ProfD Posted December 13, 2025 Report Posted December 13, 2025 https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/us-preparing-seize-more-tankers-off-venezuelas-coast-after-first-ship-taken-2025-12-11/ First, the US was blowing up boats under the guise of narco-terrorism. This week, the US has escalated into seizing oil tankers. Clearly, the US is in the process of forcing a regime change in Venezuela. The goal is to force President Nicolas Maduro into stepping down. POTUS OJ wasn't a warmonger during his 1st term. I'm guessing he feels weakened since Russian President Vlady Putin won't stop pummeling Ukraine. POTUS OJ has found a punching bag In Venezuela. There is no real outrage or push-back among Congress nor a majority of the American people.
Pioneer1 Posted December 13, 2025 Report Posted December 13, 2025 This is just another distraction. Just like the Epstein files. Something for the mainstream media to focus on knowing damn well they aren't going to do anything regardless as to how much wrong doing has been found, instead of focusing on the REAL crimes these politicians are committing. So what if those boats were blown up or seized illegally? Then what? We know nobody is going to be thrown out of office or go to jail over it. It's just something for the media to focus the people's attention on like a soap opera...lol.
frankster Posted December 15, 2025 Report Posted December 15, 2025 No....it is not a distraction - its gun boat diplomacy. Nicholas Maduro is Hugo Chavez successor......he is trying to be fair by the local indigenous original population of Venezuela. The Colonizer's descendants now Landed Gentry and Petit Blanc is lobbying Trump successfully to remove Maduro.....They are in need of a Galvanizing Pretext. Chavez survived Bush's attempt at regime Change....Can Maduro do the same? 1
ProfD Posted December 16, 2025 Author Report Posted December 16, 2025 3 hours ago, frankster said: No....it is not a distraction - its gun boat diplomacy. Nicholas Maduro is Hugo Chavez successor...... Chavez survived Bush's attempt at regime Change....Can Maduro do the same? Right. It is all about regime change and oil and access to rare earth minerals.
Pioneer1 Posted December 16, 2025 Report Posted December 16, 2025 20 hours ago, frankster said: Chavez survived Bush's attempt at regime Change....Can Maduro do the same? ????? Chavez died and was replaced BY Maduro. How do we know Maduro wasn't at one time America's boy....like Castro?
frankster Posted December 16, 2025 Report Posted December 16, 2025 20 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said: ????? Chavez died and was replaced BY Maduro. How do we know Maduro wasn't at one time America's boy....like Castro? We dont we can only watch and wait....by their fruits shall we know
Chevdove Posted December 30, 2025 Report Posted December 30, 2025 On 12/12/2025 at 11:56 PM, ProfD said: POTUS OJ has found a punching bag In Venezuela. There is no real outrage or push-back among Congress nor a majority of the American people. Well, What about Nigeria!? I just heard that America sent missiles into Nigeria to deal with Christians being killed by Isis or some other religious group.
ProfD Posted December 30, 2025 Author Report Posted December 30, 2025 2 hours ago, Chevdove said: Well, What about Nigeria!? I just heard that America sent missiles into Nigeria to deal with Christians being killed by Isis or some other religious group. POTUS OJ claimed Isis had been defeated years ago. Now, in retaliation for those 3 servicemembers being killed a couple weeks ago, they are striking targets. No surprise the Nigerian government was in agreement with the strikes. They don't care about Christians being killed by Isis. Otherwise, they would have handled the situation themselves. Follow the money.
Pioneer1 Posted December 30, 2025 Report Posted December 30, 2025 Nigeria didn't have much of a choice BUT to go along with it. They weren't military strong enough to stop it and I doubt any other African nation would have came to their aid.
ProfD Posted December 30, 2025 Author Report Posted December 30, 2025 1 hour ago, Pioneer1 said: Nigeria didn't have much of a choice BUT to go along with it. They weren't military strong enough to stop it and I doubt any other African nation would have came to their aid. Isis is the equivalent of a gang. The Nigerian military has to out-number Isis in their country. Add in the Nigerian police. They should have been able to wipe out a handful of terrorists easily. Herein lies one of the *problems* for Black countries. When a man allows another man to fight his battles, he becomes a b8tch. These countries will never have true sovereignty as long as white folks are allowed to protect them.
Chevdove Posted Thursday at 12:33 AM Report Posted Thursday at 12:33 AM On 12/30/2025 at 8:46 AM, ProfD said: No surprise the Nigerian government was in agreement with the strikes. They don't care about Christians being killed by Isis. Otherwise, they would have handled the situation themselves. Follow the money. Oh! Okay. So why Nigeria though? Why would Trump choose to retaliate by striking this country. As you say, it's the money. On 12/30/2025 at 11:05 AM, ProfD said: These countries will never have true sovereignty as long as white folks are allowed to protect them. Truth.
ProfD Posted Thursday at 02:20 AM Author Report Posted Thursday at 02:20 AM 1 hour ago, Chevdove said: Oh! Okay. So why Nigeria though? Why would Trump choose to retaliate by striking this country. To be clear, the strike was not on Nigeria. It was aimed at the Isis terrorists.
Pioneer1 Posted Thursday at 10:14 PM Report Posted Thursday at 10:14 PM 19 hours ago, ProfD said: To be clear, the strike was not on Nigeria. It was aimed at the Isis terrorists. But it was INSIDE the sovereign nation of Nigeria....LOL. Imagine somebody broke in your house and kicked the door down to grab one of your relatives and whoop them up. Would you be assured that since they were only looking to hurt THAT relative, the rest of your household is safe?
ProfD Posted Thursday at 10:39 PM Author Report Posted Thursday at 10:39 PM 23 minutes ago, Pioneer1 said: But it was INSIDE the sovereign nation of Nigeria....LOL. As mentioned previously, Nigerian leadership was fine with the Isis strike on their soil.
Pioneer1 Posted Thursday at 10:48 PM Report Posted Thursday at 10:48 PM 21 minutes ago, ProfD said: As mentioned previously, Nigerian leadership was fine with the Isis strike on their soil. They had NO CHOICE but to be fine with it. America insisted....lol. When the Mafia comes into your establishment and INSISTS on being your partner, it's an offer you really can't refuse. "This guy right here! I love 'em like my own fuckin' son. By the way.... I had to KILL my son a few years back. Fuckin' miss that kid. NO I DON'T.. ..OR I WOULDNA KILLED 'EM HA HA HAAAA......." 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now