All Activity

Isis is the equivalent of a gang. The Nigerian military has to out-number Isis in their country. Add in the Nigerian police. They should have been able to wipe out a handful of terrorists easily. Herein lies one of the *problems* for Black countries. When a man allows another man to fight his battles, he becomes a b8tch. These countries will never have true sovereignty as long as white folks are allowed to protect them.

@Chevdove...don't worry too much about it. The word gender from a social perspective allows humans to self-identify (boy, girl, man, woman, other). However, biology does not lie. Every human is born either male or female regardless of how they self-identify (gender). When the rubber meets the road, a human will be treated how they were born...male or female. The USA is the main country dealing with this gender self-identity BS. The current administration is trying to stomp it out.

Happy Belated Birthday Nichelle Nichols

Nigeria didn't have much of a choice BUT to go along with it. They weren't military strong enough to stop it and I doubt any other African nation would have came to their aid.

Let's call it for what it is..... Nigeria got pimp slapped. Nigeria claiming to "ok" this strike or even "ask" for it is just an effort to save face because in reality there wasn't much they could have done to stop it anyway. It's like that DJ Pooh in Friday trying to save face with Deebo by not asking for his bike back.......... He didn't ask for it back because he was AFRAID to. He knew Deebo would only give it back IF he wanted to and WHEN he wanted to and there wasn't shit he could do about it. He knew Deebo could easily beat his ass...lol. His ignorant ass father either didn't know or didn't understand this and tried to FORCE the boy to "stand up" for himself and demand the bike back and the results were as expected: The same situation applies to Nigeria. Trump was going to strike in Nigeria anyway whether the government agreed to it or not and there was little they could do to stop it. Them "objecting" to it or putting up some sort of resistance would have only made things work because they aren't militarily strong enough to do so. But there's another problem......... The REACTION so many Black podcasters are having over this strike. They sound like Pooh's silly ass father when they criticize Nigeria and call them weak or point the finger at them as if they actually could of done otherwise. It shows a level of insensitivity, ignorance, and immaturity that's I'm beginning to expect from them when it comes to criticizing other Black folks for doing or not doing things that THEY clearly aren't in a position to do either. "Why yall let America strike targets in your country like that? Why didn't yall fight back? Man,yall weak....see...that's why yall aren't respected by other nations! They wouldn't have done that to China! Africans need to learn how to be a military force to be respected and reconned with!" These same niggaz on podcasts criticizing Nigeria for "letting" Trump strike inside the country....if the police come up in THEIR house and slap them and their families around and lock them up....ain't shit THEY would be able to do about it besides sit there and cry. So many American Black folks have been beat up and shot down by the police and THEY didn't fight back, but they want to criticize Africans and other Black nations when racism harms them and THEY don't fight back. It is what it is. These Black folks didn't fight back because they weren't strong enough to. Calling themselves "fighting back" ...at this point...would have probably made the situation worse because America would have probably responded with a strike that would have decimated what military power they DO have! We can criticize people for selling out, especially when it's not necessary; however Black people need to stop this habit of attacking fellow victims of racism. It's clearly a cover or way to deal with their own misplaced feelings of helplessness.

Every race has experienced weight gain over the past few decades, however it appears that AfroAmericans and Latinos have experienced the most. A lot of it has to do with the ingredients IN the foods but I believe a lot of it has to do with the foods themselves. On top of the factors that you listed like not getting enough exercise.....our genetics is just different and this Western diet isn't good for most of us. Most Black people are lactose intolerant and shouldn't be drinking milk no matter what being put in it. Most Black people can't handle this large amount of bread and other starches and red meats that are part of a typical Western diet as well as most Whites. The same can be said of Latinos. Most Latinos are really Native Americans who practice a Spanish culture, but the Spaniards of Spain are predominately Caucasian and have different genetics. So you see these Mexicans and other central Americans who are fat and roundish looking because many of them have mixed in their indigenous diets with the Spaniard diet with lots of cheese, milk, red meat, and liquor.

POTUS OJ claimed Isis had been defeated years ago. Now, in retaliation for those 3 servicemembers being killed a couple weeks ago, they are striking targets. No surprise the Nigerian government was in agreement with the strikes. They don't care about Christians being killed by Isis. Otherwise, they would have handled the situation themselves. Follow the money.

Well, What about Nigeria!? I just heard that America sent missiles into Nigeria to deal with Christians being killed by Isis or some other religious group.

Me too. I would rather wait until it comes out online. Seriously!?

When did they change the definition of gender? AI Overview The definition of "gender" evolved significantly in the mid-20th century, moving from primarily grammatical or a polite synonym for "sex" (biological) to distinguishing social roles from biological sex, a shift driven by psychology in the 1950s/60s, popularized by feminists in the 1970s, and later encompassing individual identity and expression. This change wasn't a single event but a gradual linguistic and cultural shift, with the term gaining prominence and new meanings from the 1960s onward, especially differentiating it from "sex" (biological) to "gender" (social/identity). Ha! The Western World! But if/when it comes a time when a females are in an existence like it was thousands of years ago, then I suppose it is expected that males will forget these modern times and not fight a female like they would a male enemy? So now, 'gender' is a social construct and therefore some females can identify as being 'a male' in how she can 'marry' a female and 'play the role of a 'what'?-- But again, if this star 'the planet earth' abruptly changes our existence back to what it was like thousands of years ago, will these gender social constructs remain the same? If 'gender' is not based on the biological factor of sex organs and is now 'a social construct', then why is it a problem that this same western world use 'skin color' to develop 'Race identity' as a social construct. So, again, I want to clarify; Gender is still scientifically based on reproduction. Racial identity is still scientifically based on the genetics of skin color and also the presence of melanin in human skin. I also want to stress another point that I brought out earlier in the genetic presence of Primitive humans that proves that modern humans did intermix with Primitive humans and this is a very crucial factor in understanding the issue of both the genetics of 'skin color' and 'gender'. I have not shared much research on this issue because at this point, it is useless if other references about the genetics of skin color and sex is not understood. But I will say this though, as a Christian, that is the main topic of the entire Holy Bible; it revolves around 'the Original Sin' and how the issue of Skin Color and Gender is the main issue that has plagued this world. The intense hatred of the Great Adversary has against the Creator God and his Creation is based on the issue of White Supremacy and Colorism and Genderism. All of the prophets and the Children of God addressed this issue, whether they were dark skinned or light skinned, whether they were Ethiopian or Hittites, etc. all of the people of God addressed the issue of White Supremacy, Colorism, and Genderism. So no matter if governments today have changed the classifications of peoples based on skin color or not, nevertheless, skin color is only one factor out of several other factors that defined people by their cultures, ethnicity and nations, etc. And whether or not governments today say that a male can be defined as a female, nevertheless, genetically, if a human is born with male organs, then he is a male and his body will be distinct from a female from birth to maturity.

This is not my opinion as I have provided references many times. White Europeans did not come from Black Africans, but all modern humans, whether White Europeans or Black Africans come from one anatomically straight YDNA African male out of Africa; One reference is the International Genome Project. However, the presence of light skin, whether in Black Africans or White Europeans today is due to other factors, one of which is the result of mutation, etc. Because it is the Truth....they are descendants of Africans LOL If Black Americans allow you to come in a Black community with this kind of rhetoric, and not see how insane this is, then you should do it. However, it is definitely a spirit of White Supremacy for you to think that you can pushed this kind of information to Black Americans even with all of the thousands of years Black African people have suffered behind evil hatred and violence from White racist that have thousands of years defined themselves as being distinct apart from Black African people on the basis of reproducing to the point of mutating and not having almost any black melanin. I explained that in detail before in various ways and with references, one of which was the science and genetics of the Bay Horse. A Bay Horse is 'a red horse' but can have different coat colors and some almost look like they are black while some can look like they are white, however, their coat color is not true Black. That would be a dark horse for some bay horses. White a true black horse is pure 'eumelanin' in pigment in both his skin and coat color. I think I understand why you say this, however, due to reproduction and the human 'race' all albino people no matter how much or how little melanin they possess, nevertheless, they are born from humans that do have melanin and therefore, their mutation sill is dependent on reproduction and therefore, they come from humans that had some type of melanin and this is a key factor.

Well, I did research it. No, it is NOT originally a social role, but now I see why you have said that it is. I can now see that America and this Western world has changed this definition and so now, us Black folks that are Descendants of Slaves and once again been exploited. WOW! Only in this Western world. So now, White Supremacist ideas can feel comfortable entering into Black culture and think that they can tell us lies and we should accept it. LOL. I will put the references to this 'social change' in the definition of 'gender'. On 10/9/2025 at 11:13 PM, Chevdove said: There is NO other type of melanin. I said nothing about covering the body.... In the body is what I reference.... On 11/23/2025 at 10:18 AM, Chevdove said: There are absolutely no humans walking this earth with a third type of melanin in their whole body. So I already proved the existence of neuromelanin in the human body.. So let me get this straight; This thread is about the issue of Race and Racism with regards to skin color being used to define social construct and you want me to believe that you addressing 'neuromelanin' of which has nothing to do with this topic means that I am off topic? LOL. The spirit of supremacy is in this room!!! You want to be right so badly and find fault with me so badly that you would try to highlight my saying that there is only two type of melanin is off topic. Just because you did not refer to 'only melanin covering the body' of which is the topic of this thread, I should be cited for being wrong for only addressing the 'only two types of melanin covering the human body'? LOL.

Understand video was shot from a Black perspective. Otherwise, it highlights the reasons Americans of every race have become more over-weight in general. Portion control and High fructose corn syrup (HFCS) and the lack of exercise are three (3l of the main culprits for people being obese. Certain lifestyle choices and sedentary jobs and video games will definitely lead to weight gain. It's funny that people will make excuses for not going to the gym or getting some routine form of exercise but they will make time to binge watch TV or videos on their phones. Minimizing and/or eliminating physical education from schools is a huge mistake. Especially if the lunch period still exists. Still comes down to personal responsibility. Parents have to make healthy choices. Folks need to learn how to cook and shop for food that are not overly processed. Here's a few grocery shopping tips: 1) Buy fresh fruits and vegetables 2) If food contains ingredients and chemicals that cannot be pronounced, it should not be consumed. 3) Outer perimeter of grocery stores contain the healthiest choices. 4) Stay away from those frozen food refrigerators. Several decades ago, being over-weight was not cool or cute. Fat people especially young people were almost outcasts. Nowadays, folks can be fat and fabulous. They have chunky models on the runway. Fashion designers are pulling out more fabric and thread to make Big & Tall and Plus-sized clothes too. It's all fun & games until the doctor starts prescribing medications for the conditions that come with poor eating habits and obesity.

I too noticed the AfroAmerican community started gaining weight right around the early 80s.

Ok lets have your definition of "Gender"...? Gender is a Social Role I am not.... Gender is not biological but social If you have male genitalia....then you sex is male Regardless of your sex....gender is a social role No.... Lets us not switch it around or changed the facts as we presented them initially I said OCA1A Albinos have no Pheo or Eumelanin to which you responded See your quotes below Really!? That's news to me! On 10/9/2025 at 11:13 PM, Chevdove said: There is NO other type of melanin. I said nothing about covering the body.... In the body is what I reference.... On 11/23/2025 at 10:18 AM, Chevdove said: There are absolutely no humans walking this earth with a third type of melanin in their whole body. So I already proved the existence of neuromelanin in the human body.. The Three are Pheomelanin Eumelanin and Neuromelanin are so far found in the human body. The other two forms are not so far found in the Human Body. I just redirected your misdirection above...so far that is the extent of your word games as of now. Question did White Europeans come from Black Africans in your Opinion?..... Because it seems thats what you are saying....Whilst at the same time you are saying they did not. purview the following.... Posted August 16 Whether 'Irish Poles Jews, and Italians' have white skin or not, nevertheless, it would be their genetic origins and not only their phenotype that define their physical identity....... So for now, to say that Polish people or Poles are of the White race today, does not mean that they did not have Black African origins. To say that Irish people are of the White race today, does not mean that they did not have Black African origins. Posted October 11 Therefore, this is one main reason they know that black humans did not exist until after the manifestation of modern mankind. The origin of blue eyes is confirmed to start in one [black] male individual due to a mutation. Now, this is just one of other references that reveals that prior to modern humans, Primitive humans did not have black pigment. On 11/23/2025 at 10:35 AM, Chevdove said: White Supremacist hate the Creator for his creation of the Black anatomically Straight YDNA males. So therefore, they are obsessed with trying to define the White Race as existing without having to come through raping and reproducing with the Black Human Beings. Maybe not all of them are from Africa ..........but I believe the vast majority if not all are from Africa What color or pigmented skin did these primitive hominins have? Do Africans only have Nappy Hair? Because it is the Truth....they are descendants of Africans And we now know that to be a lie... I am setting the record straight.... The popular classic story is pure whitewash....lies Its primarily aeconomics I agree that the original humans are what today is considered black or African skin toned.... Khoi-San people are among if not the oldest human groupings in Africa and the world....they not exactly dark black. On the other hand the Aborigines of Australia are very dark and are also among the oldest... Yes In the context of our discussion...yes Yes Whether or not they had "nappy hair" if they originated in Africa they are Africans Finding them all over....means they can travel We are interested in their origin When Europeans move to America....they are still Europeans thought due to politics we call them Americans Whats the difference between very dark skin and black skin? if its not too much trouble please do again. I explained this above already,..,.you are creating a "strawman" I made no such claim. These movements are outgrowth of Socio-political ideology My motivation is the Truth So it all started when you were explaining to me how the primitive human light/pale skin has nothing to do with Albinism or White skin and that White Skin has nothing to do with Albinism SLC45A2 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24096233/ I think I was clarifying that OCA1A Albinos have no Pheo or Eumelanin and then I think you said those were the only two types/forms of melanin they are. I quote us below Some Albino I think have no eu/pheomelain..

Yes. It seems as if she's been making VERY sensible statements lately! Check out this genius in action: If she starts making any MORE sense.......stand up comedians will start using her as a muse....lol.

ProfD Back in those days, NWA was the Black CNN of the west coast just as Public Enemy was to the east coast. And speaking of Public Enemy....... Notice how skillfully some of the journalists kept trying to get them to diss Public Enemy or say something greasy about them to start a rift? None of them took the bait. I'm not sure if they recognized it as a trick of the enemy, or just legitimately didn't have any opinions about PE one way or the other. They also tried this tactic again by bringing up KRS One was well as mentioning their relationships with Eastcoast rappers in general. I think they were pretty successful in getting a few to talk about KRS One. I'm not sure if he responded to them.

Lol...by this statement, are you suggesting that George W. Bush was more legitimate and better for the nation? “There’s an old saying in Tennessee....I know it’s in Texas, probably in Tennessee too It says, fool me once, shame on. Shame on you. Fool me again....and uhhh....you can’t get fooled again.”

Well you "checked" with the wrong sources, because many people in this nation absolutely do NOT have the right to associate with whom they want. In some cases...it's actually illegal for them to do so.

You're directing that response to the wrong person....lol. That statement was a QUOTE, not my own.

nels Only 7 percent use Obamacare? I find that VERY hard to believe. That would mean that the other 93% of Americans are either on Medicare, Medicaid, or private insurance. Perhaps a majority may be....but not 93%.

Well without advertising them....maybe you can tell us where we can find online forums that ARE full of "enlightenment"....LOL. Wait, let me guess.... Instagram? Tiktok? Lol....everybody knows how "intellectually stimulating" and "enlightening" the content on THOSE platforms are! I wonder..... How much intellectual stimulation can you really expect from platforms designed for people who can't pay attention for more than 30 seconds???

Chev @Chevdove I'm not a fan of hers, but I do recognize that Arianna IS a great singer. Probably due to a number of factors, including: -Like so many White RnB artists, she grew up observing AfroAmerican singers and started imitating their style -She's of Italian descent so that African blood no doubt had contributed to her vocal muscles, rhythm, and talent in general. Remember, she sang at Aretha Franklin's funeral. I don't have a problem with HER personally; it's the movie itself that I take issue with. I do hear a little about appealing to the LBGT movement, but how? Without having seen the movie, one reason is because one of the main actresses....Cynthia Erivo....is either Lesbian or Bisexual. Anyway, I have not been to the movies in years, so I don't keep up with holidays blockbusters anymore. Don't worry, you ain't missing much. The only time I go is when I have to take somebody who wants to go....lol. Me personally, I'd rather wait until it comes out online and watch it at home on the big screen. But if you haven't been to a movie theater in years...one thing you might find surprising is the fact that they now serve LIQUOR in most theaters....lol.

Chev I didn't know that much about her. Since you mentioned it, I'll start paying a little more attention to her work.

Also, it's not good, the news about this lovely girl. I am so hurt. It turns out that she was hurt really bad. She suffered some kind of brain bleed and is still hospitalized. A few weeks ago, she was supposed to be returned to Jamaica but with a medical team and then taken directly to hospital. I am still praying for a full recovery. Miss Haiti, was given a hard time because she broke the news. She said that the contestants were taken back stage and told to keep it silent but that the pageant officials blamed Miss Jamaica for the fall.