Oh ok @Cynique, I did not read @Delano's reaction as answer to your question. I guess because it did not strike me as being particularly forthright. Perhaps this is why it did not change your opinion of Del being partial to Pioneer.
The fact that Del pointed out correcting you while saying that Mel does not require correction, because she is well informed, was interesting. I'm not sure what Del's intent was but this read as if you are not well information by virtue of you needing to be corrected -- this came across as a passive dig at you.
Now Mel and I are currently having a discussion/debate about a subject on which we have different perspectives. She is sharing information I don't have and I'm sharing information she does not have. I think ultimately we will both come away from the conversation more informed. Mel, like anyone else, is subject to correction. We all are more better informed about some subject than someone else here.
We all come here with knowledge that others don't have. I think Cynique has a great deal of insight about human nature, or people in general. Part of it is her age, our course, but reading people was probably something she was always good at.
I think Del is really sensitive. On the positive side he more empathic that most (a skill needed to be a good tarot card readers or astrologer). He is probably more inclined to come to the defense of someone he perceives as being being hurt (say Pioneer). However on the negative side he can have his feelings hurt more easily.
We are unique and will always have different perspectives -- somewhere in between all of our unique perspectives is the truth.