Chevdove

I'm late! WOW! That is an awesome picture!!! Absolutely agree.

Yep. Sounds like a contradiction to me. On the one hand, this government allows parents to tell their little children what they are going to be as far as gender and then the law is set up to protect this decision in the public schools. But on the other hand, if children, who are affected by this social media and government and parents, secretly at their parents unaware, go to school and shoot up the place, this government grabs the parents and blame them and then punish them. It is hard to believe that a parent would want their children to do that. Why would this government think that it is okay for a parent to have the right to tell their little sons or daughters that they are going to be a certain gender even if they are born the opposite gender? That seems like completely wrong to me. It should be a protected human right that a female be taught about females being born to give birth and have sex with a male and be responsible for the birth to be the initial nurturers to the very babies they give birth to. etc. It seems obvious that little boys, who are born anatomically with Straight Y-DNA to be taught what can happen when they get older and their balls drop and then they can impregnate a female. They should be taught responsibility and the roles that they would need to exhibit as far as being responsible for the births that will come of such inter-course with a female. They can't have children from having sex with another male? Therefore, this human right of being born male should be a legally protected 'responsibility' of the government to teach little males about their genetics. This American government is a confusion imo. Really!? weird!

Yes. *In Sodom and Gomers' other cities like Sodomy and Gomorrah, existed the presence of the Amorites *In Rome, well that is what they were; the Amorites *In the First Babylon, that is who came to infiltrate and then dominate over the Babylonians; the Amorites and their Amalekite traders, the Celts. *In Egypt, the 18th Dynasty were definitely the presence of the Amorites and their Baal and Ashtoreth religion; the Aten Religion. [12] And when the sun was going down, a deep sleep fell upon Abram; and, lo, an horror of great darkness fell upon him. [13] And he said unto Abram, Know of a surety that thy seed shall be a stranger in a land that is not theirs, and shall serve them; and they shall afflict them four hundred years; [14] And also that nation, whom they shall serve, will I judge: ... ... [16] But in the fourth generation they shall come hither again: for the iniquity of the Amorites is not yet full. GENESIS 15: 12-14, 16. Sodomites, pedophiles... predators on the Black African peoples; the priesthood of the living God. Gotta get those Negroes to accept diversity as being equal and inclusive whereby little black boys are molested and allowed to grow up thinking that it is okay to be molested and told by your parents that you are going to be homosexual, or Trans, etc. Thanks a lot Obama. smh. So, 400 years before the Plague destroyed those pharaoh's Aten Religion, the Creator already rejected them. In 1776, these modern day Amorites, Separated Church and State and broke off from the Crown to keep their Chattel Slavery law and then set up their two-party government... As if God did not know they were going to do it. LOL.

Exactly!

Yes. Collateral damage. I think it's much more than 'collateral damage'. That is the intent--to scapegoat their issues and blame it on non-white folks. In defense of those evangelical Black Christians that worship White Jesus, I don't think they are much different from the ones that worship the democratic leaders. It's seems obvious that we were deceived into the White form of Christianity though but, for the few Blacks that are not obsessed with White people, it is obvious that Jesus was 'a Black African man' who detested White Supremacy. Any Black person who is not obsessed with Europeans can see that from the beginning, scriptures reveal that God, the Creator elevated Moses because of his Black wife, and David because of his Black wife and Jesus elevated Simon the Black [Simon Peter] to kick against the Roman loving Jews. Jesus had nothing to do with the Gentiles, at all. So now, after 2000 years, we should not be alarmed even though the idols of Jesus is erected from Virginia to California in the image of a Gentile; a Roman, even though Jesus had nothing to do with them. Black people are just as obsessed with White people as White racist themselves, hence the reason why Jesus was executed in the first place. That DEI Movement that the Democratic Party has been aligned to includes the Black Church and so now, this 22-year old that just killed Kirk, and his agenda has now been conveniently shifted onto Blacks being blamed for his actions as well. smh. His parents were staunch Republicans from what i heard but he began to have a relationship with a male who is Trans. The prophet Daniel will cringe when he finds out that his description of the DEI Beast of the future Second Rome is not aligned with Negroes. LOL. That Diverse Beast that accepts well, everything, even pedophiles are defended by the Church. lol. That democratic party. Thanks a lot Obama. DEI-- Diversity Equity & Inclusion

Yes, very few I would believe are hybrids, but for the most part all humans are 'modern humans' meaning homo sapiens with genetic sharing that reveal there was intermixing with primitive humans. the 3/5ths percentage is a deception. That law was based on the two-thirds conflict initially. All of the history behind this 3/5ths law is based on the ancient and historical two-thirds definition. And why should it matter what Europeans consider? That is the very problem with the Black world; we are born into sin of which means, we are born and conditioned to worship Europeans even though they lie so much. If we are human NO, we are not all AFricans due to hybridization that did occur very early in our manifestation. Yes, human populations is distinct apart from speciation. Not true. But go ahead and put a reference. There is NO science that connects an anatomically straight Y-DNA Haplogroup to any female origin.. That is just non existent. All Mall haplogroups originate from ONE individual male origin. Some female genetics prove that some females are definitely much older though, that anatomically straight males. lol. Yall are making up stuff! Go ahead. Put a reference if you can. Anatomically straight Y-DNA has never been linked to being female- at all-- for one major reason-- Male organs. a Female genetics cannot produce any androgen at all. lol. No. that is not what I am saying at all. i am referring to MUTATION. Yes. @Troy I read this in textbooks. It is redundant. Not all human species emerged from Africa. Not at all. One clue is the RH Negative factor. Primitive humans are not from Africa because, one major reason is that Africa did not exist as 'a continent' when they roamed this earth in the first place. Symbolic perhaps, but genetically, as you once shared; Caucasians are originally Negroes. Cauca-Asians or Original 'Brown' Negroes that were obsessed with White Supremacy engaged in intermixing.

LOL! It's not that simple. History and Science have to be regarded to understand how humans are classified and defined by ethnicity and cultural groups, etc. Also, some humans have other types of blood factors that is not specific to Africans and reveals the presence of another 'being'. Historical records show that the ancient Assyrians did not regard themselves as being African or Egyptian. The ancient Romans certainly did not define themselves as being 'Africanus' in anyway. The Medes of Medo-Persia did not define themselves as being African even though they dominated over certain countries in Africa and certain African peoples, and intermixed with them too. Hybridization is just one aspect of how humans and animals can be distinct even though their was an original type. Yeah, but that was not their land of origin. They originated somewhere else. Correct. Today, scientist are trying to use bits and pieces of genetic material to try and isolate genetic material and find out what happened to the male DNA because Neanderthals are NOT anatomically straight males. They are androgynous. They have genetic material though, that proves they were intersexed. For this reason, they are genetically males, but they have no haplogroups because they could not produce any anatomically straight male at all. Andrygenous. This is a huge subject. But to try and explain a little; In either humans or animals the presence of albinism is similar. It's a mutation. So even though, for example, some cats that look white but may actually be albino or express some degree of albinism and this can be seen if their skin or fur is viewed in a microscope. Therefore, the term 'pale' refers to albinism. It's a refraction. The skin cells have undergone a mutation and is altered and the way that sunlight bounces off of the skin cells gives off a light color. There is no dark pigment or any color within the skin cells. But white skin actually has melanin and this can easily be seen in skin cells under a microscope. The dark pigment has been removed and under a microscope, may look like a dull white or light yellow, in the clearly defined disk within the skin cell. Nevertheless, the skin cells can clearly be seen under a microscope.

Exactly! I've heard some White preachers even say this. But, I was amazed once when a prominent Black preacher say that he had no idea why the American government was not mentioned in scripture and gave an explanation as to why even today, this major prophetical 'Babylonian empire' has not formed yet. LOL. The preacher's name is Allen Parr, I believe. He gave a break down on the prophecy about the Second Rome and never even considered that this American 'empire' would be what the prophets wrote about. It's been 2000 years plus 500; that prophecy should be about up by now if it is true. Unless, they were writing about space ships taking slaves to the planet Mars, then I think the trade ships are a thing of the past now. Exactly. One prophecy is that 'the 8th government' would come out of the '7th government' and the last government to run over here with their colonial trade ships was the English speaking people. Even though, we are not taught history to understand everything, of AD 1335, the timeline seems to be exact to that ancient prophecy hundreds of years before even the First Roman Empire formed. In the AD 1400s, right after the Bubonic Plague, it was the [1] Portuguese and the [2] Nederlanders that first set sail for the Americas and Africa. But it was [3] Italy that started the movement that became known as 'the Age of the Renaissance' [i.e. Rebirth] in the AD 1300s. The prophecy of the deadly wound healed and a rebirth occurred and began in Italy all over again. For about a hundred years they started painting images of White Jesus and spread this form of rhetoric from Italy to France and then Africa. Then 'in 1492 Columbus sailed the ocean blue'. Then it was [4] the Germans and [5] the Spanish who operated together, then [6] the French. Then finally, in the 1600s, [7] the English empires [British empire] set sail and soon, they all leagued up [7-leagued]. After the French and Indian war in the 1700s, and the last war of 1812, the English speaking Americans broke off and formed this American government. The British crown was India, but for all of Europe, it was Africa and finally America that fed their system. Of course, there is so much more to this history but, the prophets detailed this even long before the rise of the First Roman Empire. The Portuguese had their Original Celts; Iberians, the Italians had their Negroes, or Lusitanians, etc., the Germans had their Spanish Gypsies, and well, the French were pretty darn a concentration of a lot of Old World Negroes that dominated the ancient Silk Road trade from the far east all the way up into Scandinavia. These Chephren men [i.e. Frenology] or Frankushite men that gave their ancient name to the country of France embraced the Austrians and Germans that controlled East Europe, the ancient Greek country like the Balkan regions and Central Europe for like a thousand years. Oh but, just like Daniel prophesied 1500 years earlier even before the Black genocide started and the Age of Colonization began, after the comet of 1066 came and a census was taken, well, the Crusaders came back to the Old Mediterranean world to cut down those Seljuk Turkish [Tur-Kushite] Muslims and then came Genghis Khan. The Great Khan and his Golden Horde and Ilkhans made the Khwarazmian empire [i.e. Chorazin] forgotten history. Thank God for the Bubonic Plague, as crazy as that sounds, because Black men were being heaped up in endless piles continuously until that plague arrived to bring a brief pause in time. After that, some of those Negroes got out of there. They fled the north world and the east. The fled the Eurasian continent of Berea [Europe], Iberea and Cholchis [Russia] and Siberea. They had enough of Khazakstan and Turkmenistan and the far east and set sail to become part of the Mayan world, or part of the Mound Civilizations, or Chaco Canyon, --far away from the Old Mediterranean World. And some set sail back to Africa and etc. Soon though, all of sudden after about a hundred years and for those who stayed in Europe, they became Infidels. They once again became the blame for all the trouble. The Musketeers became forgotten if they were not fortunate enough to flee to the Americas and melt into the tribes of the Americas. And the British empire knew how to benefit from all of them, the Tudors and the ancient Dorians, and the Original Celts, Moors, etc. and they set sail with these Pirates and when they got over here to America, they turned deceived them. All of a sudden, they don't know what in the 'H3ll' a Hugenot means. LOL. The Renaissance was a pivotal European cultural movement and historical period, roughly spanning the 14th to the 17th centuries, characterized by a "rebirth" of interest in classical antiquity and a flourishing of the arts, literature, science, and philosophy, marking the transition from the Middle Ages to modernity. It began in Italy... AI Overview [9] And he said, Go thy way, Daniel: for the words are closed up and sealed till the time of the end. ... [11] And from the time that the daily sacrifice shall be taken away, and the abomination that maketh desolate set up, there shall be a thousand two hundred and ninety days. [12] Blessed is he that waiteth, and cometh to the thousand three hundred and five and thirty days. [13] But go thou thy way till the end be: for thou shalt rest, and stand in thy lot at the end of the days. DANIEL 12: 9, 11-13. ***** Seals have been ALL been opened at the time of the First Roman Empire ***** * Daily Sacrifice taken away means 'the Crucifixion'-- and the Destruction of temple worship-- no more going to temple to bring the priests daily sacrifices because the temple was destroyed by the Romans *Abomination that Maketh Desolate means Herod's renovation, and the pagan temple was erected in place of Jews' temple and Roman idol became supreme. --Baal Worship--in the form of Jupiter, Apollo, and an idol that their ancestors never knew *1290 days; thousand two hundred and ninety days. a day for a year prophecy; A.D. 1290. Ultimately in A.D. 1290, [i.e. AD 1291 Gregorian Calendar] the Muslims were able to combat Crusade forces and Ghengis Khan's forces stopped them from entering into Egypt. The last Battle ended the Crusades; the Seige of Acre-- AD 1291. * 1335 days; thousand three hundred and five and thirty days. A day for a year prophecy; A.D. 1335-- the Black Death Plague began in China and spread across Eurasia. It arrived in London around AD 1347. There was another surge in AD 1666.

Yes. I agree. I believe that this American government pushed this issue deliberately. Xenophobic spirits. The problem is, 'in my opinion'-- that African American DOS have been conditioned from the beginning when this system set up to believe that this is normal. We are born into a kind of conditioning, not only for this issue but other ideas too, that could not be pushed on other African leaders in the continent of Africa. And so, as a result, I also believe that most Black Americans over here don't even realize the history behind this issue and except it as being normal. For this reason, I don't kick against them. But there is NO homosexual gene. A straight 'anatomical' male and female should be taught the truth first when they are little, but this government has went all out in offering all kinds of benefits for this homosexual community to exist in public schools. And this means that the government allows parents to dictate 'the gender' of their child, all the while, --NOW-- there are several court cases where parents are actually charged and punished if their 'child' bring guns to school and shoot up place... Something just seems wrong when I think about these two issues.

Yes. I believe what the valid scientific organizations report with the exception of the Harvard man. I respect him though, but his ideas seem so far fetched.

Mutation. Neanderthals are not African. They had NO Haplogroups in any association with being males. Never. The original Africans were not inter-sexed. Intersexed is NOT an African 'original' trait. Neanderthal origins are NOT African. They are intersexed. Yes. All pale skin 'not white' origin is due to albinism. The very references you posted reveals this fact. All pale skin stems from a mutation and a disease of albinism.

The Interstellar Star, 3I/Atlas, Has Suddenly Turned into A GREEN STAR New York Post: Manhattan-sized interstellar object 3I/ATLAS now turning green as something is ‘switched on’ as it nears Sun By Shane Galvin Published Sep. 11, 2025, 11:29 p.m. ET The Manhattan-sized interstellar object 3I/ATLAS is now turning green as it rockets closer to the Sun — with experts stating it appears something “switched on” to inspire the “anomalous evolution.” https://nypost.com/2025/09/11/world-news/manhattan-sized-interstellar-object-3i-atlas-turning-green-as-something-is-switched-on-as-it-nears-sun/ Interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS could be turning bright green, surprising new photos reveal News By Harry Baker published September 11, 2025 New photos captured during the recent "blood moon" total lunar eclipse show that the interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS may be turning green as it gets closer to the sun. https://www.livescience.com/space/comets/interstellar-comet-3i-atlas-could-be-turning-bright-green-surprising-new-photos-reveal ____________________________________________________________________________________ I still have not finished sharing past research about the other three green stars [comet stars] that showed up in our skies! But now, it has just been reported that this new star from another solar system, 3I/ATLAS, has just turned green! The reason why I believe that this star is important for people of African descent to regard stems from ancient prophecies and ancient history. More importantly, I think that the western world deliberately suppresses information that would be a benefit to know. One major hidden issue about this insane new star that has entered our skies revolves around a prediction of when it will come its closest of which is said to be October 29, and October 30, 2025. I believe that Black people should think about a significant historical aspect of this star coming close to our solar system during that time for a very important reason. The fact that this star has suddenly turned green correlates to ancient prophecy. The prophet Daniel, too, wrote about a parent star from which a prophetical star would break off and move into our solar system. Our scholars today report that this 3I/Atlas star that was first seen on July 1, 2025, this year will not harm us and will not come close to earth. But while we read this good and reassuring news, however, for many decades western scholars have also reported that it would not be possible for any star to be green in our solar system. So now though, will they correct their error? Could we have been given a false sense of security? Hopefully, this 3I-Atlas star will stay far away and not bring us any harm and hopefully it will continue to do as the other recent comets and keep moving on out of our inner solar system. But why would these stars come into our solar system just for show? If this star has moved past Jupiter, then would it not be close enough to possibly affect our solar system in some manner? Our solar system planet-stars, no matter how far they are away from the sun, do to affect our earth from time to time as history reveals. So we are made to believe that this fast moving green comet-star moves through our solar system only for show? May be it will not affect our planet or may be it will, who knows for sure? However, for our scholars to ignore the fact that ancient scriptures do reveal that at times, certain stars do affect our planet and therefore hints that there may be a deliberate attempt to hide truth. This interstellar star has been the third star detected to come from another solar system with our technological instruments today, and happens to be much larger than the others. It has been reported that this star measurements are 100 times larger than the other two interstellar stars detected. So far and for thousands of years, there has been no star that has affected our earth to the point that all life has ceased to exist! But for our western scholars to tell us that these recent comets do not affect our planet, seems to NOT be completely truth. For each of the recent three green comets that came from what has said to be 'the Oort Cloud' and that have come closest to our earth, there has been major catastrophes that have happened. Coincidence? At any rate, it seems to be very interesting too, that this new star will come its closest at the time of the most important holiday of all time; Halloween. Halloween would be an ancient 'October Festival' however, due to the earth's tilt, it may begin at the end of September and run up to October, or it may begin in October and run up to the early part of November. Nevertheless, this festival, A DUAL THEMED FESTIVAL, which last for days, would be soundly based on the month of October and has been called by many, many other descriptive terms. But out of all of the terms that define this festival, ultimately, this festival revolves around the theme of HUMAN SACRIFICE; the human sacrifice of Black African men. Thousands of years prior to the downfall of the Egyptian government of the 18th Dynasty and the institution of the Passover Festival, this ancient Festival occurred whereby, a dual [duel] occurred between two black males and in which one was sacrificed. Even after the Exodus, this festival continued to be observed all over the ancient world and up until now. For this reason, the Passover Festival was instituted. And so, more than a thousand years after the Exodus, and due to the earth's tilt and the leap year, Jesus Christ was Crucified on the eve of Halloween when this Saturnalia ritual was set to occur on a LUNAR CALENDAR First Day of the Lunar Month which would have been during the middle of the month of October. At that time too, there was a Total Solar Eclipse of which marks that event in which a new moon occurred. Therefore, the Jews' Passover of which occurred on October 15 and even, or 6:00 P.M., a Thursday evening, coincided with the ancient Hallowed Owen's festival [Saturnalia festival]. For the Jews, it was now October 16, Thursday, but scientifically and for the Romans, it was still 'Woden's Day' or 'Wednesday', October 13 until sunrise. Jesus was made to wear the symbolic royal robe of 'the god Hercules/Mercury' and don a crown for the festival and then sacrificed at the end of the march. In Central Italy, after the overthrow of the Etruscans, the wooden 'brown' or 'bronze' statue of 'the god Saturn' [i.e. Seth] was at times used for the festival and parade and then stored in the Temple of Mercury. In ancient Egypt, the dual was between the god Osiris versus the god Seth. Later after the Fall of the First Roman Empire and in other parts of the world, a blue-black effigy was burned at the end of the festival march. But after the Crucifixion, the time of this ancient festival was changed to revolve around the solar Calendar and moved to be observed at the end of October. Nevertheless, at the time of the Crucifixion, this was also 'the First Resurrection', hence the theme of skeletons coming up out of the graves. Three days after the Crucifixion, on October 19, the First Day of the Week, Sunday, Jesus Christ rose from the Dead. Again, although today, Halloween, continues to be observed as 'a summer's end' festival and incorporates the Harvest Festival, a Daytime theme, however, during the rise of the Roman Empire times and long before, this holiday was a nighttime festival, 'a lunar festival', as the major symbols and themes should reveal. Halloween's dark themes revolve around nighttime hence the moon themes and not the solar disc. Halloween symbols such as 'a crescent moon', bats, cemeteries, skulls, the decapitated pumpkin head, skeletons, and witches, etc. are all lunar themes Also, the major time of year clearly depicts the end of summer, but specifically, the theme revolves around the autumn season of 'death' and of fall leaves, and the color of orange, red, brown, and black. After the Crucifixion, the Passover festival was moved to be observed during the springtime in either March or April in Rome, and the Saturnalia ritual was moved to be observed during the Winter Solstice week in December. If this ancient festival would have been based on 'a solar theme', it would have symbols of daytime and harvest, but it does not. Therefore a harvest festival would be a separate festival apart from a very ancient Halloween festival. As I have shared in the past, throughout times, more and more about this festival has been revealed over the course of thousands of years. So even though scholars today do not mention that around the time of this Halloween, howbeit, we will have this amazing 3I-Atlas star move close and become hidden from earth behind our sun. Will there be another star like this green interstellar comet to come into our solar system as well? 3I/ATLAS has Suddenly Turned Green as It Closes in on Mars

I am opinionated when it comes to Black men doing so much of this, however, I still appreciate some aspects of the talent and some positive vibes. I understand how we are being exploited. But in some regards, there are some talented portrayals of Black women and I just do not have a problem with it. This one actor, is just too funny. Ms Renee.

I too have never heard of Charlie Kirk until now. The governor of Utah said that he was praying that the shooter would not be 'one of us'. LOL. He said he had hoped that it would have been someone from out of state or from another country but he was sad to learn that his prayers were not answered.

Well, the reason why, the scripture goes "Babylon is fallen is fallen in REVELATION 18:2 refers to both the First Rome and then Second Rome. Because of history, we know that Babylon One or [the First Roman Empire] has fallen but many people have no idea of a formation of a Second Rome. So, today, many people have no idea of what that means, let alone preparing for some kind of massive downfall. So, if they did know then, I would suppose they would make sure to prevent it from happening. For the most part, people do not believe in prophecy even though many have come to past.

Yes, I suppose in reference to what we say today, he would be of African descent. Absolutely not Neanderthals. They are not all all of African origin. The primitive humans were not all all African. You will never find any primitive humans in any cave depictions of primitives with afros.

Oh no. Those writings were not put on any printing press for almost a thousand years in some regards. No one believed that the lavish Temple complex in Jerusalem would be built or demolished. That's like another White House being built and told that it would be demolished by a meteor storm 70 years from now. Daniel lived 500s BC. Herod was not even born until like 30 BC. That's like us reading about something that will not happen until 2525 about 500 years from now. The prophet Zechariah prophesied about cars. If humans were that smart, then they would have been driving their chariots 2000 years ago and not being pulled by horses up until the days of John Wayne. The prophet Zechariah wrote that the horses were INSIDE the chariot. That kind of horse power 'engine' did not occur until Henry Ford was born. The Black Death Plague did not happen until AD 1335. Daniel wrote his book 1335 + 500 = 1835 years ago. Who could ever believe that there would come a time whereby, everyday, for about 200 years African children would be stolen from their homes and forced into massive slave ships for a year and made to lie in feces and on their sides, tightly packed for about 365 days. The prophet Ezekiel wrote that in detail, but it seems ridiculous to think that could ever happen or that world governments would do that and the human race went about their daily lives for 200 years as if it was normal!? . I can understand now, that it's possible to believe what is written about the meteor storm to destroy a third of the planet and prepare to live in caves during another ice age, in a sense but, on the other hand, just as in the past, most people that are high up in big governments don't believe it. Homeless people are being forced out of their tents, an already sad existence by the wealthy and powerful government with no fear of one day themselves having to flee back into live in Siberian caves if they are lucky. Jesus said 500 years after Daniel: [14] And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations; and then shall the end come.... [20] But pray ye that your flight be not in the winter, neither on the sabbath day: [21] For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be. MATTHEW 24: 14, 20-21. Daniel Wrote 500 years before Jesus: [1] And there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation even to that same time: and at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book. [2] And many of them that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt. ... John's Vision: [2] ... Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and is become the habitation of devils,.... [8] Therefore shall her plagues come in one day, death, and mourning, and famine; and she shall be utterly burned with fire: for strong is the Lord God who judgeth her.... REVELATION 18:2, 8.

Oh well. He is 57 years old and that girl is only 22! Whose the predator? What in the H3ll is wrong with him. Learn how to fight back!? It's not about her being White, shoot even if she were Black, I think he would be making a mistake. Monique warned him! That young girl got his money.

True. So then, I guess that's why 'The Magnificent Seven' would not make the list. I thought Denzel did a good job in that movie. I did not see 'First Sunday' on the list. I loved that movie. I might be a little too ghetto, but I loved the first film Friday. I see that made the list. I see a lot of my favorites. I loved the movie Glory. I just visited a Civil War memorial and then watched that film recently. I also loved Black Hawk Down and Hotel Rwanda.

I hope that you are right! idk. I'm pessimistic and think that this issue will be a great devastation. This is a serious offense against the human 'race'! OMG!!! Honestly, I believed that this was the plan hatched at the time of the 911 attacks and before former President Obama became president. I believe that is why he did not support Reparations but instead became the decoy so that this American government could do the opposite. I believe that the National Guards are sent in to attack the homeless and define them as criminals. They've already mowed down 75 homeless sites! Where are these people going to go? Non-Black people are going to be hurt too, but this will hurt many African Americans. This is human sacrifice. Black Americans need to say that we are descendants of Slave Children and not merely DOS. This government enslaved millions of little African children and we are the product of that today. Now, they want to say that African Americans are a problem, homeless, jobless as if it's are fault completely. This is why the Bible refers to many as 'the CHILDREN OF ISRAEL'. It's not that we are specifically 'children' but due to deliberate acts of stealing children and hundreds of years of deprivation, as adults, we are in essence 'children' and lack proper knowledge of how the government has exploited us. Look, I graduated from a Black college! I graduated from an HBCU and did not even know about 'the Eyes on the Prize' film until I went to the public library and browsed. Alot of history about the Civil Rights Movement is not part of the American curriculum. Many countries in other parts of the world know much more about us over here that we do! Not only will Black males be destitute being forced out of homeless shelters, but so will many Black mothers. So, what about the children? Are they going to round up the homeless now, and force them into Florida Alcatraz or some other concentration camp? idk this sounds pretty bad.

@Mel Hopkins You are so beautiful inside and out! You bring so much positive energy to this community and to the world!

It has everything to do with present day humans. Well what about angels? What do they look like? Color was not created at the time humans appeared on earth but was part of this earth long before modern humans arrived. No. The pale gene has nothing to do with 'the gene that causes White skin'. Albinism is a recessive trait and a mutation, but the genes that causes White skin functions completely different from the gene that causes albinism. Although this short video does not explain the genetic basis, it is a great film to better understand how the gene that produces healthy light skin or white skin functions. This film is about people of African descent; Beautiful South Africans who many express this form of reproduction and genetic trait. Even though this film explains the phenotype and how light skin occurs without a genetic explanation, however, it may help to understand. But, there is a lot more about how healthy white skin happens.

What is so ironic about this term!? Anyway, the problem with this belief would be that it is obviously used by White Supremacist but, they themselves have 'black blood' showing that the one drop rule is a distortion. In reality, humans are NOT defined based on whether or not we express dark skin as being a primary factor or we are not defined based on whether or not we have a little black blood due to an African ancestor. Skin color is one of several other major physical characteristic that is a factor in how certain ethnic cultures of people are defined. But by itself, skin color means nothing in how a person is defined. For example, Solomon was very black skinned and he described himself as being a twin to the Black virgin. But Solomon's racial identity would not be 'a Black man', however, he was an Israelite man. He was an Israelite of the tribe of Judah. And then there is Solomon's father, David. David was described as being 'a Ruddy man'. So how can David's racial identity be that he was 'of the Brown Race' or 'of the Red Race' and his son be a completely different 'Race' and of the Black Race? So, skin color is a physical characteristic not a defining factor of 'the Human Race'. Today, the Black Race could mean African Americans, or Nigerians, or Ghanians, or Jamaicans, or Haitians, or South Sudanese, or maybe a kind of people in India, etc. But maybe in ancient times, the word 'KEMET' may define African people and one physical characteristic of Kemet people was their dark skin or black skin and another physical trait would be thick hair and a people who formed cultures along the Nile River, etc. But however, an ancient Assyrian would not be defined as Kemet. Even if an Assyrian had dark or swarthy skin complexion, they would not be Kemet. And furthermore, a dark skinned Assyrian would not even be considered as 'a Syrian'! An Assyrian or White Syrian was a people that formed a distinct ethnic cultural identity in a geographical region apart from the Syrians. So even if a Syrian was very light skinned, that person would be from a unique culture and not an Assyrian at all, even though, they had a common origin at an earlier time period. Likewise, many Europeans today, express blue eyes, and therefore, they definitely have a little black blood! You can't have blue eyes with any other pigment but Eumelanin, meaning black pigment. However, they are not of the Black Race. Today, Europeans or White people with blonde hair and blue eyes are of the White Race. They are not considered to be Black just because they have a little black blood. But today, people today are categorized differently and what a confusion!

No.... Irish Poles Jews and Italians were not always considered members of the White race...yet their skin was white Whilst people from Iran Lebanon and Egypt or MENA Descent were consider members of the White race....yet the vast majority of whose skin is brown. "No.... Irish Poles Jews and Italians were not always considered members of the White race...yet their skin was white Whilst people from Iran Lebanon and Egypt or MENA Descent were consider members of the White race....yet the vast majority of whose skin is brown." Going back to try and respond to some earlier comments; Whether 'Irish Poles Jews, and Italians' have white skin or not, nevertheless, it would be their genetic origins and not only their phenotype that define their physical identity. Likewise, whether 'Iranian, Lebanese, Egyptian or of MENA descent, it would not be because these people tend to have brown skin that define them completely, even if they regard themselves to be of the White race. As you have mentioned, that would be 'a social construct' and they would be recognized as such to be distinguished from their earlier origins and specifically to be distinguished from their earlier 'African and Black origins'. So even though these people have white or brown skin, no matter, their genes express a commonality that also is vital in understanding how they are defined. They are defined based on cultural practices and other shared factors that show up as 'gene flow' as genes tend to travel in pairs. Therefore, because none of these ethnic cultural peoples mention express 'a complete white color' but a blending, their being defined as 'the White Race' is relative. By the time that they have erased the dominant African traits through sex selection, it would be acceptable to regard them as being of the White race, even if they have brown skin along with other traits such as straight type hair. But that does not mean that it would be scientifically accurate, nevertheless, it would be a governmental category and a social construct. So if European Jews are referred to as being 'of the White Race', or 'European', nonetheless, it still would not erase the presence of their origins and the presence of the Original Jews, and more importantly, their governmental White-ethnic identity would not erase the written description and the historical definition of 'the Original Jews' dominant genetic identity. The ancient scriptures define the identity of the Original Jews to have the dominant genetic expression and phenotype of having woolly hair and that is redundant throughout the scriptures. And as I explained earlier, that absolutely does NOT mean that all Jews must have nappy hair, but that this would be a major phenotype expressed for many of the Original Jews because the beginning of their ethnic and cultural identity is based on them living in Africa for four hundred years and intermixing with African people. So, when it comes to this modern world and the many European Jews, well, if they say that their origins stem from the Original Jews, then why would that be wrong if their genes still reveal this origin? If their phenotype shows that they look like the White Race or European, then it would obviously mean that they intermixed with Europeans for a long time, but their genes may still reveal something else. The bottom line though, would be that all modern mankind have genetic material that will show that one aspect of their genetic origins stem one Black African male. But then, the practice of sex selection for the purpose of White Supremacy yields other deep truths and reveals that at one time, modern humans intermixed with Primitive humans. And when sex selection is practiced to the point that certain kinds of mutations occurs, then, another major scientific genetic issue arises! If mutation occurs to the point that the dominant gene expression of African traits are completely gone, then that human is NOT defined as being 'of the Black Race'. In other words, a human with straight hair who continues to reproduce for the purpose of erasing the trait of nappy hair can cause a mutation to occur, and not only erase that trait but break other genetic bonds as genes travel in pairs. Therefore, other 'African traits' or dominant traits of Africans also go through a mutation, and so these traits can never be reversed for that individual. So based on the culture that forms, they would be defined based on a shared gene pool. Because the gene material of the Primitive humans is not abundant and there are NO anatomically straight Y-DNA primitive males, then, there is no such existence of a Primitive inter-racial culture of humans. However, there is much more to this though. So for now, to say that Polish people or Poles are of the White race today, does not mean that they did not have Black African origins. To say that Irish people are of the White race today, does not mean that they did not have Black African origins. One key factor about the Poles and their ancient historical origins would be based on geography. In the ancient Byzantine world, and long before that time even, the dominant name in that region for an ancient people was names like 'Pul', and 'Arpad', etc. But before the Greeks, the names were 'Black names' like 'Pul' and 'Pelops', [i.e. Peloponnese].

Yes! Awesome! The description of Jesus Christ by the prophets all correlate, and what is so fascinating for me would be that every word written down seems to be a confirmation. I can see where the 'burnt brass' could mean that Jesus may have looked black or black/brown, or bronze! Years ago, I did extensive research on ancient metal works of brass and bronze and iron, etc. I was so amazed at how, after hundreds of years, the earlier Bronze Age used the element 'nickel' to make bronze. But then the second Bronze Age came about due to a newfound technique and the use of 'tin', [If I remember correctly] became used. I was so surprised to learn that brass was a mixture of bronze and another metal and for this reason, brass was much darker than copper. So the Copper Age was overshadowed by the Second Bronze Age and many of the idols of the Egyptians did look black!!! It looked like black metal! I apologize for not coming back sooner, but my family is stressing me out recently!