Conspiracy Theories

[ProfD]

27 minutes ago, Troy said:

You too @ProfD?

Not sure what you mean but I was referring to the initial reports several years ago of sealing vaccine paperwork for 75 years.

 

If the paperwork has been released sufficiently, all questions should be answered. Nothing to debate.

 

Yet, some folks are still in doubt of what it was all about for good reason. 

 

in general, I'm skeptical of most everything sold to the public especially when politicians have anything to do with it.

 

27 minutes ago, Troy said:

Man, we live in a world with access to so much information, but collectively we are so ill informed. 

Sure. There is information available. Still have to do your own research and often times, believe half of what is seen and none of what is heard...or take it with a grain of salt.

 

There's no shortage of sleight of hand tricks being played when it comes to everything.

[frankster]

On 9/4/2025 at 6:38 AM, Troy said:

This statement is completely false. We’ve gone over this already. The Covid vaccine is not gene therapy.

Pure unadulterated Bull Crap....out right lies

I doubt very much it is a slip....he said it twice - and then went on to say that had they told or ask the public to take cellular and corrected himself by saying gene therapy 95% of the public would have said no.

If it was it would mostly likely have been a freudian slip....so unless the following is a misprint/post on pfizer website they seemed to agree with what was said...

 

We’ve established a research collaboration with Beam Therapeutics to develop mRNA technology as a potential new approach to gene editing, which is a form of gene therapy. Gene editing works by delivering “tools” encased in lipid nanoparticles (fatty bubbles) that have the potential to replace, remove, or correct faulty genes in patients with rare diseases— providing a potential one-time treatment for these debilitating conditions. Our work is focused on rare genetic diseases of the liver, muscle, and central nervous system.

Our current exploration of mRNA is focused on infectious diseases with development programs in flu and shingles, as well as exploring mRNA’s versatility in the areas of rare genetic diseases.

https://www.pfizer.com/sites/default/files/investors/financial_reports/annual_reports/2022/story/harnessing-the-power-of-mrna-to-transform-medicine/

 

 

 

 

Pfizer confirms gene therapy & the Office of Gene Tech are still in denial - 26.10.23

 

On 9/4/2025 at 6:38 AM, Troy said:

 

it took me five seconds to find several sources that fact checked the guy statement you can read one here: https://fullfact.org/health/bayer-covid-vaccine-gene-therapy/

Of course it did.....

They conflated the issues in order to mislead....

Gene therapy includes DNA therapy

DNA therapy is one form of Gene therapy...

 

 

On 9/4/2025 at 6:38 AM, Troy said:

 

you can also read what the center for disease control has written about the Covid vaccine not being Gene Editing. https://www.cdc.gov/covid/vaccines/how-they-work.html
 

This is the official propaganda....they are telling you the truth while deny what it actually is...

The below quote in red is the best definition of Gene therapy I have seen or read in lay english....

 

To trigger an immune response, many vaccines put a weakened or inactivated germ into our bodies. Not mRNA vaccines. Instead, mRNA vaccines use mRNA created in a laboratory to teach our cells how to make a protein—or even just a piece of a protein—that triggers an immune response inside our bodies. This immune response, which produces antibodies, is what helps protect us from getting sick from that germ in the future.

 

 

 

On 9/4/2025 at 6:38 AM, Troy said:

This information is easily and freely available to anyone who was interested in learning about the subject.

Misinformation and Disinformation....is readily available.

Real Factual and True Information is often hidden in the fine print....especially in cases where a Conspiracy is at play

 

 

On 9/4/2025 at 6:38 AM, Troy said:

 

Again, this is freely available information from the scientific community you have chosen to not look for it, or you have found it and simply rejected it. There is no reason for me to believe that there is anything I can write that will convince you otherwise.

The information you have provide is misinformation....as I have shown above

 

On 9/4/2025 at 6:38 AM, Troy said:

I’m not sure why people continue to propagate this myth of a vaccine being Gene Editing even if it was Gene Editing and it prevented millions of deaths would it be a bad thing?

The pfizer link above just showed that mRNA is gene therapy and gene editing is a form of Gene therapy...

Seems like you are admitting that it is Gene Therapy?

It is bad because they deceived millions and force many to take it - mark of the beast style....Homoborgensis/transhuman

 

 

On 9/4/2025 at 6:38 AM, Troy said:

 

I just don’t understand this phenomenon.

@frankster now that I presented you with the information you requested are you gonna change your mind?

The phenomenon is that all of us are not sheeple.....We know and recognize that Officialdom is bought and paid for by evil greedy individuals.

Yes you have but the information you provided was and is not new to me....As I know it to be false

[frankster]

The idea behind this post is to show that it is possible for mRNA to be Reverse Transcription into DNA.....If so it is Permanent  - Homoborgenesis

 

 

Dr. John Campbell - Reverse Transcriptase (modRNA into DNA)

 

https://www.instagram.com/p/C9KVF13Ir8i/

https://www.instagram.com/reel/C9KVF13Ir8i/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link

 

Preclinical studies of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2, developed by Pfizer and BioNTech, showed reversible hepatic effects in animals that received the BNT162b2 injection. Furthermore, a recent study showed that SARS-CoV-2 RNA can be reverse-transcribed and integrated into the genome of human cells............................  We also show that BNT162b2 mRNA is reverse transcribed intracellularly into DNA in as fast as 6 h upon BNT162b2 exposure.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35723296/

 

 

 

 

 

[Troy]

The mainstream view of scientists of molecular biology, virology, and vaccines is that mrna vaccines do not integrate into the genome and there is no credible evidence of harmful permanent genomic alteration in humans from those vaccines.

 

indeed, if this were a case given the millions of people who’ve been vaccinated multiple times we would’ve seen evidence of such harm.

 

Instead, we’ve seen hundreds of thousands perhaps millions of American deaths avoided.

 

One video share shows a congressman, Reading a couple of phrases from report and arguing with with an actual doctor.

 

The idea that we would stop taking vaccines because we believe they more harmful than the diseases that they prevent is just crazy to me.

 

Talk to older people who know what polio can do or whooping cough or small pox can do. I had an aunt who died, as a child, from whooping cough. This is not ancient history still people are seemingly ignorant of history.

 

that anti-vaxxer currently running Health and Human Services will be responsible for the deaths of many people, most of them poor.

 

 

 

[frankster]

6 hours ago, Troy said:

The mainstream view of scientists of molecular biology, virology, and vaccines is that mrna vaccines do not integrate into the genome and there is no credible evidence of harmful permanent genomic alteration in humans from those vaccines.

Mainstream is the arm of the elite propaganda machine....

As seen above the very makers has said both in print and verbally that the mRNA vaccine is GeneTherapy.....

Whilst they propaganda arm continues to deny this....

When it come to causing harm....those reports are coming out - some are already out be more and more credible and undeniable reports will come.

 

6 hours ago, Troy said:

 

indeed, if this were a case given the millions of people who’ve been vaccinated multiple times we would’ve seen evidence of such harm.

It is now believed by some scientist and doctors that what is called "Long Term Covid" is the results of DNA damage and or Covid 19 Vaccine entering the Human Genome.

 

6 hours ago, Troy said:

Instead, we’ve seen hundreds of thousands perhaps millions of American deaths avoided.

The evidence that proves this statement of yours above is/as a lie is growing in credibility but has not yet reach the point of undeniable

 

6 hours ago, Troy said:

 

One video share shows a congressman, Reading a couple of phrases from report and arguing with with an actual doctor.

In the current climate one has to be brave to speak the truth.....as they are risking their lives and livelihood

It is not just one doctor.....it is scientists and medical journals

 

6 hours ago, Troy said:

The idea that we would stop taking vaccines because we believe they more harmful than the diseases that they prevent is just crazy to me.

Vaccine are a great technology.....every technology is only as good as the people managing making and using them.

The purposes and intentions for which vaccines are being used is to say the least not good

 

6 hours ago, Troy said:

Talk to older people who know what polio can do or whooping cough or small pox can do. I had an aunt who died, as a child, from whooping cough. This is not ancient history still people are seemingly ignorant of history.

The best lies are told with truth so as to mislead or develop and maintain trust.....disinformation

 

6 hours ago, Troy said:

that anti-vaxxer currently running Health and Human Services will be responsible for the deaths of many people, most of them poor.

I do not agree with everthing he does....but I see where he is bucking the trend of the elitist agenda

Truth sometimes comes from unexpected places...

 

[umbrarchist]

What about the Charlie Kirk Conspiracy Theories unfolding in front of our eyes?

 

Could a 30-06 bullet be stopped by the super human neck of Charlie Kirk? Was there a second shooter? Was a 30-06 bullet ever fired?

 

This is only interesting for watching the Right-Wingers freaking out. I didn't care about him when he was alive. I do not see why he was important enough to kill.

 

But I have fired rifles and pistols. A 30-06 should have just about taken his head off.

.

[ProfD]

2 hours ago, umbrarchist said:

But I have fired rifles and pistols. A 30-06 should have just about taken his head off.

Not necessarily at 200 yards away.  That's 600 feet.  The equivalent of 2 football fields.  It was still an effective kill shot.  No exit.

[Pioneer1]

Umbrarchist

And when this was pointed out, they tried to "explain" this by claiming that the slug didn't actually hit him....but hit his chest and ricocheted off of a rib and hit him in the neck.

And when it was pointed out that a 30.06 slug wouldn't "ricochet" off of anybody but go through them....they said he had on "under armor".
But looking at his t-shirt, I'm not sure what kind of bullet proof clothing he had on under it because it fit just like a normal t-shirt.

And when it was pointed out that a 30.06 slug is so powerful that it would USUALLY  go through any bullet proof vest....but if it didn't....the force would have knocked his ass AND the chair back!
He clearly collapsed and FELL out of his chair.
They have yet to explain that one.


The rabbit holes these racist clowns keep digging get deeper and deeper.

 

 

ProfD

If you see the video of the shot, the wound itself looks like an "exit"....not an entrance.

First of all, if the wound where the blood was gushing out was really an entrance....then why didn't it knock him BACK in the opposite direction????

[ProfD]

4 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

ProfD

If you see the video of the shot, the wound itself looks like an "exit"....not an entrance.

First of all, if the wound where the blood was gushing out was really an entrance....then why didn't it knock him BACK in the opposite direction????

I've seen the video.  To me, everything looked consistent with the distance from which he was shot. 

 

Had the shooter been closer, the results of the shot would have looked a lot different to include taking his head off and knocking his azz out of the chair.

[Pioneer1]

ProfD

I'm not a ballistics expert so I'm not sure one way or the other.
The different explanations don't make sense to me though.

Some 22 year old kid was such an "expert" that he was able to hit him in the chest but instead of the slug "bouncing off" anywhere....it just happened to bounce off and hit them dead center into his jugular???

Sounds like something off of a "Jason Bourne" movie.....lol.
 

[ProfD]

9 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

Some 22 year old kid was such an "expert" that he was able to hit him in the chest but instead of the slug "bouncing off" anywhere....it just happened to bounce off and hit them dead center into his jugular???

i don't believe the slug bounced off his chest. 

 

I think the shooter was going for for a head shot and hit him in the neck. 

 

I wouldn't say the 22-year old shooter was an expert but he spent enough time at the gun range to be proficient. 

 

Again, learning how to use firearms is something white folks do for *fun*.