Troy

Pioneer, I've previously shared tons of information about the fact that there is only one race. If I repost the information it will have not have a different effect on you--you've made up your mind. The problem with "race" is the colloquial use of the term here in the United States muddles its technical meaning. I'm not going to debate the use of the term with you. I've previously related that the term has no basis in our genetics, but you've rejected the known science. So the conversation is really over. Now I feel we should as a society should stop using racial terms like Black and white and I completely understand why someone would would disagree this because it is just my opinion. But once people start disagreeing with science. I have to learn to stop debating folk. Again this is like debating with someone about evolution versus creation... there are simply better things to do.

Del, my Brother, I have moved on from trying to convince you to agree with 97% of the scientist on the issue of climate change. This is a different conversation. I know I can't help you see reality. I'm just trying to understand why I've failed. I can tell by your bullet points that you did not watch the video, because several of the points listed were directly addressed--indeed that was the point of the video to address the concerns of climate change deniers. The answer I would give you would come from the science as related in the video. I doubt the video will change your perspective, you are too dug into your beliefs. I have to admit it would be interesting to learn why you are so rigidly opposed the science and so easily drawn to conspiracies.

Del, since you failed to point out what I wrote that was inaccurate, I'll take it that to mean you retract the allegation that I misrepresented what you wrote. If you are talking about the question you asked from the other conversation; I chose not to answer it. You've already made it clear there is nothing that I could write that would change your position. I posted a video there that I felt could explain things more simply, but not surprisingly it had no impact. As a result, I decided to more on. The video I posted here was really not about you specifically. Sure I mentioned you by name but that was because I wanted alert you in hopes that you would watch the video. Keep in mind there are actually other people who read these posts, I decided to share the video, because I know I'm not the only one puzzled that otherwise intelligent people would deny science. Did you watch the video Del? Indeed did you even watch the other video?

“Amazon’s business practices are scorched-earth capitalism.” —author Dennis Lehane Amazon is a destructive force in the world of bookselling. Their business practices undermine the ability of independent bookstores—and therefore access to independent, progressive, and multicultural literature—to survive. Additionally, Amazon is harmful to local economies, labor, and the publishing world. Read more at Social Justice Books

How Independent Bookstores Have Thrived in Spite of Amazon.com Ryan Raffaelli set out to discover how independent bookstores managed to survive and even thrive in spite of competition from Amazon and other online retailers. His initial findings reveal how much consumers still value community and personal contact.

@Delano, explain how I misrepresented your position. What did I write that was inaccurate? Del did you watch the video?

This well help you understand why people like @Delano and 40% of Americans, some very well "educated," are deniers of man made climate change and why those who believe the science not not moved to do anything about it. There are many videos and books on the subject of why people deny science. They explain why people reject the efficacy of vaccinations or even evolution. I've taken a keener interest in this subject recently because when trying to explain the downside of say an Amazon monopoly or the adverse effects Facebook's dominance of internet, I fail. I tend to come at people with data and facts. You really have to find some common ground and appeal to people on an emotional basis. Obviously climate change is a FAR more serious problem than Facebook or Amazon could ever be, but they all three share the characteristic of not being perceived as immediate problem. Facebook and Amazon can actually be dealt with in the future, climate change, however, is unique in that if we wait too long to actually deal with it; there will come a time when it will become too late for humanity. Some believe we have already reached that tipping point.

Hey @Delano watch this video on climate change (climate science: what you need to know). And let me know if it changes you mind in the least bit?

Well the first question is easy I recognize that what I believe is not the same as what everyone else believes. I also knw operating in the world in which there are white racists (and Black ones too), I have to behave accordingly like setting up websites which I hope will tell both Black and white people we are not inferior. I'm glad you are not becoming a grammarnazi or using typos as part of your argument.

Harry we must be on the same wavelength. I just added Vashti Harrison's work to the website. How did you learn about this book? Little Leaders: Bold Women in Black History by Vashti Harrison

@Pioneer1 what I wrote would appear to be a contradiction to your because you reject the scientific meaning of race. Yes, skin color is based upon one's genetics--but not race, because there is only one race. To Harry's point (and perhaps yours). I'm not naive to the fact that a white racist does not consider science. They see my Black face and they feel hatred. They could give too shits if we have a common enemy in the plutocracy. For the racist, perhaps most white folks, race trumps class. Race trump gender. Race even trumps nationality. Some Black people like to exclaim, "Black people are not a monolith." Of course this is true, but when the klansman is putting the noose around your neck, or the racist cop is gunning you down, he does not care about that; all he sees is a less-than-human Black person. This racist attitude is completely understanding, given the fact the racism is built into the American culture. This website exists in direct reaction to white racism. The fact that there is only one race will not end racism. Too many people reject science and are unwilling to shed old ways of thinking. I guess this is natural too; we are human.

Yes, you have it human and race are synonymous. What you describe as race are various forms of skin color, ethnicities nationalities, that are applied differently at different times across different cultures. It is a human construct with no basis in our genetics. We can communicate much more clearly and perhaps have a better understanding of each other if we got rid of the concept of racial differences in Homo sapiens sapiens.

What does DTC mean, "Direct/discount to Consumer?" When I went to the Amazon store I installed the app. You really have to do it. I later uninstalled it because I don't ever intend to buy a book from an Amazon physical bookstore--boycott or not. The data these aps collect is very valuable, so I get the incentive The other problem is all these apps sap storage space and battery life from cell phones.

No lets stick with with yes or no Del. Do you understand the climate better than the vast majority of scientists? One can find alternative evidence to anything on the web. Sometimes conspiracy theories can be quote convincing

Again Del, it is not MY OPINION you take issue with, it is that of the majority of the worlds scientists you have a problem with. I can't prove that genetics that shows that there is only one human race. I have neither the equipment, knowledge, or time to prove any of this stuff. And this despite what you think and claim neither do you my friend. Do you believe their is only one human race? Can your prove it? Of course not. You must rely on what others who are more knowledgeable tell you. Once you start questioning the data I have access to and questioning MY scientific knowledge your argument is no better than Pioneer's.

Humm..., so you understand the climate better than the majority of scientists Del, yes or no?

I just gt an email from someone who called Thanksgiving day: 'National Sit Down to Break Bread & Pray with White People Before They Murder You, Your Family & Community & Take Your Land Day.'

Lighten up @Pioneer1. Obviously the holidays is a time for consumers to enrich corporations. But is also a time for family to get together. The day off makes it possible for more people--not all--to spend time with family and friends. I'm not a fan of turkey and did not eat any yesterday. I won't be shopping on the corporate created holidays (Black Friday) or on Monday (cyber Monday) because I don't really have extra money and I really don't need anything. I have no reverence for the pilgrims. The spending time with family and friends is what I enjoy. Were you able to spend time with family or friends on Thanksgiving?

Del stop. You write with way too many typos to demand such stringency from anyone. On one hand you demand absolute rigidity as it pertains to math, while at the same time, you far less stringent when it comes to science particularly when it comes to our collective knowledge on climate change. Pioneer you demand absolute proof when someone disagrees with you but when someone asks you a simple question like who created your creator you say that it does not matter. This make it illogical to debate with your because you are inconsistent. Perhaps, @Pioneer1, inconsistency is where you and @Delano have found common ground.

MahoganyBooks Bookstore is hosting a “first look” of its bookstore to supporters and the Anacostia community on December 4th from 6:30 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. Derrick and Ramunda are my peeps I've been working with them for years. They were a reporting source along with AALBC.com for the, now defunct, Power List Bestsellers (discussed in the video below).

I have an open mind and like to ponder too, but if someone said the world was flat, or that Black people were genetically inferior to white people I'd have to disagree with them. All of this stuff has been proven not to be true. The miniscule minority of scientists who understand how the universe works but still believe in intelligent design are a very odd bunch. Look, you can find "scientists" who believe anything. Putting these wingnuts on par with the vast majority of the rest of the scientific community does it a disservice. That is like saying all Black people have a higher propensity for criminality because so many of us are imprisoned. Of course there is an answer to how the universe was created, but no one knows it. Physicist have figured out a lot in the last 100 years, but they don't know what happen at the big bang, what goes on inside a black hole, what dark matter and dark energy are, they can ponder, come up with different theories, and maybe at some point before the universe dies, they'll figure it out. I just listened to a lecture given by a quantum physicist who was describing field theory. I'll try to describe it a nutshell, and I'm sure I'll butcher the proper definition so forgive me: a particle is actually everywhere, but snaps into a known position when we observe it.

This platform was created on November 8. Beining Tuesday, November 28th, I start inviting, survey participants who expressed an interest in supporting a boycott, booksellers, and readers to join this club.

@Delano we are differing on the definition of the word "valid." The definition says based upon logic or fact. So technically you are right. But this is a technically, and at this point unnecessary, as I have already reworded my question (which @Pioneer1 continues to dodge). Pioneer makes declarative statements on premises that are either; patently false (which I assert is illogical, or just dumb, as in the case of multiple races), or which can not be proven to be true (as in the case with there being a creator (implying an very powerful sentient entity) of the universe. Now all I've done is ask @Pioneer1 to respond to a question which I think will expose a flaw in his reasoning (perhaps that is why he is dodging it), and you are bogging this down in technicalities. As far as you send question about how an opinion can be invalid, I already answered that question. Is anything still unclear? Del, do your think there was a creator of the universe Del? If not, why not. If so, why? val·id ˈvaləd/ adjective (of an argument or point) having a sound basis in logic or fact; reasonable or cogent. "a valid criticism" synonyms: well founded, sound, reasonable, rational, logical, justifiable, defensible, viable, bona fide;More

This video was originally Published on Nov 21, 2017 on What's The 411. In this video, Ruth J. Morrison, CEO and Executive Producer, What's The 411TV; and Troy Johnson, President, and Webmaster, AALBC.com; discuss Amazon's detrimental effect on the Black book ecosystem and how digital search has and is affecting Black web properties.