Mel Hopkins Posted 21 hours ago Report Posted 21 hours ago UN backs resolution calling slave trade ‘gravest crime against humanity’ RFI Thu, March 26, 2026 at 4:08 AM EDT 2 min read A memorial sculpture by Sandrine Plante-Rougeol in Bordeaux, a historic slave-trading port, where the legacy of the transatlantic slave trade remains central to debates on recognition and reparations. (AFP - GEORGES GOBET)More The resolution – proposed by Ghana – was adopted to applause by a vote of 123 in favour. The United States, Israel and Argentina opposed the measure. There were 52 abstentions, including the UK and all 27 members of the EU. Ghana's President John Mahama, one of the African Union's most vocal supporters of slavery reparations, was at the UN headquarters in New York to support the vote. "Today, we come together in solemn solidarity to affirm truth and pursue a route to healing and reparative justice," said Mahama. "The adoption of this resolution serves as a safeguard against forgetting." Transatlantic cruise to turn spotlight on Brazil-Angola slavery past Despite being non-binding, the resolution goes beyond simple acknowledgment and asks nations involved in the slave trade to engage in restorative justice. It also highlights the legacy of slavery via "the persistence of racial discrimination and neo-colonialism" in today's society. "The transatlantic slave trade was a crime against humanity that struck at the core of personhood, broke up families, and devastated communities," UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said. "To justify the unjustifiable, slavery's proponents and beneficiaries constructed a racist ideology -- turning prejudice into a pseudoscience." During discussions over the resolution, US ambassador Dan Negrea said the text was highly problematic. "The US also does not recognise a legal right to reparations for historical wrongs that were not illegal under international law at the time they occurred." He added: "The US also strongly objects to the resolution's attempt to rank crimes against humanity in any type of hierarchy." The UK and EU countries put forth similar arguments while acknowledging the wrongs of slavery. "The resolution risks pitting historical tragedies against each other that should not be compared, except at the expense of the memory of the victims," said French representative Sylvain Fournel. Heroes who fought to abolish slavery honoured in Paris Pantheon expo For African Union officials, the language of the resolution is central to its purpose. Amma Adomaa Twum-Amoah, the AU’s Commissioner for Health, Humanitarian Affairs and Development, said clearly naming these events removes any lingering ambiguity about their nature. “It is to say that what was done to Africans was not a tragic accident of history, but the result of deliberate policies whose legacies structure today’s inequalities,” she said. “Justice begins with calling things by their proper names.” Beyond recognition, the resolution encourages countries historically involved in the slave trade to engage in processes of restorative justice. Ghana’s Foreign Minister, Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa, has been explicit about what that could entail. “The perpetrators of the transatlantic slave trade are known – the Europeans, the United States of America,” he told reporters. “We expect all of them to formally apologise to Africa and to all people of African descent.” He pointed to the return of looted cultural artefacts as one possible step, alongside continued efforts to dismantle structural racism and, potentially, financial compensation for affected communities. 1
Pioneer1 Posted 20 hours ago Report Posted 20 hours ago A LOT of people have been talking about this online Russia and China apparently support it. 1
Mel Hopkins Posted 20 hours ago Author Report Posted 20 hours ago 1 minute ago, Pioneer1 said: Russia and China apparently support it. Weren't the Russians, and Ukranians Slavs? The Slavs were enslaved back in the 9th and 10th century. If they supported it , it would make sense. The U.S. kicked China out of the U.S. country in the 19th century. "In 1882, Congress took up the power to restrict immigration by banning the further immigration of Chinese."
Pioneer1 Posted 20 hours ago Report Posted 20 hours ago 9 minutes ago, Mel Hopkins said: Weren't the Russians, and Ukranians Slavs? The Slavs were enslaved back in the 9th and 10th century. If they supported it , it would make sense. The U.S. kicked China out of the U.S. country in the 19th century. Yep. Most people don't know that this is where the word "slave" comes from....the Slavs Places like Yugoslavia and Czechoslovakia and Slovenia....the slavic regions of Europe where the Arabs and Africans used to go and get slaves to bring back to the Middle East and North Africa. Called "Mamlukes" So.... Are you done hibernating? Like a bear or groundhog.....lol....you've decided to come outside and join us for the Spring? 1
Mel Hopkins Posted 20 hours ago Author Report Posted 20 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said: Yep. Most people don't know that this is where the word "slave" comes from....the Slavs I was included. I didn't know until this semester. I'm taking this awesome history class at my local university.
Pioneer1 Posted 20 hours ago Report Posted 20 hours ago 8 minutes ago, Mel Hopkins said: I'm taking this awesome history class at my local university. Come on now.... If you're looking for a young man....there are less expensive and time consuming ways to find one, than that.....lol. 1
Mel Hopkins Posted 19 hours ago Author Report Posted 19 hours ago 45 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said: Come on now.... If you're looking for a young man....there are less expensive and time consuming ways to find one, than that.....lol. OMG! Do you know that my ex-husband said the same exact thing LOL! | I'm not on the campus this semester. I've only registetered for asynchronous online classes.
ProfD Posted 19 hours ago Report Posted 19 hours ago Awesome gesture introduced to UN by the West African nation of Ghana. There should be no confusion among FBA/AfroAmericans about where our birthplace stands as it relates to the original sin of slavery & acknowledging it through a series of actions including recognition, apology & reparations to name a few.
Pioneer1 Posted 17 hours ago Report Posted 17 hours ago Mel OMG! Do you know that my ex-husband said the same exact thing LOL! Maybe I'm subconsciously auditioning for the same exact role. But then again, maybe saying shit like that is one of the reasons WHY he's your "ex"....lol. ProfD There should be no confusion among FBA/AfroAmericans about where our birthplace stands as it relates to the original sin of slavery & acknowledging it through a series of actions including recognition, apology & reparations to name a few. Both FBA and ADOS have made it crystal clear that ONLY descendants of American slavery are entitled to Reparations from the United States. If Ghana and other African nations had a SERIOUS shot at somehow FINESSING some money and resources out of the West and even the United States in Reparations payments...I wonder would the most outspoken representatives of these movements eat humble pie and get behind their program, lol. That's why it's not good to burn bridges.
ProfD Posted 6 hours ago Report Posted 6 hours ago 10 hours ago, Pioneer1 said: Both FBA and ADOS have made it crystal clear that ONLY descendants of American slavery are entitled to Reparations from the United States. Right. FBA/ADOS/AfroAmericans are having a hard time getting Black politicians to put forth reparations legislation. 10 hours ago, Pioneer1 said: If Ghana and other African nations had a SERIOUS shot at somehow FINESSING some money and resources out of the West and even the United States in Reparations payments... Of course, if pressed on it, the US & every other country involved in the transatlantic slave trade would turn the tables on the Africans nations that sold folks into slavery. 10 hours ago, Pioneer1 said: ...I wonder would the most outspoken representatives of these movements eat humble pie and get behind their program, lol. That's why it's not good to burn bridges. The bridges built between FBA/ADOS/AfroAmericans & other Black folks isn't strong enough to present a united front or offensive. The movement for reparations requires organization & codification.
Pioneer1 Posted 13 minutes ago Report Posted 13 minutes ago ProfD Right. FBA/ADOS/AfroAmericans are having a hard time getting Black politicians to put forth reparations legislation. Half of these niccaz can't even agree on what to CALL themselves. One group identifies as Black. Another group identifies as African American....but that term is swiftly fading out Another group says FBA Another group says ADOS A handful of us identify as AfroAmerican Then you got some niccaz way over in the corner digging up some old as "Freedmen" name that ain't been used in 200 years...lol. Talk about an identity problem. Of course, if pressed on it, the US & every other country involved in the transatlantic slave trade would turn the tables on the Africans nations that sold folks into slavery I'm beginning to serious question how valid the claim IS that they "sold" us. And how common was that the case, as opposed to being kidnapped? I think there are a few tribes like the Dahomey who may have an oral record or tradition of participating in the Slave trade but besides White folks making the claim, how many Africans themselves have admitted this based on historical information passed down? The movement for reparations requires organization & codification Facts. In actuality, I've been saying for years that we as AfroAmericans can GIVE OURSELVES Reparations if enough of us gain enough power in the Legislative and Executive branches. We'd only need a critical mass of White and Latino politicians to help us do so.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now