Jump to content

richardmurray

Boycott Amazon
  • Posts

    2,414
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    91

Everything posted by richardmurray

  1. from Bloomsbury, learn more https://aalbc.com/tc/profile/6477-richardmurray/?status=2500&type=status
  2. more information https://aalbc.com/tc/profile/6477-richardmurray/?status=2500&type=status
  3. well, I don't think it is impossible, simply because, the USA is the kind of genre literature. All literature genres in the usa, rightly or wrongly, have many subgenres that cater to vaious communities. I Can see it.
  4. now03.jpg

    Title: Hovergirls physical version coming
    Artist: GDbee < https://gdbee.store/ >   aka Prinnay    
    Prior post 

    https://aalbc.com/tc/profile/6477-richardmurray/?status=2490&type=status
    GDBee Post
    https://aalbc.com/tc/search/?&q=gdbee&type=core_statuses_status&quick=1&author=richardmurray&search_and_or=or&sortby=newest

     

    preorder
    https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/hovergirls-geneva-bowers/1143848338
    her social list
    https://gdbee.carrd.co/

     

    FROM THE ARTIST

    I am SO excited to reveal the cover for the physical version of HoverGirls! It'll be hittin the shelves next summer!
    It's basically the webcomic completely redrawn, freshly edited, and with more story! I'm extremely proud of how it came out. The original will always be here but the new edition literally has 100 more pages of story, and 99% less typos
    If you love magical girls, struggling slice of life, parodies, and/or struggling slice of life magical girl parodies, you'll love HG, I promise!
    *It's being published by Bloomsbury in August 2024*

     

    now04.jpg

     

    now05.jpg

     

    now06.jpg

     

    now07.jpg

     

    now08.jpg

     

     

    1. richardmurray

      richardmurray

      FORUM POST

       

       

       

       

       

  5. Dark Academia

    The following is a question and answer I gave concerning the Dark Academia artistic theme.

    Do you have any favorite pieces of media that fit the dark academia theme?

    I can't say the following film is most beloved or most favorited by me, but I like the films: "the covenant" ... I recall an old legend, I do not know where it is cited online, I read it offline. The old legend, told my way,  says that in spain, under a mound somewhere, is a gateway to a classroom. In this classroom, a negative spirit teaches all the students spells pertaining to shadows. The students live there and at the end of the course, the student with the worst grades must stay , their soul locked their forever.

    How do you feel about dark academia as an aesthetic? Would you incorporate elements of it into your art or everyday life?

    In my mind dark academia and the modern goth artistic movements are similar. I am an open minded artist so I don't have any biases to any aesthetic. I am not one to dress in it, but it is fine if someone else does. I know people offline who are goth or have a similar taste.  In terms of my own work, I can't recall anything that is dark academia. But I have written quite a bit. I have written work that deals with people learning magic and doing negative things but I don't see that as dark academia. Just learning negative magic or powers doesn't equate to dark academia for me. IF so, then every sith student in star wards is an example of dark academia and I don't see it that way. I think the larger environment has to bound to the darkness. Having house slytherin doesn't make harry potter dark academia.  Now,  a story about Durmstrang, the rival school to hogwarts, that teaches the full spectrum of dark magic <if you want me to write something, message me>

    Share dark academia art in your comment, whether you made it yourself or a favorite artist did!

    I realized I have little to nothing in my deviantart galleries that fits dark academia... here is what I think fits, I am open to read your thoughts on whether you think it does or does not:) 

    the following is some art of mine I think is Dark Academia, what say you?

     

    https://www.deviantart.com/hddeviant/art/Promptpot2022Day10-932661347

     

    https://www.deviantart.com/hddeviant/art/Glasses-22-Witchtember-2022-930487371

     

    Feature
    https://www.deviantart.com/team/journal/Art-Feature-A-Guided-Tour-of-Dark-Academia-985975538

     

  6. yesterday they had on local television a celebration of the 100 , which i had no idea of, before presenting encanto and I thought to myself Disney probably will be only angry at one thing today. And that is how little competition Disney has garnered from other artist in the USA. Yes, Disney the firm, from Walt's time to now is competitive and likes to be the main/sole/primary cartoon source in the usa. But, Disney was correct when he spoke to the artists who wanted to strike years ago. Owning your own business is what he did to free himself from others, as an abused artist. He wanted his workers to do the same but most did not feel or have the strength to do that and I think workers still don't.

    now03.jpg

     

    ODe to disney

    https://www.deviantart.com/flapperfoxy/art/Disney-100-988789370

  7. American Fiction Is Coming (for the Book World’s Neck) By Zoe Guy, a news writer who covers film, TV, music, and celebrities So you want Black representation in novels? Well, only a certain kind of Black story will sell in American Fiction. Jeffrey Wright stars as Monk in the trailer for Cord Jefferson’s directorial debut. He’s a poindexter writer type, frustrated by the fact that stereotypical “urban” novels dominate the Black book market. Nothing could have prepared him for a stop on Sintara Golden’s (Issa Rae) book tour, where the Oberlin-educated writer slips into cartoonish AAVE to read an excerpt from her latest. “Where are our stories? Where is our representation?” she says before reading, “Yo, Sharonda! Girl, you be pregnant again?” A white woman in the audience gives a standing ovation. Monk might be just as upset over the minstrel-lite best sellers as he is over the fact that his own professorial books consistently flop. His ire leads him to jokingly write My Pafology, a book about a hardened gangster, based on the “true story” of his alter ego and pen name Stagg R. Leigh. To his shock, a publisher picks it up. Now, he must become the thing hates — a person who monetizes “Blackness” for white consumption. Worse, a white man just explained what a durag is on a call to discuss the book’s movie poster. The checks clearing might not be enough to tolerate all this. Jefferson’s satire is based on Erasure, Percival Everett’s 2001 novel. American Fiction lands in theaters in December. Stay tuned for real-life publishers asking, “Wait, is this movie about us?” URL https://www.vulture.com/article/american-fiction-trailer-cast-release-date.html MY THOUGHTS As a writer who knew and knows many Black Writers my problem with this film is the lack of a key point. No one is stopping anyone Black from buying the book of the Black writer played by Jeffrey Wright. No one. Jeffrey Wright's character isn't being blocked from making a book, it is on the market. It simply isn't selling. But whose fault is that. If a Black author publishes a book and it isn't selling then the Black book buying community either doesn't like it, hasn't found it, or didn't give it a chance. And the Black book buying community is free to do that but the idea that it is the white publishing firms who are to blame is false. Yes, white publishing firms support Black Urban Caricature literature. Yes, they do. But, in modern times, no one black has any excuse to not find Black literature in all flavors. No one black has any excuse in modern media to not find a work by a black author that suit their taste. Find it folks. And if Black book buyers or film goers need white media firms advertisement campaigns to give black work a chance or to find black works then the problem is black buyers. My answer to the first question above is a book called Capoeira and the original Sun man. I would add my high john the conqueror book, but I think it is too big a publisher. The second is over 50 . IN AMENDMENT The point of the film is the owners of media in the usa , the money, are white+ don't allow for enough width of opportunity for those not white , in particular black folk.. And that is 100% correct. But, outside violence, what is the answer? You can't tell someone how to use their private money so... the only answer that can be controlled by back people is the creation of black publishing companies. But in modernity , the tools to publish independently are greater than ever before, so a proliferation of work from all writers is out there. The ability to have a successful publishing company financially is tough. But the idea that white owned publishing firms simply need to extend their opportunity for non whites is for me, not culturally honest. The USA isn't Star Trek.
  8. topics Cento series round 21 Promptpot part 2 intro- can you describe the image in Scream? Adult variant of my work Criblore from Filled With Magic , perfect for the halloween season If You Made It This Far: Film noir cocktails with Eddie Mueller, thoughts on Ahsoka Tano, Ray Bradbury, Merit in media https://rmnewsletter.over-blog.com/2023/07/10/15/2023-rmnewsletter.html
  9. A group of eccentric characters learn different lessons in greed, lust, and desire as they encounter supernatural creatures in the enchanted muggy land of South Florida. It is a dark and spooky twist on the Black culture of South Florida. The FIRST TWO EPISODES are on Black Oak TV. And we will have weekly drops for all eight episodes leading up to Halloween. You can sign up for a free trial and experience the whole series streaming EXCLUSIVELY on Black Oak TV via desktop or the app. https://www.blackoak.tv/catalog/shows/criblore see more posts from filled with magic content https://aalbc.com/tc/search/?&q=moon ferguson&type=core_statuses_status&quick=1&search_and_or=and&sortby=relevancy
  10. now03.png

     

    A group of eccentric characters learn different lessons in greed, lust, and desire as they encounter supernatural creatures in the enchanted muggy land of South Florida. It is a dark and spooky twist on the Black culture of South Florida.

    The FIRST TWO EPISODES are on Black Oak TV. And we will have weekly drops for all eight episodes leading up to Halloween.

    You can sign up for a free trial and experience the whole series streaming EXCLUSIVELY on Black Oak TV via desktop or the app.

     

    https://www.blackoak.tv/catalog/shows/criblore

  11. haha @Chevdove you have exposed yourself:) i know how you got through elementary school test:) @Troy I meant to you, not even close, many great scary films are absent:)
  12. HEre is the answer key 1. The Rocky Horror Picture Show (Lips) 2. Halloween (The Pumpkin) 3. The Mummy (Bandages) 4. Scream (Black Ghost with White mask) 5. The Shining (Tricycle) 6. Beetle Juice (Black White Striped suit) 7. The Nightmare on Elm Street (Striped Tshirt with Hat mannequin) 8. Shaun of the Dead (Bat and Shovel) 9. Gremlins (Paws in the box) 10. The Sixth Sense (Red Knob of door) 11. The Purge (Peeking Masked man) 12. Poltergeist (Girl with hands on TV) 13. Ghostbusters (Bagpack below lamp post) 14. The Evil Dead (Girl coming out of ground) 15. The Exorcist (Silhouette under lamp post) 16. Alien (Egg Flower shaped object) 17. Ring (The girl coming out of well) 18. Christine (The Car) 19. Blair Witch Project (Stick symbol above the car) 20. The Amityville Horror (House above behind car) 21. Arachnophobia (Spider on tree) 22. Dracula (The Castle) 23. Fog (Mist behind Castle) 24. Frankenstein (Angry mob on hill) 25. Wicker Man (Burning mummy statue) 26. IT (Red Balloon) 27. Silence of the Lambs (Insect on the lamp) 28. Wolf Creek (Wolf yellow road Sign) 29. An American Werewolf in London (Slaughtered lamb sign) 30. Psycho (Bates Motel) 31. Annabelle (Doll rocking on chair) - Also Conjuring 32. Little Shop of Horrors (Mushnik's Shop) 33. Hellraiser (Box in Window) 34. The Lost Boys (Green Frog Comics) 35. Saw (Mask with red cheeks) 36. Friday the 13th (White Mask in window) 37. Child's Play (Chucky) (Doll in attic window) 38. The Addams Family (Thing - hand) 39. 28 Days Later (biohazzard sign on Chimney) 40. Sleepy Hollow (Headless man in front of moon) not even close:) the uninvited, the haunting , don't look now are all not in no hocus pocus @Chevdove
  13. What is the lesson in Palestine?

     

    Two 

    1)don't trust foreigners with your soveriegnity

    2)don't invite immigrants who don't share your culture

     

    The British opened the door for Eruopean Jews to enter Palestine eventually, the UA supplied said Jews with all the support they could muster and more. And said JEws took over Palestine with assitance from the uunited states of america + the united kingdom and made it Israel

     

    The past can not be changed. And people lose homes, ask the Native American who for centuries has lived in the USA as the palestinean in Israel. But the question for the PAlestinean as the Native american is what will you do knowing the truth. Your home was stolen by an oppoent militaristically more powerful than you. 

     

    Some palestineans as Native Americans give up on what was their own. But not all NAtive Americans and all the power to them. Ask the Irish Republican Army, which wasn't many people but were committed. Was the death/war/chaos worth it? 100% 

    Getting back your land from an invader may take hundreds or thousands of years, but never give up, even when all your neighbors , so called kin, don't support you, never give up. And eventually, you will get your chance. Sacrifice all for what was taken. Share nothing with a thief. 

     

    now06.png

     

    the photo shows a ship named the Theodor Herzl, which was used in a campaign to transport, illegally, Jewish refugees from Europe to a geopolitical entity controlled at the time by the British, known as Mandatory Palestine. The photo shows the refugees detained at a port, Haifa, in what is now modern-day Israel.

    That effort, known as Aliyah Bet, saw tens of thousands of Jewish refugees attempt to enter Palestine. Between August 1946 and May 1948, according to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, "the British government intercepted more than 50,000 Holocaust survivors seeking to resettle in Palestine," and "interned these survivors in detention camps established on the Mediterranean island of Cyprus."

    The voyage of the Theodor Herzl was one of many attempted Aliyah Bet emigrations intercepted by the British government. Noted Holocaust survivor and memoirist Alicia Appleman-Jurman was among its over 2500 passengers. In her book Alicia: My Story, she described the ship being overtaken by British ships:

    Doggedly our ship plowed forward, trying to get as close to shore as possible before the frigates surrounded us completely. But ours was only a leaky old cargo ship: the frigates were the products of modern warfare.

    It didn't take long for them to bring us to a halt. I had learned enough English to understand every word suddenly coming on from a bullhorn. I knew they were announcing their intent to board us. A few moments of silence followed the British announcement.

    Then we heard the voice of our captain speaking note the loudspeaker. "This is the ship Theodor Herzl," he said in English. The people on board are Jewish survivors of the Nazi concentration camps. They wish to return to the land of their ancestors. There are many children on this ship who are sick; most are orphans. They wish to rejoin their people. Let us come home."

    Several reports of the Theodor Herzl's detention made international news, and several photos of the banner at issue in the photograph are in the Getty Images library and tie it to the ship's April 1947 detention in Haifa. An April 14, 1947 report in the Manchester Daily News in the U.K. described the event this way:

    Refugees aboard the illegal immigrant ship Theodor Herzl destroyed the ship's engines when [their] resistance to a Royal Naval boarding party was useless off the Palestine coast early today. Destroyers had to tow the ship into Haifa.

    Six of the wounded refugee Jews interviewed in hospital today said that there was some opposition when they were intercepted by a British destroyer off Tel Aviv. The refugees tried to throw the first two British sailors climbing up to the captain's bridge back into the sea but they did not succeed.

    The boarding party, they added, used tear gas and fired several shots which wounded some of the refugees. They said they believed two were killed, but this was not confirmed from other sources.

    After a brief detention in Haifa, the refugees were taken to Cyprus. "No matter what the British called it, although it was not a Nazi camp, it was a concentration camp and it was a prison," Appleman-Jurman wrote in her memoir.

    The formation of the State of Israel brought an end to the Cyprus detention camps. "For most of those survivors interred on Cyprus, the experience only served to strengthen their resolve to reach Palestine," the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum wrote, "which they almost all did following the creation of Israel in May 1948."

    now07.jpg

     

    I repeat, never trust your home to a stranger + never allow strangers in your company, the historical lesson of the native american + the palestinean

  14. Too see some movies not present in the image https://aalbc.com/tc/profile/6477-richardmurray/?status=2492&type=status
  15. @ProfD the movie was a financial failure but Roger Corman admitted this was an art film, which he was able to barely afford, but he wanted to do. Comprehend this movie had to be a loser. Shatner's character didn't die? the rich guy of the town wasn't convicted of some crime. The black guy didn't become a hero. The truth is, the intruder speaks to the truth of alof of interracial situations in modern humanity. It is the same as the pawnbroker with rod steiger. The populace in the usa: white black or other, likes convenience. Likes narratives. Any art that goes against narrative is rarely liked. If the matrix ended with neo being killed and the system rebooting and then in some far date in the future, the sun returns and the machines don't need the matrix for power, that would bea downer. audiences like a set narrative.
  16. The Scientific Case for Two Spaces After a Period
    A new study proves that half of people are correct. The other is also correct.

    By James Hamblin

    now05.png

    photo by Tina Fineberg / AP

    MAY 11, 2018

    This is a time of much division. Families and communities are splintered by polarizing narratives. Outrage surrounds geopolitical discourse—so much so that anxiety often becomes a sort of white noise, making it increasingly difficult to trigger intense, acute anger. The effect can be desensitizing, like driving 60 miles per hour and losing hold of the reality that a minor error could result in instant death.

    One thing that apparently still has the power to infuriate people, though, is how many spaces should be used after a period at the end of an English sentence.

    The war is alive again of late because a study that came out this month from Skidmore College. The study is, somehow, the first to look specifically at this question. It is titled: “Are Two Spaces Better Than One? The Effect of Spacing Following Periods and Commas During Reading.”

    It appears in the current issue of the journal Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics. As best I can tell, psychophysics is a word; the Rochester Institute of Technology defines it as the “study of the relationship between stimuli (specified in physical terms) and the sensations and perceptions evoked by these stimuli.” The researchers are also real. Rebecca Johnson, an associate professor in Skidmore’s department of psychology, led the team. Her expertise is in the cognitive processes underlying reading. As Johnson told me, “Our data suggest that all readers benefit from having two spaces after periods.”

    “Increased spacing has been shown to help facilitate processing in a number of other reading studies,” Johnson explained to me by email, using two spaces after each period. “Removing the spaces between words altogether drastically hurts our ability to read fluently, and increasing the amount of space between words helps us process the text.”

    In the Skidmore study, among people who write with two spaces after periods—“two-spacers”—there was an increase in reading speed of 3 percent when reading text with two spaces following periods, as compared to one. This is, Johnson points out, an average of nine additional words per minute above their performance “under the one-space conditions.”

    This is a small difference, though if a change like this saved even a tiny amount of time, or prevented a tiny amount of miscommunication, the net benefit across billions of people could be enormous. Entire economies could be made or broken, wars won or lost.

    Or so it would seem. The conclusions she drew from that data pushed people into their corners on social media, where they dealt with it in variously intense ways.

    Justin Wolfers, a professor of economics and public policy at the University of Michigan, tweeted in reference to the study: “Science can blow your mind sometimes, and this time it has come down on the side of two spaces after a period.”

    Nicholas Christakis, a professor at Yale University, wrote: “Hurray! Science vindicates my longstanding practice, learned at age 12, of using TWO SPACES after periods in text. NOT ONE SPACE. Text is easier to read that way. Of course, on Twitter, I use one space, given 280 characters.”

    There’s a lot going on in that tweet, but you get the idea.

    Others were less ecstatic. Robert VerBruggen, the deputy managing editor at National Review, shared the study with the comment: “New facts forced me to change my mind about drug legalization but I just don’t think I can do this.”

    My colleague Ian Bogost tweeted simply, “This is terrorism.”

    Full disclosure: I also shared a screenshot of the study’s conclusion that “the eye-movement record suggested that initial processing of the text was facilitated when periods were followed by two spaces.” I said about this only, “Oh no.”

    I find two spaces after a period unsettling, like seeing a person who never blinks or still has their phone’s keyboard sound effects on. I plan to teach my kids never to reply to messages from people who put two spaces after a period. I want this study’s conclusion to be untrue—to uncover some error in the methodology, or some scandal that discredits the researchers or the university or the entire field of psychophysics.

    So let’s look for that. Because this really does matter: In a time of greater and greater screen time, and more and more consumption of media, how do we optimize the information-delivery process?

    In much the same way that we’re taught to write in straight lines from left to right, most of us have been taught that one way of spacing is simply right, and the other is wrong. Less often are we taught to question the standard—whether it makes sense, or whether it should change. But what is the value of education if not to teach children to question the status quo, and to act in deliberate ways that they can justify with sound, rational arguments?

    Such an argument is extremely difficult to make when it comes to sentence spacing, because the evidence is not there for either case. The fact that the scientifically optimal number of spaces hasn’t been well studied was odd to Johnson, given the strength of people’s feelings on the subject. The new American Psychological Association style guidelines came out recently, and they had changed from one space to two spaces following periods because they claimed it “increased the readability of the text.” This galled Johnson: “Here we had a manual written to teach us how to write scientifically that was making claims that were not backed with empirical evidence!”

    She was intrigued and designed the new study “to add some scientific data to the conversation.”

    Her rationale for two spaces gets complex—verging into the domain of rather high-level psychophysical theory (email me). As the researchers explain it, it’s all about mechanics of the eye, and what causes us to trip up or pause, even for a split second. In the current study, when text was presented with two spaces after periods, some readers’ eyes were more likely to jump over the “punctuation region” and spend less unnecessary time fixated on it. The extra space seemed to make it easier for readers to “extract the lines and curves from the text.” The space also comes into the periphery of one’s vision before it arrives, and that helps to signal that the sentence is wrapping up.

    The Skidmore study was small and less than definitive—essentially dipping a toe into a long-unquestioned practice. There were only 60 subjects, and they were all college students—meaning they were probably more interested in “hooking up” and “Snapchat” than actually reading. (Ed.: This is too much editorializing, apologies.)

    Most importantly, the effects appeared early in processing, and spacing did not affect overall comprehension. And that’s what reading is all about, no? The fact that our eyes may move a little faster is less important than whether the concepts make it into our brains.

    “It’s not like people COULDN’T understand the text when only one space was used after the periods,” Johnson said. “The [human] reading system is pretty flexible, and we can comprehend written material regardless of whether it is narrowly or widely spaced.”

    Angela Chen at The Verge also gave a pointed critique of the methodology:

    The two-space convention is left over from the days of typewriters. Typewriters allot the same amount of space for every character, so a narrow character like i gets as much as a wider character like w. (This is called a mono-spaced font.) With a typewriter, it makes sense to add an extra space to make it clear that the sentence has ended. Today’s word-processing software makes fonts proportional, though, which is why we only need one space. Also, it looks better. The Chicago Manual of Style and the Modern Language Association Style Manual also take this stance.

    “I’ve gotten a lot of flak for using a mono-spaced font (Courier New) in the study,” said Johnson. Her defense is that most eye-tracking studies use monospaced fonts, and that many word-processing systems still, in practice, act like typewriters (in that they don’t add additional space between sentences even when using proportional fonts; to increase the amount of space between sentences relative to the amount of space between any two words within the sentence, two physical spaces are still needed following the period). “Although I agree that future research should look at these effects using other types of fonts, research in this area suggests that font differences in general are small or nonexistent.”

    Even in the studies where researchers have removed interword spaces altogether, reading comprehension is still very high. For example, Thai and Chinese are typically written without spaces between words, even though studies have found that when space is added between words, reading speed increases. The standard comes down to aesthetics, tradition, conservation of paper and space—basically, the fact that reading is an act of much more than information delivery.

    I’ve written before about the effect of color gradients on reading, and how it goes against the findings of science that our words should be in a single color, usually black and usually on a near-white background, and usually presented in lines of a certain length. This is all a matter of tradition and style, not optimal information transfer. This standard does not work well for everyone. It’s why I thought, for a long time, that I didn’t like books. I wasn’t good at the mechanics of reading. When I found text-to-speech programs and actual audiobooks, it was like finally seeing the turtle in one of those Magic Eye posters that everyone else at the party saw hours ago.

    All of this is to say that if we really wanted to do evidence-based delivery of text for maximum comprehension, it wouldn’t be like debating one space or two. It would look totally different: words spewing into your face by some sort of torrent that syncs with feedback about your perception, and slows or pauses when you are distracted, and speeds up when you are bored.

    Still, this has been a good exercise in challenging beliefs, at least for me. What is important is that this question not be what breaks us—that Americans remember that we are united by the ideals of democracy, freedom, liberty, and justice that we still hold dear, and which demand our allegiance above any person or party or spacing issue.

    James Hamblin, M.D., is a former staff writer at The Atlantic. He is also a lecturer at Yale School of Public Health, a co-host of Social Distance, and the author of Clean: The New Science of Skin.

     

    URL
    https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/05/two-spaces-after-a-period/559304/


    MY RESPONSE

    As a writer I used and use grammatical techniques that are uncommon; I received and receive negative commentary in response to said use. But, what is the most potent issue? The most potent issue isn't who is right or wrong. The most potent issue is fear of no norm/standard. I find many people in various arenas are standardphiles or standard fanatics. 

    I give the following examples: a sports team succeeds in lifting a trophy using a strategy deemed outdated, a writer composes a story that buyers embrace that doesn't utilize common expectations for characters, a person lives comfortably while not acting to the life script all others have around them. 

    The problem isn't right or wrong, it is the fear of not being able to say who is right or wrong. This fear is huge. When a person whose forebears were enslaved in the usa to whites, says kill whites/kill the usa. The normal /standard response by most blacks or whites in the usa living at the time of this writing is something negative, around the terms: shame on you, you know better, judge individually, we are all family. But what if.... they are allowed? Notice I didn't say right or wrong. What if the condemnation is wrong ?  It isn't an issue of opinions but applied opinion. Applied opinion breeds consensus , creates the standards or norms. 

    All know this. But how big is africa? who is american? who are immigrants to the usa? who are white? Absent applied opinion, the peer pressure is gone, and people are freer to do as they want, even against a majority as individuals. 

    To writing, it doesn't spell the end of literature, but spells the end of critiques. Judgement requires laws which are attempts as an enforced standard or norm, which themselves are built on applied opinions. 

    The reaction in the article from others is the purest example. They fear someone not caring what they say, and being surrounded by others who don't care too. 

    Thus, the individualism, at least in the usa,  becomes true, not the mirror of white european descended, pan religious, empowerment that it is. 

  17. Boo Movies for Halloween

    any suggestions, please comment

     

    Cat People 1942

     

    The Seventh Victim 1943

     

     

     

    The Uninvited 1944

     

    The Picture of Dorian Grey 1945

     

    The Picture of Dorian Gray - 1945 from Daniel on Vimeo.

    Night of the Hunter 1955

     

    Invasion of the Body Snatchers 1956

     

    The House on Haunted Hill 1959

     

    Eyes without a face 1960

     

     

    The Innocents 1961

     

    The Haunting 1963

     

    Hour of the Wolf 1968

     

    Night of the Living Dead 1968

     

     

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...