Him?????

[Pioneer1]

You're telling me THIS:

...is the man Serena Williams CHOSE to lay up and open her legs to and have babies with????


Psychological Warfare is REAL, people.

[ProfD]

Yep. That's her dude.

 

If it is any consolation to the brothas, Serena's husband was already rich before she married him. Made his bread in the tech industry.

 

Serena is not being fleeced out of her fortune.

 

My question is when is he going to hit the gym with her.

 

 

[Pioneer1]

18 minutes ago, ProfD said:

 

If it is any consolation to the brothas, Serena's husband was already rich before she married him. Made his bread in the tech industry.

 

Consolation???
That's even WORSE.....lol.
Because that means she DIDN'T marry him for the money but for who he really IS.

Let me make it clear....
I personally don't find Serena attractive.
I was more of a Venus supporter.
Not only was she less cocky and confident....which I personally find attractive on a woman.
But she was far less muscular and masculine than Serena.

 

....and STILL playing!
....and STILL looks great!

She was out there playing last week and I thought it was an OLD video of her from the 90s.
Somebody said NO that's her now playing!
Haven't aged a BIT out there on that court!


However the fact that Serena had all the money she needed and could have picked any man means the man she DID pick is one who really loved.
So now you scratch you head and wonder what is it about THAT man that a sista raised in Compton (but born in Michigan) loves so much or sees something special in???
 

[ProfD]

4 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

However the fact that Serena had all the money she needed and could have picked any man means the man she DID pick is one who really loved.
So now you scratch you head and wonder what is it about THAT man that a sista raised in Compton (but born in Michigan) loves so much or sees something special in???

Of course that's a question only Serena can answer. Considering her dating history, this dude must have been *safe* on several levels.

[Delano]

Only a fool looks for logic in chambers in the human heart 

[Pioneer1]

Only a fool assumes that all marriages are based on love and the human heart.

[aka Contrarian]

Apparently, after a series of failed relationships, Serena Willians has finally found happiness.

What does it say about a person who begrudges her this, and tries to steal her joy?

 

Venus Williams just recently got engaged to the  successful millionaire she is pictured with below. 

 

 

 

 

[umbrarchist]

It does look like she can kick his ass if he gives her a hard time.

[Pioneer1]

Cynique

 

Apparently, after a series of failed relationships, 

 

First of all....
For the sake of discussion I won't entertain the idea that SHE was the real problem in these "failed" former relationships.

 

However when a woman claims that she had a bunch of "failed relationships" in the past, I often wonder what she means by "failed"?

Nobody is perfect and everyone has issues, so there's only so many ways a relationship between a man and woman can actually "fail" to the point that it's no longer worth having.

 

-Were the men in those past relationships no longer able to achieve erections for sex?
-Were the men she was with abusive?
-Did the men she was with give her some sort of disease?
-Was she trying to have children with these men and they were unable to give her some?

 

Serious questions

 

What exactly "failed" in these former relationships?

 

And what did the White boy do that was "right" to where the relationship no longer "failed" but "succeeded"?

 

 

Serena Willians has finally found happiness.

 

Dude looks like a stick of margarine that was left out in the sun.

 

 

If THAT'S her idea of happiness, she could have found it years ago in the dairy section of her local grocery store.

 

 

 

 Shhhh...............

As quiet as it's kept......
The REAL reason some Black women do better when they get into relationships with White men....isn't because White men act better....it's because THEY straighten up and act better.
If they had watched their tone, acted more feminine and submissive, and showed more encouragement to the BLACK MEN in their lives like they often do their current White partner.....the Black partners would not only have treated them the same but in most cases would have treated them BETTER.
 

[ProfD]

On 9/29/2025 at 7:13 PM, Pioneer1 said:

If they had watched their tone, acted more feminine and submissive, and showed more encouragement...

A rich, successful woman doesn't *need* a man to take care of her. As a result, she doesn't have to cater to him on any level (mental, physical, emotional).

 

Successful and/or rich women have a harder time finding a man who 1) doesn't feel threatened by her status and 2) isn't trying to control her.

 

Those women have different needs beyond the physical. They can find healthy men by the dozen. That's easy.

 

Finding a man worth spending their time and life with who adds to their happiness can be a challenge for rich, successful women. 

 

No matter how much money a woman has, there are men who will never see or treat her as an equal or better. That will present problems.

[Pioneer1]

ProfD

No matter how "successful" a woman is......if she's not successful AS a woman....she's not likely to be happy.

Success = Happiness    sho'nuff

But Wealth doesn't always bring happiness because Wealth doesn't always = Success.


Some things are just biological.
Humans are programmed by nature to desire and feel comfort in certain things, and society can't change this.

Just like most women aren't happy unless they have children or have a man as a protector

Having her own money won't change or override this biological desire.
If she isn't finding it in her own community, she will seek it elsewhere.....but she WILL seek it.
 

[ProfD]

7 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

No matter how "successful" a woman is......if she's not successful AS a woman....she's not likely to be happy.

That's a belief men consistently get wrong when it comes to women. They don't need a man in order to be successful or happy.

 

7 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

Success = Happiness    sho'nuff

Not really.

 

Notice that I wrote add to happiness.

 

I always do that because humans don't need money or power in order to be happy.

 

Happiness come from within the individual and emanates outward.

 

The only thing another person can do is add or subtract from it.

 

Another person should never be the source of one's happiness. Something is wrong there. It's out of order like a vending machine. 

 

7 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

But Wealth doesn't always bring happiness because Wealth doesn't always = Success.

Correct. Wealth and/or success do not automatically equate to happiness. 

 

7 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

Some things are just biological.
Humans are programmed by nature to desire and feel comfort in certain things, and society can't change this.

Just like most women aren't happy unless they have children or have a man as a protector

The alphabet soup community might feel differently.

 

7 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

Having her own money won't change or override this biological desire.
If she isn't finding it in her own community, she will seek it elsewhere.....but she WILL seek it.

Her biological desire doesn't necessarily have to be a man.

 

I know quite a few women who are perfectly fine and content without a man. Don't wanna be bothered at all.

[Pioneer1]

ProfD

 

That's a belief men consistently get wrong when it comes to women. They don't need a man in order to be successful or happy.

 

They don't need a man to live their lives.
But in order to be happy, if she's heterosexual....she does.
Unless she's post-menopausal.
Then the men are ON PAUSE...lol.

 

Notice that I wrote add to happiness.
I always do that because humans don't need money or power in order to be happy.
Happiness come from within the individual and emanates outward.

 

And notice how I said Success = Happiness
But Wealth doesn't always = Success.

 

Success is simply getting what you want and desire in life.
Whether that's money, good health, loving relationship, or all of these things.
If you have what you want and desire....you WILL be happy.

If you aren't Successful in your life, you WON'T be happy.

 

 

 

The alphabet soup community might feel differently.

 

They might still agree because I said MOST, lol.

They are still a minority in this society.
MOST women are still heterosexual and cis-gendered.
They want that ROD...lol.

 

 

I know quite a few women who are perfectly fine and content without a man. Don't wanna be bothered at all

 

1. How old are these women?
2. How do we KNOW they are fine and content and not just putting up a front but have to go to therapists every week to for counseling and or have drug and alcohol problems to deal with the loneliness?

Like the old saying goes, 
Believe HALF of what you see and NONE of what you hear.

[ProfD]

30 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

They don't need a man to live their lives.
But in order to be happy, if she's heterosexual....she does.

Women can consume themselves with all types of sh8t and d8mn near forget men exist.

 

30 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

Success is simply getting what you want and desire in life.
Whether that's money, good health, loving relationship, or all of these things.
If you have what you want and desire....you WILL be happy.

If you aren't Successful in your life, you WON'T be happy.

True.

 

30 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

MOST women are still heterosexual and cis-gendered.

They want that ROD...lol.

I'm sure many of them do but there is no shortage of exceptions for one reason or several.

30 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

1. How old are these women?

Age range varies. Most of their issues with men stem from how they were treated. 

30 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

2. How do we KNOW they are fine and content and not just putting up a front but have to go to therapists every week to for counseling and or have drug and alcohol problems to deal with the loneliness?

Of course, we have no way of really knowing what they think and/or how they're coping with their issue(s).

 

30 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

Like the old saying goes, 
Believe HALF of what you see and NONE of what you hear.

I live by those words for the most part. I have to make some room for VGQ though.

[Delano]

Kick or lick

[aka Contrarian]

Now we know what kind of person "begrudges Serena her happiness".

The usual opinionated blather and imagined scenarios, and  obsessive, insecure attacks on white males and condescending assumptions  about women.  

Put a sock in it! 

               

@Serena: kudos to you for getting your life in order.  

You go, Girl!

 

Serena and her handsome 6'5" millionaire husband.  

[Pioneer1]

ProfD

Women can consume themselves with all types of sh8t and d8mn near forget men exist.

 

Old women...yes.
Many old men can also forget about the opposite sex too if their testosterone levels drop too low and they have other issues they're dealing with.

 

 

 

Age range varies. Most of their issues with men stem from how they were treated.

 

How they were treated AND what they were taught to expect from men.
What I mean by that is....

Much of what women in this society believe is "right" and "wrong" for men to do and what they expect from men isn't innate or instinctual.
It's TAUGHT to them since childhood.

They are CONDITIONED by society in general (schools, television, movies, other women, religion, etc...) about what to believe about men what what their roles are, instead of allowing nature to take it's course.

If they did.....sex and strength would be the major factors.
Even more so than money.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cynique

 

Put a sock in it! 

 

It's YOUR "thang-thang"; why don't YOU put a sock in it......
Cuz I ain't TOUCHING it....lol.

 

 

Serena and her handsome 6'5" millionaire husband.  

 

Handsome?

See that's the issue right there.

Too many of yall see any White man who isn't deformed.....as "handsome".

Some of you think any random run-of-the-mill White man is good looking and all he has to do is just BE NICE to you and smile and you're in love.

That man looks like a packet of mayonnaise with hair sprouting on top, but for some of yall...his Caucasian features ALONE makes him a "prize" worth appreciating.

Who cares about his physique or how big his dick is or how good he is in bed.
Just be a typical White man with some money and be nice enough to not call you a nigger (atleast when he's not angry)......and...hey.

 

 

BTW....
When was the last time you heard White women talk about how handsome Denzel Washington or Idris Elba was?
You know they do, but many of them TRAIN themselves to restrain from admitting to it publically.

[aka Contrarian]

@Pioneer1SMH.Pathetic.The only thing more obvious than your frustration is your jealousy and envy. You are totally threatened by white males and are in denial about how overrated black masculinity is. You cling to the black stud myth idea like a security blanket.

Unlike ProfD,  you can't just confidently take the Serena situation and all of its implications in your stride. No, instead you have to go overboard in your resentment and hysterical put-downs  about a situation that should be of no concern to you. Why does how Serena Williams' conducts her personal affairs, drive you up the wall? It's none of your damned business. Getta life!

And you gotta be kiddin about  Denzel who's well past his prime,  ready to be put out to pasture, all tired and worried lookin. And Idris who is getting by on his celebrity cuz there's a hell of a lot more better pickins out there than him!

.     

 

         

 

You need to update. It's 2025. 

 

Secure people don't have to bad mouth the competition. They  give credit where credit is due and keep on truckin.

 

If black women want to do what black men have been doing for years when it comes to white mates, then black men have only themselves to blame.

 

[Pioneer1]

 

7 hours ago, aka Contrarian said:

 

If black women want to do what black men have been doing for years when it comes to white mates, then black men have only themselves to blame.

 

Maybe I'm mistaken but.....

I thought White men were raping Black women and forcing them into other compromising positions for YEARS....CENTURIES....before Black men and White women started VOLUNTARILY having sex with eachother.

How can the two even be compared?

200 years ago the ONLY time he could get a Black woman is by force because they simply didn't find him attractive enough.
But today.....oh today...some of them are running around calling him an "angel" and talking about how "cute" he is....lol.

Like I said, psychological warfare is real.

[aka Contrarian]

4 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

Maybe I'm mistaken but.....
 

Yes, you are mistaken, - as you so often are; mistaken and  devious. So, take your cherry-picked, strawman argument and stuff it along with your pre-conceived notions. (Who said "kept"  black women didn't like their white "sugar daddies"? Or "house" slaves  didn't like being their massas' favorite bedmate? You thought wrong.  Get real. )

 

 Fast forward to 2025 where, in the present, diversity exists and individuals are free to choose a mate for whatever reason suits their situation, and this includes being in love, something you try to denigrate because it doesn't align with your malicious, lewd narrative. You have a one-track mind and assume everyone is as preoccupied with sex as you are.

Nor do  you seem to have the least idea  what aphrodisiacs power and intellect can be.

 

 

4 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

Like I said, psychological warfare is real.

Yes, particularly as it applies to you black men, many of whom still equate having a white wife as the icing on the cake when it comes to "having it made" in America.  "Real", indeed. This idea is deeply entrenched in the black male psyche, and is his Archilles heel.