Chevdove

Oh no. Those writings were not put on any printing press for almost a thousand years in some regards. No one believed that the lavish Temple complex in Jerusalem would be built or demolished. That's like another White House being built and told that it would be demolished by a meteor storm 70 years from now. Daniel lived 500s BC. Herod was not even born until like 30 BC. That's like us reading about something that will not happen until 2525 about 500 years from now. The prophet Zechariah prophesied about cars. If humans were that smart, then they would have been driving their chariots 2000 years ago and not being pulled by horses up until the days of John Wayne. The prophet Zechariah wrote that the horses were INSIDE the chariot. That kind of horse power 'engine' did not occur until Henry Ford was born. The Black Death Plague did not happen until AD 1335. Daniel wrote his book 1335 + 500 = 1835 years ago. Who could ever believe that there would come a time whereby, everyday, for about 200 years African children would be stolen from their homes and forced into massive slave ships for a year and made to lie in feces and on their sides, tightly packed for about 365 days. The prophet Ezekiel wrote that in detail, but it seems ridiculous to think that could ever happen or that world governments would do that and the human race went about their daily lives for 200 years as if it was normal!? . I can understand now, that it's possible to believe what is written about the meteor storm to destroy a third of the planet and prepare to live in caves during another ice age, in a sense but, on the other hand, just as in the past, most people that are high up in big governments don't believe it. Homeless people are being forced out of their tents, an already sad existence by the wealthy and powerful government with no fear of one day themselves having to flee back into live in Siberian caves if they are lucky. Jesus said 500 years after Daniel: [14] And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations; and then shall the end come.... [20] But pray ye that your flight be not in the winter, neither on the sabbath day: [21] For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be. MATTHEW 24: 14, 20-21. Daniel Wrote 500 years before Jesus: [1] And there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation even to that same time: and at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book. [2] And many of them that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt. ... John's Vision: [2] ... Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and is become the habitation of devils,.... [8] Therefore shall her plagues come in one day, death, and mourning, and famine; and she shall be utterly burned with fire: for strong is the Lord God who judgeth her.... REVELATION 18:2, 8.

Oh well. He is 57 years old and that girl is only 22! Whose the predator? What in the H3ll is wrong with him. Learn how to fight back!? It's not about her being White, shoot even if she were Black, I think he would be making a mistake. Monique warned him! That young girl got his money.

True. So then, I guess that's why 'The Magnificent Seven' would not make the list. I thought Denzel did a good job in that movie. I did not see 'First Sunday' on the list. I loved that movie. I might be a little too ghetto, but I loved the first film Friday. I see that made the list. I see a lot of my favorites. I loved the movie Glory. I just visited a Civil War memorial and then watched that film recently. I also loved Black Hawk Down and Hotel Rwanda.

I hope that you are right! idk. I'm pessimistic and think that this issue will be a great devastation. This is a serious offense against the human 'race'! OMG!!! Honestly, I believed that this was the plan hatched at the time of the 911 attacks and before former President Obama became president. I believe that is why he did not support Reparations but instead became the decoy so that this American government could do the opposite. I believe that the National Guards are sent in to attack the homeless and define them as criminals. They've already mowed down 75 homeless sites! Where are these people going to go? Non-Black people are going to be hurt too, but this will hurt many African Americans. This is human sacrifice. Black Americans need to say that we are descendants of Slave Children and not merely DOS. This government enslaved millions of little African children and we are the product of that today. Now, they want to say that African Americans are a problem, homeless, jobless as if it's are fault completely. This is why the Bible refers to many as 'the CHILDREN OF ISRAEL'. It's not that we are specifically 'children' but due to deliberate acts of stealing children and hundreds of years of deprivation, as adults, we are in essence 'children' and lack proper knowledge of how the government has exploited us. Look, I graduated from a Black college! I graduated from an HBCU and did not even know about 'the Eyes on the Prize' film until I went to the public library and browsed. Alot of history about the Civil Rights Movement is not part of the American curriculum. Many countries in other parts of the world know much more about us over here that we do! Not only will Black males be destitute being forced out of homeless shelters, but so will many Black mothers. So, what about the children? Are they going to round up the homeless now, and force them into Florida Alcatraz or some other concentration camp? idk this sounds pretty bad.

@Mel Hopkins You are so beautiful inside and out! You bring so much positive energy to this community and to the world!

It has everything to do with present day humans. Well what about angels? What do they look like? Color was not created at the time humans appeared on earth but was part of this earth long before modern humans arrived. No. The pale gene has nothing to do with 'the gene that causes White skin'. Albinism is a recessive trait and a mutation, but the genes that causes White skin functions completely different from the gene that causes albinism. Although this short video does not explain the genetic basis, it is a great film to better understand how the gene that produces healthy light skin or white skin functions. This film is about people of African descent; Beautiful South Africans who many express this form of reproduction and genetic trait. Even though this film explains the phenotype and how light skin occurs without a genetic explanation, however, it may help to understand. But, there is a lot more about how healthy white skin happens.

What is so ironic about this term!? Anyway, the problem with this belief would be that it is obviously used by White Supremacist but, they themselves have 'black blood' showing that the one drop rule is a distortion. In reality, humans are NOT defined based on whether or not we express dark skin as being a primary factor or we are not defined based on whether or not we have a little black blood due to an African ancestor. Skin color is one of several other major physical characteristic that is a factor in how certain ethnic cultures of people are defined. But by itself, skin color means nothing in how a person is defined. For example, Solomon was very black skinned and he described himself as being a twin to the Black virgin. But Solomon's racial identity would not be 'a Black man', however, he was an Israelite man. He was an Israelite of the tribe of Judah. And then there is Solomon's father, David. David was described as being 'a Ruddy man'. So how can David's racial identity be that he was 'of the Brown Race' or 'of the Red Race' and his son be a completely different 'Race' and of the Black Race? So, skin color is a physical characteristic not a defining factor of 'the Human Race'. Today, the Black Race could mean African Americans, or Nigerians, or Ghanians, or Jamaicans, or Haitians, or South Sudanese, or maybe a kind of people in India, etc. But maybe in ancient times, the word 'KEMET' may define African people and one physical characteristic of Kemet people was their dark skin or black skin and another physical trait would be thick hair and a people who formed cultures along the Nile River, etc. But however, an ancient Assyrian would not be defined as Kemet. Even if an Assyrian had dark or swarthy skin complexion, they would not be Kemet. And furthermore, a dark skinned Assyrian would not even be considered as 'a Syrian'! An Assyrian or White Syrian was a people that formed a distinct ethnic cultural identity in a geographical region apart from the Syrians. So even if a Syrian was very light skinned, that person would be from a unique culture and not an Assyrian at all, even though, they had a common origin at an earlier time period. Likewise, many Europeans today, express blue eyes, and therefore, they definitely have a little black blood! You can't have blue eyes with any other pigment but Eumelanin, meaning black pigment. However, they are not of the Black Race. Today, Europeans or White people with blonde hair and blue eyes are of the White Race. They are not considered to be Black just because they have a little black blood. But today, people today are categorized differently and what a confusion!

No.... Irish Poles Jews and Italians were not always considered members of the White race...yet their skin was white Whilst people from Iran Lebanon and Egypt or MENA Descent were consider members of the White race....yet the vast majority of whose skin is brown. "No.... Irish Poles Jews and Italians were not always considered members of the White race...yet their skin was white Whilst people from Iran Lebanon and Egypt or MENA Descent were consider members of the White race....yet the vast majority of whose skin is brown." Going back to try and respond to some earlier comments; Whether 'Irish Poles Jews, and Italians' have white skin or not, nevertheless, it would be their genetic origins and not only their phenotype that define their physical identity. Likewise, whether 'Iranian, Lebanese, Egyptian or of MENA descent, it would not be because these people tend to have brown skin that define them completely, even if they regard themselves to be of the White race. As you have mentioned, that would be 'a social construct' and they would be recognized as such to be distinguished from their earlier origins and specifically to be distinguished from their earlier 'African and Black origins'. So even though these people have white or brown skin, no matter, their genes express a commonality that also is vital in understanding how they are defined. They are defined based on cultural practices and other shared factors that show up as 'gene flow' as genes tend to travel in pairs. Therefore, because none of these ethnic cultural peoples mention express 'a complete white color' but a blending, their being defined as 'the White Race' is relative. By the time that they have erased the dominant African traits through sex selection, it would be acceptable to regard them as being of the White race, even if they have brown skin along with other traits such as straight type hair. But that does not mean that it would be scientifically accurate, nevertheless, it would be a governmental category and a social construct. So if European Jews are referred to as being 'of the White Race', or 'European', nonetheless, it still would not erase the presence of their origins and the presence of the Original Jews, and more importantly, their governmental White-ethnic identity would not erase the written description and the historical definition of 'the Original Jews' dominant genetic identity. The ancient scriptures define the identity of the Original Jews to have the dominant genetic expression and phenotype of having woolly hair and that is redundant throughout the scriptures. And as I explained earlier, that absolutely does NOT mean that all Jews must have nappy hair, but that this would be a major phenotype expressed for many of the Original Jews because the beginning of their ethnic and cultural identity is based on them living in Africa for four hundred years and intermixing with African people. So, when it comes to this modern world and the many European Jews, well, if they say that their origins stem from the Original Jews, then why would that be wrong if their genes still reveal this origin? If their phenotype shows that they look like the White Race or European, then it would obviously mean that they intermixed with Europeans for a long time, but their genes may still reveal something else. The bottom line though, would be that all modern mankind have genetic material that will show that one aspect of their genetic origins stem one Black African male. But then, the practice of sex selection for the purpose of White Supremacy yields other deep truths and reveals that at one time, modern humans intermixed with Primitive humans. And when sex selection is practiced to the point that certain kinds of mutations occurs, then, another major scientific genetic issue arises! If mutation occurs to the point that the dominant gene expression of African traits are completely gone, then that human is NOT defined as being 'of the Black Race'. In other words, a human with straight hair who continues to reproduce for the purpose of erasing the trait of nappy hair can cause a mutation to occur, and not only erase that trait but break other genetic bonds as genes travel in pairs. Therefore, other 'African traits' or dominant traits of Africans also go through a mutation, and so these traits can never be reversed for that individual. So based on the culture that forms, they would be defined based on a shared gene pool. Because the gene material of the Primitive humans is not abundant and there are NO anatomically straight Y-DNA primitive males, then, there is no such existence of a Primitive inter-racial culture of humans. However, there is much more to this though. So for now, to say that Polish people or Poles are of the White race today, does not mean that they did not have Black African origins. To say that Irish people are of the White race today, does not mean that they did not have Black African origins. One key factor about the Poles and their ancient historical origins would be based on geography. In the ancient Byzantine world, and long before that time even, the dominant name in that region for an ancient people was names like 'Pul', and 'Arpad', etc. But before the Greeks, the names were 'Black names' like 'Pul' and 'Pelops', [i.e. Peloponnese].

Yes! Awesome! The description of Jesus Christ by the prophets all correlate, and what is so fascinating for me would be that every word written down seems to be a confirmation. I can see where the 'burnt brass' could mean that Jesus may have looked black or black/brown, or bronze! Years ago, I did extensive research on ancient metal works of brass and bronze and iron, etc. I was so amazed at how, after hundreds of years, the earlier Bronze Age used the element 'nickel' to make bronze. But then the second Bronze Age came about due to a newfound technique and the use of 'tin', [If I remember correctly] became used. I was so surprised to learn that brass was a mixture of bronze and another metal and for this reason, brass was much darker than copper. So the Copper Age was overshadowed by the Second Bronze Age and many of the idols of the Egyptians did look black!!! It looked like black metal! I apologize for not coming back sooner, but my family is stressing me out recently!

I believe by getting a better understanding about genes will help to diminish the negative bias in all categories you mentioned. For example, when the phenotype is regarded in terms of skin color, therefore, it would help to understand gene expression and how 'a blending affect' occurs. But when the origin of skin color is acknowledged in terms of the first modern male, this kind of truth would completely shed light on the truth and expose a lot of negativity that came about.

The entire book of Zechariah is based on the color of the horses in correlation to Colorism and racism. Social injustice based on Colorism. His entire book was based on the Bay or 'red' horse, the Black horse, the Grisled horse, the white horse, etc. Colorism and White Supremacy. Again, the genetic basis of the Bay horses correlates to the Original Sin. To add a little more about 'the Bay horse'; The Bay horse is 'a red horse' but it is due to a specific gene known as 'the agouti gene'. Otherwise, the original horse, the Bay horse is a black horse. Due to this agouti gene, the bay horse may be in phenotype, may look like a black horse, brown horse, grisled (white or gray) horse, or a beige horse, etc. But its origin is that it was a black horse. The prophet Zechariah writes about 'the Bay Horse' and the pure Black horse and the pure White horse to address the issue of Colorism in the human world. Like it was later revealed, the watered down Jews, murdered Zechariah for this prophecy. Also, I need to make a correction because I earlier wrote about Zechariah and then realized that I had forgotten when he actually lived. He lived long after the overthrow. Zechariah lived 70 years after the overthrow and at the time that the Second Temple was being built during the Persian Empire times.

Okay. I just popped in. Hope to get back to this discussion real soon.

But, my question would be; Who is innocent? Logical thinking? My question would be from what relative basis do we think logically about certain catastrophes happening in the earth? Yes. I think so. Again, this goes back to what I mentioned earlier, in that the Supreme Being did not cause problems anyway, so therefore, many circumstances are due to mankind. So whether it is the people in the Middle East today, in Israel, or the Iranians, or the Palestinians, or the Arabs, or the Americans who are said to be giving aid, these events are made byway of mankind. Logically, some may believe when innocent little children are hurt, that God has something to do with it, but no, He is not doing this. And if natural disasters happen, some may believe that it is divine intervention and the Bible does mention this kind of act many times, however, it is difficult to make logical sense, to some regards. Why would God destroy the Egyptians in the Exodus and then a few hundred years later, the Jews are forced back into brutal captivity again? Why would ancient Rome thrive for hundreds of years and then collapse and then form a massive empire again built on human slavery? Some may think that the Supreme Being did not do anything to bring about the collapse of ancient Rome and that it was just an act of nature that was soon bound to happen, while others may believe the Bible in that God did bring down ancient Rome. Some of us may believe that it is just nature while some of us may believe that it was prophecy come to light, but for now, humanity continues and humans still exist. I believe that the Redemption Plan is still unfolding. I believe that at times, the Supreme Being does intervene with acts of nature. I do not understand a lot, but through study, there are some prophecies that I can see was right on target such as the prophecy of the Transatlantic Slave Ship Trade. Another prophecy that is now old history would be when the prophet Daniel wrote about the Black Death Plague. Daniel lived during the 500s BC. He wrote that the Messiah would come after the Second Temple was bullt. He wrote that the Roman Empire would form, be destroyed and then reform. ... He wrote that in AD 1335, the Black Death Plague would come and it did, right on target, that very year. So, thousands of years after Daniel wrote and published his book, these events did occur and is now old news. And so, there are many more prophecies that have not been set to occur yet, and this may cause some people to not believe that the Supreme Being has anything to do with it, but in some way, he does make intervention to help humanity. However, He is not the one hurting innocent people. The Bible reveals that the Creator will address innocent victims of crime, even though it may seem hard to believe, nevertheless, He does address that issue.

Okay. I just popped in briefly today. But I will hope to get back into this discussion as soon as I can. not so. But I will get back with some references to show that I do not believe this to be true. The genetics of Denisovans so not have the same origin as do the homo sapiens at all. lol. I have a degree in Biology! It does not matter about the species whether human or horses. The pigment is the same!!! Eumelanin is the same whether in humans, horses, cats, etc. It is the very same!!! I am NOT addressing the issue of breed or whether human or animal, I am addressing the genetics of the pigment 'eumelanin'. period. BLACK pigment is the same! Phaeomelanin is the same in all kinds of animals. As a victim of racism, this subject is my passion. So my desire to address it would be in hopes dispelling deliberate lies to hurt people and then to bring about peace.

The Genetics of the Bay Horse Bay is a hair coat color of horses, characterized by a reddish-brown or brown body color with a black point coloration on the mane, tail, ear edges, and lower legs. Bay is one of the most common coat colors in many horse breeds. ... The black areas of a bay horse's hair coat are called "black points", and without them, a horse is not a bay horse. ... Bay horses have black skin and dark eyes, except for the skin under markings, which is pink. Skin color can help an observer distinguish between a bay horse with white markings and a horse which resembles bay but is not. ... …Therefore, "brown" can be an ambiguous term for describing horse coat color. It is clearer to refer to dark-colored horses as dark bays or liver chestnuts. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bay_(horse) Dark bay/ black bay By Montanabw - Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, Purebred Arabian stallion Maclintock V (Desperado V x Marigold V) A very dark bay horse might appear to be almost black Country Berry Bay Horse https://www.pinterest.com/pin/2111131052534029/ A Dapple [Grisled/Speckled] Bay Horse https://horserookie.com/dapples-on-a-horse/ Dapple [Grisled] Horse https://www.pinterest.com/pin/AYYU2Z76hKIsv7nB-VrUV8dNJKBnztKTayvcdqCkFXP4VgyIBNqr7ho/