Feminists and misogynists represent the extreme opposites when it come to views on many subjects. I suspect that the women dissing "The Birth of a Nation" are women from the feminist community. The film obviously has merit or it wouldn't have received critical praise, and it should not be totally dismissed because it offends certain females. Somewhere in the middle is probably the fairest assessment of this work. Nate Parker's acquittal of rape charges and his subsequent "repentance" count for something. Everybody makes mistakes. And women often cry "rape" to either to gain something from doing so or to feign innocence when caught in compromising positions.
Rape inspires such a knee jerk reaction, that it's hard to sort out. In my personal estimation, there's a difference between a female being sexually assaulted by a stranger, and the molestation of a provocative, sloppy drunk girl, voluntarily in the the company of horny young male acquaintances with no self-control. "No, doesn't mean "no" if you are too intoxicated to utter it. I know, I know, I'm making light of a serious subject; always a hazard when you are seeking the truth. And of course, my cynical attitude is why many women don't come forward after being violated under such circumstances because they end up becoming even more stressed from being made to feel that they are partly to blame for what happened when boys were being dogs. Non-consensual sex is invariable a "he did/she did" dilemma.
Hollywood favorites, Roman Polanski and Woody Allen come to mind as 2 celebs Hollywood perennially excused from accusations of their past "inappropriate behavior" with young girls. So Nate is not the first and will not be the last. Recently NBA star, Derrick Rose, beat the rape charges brought against him by a former girlfriend. High profile athletes seem to be particularly prone to such incidents. And, along these lines, Rolling Stone magazine is currently involved in a law suit for running a story about an anonymous college coed claiming to have been gang raped at a University of Virginia frat house. Her story turned out to be concocted and the repercussions from this have tainted the reputations of Rolling Stone, who had to print a retraction of it, the journalist who wrote the story, and a U. of Va. Dean who was crucified on social media for her handling of the case, and who is also the person suing this magazine. Dirty business.