3 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

Dark skinned AfroAmerican celebrities with strong African features should be celebrated above and beyond White or even light AfroAmericans celebrities in our community.

 

 

I gotta tell you, I am a little indifferent about this issue. I do not believe that down playing light skinned African Americans is the right thing to do altogether. I believe that we should highlight dark skinned AfroAmerican celebrities more and more, but we should never suppress lighter skinned ones at all. I don't think that we should give into that kind of programming at all. There have been so many times that, had it not have been for lighter skinned AfroAmericans that stood against racism, I would not be here today. 

We don't need to push down one group to highlight another. Let us do both at the same time. Let's work together. However, when it comes to racism and perhaps certain venues, then yes, it may be a good choice to select a darker skinned person for a specific cause. 

 

If a lighter skinned Sista is more brilliant than a darker one, may the best one be elevated, and not based on skin color, but how that person shines in all of her features. If a light skinned Brother is better than a darker one, well, they are both 'Black men' and may the best one be put forth to represent our cause. But yes, when it comes to representation as a whole, the percentage of light skinned versus darker skinned needs to be addressed. Something is wrong, if we are seeing more light skinned than dark skinned people being elevated. But many times, dark skinned people hide their issues with Colorism within and that can be just as bad or even worse.

 

For example, some of the celebrities that you even posted have married White people and so, wouldn't that be counter productive in defining our 'race' without the issue of White Supremacy? And what about the Black beauties that have gotten older and show no sign of getting married and having children. How does that ideal promote our culture? You know, I think education is a major key in the improvement of our existence. 

 

I think blonde hair is a beauty trait, but many of us have no idea of its origin. I think that we have been made to think it is a White trait and therefore obsess over it, but education is key. IMO, to see someone, Black or dark skinned with blonde hair, or grey hair, or White hair, meaning, light colored hair, might be a huge compliment in how they look. So it's not that it is negative, but it is how we have been made to think that it is a White trait. 

5 minutes ago, ProfD said:

Colorism started way back on the slave plantations. Centuries of conditioning & programming. Gonna take a long time to undo.

 

I agree, it's going to take a long time to undo.

And I applaud all of the efforts too, that have been made to this goal. 

But here is an observation that I see no matter how I try to ignore it; it seems that everything positive that has occurred, there has been a sneaky underlying effort to mock us and attack us, bit by bit and then change and reverse the effort and mostly; downgrade it to a ridiculous event that may not be recognized right away. Let me give you an example of what I mean. In your first comment you said:

 

 

9 minutes ago, ProfD said:

There have been short-lived movements that promoted Black love & pride.

 

And so, no matter how I try to ignore my intuitions and no matter how I try to make myself believe that I am reading to much into it, I still have this lingering thought. The word that you used 'pride' has been systematically exploited, in my opinion, and this is not a light matter. This 'Black Pride Movement' occurred a few decades ago, and now look!!!

This world has been used to promote a global movement among people of African descent and then made to be associated with the entire western and European world!!!

Now, the term 'PRIDE' has been attached to a flag, globally. So now, no matter what, when I think of 'Black Pride' I immediately think about the 1960s and today's Homosexual Movement simultaneously. This government took the late Jesse Jackson's movement and merged it with the Homosexual Movement. No, this was not a coincidence, IMO, this was deliberate. Do I have a problem with this Homosexual Movement headed up by Barack Obama? No I do not. But I do have a problem with Black Americans not dealing with the origins of it and in how it was put upon us during Chattel Slavery times. We are the product of rape here in America. Why is this not being addressed?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On 3/14/2026 at 9:48 AM, Pioneer1 said:

The meaning these men used for that term was clearly different than the understanding most Christians have of it today.
 

 

The Western World has confused many, however, like the very scripture and book that you are referencing, the prophet Daniel wrote that, due to the Black civilizations obsessing over White Idolatry, the Creator gave us over to White domination for 'a time, times and a half of times'. Therefore, it is the White empire governments today that have the chance to either correct sin or ignore it. When they set up on the backs of Black-on-Black Hatred and allow this type of violence to go unchecked, they will be judged for it completely. Likewise, the Creator will not allow, me, a Black woman to correct the priesthood ultimately, however, it will have to be other Black men. Like Jesus said, because he came, Black men would be persecuted no matter if you believe in him or not. Black kings turned their backs on their own governments, their women and their children, and pat each other on the back and allowed abuse to occur and so, White Domination took over. And so, today, many of us are dealing captivity right now, until we get it right. We all have to agree ultimate and that will probably take a thousand years in order to achieve that goal.

 

God will judge the Church first according to scripture and so, due to the July 4th, and the Separation of Church and State, well, a lot of White Christians will need to come forth and fight for truth when it comes to White Supremacy and Colorism. And one of their most insane issues would be their idols that they have erected all over the world of 'the Messiah' in White face and then telling and preaching that it doesn't matter what color Jesus is in reality. That is their ultimate blasphemy. Truth is universal, no matter what color we are. We are all one in Christ. This scripture, 'we are all one in Christ' I believe, has been mis-interpreted to be incorrectly thought of as 'we are all one human race'. That is a confusion. But after Jesus came the first time and had nothing to do with the Romans and their government because of their being Separatist, well, many Gentiles came to the light and fought for the Church to be established during the time of the First Roman Empire. But due to White Supremacy, many of us have been confused. Nevertheless, as I have said, in the New Testament, the phrase 'Son of Man' refers to Jesus Christ. As you have written in connection with Adam, 'Son of Man' means 'a descendant of Adam'and so, yes, Ezekiel did also reference himself on this wise. However, again, as i have said, in the New Testament reference I shared, it referred to 'Jesus Christ'. 

 

 

On 3/14/2026 at 9:48 AM, Pioneer1 said:

Daniel said he saw one who LOOKED LIKE a "son of man" approaching the Ancient of Days
 

Daniel 7: 13

 

" I saw in the night visions, and, behold, one like the Son of man came with the clouds of heaven, and came to the Ancient of days, and they brought him near before him."

 

 

That would be the exact same prophecy that Jesus gave some 500 years later after Daniel wrote it. This refers to Jesus, himself as being 'the Son of Man' coming with clouds, etc. after the Tribulation era. Anyway, here are some references. I tried to find a youtube Short video of an African American preacher. The second video reference is a little long, but he's an African American preacher and I am listening to him now and so far he is doing an awesome job. So anyway, here are three (3) references for this topic. The 'Son of Man' refers to Jesus Christ, and 'the Ancient of Days' refers to the Creator, God Almighty: 

 

AI Overview

 

In Daniel 7, the Ancient of Days (God the Father) is the eternal Judge sitting on a fiery throne,

while the "one like a Son of Man" (Jesus Christ) is a heavenly figure arriving on clouds to

receive everlasting dominion and authority. It depicts a divine transfer of power from the

chaotic earthly beast kingdoms to an eternal, heavenly kingdom

 

 

 

 

***** Daniel Prophesies the Son of Man | Daniel 7:9-14 *****

Just Teach Ministries

**** This video will not embed **** 

 

https://youtu.be/btWeweQtrNk

 

 

21 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

White people aren't actually white in color but rather pink and in the Middle East they are usually red from the heat.

 

My stating 'blood red' has nothing to do with white people.

The earth is 'black' no matter what other minerals or colors are in it in certain regions.

When the astronauts step on the moon, they were amazed do to this very reason.

The entire earth's crust is black and certain mineral deposits like iron in some regions show a presence of other colors such as 'blood red'.

You continue to try and insert white supremacy into black communities and this is what I am referring to about the prophecy of the Bay and Grisled Horse. 

Black people of African descent do not need that kind of confusion.

 

All script goes back to one origin and can be confirmed with the earth or the sky; astronomy. 

The letter 'Y' was added thousands of years later and replaced 'the letter J'in some ancient script and based on dates and times of ancient script, all words go back to a specific time period and when they were used in script. The 'letter Y' would be a replacement letter and must be regarded in context of the words they are used. 

For example; Asshur Shem was born under a specific date but later descendants may be scripted as being 'Shurians', 'the land of Shur', 'Syrians', 'Asshur', or 'Assyrians', etc.  and they each have a specific meaning. 

 

 

17 hours ago, frankster said:

We now know that boats were around long before that date...

 

You will find no proof of that

 

17 hours ago, frankster said:

What is important is that boats have been around and in use over 8000 yrs ago

 

 

no proof

 

Because this American government formed on the basis of enslaving millions of little African children and then lying, we must prove certain ancient histories with confirmations. There is no proof of boats that could sail across the oceans 8000 years ago. 

3 hours ago, ProfD said:

US citizens are criminalized & punished for killing others. Yet, the US government is killing folks with impunity. 

 

The craziest thing is there's no huge public outcry against the US government unaliving people for power & money.

 

They like to believe young folks have been desensitized to violence from playing video games.

 

I am in shock at what is going on!

I worry that in the near future, we as Americans might end up in a vulnerable situation with others that are foreign and in need of help and because of what is happening now, I wonder what the outcome will be. 

Just recently in November 2025, EBT was cut and also, the Housing Authority programs have changed and so, I keep wondering about single Black mothers and how they are dealing with these new laws. 

Have you notice the silence on that issue too?

I think Americans are kind of, in shock and it is not that we are quiet about what is going on in Iran or Mexico, but we are in shock. 

It would be a good thing to trust in our government and in that this system is working to help and protect and provide for its citizens, but on the other hand, a lot of aid has just been cut, the government shut down back in September and then the ICE movements seems to become more and more obvious that we need to be mindful of how our government is acting within our borders too. 

 

I am happy that we have law enforcement though, to deal with the violence that goes on in our system, however, are we really getting the help? 

It seems to me that when it comes to Black-on-Black crime, well, very little effort from our government intervenes. 

 

 

 

 

 

@Pioneer1 Okay. I gotcha. Lol.

 

 

10 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

For you Bible believers out there (and you know who you are...lol),

 

 

10 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

Adam doesn't mean "man" nor does it man "humanity".....it's a SPECIFIC TYPE of person.

 

I guess the most important input from me would be that, when it comes to ancient script, whether it is from ancient Egyptian records, ancient Sumerian, ancient Chinese, ... the Linear B script, Ugarit, etc. all of it must be confirmed with science. What mean is that certain words are 'anchors' and must be confirmed with the planet earth and also 'the sky'. For this reason, it doesn't matter whether the words are translated from cuneiform script, Arabic script, Egyptian hieroglyphs, etc., all translations go back to some origin. 

 

so then, when it comes to terms like 'Son of Man' or 'Adam', the meanings have an origin but over time, the meaning may vary so therefore, you need to look at 'the context' of the whole sentence or phrase, or subject. I can absolutely agree in that 'Son of Man' would correlate to the word 'Adam' however, both of these terms carry a huge volume of other meanings and must be understood based on the context. 

 

The name 'Adam' is defined in the Bible [KJV] for meaning, I think, 'servant of God' [I can't remember for sure]. However, this name carries a whole lot of other word origins and meanings too. In most modern translations, for example, the ancient letter 'h' has been omitted from so many ancient words and this is insanely crucial to understand the significance in the past as opposed to today. Today, that letter may not mean much, but eventually, it will probably surface again and shed much more information about how ancient mankind regarded themselves in terms of being 'a spiritual being' as well as a physical being. The ancient word 'Adam' in some text would have been written as 

 

'Adham' or 'Ahdama' or 'Adamah', and etc. 

 

The Biblical name of Seth, the third son of Adam and Chevah [Eve] is also spelled 'Sheth' in the Bible. The name 'Japheth' is sometimes spelled 'Yapheth'.

Shem is sometimes spelled 'Sem' and Ham is sometimes spelled 'Cham', etc. 

 

But in the Cuneiform script or the Egyptian hieroglyph script, I have no idea how it was translated to Arabic script and the letter 'h' was represented in those scripts. 

For this reason, scholars who translate ancient script would apply ancient script to the earth and some form of scientific confirmation.

So then, the name 'Adam' would also be defined not only as meaning 'Son of Man' or 'Servant of God' but, it would also be defined more complete as meaning 'blood red' in association to the science of 'color' and to the planet earth, as Adam was created from 'the dust of the earth' so says the Bible. 

 

The name 'Cham' would also be defined in association to 'Kemet' or 'Khem' or 'Cham' in association to 'black earth' in the region of Kemet in the land of Egypt and Northeast Africa. The name 'Seth' would also be defined in association to 'Ra' or 'the sun' and in ancient script, this name correlated to 'the South world' or 'Seth world'. 

The name 'Japheth' correlates to the word 'Ja-Petah' or 'Ptah' and 'Egypetah', 'Gupta', etc. and also correlated to 'black earth' or Egypt. 

The name 'Shem' correlated to 'Sem priest' or 'Second born of the priesthood' and also 'Semet' and as a descendant of Seth, like the name 'Japheth' it was actually a title and not the personal name of the Biblical sons of Noah. The personal names of the sons of Noah reveal another deeper level to who these ancient men actually defined. Like most men, their sons were named after their ancestors. So the eldest son, the high priest of Ptah, Japheth, personal or 'Seth name' was 'Kim' and for this reason, many people of the east world, past and present still have this name. You see this name 'Kim' in many people from Korea and the ancient 'Eskimos' and 'Yakima' and etc. Ancient Egypt also has this root name 'Kim' as well. The personal or 'Seth name' for the second son of Noah was how the son of David was identified as this personal went down through the ages. David's son, the Jedi [i.e. Jedidiah] was known as 'Solomon' and his name stems from the personal name of Shem which was Selah [i.e. Salah, Shelah, etc.]. Noah named Shem, after his ancestor; Methuselah and this name refers to 'Peace' or 'Peacemaker'. 

 

The youngest son of Noah, Ham, was named after his father; Lamech [i.e. Mech, reverse script Chem]. 

The name 'Lamech' refers to 'Mecca' or Technology and Ham was defined by this name in association to being 'a Great Builder', etc. 

And there is another 'scientific revelation' that most Black Christian ignore; All three of the sons were actually identical!!! This would be a huge genetic factor that today's scholar know well, but due to White Supremacy, this is kept secret. Even today, the highest rate of identical twins are from Yoruba, and this would be due to the genetics of the Original Adamah of Kemet!!! 

 

So then, all three sons of Noah [i.e. Canoe, Noe, etc.] had Seth names, Kim, Salah, and Lamech. But the time lines shows that they were born in captivity and therefore, they identified by a 'Ca name' such as 'Canoe' as well. Personally, I think that Noah's Seth name was 'Imhotep' because of the exact match in the timelines. However, I have as yet to find a confirmation from anyone else!!! Imhotep build the Great Steppe Pyramid during the time of pharaoh Djoser and that was the exact time that Noah would have been living in Egypt! How else did Noah know how to construct a massive vessel, if he had not been living in Egypt!? Imhotep was the high priest of Djoser and that is exactly what Noah was as well. He was the Most high priest of the living God and he was a master lecturer. He had to have learned those skills in Egypt and he had to have been a master of working with wood and therefore knew how to used 'Cedar wood' [i.e. Gopher wood; Copher wood Coffin wood] or some type of rot resistant wood to construct the massive vessel. 

 

So, this name 'Adam' and the phrase 'Son of Man' has to be regarded in context of whatever script or passage that uses it. The term 'Son of Man' refers to 'Jesus Christ' in the New Testament: 

[3] And as he sat upon the mount of Olives, the disciples came unto him privately,

saying, Tell us, when shall these things be? and what shall be the sign of thy coming,

and of the end of the world?
[4] And Jesus answered and said unto them, Take heed that no man deceive you.
[5] For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many.
[6] And ye shall hear of wars and rumours of wars: see that ye be not troubled:

for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet.

[29] Immediately after the tribulation of those days shall the sun be darkened,

and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven,

and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken:
[30] And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven:

and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see

the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.

ST MATTHEW 24:3- 6, and, 24: 29-30.

 

So, the 'Sign' refers to astronomical date that Biblical Jesus was born of which was scientifically marked byway of an astronomical wonder; the advent of a new star that moved into our solar system. The 'Sign of the Son of Man' means 'the Star of Bethlehem' that Moving Star that came into our Solar System on April 17 about 2000 years ago. So this scripture refers to a prophecy of what has been prophesied to happen immediately after the Tribulation Period. And due to the atmosphere being affected by what some scholars believe will be some type of Ice Age existence due to a Volcanic Winter, the earth will experience some type of climate or heavy cloud coverage that will block the sun for a long time. But when the atmosphere changes and the stars become visible again, then, the planets will be seen again and so, this particular 'Moving star' will move to be near the moon and it will be a sign that the Tribulation Period will come to an end. And so, a long time ago, the ancient Africans and American Indians knew how to look at the stars, planets, etc. and read the skies and could predict certain events, but today, most of us Black folks have been dumbed down and have no clue how to read the skies. All in all, the phrase 'Son of Man' in the New Testament refers to a descendant Adam and Eve, of which would be Jesus Christ, therefore, it makes a whole lot of sense that the term 'Son of Man' would mean 'Adam' but again, a deeper meaning must be understood and todays 'White Jews' or Hebrew translations do not go that deep. Black people need to understand that the ancient scriptures have been misinterpreted and a lot of what we are getting is part-truths; Blasphemy. 

 

10 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

The Hebrew word for man (mature male) is "ish"

 

I've seen this too. A lot of American Indians in the Northwest regions of America are identified by that word; Ishy or something like that.

So I understand this version of humans with this name 'Ishtar', 'Isis', 'Israel', 'Ishmael', etc. Also, the words and names like 'Island', 'Isthmus', 'Sus' as in 'Jesus', 'Susquehanna', 'Susan', 'Shushan', Mississippi', etc. refer to 'water'. 

 

The root term in correlation with the planet earth defines mankind as being in connection to 'water'. Humans are most made up of 90% water, I think that is what scientist report. 

 

 

15 hours ago, frankster said:

said nothing about sails and you said nothing about sails .... You said boats did not exist then.

It then is now evident that you now know that boats existed then.....Pesse and Dufuna

Anyways one does not need boats with sails to get from the Old World to the New World

The first Know use of sails is 6000 yrs ago still before your timeline

 

I have been referencing the use of sails early, but you've been overlooking it because you may not understand the obvious significance in sail technology as proof the earth did not split until very recent in the history of this planet.

15 hours ago, frankster said:

Nevertheless it is a graet link

 

Thank you.

 

15 hours ago, frankster said:

This Timeline is religious scientism

I do not agree with this timelime....Neither does known and accept science

 

All timelines can be confirmed due to astronomy. 

It does not matter what anyone believes when it comes to astronomy and the dating of historical events. 

The Biblical timeline is exact and confirms ancient Egyptian records, ancient Greek records, ancient Chinese records, etc. 

All mound civilizations are dated to begin in the 3000s B.C.

 

The western world governments changed dates and times around the set up of their Colonial empire and today, this is easy to recognize due to such things as the printing press. 

 

Well where did he go!?

He came in the spotlight for a quick minute and then, it seems to me he disappeared just as quickly as he came!

Anyway, I loved his style. 

4 hours ago, ProfD said:

The safest bet is to follow the money.  Geopolitics usually revolves around manipulation & control of resources.

 

I heard the president saying that our gas prices were going to go up and that we depend on 20% of oil coming through the gulf of Hormuz but, how can anyone of us on the bottom of the pyramid believe that the government is telling us all truth? 

 

 

1 hour ago, frankster said:

Of course boats were being used 8000yrs ago....do your research.

Why should I provide further proof while you have not provided any relevant proof

 

No I don't see any thing in history that dates boats that long ago with sails, though, and that would be a key point.

Don't you think?

 

1 hour ago, frankster said:

Cool........your strongest argument yet.

Though I tend to think of that one resulting from the flood....

 

Ancient script does not say that, but it is an interesting thought!  

The date of the flood was exactly 2356 B.C., April 17 and then,

the first time the earth split resulting in Archipelagos was a couple hundreds of years later.

So, I can see one affecting the other.

hmh. Interesting point! 

 

 

On 3/2/2026 at 11:23 PM, ProfD said:

Remains to be seen who will emerge as Iranian leadership. More than likely they will be friendly towards the west & its allies.

 

 

Now, they are saying negative things about his son, the elected leader.

I just can't believe what is happening!

Wow!

 

 

On 3/8/2026 at 5:56 PM, ProfD said:

In other news, Iran has named Mojtaba Khamenei as their new Supreme Leader.

 

Mojtaba is the son of  Ayatollah Ali Khamenei who was recently killed by US airstrike along with 40 members of his leadership circle.

 

Remains to be seen how long the US & Israel will allow Mojtaba Khamenei to stay in power.

 

I do not understand politics on this level.

However, coming to this forum is what I look forward to doing to help me understand better. 

 

On 3/2/2026 at 2:52 AM, aka Contrarian said:

Interesting. Can't help but wonder if any of this astrological activity coincides with Israel and America's violent assault on Iran and what it portends for the future of the great American Empire and the orange tyrant who has crowned himself king of it.

 

I was deliberating whether or not to put a 'laughing emoji' or a 'heart emoji' because this post evoked two simultaneous emotions for me. 

 

 

On 3/5/2026 at 2:06 AM, aka Contrarian said:

 

Apparently, the cloud cover blocked out all the celestial activity in my part of country and I didn't see anything... Very disappointed 

 

Yeah. Me too. The clouds blocked it completely where I am. 

 

 

On this same wise though, there is supposed to be an upcoming celestial event that might be spectacular.

A comet is suppose to come close to the sun in a few weeks and because of it being 'a sun grazer' though, 

it is difficult to know what will happen.

Scientist say that it might explode or if it makes it past the sun, it might become bright enough to see. 

 

20 hours ago, harry brown said:

NAACP.  Black. Lives. Matter.   Black.  Politicians. Black.  Police.  Cannot.  Come. Together. To. Organize.   Neighborhood.   ,Watch.   In. Black.  Communities.  ..NAACP.  Will. Make.  Time.   To. Control.  Black. Votes. .  .Black. Police.  Cannot.  Patrol.   Black.  Communities.   Day.  And   Night.  ?????

 

Yes. Absolutely. 

This is depressing.

 

 

52 minutes ago, ProfD said:

 

 

Otherwise, these topics do make for great discussion/debate.  Carry on.

 

Okay. I agree to a point because humans did record some aspects of it, but the earth is so old and much older than human when they began to record, I understand what you are saying! Thank you!

 

The Biblical script does pinpoint a date and time to be within a ten year time span when the earth did split; according to the Bible.

However, in order to confirm, most scholars know that you need at least two or three forms of references to confirm facts. And so, other than the Biblical script, there would be the ancient Sumerians, Elamites, Egyptians and Chinese that probably recorded something, but this is difficult to obtain today!!! 

 

The lifespan of Peleg, the son of Shem is specific. 

His death and the time that is given when Noah died specifically reveals that the Biblical records puts the time that earth split to be within a ten year time span from the death of Noah and the death of Peleg.

yes, the Biblical script is that exact.

 

Biblical timelines are based on astronomy and that is an exact science.

The western world governments can lie but they cannot lie against astronomy and how are planets are confirmed to move around the sun.

I cannot remember the exact date, because, I lost my notes and need to rely on the exact timelines, but the time span recorded is between the death of Noah and the death of Peleg. And that was a ten year gap. 

 

The history of the Greek Isles is also a major source as well, to regard on this subject.

The western world government reset up of their leagues after the Crusades if part of the confusion, because they deliberately debauched ancient records. 

They changed dates and times.

They caused a lot of Greek history to be regarded as Greek mythology. 

There records about 'the Lost City of Atlantis' is just one example of their deliberate attempt to change historical facts. 

 

 

 

 

On 3/1/2026 at 5:18 PM, Pioneer1 said:

I produced BOTH VERSES and it says NOWHERE about Egypt being "completely overthrown".

You're making stuff up and pinning it on prophecy.

 

Also, all secular script confirms this in that the 18th Dynasty was completely overthrown and came to an absolute end, starting with the death of the last king/pharaoh of that line; King Tut. After Ay and Horemheb died, that was the end of that government.

You simply cannot understand well recorded historical events that confirm this Biblical prophecy. @Pioneer1

 

On 3/1/2026 at 5:18 PM, Pioneer1 said:

You believe in the Bible so bad, and you're trying to INSERT yourself and your people in it.

 

 

LOL. And you believe in White people so bad that you are trying to INSERT history with NO dates and records to prove that they invented script or not. 

You are giving White people credit with no proof. 

Me stating that the Bible states that Moses married a black woman, that David married a Black woman and that Solomon was in love with a Black virgin, is ancient script and has nothing to do with me inserting anything. 
 

 

On 3/1/2026 at 5:18 PM, Pioneer1 said:

 

It's not the same thing...they are two different diseases.

 

 

You are wrong. Moses detailed the same disease of which still exist today, exactly how he has been describe. 

That is a medical condition that still exist today, not matter what word is used. Leprosy still exist today in the same 

way that Moses had it. 

 

 

On 3/1/2026 at 5:18 PM, Pioneer1 said:

Moses prophesied the Transatlantic Slave Ship Trade; trust me, it did not 'already' happen!!! LOL.

 

Show me where?

 

I've shared this countless times. Moses prophesied the Hebrews would go back into Egypt by ships and then become captured in the slave ship trade. Historically, there is only one time that this occurred. No ships could have sailed out of Egypt to be part of any kind of slave ship trade until after the rise of 'Second Rome'. This prophecy is firmly based on technology! LOL. 

 

Everything else you responded to proves my point in that you keep addressing issues that have long been proven to anyone with a basic education. So therefore, by the time of the 3rd/4th generations, prophecy says that judgment will occur and most people who continue to promote White domination will be judged. Like I said earlier, even Moses was stopped from going to 'New Jerusalem' at that time, due to issues with idolatry and Colorism. The people looked up to Moses and when he became arrogant and smote the rock, the Creator allowed the water to come out, but he stopped Moses for that reason. Moses knew that 'the Great Prophet' was coming and would deal with White Supremacy and Colorism. He knew that the Egyptians wanted him to be pharaoh because he was fair skinned, nevertheless, like many people on this earth, whether we are white or black, some of us do not submit to that kind of madness. And Moses loathed those Egyptians and embraced his ethnic origins. Moses knew that Jesus would come one day and deal with the Amorite movement. And when Jesus came, he had nothing to do with the government of the Romans because they were Separatist and White Supremacist. If they came up to him, he obliged them, but Jesus did not come to waste his time with people that he knew rejected the truth. 

 

The Creator used only two humans to people this world today and correct a great sin; just two. So, he doesn't need us. Lol. 

He used only two perfect humans, that he created to correct deformity in this world. Lol. 

And they were both Black skinned humans; Adam and Eve. 

Now, there are more than 8 billion humans in this world today after only about 6000 years. 

 

I believe that; when it comes to religion, yes, it is a complete confusion and I can understand why many of us, Black folk over here, don't give in to that craziness. But, I also believe that in the earlier form, religion was useful. Nevertheless, I don't believe too, that the Creator is concerned if we believe in religion or not, because he has got a whole lot of Africans today in that continent that are religious and they will continue to be religious. Most of those Africans believe that we over here are poisoned by western beliefs and yes, they are too but nevertheless, they will not drop religion altogether. 

 

And so, when these kind of well proven points that you continue to address like such things as the descendants of Abraham being the Chosen people, and the origin of script, and the historical account of the Crusades occurring in the AD 1090s and etc. continues to be addressed, well it only proves that you are still confused and you keep bringing up old news and the younger generations of humans do not need that kind of confusion. Humanity needs to move forward, not backward. Today, most people understand that the Chosen people were not perfect and most people understand what that really means. 

 

 

On 3/1/2026 at 10:16 PM, frankster said:

I ask for Proof of the The split up of Pangea occuring around 5000 yrs ago????

 

On 3/1/2026 at 10:16 PM, frankster said:

You have yet to produce any proof that it only happen less than 5000 yrs ago????

 

On 3/1/2026 at 10:16 PM, frankster said:

Boats were being use 8,000 yrs ago to 50,000 yrs ago

 

On 3/1/2026 at 10:16 PM, frankster said:

I need not try again

You ask for script and I provided ancient script....they are originals real and authentic.

If your christian or western bias precludes you from accepting them as real knowledge....Whether or not you accept those script is up to you.

Never the less they align with current understanding of continental drift

 

On 3/1/2026 at 10:16 PM, frankster said:

I never said the earth split 2 million years ago.....I said the earth split around 300 - 200 million yrs ago

 

On 3/1/2026 at 10:16 PM, frankster said:

What I said was they used boats....And since the first humans to reach the Americas got there well under 25,000 yrs ago - boats were already in use by humans

 

On 3/1/2026 at 10:16 PM, frankster said:

since Seneferu was born around 4600 yrs ago and boats were already around 8,000 yrs ago

 

 

1.  The references I provided are from two top rated university reports; experts and they absolutely are refuting the western reports of the earth splitting millions of years ago. 

They are also absolutely refuting the western world reports about the dates of human presence in the world. The University of Berkeley and the University of Arizona are top ranking worldwide and so, these scientific scholars are refuting your report by the National Geographic society and their old, prepared and outdated report by the western world government. 

 

2.  The references I provided about the mound constructions, etc. are absolute references in that the Pangaea split could not have occurred until after 5000 years ago. 

Pangaea or, the one super earth mass remained until very, very recent and so, the western reports are a complete lie. 

The dates of the mound constructions did not even occur until the 3000s B.C.!!! This means that the earth was one mass until after this time  period!!!

You just simply cannot understand my references. 

@frankster Read up on it yourself. Read about the constructions of the Great Steppe Pyramid, and the mound civilizations in the ancient Americas and ancient China, etc. It was the same technology!!! The information could NOT have occurred and be transferred if the earth had already split into continents. 

I am giving you references with dates and times!!!

3.  Boats were not used 8000 years ago or 50,000 years ago, that is ridiculous. No proof of that at all. Seneferu's famous boat constructed, is a well documented report that reveals the technology of boat constructions became unique at that time period. 

4.  The continental drift has nothing to do with the abrupt time the earth split into continents. When the earth split it was abrupt and violent. It did NOT happen over a long period of time. It was abrupt. And also, it happened after the great deluge. 

The Great World Flood occurred initially, and then the earth split long after that time period. 

According to the Bible prophets, the Great World Flood happened in the 2300s B.C. on April 17. And the earth did not split until long after that time period.

As the ancient Egyptian records also confirm, the Old Pyramid Age ended abruptly and the material used to construct the Giza pyramids ended abruptly.

The new mud brick technology began to be used to construct pyramids right after that time period and this is confirmed world wide, in that the ancient mound civilization ended abruptly AFTER THE EARTH SPLIT!!! 

The mud-brick technology became a new form of construction and this did not happen in the far reaches of the world for ages until humans began to sail with new boat technology and the technology of sails confirm this time period as well. 

 

5.  "I need not try again

You ask for script and I provided ancient script....they are originals real and authentic.

If your christian or western bias precludes you from accepting them as real knowledge....Whether or not you accept those script is up to you.

Never the less they align with current understanding of continental drift"

 

No. It's not my christian or western bias that stops me from accepting lies as real knowledge, again, it's my formal education that refutes your statement about Sanskrit. Again, Sanskrit did not occur until after the Sumerians developed their civilization in Mesopotamia. I was the only student to achieve the highest scores in both of the college classes I took in college that discussed this topic. One class was 'Humanities' and another class was 'Western Civilization' and I think another class was 'Art Appreciation'. Anyway, Sanskrit only addresses history that revolves around India and Hinduism but other languages such as Cuneiform and Biblical script are more advanced because they address civilizations all over the world and other religions such as Buddhism that began in India late in time, and etc. 

Also, the subcontinent of India, actually did not even happen until after the first time the earth spit!!! 

In fact, the subcontinent of India was part of Africa for a long time. This is another well hidden occurrence that has become a confusion due to the lies that this western world has published to hide their movements against Black people of African descent.

 

6.  I am sluggish, and I apologize. I hope to apply myself to sharing more about the cave drawings to add to this topic of how the western world has published false reports about the actual time the earth split in their quest to refute the Bible. However, again, one of the most obvious proofs that the earth did not split until very recent would be [1] the ancient mound civilizations, [2] The Old Pyramid Age, and [3] the technology of ancient boats and ships that changed abruptly due to the need for sails to navigate waterways other than the rivers and seas. But like the other references, the cave drawings also are a major way to reveal the false reports about the earth splitting millions of years ago. Long after this time period of 2 million years, cave drawings occurred and the technology used reveals that humans transferred techniques across land mass. One example would the red ochre used to make some cave drawings in far reaching pats of the world. 

 

Here is one reference from the Biblical script:

 

[17]The sons of Shem; ... [19] And unto Eber were born two sons: the name of

the one was Peleg; because in his days the earth was divided: and his brother's

name was Joktan. 1 CHRONICLE 1: 17- 19.

 

***** My Note; the origin of the word 'Archipelago' is from the son of Shem named Peleg.

So, prior to this time period, there were absolutely no, islands; no archipelagos. The history of the

Greek Isles did not happen until after this time period. 

_________________________________________ 

 

An archipelago is an area that contains a chain or group of islands

scattered in lakes, rivers, or the ocean.Jun 16, 2024

 

https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/archipelago.html#:~:text=An archipelago is an area,%2C rivers%2C or the ocean.

 

 

 

Malay Archipelago, largest group of islands in the world, consisting of the more than 17,000 islands of Indonesia and the approximately 7,000 islands of the Philippines. The regional name “East Indies” is sometimes used as a synonym for the archipelago. 

https://www.britannica.com/place/Malay-Archipelago  

 

 

 

47 minutes ago, ProfD said:

Clive Davis is the same Jew who was behind the late great Phyllis Hyman too. Go figure.

 

OMG! Stop.

 

What a song bird.

I believe she was suppose to have committed suicide?

I'm speechless. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There's A Blood Red Moon About to Appear--

March 3, 2026

 

 

The total lunar eclipse on March 3 will be the last until New Year's Eve 2028

 

 

https://www.space.com/stargazing/lunar-eclipses/the-total-lunar-eclipse-on-march-3-will-be-the-last-until-new-years-eve-2028

 

 

What time is the blood moon total lunar eclipse on March 3?

On 2/20/2026 at 6:49 AM, Pioneer1 said:

In other word, Africans are LESS EVOLVED and CLOSER TO APES!

That's the theory!

Do any of you support that?

 

LOL,

No.

And, I just recently read that Darwin had a relative, I think a cousin that became very famous for starting a major company that supported Eugenics.

I just read that Epstein was obsessed with Eugenics.

 

22 hours ago, ProfD said:

Those short-term benefits Black folks get from being around white folks in their debauchery may  not be worth it in the long run.

 

 

For real!

Oh! And I forgot, Beyonce too!

They are trying to drag her through the mud too for being in association with Epstein.

 

And your statement also makes me think about the late Whitney Houston and Brandi. Both of these girls were supposedly link with some wealthy White Jew who apparently 'discovered them'. This same man also had something to do with PDiddy becoming famous as well. This is so sad. 

 

And speaking of White Jews, or European Jews, I vaguely remember hearing this same thing about Epstein. 

 

Because of what a young White man had said in one of the videos I posted, I decided to do a quick re-look back into Hitler. 

That young man said exactly what I had talked about in another thread about some men being born 'intersexed'. He and a Black man in the video said a lot about that subject regarding Epstein and Hitler!

 

The White young man, WENT OFF! LOL. 

Oh! He said, that 'they' are trying to turn men into ????? LOL. Apparently, Hitler had a problem and so did Epstein in this area. And now, it is all over the media that  Epstein was obsessed with Eugenics just like Hitler. He wanted to produce a master White race and that was why he selected young White girls and etc.

 

Rumor has it too, that Epstein fathered 100 children that are now suing his estate.

Nevertheless, I think that it is difficult for us to believe this because it does not make sense on its face; that he would be deficient in the 'male department' and still want to have sex and create a master race. Go figure. 

 

 

 

 

I was shuffled around a lot when I was young so, I have several memories of going to theaters and enjoying productions.

I remember going to a college theater in Pennsylvania to see 'the Princess and the Pea'.

Then I remember in Va. Beach, Va. my mother taking me to Pembroke Mall theater to see, Cecil B. DeMill's production of 'The Ten Commandments' and how Civil Rights leaders of the day, did not like it that right next door to that movie was a cartoon about 'Tar Baby' [?]. 

In Texas I remember going to the theaters. I saw a thriller 'Carrie', and I think I saw the movie, 'Jaws' and also, 'Billy Joe' or something like that. 

Then in California, I remember going to the theaters and I enjoyed seeing Diana Ross and Michael Jackson in 'the Wiz'. 

Growing up though, it was not a great desire for me to go to the movies, but it was nice sometimes.

But the Black Theater that means the most to me is when I went to college and also auditioned and, to my shock and surprise, I was selected to be in some productions.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It looks so different now! 

The NSU Theater Company, I found out, was big time! I couldn't believe it!

It's been so many years ago that I have to think back to remember how I even got into it.

But it was so fun. But now, it expanded even more!

They are award winning! Crazy.

It is one of the best times of my life. 

The head of the company was very well known, Robert Wynne Jackson and he hired major artist, for instance, once a man from Harlem Theater to train his 

actors and dancers. I auditioned as a dancer. I was in the production, 'Raisin In the Sun' and 'Ain't MisBehavin'. All of his productions were sold out performances. 

It was an insane learning experience for me. Auditions were tough, especially for Ain't MisBehavin because only four dancers were selected and I was the only college student selected. the other three were invited and professional dancers and they intimidated me intensely. I had to learn tap dancing and I had to practice for hours relentlessly. My legs swelled up like crazy. Our costumes were shipped and I had to go to a beauty salon to get finger waves!

 

The third audition the next year was for the production 'Bubbling Brown Sugar' and guess what!? I was pre-selected to be the main character. Lol. But because, I became depressed and went through hard times with my mother and etc. I declined. Mr. Jackson had people come to my home and sent a famous man to try and convince me to be the star, but it was too much for me. I did not want to be a star and have to deal with so much 'behind the scenes' troubles that goes along with being a celebrity. They were very upset, but even today, I have no regrets. I just recently heard about the lovely talk show host, Sherri, and in how her show was just cancelled. At times, she became very emotional on her show and spoke about the things that some of them have to go through to be celebrities and it brought back memories. 

 

Sherri spoke about the recent docu-series about the Supermodel, Tyra Banks, and man are they trying to drag her through the mud!

Some people are saying that Tyra was too hard on Black models, but I disagree. In fact, she did the opposite. Tyra went all out to try and help

Black girls who otherwise would not even have a chance!

That is my opinion. I do see that she went off on one model, but that girl was rough and I think that she should have thought about Tyra before she reacted in the way that she did when she was faced with a conflict, one time, at a bar when a White model poured beer on her hair. That particular Black model said herself, that she was kicked out of her high school for fighting. Yes, she is gorgeous, but her behavior was pretty bad. 

Anyway, I have digressed, but I stopped watching that show years ago though, after Tocarra was eliminated. 

I had no idea it got a bad rap until it came up on my channel recently. 

 

13 hours ago, frankster said:

No...... it is not a "wild guess"

If guess it is ....it is based on science.

 

Prove it. Prove that it is based on science by providing references as to how 'scientist' have confirmed this.

I just posted 2 references from colleges that say otherwise; Berkeley and University of Arizona. Scientist have already stated the problems with 

carbon dating and other past methods used to date events that have happened in this earth. 

 

13 hours ago, frankster said:

Bones and  tools make up the some of the evidence

 

Not so. Bones and tools, hence archaeological findings does not at all make up any evidence as to this topic about the earth splitting millions of years ago.

Archaeology is based on humanity in relations to the tools they used and so, this would completely contradict your beliefs in that the earth split millions of years ago.

 

13 hours ago, frankster said:

How do you know that?

What is the methodology you used?

 

I just provided you the references!

 

13 hours ago, frankster said:

They used Boats...sailed

 

LOL. You are making up stuff! Based on archaeology, there is no proof of any boats sailing 2 million years ago! 

Your reference is Sanskrit!!!

That writing came after the Black Babylonian script!!! Sanskrit [i.e. Samskrit] is actually based on Babylonian cuneiform script. Try again. 

 

"If you know of cave paintings that can date the splitting of the One single Landmass into several Continents....please present?"

 

I fell asleep when I was reading up on this, but cave paintings definitely prove 'one landmass' was still the case for a very long time and that people roamed the earth when it was one super continent until very recent. The earth did not split 2 millions years ago and I already several valid references to prove this point. 

The mound constructions, cave paintings, foot prints in ancient New Mexico, etc. are solid proofs published by experts from reputable scientist in that the earth did not split 2 miilion years ago. 

 

I studied many years ago, in college, about this subject, so this is an obsession for me. 

There were no boats 2 million years ago that can be dug up. 

It was not until very late, at the time of Seneferu that archaeologist know of that prove even at that time the earth had not split.

Boat and ship technology has been well proven that they were constructed at specific times to sail and trade up and down the river systems and the seas. 

Ocean going ships with sails and the materials used to make ancient sails is well dated.

No. The earth did not split 2 million years ago. That is just a prepared statement by western leaders and that have been proven to be as such by scientist today, even here in the western civilization. 

 

9 minutes ago, ProfD said:

 

 

In real-time, we are witnessing the lengths to which white folks will go to cover up their debauchery especially when rich & powerful folks are involved.

 

Ha! Yes, it is sick.

They are targeting Whoopi Goldberg and Naomi Campbell and even Michael Jackson's name is being disrespectfully thrown around.

Can you believe that!!!

I am not saying that the Black women are guilty or not, but it is obvious that this is evil and sick to turn the lights on them. 

I believe the recent news still may be just rumors, but a few reports say that Whoopi Goldberg was in the government files and that she has been temporarily 

suspended from being on her show.

I also heard that back when Epstein was released from jail, Naomi Campbell invited him to her party and that while he was serving time, she continued to 

support him and send him correspondence. 

As for Michael Jackson, there is absolutely nothing negative that 'they' can link him too regarding that creepy man. 

 

 

On 2/22/2026 at 1:02 PM, aka Contrarian said:

Although the family's request for him to lie in state at the Capitol rotunda was denied, his casket will be trotted out at 4 different venues in Chi-Town and DC, finally being laid to rest in his South Carolina birthplace.

In embellishing his acquaintance with Jesse, Trump called him "a piece of work".  Take's one to know one...

                    RIP Jesse.

 

What a disrespectful thing for Trump to say.

I did not know that Rev Jesse Jackson was from South Carolina, that is news to me.

May he RIP