careycarey

Her words drew me closer. I couldn't wait to rest in her arms. Her voice had the mezmerizing tone of sweet drops of rest; rain lighty dropping on peddles out side my window. I called her my Goddess. This is not a Harlequin romance novel. It's about meeting someone who had touched my heart. She was beautiful on the outside but her words were my aphrodisiac. She expressed herself with the fearlessness of a wise queen. Her voice, although soft, aroused my soul like the anticipation on the night before Christmas. Heaven must be like this, it surely must be like this. I surmised that she could have chosen any man as her constant companion, which forced me to ask, why me? Why have I fallen prey to the sweet perfume of her voice? Could this be love, or is it my imagination. Is there such a thing as love at first sight and has it captured me? I am a very cautious man. My history tells me to protect my heart, as if it was the keys to my last dying breath. But I would relinquish those keys if I could forever stay in her bliss. Oh stars, Oh God, what destiny does thine hold. Should I stop this mental agitation. Tell me why? Do I dream as a man that wishes on a star? Should I let her walk away? If I so dream, I wish to take her with me. I want to spend more time with her. More time to do it over and over again, and again, and again. If I could, I would, stay in her flow, her glow. Hurt is a man that has a dream that he can't show, I wonder if she knows? I am going to lay down and dream. Again and again, I am going to dream of her! I have to dream because I want to go back to the way it was, because I don't love her anymore. It was my secret, not our secret, she was my secret lover and she spoiled my dream. She didn't even know, yet I was captured by her stately grace, her rhythmic pace, but I found out she was married to a white man. Yes, I am not proud of it, but I have to admit, I have a thang against black women that have white men as their mates. And see, she didn't even know me, yet, I was enthralled by her outer beauty but most importantly, I was under the spell of her intellectual prowess. However, that love is now gone. Her words have been spoiled by the color of a man's skin. My prejudice has driven a wedge between me and my dream come true. She whispers, but the love is gone. Her words now fall on deaf ears. http://careycarey-ca...usband-and.html

Cynique, you need to bow down and kiss my feet. Without me, you'd have no reasons to lift your skirt. See, this issue is not about me. It's about questioning your own motives to do what you do. Obviously there's no shame in your actions. It appears as if your growth is stunted. Don't have me "out" you by telling everyone that you are one of my constant visiters @ my blog. Don't make me do it. Why don't you tell everyone what you are looking for when you stop by? Now, unless you want me to "prove" why I make that claim (which I CAN DO). Speak your peace. If not, keep doing what you do, and run from the truth and get in the way of progress. Why don't you write a thought provoking post instead of laying on my jock?

"BUT YOU AIN'T EVEN THINKIN' BOUT DAT, IS YA?"" Excuse me! The whole premise of my argument is that loose lips sinks ships. You're old school so you've probably heard of The Last Poets. Well, one of their coined phrases is "Niggas Will Jive and Bullshit". "(I do not have to "define what I hope to achieve". What I hope to achieve is to voice my displeasure of him and his actions" Bingo baby, there it is! A wise man would have a hard time admiting that. I mean, you've just cleaned up the whole debate. If a person cannot define the reason behind their actions (specifically to themselves) it's doubtful they will achieve their intended reward because as you said, you CAN NOT define what that is... other than the soul purpose of running yo mouth. NIGGAS WILL JIVE AND BULLSHIT! Thanks chris, you've made my day. As long as you can't define the reasons behind your actions, you will forever be lost. But here's a come up, it's all about emotions. It's the driving force behind everything we do. That opinion may be a little too deep for you, but think about it. You don't have to agree with me, but think about it. Through-out the course of your day, think about what compels you to do what you do (on any level) and you'll find an emotion/feeling.

Well cynique, you've proven my point and you said it. You're not clever! Just like I predicted, you said nothing new and you didn't use one "I" statement. And you're afraid to answer my questions. I am done with you. Hitting an old midget with a brick could land me in jail. I am gone, you're boring me to death. Please search google for some new material. Seeeesh. I will not be back on this thread, so you can check my spelling and have at it. Wait, would you like for me to start your comment? Here it goes: Carey is... and Carey is.... and Carey is.... and he thinks..... and carey thinks.... and Carey accuses.... Carey never.... Carey doesn't....

MORE>>>> Carey, most people are followers and some are so convinced they are leaders that they repeat what other people say and think. You can't convince them of anything because they don't have an original thought they just don't know how brainwashed they really are. That's why they all sound the same and make the same complaints because they are all leaders! LMBAO

Hello, Let me give yawl a taste of a gentlemen that's not affraid to speak the truth. FreeMan said... I'm clapping at this post as it seems Bro. Carey has decided to go back at the Black CNN spots that do nothing but hate via intelligent discourse. I think you hit the nail on the head with "unconsciously soothing a soul that needs to sound intelligent." because somehow they feel BrObama has to hear them as they are the intelligensia of our race. I said in the past when Bush was here where were you then. Why didn't they feel they shouldn't let Bush get away with his wrongs. Primarily because their Black ass knew he didn't care and now BrObama is here so you come out of the Briar Patch to argue. We got a lot of wannabe HNIC syndrome cats talking for no other reason but they are Black. This is what happens when you put sounding intelligent over actually being intelligent. These cats offer no plans but just wait for the man who chose to take a chance to fail so they can seem like they know better. You are reading the words of cowards who watch MEN lead and sit back waiting for them to fall. I get tired of them too but I don't support the sites. How can you claim to be intelligent by collecting stories off the news and then offering your UNQUALIFIED, HIGHLY IGNORANT, OPINION. @Carey - Shitting on BrObama has become the Black intellectuals pastime. The problem is they sound exactly like the racist whites by attacking him from all directions. I saw on a site where people are saying is this Oil Spill his Katrina and I thought fuck some oil people died in Katrina. When a Man can't do anything important with his life he decides to shit on those who are. Somehow his failures to reach a position of importance manifest in homo-intellectualism. What you see on these sites are folks who didn't live up to what they thought they were and now they sit in their house creating make believe importance. The reason why they don't why they shit on people is because they don't want to say I could be doing something important but I'm not. OK that's all I got to say about that.

Get off that floor, Troy. Cynique might think she said something cleaver. Then you'd be responsible for her depressive state when she awakes from that dream. "Carey I have to say that I agree with Cynique and Chris for the most part" DUH, of course you would, your opinion is a mirror image of the overwhelming majority of those who do not have a defined purpose or insight into how damaging their words can be when voiced at the wrong time and in the wrong place. Which is way I have continually said, some negros think they are passing on Knowledge when they are doing nothing more than mimmicking the words of his opponients. You're guilty of the same crime of moving away from the central point. I've never said Obama doesn't possess a few dificiences. To a large degree, many "im-po-tant" negros, who believe they are projecting an image of knowledge and wisdom, are merely speaking to an ego that needs constant stroking. So, they speak in a tongue that appeases the masses. Then, they are all filled up, but they've left behind nothing of substance. Take for instance your comments and those of your cohorts. Is any of those opinions something that's new? Nope! Can you tell me your intended purpose for giving me and others your view of Obama's alledged mis-steps? I doubt it. Consequently, without a purpose and a defined direction, you cannot... CANNOT tell me your opinions are needed... at least in it's present form. Look, if a person does not start their journey correctly, there's no way in hell they can figure out when they have arrived. How could they, they didn't even know where they were going! Any ol'fool can watch television and talk like a duck, but what would be their purpose. I can't answer that question, but I poise that question to you and other folks that are agreeing with your sentiments. What's your goal. What do you hope to accomplish by ranting about Obama's supposite errors? Listen, as long as you and those like you, continue to say what Obama "has not completed" instead of addressing my core questions, I know you are running from the truth. I also know why that is. You might have to admit that you don't have the answers, which might make you unfomfortable. You might be forced to change your mindset and lord knows that's a formidable task for most individuals. I now it's easier to ROTFLYAO, but it's hard to say that I might have something to consider. More importantly, by throwing me a bone, a person might have to question their own motive behind berating Obama. See, that's not for the weak of heart. That takes deep soul searching. None of you have told me why YOU do what YOU do! Get it? Spare me the speech on Obama. Look over your comments and your "puppet friends", and tell me why you/they voiced them in open forums. And, if you're couragous enough, tell me if your goal has been accomplished. but remember, if you do not have a defined purpose, you might want to check your motive. From our many conversations, I think I can write most of the replies. They will be filled with ambiguous rationalizations and have little or nothing to do with the core of the person. They will be absent of "I" statements.

OuuuuuuWeeee, I 've never been with an 80yr old woman, but I love it when you talk nasty.

Okay. I'll take that as your white flag. I'll stop beating the dead horse.

Cynique said: Your whole gripe, Carey, seems to be that if a person can't say something good about the president, they shouldn't say anything at all. Just keep quiet and maybe the problems will go away, huh? There is, however, such a thing as constructive criticism. It looks like we are moving in the right direction. Now, "contructive criticism" is the optimum words. Then, I believe it's important to voice those words with a very keen eye on the purpose and direction of those words. Balance is also a good word that should be part of the solution. Without such, they frequently do more harm than good.

Cynique, I understand the struggle of answering the question. See, you answered with "How more specific can anti-war groups get?" Look, you know that's an ambiguous group/answer/response... right? That's not specific and it's not your voice. You do understand that "anti-war" groups do not speak for the happy im-po-tant negro, right? Beside, whomever THEY MAY be, does not speak to the core of this post. In fact, you have again evaded the question. You opened a previous comment with "Not surprisingly, I pretty much agree with Chrishayden" Yep, you sure do. Both of you are not speaking for yourself. You've been brainwashed to believe your rants (mimmicked voices of Obama's opponents) is somehow "constructive feedback" that reaches his desk in a tightly wrapped package.

Cynique, you still have not addressed the central issue. HOW are you making him accountable? Specifically, what avenues should be used and why? What's the specific plan? Until a person answers those vital questions, they are doing nothing more than whislling in the wind and chasing their own tail. And of course, as my original post suggested, their are negros that want to "sound" important, so they mimmick the words of the other im-po-tant negros and/or those hating white folks. Intentions are one thing, but without a road map the journey is sure to fail. And in this case, the consequences will be felt long after the misguided loose lips are done giving their opinion.

Well Chris, I do not know if you were intentionally trying to cloud the issue or derail the original message, but the following may be true. You said: "It is not up to me, a Negro of no importance to produce a replacement" Although you may have said that in jest, that mindset is exactly what I am talking about. The " I am not important" part of your statements, is reminiscent of those that do not have a defined reason for voicing negative rethoric about Obama. Although they may have a reason or excuse for their actions, they cannot define what they hope to achieve. More importantly, they seldom look at the risks and costs and rewards (if any) of their negative banter. And please, those that shout the phrase "we have to make him accountable" cannot define how they are "making" him accountable. In short Chris, if you and others do not feel as if you make a difference, then why even talk about it? I would say that you DO make a difference WHEN you talk about it. Other people are listening... that DO vote. Now we've come home. How does our words affect the vote in 2012?

Well Troy, a date is not complete without a good meal. You know how it goes... 50 bucks man See, I am letting you off the hook for the pop & popcorn, that's on me. Wait, you New Yorkers might call them sodas. Now keep talking. Lets see, 50$ plus 2 sodas @ 5$ = 10$ Plus 1 large popcorn @ 5$. *click click ding ding* SIXTY FIVE DOLLARS!

I don't win anything. But see, that attitude(win or lose) is exactly why many people refuse to move off their opinion. Don't get me wrong, that's a natural human reaction, but it's nevertheless a response that impedes progress and/or positive solutions. Heck, who wants to be wrong? However, if we face every situation with a win or lose approach (especially when we don't agree with someone) opting instead to take a cynical view, then, on this issue (the presidency) we WILL be left with any old Tom, Dick or Harry. If a person is not concerned with "a replacement" or who will be the replacement, they are in essence telling me I shouldn't respect anything they say, because that's totally irresponsible behavior. Cynique said: "People have a right to hold the President of the United States accountable for his actions, no matter who he is. In fact, this is the duty of the "loyal opposition." You don't have to be a Republican to challenge the policies of a Democratic president, or be white to wince over the gaffes of a black president" HIP HIP HOORAY.... I agree 100% Cynique said: "Or do you have to come up with a suggestion for a replacement, just because you question who currently holds the office. Now, it's my opinion that if those "questions" are voiced in a way or in an envioronment that could lead to the removal of President Obama, I believe it's a responsibility of every black person to keep an eye on the future. From this black man's point of view, if I am going to have a hand in removing the president(in any capacity), "I", as a black man better concern myself with who could/would be my stepdaddy. Cynique, you have to agree (well you don't have to) that there are followers (monkey see, monkey do people), and there are leaders. I think that's a fact. I believe followers make up the core of our society. Consequently, the core of my post speaks to being aware of how your words can persuade others. In regrads to the presidency, if black people do not concern themselves with the future which is coming, it will repeat itself with any ol'Harry Bo Scary.

See Chris, you're in the same rabbit hole with the rest of the im-po'-tant negros. All that "good talk" but yet "YOU" have not or WILL NOT speak for yourself. You went to la-la land with... "Americans don’t care to have a wimp in the White House. They’ll take almost any outlandish vulgarity from their commander in chief and give him a positive job-rating" What about YOU? Just stand up and say you are a card carrying banjo man. You did see the photo?

Chris, your answer does not apply. We live in a democratic society that has a president as our top leader. So, if not Obama than who? See, your response is very familiar to the negro naysayers that talk that BS about Obama, but can not produce a replacement. Consequently, I am left to wonder if they really understand why "they" blast him. More importantly (as I stated in my post) do they believe their words will serve to keep him in office or remove him? Soooooooo, if not him then who?

Look at that monkey-see-monkey-do-negro [ picture of negro in blackface playing a banjo not included here]. He's a smart nigga too. But what's he playing on that banjo? Well, if you listen real good, he's playing Mr Charlie's favorite tune, stomp that colored fella. Let me cut to the chase. Some negro political blogs should change their names to BootyForSell. That's right, flash a red sign and adorn it with purple lips and a fat ass. You know, them big booty lips that compliment deep ass kissing. But wait, dez some smart Negros that may not know the errs of their ways. I mean, they have great writing skills that most would die for, but they ain't talking about a gawd damn thang except what Obama has done wrong. Listen, I am a ride or die Obama supporter that.... "HOLD UP CAREY, WHEN ARE YOU GOING TO STOP HERO WORSHIPING?" No, you hold up and you can blow that outcha ass. I mean, you should define hero worshiping. I know you may believe that's a clever phrase, but it's nothing more than a tired and trite remark that allows you to run from the truth. Get back to me with your definition of a hero worshiper. But first, tell me, who would you rather have in office, Obama or Mr Charlie? I know the Banjo Man (or Lady) will have a hard time answering that question. Well, since they claim to be supporting Obama's mission, they can't say Mr Charlie. On the other hand, if they say Mr Charlie, I'd say "give me his name" who would his replacement? And, since these are smart Negros, they wouldn't say anybody except President Obama. I mean, that reply would instantly discredit them. And lord knows what that would do to their egos. That reminds me, I believe much of their whimsical hater-aid is rooted in an ego that's in grave need of constant stroking. What else could justify their negative rants about our presidents? "But Carey, we can't give him a pass just because he's black" Who said anything about a pass you knuckle head? And again, if not Obama than who?! See, some folks wish to run from that question. Really, that's the big elephant in this house. If you can't stop the elephant, then your house will become very raggedy. Malcolm said, "if your kitchen is dirty, your house is dirty" So, would it be right to invite someone to a nasty home? Remember, the elephant is still there. He ain't going to disappear because the question is side stepped. Consequently, until the chicken head naysayers can tell me the purpose behind their eloquent dissing of President Obama, I can't help but believe they are unconsciously soothing a soul that needs to sound intelligent. More importantly, they have to know their words are a cheap cloned edition of Mr Charlie. I wish they would just speak the truth and come out of the closet. I wish they would change their blog names to Black Booty For Sale: The place of intelligent BIG BOOTY for your Disposal. "But again carey, we can't give Obama a pass because he is black, we have to make him accounting" Okay, one mo gin for all the circle jerks. Do you really think you are making him accountable by mimmicking the words of his arch rivals?! I mean, really? Even if you say yes(some fool would say that), what's the payoff? Would your words move people toward Obama or away from him? Don't duck now, but the Big Ass Elephant is still in the house. If not Obama than who? I know this post will not get me invited to soft music and satin sheets, but as Martin Luther King said, "Many people fear nothing more terrible than to take a position which stands out sharply and clearly from the prevailing opinion. The tendency of most is to adopt a view that is so ambiguous that it will include everything and so popular that it will include everybody" So do me baby, cuz I ain't scared. Use me to do the thangs you do, because I sho am using you for the thangs YOU do. Picture here .....>>>http://careycarey-carrymehome.blogspot.com/2010/06/nigg-please-your-choice-obama-or-mr.html

[Carey]The rest of us know you play fast and loose with the truth to make a point, and ignored the "exaggeration". Well Troy, I think It's time I take the 5th. But look, I have to admit that I knew going in that it was a Tyler Perry flick, and you're right, why should I expect anything different. I just couldn't resist giving you a little S***. "I would recommended it for a date (with a woman)." Yep, and that's what got my dumb a** in the movie. Really, I was with one of AALBC's finest. We had a good time. Tomorrow I am off to the Goodman Theater in Chicago. The play Cynique recommended has it's final performance on Sunday. So, I am going to check it out. But See, you owe me fifty bucks for your "lead" on Tyler Perry and I hope I don't have to knock on Cyniques door.

Okay Bookfan, you got me. He was scantly clad. Good catch. It's nice to see that someone is reading.

"It would be like going to see Iron Man and then complaining that the movie sucked because of the impossibility of Stark pulling an iron suit out of a briefcase which allows him to fly faster than sound, and repel bullets. At some level you have to suspend disbelief, relax, and try enjoy too yourself., relax, and try enjoy too yourself" No Troy, I don't believe that's correct. From the jump, Iron man is a comic book character. Therefore, our "belief" is set. Now, how would you classify Perry's films? I mean, each one (other than Madea) has a different theme. Are you saying we shouldn't require a quality product regardless of its genre/topic/classification. Besides, what was "married too", a comedy, a drama, a joke or what? "At some level you have to suspend disbelief, relax, and try enjoy too yourself" You're right about that, but at what point would that be? I can't believe I let you convince me to see this movie. AND, I was with another AALBC alumni. Yep, we were cussing you as we struggled through this farce. Okay, we didn't cuss you *smile* but on the next rip I'm going to listen to Chris. You owe me about 50 bucks for that date

I visited a web site called Shadow and Act. It bills itself as On Media Of The Afican Diasporia - Empahasis On Cinema. It's one of my favorite places to get the real low down on black cinema. http://www.shadowandact.com/ Today they highlighted Tyler Perry's trip to the UK to promote his last film. Janet Jackson went with him. Now, I remember my man Troy say this film was the best he has seen from Mr Perry, and he enjoyed it. Well, I want to tell Troy to turn his underwear back around because this flim was a chick flick with a capital Ceeshy! Look, strip Tyler Perry of that wig and his grandma dress, and there's nothing left. The boy does not possess one iota of acting skills. The plot was a farce and the script was no better. There was no chemistry between the actors, which by the way, was another 10 toes down. Who chose these people to play opposite each other? I know we can't choose someones mate but come on, Lamman Rucker from Meet The Browns and Jill Scott? But wait, how about Louis Gossett Jr, and Cicely Tyson? How would you like to see a tender exchange of their lips? Don't get me wrong, although I've never been a big fan of Lou Gossett, he's one of the saving graces of this poorly written screenplay. I am going to write a review of this movie but first, check out this lovely screen. Janet Jackson has just lost her damn mind. Her and her guy (malik Yoba) are having some problems. So, although Janet is a phycologist (yeah, Janet Jackson is a doctor) she can't control her emotions. Since Janet is the primary bread winner, ol'boy wants equal rights. I mean, upon separation he wants part of her loot. When Janet hears his demands, she sends him a birthday gift. It's a lovely 10ft cake adorned with the most beautiful ribbons and bows. Now, I was thinking she was waving a white flag of agreement. See, the cake arrived at her husbands place of employment. But lord have mercy, the top popped on that cake and out jumped a naked transvestite. Then Janet shows up calling her husband all kinds of punks and Mfers. I'm talkin' right in front of his co-workers. If that wasn't enough, I can't wait to tell you about the mad-camp-ness of Michael Jai White and his wife, crazy butt Tasha Smith. This wouldn't be a Tyler Perry film without a black women shooting a pistol and showing her a$$ like a wild bangladesh monkey. SMH!

Nawl Chris, you gotta first show us your hand. I mean, what's your take on the issue? I can speak for ABM... "GAWD DAMN! LOOK AT ALL THAT A$$"

OH NO! Not Famous Dave's Devil's Spit sauce! AND cooked 9 hours overnight in a 190-degree oven? Gurl, you sho know whatchu talkin' bout. And, after all that slavin', you let Dr. Man put his feet in it. Now see, that's real love . I mean, obviously he's done that before. So, lets see, my plate is wrapped, right? The dog been fed, right? Black folks can come in your neighborhood, right (read your blog *smile)? You live somewhere in the Mid West, right? Okay, hold on cuz I'm comin'. And don't let Chris Hayden get near my plate. You know he loves some pig. But wait, were they beef ribs? Hey, you didn't say... no baked beans or cole slaw? I'm not even gonna ask about potatoe salad. I know you don't know nothing about that

"Can the argument be made that Black men are ogres, not the other way around?" Oh boy, that's a little too deep for me. Besides, "To me, clear vision involves, among other things, having hindsight, something which facilites having an overview, all of which comes with age. And one thing age teaches is that, except in math, there are no absolutes. History is always challenged by revisionists, and the research of social sciences devalued by flawed methodology. Even some of the Einstein's calculations have recently been discovered to have been predicated on the wrong postulations. And every year studies come up with a new theory displacing the old one about what causes things like breast cancer. "Facts" are relative. Anecdotal evidence is based on "facts". Bottom line, taking oneself too seriously is a stumbling block on the road to seeing straight ahead. IMO" *Wink* and a smile