Chevdove

Oh gosh no. I am absolutely not saying that at all. These big governments all over the world are not that stupid. Although the issue of skin color has been a distortion and used to suppress humanity, 'Race categories' are defined based on 'skin color' and that is definitely genetic based.

Serena is charming and it seems to me that her husband dotes over her and gives her the respect that she deserves. When Kendrick Lamar ask her to support his efforts, she came running--literally! She has shown her support for her people. Leave her alone!

lol. @Pioneer1 You could have chosen so many other pictures that would show him to be much more handsome. LOL. Thank you @aka Contrarian! I did!

BEAUTIFUL!!! You are so pretty. Your Mom is gorgeous and I can see the resemblance. The wedding pictures are so lovely.

Yes, there needs to be Black Unity at least, to some significant level. To think that there will be a complete Black Unity is a pipe dream though, but if there was some sort of significant organization, then it would be so beneficial.

I think that is relative, meaning for one person this could mean 'a good thing' and this world as we know it will be stopped from holding them in captivity, but for others, it will end and be 'a bad thing'. They will be stopped from harming others. But when? idk. I don't think it will end tomorrow for the whole wide world. There are signs that it will happen, but when? I wish it would happen but then, I do not want to go through a bleak existence either. The prophecies about how things will unfold, by and by, is awful. So I guess, the prophecy about 'rapture' may be 'a good thing' and if that means a person could be swooped up and carried away to another land that is paradise, where there is new landscape, and well constructed cities, and streets paved with gold, and rivers, abundant tress, brilliant mountain ranges, waterfalls, mansions, abundant trees, fruits and herbs, etc. well, it sounds like rapture is a good idea to imagine. However, if end times means that there will be tribulation whereby humanity will be i living in caves and eating grass blades for food, etc. no way. No way would I want my end time to BEGIN like that. So since you are not religious, the end times for you will be bliss, meaning, there is no way to tell how things will unfold. But if there will be no chance of being free from humans that caused hardship on the world, then will end times be a good thing for you? idk about that because who knows what happens after death? For someone who is alive and who has a loved one die, then I could see where their life may feel like 'nothing' and 'an ending'. I can see where that might be a possibility. So it seems.

That's just it. How can it be confirmed? Nothing 'new' is being reported. We are being led to believe the 'official' reports in that he committed suicide, even though deep down inside, we should know better than to believe that lie. Many of us want to believe that this kind of evil just could not be true, even though it's been going on since the beginning of the set up of America. So for this reason, when the African American police chief reported that there was no foul play and this young man died by suicide, we ignore all of the other reports that may hint at the obvious. We are flooded with a lot of deliberate lies too, and so we use these false reports as a reason to ignore the obvious. Some of us just don't want to believe in Satan and that Satanism is actually White Supremacy and hatred against Black people. Because we are born in sin, we just don't want to believe that evil humans, both White and Black, would launch an all out movement against ancient and written facts about our Black AFrican origins being created in the image of Uh ... So now, we have allowed the enemy to shut down our only pathway to being able to overcome this kind of evil and we have to rely on some other outside source and other good willing White Americans to help us deal with kind of evil. So I looked and looked and other than this Black Panther group, most of the people digging to get at the truth are from outside sources such as the INDIA TIMES, a Palestinian man, and etc. This is what they reported: Trey Reed's father, whose name is Genesis Perry, posted on his facebook page that his son, Trey had repeatedly told him that he and the few other Black students were being harassed by a bunch of white boys on campus. They would shout racial slurs at him and other Black students. Trey filed a complaint to the Police Department but became frustrated because nothing was done and continued to seek help. No matter how obvious this is, why isn't the Democratic Party putting their boots on the ground? Why is the voice of the Black Church silent? How big is America? __________________________________________________________ THE TIMES OF INDIA 'Began to fear for life': A father's post on Mississippi's 'Trey Reed Suicide' goes viral; 'Our son left fearing for life' ... Sep 17, 2025 One Genesis Perry posted a message on Facebook, stoking the controversy as he urged people, especially, the Reed family to not let go this incident. He said the university has a reputation of racist attack and his son too faced the same in the past and left the university fearing for his life. "He was calling home talking about some of the racism he was experiencing alone with some of his friends. White guys riding around on campus throwing trash at them and calling them Ni**. He finally got the tag number and called the police. They did nothing. Our son then began to put pressure on the department because it was constantly happening and he hadn't heard back from the complaint he file. ... https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/began-to-fear-for-life-a-fathers-post-on-mississippis-trey-reed-suicide-goes-viral-our-son-left-fearing-for-life/articleshow/123926943.cms ________________________________________________________________________ Trey Reed’s death at Delta State sparked lynching claims. Police, coroner found no foul play, but family alleged injuries. Autopsy awaited to confirm cause. https://www.youtube.com/shorts/5rMXAtYFmaQ?feature=share https://www.tiktok.com/@melissasantosofficial/video/7551203843153874207?is_from_webapp=1&sender_device=pc https://www.tiktok.com/@pali_viking/video/7550799319402695949?is_from_webapp=1&sender_device=pc Hindustan Times ... Was Delta State student Trey Reed 'lynched'? Coroner issues major update on 'broken leg' rumor ByShamik Banerjee Trey Reed’s death at Delta State sparked lynching claims. Police, coroner found no foul play, but family alleged injuries. Autopsy awaited to confirm cause. ing/video/7550799319402695949?is_from_webapp=1&sender_device=pc Unfortunately, we are back in it again though.

Yes and I here that some people do not agree with his input. Yes, sometimes, I think in one sense, this just seems hopeless, but in another sense, I refuse to believe that this will continue on forever. It will be stopped but then, how will this be stopped and when will this be stopped. I can relate.

CORRECTION: I looked back over my post and see that I did not post the actual reference links as I thought I had done. But again, this male versus female origin is common knowledge in the scientific world today and there are many sources that address that misconception that woman published. So here is some quick references among so many others that all have to report the same findings due to the fact that as of today, all Y sex chromosomes produce baby boys. however the stages from fertilization to when the embryo develops and shows the difference [sex differentiation] is the issue that has been misinterpreted. So in conclusion, so far today, the origin of males that are anatomically straight stems from a male origin. gender is determined [Sex Determination] by the sex chromosome and females cannot produce males. So yeah, asexual reproduction is a whole different conception but even in that process, a female does not contribute a male sex chromosome. Sex Differentiation versus Sex Determination Sexual differentiation is the process of development of the sex differences between males and females from an undifferentiated zygote.[1][2] Sex differentiation is usually distinct from sex determination; ... Humans, many mammals, and some insects and other animals have an XY sex-determination system. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_differentiation Sex differentiation refers to the process of developing distinct biological and morphological characteristics between male and female individuals, ... https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/immunology-and-microbiology/sex-differentiation#:~:text=In subject area%3A Immunology and,lineages that determine gonadal development. Sex Determination and Differentiation David T. MacLaughlin, Ph.D., and Patricia K. Donahoe, M.D. F Sex determination sets the stage for sex differentiation, the sex-specific response of tissues to hormones produced by the gonads after they have differentiated in a male or female pattern. https://www.fmed.uba.ar/sites/default/files/2019-04/maclaughlin.pdf Sex determination vs. Sex differentiation February 17, 2013 by Dr. Sudipta Saha Sex determination sets the stage for sex differentiation, the sex-specific response of tissues to hormones produced by the gonads after they have differentiated in a male or female pattern. https://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/2013/02/17/sex-determination-vs-sex-differentiation/

And so... Uh no. I cited several sources that are scientific. There is no way to give this idiot a pass. This is now common sense due to thousands of years of reproduction. Completely false. All Original Africans have afros-- nappy hair, hair that locks, etc. This is an exclusive genetic trait that marks Original Africans. due to identity theft and White Supremacy, a serious movement that has been detrimental to humanity. Therefore the confusion of why today, big governments do not clarify this confusion is a major problem. Race categories today are based on biology and genetics, but the confusion revolves around 'skin color' and this is only one genetic factor among several others that should be regarded in determining the human species that exist today. Really!? That's news to me! Yes. So true. Okay. Thank you for responding! As for cancer cells, I am not sure.

New Evidence About Trey Reed; He was in a Fight with White Men Before Hanging So, a Black police reported that this young man's death was a suicide, but now, it turns out that this young man was reported to have been involved in a fight with White men shortly before he was found dead and hanging from a tree on a college campus. The New Black Panther Party has organized and are now addressing this issue. I know that this information is recent and may not be confirmed, however, this video is alarming for me.

And another thing: That nut case studied under Alfred Kinsey of whom was a sexual predator and his dealings with children [pedophilia] and prisoners and African Americans were kept suppressed until after he died. So her misinterpretation of the origins of males is, as usual, aligned with White Supremacy and hatred against the Creator of the Priesthood, Black males and the African 'race'. So when it's convenient, racist White dominated systems want to hide their evil acts of human sacrifice and pretend as if we are all ONE HUMAN 'RACE' [origin] but then when they deceive and use Blacks with self hatred to set them up to infiltrate, then when least expected, Black African humans are raped and enslaved and sacrificed and victimized continually. So I can understand why some people believe in the universal idea of being all one human race, however, due to the origins of albinism, and practices of sex selection for the purpose of a White Race, exclusively, etc. NO, humans are not all one species and that is the critical point that needs to be understood. Albinism did not originate in the Black African 'race' of humans at all and this is just one of many other genetic factors that shows that there are more than one species of humans that exist. This has crossed my mind because of a recent video that came on my channel about a young man of whom was just found dead on a college campus in Mississippi. And a Black police chief was used to report that his death was a suicide. I don't see this topic being a major discussion right now, and I am wondering why. Right after the assassination of a controversial White man who spoke against issues about Black people, this young man turns up dead in Mississippi and he was hanging from a tree on that college campus. It turns out that, due to the formation of a new Black Panther Party, this young man had got into a fight with a bunch of White males the day before he turned up dead and hung on a tree, nevertheless, I don't hear much from the American government from either Black politicians or the White ones. smh. Hell no, the Assyrians were not African. They tried to deceive the Egyptians that they were 'One Human Race' and soon elevated to be the head over the Egyptian government. Then these evil White Supremacist outlawed the Theban religion, moved their new capital to Central Egypt and started their Baal and Ashteroth worship, and the Egyptians allowed this to happen. The Supreme Being blamed the Egyptians for allowing these evil White Supremacis to infiltrate their lands and judged them hard for it. And so, hundreds of years later, the stupid acting Israelites were deceived into doing the same thing. And when Jesus came, he did the same thing as his father in heaven. Jesus blamed the stupid watered down Jews for allowing the Gentiles to infiltrate and dominate their government... and so, Jesus was executed for this reason. So no. White people who separate on the basis of being White Supremacist are not 'African' at all.

lol! Okay. No problem. But no, scriptures do not link that demon of White Supremacy to being created by the one who created the Black African 'race'. There is NO proof as to where that 'black turned albino freak' originated. okay.

@aka ContrarianYou know it! That race was awesome. Also Gabby 'with her pretty self', and Tey Tey, and Melissa, also beauty queens--They were all great. But that doll baby Sha'carri brought it in!

You said that the "Supreme Being created evil beings." Do I believe that the Supreme Being created evil beings? No I do not. Based on scripture, it was never written that the Supreme Being Created Satan. It is written that he created modern mankind, meaning the first anatomically straight male, the beginning of all modern Y-DNA haplo groups. But as far as that evil being that started White Supremacy, it has never been written that he was created by the same Supreme Being that Created modern mankind. So, the evil that the world is dealing with now, NO that evil was never created. Iniquity was founded in him, that is how the scriptures define the kind of evil that the world has been experiencing with the set up of White domination and Black hatred and oppression and human sacrifice. The Supreme Being is defined as 'a God of Love' and so yes, it would be a contradiction if he created evil or created 'beings' knowing that they would be evil. IMO, White Supremacy and racism is a mystery. Why would someone think that White people are more supreme than people of Color? That just seems like a form of insanity but due to humans being born for thousands of years and conditioned from birth to believe in White Supremacy only dumbs down humanity. In the Book of Job, the evil 'Being' pitched his argument to Job. He said that 'God's ways are too hard'; meaning, that whatever hid did in committing acts of hatred and human sacrifice, and etc. should be overlooked and that he should have been allowed to remain and continue his aggression against others that he deemed lesser than him. He believes that when the Supreme Being stopped him and cast him out of paradise, that he should have been allowed to remain and continue his acts against others. His ultimate argument in White Supremacy should be accepted but that when he was checked for his hatred and acts of supremacy, he believes that 'God's ways are too hard'. But again, the Biblical description of this early conflict was started by a great arch angel, and that angel was not black. Likewise, the Biblical description of Job and his being struck with some kind of plague and bed ridden and then mocked by his friends for marrying a 'Black woman', etc., was about a non-Black man. Job was not a black man. But he was mocked by his friends for his associating with the Sabaeans and other Black peoples. They told Job that was why he was struck with the plague. Most Bible scholars believe that the Book of Job happens to be one of the most profound books in the Bible that reveals the good and evil nature of mankind.

This is the author of your reference: Mary Jane Sherfey "Geneticists have discovered that all human embryos start life as females, as do all embryos of mammals." I am just curious, did this nut case getaway with this obvious lie because she is a White woman? lol. Let me put the reference that anyone can recognize that this woman is a quack: _______________________________ Are human embryos all female to begin with? No, human embryos are not all female to begin with; sex is determined at fertilization, but early development is sexually undifferentiated. Consensus Meter Requires at least 5 papers that directly answer your question. ... https://consensus.app/search/are-human-embryos-all-female-to-begin-with/304x8lmtQaeU-nNVG1sx4w/ Sex Determination and Early Embryonic Development Genetic Sex Is Set at Fertilization: The chromosomal sex (XX for female, XY for male) is established at the moment of fertilization, depending on whether the sperm carries an X or Y chromosome. Thus, embryos are genetically male or female from the start 121. https://consensus.app/search/are-human-embryos-all-female-to-begin-with/304x8lmtQaeU-nNVG1sx4w/ Mary Jane Sherfey was an American psychiatrist and writer on female sexuality, she received her medical degree from Indiana University School of Medicine in 1943, where she attended lectures on marriage and sexuality given by Alfred Kinsey.Source: Wikipedia _______________________________________________________ So NO. She has mis-interpreted what occurs during the early development stages of embryos; Although all human embryo's sex and gender are determined at fertilization due to receiving a Y and X sex chromosome or a XX chromosome, during the first stages of the embryo, that specific gender is not differentiated in the first stages of development of the embryo. So if the embryo received a Y chromosome from the male father, then eventually that embryo will express this as it matures to full gestation. It in no way means that the embryo is 'a female'. lol. No matter what, if the embryo received a Y sex chromosome, then that baby will definitely be a male. That Y sex chromosome will not turn into a female. lol. Neanderthals are not African no matter where they come from. To imagine a Neanderthal with an Afro is an hilarious idea. okay. You can't change history. Assyrians were as they described themselves to be-- White Syrians. They had a lot of Neanderthal genes. I don't understand your question. I don't know of any human that was said to be completely pale. Perhaps, in terms of other animals there is complete albinism, but I don't know about humans. I don't think so though.

You can't be serious @Troy The earth did not have any continents for like, thousands and thousands and thousands of years. The earth was one mass for probably millions of years and the continent of Africa did not occur until the earth split. So the term 'Africa' is a recent term that reflects modern humans but prior to the presence of AFricans, earlier primitive mankind were not called 'African'. Humans did exist long before the earth split. Not sure about this. There was no such existence of an original 'White' man; anatomically straight Y_DNA. So this is a serious contradiction. All anatomically straight males stem from a Black African male individual, therefore, any white man today 'anatomically straight', stemmed from a Black AFrican origin and became White males due to intermixing with Black African people.

Uh oh! chacun à son goût This brings back memories when One of my friends 'girl' from another country kept stepping 'too' close to me when she would talk. She said that we 'North Americans' were too uptight and that in her country they would be more close in proximity. Well, I politely told her to take some steps back away from me... I told her that I don't care what her people did, I don't play that sh*t. Not down with it at all. I need some space.

Yes. I voted. Dystopian executioner. For me, it's not about skin color, I just appreciate beautiful men, spiritually and physically, no matter what color or culture. However, as a Black women, I cannot help but to be drawn to beautiful men of African descent especially.

I voted! Dystopian executioner

Hey @ProfD I can understand why many may pose this question and why it seems hard to understand because evil has been going on for so long. When it comes to little children being hurt, for me, that is hard to deal with and hard to understand, at first, why would God allow this to happen, but I do understand. There is a lot to grasp though in order to understand this question but for now, I will try to respond in sort of like 'a parable' on some wise. And here is just one of many scriptures that answers this question written by the apostle Peter: [9] The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. 2 PETER 3:8. One of the reasons why this concept is hard to understand and why mankind is not being blamed for his/her own actions is because, the Supreme Being deals with government first and foremost, and NOT individuals who commit heinous crimes. Another reason why it may be hard to understand why evil is allowed to go on for so long has to do with NOT understanding the beginning of evil doings and how it came about. If the origins of evil is understood then maybe people can understand why evil is still going on or, still being allowed to go on and on and on. Why would God allow the sun to shine on the good and the evil? Another ancient scripture may also help to understand why a supreme God would allow this; REVELATION Chapter 12. It is revealed in this vision that evil began long before modern mankind existed here on earth. There was a great violent conflict due to the issue of White Supremacy. And this great war was started by the arch angel, Michael; and he was NOT even black. But he started this great conflict over the issue of Colorism. And so, in this vision, it was revealed that this evil continued and the inhabitants of earth became part of this conflict because there was another conflict over earth as well that occurred. As a result of this great war, is the very reason why the Supreme Being created 'modern mankind'; meaning the Black African 'race' of humans. So this evil conflict is still ongoing and has not ended yet. To take this further; The issue of White Supremacy was started by some 'being' of whom was NOT White but came to believe that White was supreme and as a result of a great war, 'that he lost', he was ejected and he, and many other 'beings' came to exist on this earth. And so, part of the reason why evil exist in this world now and for thousands of years, is because, this 'being' and his followers still exist and the Supreme Being is allowing him to continue to PITCH HIS ARGUMENT. Lastly, for now anyway, the other major reason why evil still exist and is being allowed is due to that very great war. Some of the casualties in that great war were innocent---victims. And prior to the creation of modern mankind, ALL Dark skinned being became evil and we lost. ALL OF THEM. So therefore, Adam was created in the image of the Supreme Being, because he has no plans to erase 'black humans'. However, if black humans do want to be black, it is their free choice, but God's will be done on earth as it is in heaven. and so, after the Original Sin, another problem arose, and therefore, this Black Hatred continues. As a result of this Original Sin, the lamb, elected to intervene and therefore this creation was not stopped. However, as a result of this 'Original Sin' most humans today will continue in this pathway. But because of 'grace' many humans have already chosen to reject Satan Worship. Now, an example of what I mean by the Supreme Being focusing on government initially and not individuals who sin, I will reference the judgment of Egypt at the time of the Exodus in the 1400s B.C. When after this judgement happened and many dropped dead due to some kind of plague, the response was a back lash. The shock turned to rage and the Egyptian government launched a genocide attack. For this reason, the Supreme Being does NOT bring hard judgment against humanity right away. In one sense, not all Egyptians agreed to the victimization of the Syrians, Nubians, etc. but if God killed all of them off for what the government did, then would that be fair? Why should innocent Egyptians who did not agree with slavery be killed off? In addition, even though the Syrians were in captivity and hard bondage, were they all good? Heck no. Some of them were judged immediately and right after the judgment because they were evil too. Some of them threatened to kill Moses, etc. Therefore, the Supreme Being does not wipe out all humans. He judges the government first, on their policies and how they deal with criminals and victims and then, it goes down from that point. And so, after about 400 years, the Supreme Being will pass a hard judgment on a large scale, but at first, he allows governments to form and make the choices. If little children are being victimized then, that is the responsibility of the government, initially. God will NEVER allow a government to go unpunished for allowing innocent to be sacrificed. So the prophecy of end times, will be catastrophic so says the prophets. This end time world judgment will last for a thousand years. But, because God loves the world, he is giving mankind the chance to do the right thing, even though he knows, eventually, he will judge all deeds, both good and evil. [9] The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. [10] But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up. 2 PETER 3:8-9.

I'm late! WOW! That is an awesome picture!!! Absolutely agree.

Yep. Sounds like a contradiction to me. On the one hand, this government allows parents to tell their little children what they are going to be as far as gender and then the law is set up to protect this decision in the public schools. But on the other hand, if children, who are affected by this social media and government and parents, secretly at their parents unaware, go to school and shoot up the place, this government grabs the parents and blame them and then punish them. It is hard to believe that a parent would want their children to do that. Why would this government think that it is okay for a parent to have the right to tell their little sons or daughters that they are going to be a certain gender even if they are born the opposite gender? That seems like completely wrong to me. It should be a protected human right that a female be taught about females being born to give birth and have sex with a male and be responsible for the birth to be the initial nurturers to the very babies they give birth to. etc. It seems obvious that little boys, who are born anatomically with Straight Y-DNA to be taught what can happen when they get older and their balls drop and then they can impregnate a female. They should be taught responsibility and the roles that they would need to exhibit as far as being responsible for the births that will come of such inter-course with a female. They can't have children from having sex with another male? Therefore, this human right of being born male should be a legally protected 'responsibility' of the government to teach little males about their genetics. This American government is a confusion imo. Really!? weird!

Yes. *In Sodom and Gomers' other cities like Sodomy and Gomorrah, existed the presence of the Amorites *In Rome, well that is what they were; the Amorites *In the First Babylon, that is who came to infiltrate and then dominate over the Babylonians; the Amorites and their Amalekite traders, the Celts. *In Egypt, the 18th Dynasty were definitely the presence of the Amorites and their Baal and Ashtoreth religion; the Aten Religion. [12] And when the sun was going down, a deep sleep fell upon Abram; and, lo, an horror of great darkness fell upon him. [13] And he said unto Abram, Know of a surety that thy seed shall be a stranger in a land that is not theirs, and shall serve them; and they shall afflict them four hundred years; [14] And also that nation, whom they shall serve, will I judge: ... ... [16] But in the fourth generation they shall come hither again: for the iniquity of the Amorites is not yet full. GENESIS 15: 12-14, 16. Sodomites, pedophiles... predators on the Black African peoples; the priesthood of the living God. Gotta get those Negroes to accept diversity as being equal and inclusive whereby little black boys are molested and allowed to grow up thinking that it is okay to be molested and told by your parents that you are going to be homosexual, or Trans, etc. Thanks a lot Obama. smh. So, 400 years before the Plague destroyed those pharaoh's Aten Religion, the Creator already rejected them. In 1776, these modern day Amorites, Separated Church and State and broke off from the Crown to keep their Chattel Slavery law and then set up their two-party government... As if God did not know they were going to do it. LOL.

Exactly!