Shannon. Sharpe. What's. Going. On. ???

[harry brown]

Shannon. Sharp.   This. Is. A. White. Female. ?  News. Says. He. Got. Involve. With. Her. When.  She. Was. 19. ....ESPN. Was. He. Fired. Or. Did. He.  Stop.  Talking. On. ESPN.  Till. This. Is. Over. ..News. Says. ,,,She. Wanted. 50.  Fifty. Million.  Dollars. ?  Tape. Of. Him. And. Her. Talking. Was. Released. .. I. Think. News. Says. He. Raped. Her.  ...He. On. Tape. Saying.  He. Wants. Her  To. Wear. A. Dog. Collar. ???.   This. Sounds. Like. Puffy. Combs. .. Wild. Freak. Offs. ........Was.  Shannon. Sharp.  Going. To. Pay. Her. 50. Million. Dollars. .  .?  .....The. Tape. Of. Them. Talking.  .These,,,Wealthy. Celebrity.   ,Black. Men. ........???

[ProfD]

Shannon Sharpe is the latest celebrity Black man to be targeted by attorney Tony Buzbee who likes to file nuisance lawsuits against rich Black men.

 

Buzbee is the same attorney who went after DeShaun Watson, Diddy and Jay-Z. 

 

Despite Sharpe having had an ongoing relationship with his accuser with text messages and video, the attorney is pursuing the case as if Sharpe violated her.

 

Interestingly enough, Shannon Sharpe was set to get a $100 million bag for his broadcasting services.  Remains to be seen how this lawsuit plays out and how it affects his money.

 

Black men especially those who have money really need to 1) stop believing they have the same privileges as white men, 2)  do a better job of protecting themselves from predators and 3) more importantly....learn how to fight back.

[Pioneer1]

 

I don't like what's been going on lately with these famous/wealthy Black men being hemmed up for fucking with White women.
This is the REAL "high tech lynching" that Uncle-Tom Thomas complained about years ago.


Do we see what's going on here???

On ONE end, they are trying to encourage Black women to get into sexual relationships with White men.
And on the OTHER end, they're trying to intimidate Black men (with the threat of financial ruin or legal problems) to "stay away" from White women.

That's why I Iike what ProfD said about learning how to "fight back".

Already on the internet you have some silly sell-outs talking about:

 

"See!
That's what they GIT for messing dem white womenz!!!"


They're putting the blame on BLACK MEN for doing what MEN do...which is screw women (regardless of race)....instead of seeing thist as targeted racism and an attempt to scare Black men away from White women and box them into a corner of social isolation.

We can't let that shit happen.

We can't let them take the society back 200 years where White dudes could go around snatching up and fucking any Black woman they see but if a Black man just LOOKED at a White woman longer than 1 minute....they're already tying nooses.

We need all Black attorneys on deck and as many Black men in law enforcement to deal with this shit before it gets anywhere NEAR approaching that level.

[Troy]

I have not followed this story and have no interest in it honestly.  You guys seemed completely convinced that homeboy is innocent, why?  

 

It is not like Shannon Sharpe is a Bill Cosby or an MLK caught up in a sex scandal, in a position to elevate Black people.  He is just a dude that talk shit on a podcast.  Last I heard we was gossiping about Puffy with Katt Williams and live streaming the audio of him banging someone...

[aka Contrarian]

Shannon should've honored the fine line between rough sex and sexual abuse.  

He is not a gentleman. 

[Pioneer1]

3 hours ago, Troy said:

I have not followed this story and have no interest in it honestly.  You guys seemed completely convinced that homeboy is innocent, why?  

 

 

I'm going to keep it real with you and say (type...lol) something that you may find a bit shocking, even from me.....

I DON'T GIVE A DAMN if he's guilty of innocent.

I seriously don't.

I haven't followed the story much either and don't care to because I don't want these fucking demons legitimizing their lynchings.

Men screw women.
That's what men do and we've been doing it SINCE humanity.
I don't condone rape or sexual assault period, but I can't trust what these devils say.
Even if Shannon came on and APOLOGIZED for doing....whatever they claimed he did...I'm STILL not going to believe it.
I'll say he's just a CLONE talking or maybe they PAID him or THREATENED him to admit it.
I'm serious, I'm not going along with this crap.

It's getting out of hand with the "going after Black men for having sex" with women.
No Asian men getting caught up.
No Arab men getting caught up.
How many Latino men are getting caught up???
But every day you got some brutha with his picture on the screen.

I don't care WHAT they accused my brutha of...I'm not going to believe them.

They charged Elijah Muhammad and Martin Luther King of sexual infidelity and guess what?
....I don't believe THAT either!
I did entertain it slightly at one time, but not anymore.
Both of those men are INNOCENT as far as I'm concerned.
I don't give a damn how much "evidence" they present I won't believe it  because of WHO the "evidence" is coming from -Satan.


We talked about the LGBT community in the other thread.
Notice how you don't hear headlines about Black men being sued or arrested for sexual activities with MEN of any race?
So it's alright for a Black man to have sex as long as it's GAY sex, according to some in this society.
They'll leave him alone then.
 

[ProfD]

2 hours ago, Troy said:

I have not followed this story and have no interest in it honestly.  You guys seemed completely convinced that homeboy is innocent, why?  

I believe Shannon Sharpe is innocent to the extent that he and his accuser had s8x multiple times.

 

Also, there is a chain of text messages back and forth between them where the accuser is initiating it. 

 

Even if she said *no* 1 time out of 100, they have a history there.  Why the lawsuit all of a sudden?

 

Between the lawyer involved and timeframe, something doesn't add up. 

 

This thing will be get dropped way before it hits the courtroom.  Not before it spreads mud on Shannon Sharpe though. 

 

These n8gglets need to be serious about 1) getting signed NDAs (Non-Disclosure Agreements) and 2) paying for escort services.

 

These dudes have enough money to pay high-class prostitutes. Stop shopping for snatch box in the bargain bin at Dollar Tree.  

[Pioneer1]

1 hour ago, ProfD said:

This thing will be get dropped way before it hits the courtroom.  Not before it spreads mud on Shannon Sharpe though. 

 

It's not just about Shannon though.....
It's clearly part of a larger agenda.

And why in the HELL would you name you son "Shannon"????
What kind of shit is that?

What goes through the MINDS of some of these sistaz when they're naming their kids.

Giving them EVIL names like "Darnel" and "Demonte" and GIRLISH names like "Cory" and "Shannon"....damn.

I've met MORE than one sista named "Damita"....wtf....why would their mothers name them that????

[Troy]

3 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

But every day you got some brutha with his picture on the screen.

did you miss the entire me too movement that was largely white boys getting caught up?

 

3 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

They charged Elijah Muhammad and Martin Luther King of sexual infidelity and guess what?

Malcolm X leveled the charge against Elijah, Mohammed, and Martin Luther King was caught on tape?

 

3 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

Damita

was a relatively common name when I was younger, so I’m sure there are a lot of Damita’s still running around.

 

Shannon, is probably a more common name and it is gender neutral like Tracy or Morgan. 
 

Shoot there are a lot of women running around with the name Troy. English is not a gendered language so it’s not like naming a girl Antonio or a boy Sofia.
 

You guys are too young to be having these old attitudes lol!

[ProfD]

4 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

And why in the HELL would you name you son "Shannon"????
What kind of shit is that?

What goes through the MINDS of some of these sistaz when they're naming their kids.

Shannon Sharpe is over 50 years old. Either his momma was ahead of her time or as @Troy mentioned, it's been a gender neutral name for a long time.

 

1 hour ago, Troy said:

You guys are too young to be having these old attitudes lol!

Senior citizens in training.

[Pioneer1]

Troy

 

did you miss the entire me too movement that was largely white boys getting caught up?
 

Ok...
And besides Harvey Weinstein...how many of them actually got locked up and did time like Puffy, Kelly, and Cosby?

And they're trying to get Weinstein out as we speak.
 

That "times up" and "me too" shit was brief, but this is ongoing.

And not only have they went after Black celebrities but Black politicians as well.


 

was a relatively common name when I was younger, so I’m sure there are a lot of Damita’s still running around.
 

I don't know what goes on in the mind of a mother who'd name her child "dam" anything.

 

Troy & ProfD
 

Shannon, is probably a more common name and it is gender neutral like Tracy or Morgan. 
 

Shannon Sharpe is over 50 years old. Either his momma was ahead of her time or as @Troy mentioned, it's been a gender neutral name for a long time.

 

Cory, Tracy, and Sean are more gender neutral...but Shannon isn't.

Shannon is a straight up WOMAN'S name...and a WHITE woman at that, lol.
 

You might as well name you son "Molly" or "Wendy" as far as that goes...lol.

Sometimes I think these mothers REALLY wanted daughters and gave their sons those names out of some sort of longing for a girl.
How else could you explain giving a whole boy a GIRL'S name?

And the daddy probably wasn't around either because I don't know a lot of self respecting men who would even ALLOW their son to be named "Shannon".

"Robin" is almost as bad....lol.
Not QUITE as bad.....but almost.
Robin Williams
Robin Harris.

[Delano]

17 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

Shannon is a straight up WOMAN'S name...and a WHITE woman at that, lol.

If it ends in an "O" it's probably an man's name. Id it ends in an "a" it's probably a women's name.

 

However a name could be either gender, if it's given. A boy named Sue is a case in point.

[Troy]

there’s the author Shannon Holmes, a former poster SHANNON King, the famous boxer, SHANNON Briggs, the baseball player, Shannon, Stewart, and perhaps thousands of other men, you don’t know
 

Just another example of how your personal observations has failed you again

[Pioneer1]

Troy

Just another example of how your personal observations has failed you again

"another"???
"again"???

Lol....what was the FIRST example of my personal observation "failing" me?


In this society "Shannon" is a woman's name.
There are exceptions, but this is pretty clear and understood by most.

It's like men are attracted to women.
There are exceptions as in the case of homosexuals and asexuals, but they are generally not the rule.

 

[ProfD]

7 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

In this society "Shannon" is a woman's name.
There are exceptions, but this is pretty clear and understood by most.

Historically, from its Irish origins, Shannon is a girl's name. But, it has been used as a gender-neutral name for more than 100 years.

[Troy]

On 5/4/2025 at 6:41 AM, Pioneer1 said:

Lol....what was the FIRST example of my personal observation "failing" me?


In this society "Shannon" is a woman's name.

even when presented with ample evidence, you still reject the truth. Dude just say, “I was wrong.”

 

You’ve learned that SHANNON is a gender, neutral name and move on. It’s no big deal. We’re all wrong from time to time.

[aka Contrarian]

@TroyShannon is also a surname as well as gender neutral one. It's an Irish name affiliated with the Shannon River in Ireland

[Pioneer1]

Listen people....don't play games with me.

Lol, don't be "contrary" just for the sake of it.

That name ain't no damn "gender neutral"....it's a GIRLS NAME.

It's been established since I could remember...in America atleast...that "shannon" was pretty much a girl's name and all yall know it!

If you told somebody that "shannon" was waiting on them in the next room, when they walk in that room they're going to be expecting to see a FEMALE.

If a girl told her mother that she was inlove with someone named "shannon" and was going to marry them, her mother would assume her daughter fell inlove with aother woman unless she made it clear he was a dude.

Ohhhhh but now all of a sudden people want to be "linguistic scholars" and dig up the origins of shannon or list how many people in the history of humanity have used it.

Ok, so I guess Linda, Molly, and Marie are "gender neutral" names too.
Why?
Because we can dig up SOME sort of evidence to justify it or find  some FOOL naming their son one of those names and use that as "evidence" that these names that we THOUGHT were female are actually "gender neutral".




 

[ProfD]

55 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

That name ain't no damn "gender neutral"....it's a GIRLS NAME.

We've already mentioned that it started as a girl's name.

55 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

Ohhhhh but now all of a sudden people want to be "linguistic scholars" and dig up the origins of shannon or list how many people in the history of humanity have used it.

The name has been used for dudes over a 100 years and counting. 

55 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

Ok, so I guess Linda, Molly, and Marie are "gender neutral" names too.
Why?
Because we can dig up SOME sort of evidence to justify it or find  some FOOL naming their son one of those names and use that as "evidence" that these names that we THOUGHT were female are actually "gender neutral".

So far, no males have been named Amber, Catherine, Eunice, Felisha, Natalie, Olivia, Daneen, Henrietta, Isabel, Jennifer, Kristen, Linda, Molly, Rachel, Samantha, Theresa, Victoria, Yolanda, Zenobia, Gladys, Monica, Delores, Barbara, Elizabeth, Marie or Polly.

[Pioneer1]

10 minutes ago, ProfD said:

 

The name has been used for dudes over a 100 years and counting. 

 

There are men who use women's restrooms too.
That doesn't mean it's not a WOMEN'S RESTROOM.

There are men who wear dresses and miniskirts, but in THIS society dresses are still considered WOMEN'S CLOTHING.

Yes there are exceptions, but there are also generalities that we SHOULD be able to agree on.
 

[ProfD]

3 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

There are men who use women's restrooms too.
That doesn't mean it's not a WOMEN'S RESTROOM.

What makes it a women's restroom?

3 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

There are men who wear dresses and miniskirts, but in THIS society dresses are still considered WOMEN'S CLOTHING.

Scottish dudes didn't get that memo.

3 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

Yes there are exceptions, but there are also generalities that we SHOULD be able to agree on.

We can agree Shannon was originally intended as a girl's name. It became gender neutral. Just like Lindsey, Michael, Patrice and Quincy to name a few.

[Pioneer1]

7 minutes ago, ProfD said:

What makes it a women's restroom?

Scottish dudes didn't get that memo.

We can agree Shannon was originally intended as a girl's name. It became gender neutral. Just like Lindsey, Michael, Patrice and Quincy to name a few.

Yes but Shannon Sharpe ain't Scottish or Irish and neither was his parents, so why in the hell would his mother give him a name MOSTLY given to girls in this society?

Michelle (or atleast how it's pronounced) is a male's name IN FRENCH but in ENGLISH it's a female's name.
So any mother who would name her son "Michelle" in the United States is setting the boy up for ridicule later on...lol.
She should know better.

Quincy????
When did THAT become gender neutral....lol????
I have yet to meet a female "Quincy".

[aka Contrarian]

In all my years, I NEVER heard Shannon used as a girl's name until I was middleaged. As a child, my neighbors' last name was Shannon that's how I knew its Irish origin.

Around the '70s was when people started giving their daughters surnames like Morgan and Meredith, Tracy and Allyson and Sidney and Whitney, and Reagan which were also gender neutral. 

Nowadays MacKenzie has become a popular girl's name. This trend was popular mainly among white people. Blacks just started making up names and "La"  became a popular prefix.

Traditionally, many women use their maiden name as a middle name for their children. Especially rich white ones.

I was named after an aunt who was named after a prominent white debutant who was a memberof the millionaire Vanderbilt family. She and my aunt  were born on the same day.

 

I was watching the NFL draft to see how my BEARS would make out and all dem first round black picks were named Jaden or Jalin or Kaden or Calin  or Caleb or Justin or Jason or variations thereof.  

 

[Troy]

8 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

That name ain't no damn "gender neutral"....it's a GIRLS NAME.

It's been established since I could remember...in America atleast...that "shannon" was pretty much a girl's name and all yall know it!

 

There you go again using your "personal experience" as your only evidence again.  Despite all the evidence to the contrary, you will still hold onto a demonstrably false idea... incorrigible.

[Pioneer1]

Troy

 

 

There you go again using your "personal experience" as your only evidence again.

 

Personal experience wasn't my "only" evidence.

Even when it comes to the entertainment industry, the only celebrities I knew named "shannon" were female.

Shannon Doherty
Shannon Tweed
Etc....

 

 

 Despite all the evidence to the contrary, you will still hold onto a demonstrably false idea... incorrigible.

Perhaps it's because I'm wondering why so much evidence was presented just to TRY to prove me wrong in this case instead of simply agreeing with me that  in this society "shannon" is pretty much a girl's name.

I may be wrong, but I think there should have been more AGREEMENT with my assertion than pushback...especially from other people born and raised in the same society I was.
 

ProfD came closer than anybody in acknowledging that Shannon is a name used mostly for females in this society, however generally everyone....except me...doesn't seem to see anything wrong with naming a Black boy "shannon". 
And I admit, it IS a bit frustrating.
 

[Troy]

3 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

I may be wrong, but I think there should have been more AGREEMENT with my assertion than pushback...

I push back because you’re so strident in an absolute in your incorrect position,; this is your MO. There is no subtlely in your positions. Everything is black and white. 
 

In this case, every reasonable person knows there are plenty of women and men with the name Shannon., thereby making it a gender-neutral name. But for some unexplained, incomprehensible reason you reject this idea, and provide no coherent explanation.

 

3 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

And I admit, it IS a bit frustrating

I imagine holding onto positions like this would be frustrating when they are vetted with other other people.

[Pioneer1]

15 minutes ago, Troy said:

In this case, every reasonable person knows there are plenty of women and men with the name Shannon., thereby making it a gender-neutral name. But for some unexplained, incomprehensible reason you reject this idea, and provide no coherent explanation.

 

Because what you said isn't entirely true.

Yes, when researched you will find "plenty" (a subjective term) of men and women with the name Shannon.
I agree.
However that alone doesn't make it a gender neutral name.
Only if a roughly or fairly EQUAL amount of males and females with that name would make it gender neutral in my opinion.
If the vast majority of those with that name were female....as is the case in MY observations (yes...here we go...lol) then in MY opinion it's not a gender neutral name but clearly a female one that SOME men are named.

When I looked it up on AI it said:
 

Quote

AI Overview
 

The name Shannon is traditionally considered a girl's name, particularly in the US and other English-speaking countries. However, it's also a unisex name with a strong presence as a name for boys as well, especially in certain regions like Ireland and Australia

 

 

Again, commonly understood in THIS society that it's a girl's name.
But I guess most of you on here doesn't come from THIS society but some other society where just as many boys are named Shannon.

.....I'm telling you the truth.

[ProfD]

2 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

Again, commonly understood in THIS society that it's a girl's name.

The text you pulled up reads traditionally considered...not commonly understood.

 

 

[aka Contrarian]

 

2 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

But I guess most of you on here doesn't come from THIS society but some other society where just as many boys are named Shannon.

.....I'm telling you the truth.

It should be  "most of you on here DON'T come from this society not DOESN'T come from this society.  Sheeze. Dummy. 

[Troy]

2 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

Only if a roughly or fairly EQUAL amount of males and females with that name would make it gender neutral in my opinion.
If the vast majority of those with that name were female....as is the case in MY observations (yes...here we go...lol) then in MY opinion it's not a gender neutral name but clearly a female one that SOME men are named.

 

Actually, if you look deeper a century ago, perhaps, the names were roughly equal between men and women.  In the 70's the name was given to women a lot more frequently, though not exclusively (this is probably why you see it as a girls name as the 70s is when you came of age).  Today in the name is given to both boys and girls equally.  The name by YOUR definition is unisex, gender neutral.  Again. limiting the evidence to you own observations.

 

@Pioneer1 If you encountered the name "Shannon" on a resumè, could you guarantee that the person was female? 

[Pioneer1]

ProfD
 

The text you pulled up reads traditionally considered...not commonly understood
 

Either way, the point is MOST people in this society consider "Shannon" a girl's name.
So I have to question why most people in this thread...for some reason...don't?

Cynique

 

 

"It should be  "most of you on here DON'T come from this society not DOESN'T come from this society.  Sheeze. Dummy. "
 

 

It SHOULD be....about time for you to take your medicine and take your bewildered ass back to bed, shouldn't it?

 

 

Troy

Actually, if you look deeper a century ago, perhaps, the names were roughly equal between men and women.
 

Perhaps???
Lol....are you sure about this?
 

Regardless at to the situation 100 years ago, TODAY it's mostly a female's name and it's been that way for decades now.
 

Today in the name is given to both boys and girls equally.

Are you sure about this also?

If you encountered the name "Shannon" on a resumè, could you guarantee that the person was female? 
 

About as much as I'd "guarantee" that a person named "Leroy Jackson" would be a Black man, lol.

[Troy]

33 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

Either way, the point is MOST people in this society consider "Shannon" a girl's name.

 Most people here don’t consider the name exclusively female on. What basis can you say that most people in society do?! Particularly when half the people who give the name to their kids, give it to their boys. In the face of conflicting information, you continued to double down on your personal observations..

 

35 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

Are you sure about this also?

you can look it up.

 

36 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

About as much as I'd "guarantee" that a person named "Leroy Jackson" would be a Black man, lol.

right, assuming all Leroy Jackson’s are Black will be just as foolish as assuming all Shannon’s are girls. 
 

but again names and who uses them is not fixed but fluid. do you think all brown skinned people were named Johnson Jackson, or Jones prior to the transatlantic slave trade? I don’t know what your name is, but I guarantee it’s not a name anybody would’ve associated with a black person before people were snatched from Africa.

 

 

[Pioneer1]

Troy 

 

Why are you introducing the words "exclusively" and "all" into the discussion???

Who said "all" people named this were of this gender or people with that name were "exclusively" of that gender??????

You're introducing extremes and trying to make them MY argument.

[Troy]

14 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

You're introducing extremes and trying to make them MY argument.

 
lol! Man, I bust out laughing reading that one!

 

The answer to that one is you or the one making these extremeclaims otherwise we won’t be having this conversation.

 

You said flatly that Shannon was a girl’s name. You ridiculed people who would name their boys Shannon. 
 

you wrote that the name was not a gender neutral name. You were firm on this. As you are with most of your positions. There was no gray area. 
 

I explained how the name usage changed overtime I gave you a variety of other examples. Still, you stood firm on your conviction that Shannon was a girl’s name.

 

Sometimes I think if you change your position, you feel that’s a weakness. The reality is it’s a strength the only way you can progress.

[Pioneer1]

Troy

 

 

The answer to that one is you or the one making these extremeclaims otherwise we won’t be having this conversation.

 

What have I said that was "extreme"?

I said that in this society "Shannon" has traditionally been considered a female's name and provided evidence from AI to support my claim.
I shouldn't have had to because most people....except in this thread...acknowledge this already.
 

You said flatly that Shannon was a girl’s name. You ridiculed people who would name their boys Shannon. 
 
I still do.
But the fact that I acknowledged that some people shamefully DO name their boys "shannon" makes it quite obvious that I didn't see it as "exclusively" a girl's name or that "all" people named shannon were female.
...an extreme position that you tried to attribute to me.

[Troy]

18 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

You said flatly that Shannon was a girl’s name. You ridiculed people who would name their boys Shannon. 
 
I still do.

 

 

This has become circular.  You reject the fact that Shannon is a gender-neutral name, while everyone else here accepts this.  You can look up how often the name is given to boys and girls today.  Debating facts is a waste of time. 

 

[ProfD]

Shannon Sharpe chose to settle the lawsuit with his snow bunny for an undisclosed amount of money.

 

Settlement amount has to be far less than the $50 million. Lawyers throw out a high number hoping to negotiate. 

 

Of course, Shannon Sharpe will not be back on ESPN. He's still got his podcast. He was already rich.

 

Sharpe will land on his feet just fine. I hope he makes better choices in where to put his meat.

[Pioneer1]

On 7/31/2025 at 8:55 AM, ProfD said:

 

Sharpe will land on his feet just fine. I hope he makes better choices in where to put his meat.

The brutha'z got so  much BREAD.....I'm sure he has no problem finding a variety of BUNS to slide his meat in between.....lol.

 

 

 

 

 

 

[ProfD]

3 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

The brutha'z got so  much BREAD.....I'm sure he has no problem finding a variety of BUNS to slide his meat in between.....lol.

Bread isn't the issue. He likes shopping in the women equivalent of H&M or Aeropostale. 

 

A young adult stuck his old azz for that paper. She was only attracted to his bread.

 

Sharpe needs to get on point and 1) hire escorts according to his tastes or 2) find an older woman who is physically fir and discreet.

[Pioneer1]

5 hours ago, ProfD said:

Bread isn't the issue. He likes shopping in the women equivalent of H&M or Aeropostale. 

 

A young adult stuck his old azz for that paper. She was only attracted to his bread.

 

Sharpe needs to get on point and 1) hire escorts according to his tastes or 2) find an older woman who is physically fir and discreet.

You're talking about going against the grain of thousands of years of social evolution.

Most men know they are "paying" for it one way or another, but suggesting they go the DIRECT route is still offensive to most.
They like to feel that it's something about THEM that got them the sex, not their money.

Same reason many if not most men don't care too much for women who come on to them as much as ones THEY went out and caught.

If it comes right up to them and hops in their laps they don't get to brag about their seduction skills....lol.

[ProfD]

57 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

You're talking about going against the grain of thousands of years of social evolution.

Sure. Men are wired with varying degrees of s8x drive.

 

Evolution should also include having enough sense to know the game and not becoming a trick.

 

There's a reason you don't see too many rich non-Black dudes getting sued for child support and/or assault.

 

They understand that a man doesn't make money chasing women. But, a man on his purpose and chasing money attracts more women.

 

 

57 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

Most men know they are "paying" for it one way or another, but suggesting they go the DIRECT route is still offensive to most.

Shannon Sharpe ticks every box for a trick.

 

Black athletes and entertainers are easy marks.

 

Rich men go the direct route. They use high priced prostitutes. 

 

57 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

They like to feel that it's something about THEM that got them the sex, not their money.

Jeff Bezos knows his wife is only with him because he's wealthy. 

 

POTUS OJ knows hia mail-order bride cannot stand his azz. The bread makes her stay.

 

Sames goes for any lame azz dude who isn't naturally attractive to women.

 

The main reason many men chase money is to become more attractive above their station. 

 

Having to settle for millions of dollars for some snow bunny snatch box is just dumb.

[Pioneer1]

ProfD

 

 

Sure. Men are wired with varying degrees of s8x drive.

Evolution should also include having enough sense to know the game and not becoming a trick.

 

Law suits and living in a racist society isn't exactly a "natural" part of social/biological evolution...lol.

Men are biologically wired to take calculated risks and seek sex from women they find attracted; however they are NOT biologically wired to consider lawsuits and video tapes in their calculations.

These are products of an artificially constructed society.
Often times constructed against them.

 

 

 

There's a reason you don't see too many rich non-Black dudes getting sued for child support and/or assault.

 

Right.
Because often times there's a SYSTEM designed to protect them and THEY control that system.

 

1. Abortions are usually available upon demand for the "side chicks" who end up pregnant from such relationships; to prevent the births of unwanted children that would bring shame and disgrace to those men.

 

2. The system is controlled BY those non-Black men to protect eachother FROM being caught up in frivolous law suits and criminal charges when the situation arises.

 

 

 

 

 

Rich men go the direct route. They use high priced prostitutes. 

 

It depends on HOW they got rich.
Those who come from money do; but those who come from poverty or the working class usually don't because they come from cultures where there is a "pride" in being able to seduce women yourself instead of paying directly.

 

Like I said earlier, most men "pay" one way or the other; however if you are in the hood and suggest to a group of young bruthaz that they directly PAY for sex you'd get laughed off the block.
With all the money they spend on cars, clothes, and jewelry to attract women....they'd still consider it a disgrace or shame to have to pay directly for sex.

 

 

 

 

 

Having to settle for millions of dollars for some snow bunny snatch box is just dumb.

 

It's unfortunate.
However if it's done to keep you out of jail or keep that person from escalating the matter by filing CRIMINAL charges against you...then understand that's the type of system you're living in.
 

He's doing what he can to NOT end up like Puffy Daddy.

You don't hear about situations like this much in African and Caribbean nations although Black men with money and power engage in the same behavior.
Why?
Because in those nations BLACK MEN control the societies and government so it's harder to be used against them.

[ProfD]

17 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

Men are biologically wired to take calculated risks and seek sex from women they find attracted; however they are NOT biologically wired to consider lawsuits and video tapes in their calculations.

These are products of an artificially constructed society.
Often times constructed against them.

There is no excuse especially for men who grow up in such a system.  They know the *rules* of the game including laws, fines and penalties.  Claiming low intelligence is not solid form of defense.

 

17 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

It depends on HOW they got rich.
Those who come from money do; but those who come from poverty or the working class usually don't because they come from cultures where there is a "pride" in being able to seduce women yourself instead of paying directly. 

Men have a false sense of belief that they are seducing women with or without money. 

 

Women *choose* who they want to get down with whether she gives it up for free up to stretching that wallet like a rubberband.

 

17 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

Like I said earlier, most men "pay" one way or the other; however if you are in the hood and suggest to a group of young bruthaz that they directly PAY for sex you'd get laughed off the block.

Hood n8gglets barely have enough money to survive.  Of course, they'd much rather spend it on weed, cigarettes and drinks. 

 

The funny part is that as long as they have something to drink and smoke, they can find a female to poke.

 

Young men usually do not have to pay for his 1st s8xual experiences.  Quite naturally, they don't even have a concept of paying for s8x.

 

As long as a man deals with women who are naturally attracted to him, he doesn't have to *pay* for s8x either.

 

Men have to *pay* for s8x with women who are not naturally attracted to them.   

 

Again, that's why men try to earn enough money and spend it on things to make themselves more attractive especially to women who are out of their league.

 

Case in point...the same snow bunny who fleeced Shannon Sharpe out of millions of dollars is f8cking the dude she really likes for FREE.  In fact, she will spend some of that Sharpe cheese on her true boo thang.

 

17 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

With all the money they spend on cars, clothes, and jewelry to attract women....they'd still consider it a disgrace or shame to have to pay directly for sex.

Simpin' has been around for so long that those kind of dudes don't even know which way is up. 

 

Women are laughing at those lame azz dudes...sometimes all the way to to the bank.

 

17 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

Having to settle for millions of dollars for some snow bunny snatch box is just dumb.

 

It's unfortunate.
However if it's done to keep you out of jail or keep that person from escalating the matter by filing CRIMINAL charges against you...then understand that's the type of system you're living in.

 

He's doing what he can to NOT end up like Puffy Daddy.

Shannon Sharpe is d8mn near 60 years old.  That who situation makes him either an ignorant or a dumb azz man.

 

17 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

You don't hear about situations like this much in African and Caribbean nations although Black men with money and power engage in the same behavior.
Why?
Because in those nations BLACK MEN control the societies and government so it's harder to be used against them.

The *culture* provides those men with a pass more than anything.  Most of the women are already conditioned to deal with broke azz men.  To the point that they don't have a problem sharing a *rich* man who can take care of her and her family.  

 

The bottom line is that men only have to pay directly or indirectly for women who aren't truly attracted to them.

[Chevdove]

On 4/29/2025 at 8:53 PM, ProfD said:

Black men especially those who have money really need to 1) stop believing they have the same privileges as white men, 2)  do a better job of protecting themselves from predators and 3) more importantly....learn how to fight back.

 

Oh well.

He is 57 years old and that girl is only  22!

Whose the predator? 

What in the H3ll is wrong with him.

Learn how to fight back!? 

It's not about her being White, shoot even if she were Black, I think he would be making a mistake. 

Monique warned him! 

That young girl got his money. 

 

[ProfD]

3 hours ago, Chevdove said:

Oh well.

He is 57 years old and that girl is only  22!

Whose the predator? 

She's considered an adult.

 

Many old azz dudes have preferred younger women since the beginning of time.

 

3 hours ago, Chevdove said:

What in the H3ll is wrong with him.

Learn how to fight back!? 

Legally. Money can buy protection if one is smart enough to use it accordingly.

3 hours ago, Chevdove said:

It's not about her being White, shoot even if she were Black, I think he would be making a mistake. 

Monique warned him! 

That young girl got his money. 

Right. He's not the 1st and won't be the last fool and his money to be parted. Oldest trick in the book.

[Pioneer1]

Lol....
Is 57 really considered "old" now a days????

Compared to a 22 year old maybe, but....generally speaking???
 

I don't think the brutha is a fool for using is money and fame to get sex and female attention.
I have a problem with him spending it on a WHITE woman.
However other than that, it's what I would consider a business transation.

 

She wants his money.
He wants her.
They get together and establish an understanding where both parties are satisfied.

This shouldn't be illegal.
This is the United States, not Iran or any other Theocracy where sexual activities are outlawed or severely restricted.

I say let consenting adults do what they wish among eachother.


Speaking of sex and age.
I'm not far from 57 myself and I frequently get pushed up on by African women in their 30s and 40s at work and on the streets.
Things are definitely changing from 10 years ago where it seemed like they didn't talk to Black American men.
They rove around in PACKS now giggling and giving me and many other Black American men the "eye"...lol.
Especially those of us over 40.

It seems like regardless as to how they look, a lot of (perhaps even most) men under 30 don't seem to attract women much now a days.
 

[ProfD]

2 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

Lol....
Is 57 really considered "old" now a days????

Compared to a 22 year old maybe, but....generally speaking???

A 35 year age difference between a man and woman makes that n8gglet old...enough to be her granddaddy.

 

if a 57-year-old woman was bunned up with a 22-year old dude folks would be giving her the side-eye real heavy.

 

2 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

I don't think the brutha is a fool for using is money and fame to get sex and female attention.

The main reason many men try to make a lot of money is to have s8xual access to women to whom they're attracted.

 

What makes a man with money a fool is tricking without a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA). He's better off paying an escort service.

 

2 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

She wants his money.
He wants her.
They get together and establish an understanding where both parties are satisfied.

This shouldn't be illegal.

There's a reason people lock their doors. Avoid strange places at night. They don't want to get robbed.

 

A man should treat his money the same way. He's instinctively guarded if a strange looking dude in a hoodie is walking towards him.

 

a man with money should  be equally guarded when it comes to women. She's gonna rob his azz without a gun. Just gonna use that snatch box. Got him. Ch-ching.

 

2 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

This is the United States, not Iran or any other Theocracy where sexual activities are outlawed or severely restricted.

I say let consenting adults do what they wish among eachother.

Consenting adults are doing their thing everyday and everywhere. There's no shortage of child support cases and s8xual assault lawsuits either. 

 

2 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

Speaking of sex and age.
I'm not far from 57 myself and I frequently get pushed up on by African women in their 30s and 40s at work and on the streets.

Those  African women might think you're in a position to help them get a green card.

 

[Pioneer1]

ProfD
 

 

 

A 35 year age difference between a man and woman makes that n8gglet old...enough to be her granddaddy

Yeah....but he's not.

If she had a 22 year old lover.....she could say that he's too close to his age and old enough to be her brother, not her lover.

The comparisons don't stop.
At the end of the day, it is what it is.
2 consenting adults.


 

if a 57-year-old woman was bunned up with a 22-year old dude folks would be giving her the side-eye real heavy.

 

Which would be quite natural because it's highly unusual for women of that age to prefer such a young man.
It happens, but it's rare.
That's THEIR choice....not society.

Nobody is actually stopping women of that age FROM going after 22 year old men if they want them; most of them CHOOSE not to.
 

This is what I mean about consenting adults having the freedom to choose what THEY want to do.

We can make all kinds of judgments and have opinions about how people are paired up but at the end of the day, in America most of it is VOLUNTARY.  The vast majority of people who are together are choosing to be together for their own personal reasons.
I'd rather it to be this way than to have a society where relationships are "arranged".

 

 

What makes a man with money a fool is tricking without a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA). He's better off paying an escort service.
 

That wouldn't be bad at all.
It would certainly be easier.
However as I mentioned before, prostitution take some of the "fun" out of pulling a female by your own wit and charm...lol.

Even if a man is using his money and cars and status to attract women, the idea of actually pulling out some money and PAYING for coochie is very off putting for most men because of what it implies.

 

 

Those  African women might think you're in a position to help them get a green card.

 

Lol....
They may not be wrong, if the "right" one comes along.

Better be glad we don't live in a society where you can have more than one wife....I'd start a "marry for a green card" business...lol.

 

I believe the Universe heard all of the complaining I was doing about African women with White men and now the tide has changed.
Within the past year I'd say about half the African women I know....even the married ones...have or are flirting with a Black American lover (myself included in that).

[ProfD]

2 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

The comparisons don't stop.

At the end of the day, it is what it is.
2 consenting adults.

Sure. The comparisons could go on but you've lived in this society long enough to know the dealy-o.

 

Consenting adults should do their thing. Just be prepared to deal with any consequences. That includes a man who gets caught tricking.

 

2 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

Which would be quite natural because it's highly unusual for women of that age to prefer such a young man.

It happens, but it's rare.
That's THEIR choice....not society.

In this society, it is taboo for a woman who they will negatively label as cougar to get her groove with a dude decades younger.

 

If older women didn't feel stigmatized by double-standard society, they would be ignoring old azz dudes who may not be functioning properly and getting their oil changed by younger men. Some already do.

 

2 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

Nobody is actually stopping women of that age FROM going after 22 year old men if they want them; most of them CHOOSE not to.

It is a combination of stigma and choice. Most older women subconciously see younger men as a *son* more than s8x objects. They don't want that Oedipus complex smoke.

 

2 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

We can make all kinds of judgments and have opinions about how people are paired up but at the end of the day, in America most of it is VOLUNTARY.  The vast majority of people who are together are choosing to be together for their own personal reasons.
I'd rather it to be this way than to have a society where relationships are "arranged".

Right. End of the day, folks are free to do their thing within reason. 

2 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

However as I mentioned before, prostitution take some of the "fun" out of pulling a female by your own wit and charm...lol.

Shannon Sharpe didn't pull that 22-year-old with his wit, charm or muscles. She knew that thick-tongued n8gglet had coins probably because he told her with his  dumbazz.

 

2 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

Even if a man is using his money and cars and status to attract women, the idea of actually pulling out some money and PAYING for coochie is very off putting for most men because of what it implies.

There's really no difference. Everyone can see when a man is using material things to pay/pull a woman.

 

The real pimp can show up broke, busted and disgusted and have women falling over him due to natural swagger.

 

2 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

They may not be wrong, if the "right" one comes along.

Better be glad we don't live in a society where you can have more than one wife....I'd start a "marry for a green card" business...lol.

It's already a business.

2 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

I believe the Universe heard all of the complaining I was doing about African women with White men and now the tide has changed.
Within the past year I'd say about half the African women I know....even the married ones...have or are flirting with a Black American lover (myself included in that).

That's been ongoing for a while too. Reads like it's finally made it to Michigan.

[Pioneer1]

ProfD

In this society, it is taboo for a woman who they will negatively label as cougar to get her groove with a dude decades younger.
 

Yes, however right now in this society a MAN (Shannon Sharpe) is being clowned on for it!
Same difference.
 

Some people just have a hang-up about any type of sexual situation period.
Where it's a man with another man.
A man with a younger woman.
A man with an older woman.
An older woman with a younger man.

If you aren't married, having sex missionary style, and ONLY for procreation...somebody is going to have something to say, lol.

If older women didn't feel stigmatized by double-standard society, they would be ignoring old azz dudes who may not be functioning properly and getting their oil changed by younger men. Some already do.
 

I hear what you're saying, but atleast it's not illegal.
Women can do what they want to do in that regard.
Nobody is stopping them.

I've noticed that some women will criticize men for doing things they DON'T WANT to do even though they're allowed to do it themselves.
It's not a matter or right or wrong.
Men do it because men WANT to do it, while most women DON'T want to do it.
However instead of understanding this difference and respecting it, some will try to shame and clown on the men for doing something they can really engage in themselves if they so wished.

 

Most older women subconciously see younger men as a *son* more than s8x objects. They don't want that Oedipus complex smoke.
 

Exactly.
Reminds me of that scene from Baby Boy when Melvin finally goes off on Jody, lol.

But that's real.
Most women are biologically programmed to seek older men.
Not just for financial reasons but for maturity and life-skills confidence.
There are exceptions, and this society allows for that.

The real pimp can show up broke, busted and disgusted and have women falling over him due to natural swagger.
 

Is that a PIMP or a GIGILO?




 

That's been ongoing for a while too. Reads like it's finally made it to Michigan
 

....and landed at my doorstep, like the Wall Street Journal...lol.