Jan 6th Pipe Bomb Suspect Arrested & Confessed

[ProfD]

https://www.npr.org/2025/12/04/nx-s1-5632646/fbi-pipe-bombs-arrest

 

5 years later, a suspect has been arrested for planting pipe bombs at DNC and RNC locations on January 6th.

 

To everyone's surprise, the suspect is a Black man:

 

 

Brian Cole Jr. Is a 34-year-old from Virginia. He has confessed that he believed the 2020 election was stolen from POTUS OJ.

 

Let's see if this young man gets pardoned for his crime. The other January 6th folks have already been released.

[Troy]

2 hours ago, ProfD said:

He has confessed that he believed the 2020 election was stolen from POTUS OJ.

maybe he is saying that in hopes of getting pardoned.

[ProfD]

2 hours ago, Troy said:

maybe he is saying that in hopes of getting pardoned.

Right. I'm waiting to see or hear whether or not POTUS OJ addresses it in one way or another.

 

 

[aka Contrarian]

The FBI was able to trace him because in surveillance videos he was wearing a certain distinctive brand of Air Jordan gym shoes. They were so expensive that only a limited number were sold. They zeroed in the credit cards of the purchasers and where they lived and finally narrowed it down to him after matching his location and appearance. A slam dunk. 

[Pioneer1]

He confessed to believing that the 2020 election was stolen, but did he confess to actually planting those B's???

And why would he put them under BOTH the Democrat AND Republican locations?
That doesn't make a whole lot of sense, if it's true.

Then again.....
The more I look at and listen to some of these Trump supporting niggaz, the more I feel that movie "Get Out" is based in reality...lol. 

[ProfD]

9 hours ago, aka Contrarian said:

The FBI was able to trace him because in surveillance videos he was wearing a certain distinctive brand of Air Jordan gym shoes.  A slam dunk. 

I see what you did there. Well played. 

 

The FBI has had the same information for 5 years.

 

They also traced the pipe bomb materials back to Home Depot receipts.

 

The question is why wasn't his azz picked up sooner by the previous administration.

[Pioneer1]

2 hours ago, ProfD said:

I see what you did there. Well played. 

 

Lol....but was it original?

If I were to check elsewhere online, I wonder how many times will I find that same joke in circulation?

[Troy]

On 12/6/2025 at 9:27 AM, Pioneer1 said:

And why would he put them under BOTH the Democrat AND Republican locations?
That doesn't make a whole lot of sense, if it's true.

 

Wait, THAT is his action that makes no sense to you 

 

 

 

[Pioneer1]

18 minutes ago, Troy said:

 

Wait, THAT is his action that makes no sense to you 

 

There's a difference between something making sense...and actually agreeing with it.

If a man suspects his girlfriend is cheating on him and he starts stalking her and hanging around outside her house at night peeping through windows and shit.
....I don't agree with what he's doing.
He shouldn't do it.





....but I understand

It DOES make sense.

[ProfD]

2 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

If a man suspects his girlfriend is cheating on him and he starts stalking her and hanging around outside her house at night peeping through windows and shit.
....I don't agree with what he's doing.
He shouldn't do it.

....but I understand

It DOES make sense.

Depends on how one defines making sense. 

 

The scenario provided above doesn't make sense to someone who doesn't understand or see the point in tree-boxing i.e. stalking someone.

 

To someone who doesn't believe in peeping around, they might believe it would make sense to ask the person suspected of cheating if it is true. Wait for answer. Don't interrupt.

 

Common sense and making sense can be slippery slopes.

[Pioneer1]

ProfD

 

As I said, there's a difference between something making sense and actually AGREEING with it.

What I mean by making sense is:  following a logical pattern

 

Just because something makes sense or follows a logical pattern, doesn't mean it's the best option or best thing to do.

 

Law enforcement investigates and tracks down suspects of crimes based on logical patterns like MOTIVE and OPPORTUNITY

 

A man stole $20,000 from his job.
-Why did he steal the money?
-His daughter was sick and her treatment costed money.
-He was the teller at a bank.

 

The logical pattern is that from the pressure of his daughter being sick and the money it costed to treat her, and since he work with and around that kind of money all the time and could get it....he broke the law and committed a crime.

 

Was that his best option?
Probably not.
But you DO understand why he did it right?
It DOES make sense as to why he did it even if YOU wouldn't have done it, right?
 

[ProfD]

52 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

That I mean by making sense is:  following a logical pattern

 

A man stole $20,000 from his job.
-Why did he steal the money?
-His daughter was sick and her treatment costed money.
-He was the teller at a bank.

 

The logical pattern is that from the pressure of his daughter being sick and the money it costed to treat her, and since he work with and around that kind of money all the time and could get it....he broke the law and committed a crime.

 

Was that his best option?
Probably not.
But you DO understand why he did it right?
It DOES make sense as to why he did it even if YOU wouldn't have done it, right?

Based on the scenario, I understand why he did it.

 

From a logical perspective, instead of committing a crime he could have:

 

1) applied for a bank loan

2) started a GoFundMe

3) borrowed money from friends and family 

 

Breaking the law doesn't make sense considering the consequences.

 

Based on the circumstances, the judge and jury might give the man less time in prison for stealing the money.

 

Therefore, his actions don't make sense and could possible make a bad situation even worse.

[Pioneer1]

ProfD

 

Based on the scenario, I understand why he did it.

 

Ok, now we're getting somewhere......lol.

 

From a logical perspective, instead of committing a crime he could have:
 

1) applied for a bank loan

2) started a GoFundMe

3) borrowed money from friends and family 

 

While this is true....there's ALWAYS better ways to do something.
If we were going to point to better alternatives to determine whether or not something was logical or made sense....what WOULD make sense in this world?

Just when you thought of the best way to accomplish a goal....you or another person may immediately be inspired with an even BETTER idea to do it!
The ideas don't stop.

Better options don't render the former options illogical or senseless.

Human beings live in houses made of brick, concrete, and steel today.
It's certainly an improvement on the mud huts people stayed in in the past.

But the fact that human beings built mud huts to live in....and still do in some places....is LOGICAL and MAKE SENSE because humans need shelter.
Even if it's a BETTER alternative to live in a brick building, it's still logical and makes sense to stay in some sort of shelter.
 

An example of something that doesn't make sense would be for a man to sleep out in the elements with rain drops splashing in his mouth while he's snoring.
That's senseless.

Breaking the law doesn't make sense considering the consequences.
Therefore, his actions don't make sense 
 

There's a difference between saying something "doesn't make sense" as a figure of speech, and truly believing that a particular action literally doesn't make sense.
 

You're using it as a figure of speech.
But you KNOW it made perfect sense for that man to gaffle up that money to help his little girl!

 



and could possible make a bad situation even worse.
 

Just like better alternative actions don't necessarily render a particular action senseless; neither does negative consequences.
It depends on the consequences
 

The consequence of going to prison for stealing that money may be heavy, but the consequence of his little girl DYING may be even HEAVIER and harder for him to deal with or even live with, knowing he could have gotten his hands on that money and saved her...but didn't.

[ProfD]

21 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

Better options don't render the former options illogical or senseless.

Committing a crime is not a better option. It might be easier or faster but the consequences may render the juice unworthy of the squeeze.

21 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

An example of something that doesn't make sense would be for a man to sleep out in the elements with rain drops splashing in his mouth while he's snoring.
That's senseless.

It seems senseless until you realize that man was getting a bath while he was asleep.

21 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

There's a difference between saying something "doesn't make sense" as a figure of speech, and truly believing that a particular action literally doesn't make sense.
 

You're using it as a figure of speech.
But you KNOW it made perfect sense for that man to gaffle up that money to help his little girl!

I meant it literally doesn't make sense to commit a crime in order to solve a problem.

 

21 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

Just like better alternative actions don't necessarily render a particular action senseless; neither does negative consequences.
It depends on the consequences

Only the individual(s) can detemime whether or not suffering the consequences of their actions are worth it.

 

Someone sitting in the sidelines cheerleading and agreeing that committing a crime makes sense doesn't have to pay for it i.e. do the time.

 

21 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

The consequence of going to prison for stealing that money may be heavy, but the consequence of his little girl DYING may be even HEAVIER and harder for him to deal with or even live with, knowing he could have gotten his hands on that money and saved her...but didn't.

It's all good as long as the individual is perfectly fine with going to prison especially if the little girls dies anyway.

[Pioneer1]

 
ProfD

 

Committing a crime is not a better option. It might be easier or faster but the consequences may render the juice unworthy of the squeeze.

 

The question isn't whether or not it was better, but whether or not it was logical or made sense.

 

 

 

 

It seems senseless until you realize that man was getting a bath while he was asleep.

 

Lol...not unless he was sleeping naked.
And if THAT was the case, and the authorities see him....he wouldn't be sleeping out in the elements for long.


 

I meant it literally doesn't make sense to commit a crime in order to solve a problem.
 

To you, perhaps.....
I can't argue that.



 

Only the individual(s) can detemime whether or not suffering the consequences of their actions are worth it.
Someone sitting in the sidelines cheerleading and agreeing that committing a crime makes sense doesn't have to pay for it i.e. do the time.
 

Correct.



 

It's all good as long as the individual is perfectly fine with going to prison especially if the little girls dies anyway

Now wait a minute.......

That's not part of the scenario...lol.

 

This scenario was hypothetical.
Her dying wasn't actually part of it; only the POTENTIAL for her to die if he hadn't stolen the money...which he did.

If he stole the money....and he did...the only logical outcome for the girl would be to live.

 

Now whether or not he actually went to prison was to be determined.
Like you said, the judge or jury could be understanding and either reduce the sentencing or dismiss the case all together.
 

[ProfD]

39 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

The question isn't whether or not it was better, but whether or not it was logical or made sense.

Right. It is neither logical nor does it make sense to commit a crime to solve a problem. 

 

39 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

Lol...not unless he was sleeping naked.
And if THAT was the case, and the auth.orities see him....he wouldn't be sleeping out in the elements for long.

Now wait a minute.......

That's not part of the scenario...lol.

 

This scenario was hypothetical.
Her dying wasn't actually part of it;

Took a page out of your book in embellishing the scenario.

 

39 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

Now whether or not he actually went to prison was to be determined.

Like you said, the judge or jury could be understanding and either reduce the sentencing or dismiss the case all together.

That's a chance the individual takes and has to deal with the consequences. 

 

Further embellishing the scenario, if the individual does end up in the penalty box, hopefully, he won't think every other inmate is a sympathizer.

 

Another inmate will pretend to sympathize, buddy and butter him up. Better know how to protect himself.