US AG Threatens to Prosecute Hate Speech

[ProfD]

US Attorney General Pam Bondi says hate speech will be prosecuted. Nevermind having to hurdle the 1st amendment. 

 

This comes in the wake of any comments being made about the unalived white nationalist that are unfavorable to the current administration and the MAGA movement.

 

Of course, AG Bondi had to walk back her statement when as s trained lawyer, she realized the US Constitution supersedes her authority. 

 

Americans may have to decide how much fascism they want in their lives.

[Troy]

When some people speak, I don’t pay attention to them.

[Pioneer1]

ProfD

Ofcourse

And you know "hate speech" will be considered anything this Administration doesn't like.
You can see the direction they're going by how they're targeting people who make certain comments about Charlie Kirk's assassination.
And ofcourse you have many media outlets like ABC News and some other institutions who are lock-n-step with them, firing people and cancelling their programs for saying the wrong thing.

But like you said in another thread....Jimmy Kimmel is rich so simply canceling his show isn't a strong enough punishment because he'll still be able to live a life of relative ease with the wealth and connections he still has.  
But once they start making laws to get people in LEGAL trouble for saying things they don't like and threaten to take away their freedom over it, money becomes less of a protection.

[ProfD]

1 hour ago, Pioneer1 said:

And you know "hate speech" will be considered anything this Administration doesn't like.

Right. I'm curious to see how far back they're allowed to infringe on the 1st amendment of the US Constitution. 

 

1 hour ago, Pioneer1 said:

And ofcourse you have many media outlets like ABC News and some other institutions who are lock-n-step with them, firing people and cancelling their programs for saying the wrong thing.

Again, it's interesting how supposedly liberal media fell right in line with the BS. This is white people sh8t.

 

1 hour ago, Pioneer1 said:

But once they start making laws to get people in LEGAL trouble for saying things they don't like and threaten to take away their freedom over it, money becomes less of a protection.

Unless the hottest new job in the US becomes being a *snitch* monitoring the internet, they won't be able to prosecute most average people regardless of what they say and/or type.

 

However, anyone with a platform, private or public job...they might have to watch their mouf.

[Pioneer1]

19 minutes ago, ProfD said:

 

Unless the hottest new job in the US becomes being a *snitch* monitoring the internet, they won't be able to prosecute most average people regardless of what they say and/or type.

You started this very thread because Bondi wants to charge people criminally simply for what they SAY.
Which is not new.
They've been going after people since 9/11 and even before to a certain extent and locking them up for things they say.
Especially if they make threats against public officials.

In that atmosphere......
An off-color remark about hoping some wing-nut gets "what they deserve" would be just the excuse they need to accuse a political enemy of making a "threat" and charging them criminally.
 

[ProfD]

52 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

You started this very thread because Bondi wants to charge people criminally simply for what they SAY.

She quickly had to walk it back.

52 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

They've been going after people since 9/11 and even before to a certain extent and locking them up for things they say.

Especially if they make threats against public officials.

True. That was under the guise of terrorism. 

52 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

In that atmosphere......
An off-color remark about hoping some wing-nut gets "what they deserve" would be just the excuse they need to accuse a political enemy of making a "threat" and charging them criminally.

Sure. But just as they cannot round up every illegal immigrant and mass shooter, there isn't enough manpower to prosecute especially if a  bunch of folks decide to test their 1st amendment rights.

[Pioneer1]

 

ProfD
 

On 9/18/2025 at 10:07 PM, ProfD said:

But just as they cannot round up every illegal immigrant and mass shooter,

I actually think they CAN do that....atleast every civilian who is stockpiling weapons and espousing violent rhetoric.
They know who these people are.
They simply don't want to.
 

[ProfD]

1 hour ago, Pioneer1 said:

I actually think they CAN do that....atleast every civilian who is stockpiling weapons and espousing violent rhetoric.
They know who these people are.
They simply don't want to.

Right. It's mainly because of the 2nd amendment they love so much.

[Pioneer1]

11 minutes ago, ProfD said:

Right. It's mainly because of the 2nd amendment they love so much.

The problem with the 2nd Amendment argument is that it guarantees people the right to KEEP AND BEAR arms and that right shall not be infringed....however it clearly HAS been infringed on many if not most people.

Felons aren't allowed to keep or bear arms in most states.
You also need a permit to openly carry arms in most states.

So clearly that Amendment isn't honored.
They pick and choose who they allow to exercise it.
 

[ProfD]

1 hour ago, Pioneer1 said:

The problem with the 2nd Amendment argument is that it guarantees people the right to KEEP AND BEAR arms and that right shall not be infringed....however it clearly HAS been infringed on many if not most people.

Americans have more guns than all other countries combined. 

1 hour ago, Pioneer1 said:

Felons aren't allowed to keep or bear arms in most states.

Most of them still have weapons.

1 hour ago, Pioneer1 said:

You also need a permit to openly carry arms in most states.

It's fairly easy to get an open carry permit in states that allow it.
 

1 hour ago, Pioneer1 said:

So clearly that Amendment isn't honored.
They pick and choose who they allow to exercise it.

While some states have more strict gun laws than others, no state prevents American citizens from owning a shotgun or a hunting rifle. Still a fiream.

[Pioneer1]

ProfD

 

 

Americans have more guns than all other countries combined. 

 

Facts.

 

Most of them still have weapons.

 

Either that or ACCESS to weapons.
However it should be noted that most of the weapons they get their hands on are of "street value".
Cheaply made and fit for only local civilian beefs.
They aren't military grade.

 

 

 

It's fairly easy to get an open carry permit in states that allow it.

 

Not for convicted felons, in most states atleast.

 

 

 

While some states have more strict gun laws than others, no state prevents American citizens from owning a shotgun or a hunting rifle. Still a fiream

 

Again, if you are a convicted felon...and in some cases convicted of a domestic violence misdemeanor...you aren't allowed to own one.

Which pretty much flies in the face of the Constitution.
 

[ProfD]

58 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

Either that or ACCESS to weapons.

However it should be noted that most of the weapons they get their hands on are of "street value".
Cheaply made and fit for only local civilian beefs.
They aren't military grade.

Most of the guns Americans buy aren't military grade.

 

The guns that make it to the streets are legit. There is a belief that guns are being dumped into urban areas.

 

A firearm doesn't have to be military grade in order to do damage.

 

Just a matter of hitting a target in the right spot for a killshot.

 

58 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

Not for convicted felons, in most states atleast.

 

Again, if you are a convicted felon...and in some cases convicted of a domestic violence misdemeanor...you aren't allowed to own one.

We've already covered how convicted felons are still walking around with firearms. They're not too worried about the law.

 

58 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

Which pretty much flies in the face of the Constitution.

Laws are written that prevent felons from legally obtaining firearms

 

If enough former white felons formed a coalition to restore their gun rights...it would happen overnight. 

 

The USA doesn't want non-white felons being abe to obtain firearms legally. Again, there's a way around everything.

[Pioneer1]

ProfD

 

 

Just a matter of hitting a target in the right spot for a killshot.

 

And THAT'S the problem with a lot of the weapons being dumped on the street.
They are highly inaccurate.

 

This has been known on the streets for a long time.

Like a lot of rappers from back in the day used to brag about getting their guns from China to make sure they "get that ass"....lol.
They knew if it was made in China or Korea...it would be more accurate and work when you need it to.

I believe this is also something Baba Dick Gregory used to go into.
About how they'd purposely dump inferior weapons on the streets that would jam, have chips in them, and backfire on their handlers.

[ProfD]

4 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

And THAT'S the problem with a lot of the weapons being dumped on the street.

They are highly inaccurate.

The dead and wounded folks in urban areas would like to have a word about the effectiveness of the weapons used against them.

[Pioneer1]

3 hours ago, ProfD said:

The dead and wounded folks in urban areas would like to have a word about the effectiveness of the weapons used against them.

The fact that so many "innocent" people are killed and wounded as well as so many people who were intended to be killed were merely wounded is evidence of not just the inaccuracy of the suspects but the inaccuracy of their weapons.
Shows like the Wire and social media itself produce plenty of video of gat jamming on people in the middle of the action.

Granted a lot of this comes from not properly taking care of their weapons and not knowing how to properly use them, but a lot of it comes from shoddy manufacturing to begin with.

[ProfD]

4 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

Granted a lot of this comes from not properly taking care of their weapons and not knowing how to properly use them, but a lot of it comes from shoddy manufacturing to begin with.

Because I know most n8gglets don't spend enough time at the gun range, I can surmise they're not most proficient in gun handling and safety. They treat guns like old cameras...point and shoot.