richardmurray

from @banzaboiieatskilishi in blackartistoftumblr https://www.tumblr.com/communities/black-artist-on-tjambler/post/807542304814612480?source=share #blackartistoftumblr #banzaboiieatskilishi

from @qtcomicsblog in midnighthour https://www.tumblr.com/communities/midnight-hour/post/807490656286146560/charlotte?source=share #midnighthour #qtcomicsblog

from @banzaboiieatskilishi in blackartistoftumblr https://www.tumblr.com/communities/black-artist-on-tjambler/post/807453195178803200?source=share #blackartistoftumblr #banzaboiieatskilishi

from @banzaboiieatskilishi in blackartistoftumblr https://www.tumblr.com/communities/black-artist-on-tjambler/post/807379518921785344?source=share #blackartistoftumblr #banzaboiieatskilishi

from @banzaboiieatskilishi in blackartistoftumblr https://www.tumblr.com/communities/black-artist-on-tjambler/post/807357941428682752?source=share #blackartistoftumblr #banzaboiieatskilishi

A tautogram, a challenge is coming may 1st on @CRliterature on Deviantart with awards, be ready writers!! #madlemniscatemarch #hddeviant #deviantart #crliterature #richardmurray #kobo #kwl #rmaalbc #aalbc #richardmurrayhumblr #tumblr #tautogram

@ProfD Usa gives billions of dollars to egypt to, israel isn't alone in the money giving, many countries get usa money. andby 2026 this has been going on for decades.

@ProfD Is it a small feat? I think it is a positive feat, but I think it is a small feat, because like the white jew in the white populace, the rastafarian in the black populace is a quantity wise extreme minority. I don't think it is hard for small groups to achieve in fiscal capitalsm. The history shows this time and again. Anywhere in the world, the smallest groups among a whole tend to be the fiscally most potent. The native american fails in this but they have a problem , many of them want to live their heritage's way of life which doesn't fit the white european mold in the american continent. The absence of owning land is a financially huge. Many native american peoples believe in moving with the seasons which is the earliest human way of life. Said lifestyle has never financially fit , and I argue can't, with the all season home/hut/town/city/country model.

@ProfD IS there such a thing as a worst bank? which black bank is the worst, or that doesn't exist either? you used the word people all my examples were of black peope murdered by law enforcement and i have seen law enforcement against the armed, law enforcement is not less inclined to attack when they think someone is armed. I don't know where you get that from. beyonces mother used her other girls to support her daughter and didn't give them an even cut. that is a fiscal crime. Jay Z by his own admission hustled illegally in his earliest years which is a crime that most can't do . again, everyone with levels of money has done negativities to get there. it is the reality of fiscal capitalism. The myth is that you can make large levels of money without a cheat in somewhere. It is a simple truth of fiscal capitalism, the higher the monetary scale the more crimes whether legal or not. No. That isn't promoting white supremacy. If a black man is married to a white woman and both own their own businesses and he invest in her business as a minority shareholder, is he promoting white supremacy? No. She's redistributing wealth if the firm truly becomes Black-owned. so in your view blacks are free to fight amongst themselves financially, cause that is what any hostile takeover is. It is a legal financial fight. You can't have your cake and eat it too. You said Black empowerment .... Hostile takeovers of black owned firms by blacks doesn't bring unity but is allowed in your view. No. He's comfortable under the system of racism white supremacy. What is a black man owns a business in his home country, the usa, and doesn't view the usa as a system of white supremacy but of individuals, fighting each other for teh top of the fiscal capitalistic pile. Your saying as he enjoys his life, that he is comfortable under the system of white terror, but the black man in question and others like him will never be unified philosophically to black people who view the usa as a country of white terror not individual cannibalism. So your unity across the black diaspora goal for black empowerment is dysfunctional or can't apply, unless you plan on using a mind control machine/drugs/manipulation devices on said black man but then of course, that is slavery which I will never condone and definitely a crime, whether legal or not. Correct. Black elected officials have an obligation to serve & protect Black folks by any means necessary.😎 This is not legally true, every elected officials in the usa has an obligation to all the people under their jurisdiction and not limited to the people who are representative of their phenotypical race. that is the whole point of the constitutional assertion, that is the whole point of James Forten/frederick douglass/MLK jr/ Barrack Obama none of these black men viewed government officials of the usa having an obligation to serve any one particular group or anyone else in some cases. Again, in the usa, before the 1900s most people , including whites, thought being an elected officials was for the elected person's benefit. The way you view black empowerment with black elected officials goes counter to their reality in the usa or their legal parameters.

@ProfD dei prevents having it all, but it doesn't prevent them in having it all? do you realize your sentence here? no nyc has ten million people in it. this is not true, white jews are white, that is the protection. that is the problem with how people view them, white jews are white , yes white jews are a group in the white populace, but they are white and that is the protection they were heavy benefitters before then, the terror by german christians onto german jews was bloody but white jews in europe since constantine , emperor of rome in nova roma, had financial growth of a high level per their small populace. In moorish spain they had it. I argue they had more globally in pre nazi europe than after nazi europe, before nazi europe the white jew owned many things in europe and outside of it. The key variance today is israel . White jews financial reality is bloated. The numbers on the site I presented to you show the truth, the key to white jews isn't huge amounts of wealth but that a small populace again, fifteen million white jews compared to fifty two million black people in the usa is a huge difference. White jews owned black people. WHite jews killed native americans and stole their land. The most fiscally proftiable gang in prohibition was the white jewish purple gang. so... again, the people mentioning them aren't stating the parameters of their success. The people mentioning white jews are looking at white jews revenue but not the condition of their populace. mainland CHina has four to five million millionaires. Globally i think it is like twelve million. So the number of chinese , white asian, millionaires is bgger than the entire populace of white jews. https://www.statista.com/statistics/702759/china-number-of-millionaires/ BUT, the chinese populace isn't just millionaires, it is near two billion people, most of whom are dirt poor. Now, you and others idolizing the financial aspects of the white jewish populace , what do you suggest to diminish the quantity of fiscally poor chinese? should the chinese millionaires + billionaires kills the rest of the chinese? The chinese have more millionaires than the entire damn white jewish populace. So, now what? Again, large populaces can not be fiscally related to the white jew and anyone who tries it can't back up their stance by anything but stupidity. A community of ten people compared to a community of a thousand is not the same. The real reason people mention the white ew is cause many people are stupid and don't know to assess their own populace evenly to others.

@ProfD oh yeah, who was the king crowned? yes, the rastafarians is a minority tribe in the village, but the point about jamaica is how negatively they exist in jamaica amongst other blacks, whom they never have hurt, they simply don't concur on what the future looks like, which isn't a small thing.

@ProfD When the OAAU finishes its job, what does black empowerment look like and what doesn't it look like? Or are you suggesting OAAU need be in perpetuity which is dysfunctional. When will you be satisfied reparations is given? A goal has to have a moment where it is realized and that means what is as well as what isn't. What isn't reparations in your view? BAsed on malcolms points I argue those devices aren't what malcolm was talking about. Did black people make those devices? did black people make the ground lines and satellite networks to carry signals to and fro those devices? do black people own the data storage locations to create the apperance of seamless instant connection. Did black people design the protocol/rules system for the data? The black empowerment you mentioned first, where does that exist with black people using devices designed/created/manufactured by nonblacks? Do you use one? Which is the best black bank in the usa in your opinion? well... would weapons/training saved, abner louima? would weapons/training saved emitt till or trayvon martin? would weapons/training saved eric garner or randy evers or sandra bland or breonna taylor or sonya massey? Even the white militants don't fare well against law enforcement, so how can black people attacked by white law enforcers be better off with weapons or training? Certain levels of wealth can't be obtained absent cheating/ corruption/illegality/crime/ or whatever you want to call it. Again, the financial history of the usa is the proof. No one of a certain level of wealth in the usa didn't get there without a legal, I repeat legal crime./injuries to others. And the law can't protect from fiscal legal crimes, which can attack in the upper levels of finance. Self sufficiency defined as what? All the land in the usa is owned, and mostly owned by whites or owned by state governments who are dominated by whites. So, that means any idea of self sufficiency for circa fifty three million people will have a huge overhead cost that will undercut fiscal growth. It is going backwards to go forwards. Very expensive and taking into account random situations will be a very long term program which doesn't help. Autonomy? please define this. what actions can a black person do that do not undermine black empowerment? What actions can black people do that don't promote white supremacy? Does this fear apply to black people who don't feel afriad while don't feel the need to act in a way that your OAAU would deem fearful? if a black man is married to a white woman and both own their own business, if she wants to invest in his business is he promoting white supremacy? If a black woman does a hostiel takeover over a black owned firmed, financed by whites, is she undermining black empowerment? If a black man owns a business and doesn't invest in any of the initiatives of the OAAU but enjoys his life, is he afraid of dismantling oppressive systems to blacks in the usa? So if a black elected official is the mayor of a city and doesn't change the police department with a record of abuse towards blacks, said official is unwilling to fight white terror ? yeah ok

@ProfD we will see, but the history of the many oil rushes and many godl rushes and silver rushes in the usa prove that once the ability to get natural resources occurs, even with machines, wealthy people will want humans sent out there. part of the problem in outer space is energy/control systems. First, it takes time to send an electromagnetic signal. The earth has a diameter of circa eight thousand miles. Mars is nearest earth when the earth is circa thirty six million miles away. That means four point five thousand earths are between the earth and mars in a straight line when mars is cloest in its elliptical orbit. that distance means a time delay on signals. The mission around the moon is complex. the moon is two hundred and thirty nine thousand miles from the earth at times in its orbit about the earth which means thirty earths can be lined up between the earth and the moon. These distances are massive, and since star trek or star wars technology does not exist, current human technology has inherent weaknesses with the distances. if a machine breaks down on the moon, whose going to fix it? even if you have another machine, if it has any malfunction or inability to fix the other machine, it will not be easy to adjust it. And because of weight, and the influence that has on gravity, it is not easy to put a supercomputer or some modern chemical manufacturing plant in space. these things are very heavy. My point is , engineering wise, human beings will be needed. The international space station will be closing in a few decades, while the chinese already have their space station up there. But these space stations while top of the line in terms of modern tech are not full of amenities. the rich don't want to be in space. But i can see rich people offer chances for poor people to leave, how was the usa born but the english government seeing a chance to get rid of its poor people.

@ProfD true and if yu look at the industry of writing, writers with huge fanbases are constantly popular, putting out content, so ... it is interesting @aka Contrarian how do you know you will not be here? the AI future may start tomorrow

@ProfD well ok, but what will be the goal? Malcolm cited the points. And from them, he states a number of goals. 1) communication channel with africa, which makes sense cause chinese/dominicans/puerto ricans/jews with israel/indians/russians/ghanaians/agnlo saxon protestant whites.... all but one immigrant group in the usa willingly came from another land they constantly communicated with. The problem is our forebears were enslaved, the link was cut. And as said non Black DOS groups prove, the link is very grassroots, it isn't a grandiose. You leave china, your cousin and mom are still there. It isn't fancy. 2) becoming more learned about Africa, I argue this has been done. Can it be more? yes, but the goal can't be one hundred percent with over fifty million people. But libraries, private libraries still exist in the usa, they exist in NYC. 3) Textbooks written by black folk, it is hilarious to me, I asked in this very forum, for us all to work together on a history book project and... I will not name names, but the interest wasn't present. if a set of black people online who all tout black empowerment can't... 4) a bank, the freedmans bank existed but it failed, carver bank is still in existence but boutique. 5)A self defense organization or culture needs to be made. Of the five goals, only one can make money on its own. The other four are all expenses. 1) Communication channels require money/resources. The usa has spent alot of money on underwater physical lines . Satellites are in themselves cheap but placing them and their upkeep is expensive. 2) libraries are expensive. Through the self reliance this library will have to be private, which is not unheard of today but will be expensive. Location matters to. 3)Textbooks are expensive. Ebooks people can is less expensive, but they forget the devices to read them are not inexpensive, and more likely to weaken/wither over time than a book. 5) weapons cost money, especially if you are to fabricate yourself. yes mass market weapons are cheap cause the market is flooded, but to truly make a gun from scratch in bulk will be expensive. So of the plans he mentioned, 4 is the one, that can actually make money on its own and isn't a natural expense. The problem today is most of the banks in the usa of largest size all had corrupt origins. Chase is the rockefellers, who used it for various things. black people dont have a rockkefeller family to finance a bank. Bank of america was originally financed by the italian american mob. Black people don't have an illegal fiscal operating industry like that. Hang Seng banking corporation comes from hong kong which at one time was the opium capitol of the world, and had primary fiscal trafficking in and out of china. Big banks have very dirty histories. Small banks, rarely have the scale to do much. The only bank that went to jail/court for the banking crisis was a small bank from new york city, a chinese american bank ,, whose main clients were the street vendors in chinatown. and by my recollection they never traded in the shadow crypto banks like goldman sachs and company who begged for a welfare check, far worse than any fiscally poor black woman ever did, while not being demanded to change their operating procedures, or welfare to work. What do you think the goal should be? And yes, a goal must be. I Argue, the goal should be one thing only. A black party of governance in the usa. My reason being is the reason I have supported this idea alone in the usa for black people for a while. When I look at the history of Black DOSers everything has been tried financially. Any financial goal is merely a repeat of something already tried and after two hundred and fifty years, I argue trying is being hard headed, not wise. But, doing something you never did before is even in failure a new experience, that will teach something you have no experience in. I say a black party of governance is the best goal for such an OAAU if existed. hmmmm your answer here generates many questions. I will take it in parts. 1) define selling out explicitly? I think selling out needs specific definition because non blacks live in the usa, they are not going away. What does selling out mean, exactly? buying from a non black store? going into business partnership with non blacks? marrying a non black? I think we blacks leave the definition of such things open, going back to that textbook malcolm talked about and it will lead to problems down the road. cause what happens when the head of human resources for the OAAU wants to marry a white woman? Sellig out being described explictly today , makes the scenarios tomorrow easier to handle. 2) when you say fear what do you mean? I have never been afraid among my own people. I have seen some blacks talk about the neighborhood in fear but in my mind, that isn't fear, that is dislike. It is complicated when you dislike your own people but you can't move away from them, it is easier then to tout dislike. 3) well .. what defines comfort? It seems to me what you mean by comfort is black people who have reached a certain financial level who aren't engaging in the greater village. I have seen fiscally poor people in or out of the united sates of america and I have found no fiscal poor person anywhere to be comfortable. Living on the street is not comfortable. Living day to day is not comfortable. Now maybe I simply don't comprehend what you mean by comfort or what group you are talking about explicitly, but I will like to be enlightened. But based on your three points. The questions are, how does an OAAU, prevent members or exmembers or non members in the black populace in the usa from[ however you define the following] : selling out, living in fear, taking comfort while oppressed?

@ProfD Free itself from France, but also stay free from the likes of England/Spain/USA who all tried to replace france as its owner, and failed. Not just a major accomplishment to defeat four of the strongest navies in humanity at that time, legendary. Very bloody, many lives lost. I think of a man from north vietnam who once said, I paraphrase, he was the only one to return to his building, all the other homes in his building lost their youngest generations to the vietnam war. Legendary, extremely costly. well, but you forget the first problem is, the rounding up of black people was collective. the papers of the hausa caliphate literally state that their border towns dealt with raiders constantly taking families, whole towns. It was a serious problem. So... the point being, the relatives of the black people who bore fruit on foreign soil are those people who didn't make it across the big water. That female or male who became part of the ten percent who survived the trip, lost their mother over the water, their brothers, sisters, uncles, cousins. The town was gone. I never forget the film CEdou by ousmane sembene, I think from senegal and remember, saint lous was a big slave port. Individuals would be taken, as in the film, but the majority would be... groups of those not in power, undesiretable/poor... like the untouchable caste in india. So your correct in that those who died on the water, the ninety percent , didn't bear fruit in the american continent, but they were family, or at least clan to the ten percent who became our strict biological forebears and so for me, ... For me, the people who died over the ocean are more my forebears than their living relatives and descendents on the continent. Another great philosophical variance in the tribes of black americans amazing Based on Garvey's words I think it is clear, garvey didn't see the american continent as a home for Black DOSer. He comprehended that black dosers from canada to argentina, existed and were born or raised in said lands. But, from his point of view all of the american continent was anti black. And even in haiti I get his point. If anything haiti proves garvey's point about leaving the american continent. HAiti's problem sis the american continent. Canada/UA/Mexico/BRasil/Venezuela most of the lands in the american continet are run by those who are anti black. and during his time, Jamaica was a crown colony, where you had europhile blacks in positive positions. I argue Garvey saw jamaica even with its majority black population as white and that makes sense, cause if you consider how much trouble the rastafarians have in jamaica today while jamaica leeches off of the memory of bob marley, I think it is all clear. The blacks in jamaica... are very europhile, even back then. Now one can argue, maybe garvey should had given the english empire more thought. Sierra leone existed, maybe he could had worked to that. But Garvey clearly didn't care/trust/want to work with a majority of the whites on the land he was raised on. well said:)

@ProfD very funny Well, in the usa in 2026, all states in the usa get a welfare check every year from the federal government, without that federal check even California, which is touted , correctly, as the wealthiest state in the union, would have to go into receivership. So a black state would get by law, the same welfare check from the federal government. Every major city or city with the populace of New Orleans or more , biggest employer is the city itself. Detroit's biggest employer is detroit city, nyc biggest employer is nyc, los angeles biggest employer is los angeles city. No major city in the usa today has a bigger employer than itself. And every city gets money from the state, but if New Orleans is a city-state then instead of what new orleans get because of louisiana, which is white, the federal government would give new orleans, and if the legal system is still running then new orleans as a state can go to court if being treated unevenly to other states, and even the constitutionalists would have to vote in favor of new orleans. going back to article 4 of the constitution. Now as for private business in new orleans, well... pipeline, goes through new orleans, but the city gets a tax from that. And the pipeline isn't going anywhere. The pipeline will be against it cause it is another tax but if New Orleans gets through the stated legal situation to be a state the pipeline can't go anywhere. Next is the french quarter... moving a building is not cheap. Let alone finding a place for it. If they leave the buildings they can go but that will leave all the french quarter buildings for the city. The city can make laws in contingency for this. Let alone that many buildings in the french quarter are under historic preservation licenses so the city can use that to manage the buildings new owners of if city owned new use. The new orleans saints can move, though i think the nfl demands the other owners vote to allow these things which is expensive, and if the new state can provide a better scenario than louisiana, the owner of will stay. The whites of cajun country will not want to leave, they are tied to cajun country and if anything, a number of them will probably want to join new orleans the state if new orleans the state can make in its state law something cajuns have always wanted from english speaking louisiana and that is stronger protections for cajuns who are generally fiscally poor on their historic land. So... first the city is the biggest employer, but as for white businesses, all but pipelines can leave as you suggest but each is expensive. You seem to suggest money will just be made, I don't think so. it is 2026. Lastly, yes, small states tend to be ninety percent and above white, but the point of this stream wasn't to suggest new orleans , a black city, or detroit, a black city, will become a state. The point was to state the truth, that is detroit/new orleans/ and even white new york city, financially needs is a separation from the states they are in because each one of them is demographically too other from the rest of the state they are in. Each one of them is stymied, financially, by that truth, that only statehood can free them from. Again, the first projects in the usa were in NYC, NYC's plan, all white government, was to place the projects upstate new york, the diea was to keep the city white but offer places for the poor, the poor being mostly white themselves though people in the usa still don't comprehend most poor people are actually white in the usa, upstate. The proof is that the first projects in nyc to this day have never had anybody black in them and the white people in them are fiscally poor. But the white towns upstate new york have always hated/disliked/distrusted the , and I quote, the rotters of NYC. the law abiding white towns of upstate new york didn't want poor people of any kind and as NYC's population blew up with fiscally poor nonwhites, from here there or everywhere, NYC made more projects in NYC. But NYC was always at upstate ny states mercy because the governor of New York's main voting base isn't NYC, it is all the law abiding white towns above new york city that got or get away with killing/harming/injuring black people in the past to this day. So I end with my point, no financial argument to new orleans not becoming a state for its betterment holds any water.

@ProfD Right, even in DEI's height, most opportunities/advantages still went to white men. So, I ask the following after a preface. MY PREFACE most white men today are complaining that they don't have the 99% level of opportunities/advantages that they had till the 1960s hit. Their argument is that non whites/non males/ non christians or other groups opportunities /advantages are uneven. But that means their not merely arguing about having the majority, whether they admit it or not , they are arguing about not having it all. And DEI to be blunt, does diminish their percentage of advantage or opportunity, it doesn't delete them having the majority, but their problem isn't in having the majority their problem is in others having anything at all. MY QUESTION Doesn't DEI lessen the opportunities to white male hetero christians, even if it doesn't or can't lead to a diminishing of said white male opportunity/advantages into a minority place? IN AMENDMENT You mention DEI being an illusion. I can't concur to that because I saw black people or non white male christian ~ who benefited from it. Was DEI through fiscal management or fiscal strategies? no. If by illusion you mean it wasn't something that was determined through the fiscal marketplace, I concur 100% to you. DEI was engined through media/social pressure/a set of elected officials trying to sate a voting base. DEI wasn't through the market place, so the moment, elected officials changes or social pressure lessened or the media made poisonous, DEI was in trouble of being maintained, and all three of said things happened. But it doesn't mean it is illusory. It isn't through the marketplace. But I must say what should be common knowledge, the problem in the usa with those who are not white male christians ~ is that all of their populaces have a heritage of financial absence based on the militaristic power of said white male chrsitians~ . To restate, I once spoke to a group of women, all business owners, having a conference on womens business. I was invited by a female friend, who yes owns a business, and I was offered the chance to speak. So I told the women the truth as a man. Male wealth doesn't come from education or hard work or any of the things they mentioned they needed to do.. It comes from cheating, it comes from abusing, it comes from legal crimes, enslaving people legally. So women trying to improve the financial condition of women will need that same reality. And I mentioned rockefeller center. The elder rockefeller wasn't a genius, didn't have some grand schooling. Didn't have a rich uncle to help him. But the elder rockefeller knew how to cheat, was in an environment where he could cheat, white male law enforcement has always allowed white males various criminal fiscal activity legal or not. Women don't have that. But if women are willing to cheat or scheme they will find the same financial levels as men. But if women think they can follow the law and have some complex financial plan. I told them , I know of many black business owners, all very nice people, none of the them broke the law, all of them have struggled and worked hard every day and none of them ever got to the great halls of money. The point in that retelling is, black fiscal wealth, female fiscal wealth, muslim fiscal wealth, indigenous fiscal wealth, any group in the usa not white male christian heterosexual ~ in the usa is temporally behind said white male ~ wealth, none of them can recover lost time through the rules or what schemes somebody suggested will work. Now some will always mention the white jew. But as I have said in this very forum, I was unwilling to search for the post for I am pressed for time, the white jewish populace is very small. And financially you can't relate the jewish populace in the usa which is maximum seven million people with white german american/circa forty million, black americans[dos +modern immigrant]/fifty two million, female americans/one hundred and sixty seven million. The global jewish population is fifteen million people:) Why do so many people speak of the jewish population as an example of anything? unless they plan on killing most of their people to be so small in populace? And no, the white jewish model can't work for larger populaces. The poor white trash who are mostly german americans are in a populace that has a six hundred percent larger need of resources. The black american populace so many including other blacks call lazy or in need of better thinking or some negative has a seven hundred percent larger need of resources. And I don't have to explain how much black wealth has been undermined by whites in the usa i hope. People talk about Tulsa but how much generational wealth has literally been destroyed by white terror in the usa. Is their a financial way to calculate that lose? i don't really know. By the following website. https://dqydj.com/income-by-race/ a third of a million black people make sixty thousand or more in the usa today. So that isn't bad. Remember, we are still an abused peoples by whites, even today. yes, their are more opportunities today but when you consider, all the black towns in the former confederate are in financially restrictive places, and said black people in towns have no where to go. Their are issues financially, that must be considered with black people in the usa, that whites, even if jewish don't have in 2026. Based on whitey as well https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2021/05/11/economics-and-well-being-among-u-s-jews/ circa twenty six percent of white jews, who are simply white people of the jewish faith, have fifty to one hundred thousand, dollars Twenty five percent of seven million is, one million, and seven hundred and fifty thousand and this is from a white jewish populace that has never been denied business ownership, not merely in the usa but in the european countries that made the usa, has always been in the halls of money through banking, which offers them alot of connections that white abused minorities like the romani of europe/the gypsies never had. So I argue, in fifty years with hard work and accepting white abuse with a smile, the black wealthy in the usa will be as large in populace as the white jew in total, but that doesn't mean that the entire black populace in the usa can be wealthy absent access to slavery/genocide/or similar negative acts as tools of financial betterment.

@ProfD I don't know what relevancy your prose has. You asked me the following. I gave haiti as an answer, with full temporal comprehension. Then you replied with the above, which has nothing to do with the question you posed. but ok. You did not ask me about the condition of modern haiti, you asked what my tribe accomplished, i gave the truth. I don't know what your highlighted prose above has to do with the question you posed. What else can anyone who embraces the USA be? You said the USA is your country. I have no problem with that. But, the USA from its very beginnings was integrated. I didn't say the integration was positive, it wasn't, but it was integrated. And it still is today and will always be unless one populace becomes an overwhelming majority which is not going to happen any time soon. And the war between the states is the proof that whites internally have never seen themselves as unified as some nonwhites suggest. Even enough. But the usa will always be your home country because , unfortunately, for Black DOSers none of us have a country to return too. Our black forebears, which is what Henry Louis gates rjr shows dismisses so poorly, didn't come from one place in africa, they came from various places. As I have said in this very forum. Most of Black DOSers forebears were buried in the ocean, not any land, as 90% of the people in the boats died on the journey. Those are all Black DOSers initial forebears. And our initial forebears came from all over the continent of africa, not any one particular country, so unless the African Union is handing out citizenship. The double standard I referred to wasn't concerning haiti paying money, but the following. why Haiti being considered owing something is special or warrants note when I gave multiple examples of many countries, whites ones, that are still stated as owing even if they don't pay. so countries have relationships. And the reason isn't greed or corruption, it is simpler than that, it is haiti' uniqueness. I don't know why I have to say it cause you know or should know, that haiti was surrounded by slavers. Haiti's nearest neighbor is modern jamaica which at that time was merely a territory of the british empire and the country garvey wanted to escape which led him to be antiwhite, that is jamaica. so... The reason is when you are surrounded by enemies, it matters. Intelligence and strategy aren't godly things, they have limits, they can't make everything happen. A kid surrounded by thirty bullies will never kick all those other kids ask or smooth talk his way by them if they want to hurt him. Haiiti is special for those in my tribe. But my irritation is not from adoration to haiti but miscomprehension. You and pioneer love to veer in your prose. you have a question, i give a response, but then you respond to my response with something totally unrelated to my response. hell, go farther back, remember, black people of haiti literally left former saint dominique with their white owners to new orleans, so the heritage of haitians to the usa is arguably older than any other black populace anywhere outside the usa. yes that is why I call all the rich around the world the global one percent. every country today has wealthy people, including the somalias/kashmir/east timors of the world. A very small minority of people under any government are the most wealthy in their respective lands. hahah I am not trying to give a sermon, i have no pulpit in my home I was uneven to you and pioneer. Well... onto the future.

Do you know of Hazel Scott? Check out some of her music, tell me which one you like. Full transcript to the program in the link.

Economic Corner 19 While most in media focus on diversity/equity/inclusion or D.E.I. as opportunities for non white heterosexual christian nondisabled males, doesn't D.E.I. threaten an oldest fiscal heritage in the U.S.A. of unwarranted advantages or unbounded allowances for white heterosexual christian nondisabled males in the financial arena?

Economic Corner 18 What is the future of writing as a profitable activity? With the advent of computer programs to simulate writing at a quality acceptable enough for most, who will pay for human imagination driven writing over computer average based simulation writing, and why?

Economic Corner 17 Would you invest in solar power in space? as the NASA mission to go around/circumnavigate the moon is maybe march 2026 , what do you think are the most profitable energy industries in space travel in the future and why?

Is the USA the best country to build wealth in modern humanity? Is it better to be jewish in israel, or chinese in china , to build wealth? What country is the best place for blacks to build wealth in humanity and by what measure do you rank your answer?