Black. Men. Becoming. Feminine.

[harry brown]

 Dr   Francis  Cress. Wellsing.  Talked.  About. Black. Boys. Wearing.  Sagging. Pants.  .This  Leads. Boys. Becoming.  Gay. Behavior. Next. There.  Wearing.  Dresses. ..Rapper.  Coolio. Said. Hollywood. Makes. Rappers.  Become. Gay ...Makes. Black. Men. Wear. Dresses ...On. You Tube. .Amazing. On. YouTube.    The. Red. Dress. Run. ,,Black. Men.  Wearing. Red  Dresses. ..  In. Atlanta.  Black. Men Wearing  Skirts.  .. Amazing.  Different.  Ways.  Of. Black. Genocide. ...

[Pioneer1]

Excellent observation Harry

Too many of these young bruthaz are becoming sissified.

And it's nothing new.

I remember the first time I went to the campus of the famed Morehouse, down in Atlanta.
This was back in the early 90s.

I knew it was supposed to be an all male college, but I kept seeing "girls" in tight skirts and hip-huggers walking around holding books up to their chests and flinging their hair.
I thought they may have been visitors too, or maybe some of the girls from Spelman were there hanging out.

The female Administrator I was with pointed out to me that they weren't females at all!

 

 

 

 

When I took a closer look at them, I saw baby beards and mustaches and strong looking faces behind fucked up make-up!

This was around September or October when I visited so I asked her were they doing this for Halloween or something, and she told me they were exercising their "rights" to express themselves....or some bullshit.
Then I started noticing this on college campuses around the country.

But that incident reminded me of a scene in Spike Lee's  "School Daze" when a few of the students were being harassed at a KFC by some street dudes and one of them (played by Samuel L. Jackson) did a limp wrist gesture and asked "Was it true what they said about Mission Men?"

I got the joke....insinuating that the men of their college were gay or effeminate.
However I didn't realize how that joke came about or how close it hit home UNTIL I actually visited Morehouse and saw it for myself.

Many Black men have simply GIVEN UP on being men.
They live in a society that often times doesn't appreciate their manhood or masculinity.
Also, because many of them don't have fathers in their lives growing up.....they haven't learn HOW to be effective men.

I'm over 50 and not what one would call a "pretty boy"...lol...but when it comes to attracting women at my job I run RINGS around most of the dudes under 30.
Most of the men over 45 or 50 do.
Because we come from a generation where we learned to act like and think like MEN.

A lot of younger men.....of all races....tend to have a more "gender neutral" mentality that simply doesn't attract most women or make them feel secure.
They can have a CONVERSATION with them all day and night...but they don't seem to invoke any type of attraction or magnetism because the masculinity isn't there.

Some White men have recognized this and they try to teach their boys hunting and survivalism and try to instill some "tough guy" habits in them at an early age, but it usually doesn't stick.  The society is bent on feminizing the younger generation of boys.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[ProfD]

The war on masculinity has been ongoing for decades now.

 

Our society has accepted effeminate behavior especially where Black males are concerned. 

 

However, Black boys and young men are not the only males vulnerable to effeminization.

 

Too many males are being raised in single-parent households primarily with their mothers.

 

It is not a good thing allowing males to be isolated and playing video games instead of going outside. They should be playing sports and doing other outdoors activities that build competition, strength, endurance and leadership skills.

 

White men recognize the claims of toxic masculinity and they are trying to rewrite the narrative. 

 

The posture and moves POTUS OJ is making are indicative of an effort to reinforce white patriarchy through masculinity. 

 

By default, as white men become hyper-masculine, Black men will have to get right too.

 

@Pioneer1..funny part of the video...

 

Sam Jackson character said "y'all niggas and gon be niggas forever. "  He's looking like an old pimp.

[aka Contrarian]

Why is it  that black men making this tired old  observation about  the feminization of black men  never give others credit for being immune to this campaign? If these complainers ever thought  things through, they'd realize that nobody can turn someone into something they don't already have a predisposition for. 

The complainers continue to believe that the reason they are immune to this conspiracy against black men is because they, themselves, are  too strong and secure in their masculinity to succumb to what others fall for. Implicit in this mindset is the assumption that all other black men are weak.

So, what else is new?

[frankster]

Yes

There is a popular chemical used by many  that also contributes to the feminization of boys on a biological level...As it is now considered a consumable and is being consumed

Just as reprehensible is the use of Media to program our boys toward the belief and idea that they are not what their own biology say they are...on a mental level.

The question is why are they doing this to boys?

[Pioneer1]

2 minutes ago, frankster said:

Yes

There is a popular chemical used by many  that also contributes to the feminization of boys on a biological level...As it is now considered a consumable and is being consumed

 

Are you talking about Atrazine?

[aka Contrarian]

38 minutes ago, frankster said:

 

The question is why are they doing this to boys?

Yes, why? And who is "they". Project 2025 gives no hint of this. Their fascististic evangelical aura  is very homophobic.

How does turning black males into a population of gay men make America great again? It's not as if  the  scattered disunited  population of straight black brothas are a real threat to anyone.

The human species is inevitably evolving toward interchangeable sexual fluidity. In 50 years it will be a unisex society. 

Time brings change. 

[Pioneer1]

1 minute ago, aka Contrarian said:

 

How does turning black males into a population of gay men make America great again?

It doesn't.

However it serves as a method of Black population control.
Something the racists strive for.

[frankster]

1 hour ago, Pioneer1 said:

Are you talking about Atrazine?

Yes.....that too

[frankster]

58 minutes ago, aka Contrarian said:

Yes, why? And who is "they". Project 2025 gives no hint of this. Their fascististic evangelical aura  is very homophobic.

How does turning black males into a population of gay men make America great again? It's not as if  the  scattered disunited  population of straight black brothas are a real threat to anyone.

The human species is inevitably evolving toward interchangeable sexual fluidity. In 50 years it will be a unisex society. 

Time brings change. 

Man made change is not evolution but engineering.

Which tends to be selfish and in the service of and to the  benefit of a few at the cost of the many...Transhumanism (internet of things) - Homoborgensis.

"They" would be the Global Elite.

Often What is displayed bears no resemblance to what is actually been enacted...projected 2025 is one step in a thousand - its purpose is to Disrupt - create crisis.

It is not about Making America Again thats DoubleSpeak...

Yes time bring changes

 

 

55 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

It doesn't.

However it serves as a method of Black population control.
Something the racists strive for.

Yes both population control and power maintenance.

It is commonly held belief that the feminine is easier to control and use....less resistant

[Pioneer1]

21 minutes ago, frankster said:

 

Yes both population control and power maintenance.

It is commonly held belief that the feminine is easier to control and use....less resistant

Interestingly, many learned this during WWII when they started letting large numbers of women into the workforce to run the factories while the men were off fighting.

They discovered that not only were female employees more docile and easier to control, but they also demanded less money and were more likely to put up with unfavorable working conditions without complaining.

[aka Contrarian]

Well, since your "tribe" has it all figured out,  "they" are not doing a very good job of concealing their intentions.

I still believe what wer're seeing in the GenAlpha population is  natural mutation and aberration, that the human species is evolving to a higher broader level of existence.  This along with AI, will bring about a "brave new world".  6 -7.

If there is any tampering going on, I think it is at the hands of aliens who have unknown motives.And you're kidding your selves if you think a population of effeminate males will be more manageable. They will outwit the brutes trying to subdue them. 

[frankster]

54 minutes ago, aka Contrarian said:

Well, since your "tribe" has it all figured out,  "they" are not doing a very good job of concealing their intentions.

It is an unwritten rule that.....Evil must tell the Truth - and if it must deny it with as many lies and distractions at its disposal After.

Hence the concealment is  Monday morning quarterbacking...

 

54 minutes ago, aka Contrarian said:

I still believe what wer're seeing in the GenAlpha population is  natural mutation and aberration, that the human species is evolving to a higher broader level of existence. 

The are smart intelligent and quick.....but the ones i know - lack fight and perseverance

yet i hope u r right.

 

54 minutes ago, aka Contrarian said:

This along with AI, will bring about a "brave new world".  69.

Yes in more ways than one...

 

 

54 minutes ago, aka Contrarian said:

If there is any tampering going on, I think it is at the hands of aliens who have unknown motives.

They own the farm and the animals on it

 

54 minutes ago, aka Contrarian said:

And you're kidding your selves if you think a population of effeminate males will be more manageable. They will outwit the brutes trying to subdue them. 

No they wont

They will be busy out femininizing each other

 

3 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

Interestingly, many learned this during WWII when they started letting large numbers of women into the workforce to run the factories while the men were off fighting.

True

 

3 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

They discovered that not only were female employees more docile and easier to control, but they also demanded less money and were more likely to put up with unfavorable working conditions without complaining.

and they make great sex partners that can potentially provided offspring.

[aka Contrarian]

At the local level women  were and are very instrumental in the unions  that fought for and won equal rights in the workplace. Especially in the civil service work force. Maternity leave is now a given and salary is the same for all workers.

Sexual harassment does continue to be a problem, however,  because men think with their penises.

[Pioneer1]

aka Contrarian

 

At the local level women  were and are very instrumental in the unions  that fought for and won equal rights in the workplace. 
 

Growing up in Detroit which was a Union Dominated city I can say based on my observations, many of the female union members didn't understand the value or purpose of labor unions and SELL OUT the rights and benefits that were fought for generations ago.

-Most of them don't attend Union meetings
-Many of them see nothing wrong with having intimate relationships with members of management, especially for PERSONAL benefit
-Even females in Union leadership don't seem to fight as hard and are more likely to compromise when it comes to pay and benefits

 

You do have exceptions to this obviously and you have women who are strong union advocates; but that's just what they are....EXCEPTIONS, not the norm.

 

 

 

 

 

Sexual harassment does continue to be a problem, however,  because men think with their penises.

Sexual harassment isn't faulted just by the men, but also from the women who ENABLE it by using THEIR sexuality to seek favors from management.

Although rape and sexual assault DOES happen from time to time, the vast majority of sexual encounters in the workplace come from women who VOLUTARILY choose to have sexual relationships with co-workers and management for their own benefit.
One of the by-products of these sexual relationships and exchanges is some of these men begin to think ALL women are willing to have sexual relations with them for benefits instead of realizing that just like SOME will...SOME won't.
But to a certain degree....the women who WILL encourage that type of thinking.

* Having said that, let me state for the record that I personally have NO PROBLEM with a woman (or man) using sex and sexuality for their own personal benefit AS LONG AS IT'S VOLUNTARY.
It's harassment only if it's UNWANTED.
 

[Pioneer1]

We also need to look at the role some of our own women play in the feminization of Black men.

 

 

You have some Black women who publicly  condemn masculinity in Black men but will turn around and PRAISE the very same traits and characteristics in White and Latino men!

When a Black man is acting dominant, sexually potent, and tough....you criticize him as being misogynistic, chauvinistic, and call his masculinity "toxic".

 

However when a Latino man exhibits the very same traits or even acts in a much more sexist and chauvinistic way...you call him a "sexy Latin lover" or talk about how "macho" he is.
His jealous and controlling behavior of women is often either ignored or excused as being "protective" and "traditional".

 

For example.....

 

 

How many Latina women are coming on social media with grins on their faces praising Black men for how well they dress, how tall and muscular they are, or for how big their dick is?

 

[aka Contrarian]

All of your aforementioned is really just an exercise in anecdotal rambling, sending a message that reeks with the  "I'm right and nobody else knows what they're talking about" mantra that you live by. Get a life. 

 

               

[Pioneer1]

16 minutes ago, aka Contrarian said:

All of your aforementioned is really just an exercise in anecdotal rambling, sending a message that reeks with the  "I'm right and nobody else knows what they're talking about" mantra that you live by. Get a life. 

Excuse me but did you intend to post THIS here?

Sounds like some "self reflection" shit.
It reads like it was something meant for your online diary or personal journal.

[aka Contrarian]

Lol.  Sez the resident pontificator. 

[Delano]

There's a difference between men cross dressing being feminine and being gay, bisexual, asexual and pansexual.

 

In addition there's a difference between sexual behaviour and preference. A man in prison may engage in homosexual acts but his preference is heterosexual. Some may change their preference. Sexual identity can be fluid. While behaviour remains the same.

 

 

Sex roles and masculinity and feminity are defined both culturally and temporally. The following don't fit into neat categories. Prince, Ancient Greeks loving boys ir Viking men humiliating weaker men by having sex with them.

[Pioneer1]

6 hours ago, Delano said:

In addition there's a difference between sexual behaviour and preference. A man in prison may engage in homosexual acts but his preference is heterosexual. Some may change their preference. Sexual identity can be fluid. While behaviour remains the same.

 

Alright now.....
Don't stir up no ole shit between me and the frankster...lol.
I think you popped into that old thread a few times and saw us wrestling over that one....lol.

 

[ProfD]

S8xual preference and s8xual behavior goes back hundreds of years. That doesn't make it normal. 

 

The issue here is normaliizing and accepting the effeminization of men and/or effeminate behavior.

 

Throughout most of the planet, alternative s8xual orientation, practices and effeminate behavior are frowned upon and will get a man unalived in many cases. 

 

S8xual persecution and freedom is one reason people flee those countries that do not tolerate it.

 

Go over there talking about s8xual fluidity and behavioral dynamism and be prepared to get that head busted wide open and leaking red kool-aid.

[Delano]

2 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

think you popped into that old thread a few times and saw us wrestling over that one

Were you having homosexual urges when you were wrestling.

44 minutes ago, ProfD said:

S8xual preference and s8xual behavior goes back hundreds of years. That doesn't make it normal.

So were Ancient Greek men and boys normal?

45 minutes ago, ProfD said:

Go over there talking about s8xual fluidity and behavioral dynamism and be prepared to get that head busted wide open and leaking red kool-aid

Make homosexuality is not culturally acceptable, in the US and Africa. Yet there is a population of men that are publicly are with women and privately with men. 

 

I tend to look beyond the surface. Or tve generality accepted narrative.

 

Normal is what 68% of the population does. What is normal us dependent on mores. Groups and subgroups have different norms. Are men in prison that have sex with other men normal?

i read the following quote from a Black man, "You can be gay in the ghetto, but you can't be a faggot. 

[Pioneer1]

22 minutes ago, Delano said:

 

i read the following quote from a Black man, "You can be gay in the ghetto, but you can't be a faggot. 

Replace that word "faggot" with "sissy" and that saying would make more sense.

 

[ProfD]

5 hours ago, Delano said:

So were Ancient Greek men and boys normal?

They were homosexuals. Same goes for Romans most notably Caligula.

 

5 hours ago, Delano said:

Yet there is a population of men that are publicly are with women and privately with men. 

 

Are men in prison that have sex with other men normal?

They are either homosexual or bisexual.

 

The United States has become extremely tolerant of s8xual orientation and s8xual behavior. 

 

Thankfully, children and animals are still off limits. Filthy rich perverts have been able to cross that line too.

 

Again, that's why so many folks want to live in the land of the *free*. 

[Delano]

11 hours ago, ProfD said:

They were homosexuals. Same goes for Romans most notably Caligula.

Was it normal ?

11 hours ago, ProfD said:

They are either homosexual or bisexual.

Is it normal ?

[ProfD]

1 hour ago, Delano said:

Was it normal ?

Is it normal ?

It has never been normal.

 

IMO, just because people have been engaging in abnormal activities for a long time doesn't normalize it.