popular trope of the "Mi No Black" saying ascribe to vary dark (obviously black to our eyes) "Dominicans" when speaking of themselves racially. Outside of Western influence....they would most likely be considered different Ethnicities or Nationalities If not for The Western Ideology Races....The Idea of Race would most likely not come into their Minds of Thoughts - you would just be seen as a Foreigner/Outsider The whole Concept of Race as we Know is a Western Ideology They do not see differences as racial........They do not interpret phenotypic differences as Racial - but Ethnic They do not accept race or racial classification....They consider them as human beings of a different Nation Ethnicity or Tribe You are still considering race - That's the problem you are having......it seems. You can only see the world through the Western Ideology of Race - Skin color first - White Yellow Red and Black....and all that those connotes or entails Yes Arabs and Black are Ethnicities.....You have many blacks that are Arabs and many Arabs that are black The idea of them being different races is.....Mostly create by and for Western media - A form of Cultural Imperialism Yes You said the following : "only has reality" is still REALITY none the less. Reality is Reality. If it's in Existence....it's Reality. Doesn't matter WHERE in Reality it is....if it Exists....it's Reality." Please bear in mind that I am Not questioning Who is behind the propaganda....Very likely a racists individual group or institution I Am saying the Claims of the Propaganda is false inaccurate and a lie...That blacks are cursed or that blacks descended from monkey. I will definitely try.... Go Ahead... cool Here you are doing the same thing you just did with "realities"......now you doing it with race and ethnicity How do you define Race vis a vis/vs Ethnicity?

Yes...Modern Evolutionary Theory and especially the use of the word evolution.. The Ancients would use the term "After its Kind" Yes Darwin is so considered.... All evidence so far support "out of Africa". It is proper to distrust information coming from both racist Individuals and their racist Institutions. It is also easy to recognize their blind spot....and differentiate it from Facts Evidence and Accurate Interpretation Possible blind spot.. You may infer and or accept that if you choose to... We do not descend from apes is clear....so that comparison is false. It can also be said....Whether true or not - That Europeans phenotypically have more traits in common with Apes and Neanderthal Pure propaganda It is now being Acknowledge in many establish scientific schools of thought and study that Europeans have more Neanderthal Genes than Africans If that be true then one can infer.....they must be closer in relationship to neanderthal than African One can then further infer since Homo sapiens are the most evolved hominids.....and Africans are the purest Homo sapiens - then they must be the furthest from Apes And your understanding and interpretation of it... And possible the reason why you reject it Not the racially motivated blind spots There you go trying to "pigeon holing" individuals to your limited understanding.

Yes True Thanks All Contracts are Agreements.....with binding consequences. An Agreement is mutual.....usually between two or more parties - each having their Role - duties and responsibilities. Failure by any party to execute its obligation will result in incongruity. S/He has broken the Contractual agreement and is now suffering the consequence.....inability to distinguish between realities and behave appropriately. The article did not referred to him directly.... True True... Yes this is true to people who accept the idea of races according to modern day Western European definition No...These would be considered the same race by modern Western European standards The difference between both groups is as a result that some see themselves as Arabized Africans (ethnicity) and muslim(religion) while the other are Native African(ethnicity) christian or animist(Religion). Exactly NO....I do not agree I Quote you below "only has reality" is still REALITY none the less. Reality is Reality. If it's in Existence....it's Reality. Doesn't matter WHERE in Reality it is....if it Exists....it's Reality." Says you.... But it is obvious that the unrestrained is more free than the restrained. Science Thanks Some work is best done by yourself....This I will not do for you. I have both told you where to look and point the way The word Lore in folklore also means Knowledge I also Respect my brothers and sisters You may believe they are true.....I do not Do YOU think that white people are trustworthy in general or only tell the truth all the time? I trust and accept science not necessarily white people.... Their is the Human Race and Socio-political ideology of Races. Flavor and color is just the various Ethnicities.

ok here goes Pangaea existed about 240 million years ago. By about 200 million years ago, this supercontinent began breaking up. Over millions of years, Pangaea separated into pieces that moved away from one another. These pieces slowly assumed their positions as the continent we recognize today. https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/continental-drift/ Homo erectus, extinct species of the human genus(Homo), perhaps an ancestor of modern humans (Homo sapiens). H. erectus most likely originated in Africa, though Eurasia cannot be ruled out. Regardless of where it first evolved, the species seems to have dispersed quickly, starting about 1.9 million years ago (mya) near the middle of the Pleistocene Epoch, moving through the African tropics, Europe, South Asia, and Southeast Asia. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Homo-erectus I never said they were or were not contemporaneous...,,either way you are introducing this into the discussion.... Now you provide your supporting links......

The continent existed as per my information before during and after homo erectus... provide your proof or supporting links So you are saying the Continents drifted apart less than 4000 yrs ago....could you be referring to the flood(younger dryas)??? It may had not been called Africa ...... but the continent was there The Earth was one landmass over 200 million yrs ago...That Single Land was called - Pangea Yes

They are... Yes....AI can lead many astray Professionals and scientist are not so easily led astray by fakes fraudsand counterfeit. The facts pertaining to the theory of evolution are all open to questions and disputations.. The are also levels to realities It is a contract.....if a signatory decides to unilaterally break a contractual agreement then they be consequences. Sounds like a Psychosis....Delusionary Sudan has always been dominated by a light-skinned, Arabic-speaking elite, while black Africans in the south and west of the country have faced discrimination and marginalisation. A few weeks ago, an Islamist columnist at Al-Intibaha, a daily newspaper supportive of ex-President Omar al-Bashir, who does not approve of women playing football, referred to the female football coach of the Gunners, a well-known youth team for girls, as a slave. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-53147864 As I said colorism this the White men light skinned men they were referring to.....does he look like he would be thought of as a white man US. Very likely colorism.... ethnic hatred - as both Indians and Africans are considered black in America My Sister is Considered Black in America....White in Ghana....and Colored in South Africa.....Whose rubric are you using??? Race as it is currently define all over the Globe is primarily a Western European Ideology. Not entirely true.... Some Bantu look Somali and vice versa Thank you.... As I showed above it is the same thing happening in Africa....its not racial but ethnic. Won't argue that point... My original point was always that realities differ... You are the one who is trying to make all realities one and the same.. You seemed to be confused.... My original argument remains the same.... Show me the changes I have made....link copy and paste. That is a degree of free Being restrained is a lessor degree of free That is a greater degree of free Thank you Yes That depends on you Life like energy can only be transform.....never destroyed Even our liberties has restrictions..... African Cultural mores and spirituality also agrees That's a good place to start... Not true.... Africans has always consider fellow creatures as our brothers....as in Brer Rabbit Those two claims are pure falsities Because it was propaganda....used to divide demean persecute and abuse In other words they were always lies And the biggest of those lies is.....the idea of Races My point is the originated in what is now called Africa.....hence African I await you documentation and supporting evidence.... How old is Ancient Egypt? They originated in Africa....to me that makes them African They may not be Homo sapiens sapiens....but they are Africans

No....I do not. Here is a paraphrase of this line of argument as I remember it...correct me where I am wrong You said: Neanderthals can not be africans I said: they are descendants of Homo Erectus who were Africans You Said: Home Erectus could not be Africans because the earth did not split into continents when they were around I Said: the earth split into continents 200 millions yrs ago and homo Erectus was around 2 millions yrs ago....so that's long after the earth split into continents. So I am confused as to why you introduce Ancient Egypt????

All information is secured and placed in custody once vetted....any evidence tampered with is no longer considered evidence. Hence the reasoning behind the continuation of proving... That's the Vetting process Yes....as assertions are often a form of interpretation Exactly... Evidencing is the securing and recording of that rain. Yes That's not a disputation....thats ignoring That is how science operates proven facts are always open to challenge and disputation Hence the reason why proof is always open to dispute....and is continually and constantly tested and proven over and over They are..... They are in this physical reality....because they agree to being here - that contract is still in effect They have broken the agreement and as a result must deal with the consequences - split personality or schizophrenia Show me an example of this. Provide an example Example According to how race is defined in the West....they are all of the same race - hence it is ethnic It is very difficult to tell them apart. Those are wars of a tribalistic nature in Europe.... Northern Ireland vs Ireland...Western Europe - Ethnic War Arabs Jews and Africans experience racial violence in Western Europe continually. That is your point....my point is that it is not the same as physical reality Two different Realities. Physical reality is not the same as social reality....though they overlap at times and in spaces provide example The inmate was and may still be free enough to attack a CO....That is an exercise of free will - resistance reprisal and rebellion. find another example. God/Nature....The Awakened - The Enlightened Cosmic Consciousness Yes...that is why I used both of them Freeness has no limit Absent or dead to mean may not mean dead or absent to others. Do not confuse your limitations for that of others Free has no limits Dead to who or what Name the term....if it qualifies or fit - I will share my comprehension of it It happens continually Thank you The Idea that we descend from monkeys True The vast majority of Sciences agree and accept the out of Africa theory as true. I agree His opinions on that issue is in the minority....and also based on religious dogma - non scientific purely a belief in historical myth and or legend. Agreed Truth is not always or only based on consensus.... This is a overwhelming of Evidence... This is a preponderance of scientific thought and the results of scientific experimentations This is religious dogma....by decree it was establish as accepted - not by scientific experimentation. The were coerced into believing such as true.... The preponderance of available evidence... Evidence not available cannot be vetted or tested. Hence one of the reasons all truths or proofs are constantly and continually tested. Its available all over the web check origin story or creation myth I do not have to witness some one burning or burned to death to know that fire can kill. We have already we down a road or line of reasoning similar to this I will not answer that for you at some point you must think or remember If you wish not to think and instead wish to remain simply minded then that's on you.

I never stated anything to the fact as to whether or not homo erectus was around at the time of the Ancient Egyptian Civilization Provide relevance and some supporting documentations of your assertion

Then it is a problem of them not accepting or being convinced.. The Evidence is still true cool cool Again the Evidence cannot contradict only the Interpretation can. Assertions are primarily statements of Beliefs or opinions...in short assertions are basically Presumptive Assumption based insufficient Evidence Proof is a statement or proposition that is accepted or regarded as Established. Proof is a continuous Process and always open to dispute To dispute an Established Truth one must design an experiment that can disprove and prove your disputation....otherwise it remain an Assertion The simply answer is......Yes... This reality is based on Agreement..... Racism is associated/based on Skin Color Phenotype Culture and Place of Origin Tribalism is based on Ethnicity Heritage and Culture. Colorism is based on Complexion skin Tone or Hue within racial and ethnic categories. Colorism Tribalism/Ethnic wars/cleansing Tribalism/Ethnic wars/cleansing The Tribal/Ethnic Wars of the former Yugoslavia throughout the 1990's. The Current Russo-Ukrainian war could be framed as a Tribal/Ethnic war....Ethnic Russians Against Ethnic Ukrainians - I consider then on the same level as the examples I gave above....Tribal Yes....but not the same The "intellectual" part is mental Do not leave out the "properties"....that part is physical. That's depends on your Skills and Creativity Do tell?? Yes Who isn't limited or restricted in some form shaped or way... To be Free and at Liberty is the ability to be continually realizing more of your will Hence Free Will is a God Given/Natural Right all living things are endowed with. Yes.... Laws and Rules increase Potential Laws and Rules are there to protected and promote civilization and its many benefits for all....thereby ensuring more freedom for all Only Nature is Truly Free and Unrestricted... We Live within Nature... We all having Limitations in the sense that we are Entities or Individuals. To be an Entity one must be Separated and to be an Individual one must be Encapsulated....we are both. Separation is Limiting and Encapsulation is Restrictive. Will do... Its happening everyday....little by little The Struggle Continues.....Aluta Continua Vitoria e certa Bob and weave retreat and advance. Yes They have change the game nevertheless.....and no amount of discrediting their success will take away from what they have accomplished The science has so far has proven it to be a lie....The Theory that we are descended from Monkeys is false. Not according to Science That is false according to current Science. According current science from many different fields of study and schools of thought.....all Homo sapiens Come from Africa and are descendants of Africans. The "We" represents what the vast majority of current scientific thought has accepted as true knowledge I do not have to be there to surmise accurately what has transpired. The preponderance of Evidence say it is so Only if you are ignorant of the actual scientific information. African first said we Africans are the first people on Earth Please....your ignorance of Africa is astounding So do some research on your own it is often more convince when you find it your self.....the ego tends to not feel defensive We live in the West so our prejudice and disdain for African Science call their creation story myths So to find ant people story of the first peoples look up......Origin Story or Creation myth

Evidence is all pieces of the proof..... You cannot have proof or prove anything without evidence With enough evidence it becomes undeniable and indisputable....hence proof The Evdience does not Contradict..... The Interpretation of the evidence may contradict.... With enough evidence.....it becomes indisputable - we arrive at proof Cool We all share in this reality....only when we agree. There are Levels to this our Shared Reality Do not conflate tribalism and colorism with racism....they are similar and may even overlap but they are not the same. Yes....in the Mind It may no longer be a Physical Reality. True.....you have a Right to exercise your Free Will or not - thats your choice. You not in custody till you agree and give in or up....if you resisting you free So long as you fleeing and resisting.....you not in agreement so you free Since many have done...it was not unlikely Today the vast majority of Africans in American are free of Physical whippings shackles and serfdom....We done started to exercise our Free will to disagree It was Never meant to be easy.....whips and cages etc are very persuasive and many succumb and agree. Whether you are only an annoyance or more....it can bring the game down - by causing small incremental changes in how the game is played. Haiti has change the game....forever - it is for us to keep it moving in the direction Haiti set They are no longer an enslaved colony....thats a change in how they game is played True Yes....all information should be vetted It does not matter how it make me feel....truth is truth. If you are seeking something to make you feel good..... Remember Truth often hurts before it free's you In other words truth is not the place to go seeking for good feelings..... lies do a much better job of producing good feelings..... as it ensnares. So what....you would rather live in denial or live a lie???? If Africans come from monkey we all come from monkey... What we know is that Africans are the first Homo sapien sapien and all modern human are their descendants Truth is we do not come from Monkeys or Apes....so you laboring under a misconception meant to ridicule so you running and hiding out of ignorance.

The Continents Drifted apart about 200 million yrs ago......Homo Erectus existed 2 million yrs ago - Africa was already a distinct Continent by them No Name...only Satan's Seed. Any one who does evil is Satan's Seed or disobey's God....It is not Genetics - it is Memetic a Moral and or a Pyscho-Social Mind set. Cool....we are all entitled to our opinions. But we must also realize when they are not based on genetics facts.....but on religious dogma. Yes it does... mostly as it relates to History - in order to teach a Moral and or Spiritual lesson. Basically all evil comes back on to the evil doers.....whilst God's blessings are given to them all regardless of Moral status.

Homo Erectus is African being that Its Origin is on the Continent.... Homo Erectus is the Immediate Ancestor of Neanderthal..... Are You saying that Africans Only have Nappy hair? It is the same gene that is responsible for straight or wavy or nappy hair cool Does this Offspring of Eve and the Serpent have a Name? cool THis reads like some form of Dispensationalism....I do not think it is wrong or bad just it seems to me it has no rules direction or clear lines of demarcation. It can be too easily used prejudicially to support any or anyones personal agenda or political opinions.....like reading tea leaves or Scrying. While I think the bible is about Eternal Spiritual Truths....Not about Geo-politics but about you the individual

Evidence is an indication of what happened or is happening.....from which inferences can be made Not if they have evidence... One can not be every where and every when.... If you see prints in Sand or dirt...one can tell much of what transpired and often how long ago and what made it That depends on how much evidence is left and the state of your technology and knowledge. It is not the same...that is true. As no two experiences are the same...even in sex but for some it is enough or even better....in any case inferences can be deduced. Again it depends on your expertise and available technology No You can only be sure of what you now know....not what you may know in the future True Truth is truth no matter who or where it comes from Thru Genetic science I do not know if they do or not.... Yes cool We splitting hairs here... One must first agree....then participate Yes....we still live in a North American culture.. and there is no racism in most of so called subsaharan Africa like unto Europe. It is limited to Time and Place.....Change a Universal Constant Race is not a biological or genetic reality. Race is a social reality When you fight....you not in the game - you are in resistance. As long as you are in the state of fleeing....then you are not in the game - Many have successfully done so.... Non violent resistance....does change the game Good.....you did not submit to the rules of the game - you are now a threat to the game They are a threat, in resistance and remain independent.....they remain an inspiration. They want to be in the game....prep trained selected willing able and ready.

True.. I asked for evidence but if you have proof then present it.. Yes....I experienced reading the information Genetic memory That maybe true... We are forced to accept the truth we know now and act from there......not the truth we may know in the future from which we cannot act They came to their own conclusion reluctantly....that they were descended from Africans. Yes and No Reality is Realities There are many Realities and many levels to each Reality There is more to Reality than we both think or will ever knowYes There is Your Reality and Shared Reality.....Shared Reality is agreed upon. Not entirely true....its the same culture and geography It does need to be qualified....for its existence is dependent on society and its institutions There is a difference between physical reality and social reality.... Its not food for argument..... Can you taste social reality? ......you can easily taste physical reality? - so there is a qualitative difference Yes I see an infinite options You could fight? flee? play the game but by your own rules? just not cooperate?....etc Ask the Haitians and the thousands of Maroons settlements that existed.....Palenques and Quilombos Thousands escaped... You not in the game....they trying to get you to play Not true Many have exited without using death

Present the evidence? If memory serves....the earliest people of the americas are the so-called Clovis people then the found luzia - turns out she was African. Though some now argue that she was Australopithecus Even the Chinese spent millions of $$$$ to prove that they were not descendants of Africans. Yes... Not all realities enduring and exist independent of and stand on it own....some realities are dependent limited transient manmade constructions. Racism today is not the same as racism of yesteryears Socially realities only exist within societies....as soon as those social structures are no longer supported- they fade Physically realities exist independent of society....within without before after and during. Yes No You have free will... You can refuse to play... or refuse to play by the rules of the game True I do not think he shouldn't....We live in a racist society and that is how people are described. I Accept race as a Social Construct....and I know I live in a racist society - As such I know the Laws and Rules that are applicable

According to what I know all hominids hominins homo and human have one common ancestor who originated in Africa.... As they travel around the globe over many years of mutation they develop variation and diverged that resulted in speciation... Neanderthal are I think the are descendants of Homo Erectus....Homo Erectus is out of Africa.... Human beings that share the same contemporaneous time period will and do intermix. Tell me why the Serpent is a human? The whole ideology of Races was invent and propagated by racist and racism.. So far all arguments to support its existence or reality scientifically biological or genetically has been disproven I do not question its Authenticity as a Social Convention or Construct.....As it effects are very real in societies were it is accepted and enforced Explain....as I see thy head and his heel again explain?

cool cool We Know.....every scientific school of thought we have that has a bearing on this issue comes back supporting African and Africans being the source of all Human beings By using.......The Scientific Method Same way a geologist knows what's under the ground without being under ground...thru Study Observation Science and Technology Back engineering....Reverse Genetics Racism Race and Races only has reality in a social setting where it is accepted as true and enforce it by law and practice Same as how only in a game of monopoly do you get $200 for passing Go...because the players accept it as true and enforce it by rule and play.