Jump to content

Chevdove

Members
  • Posts

    1,359
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    66

Everything posted by Chevdove

  1. I responded to this but my response did not submit, now I am tired. so I will be brief and respond later in more depth. @Pioneer1 The proper word would not be 'worlds' in this context. Perhaps it would be 'governments'. Can two opposing governments dwell together at the same time on the same planet. The government of the Great Adversary is distinct from the government of the Creator and here are a few distinctions: [1] The government of the Great Adversary is MARKED by it being A MATRIARCHAL GOVERNMENT, but it's deceptive in nature and appears as a patriarchal government. There are many positive Matriarchal governments though. But the government of Satan is based on him being INTERSEXED and he cannot produce a viable male individual. So his government deceptively appeals to the Government of the Creator and then attacks. He loathes malefactors and therefore the presence of Homosexuality is a mark of his government. The priesthoods overtime have always been deceptively appealed to in this manner. The system of the Adversary has continually infiltrated the priesthood and then introduce homosexuality of which has its origins in pedophile actions. the government of God is A PRIESTHOOD and is based on his creation of a viable male individual. the Great Adversary loathes a priesthood government. [2] The government of the Great Adversary is 'a world government' --- AN EMPIRE GOVERNMENT--however it took thousands of years to form beginning with the start of the ROMAN EMPIRE. The Roman republic transformed into the Roman Empire with its first movement; TO TAX THE WORLD LUKE 2:1-2 And it came to pass in those days, that there went out a decree from Caesar Augustus, that all the world should be taxed.[2] (And this taxing was first made when Cyrenius was governor of Syria.) World domination. That is the government of the Great Adversary. However, the Government of God is not a world government, but A KINGDOM government, meaning ii is based on INHERITANCE. An inheritance that begins with the original individual from Africa... [3] The government of the Great Adversary is based on Colorism. but the government of God is not... [4] The government of the World/Satan is based on Human Sacrifice, but the Kingdom of God is not... Empire government vs Kingdom styled government... I think this is what @daniellegfny might be addressing when he said that Jesus will come into His kingdom.
  2. What does the 'end of the world' mean to you? The Nebiim prophets [Apocalyptic prophets] wrote in detail that world judgment which would be the very END of End Times would mark the beginning of world judgment. So, End times began at the start of the Roman Empire but goes way beyond that time up to the formation of this spiritual Babylonian empire government. ... which forms out of a 7-government system--7 headed beast. End Times is a long concept. This world judgment 'end times' will not occur in one day--24 hours. The Great Babylonian city will not be destroyed COMPLETELY in one day. The prophets write that this powerful government will be destroyed beginning with a meteor storm and go through other series of catastrophic occurrences. And they further write that world judgment will begin to occur. Many people called it 'JUDGMENT DAY' but in the book of Daniel, the JUDGMENT DAY does not occur in one day, but A TIME AND A SEASON. So it is a JUDGEMENT PERIOD not A Judgment Day. The prophet Isaiah also wrote about after this 1000+ year judgment period... A TIME AND A SEASON that means 1000 + 90 = 1090 years. So the world judgment will take another 1000+ years after the great Babylonian city will be destroyed.
  3. @Pioneer1 2 PETER 1:20 Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation. DANIEL 12:9 And he said, Go thy way, Daniel: for the words are closed up and sealed till the time of the end. DANIEL 12:4 But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased. In the Book of DANIEL this is revealed. In the first vision of End Times that Daniel had and wrote about, Daniel writes that the he saw an image of a man with hair white like wool, etc. and specifically describes him in relation to the Star of Bethlehem; I need to relook at that scripture to be exact, though. HOWEVER, years later, he had another vision about the END TIMES and he saw the same 'man' that spoke to him before. But this time 'In Chapter 12' Daniel writes that the man was dressed in LINEN CLOTH; and this would be a confirmation to Daniel's vision that was indeed JESUS THE CHRIST; he was dressed in his CRUCIFIXION linen-- a deep prophecy about what was going to happen in the future. ALL of the prophets confirm each other, for the prophet ISAIAH wrote in detail about the same prophecy of the coming of JESUS and that he would be crucified by an evil government. "Did it say Moses spoke with The CREATOR face to face, or did he speak with Yahweh (Yahuah translated as "The Lord" in the Bible) face to face? Some would argue that the Being referred to as Yahweh is not the same as The CREATOR" In the Bible, both the Creator and the name Yahweh correlate to each other. This is written about numerous times and explained repeatedly. There are different script forms of the name of the CREATOR and each separate term may describe more detail about the aspect and nature of the Creator. For example, when Moses said, 'whom shall I say to the people that you are?' The reply was to say 'I am that I am' and further on, the Creator explains that the Hebrews did not know him by this name JEHOVAH and further explains that name refers to his nature as A GOD OF WAR and with an outstretched arm, he will war and fight for and deliver his people. So under the name JEHOVAH many of the KINGS of Israel and Judah incorporated the root name of the Creator in their personal name such as JEHOSHAPHAT, and YEHOSHUAH [ie Joshuah], and JEHOAHAB, etc. because it is associated with being a WARLORD. Kings are defined as secondary priest and many used this name because a secondary priest were also warlords and/or peacemakers. However, the High Priesthood such as Isaiah and Jeremiah, had root name endings 'AH' ['Ah' meaning 'of the LORD' as you also wrote]... No way! All the prophets wrote about certain aspects of THE REDEMPTION PLAN OF GOD for the world. And the major Nebiim prophets wrote that end times and beyond. No way! Again, today, there is no private interpretation but we need to study and research to gain an understanding. I too understand that prophecy and what we endure now is frustrating! But @Pioneer1 you left religion and now then what do you believe in!? This world? What this world has to offer us now!? What does 'end times' mean to you? The prophets do write about Jesus coming back--THE SECOND COMING and their prophecies are in part detailed, however, you are right in tht they also write that no one knows exactly when this will actually occur. Jesus said that [paraphrasing] if people knew that the thief was going to come and rob them, then they would prepare, but if you want to go to this new future civilization, you need to live in peace now, because if you have a bad spirit now, then you will always be negative.' Sin and deception needs to manifest first.
  4. @Pioneer1 The Creator conveys messages to his creation in the Bible, through many verses and also in so many other ways!!!--And there is no way to EXACTLY give you EXACT scriptures in certain situations. We as humans CANNOT think in the way of the Supreme Being and we can understand what he wants us to understand but how we transfer our individual experiences to others is another unique concept!!! The Bible expounds upon this idea in many ways as well. Moses wrote that the Creator speaks to us in many formats such as parables, visions, etc. and many more ways, however, he specifically said to the people at tht time of the Exodus, that Moses was the only human being that he spoke with face to face. No Way!!! Not today. The scriptures say that THERE IS NO PRIVATE INTERPRETATION OF THE BIBLE TODAY. TODAY, all of the SEALS of God have been opened!!! What does this scripture mean? It means that there was a time in the past that God had his prophets SEAL UP THE SCRIPTURES, meaning, that they wrote in such a way that the certain people could not understand what was being conveyed until God was ready for it to be revealed. The scriptures detail that by the time of the Crucifixion all of the seals had been opened so now, we live in a time where if we research and study the scriptures, we should come to an understanding. And now, I will give you an example: In the book of DANIEL, the prophet Daniel wrote that he spoke to the Holy Spirit and told him, that he did not understand completely what was being conveyed to him. However, the Holy Spirit [which was actually Jesus Christ at this time] told Daniel, that it was not for him to fully understand at this time. Daniel was frustrated by his vision. Nevertheless, the Holy Spirit told him, to write down his vision, and to "GO THY WAY DANIEL, SEAL UP THE VISION, and at the end times, all will be completely revealed." Now, today after the Crucifixion, Daniel's vision has been completely revealed! And furthermore, the time of the Crucifixion MARKS the BEGINNING OF THE END TIMES. Many people are not aware of this. Many think that today is the end times, but no. The End Times actually began 2000 years ago. Oh gosh! We are going in circles. @Pioneer1 Yes, they are much older, however, at the Berlin Conference, those countries were divided up as all of the the entire continent of Africa had been at that time and were defined as NATIONS by a new standard in the 19th century to serve the purposes of the Western leagues of nations. LEAGUE OF NATIONS!!! ----- League of NATIONS!!! ----- League of NATIONS!!! ------ League of NATIONS!!!!! ------ NATIONS----- NATIONS!!!!! Oh! okay. I didn't realize that was being conveyed.
  5. Yes, I did! But I'd forgotten about it because it was never well broadcasted and kept in the media. That is shameful too, because the late Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. is continually honored and therefore, the death of his mother should also be brought out too much more. I remember reading about King on my own, and I learned some amazing history that is not mentioned in media. But then, after all of the hype about Obama, I noticed how, even King's legacy was silenced. I remember people wearing t-shirts with Obama and King pictured but then after Obama won, 'no more King'. He almost completely disappeared. Nevertheless, before Obama, the whole world knew of King, Malcolm and the Civil Rights Movement, and no matter what, that history will still surface. I hated the way, King was used to shift Black people over to support Obama.
  6. Oh My Gosh! Really!? @Pioneer1 That is terrible. My Brother-in-law is Jamaican! Therefore, some of my nephews are Jamaican! And pretty boys too! Well, I won't listen to that crap. Those Jamaican track girls are some of my all time favorites!
  7. This is the earlier version when he was younger. His voice doesn't seem as deep as the later version, imo. However, it is the version that I fell in love with and the one in the movie:
  8. LOL @Pioneer1 Do you know how old I am!? For real though, I am just beginning to do a life style adjustment and I have done a little aerobics and it feels good!
  9. LOL! Guess what!? It was English! @Pioneer1 As I wrote earlier, I listened to the song over and over again, but never even understood one word! Than after so many times of listening, I heard the radio announcer in the movie say, "Desmond Dekker" and "ISRAELITES" and then, I listened afterwards, and sure enough, then I heard the word "Israelites"! LOL. At first, I thought the singer was a European woman, but later, I thought, no, it's a black woman. It was only after I researched that I realized it was a Black Jamaican man! Desmond Dekker. And I didn't realize it was REGGAE! Now, I want to listen to more Reggae and also research it. I just love that song. You know what: I think that Dollar Tree and Dollar General are owned by one company; they may have merged. I agree, I think that Family Dollar and Dollar General are too cluttered! Dollar General has a aisle for items for a dollar, and I like that aisle! Sometimes though, especially during the busy holidays, I like to go to those two stores more so than Walmart because I can get in and get out faster. But they can be more expensive!
  10. Oh WOW! @Pioneer1 I just read the interchange and I understand exactly was @daniellegfny conveyed! As I said previously, those terms are interchangeable, and more importantly, the history of those 3 countries are too extensive to capture in one term. In ancient Egypt, Libya and Ethiopia, there were DEFINITELY time periods where 'nations' formed but NOT AT ALL like the 19th century 'Nations' that were formed under the Western Leagues that carved up Africa for their benefit. The Bible as 'The Book of LIfe' may not agree with what you believe, however, that root word is factual and does apply. This concept you have problems with however, it does correlate to other ancient 'books' as well such as the Egyptian 'Book of the Dead'; these are concepts that you need to get a bigger view in order to understand the whole scope. LOL! Uh! Yes, the definition is variable because of the written works that covers thousands of years! There is no 'nailing' down one single term! Anyway, you asked me to give you some links to the definition of the word 'Bible' and so, even though you say that you don't believe in the Bible, I will give you some links that you requested: The Bible Noun 1. 1. The Christian scriptures, consisting of the Old and New Testaments. “verses from the Bible” bible definition - Google Search ______________________________ What does the word Bible mean literally? The word bible does not mean book—it means library, from the Latin Biblicum, akin to the German Bibliothek-library. … Bible actually means literally library, not book. Aug 26, 2021 Bible | Definition of Bible by Merriam-Webster https://www.merriam-webster.com > bible ______________________________ The Bible takes its name from the Latin Biblia (‘book’ or ‘books’) which comes from the Greek Ta Biblia (‘the books’) traces to the Phoenician port city of Gebal, known as Byblos to the Greeks. Bible – World History Encyclopedia ______________________________ What are the meanings of Bible? The English word Bible is derived from Koine Greek: …, romanized: ta biblia, meaning “the books” (singular …, biblion). The word … itself had the literal meaning of “scroll” and came to be used as the ordinary word for “book”. Bible - Wikipedia The Bible (from Koine Greek …, ta biblia, ‘the books’) is a collection of religious texts, writings, or scriptures sacred in Judaism, Samaritanism, Christianity, Islam, Rastafari, and many other faiths. It appears in the form of an anthology, a compilation of texts of a variety of forms that are all linked by the belief that they ae collectively revelations of God. These texts include theologically-focused historical accounts, hymns, prayers, proverbs, parables, didactic letters, admonitions, essays, poetry, and prophecies. Believers also generally consider the Bible to be a product of divine inspiration. Bible - Wikipedia No. I meant, that 'like you stated to ; in that I agree with you in that the Hebrew Israelites strongly believe in the Bible'. I definitely did not mean that you believe in the Bible.
  11. THE ISRAELITES-- Song by Desmond Dekker and the Aces-- I heard this song a few weeks ago on a dvd I bought for one dollar from a local Dollar Tree store. I loved the movie, it was awesome. And this song was at the beginning of the movie. At first, I did not understand the lyrics at all, but it just stuck in my mind and I found myself listening to it over and over again. The film was a UK film called "Made in Daghenam" and it's based on a true story set at the time this song became very popular. I loved that movie so much, I have watched over and over again! Finally after hearing that song at the beginning of the movie, I finally heard and understood, the word "Israelites" and I thought, WOW! I know that certain Jamaicans especially the Rastas and other people of the West Indies identify themselves as Israelites and the fact that this song became a big hit in the UK and even here in America amazes me. This song is so famous that it was remade a couple of times decades later. Again, this song was so popular that Desmond Dekker performed this Reggae song many times before he died. And, it became popular in many other countries across the world. Desmond Dekker Ha! And when I researched this song, I found out that Desmond Dekker knew Bob Marley and he was one of the first Jamaicans to become popular for Reggae. Also, I found out that I was not the only one to not understand what the lyrics expressed! There were reports of how the meaning was mis-understood. Desmond wrote this song based on the experiences of the Jamaicans of that time period: the single was the first UK reggae #1 and among the first to reach the US top ten (peaking at #9).[3] It combined the Rastafarian religion with rude boy concerns,[4] to make what has been described as a "timeless masterpiece that knew no boundaries".[5] The title has been the source of speculation,[8] but most settle on the Rastafarian Movement's association with the Twelve Tribes of Israel. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israelites_(song) "Israelites" was one of the first truly international Ska hit singles, peaking at #9 in the US and #1 in the UK. There were fears that Dekker's heavy Jamaican accent on the recording would limit international appeal as listeners would find it difficult to understand the lyrics, and indeed jokes abound about the many mis-hearings of the lyrics of the song. "Get up in the morning, slaving for bread sir" was misheard as "Get up in the morning, baked beans for breakfast" for example, and comedian Lenny Henry famously joked about how many people thought the "ooh, mi Israelites" line was actually "oooh, mi ears are alight"! Despite this and indeed because of the humor from the misheard lyrics, the song became a huge hit singl… Israelites by Desmond Dekker - Songfacts More about the song, THE ISRAELITES, written by Desmond Dekker: The Israelites were the inhabitants of Israel descended by Jacob. The word can also be used to describe one of God’s chosen people. Dekker uses the meaning in this later context, as he sings about his struggles while repeatedly invoking the term. Israelites by Desmond Dekker - Songfacts Again, the movie that played this song in the beginning is based on a true story about women machinist working for the Ford Industry in UK and became so popular that it became a musical as well:
  12. THE ISRAELITES-- I heard this song at the beginning of a $1.00 dvd I bought at the Dollar Tree and at first, I did not really understand the lyrics at all, but it just stuck in my mind and I found myself wanting to hear it over and over again. The dvd film was awesome too! It's a UK film called "Made in Daghenam" and it's based on a true story set at the time this song became very popular. I loved that movie so much, I have watched over and over again! Finally after hearing that song at the beginning of the movie, I finally heard and understood, the word "Israelites" and I thought, WOW! I know that certain Jamaicans especially the Rastas and other people of the West Indies identify themselves as Israelites and the fact that this song became a big hit in the UK and even here in America amazes me. https://youtu.be/HA1ZRIQuHy4
  13. I did not get to watch much of the Olympics, but I did here in the news that one of my favorites, Allyson Felix faired very well! Also, another of my all time favorites, the Jamaican track star, Shelly Anne Fraiser-Pryce did well! Her teammate took the gold Herah and is now known as the fastest women on the track field! And she put the propaganda of Sha'carri to rest. A few days later all of the track stars competed in the Prefontaine classic and Sha'carri came in dead last.
  14. Ha! Absolutely. Ha! Well, that does sound crazy, but guess what!? They are saying this in a strange sort of way but yeah, there are many other people who say this about not only King James, but that whole entire family line!!! However, they use other terminology than this group of Hebrew Israelites. Like @Troy I believe the street preaching group use a lot of propaganda to push their message, and like you @Pioneer1 I believe that that group strongly believe in the Bible, however, I also think that we African American DOS have been miseducated and sort of dumbed down about the reality of the presence of the millions and millions of Hebrew Israelites and Jews that have been scattered all over the world. I doubt the late Nipsey Hussle and his family would have much to do with this group of street preachers. Now if they were to be like Nipsey 'Ermias Joseph Asheghdom' and are able to get the attention and financial support of the very president/leader of Eritrea as Nipsey did, then they would become more significant. If they were to get the attention of certain significant governments of the Original Hebrew Israelites in existence today, like the Eritreans and the original Jews who are part of Ethiopian government today, then they would become significant. But right now, most of the Original Hebrew Israelites in the western world are constantly here and in the West Indies, etc. under attack and are too divided to be counted seriously.
  15. lol. Well @Pioneer1 Maybe I am not sure how to answer you as I thought I did. But I will try to explain in another way: Egypt, Ethiopia and Libya were "invented" YES--as a unique NATION in the 19th century, but prior to this time, they were not known as nations, but by other descriptions. In the past, the countries of Egypt, Ethiopia and Libya were defined by other standards and were not carved up to be 'an arm' of the Western Leagues of nations. Their history is way too long to explain as being 'one country' though. "That's not true! The Bible is a compilation of many, many separate books written by different authors over the course of thousands of years" "Two things can be right at the same time. The Bible IS a book..and the Bible is COMPOSED of many different books." Yes, in this case, both are true. Again, 'The Bible' is a compilation of many books written by different authors over the course of thousands of years. The book of REVELATIONS was written by John, the Revelator during the time period of abt A.D. 90 during the Roman Empire times. So, whatever John was educated in script form was the language that he scripted to write his revelations. He definitely would not have written his book in any form of ancient Egyptian script at the time of the Roman Empire! He would not have written his book in any ancient Kemetic script form either. "Finally....a question answered! So the Book of Revelations was NOT written in Egyptian ancient Kemetic script. Now we're getting somewhere." "So are you suggesting that John wrote the book of Revelations in Greek or Roman?" Yes. WHAT!??? LOL! "Yes. The Bible contains about 27 books of the New Testament. If was dated back to the Exodus as you claim...that means that the New Testament books would have had to have been written atleast that far back too." No. the authors of the New Testament did not live that far back in time. Oh! That is the problem with using only one reference source! "Well right now I'm using YOU as a reference....what is YOUR definition of "Bible"??? And can you please show me or give me a link to what YOU are calling "The Bible"." Okay, I will look for a link. But my definition of 'Bible' would pertain to the root word of it, 'BIB' which refers to 'LIFE', like the word BIBLIOGRAPHY. The Bible is 'a Book of Life' and also define within it contexts as THE WORD OF THE LIVING GOD. It is also a compilation of the Word of God byway of the prophets of God of whom through divine inspiration wrote. And it has been translated out of the original tongue and languages into the languages used at perspective times. Finally, IMO, the only translations that matter would be the ones authorized by the head government because it will be that government that God will judge for their works by the Word of God at the third and fourth generation. Like, Egypt was judged, the empire governments were judged, therefore, this government will ultimately be judged based on the KJV because that was the translated version appointed under that government. however, the Bible is a compilation of many, many separate books written by different authors over the course of thousands of years. For example Solomon wrote the Book of Eccleisiates [sp?] and he lived during the 900s bc. It is a separate book. Then Jeremiah wrote his books over a hundred years later after Solomon; I think he wrote his book abt 700s BC. Then Nehemiah wrote his book over a hundred years later after Jeremiah, I think abt 400s BC during the Persian Empire times, etc. ???? Well how do you reconcile THAT statement you just made with the one you made on Posted July 23: Again, the Bible was dated at the time of the EXODUS abt 1400s BC; it was written in the Egyptian script and language of that time period NOT European. Which is it? Was the Bible written over thousands of years including up to and past 400 BC? Or was it dated at the time of the Exodus of around 1400s BC? The Bible was defined back then in the 1400s BC as 'the Word of God' or 'The Pentateuch' or 'the holy scroll'... That was how it was defined. By the time that the Levites compiled Solomons writings which was after he died, after the 900s BC, 'the Word of God' still may not have been known by the term 'BIBLE', rather it was termed 'THE WORD OF GOD' or 'the Holy Scroll'. Then by the time the Jews were a part of the empire systems, more writings of their ancient priesthood was collected and added to the 'holy scroll' and soon, the writings/books were made into 'SCRIPTURES', so therefore, 'the Bible' became known by other terms such as 'THE HOLY SCRIPTURES' by this time... Now today, we know it as THE BIBLE. Certain Holy Scriptures or Holy Books written by the earliest prophets such as Moses was dated around the 1400s BC, Solomon's books were dated to his lifetime around the 900s BC and so forth. lol
  16. Me either. I did not hear anything about water polo and did not even know it was an olympic sport. But now, I want to find a video of it and watch it. Amazing!
  17. I don't believe I do that. I don't know about that, specifically. I do feel that, again, there is some truth to it though. But I don't believe that drugs have altered the brain to a great degree 'alone'. I feel that there are so many other factors as well, that have been a negative affect on Black people, and some of it has been brought about by our own actions as well.
  18. @Pioneer1 It's about nation building and yes, during the 19th century, 'the countries' in Africa were actually divided up into 'nations'! So, Ethiopia, Egypt and Libya are ancient countries with a lot of history, but during the 19th century the continent of Africa was carved up into nations. No! LOL. That's not true! The Bible is a compilation of many, many separate books written by different authors over the course of thousands of years. Again, 'The Bible' is a compilation of many books written by different authors over the course of thousands of years. The book of REVELATIONS was written by John, the Revelator during the time period of abt A.D. 90 during the Roman Empire times. So, whatever John was educated in script form was the language that he scripted to write his revelations. He definitely would not have written his book in any form of ancient Egyptian script at the time of the Roman Empire! He would not have written his book in any ancient Kemetic script form either. However the other books were written by authors in distinct script formats at the time that they lived. WHAT!??? LOL! @Pioneer1 'Nations' versus 'kingdoms'! African kingdoms... and also other terms like 'African countries' are distinct terms that are used perhaps interchangeably to define different aspects of African history over a long period of time. Yes! YESSSSS! You have refreshed my memory! Oh! That is the problem with using only one reference source! All of the BOOKS in the Bible compilation are sectioned into 'scriptures', however, the Bible is a compilation of many, many separate books written by different authors over the course of thousands of years. For example Solomon wrote the Book of Eccleisiates [sp?] and he lived during the 900s bc. It is a separate book. Then Jeremiah wrote his books over a hundred years later after Solomon; I think he wrote his book abt 700s BC. Then Nehemiah wrote his book over a hundred years later after Jeremiah, I think abt 400s BC during the Persian Empire times, etc. Then the Septuagint was translated works of those ancient 'scriptures'/books around the 300s BC during the Greek Empire times of the Ptolemies...
  19. Oh yes! You've brought out many points and I don't know if I agree with everything, but I certainly believe that we lost the family structure and we do have a responsibility too, for how things have gotten worse. Oh Man! I hope that you remember this when we debate in other forums! LOL! @Pioneer1 I don't know anything about the MMR being a conspiracy or not, however, I do believe that this system has conspired against African Americans to some degree.
  20. @Troy Thank you. Yes. I am familiar with this book and research and it's pretty thorough on the subject! Yes!!! yes, right again. Come on! @Pioneer1 EGYPT, Africa. Again, the Bible was dated at the time of the EXODUS abt 1400s BC; it was written in the Egyptian script and language of that time period NOT European. The Greeks [White rulers over Egypt] had the 70 Hebrews translate their own script abt 200s BC which was over a thousand years later after it was originally scripted. You know this. Yes!!!
  21. Okay now! @Pioneer1 You are ridiculous.
  22. WOW! That was awesome! Man! No, I don't think a high school gymnast could pull that off! that was amazing and I really enjoyed watching. Thank you for posting. I could watch Cathy Rigby perform that over and over again. It seems flawless and her skills were incredible. I wonder what she is doing now. Yes, I agree about the equipment that is use today to assist gymnast today. Me too. @Pioneer1 I agree with @Troy about equipment used to assist in certain feats, but today, these gymnast seem to be executing feat much more intense.
×
×
  • Create New...