-
Posts
2,378 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
90
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Everything posted by richardmurray
-
HBCU homecoming
10000000_829771831670989_9017498759102728366_n from Bryan Walker on Vimeo
Calling ALL #FindingYourRoots fans! For the first time in our show’s history, we are looking for one of YOU to join our season 10 lineup!
We want to hear about your family’s genealogical mystery that needs help solving. Go to http://findingyourrootscasting.com to enter.'We are the real Jews:' 100s of Black Hebrews march in New York City
Story by By MICHAEL STARR • 24 Nov
Hundreds of followers of the Black Hebrew Israelite movement marched through New York City on Monday in support of basketball player Kyrie Irving, who returned from suspension after he had shared a link on social media to a documentary that advocates BHI theological claims that people of African descent are the real Jews.
Purple-uniformed BHI adherents chanted, “We are the real Jews” and “Time to wake up,” according to a video shared by Creative Community for Peace director Ari Ingel (@OGAride) .
ESPN claimed that the men were members of Israel United in Christ. Another video shared by the popular Twitter account NBA Central showed the Black Hebrews lined up outside the stadium in which Irving’s first game since his suspension was to be played.Black Hebrew Israelite pamphlets
The Jerusalem Post obtained a pair of flyers distributed by BHI movement followers outside the stadium.
“The truth about slavery,” read one flyer. “The so-called Blacks and Hispanics are ‘the 12 tribes of Israel!’ You are the children of the slave trade!”
The flyer cited biblical passages warning the Jewish people that if they did not heed the Torah, they would be enslaved and placed in yokes of iron. The flyer pointed to that very practice being inflicted on the victims of the trans-Atlantic slave trade as proof of their identity.
Flyers distributed by Black Hebrew Israelites at the Brooklyn Nets NBA game on November 21. (credit: ERICA SCHACHNE)
A second flyer claimed to impart the “truth about antisemitism,” casting Jews as Amalek, who conspired to hide the “true identity of the Israelites and would work to prevent them from waking up in the last days.”
“There is a widely recognized pattern of enslavement, systemic oppression, bullying, legal manipulation and anti-black political lobbying, including silencing black voices in media outlets worldwide,” the pamphlet continued. “The biblical Israelites are targeted and accused of hate day and night without rest. Our knowledge of our heritage and laws has been systematically removed from us through the monstrous holocaust known as the trans-Atlantic slave trade. They may lie to the world and deny us of our birthright, yet Jesus the Christ, our Black Messiah, confirms the truth of who we are. We are not antisemitic, we are Semitic.”‘Not the real Jews’ perpetuates antisemitism”
The American Jewish Committee said in a statment, “Black Hebrew Israelites chanting ‘We are the real Jews’ is a troubling antisemitic trope with dangerous potential. We cannot allow this supremacist ideology to spread and gain greater acceptance. Claiming Jewish people are ‘not the real Jews’ perpetuates antisemitism around the world.”
AJC’s Avi Mayer described the BHI chants as being another side “of the same antisemitic coin” of the white supremacist “Jews will not replace us” chant.Black Hebrew Israelite beliefs
BHI beliefs have recently drawn attention with the scandals surrounding Irving and American rapper Kanye West.
Hebrews to Negroes: Wake Up Black America, the book series adapted into the documentary of the same name shared by Irving in late October, argues in favor of the BHI Jewish replacement theory. Irving was suspended by his team, the Brooklyn Nets, on November 3 in response to the athlete refusing to apologize.
The series became a bestseller on am*zon, Apple and Barnes & Noble’s online stores. According to the Anti-Defamation League, the series features passages from The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, and a quote falsely attributed to Adolf Hitler declaring black Americans to be the true Jews.
Activists, NGOs and even Hollywood stars have called on the book retailers to remove the series. Barnes & Noble removed the content from its website in response to public pressure.
West, who has legally changed his name to Ye, has also professed belief in black Americans as Jews. However, he has included Jews as another branch of the same nation, rather than impostors.
“The funny thing is, I actually can’t be antisemitic because black people are actually Jew [sic] also,” West explained at the end of a tweet in which he warned that he would go “death con 3 [sic] on Jewish people.”
In a statement, AJC director of black-Jewish relations Dov Wilker said it was “important not to generalize when it comes to Hebrew Israelites. Radical Hebrew Israelites are grouped under the Israelite umbrella that cites antisemitic conspiracy theories to explain the slave trade and preach misogyny, transphobia, homophobia, xenophobia and antisemitism. But not all Hebrew Israelites are Black and not all are radical.”
Erica Schachne contributed to this report.She said Mooo, I will never forget that.
@_lipstickguru_ @carine.dior I said “mooo” this time #bellababy #fypシ #pump #breastmilk #cow ♬ original sound - Ju’s Life funny after 15 years the vows are used, enjoy
@theschoolhousevenue Absolutely hilarious! Extremely witty + clever move by our bride, Christie, the other weekend during their ceremony vow exchange As a tribute to being together almost 15 years, Christie decided to “blow the dust” off of her ceremony vows in preparation for reading her vows to Byron! Byron’s Reaction = PRICELESS Ten Oh Eight Films @The Ten Oh Eight Co ♬ original sound - the school house venue -
Title: Scourged back by McPherson & Oliver, 1863, retouched
Description: Scars of a whipped Mississippi slave, photo taken April 2, 1863, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA. Original caption: "Overseer Artayou Carrier whipped me. I was two months in bed sore from the whipping. My master come after I was whipped; he discharged the overseer. The very words of poor Peter, taken as he sat for his picture."
NOTE: The New York Times writer Joan Paulson Gage, noted, "The images of Wilson Chinn in chains, like the one of Gordon and his scarred back, are as disturbing today as they were in 1863. They serve as two of the earliest and most dramatic examples of how the newborn medium of photography could change the course of history." [ read the second article below ]
Will Smith Responds to People Who Reject His Comeback So Soon After Oscars Slap: ‘I Completely Understand’By Zack Sharf
Will Smith’s press tour for “Emancipation” has begun, with the actor directly addressing moviegoers who are not yet ready to embrace his work following the Oscars slap earlier this year. “Emancipation,” a slavery drama directed by Antoine Fuqua, is Smith’s first major film release since the 2022 Oscars, where he took the stage and slapped presenter Chris Rock across the face over a joke made at the expense of Smith’s wife, Jada Pinkett Smith.
“I completely understand — if someone is not ready, I would absolutely respect that and allow them their space to not be ready,” Smith told journalist Kevin McCarthy when asked what he would say to moviegoers who aren’t ready for his comeback. “My deepest concern is my team – Antoine has done what I think is the greatest work of his entire career. The people on this team have done some of the best work of their entire careers, and my deepest hope is that my actions don’t penalize my team. At this point, that’s what I’m working for.”
Smith added, “I’m hoping that the material — the power of the film, the timeliness of the story — I’m hoping that the good that can be done would open people’s hearts at a minimum to see and recognize and support the incredible artists in and around this film.”
“Emancipation” is based on a true story and stars Smith as a runaway slave named Peter, known better to the world as “Whipped Peter” after photographs of keloid scarring on his back were distributed to show the brutality of slavery. The film follows Peter as he navigates the swamps of Louisiana to escape the plantation owners that nearly killed him.
In an interview earlier this month with Vanity Fair, director Antoine Fuqua defended releasing “Emancipation” in the same year as Smith’s Oscars slap.
“The film to me is bigger than that moment,” Fuqua said. “Four hundred years of slavery is bigger than one moment. My hope is that people will see it that way and watch the movie and be swept away with the great performance by Will and all the real hard work that the whole crew did.”
According to Fuqua, committing to release the movie in 2022 was “a full conversation with Apple” but “there was never a conversation with me and Apple or my producers about the movie not coming out.”
“Of course I wanted people to see the film,” Fuqua said. “My conversation was always, ‘Isn’t 400 years of slavery, of brutality, more important than one bad moment?’ We were in Hollywood, and there’s been some really ugly things that have taken place, and we’ve seen a lot of people get awards that have done some really nasty things. So I think Apple considered all those things, and we discussed a lot of those things. Then a decision was made by the people in charge of distribution and the money at Apple — and I’m grateful, I’m really grateful.”
“Emancipation” premieres in theaters on Dec. 2 and will stream on Apple TV+ starting Dec. 9.
"Wilson. Branded Slave from New Orleans," 1863, taken by Charles Praxson.Credit Private Collection, Courtesy William L. SchaefferIcons of Cruelty
BY JOAN PAULSON GAGE AUGUST 5, 2013 12:45 PMTwo iconic photographs of former slaves documenting the torture inflicted on them by their owners were widely circulated during the Civil War as anti-slavery propaganda, and both appear in the current exhibit “Photography and the American Civil War” at the Metropolitan Museum of Art. Although the images were extensively reproduced and helped to turn public opinion against slavery, the stories of the two men in these shocking photographs are little known today.
Perhaps the most famous anti-slavery image ever made is “The Scourged Back,” in which an escaped slave named Gordon poses to reveal the web of raised scars covering his body. An engraving of this photograph, attributed to McPherson and Oliver of New Orleans, was published on July 4, 1863, in Harper’s Weekly, along with the explanation that Gordon had escaped his master in Mississippi and threw the pursuing bloodhounds off his scent by rubbing himself with onions. After an arduous journey, he managed to reach the Union Army stationed at Baton Rouge, La., 80 miles away.
Gordon decided to enlist in the Union Army — something that President Lincoln had legalized only months earlier — and during the required medical examination, the officers saw his back “furrowed and scarred with the traces of a whipping administered on Christmas Day last.” They called for a photographer to document it. On April 16, 1863, S. K. Towle, surgeon, 30th Regiment, Massachusetts Volunteers, sent a C.D.V. (carte de visite) photograph of Gordon’s back with a letter to W. J. Dale, surgeon general of the state of Massachusetts. He wrote: “Few sensation writers ever depicted worse punishment than this man must have received, though nothing in his appearance indicates any unusual viciousness — but on the contrary he seems INTELLIGENT AND WELL BEHAVED.”
The Harper’s article also included an engraving of “Gordon in his uniform as a U.S. Soldier,” holding his musket. Little is known of Gordon’s military career. One published report said that he served as a sergeant in a black regiment that fought bravely at the siege of Port Hudson on May 27, 1863 — the first time that African-American soldiers played a leading role in an assault.
Meanwhile, the photograph of Gordon’s scars took on a life of its own as a weapon of the abolitionists. It was reproduced and sold in the carte-de-visite form by C. Seaver of Boston; by McAllister of Philadelphia, who first titled it “The Scourged Back”; and by other American photographers, including Mathew Brady. Another version was issued by a British publisher, titled “The ‘Peculiar Institution’ Illustrated”; an ironic reference to the euphemism for slavery used by Southerners.
On the back of the British version were printed remarks from newspapers, including this from The New York Independent: “This Card Photograph should be multiplied by the 100,000, and scattered over the States. It tells the story in a way that even Mrs. [Harriet Beecher] Stowe [author of ‘Uncle Tom’s Cabin’] cannot approach, because it tells the story to the eye.”
While the photograph of Gordon’s back may first have been made as a clinical document and then turned into propaganda, the C.D.V. photograph of Wilson Chinn with chains and torture instruments was from the start meant to excite anti-slavery emotion.
In December of 1863, eight former slaves were brought north from New Orleans, sponsored by the American Missionary Association and the National Freedman’s Relief Association. They were taken to photographers’ studios in New York and Philadelphia and posed in dramatic scenes for photographs, which were sold for 25 cents each to raise money for the education of former slaves in Louisiana. The other purpose of these photographs was to increase abolitionist sentiment in the North by using the fledgling science of photography to dramatize the evils of slavery.
Five members of the group were children aged from 6 to 11 — three girls and two boys — and four of them were so fair-skinned that they appeared entirely Caucasian, although all five had been born as slaves. The only adult in the series of photos, which were made by Myron H. Kimball and Charles Paxson of New York and J. E. McClees of Philadelphia, was Wilson Chinn, identified on most of the photographs as “a branded slave.”
On Jan. 30, 1864, Harper’s Weekly published a large engraving of the group portrait. In an article titled “Emancipated Slaves White and Colored,” Harper’s introduced each individual. Here’s the paragraph about Chinn:
“Wilson Chinn is about 60 years old. He was ‘raised’ by Isaac Howard of Woodford Country, Kentucky. When 21 years old he was taken down the river and sold to Volsey B. Marmillion, a sugar planter about 45 miles above New Orleans. This man was accustomed to brand his negroes, and Wilson has on his forehead the letters ‘V.B.M.’ Of the 210 slaves on this plantation 105 left at one time and came into the Union camp. Thirty of them had been branded like cattle with a hot iron, four of them on the forehead, and the others on the breast or arm.”
(The letters branded on Wilson’s forehead were not clear in the photograph, and the photographer, Kimball, had to retouch the negative to make them visible.)
The Northern photographers posed the children in fine clothes and sentimental poses with titles like “Oh! How I Love the Old Flag” and “Our Protection.” Wilson Chinn was posed in one scene, “Learning Is Wealth,” apparently reading a book to three of the fair-skinned children. But his other photos were meant to illustrate the savagery of the treatment of slaves. He was posed by Paxson in profile in the C.D.V. from the Met’s exhibit wearing a spiked collar and leg irons and holding a nail-studded paddle. (There exist at least two other versions — a frontal view by Kimball with the paddle on the floor and a third, also by Kimball, in which the instruments of torture are all on the floor. Wilson stands with his left foot atop the paddle — no doubt symbolizing that he is now free.)
The grisly images of Wilson wearing the spiked collar are the rarest and most valuable. In 2002 one of the Kimball C.D.V.’s sold on eBay for $1,846.
Jeff L. Rosenheim, the Met’s curator of photographs, wrote in the catalog for “Photography and the American Civil War” that he found the Wilson Chinn photo especially puzzling: “Paxson No. 8, Wilson Branded Slave from New Orleans … is a bewildering instance of Civil War photographic marketing that asks as many questions about the individuals who commissioned the portraits as it does about those who would purchase or collect these images.”
Undoubtedly Wilson Chinn, and even the children who traveled with him from New Orleans, knew that their role in coming North was to dramatize the evils of the “peculiar institution” from which they had recently escaped.
The images of Wilson Chinn in chains, like the one of Gordon and his scarred back, are as disturbing today as they were in 1863. They serve as two of the earliest and most dramatic examples of how the newborn medium of photography could change the course of history.
ARTICLE
https://archive.nytimes.com/opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/08/05/icons-of-cruelty/-
Troy < https://aalbc.com/tc/profile/9056-troy/ > stated
QuoteThe summary of a review of Emancipation from The Atlantic:
“Some viewers may be inclined to avoid Emancipation because of Smith’s and McFarland’s actions. But the mediocre film offers plenty of its own reasons for people to not watch.”
https://aalbc.com/tc/topic/9893-will-smiths-emancipation/?do=findComment&comment=57299
I reply to the article in the atlantic < https://www.theatlantic.com/culture/archive/2022/12/emancipation-movie-review-will-smith/672405/ > he linked using the folloiwing. Bold is from the article, italic is my reply
Given the minimal information available about the real man’s life story, the filmmakers have invented much of it.
I have never comprehended why that is an issue. The editor should had deleted that sentence because it is unfair to the film. Any film concerning the history of enslaved black people is by default, Historical fiction. "Glory" or "twelve years a slave" or other solomon northrup films plus the biographical fiction of his life or "abraham lincoln vampire slayer" or any film concerning the time when Blacks were enslaved to whites by law in the usa or in the british colonies is a fiction. Has invention. Why ? The visual bluntness of that time is a key part of its nonfiction. Any film that doesn't portray the visual bluntness of slavery is missing the point of why during its time, black people were paraded in the most cruel ways. It wasn't for nothing. The goal was to make sure, regardless of wheher you could read or not, you can see, what slavery was and its rules.
Smith looks just like the larger-than-life persona he’s played many times throughout his career. One character explains that Peter can “survive things most men can’t,” turning Peter’s story into, essentially, a superhero saga.
And what is wrong with that? Superhero sagas are the biggest money makers today and audiences tend to like them. Now she could had said, that this film made the same mistake Abraham Lincoln Vampire slayer did. In that, it is a historical fiction film involving the history of the USA and its historical abuses are not handled in a way that the modern audience can handle. But she doesn't make this point. She complains that Fuqua directs this historical fiction super hero film as its label suggest. That isn't a demerit. If I say something is a film noir musical involving the Valentine's Day Massacre, and someone says, a white female character burst out into a gospel solo song in an irish bar snapping her fingers three times really was disjoint from the mob scene just before with the men humming to each other, I will reply it is a musical. Film genre's have ways about them, that are specific and fans like those taste. If you are watching a space opera be ready for an ancient warrior to have a speech, even if it is not at a plausible time.
But Emancipation isn’t examining history; it’s indulging in fantasy. By turning Peter into a warrior, the film undermines the very figure it’s trying to honor. His image represented the horrors of slavery, and its dissemination helped further the abolitionist movement—yet his own, human story was not definitively told. Emancipation could have done that.
She commits four errors for me.
1st) Emancipation is a fictional film. She returns to her first main point, that this work of fiction is a work of fiction. The problem is, she desires an examination, which means what? she wants a rehash of old positions or some new statement to be made. But, the problem with historical truth is it holds few secrets after a while. What do I mean? Black people were enslaved to whites in the usa or the british colonies that preceded it. Said enslavement involved all the negativities you can imagine and the ones you can't. Case closed. What people like the reviewer want is a speech made. She doesn't want history examined. We all know enslavement in the USA. What she wants is preaching or proselytization. She wants Emancipation to say, relate to slavery this way. And while the film does do that by suggesting it be deemed a epic hero tale. She wants it to say people should relate to it as a story of survivors against abusers and that the abusers were "cancelled" through the war some call the war between the states. The problem is, as I said in the comment stream this first appeared in, Black DOSers in the Black community in the USA are free to relate to the usa as they want. That is what the examination should say. Can Black DOSers say, Black folk overcame oppression to be American? yes. Can Black DOSers say, Black folk need to kill America? yes. Enslavement doesn't require anymore examination. In films/music/literature it has been covered quite extensively. The concluding thoughts of the various artists to said work vary as their humanity. But, Emancipation the film doesn't need to provide any examination, First , as I said, the time period has been examined. Second, since the life of the man in the photo isn't known so examining it as she suggest is paramount to a public convenient lie.
2nd) She has taken a huge liberty here, and it is unwarranted. Why isn't Peter a warrior? First, what determines a warrior? the mythology in story telling from the song of sundiata or journey to the west to Thor Ragnarok or Into the Spiderverse is the warrior , whether superhero or adventurer or god or king, fights a battle against an enemy. The enemy can not be it's life. Sundiata/Son Goku/Thor of Marvel/Miles Morales or Peter Parker aren't fighting their lives. Their lives are generally happy. They are fighting the bad guys or gals. Her stated position suggest Peter is a survivor, not a warrior. But she is wrong. He is both. The enemy you fight is your life when one is enslaved. Cause your life isn't controlled by you, and it is a constant fight to develop/find/maintain oneself when enslaved. Peter is a warrior who is simultaneously a survivor, like all in human history, whether they be human or not, who live enslaved, at the whim, to another.
3rd) is related to the second. What is the potency of movements? Like what defines a warrior, she offers an idea but it is challengeable. The war between the states and the abolitionist movement are not connected as tightly as people think. I give the civil rights movement and the 1960s laws or court ruling [civll rights act/immigration act/voting rights act or brown vs board of education] in a similar light. I will use White european history to explain. Many call it the "fall of the roman empire" the movement of the barbarians against Roma was the tide. But the fall didn't occur and the source of the problem wasn't the barbarians, it was Roman culture. The word provence comes from the first place the Roman state/city state had taken over by military means. What is the point ? Rome's problem wasn't barbarians. IT was a simple truth. Their system of growth or existence by military annexation means the Roman empire in its entire history constantly tried to annex the outsider. Julius Caesar didn't change Roman culture, he simply changed the bureaucracy. Before and After Julius Caesar Rome was annexing outsiders. What are the problems with a culture of annexation? One, if your ever in a weak moment, the people you are trying to annex will be well positioned to attack into your lands because of your offensive posture. Two, as with all human beings, communities oppressed learn from communities oppressing. The barbarian leaders were in many ways, culturally attuned to Rome. That intimacy yields to great advantage. And, Rome in a very weak moment lost half of its annexed lands. But, history shows, that Justinean or another annexed it all back. So , even when the capitol of Rome went to Nova Roma, modern day Istanbul, sometimes called Constantinople, Roman culture was the same its entire history. When the Roman empire did Fall it was a city state, in said Nova Roma, being taken over by the Ottomans who, had annexed all of its former territories in the western mediterranean. So, the roman empire in its history, maintained military annexation or conquest and in all of its weakest moments <the fall at roma or the fall at nova roma >were raided by those it was at war with. That was the key. It wasn't the unchristian or journeyman culture of the vikings or the islam or fanatacism of the Ottomans, it was the nature of the Roman empire and the inevitability of its own nature. To the USA. The small percentage of enslaved black folk finding freedom or speeches of white or black abolitionists on pulpits didn't make the War between the States or the financial scenario of enslavement be the issue in or around that war. Nor did the photos of pregnant black women being hanged or marches by black baptist preachers make the civil rights act and analagous laws or court rulings. The war between the states problem is the infancy of the USA. The USA was founded with stolen land from a people genocided near to extinction while worked on by enslaved people treated to no decency at its financial core. While, the legal core was about a universal individual right, even against the government itself. None of the founding fathers had placed the financial truth of the USA in the legal framework of the constitution. This is why the articles came first. The whole point of the articles was to avoid inter-state wars. The problem is, the articles couldn't avoid, intra-state wars <wars inside states>. If slavery is legal at the federal level in the constitution the war between the states doesn't happen, plain or simple. Why? if slavery is legal then the states can't bicker on the federal level over slavery being allowed in any state. And after the war between the states, the south revitalized USA industry, when Black people were now put in the only enslaved position legal anymore, and that was in prisons. But, at the end of the war between the states, the lack of population truth in the legal framework caused the 1960s scenario. Yes, slavery is over, but now, you have half of the southern states with populaces that are half black, and have no wealth or ownership to themselves or in those states. And, the whites of the north are as equally if not more negatively biased to the idea of black wealth. so, reconstruction was bound to fail. Whites of the north as easily predicted would give their southern peers all their ownership back, to stop blacks or poor whites from creeping into the halls of power, and thus the communal structure of the south between the phenotypes was reinstituted by the wealthy whites with facsimile changes. The In the white community in the usa the abolitionist movement or back to africa movement was always fringe or impotent cause enslavement was and is the engine of the usa labor machine. Slavery is legal. What was the immigration act for? If tHe civil rights act said those not white male european descent have rights then the usa needs a horde of enslaved/immigrant people to come in and work for beneath market rate, by any means necessary. Did black DOSers march for immigrants, including black immigrants, to come into the usa and get jobs? of course not. Did Black DOSers, many who were hard core christians, march for LGBTQ+ , including Black l~+ , rights? of course not. Big events in the history of any country tend to be inevitables. The World War continued, World War II, because the USA/England/France told Germany , which was the leading industrial country in Europe at that time, to accept eternal extortion to the winners of World War I, the war to end all wars, for losing. They inevitably chose to fight again. The form was irrelevant. If it wasn't the national socialist it would had been another. Movements don't have the power history likes to suggest they do. In CHina, the Falun Gong or Buddhist especially with Tibet or Muslims especially with Ugyars problem is the creation of China under Citizen Mao. Mao hid in the defensive with the tibetans and muslims from Chang Kai shek's nationalist controlled China. But when Mao made the Chinese legal system he said no religion. And that has led to all these problems with staunch religious groups. Now the history of Christianity or Islam proves, given enough time, communities can be mangled into another form. But, the inquisition era had to kill and harm many for Europe to truly become Christian. The USA's labor problem is simple. MAchines, the perfect slaves, can do many things, and humans are not needed to be the laborers for the human wealthy. But, since 99% of humans are not the human wealthy, what will they do when they can't get a job? And a job is needed cause, rent/food/healthcare now must be paid for. Inevitable problems is what led and will lead to major moments in all governments in humanity. The movements are irrelevant to the source of the problem, they merely create or call for the facimile changes that do not improve conditions or stop the future inevitable incidents. Functional/Truthful government, any governmental form, stops problems. But said government rarely gets movements cause the truth or function tends to force harder choices or sterner realities, that many want to evade. You can wrap this up saying, the photo or the man or the abolitionist movement who advertised it were all for show.
4th) she publicly lied, though I blame the editor for lack of seeing it. She said in her own article that this film is fabricated on points of the life of the man in the photo. Ans states later that the story of the man in the photo is not definitively told. But, then suggest the film could not had fabricated a story on his life and made a definitive tale, when the truth is it couldn't. The story isn't known, that is fact. Any thing said about the life of the man in the photo is a lie at worst, a guess at best. and between a lie or guess is no definitiveness when it comes to a life's moments.
Despite a committed cast and often stunning cinematography, the film’s script is too blunt and the direction too ham-fisted to make Emancipation anything more than another rote—albeit expensive—entry in the slavery-movie genre.
Like all movie genres that are heavily saturated, from film noir to musicals to superhero, the slavery movie genre is heavily saturated. If you are looking for a film about slavery to be ephiphanic I think you are foolish at this time. The history is known and all the positions have already been presented in various media. You simply take it or leave it. But, judging it as demerited from your displeasure is unfair.
IN CONCLUSION
Like Hancock or Hitch, Will Smith is in a genre film showcasing himself and an idea with a character a little out of sorts from the norm in similar films. In Hancock he is a superhero absent frills or grand purpose, not unknown but not common. In Hitch he is in a romance movie playing someone who doesn't believe in romance while working as a romantic consultant, not unseen but uncommon . In Emancipation, he is in a historical drama about slavery playing a person in history with little to nothing known about them outside they lived, thus a canvas to imagine however one wants, not unique but rare. In Bright he is in a lord of the rings world, but with the framework of Alien Nation, not totally unknown but rare. Will Smith tends to be in films like this. They are slightly uncommon places in a genre. Sequentially, they tend to go hit or miss. The reviewer in my view, wants the film to be an artistic guidepost to teaching how humanity can become more positive functionally and from her words it plays out as a super hero film with a historic figure from slave times in the USA that can never be known in details. Clearly not everyone's cup of tea, BUT is that a problem? The Self righteous , sometimes called woke today, will suggest a problem, but will the world audience? The Woman King proves the global audience likes action involving Historical Fiction films involving the Black experience in relationship to Slavery. Not everyone's cup of tea, but money making, it looks like it. And will it have supporters on artistic merit? yes. The better position for a judge isn't there is much to not dislike, but it is an uncommon taste that you will love or hate or be unmoved from.
The first comment to the following post is of a similar man to Will SMith and provide a similar assessment .
https://aalbc.com/tc/profile/6477-richardmurray/?status=2141&type=status
-
-
My Reply
Bill T Jones once said, on Bill Maher's show, he was chided in the 1960s for a performance by other black people, and he said he thought the movement was about individual liberty.
But, what many Black people or other population minorities in the USA don't see/comprehend/know/admit is that the majority in all minority groups are not fighting to get individual liberties for all, but they are fighting to get majority liberties in their minority.
When the war between the states ended, the Black community was courted by white christian protestant groups for various reasons. But it made a hard space for Black agnostics or atheist or traditionalist <spiritual or religious beliefs brewed in the Black community during enslavement before the war between the states ended that are not christian ,ala Daughters of the Dust grandmother> . Frederick Douglass , a mulatto< a person with a phenotypically white parent plus black parent>, I feel was opposed to publicly supporting other options for Black DOS, <descendend of enslaved> who represented over ninety percent of the black populace in the usa at that time, largely in part because he knew all other options: a state in the union/leaving to canada or africa or haiti went against individual liberty growing in the black community. Which he himself needed as he had a white mistress and many Black people at that time, a recently completely enslaved people to whites , frowned on that.
Many Black people felt and some feel the Black community was used in the 1960s. The civil rights act was never meant to be an individual liberties act, which is what it is. It was meant to be a leveller for Black DOSers originally. But, the party of Andrew Jackson saw an opportunity to gain many votes by expanding the civil rights act to women/jews/asians or all non white european male christians, not merely Black DOSers, who sadly did die more than many others minorities for that civil rights act to be.
So, Olayemi's point is correct save one thing. It isn't internalized anti-Blackness as much as anti-minority. In USA history, Black used to mean , DOSers, over ninety percent. But, USA immigration policy with the immigration act of 1965 had a tremendous effect on the majority in all communities in the USA. The white communities Anglo Saxon Protestant majority already dealt with catholics or italy/ireland plus eastern european jews before joining the white community. But now, white latinos/whites of africa are coming in droves into the white community of the USA in such numbers they don't just merge into the WASP, they are their own. MArcus Garvey was from the english imperial island of Jamaica but now, the Black DOS community has to deal with Nigerians/Jamaicans/Haitians/Trinidadians/Ghanians/South Africans/Siddi of India plus other Black Asians of South East Asia in such numbers they don't merely absorb in the DOS community , they are on their own. The Asian community was once majority Han Chinese, white asians, by far, but now you have Bangladeshi/Indonesians/filipinos/iranians/pakistani in large numbers that being asian american can not be synonymous with the chinese anymore and the chinese american tradition of governmental non involvement is no longer the standard. LAtin American used to be Mexican , mostly mestizo, in the west coast and Puerto Rican, mostly blanco, in the east coast but now it is colombian/venezuelan/ecuadorian/chilean/ bolivian and not all blanco but also mulatto also negra also indio , meaning native american, so the complexity has risen and thus latino voting patterns seem all over the place.
All majorities in pen-population the USA, the native american in the usa is unique, before the 1960s have been reduced in potency by the individual liberties set in by the 1960s civil rights act and the immigration policy of the 1960s immigration act. So much so that the entire usa population as well as its parts: blacks/whites/women/latinos/christians/muslims plus all others are dealing with a plurality majority future that the former majorities didn't want, have not embraced for the most part, and thus the frictions in social media.
Bill T Jones a black man, legendary dancer, who is a member of one in the LGBTQ+ was fighting for Black empowerment as a subset of human empowerment. I paraphrase Sidney Poitier's character in guess whose coming to dinner: "you see yourself as a black human, I see myself as a human"
This is why MLK jr was so beloved by so many outside the Black community or so many minorities in the Black community. He was a Black christian preacher whose position was individual liberty. So he can get Black people who might not listen to a muslim- malcolm- or a jamaican- garvey - or a woman- fannie lou hamer- to march with him. But it is also why Black Militants/Segregationist had huge issues with MLK because they tend to not accept individual liberties. In the same way the KKK , while for white power, wasn't interested in white women voting or white members of the lgbtq+ having any protection or say or rights or white asians or white latinos being considered equals to anglo saxon protestants.
The issue isn't anti -yourself. The issue is anti- minority,which minority groups have within themselves.
Olayemi's prose closes with the fundamental idea of individual liberty. The only community that matters is the human. Those who support individual liberty fight for communities, like Olayemi or Bill T Jones in the context of greater individual liberty or freedom or protection. Unfortunately, in the Black community in the USA , this is not full explained or comprehended by many Black people.
I am not suggesting I support individual liberty universally, because I don't. But I comprehend it. And I don't have a problem with Black people whose actions reflect it.referral
[ https://twitter.com/msolurin/status/1596202896399687680 ]-
my sharing
The majority of the Black populace in the USA or elsewhere have a problem accepting/supporting minorities in the Black community having equal rights or powers to the Black majority. If you support universal individual rights or liberties then said supremacy by majorities is deemed a self hating thing, ala anti black. But, most people in majorities like the power in being in the bigger group, and despise potency in minorities whether real or unreal.
https://aalbc.com/tc/profile/6477-richardmurray/?status=2168&type=status
#rmaalbc #Olayemi #olurin #dos #ados #majority #minoritycomment on the original post
The Black majority in the USA has never dealt with Black minorities to well https://aalbc.com/tc/profile/6477-richardmurray/?status=2168&type=statusHistorically that is the way in the USA. The KKK would and will kill a gay white man. Most movements or groups in the USA didn't or don't accept universal rights in their community , but a large populace in the USA , maybe the majority, crossing all racial lines, accepts this.
https://twitter.com/msolurin/status/1596532205509316610
IN AMENDMENT
exactly, but from a historical view, the black communities agendas in the usa, for the most part , never supported black minorities specific causes. Black lesbians/black gays/black muslims historically were not accepted by the majority for their lifestyle. Now in 2022 things are what they are but historically not true
-
-
Giving Thanks
MELT YOUR HEART
“One year, [we] gave a boy about 8 years old a coat, tried it on made sure it fit him, he took it off and gave it back to me and I asked, ‘Why are you giving it back?’ and he said, ‘You mean I can keep this?’ and I said, ‘Yes,it’s for you,’” Richard Mantell, vice president of Middle Schools with the United Federation of Teachers, said. “And he came up to me and hugged me and it was hard to fight back tears.”
Article Link
[ https://www.ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/news/2022/11/20/hundreds-of-children-from-shelters-participate-in-thanksgiving-giveaway ]BEING OPPONENT DOES NOT ALWAYS EQUAL BEING ENEMY
Jon Stewart: "Penalizing someone for having a thought I don't think is the way to change their minds or gain understanding. This is a grown ass man and the idea that you would say to him, we're going to put you in a time out. You have to sit in the corner and stare at the wall until you no longer believe that the jews control the international banking system. Like, we have to get passed this, in the country, the ability to... Look, people think this. People think jews control Hollywood. People think jews control the banks. and to pretend that they don't, and to not deal with it in a straight forward manner. We will never gain any kind of understanding with each other. "
Colbert:"what do you imagine the right manner to be....what is the response"
Stewart:"First, I think reflexively naming things anti semitism is reductive as some of the things they might be saying, it immediately shuts down a conversation. ... Comedy is reductive, and I think part of what it is, is we play with tropes, because everyone has prejudices in their lives, and in the way they view things. And comics rely on those prejudices as a short hand for our material. Even the wokest of comics plays with tropes, to a certain extent. But my point is the most interesting thing to come out of this in my mind is something Kanye said. On his tour that he was doing after he said that, and then he got interviewed by five different people because the media model is arson and conflict. He said something fascinating in my mind. HE said hurt people hurt people and if the point of all this is then to heal people, the only way to heal a wound is to open it up and cleanse it. and that stings. that hurts. But you have to expose it to air. and I'm afraid the general tenor of conversation in this country is to cover it up, bury it, put it to the outskirts and don't deal with it and what I would say is, look at it from, a black perspective. Its, a culture that feels its wealth has been extracted by different groups, whites, jews, things, whether it is true or not isn't the issue. That's the feeling in that community. And if you don't understand that's where it is coming from, then you can't deal with it. and you can't sit down with them and explain that ... being in an industry isn't the same as having a nefarious and controlling interest in that industry and intention, right. And that has been the anti semitic trope. But you need to be able to meet people from what their community is feeling as well."
Colbert:"so you saying the way is to deconstruct it and tell them why it isn't with facts"
Stewart:"that's right, but if your not allowed to say it. You know dave said something in the snl monologue that I thought was constructive, as well. He said it shouldn't be this hard to talk about things. And that is what we're talking about. Look I can't pretend that there aren't a [expletive] ton of people in this country and this world who believe that the jews have an unreasonable amount of control over the systems. and they wield it as puppet masters. I've been called anti-semitic because I'm against Israel's treatment of Palestinians. I'm called other things from other people based on other opinions that I have. But those shut down debates. They're used as a cudgel, and whether it be comedy or discussion or anything else. If we don't have the wherewithal to meet each other with what is reality then how do we move forward is my question. I don't enjoy it. Don't get me wrong. When people i admire or whose music I like come out and say how many of you are in show business, you know... here is the deal... we have our own tropes. Like a white person's success is because of privilege, a minority's success is empowerment, a jew's success, that's conspiracy. You feel that. I feel that. But I have to be able to express that to people. If I can't say, that is Bull shit and explain why, then where do we go? and if we all just shut it down then we retreat to our little corners of misinformation and it metastasizes. And the whole point of all this is to not let it metastasize. And to get it out in the air and talk about it."
Video link
[ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6V_sEqfIL9Q ]Title: Sableye and Palmon Plushies for Charity
Artist: Tamarinfrog
[ https://www.deviantart.com/tamarinfrog/art/Sableye-and-Palmon-Plushies-for-Charity-938117299 ]
Hello everyone, it's time for a new Charity Project!A Charity-Guild Project!
This time we will be drawing or crafting Digimon/Pokemon as PLUSHIES!!
This project will benefit the Make-A-Wish Foundation [ https://makeawish.ca/ ]
Each submission received will add $2.50 to the charity pool.
If you are looking to sponsor this project, please send a note or email charityguild@tommyspuppetlab.com
How to Submit:You can submit to your gallery and submit to this folder [ https://www.deviantart.com/charity-guild/gallery/85373471/plushiemon-collab ] (Please tag me and mention this journal too please)
You may add your submission to sta.sh [ http://sta.sh/ ] or dropbox/drive and note me your submission if you wish to refrain from contributing to Deviant"Art"
We have a channel on our Discord server where you can submit
You can also email to charityguild@tommyspuppetlab.com
Submission rules:
All Deviant"Art" submission rules apply [ https://www.deviantart.com/about/policy/submission/ ]Artificial Intelligence (AI "art") is strictly prohibited from any of these projects. All submissions will be checked.
In order to enter, please comment on the posted journal which character(s) you are drawing. First come first serve, and reservations will be held for 2 weeks. After that, anyone can claim that character again.
All gens (1-9) and Digimon forms allowed. Even Wailord.
Do not add a background to your submission. I prefer transparent backgrounds, no big deal if you don't know how, just submit it on plain white background.
Anyone can enter regardless of skill. I will judge your art by your effort however. No quick doodles. Art from the heart is what matters most! Again, NO AI IS ALLOWED
If drawing on paper, please use UNLINED paper or it will be turned down!
NO BASES!!
No stock is allowed with exception of brushes, textures, pallets, etc... The work must be 100% yours at the end! No lazy work please!
Minimum canvas size 1200x1200. However you are welcome to use a bigger canvas if needed.
To submit, please see above
No work older than the launch date! November 21st
Deadline: January 5th, 2023
INVITATIONAL - for all information
[ https://www.deviantart.com/tommygk/journal/Draw-Craft-Pokemon-Digimon-as-Plushies-for-Charity-937980393 ]
Port Richmond High School students whip up Thanksgiving feast
By Jillian Jorgensen Staten Island
PUBLISHED 2:45 PM ET Nov. 23, 2022
Preparing a Thanksgiving dinner is always a production. But it is extra crazy when you’re preparing to feed hundreds of hungry teenagers who happen to be your classmates.“In this oven, we have some stuffing and turkey waiting to go out. In the other room we have some mac and cheese and more turkey,” James Ryan, a culinary arts teacher at Port Richmond High School, said. “Some of the students in my eighth period class [are] plating up the pumpkin pies for desserts.”
What You Need To Know
Hundreds of students in Port Richmond High School's culinary arts program worked together to create a Thanksgiving feast for their classmatesThey cooked about 300 pounds of turkey, along with sides like mashed potatoes and stuffing
The feast gave them an opportunity to show off the skills they are learning
It was something principal Andrew Greenfield is proud of
Led by their teachers, every student in Port Richmond High School’s culinary arts program helped put together a massive Thanksgiving feast. It featured about 300 pounds of turkey, 75 pounds of potatoes 100 pounds of yas and 32 pumpkin pies, Ryan said.“We're preparing here for probably about 400-500 students,” Ryan said.
It's a highlight for students in the culinary arts program, who spend all four years getting hands-on cooking experience. They're taught national food safety courses and have the opportunity to get their city food handling license. The popular program serves about 350 students a year.
All of them work on the Thanksgiving meal, with each class tackling a different dish.
“All 12 of our classes have had their hands in it. Not literally, but yeah, almost literally,” Ryan said.
And when the bell rang, the crowds arrived to grab their meals. For students who had worked hard on the feast, it was a moment to savor.
“It honestly feels amazing. I really love how we were able to come together and [prepare] such a big feast for the whole high school and it's just, I'm happy that all the work paid off,” junior Madison Gigliello said.
The meal initially started out smaller, with culinary students just cooking for one another. Over time it grew.
“Then last year after COVID, Mr. Greenfield and Ms. Woodman decided we need everyone together. We're serving a whole school. And it was a hit,” Ryan said.
It’s something principal Andrew Greenfield is proud of.
“What I love about this day is that we don't do a Thanksgiving feast for some students or families. But we do it for our entire school community,” Greenfield said.
And it’s part of what it makes so special for the culinary arts students.
“Every Port Richmond student comes here to try our food and take time out of their day to come try it,” junior Robert Eckman said.
The line stretched down the hallway. After grabbing a plate, students could sit down in the school’s cafe and enjoy a performance by the jazz band.
“You know, everybody’s Thanksgiving at home looks a little bit different, so we try to have a traditional Thanksgiving feast here at school, so everybody can get a taste of that,” assistant principal Suzanne Woodman said.
Families spend hours in the cold waiting for ICE appointments
By Eric Feldman New York City
PUBLISHED 11:00 PM ET Nov. 22, 2022
It was just after 2:30 a.m. on a crisp, cold New York City night. The temperature read 34 degrees, but it felt colder. It was the first truly cold day of autumn.“It’s pretty cold, even my foot falls asleep, even I can’t move my whole hand,” said Edi Kiste, who was bundled up in a line outside immigration offices in downtown Manhattan.
She spoke with NY1 as she held her two-year-old daughter, who spent the entire night outside with her.
“I bundled her up with three pants, a jacket, and like two polo shirts inside,” she said.
She said they were still cold.
On Lafayette Street, there are many strollers and children at this very early hour, all bundled up, all waiting.
One mom appeared to breastfeed her daughter on the curb.
These families are here for the long haul, bringing out cardboard boxes, backpacks and blankets to create makeshift beds.
They are choosing to spend the night on concrete.
Laura Godoi said she arrived outside 26 Federal Plaza at 7 p.m., which was 13 hours before her appointment with immigration officials.
“It gives hypothermia,” she said, describing the wait and the cold weather.
There’s a reason why so many people are lining up on a cold November night with their children.
They are waiting for their appointments with U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement, also known as ICE.
Many of those NY1 met said they are required to report to ICE after crossing the southern border in recent months.
By 3:38 a.m., the line has only grown.
“We got like 174 people,” said Carlos Estevez, looking at a manila folder he brought to organize everyone in line.
Estevez is not a community organizer. He himself was in line for his own ICE appointment.
He brought the folder because of his past experience lining up for his appointment — and could help explain why so many people are out here overnight.
“They say you can’t enter,” he said.
In a statement to NY1, an ICE spokesperson said the agency is “working to address current processing delays at some ICE offices,” attributing the delays being exacerbated by COVID-19 in recent years.
ICE only lets in however many people the agency can see in one day, no matter how many have appointments set up or how long the line is overnight.
On this night, it’s Estevez’s third overnight trip. Same for Angel Gomez, who said the night before, he got in line at 2 a.m. But that was too late.
Nancy Angeles had a friend waiting in line. Just before 4:30 a.m., she opened her car door, allowing a new group of the people in line to get inside her warm car.
“Whether they’re immigrants or not, they’re people,” she said.
By this time, the line wrapped not only around the block, but continued across the street.
At 5 a.m., the makeshift beds were folded up, because there was an effort to organize the lines.
Estevez led the charge, even though it’s not his job.
Within an hour, ICE started checking people in from two lines, one for families and the other for everyone else.
People got through past the sunrise until 7:48 a.m.
There were still what looked like at least 100 people in line.
“That’s it for the day,” said an ICE agent to the crowd.
The crowd stood there, wondering what to do next. Some talked to ICE agents. Others took pictures of a QR code provided by ICE to follow-up.
People in line, who spoke with NY1, were frustrated. Leonardo Caso showed up at 5 a.m. Edi Fernandez arrived at 4:30 a.m.
Both said they were too late for their scheduled appointments.
“You get up early, and well, they don’t give you a solution,” said Fernandez.
ICE officials said people who miss appointments should also reach out by email.
“When I send them, they didn’t answer me,” said Hamida Al-Hassam, who added that he also missed his appointment, despite getting in line around 3 a.m.
NY1’s video of the overnight experience outside 26 Federal Plaza is generating a response in Washington, D.C.
“There needs to be a more efficient and humane way for ICE to schedule and process people for check-ins and other appearances,” said a spokesperson for Sen. Chuck Schumer. “We are in touch with ICE and advocacy organizations to urge prompt improvements.”
Adrian Pandev is an immigration lawyer based in New York City. NY1 showed him the scene outside 26 Federal Plaza.
“It just shows that the system is not at capacity. It’s over capacity,” he said. “What a mess.”
He thinks most are trying to check in with ICE, as required, within 60 days of crossing the southern border.
“These people are waiting in the streets to comply with the rules,” he said.
He said each day they’re denied their appointments, it pushes them closer to missing their deadline, possibly complicating their status in the U.S.
“Noncitizens would not be deemed a no-show for their appointments if they utilize the QR code,” an ICE spokesperson said to NY1. “ICE would reschedule them.”
An ICE spokesperson said missed appointments do not have to be counted against people in line if they take the proper action.
-
Title: painting the sky
Artist: GDbee < https://gdbee.store/ >
Prior post
https://aalbc.com/tc/profile/6477-richardmurray/?status=2145&type=status
GDBee Post
https://aalbc.com/tc/search/?&q=gdbee&type=core_statuses_status&quick=1&author=richardmurray&search_and_or=or&sortby=newest -
Title: adastra <character from omari malik of blacktooth publishing>
Artist: shawn alleyne < Pyroglyphics Studio > OR < https://www.deviantart.com/pyroglyphics1 >
Prior post
https://aalbc.com/tc/profile/6477-richardmurray/?status=2073&type=status
Shawn Alleyne post
https://aalbc.com/tc/search/?q=shawn&quick=1&type=core_statuses_status&updated_after=any&sortby=newest