Son & Father Charged in Georgia School Shooting

[ProfD]

https://nypost.com/2024/09/07/us-news/georgia-school-shooting-suspect-colt-grays-family-not-white-trash-are-just-regular-people-relative/

 

Most schools around America just opened a couple weeks ago.

 

It didn't take long for a 14-year old white boy to show up with his AR-15 cutting down 4 people with 9 folks injured.

 

The school resource officer is being hailed as a hero for preventing more loss of life.

 

The shooter and his father are being charged with multiple counts.

 

These same individuals were interviewed by the FBI last year because something this teenager posted raised red flags. FBI let it go.

 

Meanwhile, the father proceeds to buy his troubled son a weapon of destruction and teaches him how to use it. 

 

The media ties itself in knots trying to spin away from the dysfunction, death and destruction caused by white folks.

 

It's easy to blame Black suspects and victims for whatever happens to them. Regardless of age, rhe mugshots and criminal records for everyone involved are plastered on TV immediately.

 

Yet, when white folks do dumb sh8t, the media is slow to reveal the names and faces of white assailants.

 

The media is always on code in protecting white folks who kill others until they can't. Then, they'll spill tea with somber.

 

Former POTUS OJ's VP pick and running mate JD Vance called the latest school shooting "a fact of life". Can't make this stuff up.

 

In Michigan, the son, father and mother are imprisoned for the son shooting up the school. Let's see if Georgia can make it stick too.

 

White folks do not want parents held accountable for the deeds of their children. I don't see why not especially if they were responsible for arming them in the 1st place and not getting mental health treatment to prevent the worse from happening....again.

[Troy]

A black boy was killed in GA maasacre.
 

I’m glad they are charging the father. 
 

Since they won’t go after the manufactures or the law makers maybe putting more of the parents in jail will help.

[ProfD]

4 hours ago, Troy said:

Since they won’t go after the manufactures or the law makers maybe putting more of the parents in jail will help.

It's worth a shot (no pun intended). Make them accountable for the sins of their children. 

 

Amazing that AR-15s haven't been outright banned in the US. It's not really a weapon used for animal hunting.

[Pioneer1]

I have a number of questions....
One is actual, and others are rhetorical.

1. Why would a father by his 14 year old son a MILITARY style rifle?
As the good Professor already pointed out, it's clearly not designed for hunting.
Who did his father expect for him to one day use it on if he "had" to?
....this is a rhetorical question, as I already know the answer.

2. After recent incidents involving WHITE parents buying weapons for their children.....
After asking WHY so many White parents are buying weapons for their children, then we must as why AREN'T Black parents doing the same for THEIR children?

3. There is more AfroAmerican political power in the state of Georgia than anywhere outside of the DMV area of the United States, what will the Black political power structure of Georgia do in response to this?
....I already know the answer to this one too, so this is another rhetorical question.

 

[ProfD]

Every Black media personality with a platform should be asking those very same questions every day. 

 

Force white folks to tell the truth about why they have so many guns. Wait for answer.

 

Sometimes people have to hear raw and uncut what they already know. No confusion.

[Pioneer1]

4 minutes ago, ProfD said:

Every Black media personality with a platform should be asking those very same questions every day. 

 

Force white folks to tell the truth about why they have so many guns. Wait for answer.

 

Sometimes people have to hear raw and uncut. what they already know raw and uncut. No confusion.

I like how you say "wait for the answer" NEELY FULLER JR. style!

Man, that actually WORKS!

Stay in the question lane/mode!

As soon as they answer one question, have 3 more ready for them....lol.

[ProfD]

11 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

Stay in the question lane/mode!

As soon as they answer one question, have 3 more ready for them....lol.

Yep. It works. The beauty of it is no need for argument.

 

Of course, the white folks will eventually get red-faced and hopping mad once exposed.

[Pioneer1]

4 minutes ago, ProfD said:

Yep. It works. The beauty of it is no need for argument.

 

Of course, the white folks will eventually get red-faced and hopping mad once exposed.

 
HOPPING MAD!

Man, I made one so mad 6 or 7 months ago he was actually hopping and wiggling around in his chair with a red face and strings of spit stretching in his mouth!


 "What is this....a fucking inquisition???"

 

[ProfD]

1 hour ago, Pioneer1 said:

 HOPPING MAD!

Man, I made one so mad 6 or 7 months ago he was actually hopping and wiggling around in his chair with a red face and strings of spit stretching in his mouth!


 "What is this....a fucking inquisition???"

Yep. They would be fire-breathers if they could muster methane.

 

People like that guy are only mad because white privilege has them believing they're not supposed to answer questions from *others*.

[Chevdove]

On 9/7/2024 at 10:04 AM, ProfD said:

White folks do not want parents held accountable for the deeds of their children. I don't see why not especially if they were responsible for arming them in the 1st place and not getting mental health treatment to prevent the worse from happening....again.

 

The father said that he went as far as 10th grade and then he earned a GED. I wonder what kind of job did he do?

 

 

[ProfD]

10 hours ago, Chevdove said:

The father said that he went as far as 10th grade and then he earned a GED. I wonder what kind of job did he do?

Education doesn't really matter for them when it comes to jobs.  

 

The only limitation in their ability to succeed is their level of ambition in attaining it.

[Pioneer1]

9 hours ago, ProfD said:

Education doesn't really matter for them when it comes to jobs.  

 

The only limitation in their ability to succeed is their level of ambition in attaining it.

MAN you said that so eloquently as I was thinking the very same thing but wasn't sure how to put it so I just didn't respond.

How many White men didn't even graduate from highschool but were able to get "hooked up" on jobs where they made enough money to support themselves, buy property, and support families!

 

I also like how Neely Fuller Jr. from time to time mentions how the racists also enjoy the privilege of "Mysterious Sources Of Income".
....another one of those things I noticed about White folks that others didn't seem to notice, but Mr.Fuller did...and pointed it out.

How seemingly poor White folks with only one job that pays minimum wage seem to be able to maintain a house,  a car, children, and even feed the damn dog....as well as maintain a drinking or drug addiction....with that ONE low paying job.
They're obviously getting money from "somewhere else" besides just that job, but we don't know where it's coming from.

You got a $300 a day drug habit, but somehow can hold down a job and pay a $1500 a month mortgage on a house....working at Home Depot?
 

[ProfD]

7 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

How many White men didn't even graduate from highschool but were able to get "hooked up" on jobs...

 

I also like how Neely Fuller Jr. from time to time mentions how the racists also enjoy the privilege of "Mysterious Sources Of Income".

How seemingly poor White folks with 
They're obviously getting money from "somewhere else" besides just that job, but we don't know where it's coming from.

I'm sure you've heard the phrase goodies, guarantees and giveaways.

 

An uneducated, moonshine drinking white man from the hills of West Virginia can shave, shower and put on clean clothes and apply and interview for a job. He'll be hired on the spot. In less than 90 days on the job, he will be the supervisor over non-white people.

 

White folks aren't jumping through the same hoops to get loans. They're allowed to pay bills back whenever they feel like it or not.

 

Same goes for filing bankruptcy.  White folks have mastered running up a ton of debt and deciding not to pay it. They'll file bankruptcy and start all over again.

 

There's definitely a multi-tiered system in effect especially when it comes to money.

[Pioneer1]

10 hours ago, ProfD said:

I'm sure you've heard the phrase goodies, guarantees and giveaways.

 

An uneducated, moonshine drinking white man from the hills of West Virginia can shave, shower and put on clean clothes and apply and interview for a job. He'll be hired on the spot. In less than 90 days on the job, he will be the supervisor over non-white people.

 

White folks aren't jumping through the same hoops to get loans. They're allowed to pay bills back whenever they feel like it or not.

 

Same goes for filing bankruptcy.  White folks have mastered running up a ton of debt and deciding not to pay it. They'll file bankruptcy and start all over again.

 

There's definitely a multi-tiered system in effect especially when it comes to money.

They also go through marital and relationship problems at a much higher rate, but their women still give them chance after chance.
When was the last time you heard White women getting on television or the internet bashing White men because of their infidelity, marrying Asian women, or being caught messing with children?

[ProfD]

4 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

When was the last time you heard White women getting on television or the internet bashing White men because of their infidelity, marrying Asian women, or being caught messing with children?

Those women have been on code for generations.

 

Despite the feminist movement and being allowed to enter the workforce equally, white women don't buck in public.

 

Women of other races and cultures might be giving their dude the business behind closed doors but when they come outside, everyone is smiling even in divorce court.  

 

Trash TV (Jerry Springer type shows) was the most you were going to see women out of pocket. Even that is for the sake of entertainment.

[Pioneer1]

ProfD

I have to really wonder, are they really "on code" or is that their nature anyway?

In other words......
 

Are White women secretly TAUGHT and TRAINED to be so publicly submissive and docile to their men?
 

Or is it in the nature of most of them to be like that and we see it so much that we PRESUME they must have been taught to act like that because we can't believe women would naturally be so passive and docile to their men, especially as compared to how our sistaz are to us, lol.

 

 

I go to places and sit down and just STUDY people from time to time....of all races.
There are similarities but there are also strong differences in behavior.
It's not imaginary...there is definitely a pattern of differences that I see between women of different races.
 

[ProfD]

2 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

There are similarities but there are also strong differences in behavior.
It's not imaginary...there is definitely a pattern of differences that I see between women of different races.

Overall, I believe women of all races want to love their men. Certain conditions and circumstances make it harder for them.

 

Even sistas know how to be ladies in public and go upside a dude's head behind closed doors. 

[Pioneer1]

Like Neely Fuller Jr. said...

All over the world you have women of color on boats and rafts with babies in their arms, floating across great bodies of water trying to get away from "their men" and the foolish behavior of "their men"...with one thing on their minds:

 

"Which way did the White people go?"
 

"I KNOW it's some White folks somewhere around here.
If we keep sailing...we'll run into them and THEY will feed us and maybe even take us back home, give us jobs, a place to stay, and some money.
Where they at???"

 

[ProfD]

25 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

Like Neely Fuller Jr. said...

All over the world you have women of color on boats and rafts with babies in their arms, floating across great bodies of water trying to get away from "their men" and the foolish behavior of "their men"...with one thing on their minds:

That begs the question of why are the women procreating with foolish men and bringing another person into a life of suffering. 

[Pioneer1]

16 minutes ago, ProfD said:

That begs the question of why are the women procreating with foolish men and bringing another person into a life of suffering. 

Excellent question!
However you have to....like I had to...understand the MENTALITY of a lot of these women and the cultural background many of them come from.
I used to ask a lot of African and Latina women the same thing, why they sit up and have babies with these men who barely take care of them in the midst of poverty and violence.
Really, they could ask Black American and LATINA American women the same thing.....why do YALL keep sleeping with men who keep you broke and poor and abuse you and give you baby after baby?
But some of the reasons for these women in other countries are.........

1. They have no choice.
Growing up as girls and young women, the ONLY men they had access too were the men in their village or community so it was either Peter or Paul.
The urge to have sex is powerful and if there are no other men in your community, you sleep with who you got or just do without.

2. The vast majority of women outside of the Western world DO NOT believe in birth control.
Whether they are Muslim or Catholic....they believe that if they get pregnant, they are SUPPOSED to have that baby.
If you ask them why some babies are miscarried or die at birth or early in their infancy, they'll rationalize that out as something else.
So they don't believe in abortion and most of them don't believe in using condoms or have access to them.




A nice thing I notice is that among most African women....they can have a lot of babies (7 or 9) and their bodies seem to bounce back VERY quick to it's previous shape with little or no stretch marks.
And another thing....
Despite my joking around, so far I've only had sex with a handful of African women...I'm talking since  being a teenager...and all of them have had multiple children.
I can say that atleast THOSE women I've been with had coochies that were still much tighter than the American women I've been with who had only 2 or 3.

I'm not going to say that their culture "balances" itself out...but I will say that despite their seemingly illogical behavior and choices...just like in America you have pros and cons to the men in your community.

[ProfD]

13 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

However you have to....like I had to...understand the MENTALITY of a lot of these women and the cultural background many of them come from.

1. They have no choice.

The urge to have sex is powerful and if there are no other men in your community, you sleep with who you got or just do without.

Reads like no discipline or self-control. It seems selfish knowing that desire will bring another life into those conditions.

 

The reality is that human beings are sexual creatures. They're going to f8ck regardless of their situation or circumstances. 

 

The poorest people seem to procreate more than those who are well off. Rich and wealthy people have fewer offspring. 

 

Otherwise, we rationalize and put a lot of window dressing on a natural part of our existence.

 

Most humans enjoy s8x by any means necessary and regardless of their station. 

[Pioneer1]

ProfD

 

 

First of all, it's part of human nature.
I don't think it's about discipline anymore than a person should discipline themselves to not eat or drink or use the bathroom.
You can LIMIT and TRAIN yourself to do these things at certain times of the day, but you still MUST do them.

 

It's the same with sex for many if not most people.
It's a powerful urge that must be acted upon at some point.

Another thing that I didn't mention is from what I heard, much of the time it's not up to the women.
In many of these countries, the men feel it's their right to DEMAND sex from "their" women (wife or girlfriend or mistress) anytime they want.
Even if SHE doesn't want to, he in a way forces her to do it and it's ingrained in the culture.

 

 

 

The poorest people seem to procreate more than those who are well off.

 

That's because they usually have more TIME on their hands to do so than a wealthy person or person TRYING to become wealthy busy with work and school.

Also, fucking is usually FREE so it's often the entertainment of choice for those who are healthy but have no money.

[ProfD]

2 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

It's the same with sex for many if not most people.
It's a powerful urge that must be acted upon at some point.

Priests and nuns claim celibacy. 

2 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

In many of these countries, the men feel it's their right to DEMAND sex from "their" women (wife or girlfriend or mistress) anytime they want.

Sure. Different culture makes it acceptable and laws allow it. 

2 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

That's because they usually have more TIME on their hands to do so than a wealthy person or person TRYING to become wealthy busy with work and school.

True that. Focusing on other things provides a distraction. 

2 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

Also, fucking is usually FREE so it's often the entertainment of choice for those who are healthy but have no money.

Facts. It seems to be the #1 form of entertainment for poor folks and those who have little or nothing else on their mind and/or to do.

 

People with certain disabilities seem to be in a similar boat. Some of them stay horny and thirsty.

 

I'm all for people having as much s8x as they want. I just wish there was a way the universe could prevent certain people from reproducing.

 

For example, the man and woman who created this teenaged murderer should have been allowed to have tons of fun without conception.

 

Obviously, if more people were born sterile, it would reduce the world population. There's already 8 billion people walking around.

 

In fact, I believe something along those lines is coming down the pike. Population control.

 

 i think, in the future, governments will get together and through immunizations or vaccinations or by some other means, some people will be sterilized without their consent or knowledge.

[Pioneer1]

If homosexuality is natural...meaning human beings did absolutely nothing to cause it in any way and it just naturally and spontaneously occurs in all given populations; I suspect THAT would be one of Nature's forms of birth control.

[ProfD]

3 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

If homosexuality is natural...meaning human beings did absolutely nothing to cause it in any way and it just naturally and spontaneously occurs in all given populations; I suspect THAT would be one of Nature's forms of birth control.

Not really.

 

There's nothing to prevent homosexual dudes from impregnating women.

 

Same goes for lesbians getting knocked up by dudes. 

 

They could make a decision to square dance in order to reproduce and go back to their non-nproductive sex lives as LGBTQIA+.

 

However, If both the men and women have been neutered biologically, there's nothing to be produced from them having fun.

 

Think two 60+ year olds getting busy. They won't produce anything. Might end up with a health problem.

[Pioneer1]

ProfD

 

 

There's nothing to prevent homosexual dudes from impregnating women.

 

A lack of erection...lol.

I would imagine that a gay man would be about as "turned on" by a naked woman as I would be by a naked man.

If he can get an erection, especially one strong enough to screw a woman and get her pregnant....is he really homosexual?

Perhaps BI-sexual.

 

 

Same goes for lesbians getting knocked up by dudes. 

 

Now THAT is more likely to happen.
But even then, unless she's a victim of sexual assault.. if she lays up with a whole man, is she REALLY a lesbian?

 

 

Think two 60+ year olds getting busy. They won't produce anything. Might end up with a health problem

 

Don't say that. 
I'm not too far from 60 myself and I'd like to think I could still have fun...if I'm careful, lol.

When I was in my 20s, I used to ask men (if I knew them well enough) in their 40s, could they still have sex.
Now I ask men (again...whom I know well enough) in their 70s....can they still have sex.
I suspect some of them are lying about the answers they give but....lol....I guess time will tell.

[ProfD]

5 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

....is he really homosexual?

Perhaps BI-sexual.

 

.. if she lays up with a whole man, is she REALLY a lesbian?

That's why it's classified as sexual preference.

5 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said:

Don't say that. 

I'm not too far from 60 myself and I'd like to think I could still have fun...if I'm careful, lol.

Go for it. You're old enough to have as much fun as you can stand according to your cardiologist.

[Pioneer1]

16 minutes ago, ProfD said:

That's why it's classified as sexual preference.

 

 Preference or Orientation?

[ProfD]

2 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

 Preference or Orientation?

Compass or GPS.

 

Which way did they go...

 

 

Whatever it is (preference or orientation) can change to accomplish a goal i.e. children.

[Pioneer1]

I'm convinced that......
If a person is truly homosexual (not bisexual or mentally ill), their preference/orientation will NOT change.
Except for a Miracle.

What it is.....

1. When it comes to lesbian women, she has the same plumbing as any other woman so ofcourse she can have babies.
All she has to do is lay there with her legs open and let a man do his thing. 
She doesn't have to enjoy it or even get aroused, just let a man ejaculate into her and nature takes it's course.

2. When it comes to a gay man, things are a little different.
In order to get a woman pregnant, his dick has to get hard enough to enter her and ejaculate into her.
And if he's truly gay, I don't see that happening because her body wouldn't arouse him to that point.

He can masturbate and give her the semen; but the old fashioned way seems to be out of HIS lane...lol.
 

Again....if he's TRULY gay.

A lot of dudes who claim to be gay...but often have sex with women....are BI-SEXUAL but just don't know what that term means so they make up shit like "down low" out of ignorance.
 

 

[ProfD]

4 hours ago, Pioneer1 said:

I'm convinced that......
If a person is truly homosexual (not bisexual or mentally ill), their preference/orientation will NOT change.
Except for a Miracle.

You're entitled to that belief. 

 

Here's what I know as a fact....

 

A homosexual man and lesbian woman were very good friends who decided to conceive a child. This happened 40+ years ago.

 

The parents sexual orientation never changed. They didn't become a traditional family.

 

Their son didn't inherit those genes. In fact, he and his wife are having so many kids, I'm convinced they're trying to start a musical family or a sports team.

[Pioneer1]

On 9/22/2024 at 12:41 PM, ProfD said:

You're entitled to that belief. 

 

Here's what I know as a fact....

 

A homosexual man and lesbian woman were very good friends who decided to conceive a child. This happened 40+ years ago.

 

The parents sexual orientation never changed. They didn't become a traditional family.

 

Their son didn't inherit those genes. In fact, he and his wife are having so many kids, I'm convinced they're trying to start a musical family or a sports team.

A few points...........

1. Your analogy and statement supports what I just said, which is that their orientation DOES NOT change despite any type of sexual encounters they may engage in.

2. In reference to the homosexual man having a baby by a woman........
a) Were you in the room with them during the conception?  If not, we don't know for sure exactly HOW the baby was conceived.  Meaning, we aren't sure if he got an erection and inserted himself into her vagina.  There are other methods.
b) As I said before, a lot of BISEXUAL men refer to themselves or are referred to as homosexual out of ignorance.
If the man you're referring to was actually BIsexual instead of HOMOsexual, then ofcourse he could get an erection for a woman easily.

3. I'm not sure if you an inherit homosexuality any more than a person can inherit being left handed or right handed.
It could be a mechanical defect in the brain...but a natural one designed to occur from time to time.