Leaderboard

That is a sweeping claim, but where is the evidence? First, Barack Obama did not “fail to win an Illinois seat by focusing on the Black vote.” He was already an elected Illinois state senator when, in 2000, he unsuccessfully challenged longtime incumbent Congressman Bobby Rush in the Democratic primary for Illinois’s First Congressional District. Losing one primary to an entrenched incumbent is not proof that Obama lacked political or legislative ability. I moved to Illinois in 2002, so I did not merely read about Illinois politics after the fact. I was an Illinois voter. Second, saying that Obama later won by “splitting the Black and white vote” and obtaining support from wealthy donors is not a serious analysis of the 2008 campaign. As a marketing communications strategist, I had the opportunity to study the “Yes We Can” and “Change We Can Believe In” campaigns closely. The first campaign was a masterclass in architecting a social movement. Reducing Obama’s campaign to speeches, commercials, wealthy donors, and appearances misses the central innovation: it built a decentralized civic movement in which millions of ordinary people became organizers, fundraisers, community leaders, and co-authors of the campaign’s meaning. (Obama's Lost Army) Successful candidates build coalitions. Obama assembled a multiracial electorate, attracted major donors, and developed an unusually broad small-donor fundraising operation. That is called campaigning. It is not evidence that he somehow “undid” Hillary Clinton’s rightful possession of the nomination. No candidate possessed the nomination by right. The nomination belonged to the candidate who won the delegate contest. Now to the allegation that Obama was “woeful as a legislator” and that the laws associated with him were “poor” and “dysfunctional.” Presidents do not personally make laws. Congress drafts and passes bills. Presidents may establish policy priorities, propose legislation, negotiate with lawmakers, advocate for bills, veto them, or sign them into law. Therefore, name the specific legislation you are criticizing and quantify its allegedly woeful results. During Obama’s years in the Illinois Senate, he worked on legislation requiring the recording of interrogations in capital cases and the collection of racial data from traffic stops. In the U.S. Senate, his work included federal-spending transparency and bipartisan efforts to secure nuclear and conventional weapons. As president, he signed the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, which restored workers’ ability to challenge continuing pay discrimination when they receive discriminatory compensation. He also signed the Affordable Care Act. You may dislike the ACA or object to particular provisions, but “I dislike it” is not evidence that the law was dysfunctional. Measurable outcomes are available for examination. According to the Obama White House’s 2016 assessment of progress in the African-American community, approximately three million uninsured, nonelderly Black adults gained health coverage after Affordable Care Act enrollment began. The report also documented 700,000 fewer Black Americans living in poverty in 2015, 400,000 fewer Black children living in poverty, historically high Black high-school graduation rates, declining incarceration rates, and 62 lifetime federal judicial appointments of African Americans. Yes, the administration itself issued that report, and its conclusions should be checked against the underlying federal data. Nor should every favorable development during an administration automatically be credited to one president or one piece of legislation. But the report still provides actual claims, measurements, and outcomes that can be investigated. That is considerably more substantive than simply declaring that Obama was “woeful” and that his laws were “dysfunctional.” I also personally obtained healthcare benefits through the Affordable Care Act, as did millions of other Americans. You cannot erase the people who benefited from a law merely by declaring the entire law a failure. And if Mayor Zohran Mamdani can be as consequential for New York City as President Obama was for the United States, then New York may be well positioned to preserve its standing as one of the world’s leading cities. There are legitimate criticisms to make of Obama’s presidency. There were compromises, policy failures, implementation problems, and unfulfilled promises. But “he gave good speeches and made terrible laws” is not an analysis. It is an unsupported opinion. So which specific bills produced the “woeful results” you claim? Which provisions were defective? What measurable damage did they cause? What evidence connects that damage to the legislation? Name the law. Identify the defective provision. Quantify the harm. If you cannot identify the law, explain the defect and provide factual evidence of the result, please do not tag me merely to repeat a political impression. I do not have time to debate accusations that their author refuses to substantiate.

I don't know if I'd call it genius over just being typical men....lol Most men like to keep a low profile. Many of us have learned....whether it was from dating, working, or highschool homies....that the less personal information people know about you the less "ammunition" they have if they ever decide to come at you, lol. I'm constantly getting on the females in my family about posting all of their business on social media. Posting their pictures. Posting their activities. Posting their full name and family history. Posting their children's pictures. Posting pictures of their new house or new car. Posting from their job letting everybody know where they work. Posting themselves in their underwear. Posting themselves laying in bed with a cold. Just putting out ALL of their information. I've warned them over and over again to stop putting all of their business out in the street like that, but most of them don't listen UNTIL something happens and they end up regretting it. They act like their can't possibly be some creepy mofo sitting in a dark room eating mushy frootloops with chocolate milk and building a profile of them to be his next stalking victim. The thought of it NEVER crosses their minds. Now about that photo........... 🤔 -Seems like I saw somebody who looks JUST LIKE her....in LL Cool J's "Around The Way Girl" video....lol.

Me too, and it is actually affordable 🥰

Most politicians especially at the national level, work within the special interests of the PACs & wealthy people who finance their campaigns. Only a politician not beholden to the money that put them in office can truly work for the greater good of the people. Such a politician has not existed for a very long time since money has run national politics for several decades. Surely, some are old enough to remember former POTUS Richard Nixon raising a bunch of money back in the late 1960s/early 1970s.🤣 Look no further than the current administration. Everything it does is to rearrange the deck chairs of power & to further enrich the global elite. IMO, any issues of class & socialism are distractions to keep the masses from focusing on the bigger picture. Coordinating chaos & confusion is a part of the game. There is no desire among the global elite to redistribute wealth &/or provide a standard of living that is beneficial to every human being on the planet.😎

@richardmurray I could be wrong, but it reads like you are conflating "Democratic Socialism" with "Socialism" at least you have used the terms interchangeably in your analysis. I don't think any sitting politician is advocating for socialism. That is a good definition, but I was say more simply, "Critical Race Theory examples how race influences society and perpetuates racism. What do you think? You have a penchant for verbosity, huh? I think this leads to a TL:DR reaction from potential readers of you posts. What do you think?

https://www.cbsnews.com/texas/news/civil-rights-attorneys-karmelo-anthony-appeal-pro-bono/ Looks like Karmelo Anthony will have a dream team of lawyers working pro bono on his appeal. Ben Crump himself doesn't appear to be one of lawyers but his firm is being represented. Getting a new trial &/or having his conviction overturned will be an uphill battle. No way are those white folks in McKinney, TX going to let these lawyers waltz into their town & turn it upside down.😎

And what? That is what the internet is for now right 😜 Of course it is, But that has always been what entertainment is about If Shakira was your run-of-the-mill 50 years old, who would want to see that? Maybe so. but I will not be the one doing them. I've had a YouTube account since before Google took it over 20 years ago. I have no interest in providing YouTube with free content and trying to monetize it.