Chevdove

I gotta tell you, I am a little indifferent about this issue. I do not believe that down playing light skinned African Americans is the right thing to do altogether. I believe that we should highlight dark skinned AfroAmerican celebrities more and more, but we should never suppress lighter skinned ones at all. I don't think that we should give into that kind of programming at all. There have been so many times that, had it not have been for lighter skinned AfroAmericans that stood against racism, I would not be here today. We don't need to push down one group to highlight another. Let us do both at the same time. Let's work together. However, when it comes to racism and perhaps certain venues, then yes, it may be a good choice to select a darker skinned person for a specific cause. If a lighter skinned Sista is more brilliant than a darker one, may the best one be elevated, and not based on skin color, but how that person shines in all of her features. If a light skinned Brother is better than a darker one, well, they are both 'Black men' and may the best one be put forth to represent our cause. But yes, when it comes to representation as a whole, the percentage of light skinned versus darker skinned needs to be addressed. Something is wrong, if we are seeing more light skinned than dark skinned people being elevated. But many times, dark skinned people hide their issues with Colorism within and that can be just as bad or even worse. For example, some of the celebrities that you even posted have married White people and so, wouldn't that be counter productive in defining our 'race' without the issue of White Supremacy? And what about the Black beauties that have gotten older and show no sign of getting married and having children. How does that ideal promote our culture? You know, I think education is a major key in the improvement of our existence. I think blonde hair is a beauty trait, but many of us have no idea of its origin. I think that we have been made to think it is a White trait and therefore obsess over it, but education is key. IMO, to see someone, Black or dark skinned with blonde hair, or grey hair, or White hair, meaning, light colored hair, might be a huge compliment in how they look. So it's not that it is negative, but it is how we have been made to think that it is a White trait.

I agree, it's going to take a long time to undo. And I applaud all of the efforts too, that have been made to this goal. But here is an observation that I see no matter how I try to ignore it; it seems that everything positive that has occurred, there has been a sneaky underlying effort to mock us and attack us, bit by bit and then change and reverse the effort and mostly; downgrade it to a ridiculous event that may not be recognized right away. Let me give you an example of what I mean. In your first comment you said: And so, no matter how I try to ignore my intuitions and no matter how I try to make myself believe that I am reading to much into it, I still have this lingering thought. The word that you used 'pride' has been systematically exploited, in my opinion, and this is not a light matter. This 'Black Pride Movement' occurred a few decades ago, and now look!!! This world has been used to promote a global movement among people of African descent and then made to be associated with the entire western and European world!!! Now, the term 'PRIDE' has been attached to a flag, globally. So now, no matter what, when I think of 'Black Pride' I immediately think about the 1960s and today's Homosexual Movement simultaneously. This government took the late Jesse Jackson's movement and merged it with the Homosexual Movement. No, this was not a coincidence, IMO, this was deliberate. Do I have a problem with this Homosexual Movement headed up by Barack Obama? No I do not. But I do have a problem with Black Americans not dealing with the origins of it and in how it was put upon us during Chattel Slavery times. We are the product of rape here in America. Why is this not being addressed?

The Western World has confused many, however, like the very scripture and book that you are referencing, the prophet Daniel wrote that, due to the Black civilizations obsessing over White Idolatry, the Creator gave us over to White domination for 'a time, times and a half of times'. Therefore, it is the White empire governments today that have the chance to either correct sin or ignore it. When they set up on the backs of Black-on-Black Hatred and allow this type of violence to go unchecked, they will be judged for it completely. Likewise, the Creator will not allow, me, a Black woman to correct the priesthood ultimately, however, it will have to be other Black men. Like Jesus said, because he came, Black men would be persecuted no matter if you believe in him or not. Black kings turned their backs on their own governments, their women and their children, and pat each other on the back and allowed abuse to occur and so, White Domination took over. And so, today, many of us are dealing captivity right now, until we get it right. We all have to agree ultimate and that will probably take a thousand years in order to achieve that goal. God will judge the Church first according to scripture and so, due to the July 4th, and the Separation of Church and State, well, a lot of White Christians will need to come forth and fight for truth when it comes to White Supremacy and Colorism. And one of their most insane issues would be their idols that they have erected all over the world of 'the Messiah' in White face and then telling and preaching that it doesn't matter what color Jesus is in reality. That is their ultimate blasphemy. Truth is universal, no matter what color we are. We are all one in Christ. This scripture, 'we are all one in Christ' I believe, has been mis-interpreted to be incorrectly thought of as 'we are all one human race'. That is a confusion. But after Jesus came the first time and had nothing to do with the Romans and their government because of their being Separatist, well, many Gentiles came to the light and fought for the Church to be established during the time of the First Roman Empire. But due to White Supremacy, many of us have been confused. Nevertheless, as I have said, in the New Testament, the phrase 'Son of Man' refers to Jesus Christ. As you have written in connection with Adam, 'Son of Man' means 'a descendant of Adam'and so, yes, Ezekiel did also reference himself on this wise. However, again, as i have said, in the New Testament reference I shared, it referred to 'Jesus Christ'. That would be the exact same prophecy that Jesus gave some 500 years later after Daniel wrote it. This refers to Jesus, himself as being 'the Son of Man' coming with clouds, etc. after the Tribulation era. Anyway, here are some references. I tried to find a youtube Short video of an African American preacher. The second video reference is a little long, but he's an African American preacher and I am listening to him now and so far he is doing an awesome job. So anyway, here are three (3) references for this topic. The 'Son of Man' refers to Jesus Christ, and 'the Ancient of Days' refers to the Creator, God Almighty: AI Overview In Daniel 7, the Ancient of Days (God the Father) is the eternal Judge sitting on a fiery throne, while the "one like a Son of Man" (Jesus Christ) is a heavenly figure arriving on clouds to receive everlasting dominion and authority. It depicts a divine transfer of power from the chaotic earthly beast kingdoms to an eternal, heavenly kingdom ***** Daniel Prophesies the Son of Man | Daniel 7:9-14 ***** Just Teach Ministries **** This video will not embed **** https://youtu.be/btWeweQtrNk

My stating 'blood red' has nothing to do with white people. The earth is 'black' no matter what other minerals or colors are in it in certain regions. When the astronauts step on the moon, they were amazed do to this very reason. The entire earth's crust is black and certain mineral deposits like iron in some regions show a presence of other colors such as 'blood red'. You continue to try and insert white supremacy into black communities and this is what I am referring to about the prophecy of the Bay and Grisled Horse. Black people of African descent do not need that kind of confusion. All script goes back to one origin and can be confirmed with the earth or the sky; astronomy. The letter 'Y' was added thousands of years later and replaced 'the letter J'in some ancient script and based on dates and times of ancient script, all words go back to a specific time period and when they were used in script. The 'letter Y' would be a replacement letter and must be regarded in context of the words they are used. For example; Asshur Shem was born under a specific date but later descendants may be scripted as being 'Shurians', 'the land of Shur', 'Syrians', 'Asshur', or 'Assyrians', etc. and they each have a specific meaning.

You will find no proof of that no proof Because this American government formed on the basis of enslaving millions of little African children and then lying, we must prove certain ancient histories with confirmations. There is no proof of boats that could sail across the oceans 8000 years ago.

I am in shock at what is going on! I worry that in the near future, we as Americans might end up in a vulnerable situation with others that are foreign and in need of help and because of what is happening now, I wonder what the outcome will be. Just recently in November 2025, EBT was cut and also, the Housing Authority programs have changed and so, I keep wondering about single Black mothers and how they are dealing with these new laws. Have you notice the silence on that issue too? I think Americans are kind of, in shock and it is not that we are quiet about what is going on in Iran or Mexico, but we are in shock. It would be a good thing to trust in our government and in that this system is working to help and protect and provide for its citizens, but on the other hand, a lot of aid has just been cut, the government shut down back in September and then the ICE movements seems to become more and more obvious that we need to be mindful of how our government is acting within our borders too. I am happy that we have law enforcement though, to deal with the violence that goes on in our system, however, are we really getting the help? It seems to me that when it comes to Black-on-Black crime, well, very little effort from our government intervenes.

@Pioneer1 Okay. I gotcha. Lol. I guess the most important input from me would be that, when it comes to ancient script, whether it is from ancient Egyptian records, ancient Sumerian, ancient Chinese, ... the Linear B script, Ugarit, etc. all of it must be confirmed with science. What mean is that certain words are 'anchors' and must be confirmed with the planet earth and also 'the sky'. For this reason, it doesn't matter whether the words are translated from cuneiform script, Arabic script, Egyptian hieroglyphs, etc., all translations go back to some origin. so then, when it comes to terms like 'Son of Man' or 'Adam', the meanings have an origin but over time, the meaning may vary so therefore, you need to look at 'the context' of the whole sentence or phrase, or subject. I can absolutely agree in that 'Son of Man' would correlate to the word 'Adam' however, both of these terms carry a huge volume of other meanings and must be understood based on the context. The name 'Adam' is defined in the Bible [KJV] for meaning, I think, 'servant of God' [I can't remember for sure]. However, this name carries a whole lot of other word origins and meanings too. In most modern translations, for example, the ancient letter 'h' has been omitted from so many ancient words and this is insanely crucial to understand the significance in the past as opposed to today. Today, that letter may not mean much, but eventually, it will probably surface again and shed much more information about how ancient mankind regarded themselves in terms of being 'a spiritual being' as well as a physical being. The ancient word 'Adam' in some text would have been written as 'Adham' or 'Ahdama' or 'Adamah', and etc. The Biblical name of Seth, the third son of Adam and Chevah [Eve] is also spelled 'Sheth' in the Bible. The name 'Japheth' is sometimes spelled 'Yapheth'. Shem is sometimes spelled 'Sem' and Ham is sometimes spelled 'Cham', etc. But in the Cuneiform script or the Egyptian hieroglyph script, I have no idea how it was translated to Arabic script and the letter 'h' was represented in those scripts. For this reason, scholars who translate ancient script would apply ancient script to the earth and some form of scientific confirmation. So then, the name 'Adam' would also be defined not only as meaning 'Son of Man' or 'Servant of God' but, it would also be defined more complete as meaning 'blood red' in association to the science of 'color' and to the planet earth, as Adam was created from 'the dust of the earth' so says the Bible. The name 'Cham' would also be defined in association to 'Kemet' or 'Khem' or 'Cham' in association to 'black earth' in the region of Kemet in the land of Egypt and Northeast Africa. The name 'Seth' would also be defined in association to 'Ra' or 'the sun' and in ancient script, this name correlated to 'the South world' or 'Seth world'. The name 'Japheth' correlates to the word 'Ja-Petah' or 'Ptah' and 'Egypetah', 'Gupta', etc. and also correlated to 'black earth' or Egypt. The name 'Shem' correlated to 'Sem priest' or 'Second born of the priesthood' and also 'Semet' and as a descendant of Seth, like the name 'Japheth' it was actually a title and not the personal name of the Biblical sons of Noah. The personal names of the sons of Noah reveal another deeper level to who these ancient men actually defined. Like most men, their sons were named after their ancestors. So the eldest son, the high priest of Ptah, Japheth, personal or 'Seth name' was 'Kim' and for this reason, many people of the east world, past and present still have this name. You see this name 'Kim' in many people from Korea and the ancient 'Eskimos' and 'Yakima' and etc. Ancient Egypt also has this root name 'Kim' as well. The personal or 'Seth name' for the second son of Noah was how the son of David was identified as this personal went down through the ages. David's son, the Jedi [i.e. Jedidiah] was known as 'Solomon' and his name stems from the personal name of Shem which was Selah [i.e. Salah, Shelah, etc.]. Noah named Shem, after his ancestor; Methuselah and this name refers to 'Peace' or 'Peacemaker'. The youngest son of Noah, Ham, was named after his father; Lamech [i.e. Mech, reverse script Chem]. The name 'Lamech' refers to 'Mecca' or Technology and Ham was defined by this name in association to being 'a Great Builder', etc. And there is another 'scientific revelation' that most Black Christian ignore; All three of the sons were actually identical!!! This would be a huge genetic factor that today's scholar know well, but due to White Supremacy, this is kept secret. Even today, the highest rate of identical twins are from Yoruba, and this would be due to the genetics of the Original Adamah of Kemet!!! So then, all three sons of Noah [i.e. Canoe, Noe, etc.] had Seth names, Kim, Salah, and Lamech. But the time lines shows that they were born in captivity and therefore, they identified by a 'Ca name' such as 'Canoe' as well. Personally, I think that Noah's Seth name was 'Imhotep' because of the exact match in the timelines. However, I have as yet to find a confirmation from anyone else!!! Imhotep build the Great Steppe Pyramid during the time of pharaoh Djoser and that was the exact time that Noah would have been living in Egypt! How else did Noah know how to construct a massive vessel, if he had not been living in Egypt!? Imhotep was the high priest of Djoser and that is exactly what Noah was as well. He was the Most high priest of the living God and he was a master lecturer. He had to have learned those skills in Egypt and he had to have been a master of working with wood and therefore knew how to used 'Cedar wood' [i.e. Gopher wood; Copher wood Coffin wood] or some type of rot resistant wood to construct the massive vessel. So, this name 'Adam' and the phrase 'Son of Man' has to be regarded in context of whatever script or passage that uses it. The term 'Son of Man' refers to 'Jesus Christ' in the New Testament: [3] And as he sat upon the mount of Olives, the disciples came unto him privately, saying, Tell us, when shall these things be? and what shall be the sign of thy coming, and of the end of the world? [4] And Jesus answered and said unto them, Take heed that no man deceive you. [5] For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many. [6] And ye shall hear of wars and rumours of wars: see that ye be not troubled: for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet. [29] Immediately after the tribulation of those days shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken: [30] And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory. ST MATTHEW 24:3- 6, and, 24: 29-30. So, the 'Sign' refers to astronomical date that Biblical Jesus was born of which was scientifically marked byway of an astronomical wonder; the advent of a new star that moved into our solar system. The 'Sign of the Son of Man' means 'the Star of Bethlehem' that Moving Star that came into our Solar System on April 17 about 2000 years ago. So this scripture refers to a prophecy of what has been prophesied to happen immediately after the Tribulation Period. And due to the atmosphere being affected by what some scholars believe will be some type of Ice Age existence due to a Volcanic Winter, the earth will experience some type of climate or heavy cloud coverage that will block the sun for a long time. But when the atmosphere changes and the stars become visible again, then, the planets will be seen again and so, this particular 'Moving star' will move to be near the moon and it will be a sign that the Tribulation Period will come to an end. And so, a long time ago, the ancient Africans and American Indians knew how to look at the stars, planets, etc. and read the skies and could predict certain events, but today, most of us Black folks have been dumbed down and have no clue how to read the skies. All in all, the phrase 'Son of Man' in the New Testament refers to a descendant Adam and Eve, of which would be Jesus Christ, therefore, it makes a whole lot of sense that the term 'Son of Man' would mean 'Adam' but again, a deeper meaning must be understood and todays 'White Jews' or Hebrew translations do not go that deep. Black people need to understand that the ancient scriptures have been misinterpreted and a lot of what we are getting is part-truths; Blasphemy. I've seen this too. A lot of American Indians in the Northwest regions of America are identified by that word; Ishy or something like that. So I understand this version of humans with this name 'Ishtar', 'Isis', 'Israel', 'Ishmael', etc. Also, the words and names like 'Island', 'Isthmus', 'Sus' as in 'Jesus', 'Susquehanna', 'Susan', 'Shushan', Mississippi', etc. refer to 'water'. The root term in correlation with the planet earth defines mankind as being in connection to 'water'. Humans are most made up of 90% water, I think that is what scientist report.

I have been referencing the use of sails early, but you've been overlooking it because you may not understand the obvious significance in sail technology as proof the earth did not split until very recent in the history of this planet. Thank you. All timelines can be confirmed due to astronomy. It does not matter what anyone believes when it comes to astronomy and the dating of historical events. The Biblical timeline is exact and confirms ancient Egyptian records, ancient Greek records, ancient Chinese records, etc. All mound civilizations are dated to begin in the 3000s B.C. The western world governments changed dates and times around the set up of their Colonial empire and today, this is easy to recognize due to such things as the printing press.

Well where did he go!? He came in the spotlight for a quick minute and then, it seems to me he disappeared just as quickly as he came! Anyway, I loved his style.

I heard the president saying that our gas prices were going to go up and that we depend on 20% of oil coming through the gulf of Hormuz but, how can anyone of us on the bottom of the pyramid believe that the government is telling us all truth?

No I don't see any thing in history that dates boats that long ago with sails, though, and that would be a key point. Don't you think? Ancient script does not say that, but it is an interesting thought! The date of the flood was exactly 2356 B.C., April 17 and then, the first time the earth split resulting in Archipelagos was a couple hundreds of years later. So, I can see one affecting the other. hmh. Interesting point!

Now, they are saying negative things about his son, the elected leader. I just can't believe what is happening! Wow! I do not understand politics on this level. However, coming to this forum is what I look forward to doing to help me understand better.

I was deliberating whether or not to put a 'laughing emoji' or a 'heart emoji' because this post evoked two simultaneous emotions for me. Yeah. Me too. The clouds blocked it completely where I am. On this same wise though, there is supposed to be an upcoming celestial event that might be spectacular. A comet is suppose to come close to the sun in a few weeks and because of it being 'a sun grazer' though, it is difficult to know what will happen. Scientist say that it might explode or if it makes it past the sun, it might become bright enough to see.

Yes. Absolutely. This is depressing.

Okay. I agree to a point because humans did record some aspects of it, but the earth is so old and much older than human when they began to record, I understand what you are saying! Thank you! The Biblical script does pinpoint a date and time to be within a ten year time span when the earth did split; according to the Bible. However, in order to confirm, most scholars know that you need at least two or three forms of references to confirm facts. And so, other than the Biblical script, there would be the ancient Sumerians, Elamites, Egyptians and Chinese that probably recorded something, but this is difficult to obtain today!!! The lifespan of Peleg, the son of Shem is specific. His death and the time that is given when Noah died specifically reveals that the Biblical records puts the time that earth split to be within a ten year time span from the death of Noah and the death of Peleg. yes, the Biblical script is that exact. Biblical timelines are based on astronomy and that is an exact science. The western world governments can lie but they cannot lie against astronomy and how are planets are confirmed to move around the sun. I cannot remember the exact date, because, I lost my notes and need to rely on the exact timelines, but the time span recorded is between the death of Noah and the death of Peleg. And that was a ten year gap. The history of the Greek Isles is also a major source as well, to regard on this subject. The western world government reset up of their leagues after the Crusades if part of the confusion, because they deliberately debauched ancient records. They changed dates and times. They caused a lot of Greek history to be regarded as Greek mythology. There records about 'the Lost City of Atlantis' is just one example of their deliberate attempt to change historical facts.