Artificial Intelligence Continues to Amaze (and Scare) Me

[Troy]

OK so you clearly see that an AI can consumer all "the Books about Astrology Tarot Numerology, Clocks, Time, Hebrew and Greek Alphabet, and Numbers" you consumed and orders of magnitude more --without forgetting anything.  The only step you won't ascribe to AI is "intuition."

 

But what is intuition Del?  Is it anything more that the firing of neurons inside your skull?  Why can something indistinguishable, or even beyond our comprehension, be done in silicon? 

 

What did you think about the famous Alpha Go example I provided?  What would you call that unexpected move "creativity," "intuition," "genius," or something else?   

 

[Delano]

The difference which you seem to miss is that there is no copy of what I do. What I have read is available to everyone else yet Bonone does what I do. I have a few formulae for time. They aren't complicated but that doesn't mean the process is easy to replicate 

 

[Troy]

15 hours ago, Delano said:

The difference which you seem to miss is that there is no copy of what I do.

 

I get that Del. What I think you are missing is that you are also "trained" on far less information that is available to an AI.  Why is it inconceivable that an AI could not come up with the same idea or others that are far superior to yours?

[ProfD]

I don't believe AI will reach the point of salience to develop desire, ambition and initiative.

 

H8ll, we have a hard enough time programming humans to get off their azz and do something constructive and productive.

 

AI will help us with tasks and problem-solving. In advance, AI cannot see a task that needs to be performed or a problem that needs to solve.

 

I doubt that someone will wake up one day and AI has already produced whatever they had dreamed about while asleep.

[Delano]

6 hours ago, Troy said:

 

I get that Del. What I think you are missing is that you are also "trained" on far less information that is available to an AI.  Why is it inconceivable that an AI could not come up with the same idea or others that are far superior to yours?

You may be confusing data with relevant information. There is a lot Astrological data that is complete nonsense. You have to have experience and a nose to differentiate between something that is out there but possible and what is fantasy. 

 

The other major difference is that I have had experiences that AI can't replicate. My Astrology teacher's teacher taught himself Astrology and was very good at it. To the point where one of his students was well known and published. My Astrology teacher was also into Ifa. I worked with psychics full time for half a year. I met a Wizard and he told me I was a Wizard as well. Those are experiences that not many people have had and AI can never have.

 

What makes AI or an Astrologer good is their experience combined with knowledge of their craft. So until the point AI develops intuition, we are inhabiting two totally different worlds.

 

Again I would suggest to you to do a search on creating charts from words. Or magical languages that can read the subconscious mind and see the future. After you do this you will comprehend my position a bit better. Until that point you will be unmoved by my statements.